Exactly. Why should apple pour more money into making sure OS X runs on every available piece of hardware? Kinda like a car company spending money (that could have been used for stuff like R&D) to ensure that it's engine is compatible with every possible car body...
Gotta agree with deyanimey here, the only reason OS X is as stable as it is is because they control the hardware it runs on. Period. I use vista, xp and osx at home and work, and OS X is simply more stable, no doubt. Sure, it might crash VERY occasionally, but compared to the number of vista/xp errors/bsod's i've seen, it pales in comparison. I for one want OS X to stay Mac only, so that they can get the OS running as fast as possible on their hardware. If you dont like it, you don't have to buy it!
Looks cool. Nice to see us UK-ers getting something first for once!
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I need help! I want a small pocket camcorder but I'm not sure which one to get. I don't want to fall into the hype of the Flip because I worry two hours won't be enough. What should I be looking for when considering a small camcorder and where can I get a good quality one with expandable memory? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
