Recent Comments:
Apple admits to lost MobileMe messages, bad karma {Engadget}
Jul 26th 2008 11:02PM Apple has no shame in directly comparing itself to its competitors; almost always over-exaggerating their flaws. Nevertheless, its marketing has worked as Apple has been cannibalizing Microsoft's goodwill and RIMM's market share among consumer (while aiming at enterprise users). If Research In Motion and Microsoft management had any brains, they would jump on the unstable iPhone and MobileMe debacle. But, apparently, they lack both brains and balls.
Amazon Video on Demand store streams film and TV, launches today {Engadget}
Jul 17th 2008 4:56AM Why do Apple fanboys always think Apple was the first to do something? (Hint: Apple did not "start" Video on Demand for your television or via the Internet/Data Networks to your computer).
New iPhone design leaked on iTunes? Highly unlikely. {Engadget}
Mar 7th 2008 3:24PM Interesting, there is no difference between "Engadget classic only Apple news" and simply reading Engadget.
D-Link launches Quadband DIR-855 Wireless N Router {Engadget}
Mar 3rd 2008 2:48PM Don't underestimate Apple owners. They would buy an Airport because it looks better than the better performing D-Link.
35mm slide viewer hacked to enhance iPod nano viewing {Engadget}
Mar 3rd 2008 5:22AM The Engadget Hierarchy
Step 1. Post significant Apple news.
Step 2. Post insignificant Apple news.
Step 3. Post reruns of said Apple news.
Step 4. Sprinkle in very significant news from all other companies from time to time.
Apple patent hints at "advanced multitouch," iPhone copy / paste {Engadget}
Feb 19th 2008 3:44PM Cut and paste with "advanced multi-touch" = fun
Same gesture with your hand in a sock = sock puppet = not fun?
Apple patent hints at "advanced multitouch," iPhone copy / paste {Engadget}
Feb 19th 2008 3:35PM And you thought Bluetooth headsets looked nerdy. . . Sign-language-like gestures to your gadget FTW!!!
Sumvision Ice 1000 tries to be an iPod touch, fails miserably {Engadget}
Feb 19th 2008 11:55AM Slamming almost (literally) every product as an inferior emulation of a "superior" Apple products, considering a $30 discount on an iPod shuffle "newsworthy," and giving minute by minute updates on when the Apple store goes down . . . What are the chances that the blatant bias for Apple exceeds mere fanboyism and propelled by some type of business relationship with Engadget? At the very least, they do advertise on this website, right? Motive = follow the money trail.
If I wanted to know if Steve Jobs farted today, this is the first website I'd check.
Apple store down, again {Engadget}
Feb 19th 2008 6:54AM "Sigh. You know the drill."
Here is an idea, why don't you stop having such drills?
iPod shuffle price cut, now $49 {Engadget}
Feb 19th 2008 6:04AM I don't know anyone "cool" with a Zen, but I know a lot of pompous assclowns with the shuffle.
