| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Engadget | 39 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 3 Comments |

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Actually, they're doing exactly what needs to be done if you ever want to see 3D in the home without glasses. The method of transferring the information from the disc (in this case, BD3D) to the screen is what needs to become mainstream. At the point it gets to the screen, that's where the left and right eye problem need to be solved, and where manufacturers need to put some serious R&D. But why should they? With your plan, the first company to succeed will be bankrupt because they sunk all their money into R&D for a technology which blows away the existing glasses solution in the home, but because you can't actually buy anything that *IS* 3D, all you can watch are your 2D movies. So those of us willing to deal with the glasses for now will help push the technology and delivery platform ahead, and those of you who can't stand the idea of "technology in a wheelchair" can sit this out while the rest of us hobble forward with the only technology available at the time. BTW: Do you own a car? Shouldn't you wait for the flying car or teleporters? It's transportation in a wheelchair... It's not nearly as convenient as being beamed instantly to your destination.