I use Remember the Milk right now to keep me organized, but I would much prefer using a native Mac application.

Get me live sports and I will cancel cable in a heartbeat.

Unfortunately this version of Camino is not using the new JavaScript engine that Firefox 3.5 and above use. Which means, it is going to be much slower on many JavaScript sites.

Too bad really, but Camino is so slow on updates (even security updates) that I have given up on it. I am not going to use a browser that takes days or weeks to release a security update after Firefox already received it. Likewise months (maybe even a year) after Firefox to get any Gecko updates? Sorry, way too slow.

I left a phone on the roof of my car once when I went for a drive. Didn't drive far and was able to backtrack to find it, but not before it had been run over by a I am sure a bunch of cars, trucks, SUV's, and tractor trailers.

I am very intrigued about this. Will have to see if I this will work for my setup.

Should be able to be upgraded via software, unless there are no changes needed to how the AEBS already does Wireless-N. Probably will roll out the next time there is an Airport Extreme Base Station firmware update.

Obviously the antenna improvements can't be done to old AEBS'.

I try to keep my e-mail organized and use my iPhone a lot to keep track of stuff. Still working on that to-do list thing. Hint hint.

Great tip, thanks! That has been always been an annoyance I have had with OS X.

The big thing is it can (eventually) replace Flash without the requirement of needing a plugin installed, not to mention in theory it will eventually be supported by all browsers. This is obviously a big deal when it involves the iPhone since there is no Flash plugin for it and probably never will be.

Here in New Hampshire, Verizon is pretty much the only carrier who has "statewide" coverage. AT&T for the most part is non-existent once you get north of Concord. Unfortunately I have family and friends who are in the northern part of the state, so whenever I go up there, I am several days without coverage thanks to AT&T.

You better believe that in New Hampshire, the iPhone will fly off the shelves if Verizon had it. I know for one I would switch back to Verizon in a heartbeat.

Keep in mind, any LTE phone would have to have backwards compatibility with CDMA & GSM. It will take years for Verizon to build out the LTE network to even provide reasonable coverage for someone to use. Likewise for AT&T when they start moving to LTE. The way to bridge the gap is to provide a LTE phone that can flip back to CDMA or GSM when needed.

So the way I see it is that Apple will do one of the following:
1) Come out with a CDMA iPhone in 2010 (or maybe even sooner) and have two separate iPhones (a CDMA and a GSM).
2) Come out with a universal iPhone that supports LTE, but can fall back on CDMA or GSM depending on the carrier.

I can see 2 happening if Apple can get the necessary hardware into the iPhone with a minimal if any battery life hit. If it can't do that, I see Apple going with option 1 until LTE hardware is viable.