Engadget for the iPhone: download the app now
FEATURES: Engadget iPhone App 10 years of BlackBerry Klipsch HQ tour Google Phone The Engadget Show
  • luckycharms711
  • Member Since Jan 31st, 2008
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Joystiq15 Comments
Engadget9 Comments

Recent Comments:

nato you will not be downloading whole games to the hardrive just maybe one gig of info so that their will be faster load times. I am sure you can eventually delete that off of your hardrive if you are done with the game to save space, and if you choose to play it again you just have to wait for the game to download to the drive or choose not to and wait for the longer load time.
yeah stickam is really good but isn't it webcam only??
no problems here I do not think there are any more problems
what about dookie
It is not exclusive to one system
14-9= 5 cents extra to the consumer per kwh not 14.
well think of the real or physical space you are saving by having movies on the cards...it seems pointless to argue space when you say it is more practical to have one movie on a disc in a case compared to however many you can put on one card.
@ rock99rock
the 360 load times are not faster then the ps3's. Did you read the review for DMC? Because Sony allows Dev's to cache games to the hardrive it allows for faster load times. Microsoft could do this and then just give a warning about slow load times for people without hardrives, but they do not want to alienate the people dumb enough to buy an arcade system.
Lets just hope this doesn't turn out like Fable. I remember reading about it when it was project ego and thinking it was going to be the greatest game ever. It was good but didn't come close to what was originally said it was going to be.
GO CFL it is way better than the NFL!

Gretzky is GOD
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm pretty much a complete noob when it comes to camera stuff. My wife loves to take pictures, though. So much so that she literally wore out her first point and shoot camera, and the Kodak Z712 I bought for her less than two years ago is starting to act up as well. To compound the matter, we are expecting our first born sometime next year. I fear the Kodak just isn't going to cut it any longer. What would be the best starter DSLR to get? She hates missing photo opportunities due to camera 'lag' so speed would definitely be at the top of the list. Photo quality and features would be next. Price should be no more than $800. I'm not interested in video capabilities."
 

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.