Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
Say my one MP3 player for example, I got it for christmas last year. I had an issue where when I would change songs, it would give this high-pitched sort of stutter and then start 4 seconds in the song. I was told that the device was supposed to do this and that I simply had 'sensitive ears' and that the 4 second jump ahead was because the device 'lagged' and needed to catch up.
I returned it because it was just bad quality in general, despite being made by Philips, a company I once had an MP3 player of awesome quality back in the late 90's.
Another time with my LG rumor, it had many issues. From sending the same text a gajillion times to not accepting that you read a text if you hit the END or any other button, so it'd buzz silently wherever it was and only drain it's battery in 10 minutes because of it.
Really it's not so much the customer's fault and moreso the companies just looking to make a quick, fast buck and failing to understand that quality checks are often needed. And by quality checks I don't mean a 5 minute runthrough with the person who programmed the software for it, or engineer who developed the way it was supposed to work and it's internal workings. I mean actual customer testing and feedback.