Apple TV? Gchat? Skype? Wow a pathetic attempt to try to make being an anti-social virgin be mainstream. Sorry, but Steve Jobs and Sergey and LArry will never lket you swallow hteir semen. Saying that cell phone are outdated and substituting Skype is the funniest, most absurd thing you can come up with. But why gchat? Why did you pick the 4th most popular chat client? And Apple TV? Yeah...because EVERYONE has one of those pieces of crap.

The pants part was what I tend to hate about Larry David plots. He takes things too far. I can suspend disbelief enough to buy that he wore the pants the second day so he could retun it. But why was he wearing them AGAIN at the end, other than the joke at the end? It was a forced gag to make you believe that a man worth a quarter billion dollars would wear the same pair of pants three days in a row.

As far as Jeff's infidelity..it is nothing new this season. Every seaon is filled with Jeff cheating on Susie, or at least trying to.

Why ewould Elisabeth Shue have enough clout to play herself? What has she done lately? And really, other than Leaving Las Vegas, what has she done at all? Adventures in Babysitting? Replacing Jennifer in the two Back to the Future sequels that almost ruined the great memories of the original? Hollow Man? She certianly is not an A list actress at this point.

I see by he last line that the author is one of those ignorant idiots who has no idea awhat hte McDonald's hot coffee case was all about. So let's eduicate hte ignorant....McDonalds ADMITTED that the store that was sued went against their own company SAFETY gudelines by heating their coffee to near boiling. They did this so they wouldn't have to throw as much away for being too cold. Coffee is not supposed to be anywehre NEAR boiling. People spill coffee on themsleves all the time. Most people who do so do not need MONTHS of surgeries and skin grafts to lead a semi-normal life. McDonalds ADMITTED liability the entire time. They went to court over the amount, not over whether or not they should pay.

The MCDonald's coffee incident is a perfect example of why civil lawsuits are SUPPOSED to exist. Yet morons who have no knowlege of the actual facts still whine like a bitch about it.

How on earth can you take a DIRECT QUOTE from a TV show internvew and NOT give credit to The Tonight Show?

Plagiarism on theinternet is rampant enough, bu this has to be the WORST example ever. I mean, I realy you write for a blog, so actual professionalism or journalism does not apply, nor do you really make a living as a writer, but there should be SOME integrity

Anyone who believes this article is real is a moron. NO facts whatsoever...Like everyting on engadget, it was simply a "Please Mr. Jobs! Let me suck you dick" fanboy piece for a product that no one has bought. (Hence hte 40% drop in stock since it was announced.)

To sum up...none of this happened. Anyone who believed it is an idiot. Engadget desperately wants to suck Steve Jobs' cock. What did I leave out?

Nothing immature about either of those things. Howver, banging on the bathroom door when you know someone is in there is what 6 year olds do. I assume these girls are old er than that, hence, they are immature.

Still wrong...My god, engadet..aren't you supposed to be somewhat tech savvy? If so, how is it possible that on December 30, 2007, you are still reporting that people have EVER been sued for downloading music?

Luke..you are wrong...and not just one the FIRST GRADE spellinG word like LOSE. (But thanks for proving my point of the intelligence level of this site.)

I call bullshit. He is not being sued for having the music on his computer. The only way they KNOW he has them in the first place is becuase he was obviously SHARING them. Hence..yes, it is illegal, no matter how he obtained them. Not hard to understand, except by the winy little idiots here. No one has ever been sued for downloading music. Not one.