Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: HTC HD2 review Holiday Gift Guide The new Engadget Google's Chrome OS The Engadget Show Droid review
  • Joshua Ochs
  • Member Since Jun 23rd, 2005
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Joystiq7 Comments
The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)144 Comments
Engadget41 Comments
Download Squad3 Comments
PVR Wire3 Comments
WoW25 Comments

Recent Comments:

Agreed. Universal needs Apple more. If they don't put content on iTunes, then people will pirate it instead. They will NOT dump their iPods and such and go to another store, just for Universal, no matter how large a collection they have. Meanwhile, EMI worked with Apple and is now making MORE money off of iTunes Plus.

Interesting that this comes out at the same time as several reports that point to digital sales making a significant impact in sales. If Universal wants to give up those sales and leave money on the table as it were, fine. It won't hurt Apple.
No, you can't be mini-gods. Everyone has to make choices and tradeoffs.

I mean, if we want to go nuts, I want a Warlock with stealth, pally bubbles, and plate armor. Sneak up on you, throw a bunch of DoTs, and bubble hearth. :-)
$15 a month on Sprint is the cheapest you can get, and the sole reason I'm a Sprint customer (you hear that Sprint? Don't mess with it!). Pretty much everyone else charges up to $40 a month.

I would expect something similar from AT&T, just because they know people are going to pay it.
SuperDuper all the way. It can be frustrating if you want to do anything other than full-drive backups, but it performs its primary mission perfectly - back up your data without missing anything, metadata, permissions, and all that jazz. Very, very few programs can legitimately claim this.
Plate tectonics are SSLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW...
To the pedants above - what kind of *RAID* wouldn't involve a lot of storage? Of course it's a single CPU and a lot of disks. If it were a lot of CPU's, it would be a compute cluster, not a RAID.
Bought Parellels 2.x. It served my needs (mostly), but was anything but Mac-like. Ever since VMWare beta3 (and the disabling of the debugging code) I haven't looked back. It's virtualization codebase is more mature, its interface is more Maclike, and its "Unity" feature works better than Coherence for me. ACPI support makes inporting from Boot Camp and real machines trivial (I move my work Thinkpad into a VM all the time to reduce travel weight).

Get VMWare while it's cheap - you won't be disappointed!
The reason elevators show up so much is because they fall at the same rate you do. So if you're unfortunate enough to run to the elevator *just* after it starts to leave, you find yourself falling to your death - a few inches above the moving platform. The Aldor Rise just makes it worse with how high up it is.

Really evil.
Sadly, I can't get it to work. Whenever I try "BigHeadMode" it just logs me in (and fails, since I don't know the password). Anyone know the exact account name and password to make this work?
While I had looked forward to this feature as well, it seemed to have one major flaw - filesystem integrity.

When you put a system into safe sleep or hibernation, there is the assumption inherent that when it wakes up, things will be as they were left - nothing in the underlying filesystem should have changed, of Bad Things (tm) will happen. For the most part, this would have been taken care of since the Mac can't write to NTFS and Windows can't write to HFS+.

However, as soon as you factor in things like FAT32 partitions, MacDrive, MacFUSE/NTFS support, all of this goes out the window. Sure, you can say such things are unsupported, but it could easily become a situation where people inadvertently cause MAJOR damage to their systems. And since the damage to the OS would come when you're booted into someone else's OS, there really wouldn't be a thing Apple could do to prevent it.

At least, that's my figuring. Looks like gamers will have to do a full reboot, and everyone else can buy VMWare.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
 

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.