well. Gateway wasn't even formed until 1985. the original Macintosh all-in-one came out in 1984. the Lisa preceded it in 1983. the Kaypro II and Osbourne both preceded the Apple models by a year or so as well.
i think he was talking of the more mordern all in ones (mid 90s)
btw this is meant as a desktop replacement not a super portable laptop nubs
Oh well, Dell is screwed now anyway, since we have XP running on macs. Viva la BootCamp.
A 360 costs $400-500. What kind of gaming PC could you get for $800-1000?
Answer: A really crappy outdated one that won't even play current PC games, let alone something in the future.
Console gaming gurantees that your machine will stay up to date. Developers design games for your exact configuration. Making games perfrom ideally. jnoble
actually you can build quite nice pc with a 7900gt
who the hell cares what font they use. are you a girl? what the hell
and the boomerange controller got axed so stop crying. for all you know it could have been the most comfortable controller ever and you owuld still whine.
. I think in regards to the comment about why places like Japan get the latest technology is because companies can easily introduce it in Japan and it will be bought no matter how good or bad it is and turn in some kind of profit. Americans on the other hand always want a product that has best features while having the best value for the money.
thats why americans buy crappy american cars that break in 3 years?
wah wah why wont sony support aac on their players waah wahh apple is awesome
first off sony developed aac sony is not using aac because atrac3+ is actually pretty decent how is sony 2 years behind? they have already developed a player like this. If that was the case we could say apple was 4 years behind with the shuffle.
btw this has a screen and the shuffle does not
and to engadget shut up with your anti sony crap and i love apple and try to be as unbiased as possible
there is a world where apple/sony/microsoft/all major companies can live together in peace. believe me i use all those companies products and respect them for what they are good at.
And you paid less because of the resolution. Your 19" screen has 1280x1024 resolution, whereas this Dell has 1680x1050 with about the same amount of screen real estate (do the math - it's 20" diagonal vs. 19, but with a 16x10 aspect ratio vs. 4x3). Higher density screens cost more, and yes, some people do need them.
and the failure to be a smartass award goes to Jeff
the 19 inch widescreen has a 1440x900 resolution but if it was 19 inch with a 1280x1024 resolution it would be 5:4 ratio not 4:3
"I'm in the market for a new phone and money isn't a limitation. I'm also not partial to any particular US carrier, but here are some of the features I'd like to have: WiFi, GPS, good coverage in lots of places, push Gmail (a must!), physical keyboard (a must!), a touchscreen, decent battery life and a relatively slim body. And please, nothing that has a fruit logo on it. No offense to the fruit fans, though. Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
i think he was talking of the more mordern all in ones (mid 90s)
btw this is meant as a desktop replacement not a super portable laptop nubs
Oh well, Dell is screwed now anyway, since we have XP running on macs. Viva la BootCamp.
how is dell screwed? doesnt seem like it to me
stfu apple fanboy