Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm pretty much a complete noob when it comes to camera stuff. My wife loves to take pictures, though. So much so that she literally wore out her first point and shoot camera, and the Kodak Z712 I bought for her less than two years ago is starting to act up as well. To compound the matter, we are expecting our first born sometime next year. I fear the Kodak just isn't going to cut it any longer. What would be the best starter DSLR to get? She hates missing photo opportunities due to camera 'lag' so speed would definitely be at the top of the list. Photo quality and features would be next. Price should be no more than $800. I'm not interested in video capabilities."
you freakin moron...
anyways, digital cameras in phones... suck? who the hell said THAT one? SE K800i/k790i takes very decent pictures and the samsung 9MP camera takes STUNNING pictures (I've had the chance to use it while I was at korea last month) and most SE phones, take upto 4GB of memory capacity, enabling a 1000 songs.
besides all that, the tech within 10 years will squeeze everything in one PDA looking device!
I seriously hate morons who read ENGADGET forums and say "all-in-one devices cannot be made because of tech barriers?" PLEASE, STFU AND READ THE FREAKIN ENGADGET FORUM YOU DOUCHE.