Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide HTC HD2 review The new Engadget Google's Chrome OS The Engadget Show Droid review
  • Deadturtle
  • Member Since Sep 14th, 2006
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Engadget25 Comments

Recent Comments:

Well this would be nice, if I didn't live in dead zone where the big V is trying to unload all its service so it doesn't have to provide internet to the rural areas. I've moving soon to a house with dial-up as the only option. Believe me the first the I do when I walk in the door will be to figure out how the heck I can convince someone (or anyone) to get service to my door. Internet in the US is miserable, overpriced and under serviced. Thankfully small companies up here in VT are trying to step in and change things. Burlington Telco gave the V a big up yours and started running FiOS to all the homes in the city. They have had some growing pains, but they brought Fiber to the market long before V. Maybe some day I'll have 10mbs at my desk, at the moment I just need to figure out how to avoid the 56k line.
Damn. Thats just plain old beautiful. I am still more than satisfied with H101 DB though, for the work that I do. Maybe when I get really famous (yeah right) I'll be able to say I could even remotely justify this guy. At the same time the gear that I have more than satisfies my need. Just remember its not all dollars and megapixels, as someone rightly said the dynamic range and sensor size are part of the equation. I can print billboard sized prints from my *ist DS2 (6mp), what I cannot do is print 11x14 for a gallery with out some Photoshop help.

Finally, in my own opinion, megapixels don't matter (I know I'll get shot for saying that) as sensor density goes up (hence more pixels) you sacrifice other factors (noise, dynamic range etc.) I'd rather see a lower megapixel'd 35mm SLR with great attention paid to HDR and noise. Heck while I'm at it I'd love an easily removable hotmirror filter for IR photography too :).

I guess we can all dream a bit
Jeez if that was to scale, the Mossman must have hands like hubcaps... why didn't some one getting him playing basket ball, he'd be great on D.
Hmm... seems rather arbitrary. No way to verify that the number of shutter actuations are indeed what is on the body. Someone posted their *ist DS had taken 8 million clicks... thats taking a picture every 10 seconds for 971 days, non-stop. Ok so the DS came out in 04, assuming Peter got the first model off the line (a pre-production model from the announce date of Sept. 2006) he would have finished his 8 millionth actuation in March of this year. Wow, I wish I could do that, course I'd never have time to process even a fraction of my 8million pictures, but hey, thats me.

How do I verify this information? How do I separate the defective models that may have had a bad shutter (or an inexperienced user) from the cameras that just died?

Good premise, weak implementation.

And I can't even begin to think about some of the comments about the shutter above, makes my head hurt.
Damn the megapixels to hell and back... I don't care if the D3 has 10mp, as long as the IQ is excellent. In fact I think a 12MP camera, FF, with good photosite density to improve IQ and noise would be far more useful than a 17MP overly dense, noisy camera. But hey, what do I know, I am just a photographer.
So you can post a link to your web page of course.
Heh, sounds like someone at the DOD watched too much Minority Report over the weekend. 'Sick Sticks' anyone?
Damn and that price ain't bad either... this would come in real handy, 90% of the time I don't need to see the pictures, just clear the card.
2004-
http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/17/appetite-for-destruction-weblowitup-com/

My first read, hmmm a site about blowing up technology, lets see what else is kicking around... anyway it provides great stress relief, just order something from here:
www.imsplus.com/ims41b.html and go raid the recycle closet for a nice P133, or PII 450.

2005-
http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/15/clocky-hides-when-you-hit-snooze/
Its Clocky, you just can't get any better than that. I wanted one when the post first hit Engadget, and now I hear she's actually selling these guys:
www.nandahome.com/products.clocky.html
But sadly with out the carpet covering. Still one of my favorite Engadget posts of all time, and yes someday I will take my nice shiny new credit card over to her site and buy one. I can feel my willpower slipping away.

2006-
http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/11/keepin-it-real-wtf/
I have always enjoyed keeping it real fake, each installment is a good insight to the stuff that goes to market in Asia that we'll never, ever see over here in the Land of Bush. Anyway this one just made me laugh out loud and has since been re-created using a virgin-sacrificed USB cable and an old 128mb PNY stick. "You need a USB Stick?"... "Here borrow mine..."
Ooooo toys!!!


I mean.. umm... we have a wifi network here at work... and ummm I'm the security officer.

Yeah thats it, im the security officer here and I need one to ummm.. test security.


Its a neat idea, especially for penetration testing, but I hate to think of what would happen if some of the kids in our Cisco classes got their hands on one. On the other hand it would be interesting to see what this did see on our network.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm pretty much a complete noob when it comes to camera stuff. My wife loves to take pictures, though. So much so that she literally wore out her first point and shoot camera, and the Kodak Z712 I bought for her less than two years ago is starting to act up as well. To compound the matter, we are expecting our first born sometime next year. I fear the Kodak just isn't going to cut it any longer. What would be the best starter DSLR to get? She hates missing photo opportunities due to camera 'lag' so speed would definitely be at the top of the list. Photo quality and features would be next. Price should be no more than $800. I'm not interested in video capabilities."
 

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.