Please stop calling the lack of an optical viewfinder a negative. I don't know anyone 24 years or younger that actually uses a viewfinder on a point and shoot. It's idiotic that cameras are losing points for this. At worst, have a separate designation after rating the camera in all other areas. You can put "NO VF" or just "VF" to say whether it doesn't or does have a viewfinder. Among peers, I've never ran into anyone that would trade a beautiful 3-inch lcd for a smaller screen with a viewfinder. If that's what people really need, they most likely have a camera that is more powerful and clunkier.
"I am trying to configure out a really dumbed down and intuitive PC for my grandmother. She recently had a stroke and while she is under my care I would like to repurpose a laptop for her to surf and email her children. Anyone have any experience with what input devices and UI's are really understandable for the over 80 crowd?"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
