Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech
FEATURES: Google Phone The Engadget Show Holiday Gift Guide Droid review Nook Review CrunchPad / JooJoo
  • Mark
  • Member Since Jan 6th, 2006
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Engadget2 Comments

Recent Comments:

"But who pays for the pipe that provides all of this great stuff?"

We pay for it, through the monthly fees we pay to get Internet connectivity. You're acting like companies like Google and Yahoo are stealing access. Telecomm companies invested in laying fiber because they intended to charge customers fees in order to get their data through those pipes. And why are we willing to pay those fees? Because companies like Google and Yahoo are providing services that we want to access. Those companies provide the value of Verizon's network. So why should the charges flow both ways? Verizon should count themselves lucky that they don't have to pay Google and Yahoo for the right to connect their customers to those services.

You're either profoundly ignorant or a corporate troll.
"Not that we want to see this, but perhaps focusing on a better anti-Skype strategy would be more appropriate."

They already have an anti-Skype strategy: block (or downgrade) any VOIP traffic that isn't their own. Network neutrality, you say? There's no law mandating it, and the FCC doesn't look like it will enforce it, so there's no such thing.

They could do this. They could absolutely do this. Of course, customers would just flock to their competitors if (say) Google stopped being available through Verizon's network because the company chose not to pay Verizon's access tax, so they'd have to do it in concert with other internet backbone companies. And that would certainly look like a trust, which would violate the law. But it would probably be a few years before the government prosecuted them (particularly with the telecomm lobby in Congress encouraging them to look the other way) and it would take another several years before a decision was brought, appealed, and appealed again. In the meantime, all sorts of damage would be done to companies like Google, AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo. Maybe enough damage that they'd just go ahead and pay the tax, or (better yet) merge with the telecomm companies so that they could be the ones blocking out access to their competitors. This could easily get very, very ugly.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I own an iPhone 3G and I'm looking for a decent speaker / alarm clock for it. I am going to listen music in a mid-sized room, so I want nice quality speakers with solid bass. I also want to use it as an alarm clock, so it would be great if there is such a feature. The price can be low-mid to mid-high range. I was looking at the Klipsch iGroove SXT; it's powerful, slick and the reviews are good, but it doesn't have an alarm clock feature. It's no deal breaker if I can set it up from the iPhone, but I'm not sure. Thanks!"
 

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.