@cdwrx: I know, right?

"You know what would be better than a state being able to set its own standard for the air quality that its citizens breath? An illegal collusive relationship between all the major automakers that victimized consumers, that's what!"

havoc,

Sorry, that was a completely failed attempt at refuting a research paper put together by two research universities and published in a major research journal (New England Journal of Medicine) that was vetted by its peers and up for discussion among the academic community as a whole. The full text is available there, so feel free to look through the whole thing, possibly using science and math along the way to refute points and not rough guessing at what you kinda think a summary press release might possibly mean. Thanks for playing.

Chad, Dear God thank you for stating that.

I'm sorry, what? How is it a bad thing that they're making a lot of products to

1) Increase their revenue stream and product diversity
2) Give you more choice

Stop the presses, phone the militia, an icon from an open source operating system graphics package was used in a different project!! EGADS!!

Damnit Autoblog, why do you keep bringing out the "Let's have California sink into the Pacific with an earthquake" crazies with these posts. *Sigh*

I'm not going to go (back) into my whole argument with this, though. I'll just leave you nutcases to your circle jerk.

Is there any other answer?? Palm Pre, hands down.

I love love love Engadget! Gimme!

gotta love math with words. 8^P

I like the BMW, so I don't mind that he picked a very handsome car. I like the Audi's too, and that Cadillac is quite fierce. I'm a fan of all these picks.