I think if HD makes sense for any kind of content, then for games. When I see movie trailers in HD resolution (apple.com/trailers), the difference between 480p and the HD resolutions are often hard to tell. The cameras (HD and 35mm) are not good enough yet, some shots are intentionally unsharp or just too dark, and whatnot. But I can easily see the difference between a computer game running in 640*480 and one running in 1024*768 or higher. The HDTV effect is much more dramatic for artificially created graphics.

Having said that, I think that Nintendo made the right decision anyway. People will buy that console because of the controller, the games and possibly the cheaper price. (Almost) no one will refuse to buy the Wii just because it is not HDTV-capable.

Hmm... they may be color-accurate, but I guess their viewing-angle sucks.

I need a miniature version of this for my window, to keep the insects out.

The DVB-T codecs are not correct: DVB-T can use MP2 as audio codec (in germany all channels use MP2; some have AC-3 as alternative audio track). And France announced to use DVB-T with MPEG4.