Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I own an iPhone 3G and I'm looking for a decent speaker / alarm clock for it. I am going to listen music in a mid-sized room, so I want nice quality speakers with solid bass. I also want to use it as an alarm clock, so it would be great if there is such a feature. The price can be low-mid to mid-high range. I was looking at the Klipsch iGroove SXT; it's powerful, slick and the reviews are good, but it doesn't have an alarm clock feature. It's no deal breaker if I can set it up from the iPhone, but I'm not sure. Thanks!"
babe?
i do not think that word means what you think it means.
i see a barrel-shaped butterhog."
Congratulations, x23, you're officially queer for not having the common sense you should've been born with to get that she's wearing a vest and it's a tad bulky, or flowing... but she's not bulky.
Okay, so you'll understand I'll put it in small words -- you're dumb.
On the controller -- Now, allow me to preface this by saying I haven't handled one of these controllers so I'll not make stupid widebrush statements about it, but does it figure to anyone else that essentially breaking a controller into two pieces is a bad idea? I don't want a controller that's cumbersome & even if I just use one half of it, WHY? Are the current "normal" controllers truly that bad? I'm just speculating, not bashing, but I think the appearance alone will offput some potential customers. Though it's certainly possible it'll draw people in also.