As per Engadet/Weblogs Inc review polices (http://www.weblogsinc.com/#exp_readers):

"Bloggers do not receive free products or services from the companies they write about."

"Bloggers do accept review units; however, when they're finished reviewing products, they return these items to the manufacturers. If the manufacturers do not take the items back, we give them to our readers. This is the same editorial policy as the New York Times or Wall Street Journal."

@alex

I thought they covered the shortcomings pretty well in their original review, actually:

"The panel just seems, for lack of a better word... crappier. The viewing angle is reduced considerably; looking even a little bit off to the side or up above can cause a nasty amount of polarization. The brightness levels also don't seem to be what they are on the Pro. Don't get us wrong, compared with the last generation MacBooks, these are stunning -- but compared to the Pros, they're just not as impressive."
http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/macbook-and-macbook-pro-review/

Agreed, Jack Harkness was very well written.

"Good news for everyone, though: tracks at all price points are reportedly going to be DRM free and playable on any mp3-playing gadget."

Well sure, as long as that mp3-playing gadget can play AAC files.

"a tragic meditation on the downfall of the human race. See if you can spot the exact moment right after the break."

The "that's what she said!" line?

Entertainment

Damn straight. If not caring about the ratings means excellent shows like Chuck get renewed based on talent alone, I'm all for it.

Last video? An episode of the fantastic QI...

Aussie Devs can find their IPCCs ready made for them on the ever-resourceful Whirlpool Forums: http://bit.ly/Or4Mp

Let's just be thankful it wasn't a repeat of that horrific Exel-Spreadsheet-Hidden-In-Level-Ten-Of-Prince-Of-Persia incident (http://www.joystiq.com/2007/11/13/nbcs-life-investigates-prince-of-persia/)