c'mon, dont just make statements, support them with facts. isnt that the first thing one learns in elementary english classes?

wow, that sucks. This is a good example of "creul and unusual punishment" many schools require research and internet usage, and therefor he would suffer for such a minor crime. If wifi users are really that protective of their wifi, they can password protect it. This is an over reaction.

i think the family shouldnt win. I researched this, and apparently during the contest she complained of stomach pains and other discomforts. Anyone who would continue to drink after that would know that they would probably be at least ill after continuing to drink. also, she competed of her own free will, and, in my opinion, the family should not be able to win the law suit. It was a tragic event, but the lawsuit is in my opinion uncalled for.

"only one rule, no touching of the hair or face. and thats it!"

wow, the babykeeper is just disturbing...

it doesnt matter if the lanyard was used or not, you are supposed to hold onto the wiimote at all times. If one does hold on, they will not be letting go (logicaly). and if one does not let go, short of beating someone with it, no injuries will occur.

gears of war
1

placid lakes or the many farms and flat lands in southern Netherlands

My favorite show is 24

Lost