| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Autoblog | 2 Comments |
| Joystiq | 26 Comments |
| Gadling | 10 Comments |
| Engadget | 21 Comments |
| TV Squad | 1 Comment |
| Slashfood | 13 Comments |
| Joystiq Playstation | 8 Comments |
| Joystiq Nintendo | 12 Comments |
| Joystiq Xbox | 2 Comments |
| Netscape Blog | 1 Comment |

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
However, some of the picture enhancement technologies are not useless at all. I'm quite fond of Sony's Motionflow because it effectively doubles the motion resolution from 300 to 600 vertical lines. That difference is clearly noticeable in gaming (have a go at something like Wipeout HD if you can, with and without Motionflow), at the cost of increased input lag.
How much the input lag bothers depends very much on the game. I did complete Ratchet & Clank TOD on PS3 with Motionflow on, but in a frantic shooter like Geometry Wars on Xbox 360 I think can detect the lagginess and the "game mode" is definitely the way to go.
There are also big differences in how much these motion enhancers cause lag (also between Sony sets), so study before you buy!
If I have understood correctly Motionflow and other similar technologies interpolate individual frames and because of that there will always be *some* input lag when using them.