| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 5 Comments |
| Engadget | 7 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 9 Comments |
| Joystiq Xbox | 10 Comments |

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
HD DVD had all the features from day one and they didn't need to have any updates and when the did get upgraded all the HD DVD players had ethernet ports to easily upgrade. The ony blu player that can do this is the PS3 (smart move on sony's side but not everyone, like my dad, dosen't even think about getting a "gaming console" to play movies)
I would change the fact the blu-ray won. I would have gone to Microsoft (if i was Toshiba) and pushed them to go after movie companies to "win" over their support. Microsoft could have done this very easily. Dosnen't matter if they would have put the player in the 360 or not (it would have helped but...)
Anyway, wished HD DVD would have won. I do own a PS3 for blu-ray only (no game interests me) and I do not plan on replacing my HD DVDs with Blu versions. I may buy another HD DVD player as a backup when they come down in price even more.
Sorry for the length, if you read this all the way through...thank you!
Recap: HD DVD = better in every way besides disc size. Players were/are more advanced and are easier updated.
Glad war is over though!