Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
Rather than just spouting useless "X > Y" arguments without offering any logic why, do you think maybe you could state why you think one is better than the other?
Here's a nice example:
I like iPhone OS because it integrates well with my Macs.
See that? That was an opinion backed up with justification. And not an opinion disguised as fact.
And while we're on the subject, why does everyone here feel so threatened by other people's opinions that they have to low-rank them, or just shout the opposite back at them?
I use iPhone OS. But Android looks pretty cool to me too, and I've used Windows Mobile for years and have great respect for it. As for WebOS? Definitely interesting. Time will tell for that one. Symbian? I haven't used it much at all. Does that mean I'll now claim that it's crap? No. No it doesn't.
Because I don't know a damn thing about Symbian. And therefore I post no opinion about it. I don't feel the need to attack the things I don't personally use.
Why do so many other people on here? *SIGH*