Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm pretty much a complete noob when it comes to camera stuff. My wife loves to take pictures, though. So much so that she literally wore out her first point and shoot camera, and the Kodak Z712 I bought for her less than two years ago is starting to act up as well. To compound the matter, we are expecting our first born sometime next year. I fear the Kodak just isn't going to cut it any longer. What would be the best starter DSLR to get? She hates missing photo opportunities due to camera 'lag' so speed would definitely be at the top of the list. Photo quality and features would be next. Price should be no more than $800. I'm not interested in video capabilities."
my friend, people NEED to run at 1920x1200 if they have a 24" LCD display and that's the screen's native resolution. Everyone knows that monitors look best at their native res.
I had a 7900GTX that I bought a year ago, didn't use it much, and then Company of Heroes came around and the card stuttered at 1920x1200 resolution. That game was so great it made me go out and want to buy something that showed the game off in all its beauty. I bought the 8800GTX and it was worth every penny - TO ME (granted all the readers here that still get a weekly allowance from mom as their means to buying PC upgrades will ofcourse disagree).
Also, the argument that you could get a PS3 or XBOX360 is apples vs. oranges - there is simply no match on the console for games like Company of Heroes, or more significantly CRYSIS (the game that will rule them all). When Crysis comes out, have yourself a look at it running on a high-end rig and then tell me if anything else in existence comes anywhere close. Another reason I got the 8800GTX was for Crysis, though i'll probably have to SLI a couple of them and pair them up with a Quadcore CPU to get max eyecandy, but so be it - you only live once.