| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 1 Comment |
| Engadget | 58 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 5 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 1 Comment |

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
In light it would be redundant to use lets say a a 7800gt and a 8800gt in union due to the differences of the nature of the designs. so in a fact I would say it is a better choice to keep it to where the direct x versions match. ie dx9-dx9 dx10-dx10 dx11-dx11. It just would not makes sense to hamper the performance of the more advanced dx version just so you can say "look what I can do".
I will add I love the idea of getting my hands nvidia dx11 part to add to my 5870 and hving all the perks of both cuda and stream as well as full dx 11 support with out driver issues and lockouts. (points finger at nvidia)Both companies should embrace this tech and AMD needs to get some boards out with the hydra on them.
And again mixing direct x generations can only be trouble for pefromance. To take full advantage of the tech keep it the same as far as the direct x generation.