How about a couple new polls:

1. "Will Engadget ever learn to make a scientific and useful poll?"

Where's the option for "Well, I see more bars more often, but I can't tell if my signal is actually improved"?

2. "Will Engadget ever give us a way to view poll results without voting?"

Many times I want to see the results of a poll without voting, because either I don't have the product being polled or none of the answers apply for me (see #1). In order to see the poll results I have to skew the results by picking a B.S. response.

Ugly, and they need to fire whoever it is that mixed their paint. None of the new pieces match the original color.

Too thick for my wallet. I like to keep my wallet as flat as possible, hence all the benjamins instead of twenties. :P

The submitter should read more carefully before hitting "submit".

This article says nothing about these bots being used to "break up the asteroid or veer it off course". They would be used to collect data about the structure of the asteroid in order to devise the proper means to push or pull the asteroid off its collision path with Earth.

Blowing up an asteroid would be no small feat, and you can't blow something up by exploding a charge on its surface--at least not something THAT big. All you'd be able to do is make a crater and give it a little nudge.

This entry needs to be on http://www.badastronomy.com

Funny, I just returned the SC101 last week to Fry's because, well, it was slow as all heck. Hopefully this would improve things, but now I'm stuck with two ATA drives, so I guess I'll be looking at other solutions.

Yep, these have been around for a LONG time.

http://www.getac.com/pages/products/prod_A770.html

I would take this very much!

This is my generic comment.

I still don't get how Mitsu is getting away with blatantly lying about the ride height on the Eclipse. In real life and in other photography on the web you can see that the car has a ton of gap between the tire and the fender. Mitsu seems to have digitally altered all of their photos of the car such that this gap doesn't exist.

How could no one at Autoblog have realized how old this article is? It was published in March!