<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Trinity laptop review roundup: beats Ivy Bridge on gaming, but CPU lets the herd down]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/"><img alt="AMD Trinity laptop review roundup: beats Ivy Bridge on gaming, but CPU lets the herd down" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/anandtech-trinity2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 441px; height: 450px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> If you've been following AMD's game plan over the last couple of years, then you probably won't be totally shocked by what follows. That said, reviewers' verdicts of the new high-end <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-apu-unveiled/">Trinity laptop APU</a>, the 2.3GHz quad-core A10-4600M, do include some dizzying highs and despairing lows, which are still kinda surprising in their own way. Like how? Well, <em>HotHardware</em> found that AMD's chip beats Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">Ivy Bridge</a> (with integrated HD 4000 graphics) by 30 to 50 percent in some games, albeit with a few stumbles over immature DX11 drivers. Similarly, <em>AnandTech</em>'s handy table above shows just how far ahead Trinity is across fifteen common titles. On the other hand, most reviewers found that non-gaming CPU performance fell far short of Ivy Bridge and even Sandy Bridge mobile chips. For example, <em>Hexus</em>'s Geekbench scores put the APU 40 percent behind last year's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/23/dell-xps-15z-review/">Dell XPS 15z</a>, which is totally underwhelming. So, as usual, it'll all depend on what you need a laptop for -- but if you're after something that costs $699 or less, handles regular day-to-day tasks okay and can also play current games with decent frame-rates, then you'll be keen to conduct further research at the links below.</p><p> <a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-Trinity-A104600M-Processor-Review/?page=1">Read</a> - HotHardware<br /> <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5831/amd-trinity-review-a10-4600m-a-new-hope/1">Read</a> - AnandTech<br /> <a href="http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/39333-amd-a10-4600m-trinity-apu/">Read</a> - Hexus<br /> <a href="http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Mobile/AMD-A10-4600M-Trinity-Mobile-Review-Trying-Cut-Ivy">Read</a> - PC Perspective</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/">AMD Trinity laptop review roundup: beats Ivy Bridge on gaming, but CPU lets the herd down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 08:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20238203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/amd-trinity-a10-4600m-review-roundup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>amd</category><category>amd a10-4600m</category><category>amd trinity</category><category>AmdA10-4600m</category><category>AmdTrinity</category><category>apu</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>chip</category><category>cpu</category><category>gpu</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptop processor</category><category>LaptopProcessor</category><category>processor</category><category>review roundup</category><category>ReviewRoundup</category><category>trinity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buying an iPad 2? Here's the rarer, more efficient specimen you need to (somehow) track down]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/"><img alt="Buying a $399 iPad 2? Here's the rarer, more efficient specimen you need to (somehow) track down " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/ipad24-final.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 377px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> Not all iPads are made equal, even if they're all packaged and branded identically. There's a major new mutation within the 2nd generation tablet and it brings significantly better battery life. Specifically, the fourth and latest production model of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/09/ipad-2-review/">iPad 2</a> (known as iPad2,4) has not only a lower price tag ($399) but also a new 32nm processor, which is significantly smaller and more efficient than those in previous iPad 2s (which had 45nm chips and an older transistor design). According to <em>AnandTech</em>, this results in an overall 16 percent increase in battery life during web browsing and as much as a 30 percent boost when playing games. Obviously that's worth having, but how can you tell if a boxed-up iPad 2 has the new processor before taking it to the checkout? Here's the downer: you can't. Until retailers' inventories naturally flood with the updated type, the only way to tell is by switching the slate on and running a utility like GeekBench -- and perhaps there'll be circumstances where you can give that a go on the shop floor. Alternatively, if third-party sellers discover that their stock is the iPad2,4, they could pull off a Darwinian win-win by marketing that fact to buyers.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/">Buying an iPad 2? Here's the rarer, more efficient specimen you need to (somehow) track down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/rare-ipad-2-variant-32nm-processor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>4</category><category>apple</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>apple ipad 2</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>AppleIpad2</category><category>battery</category><category>battery life</category><category>BatteryLife</category><category>chip</category><category>efficiency</category><category>ipad</category><category>ipad 2</category><category>Ipad2</category><category>processor</category><category>soc</category><category>transistor</category><category>variant</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 05:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung announces 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad as basis for Galaxy S3]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/"><img alt="Samsung announces 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad as basis for Galaxy S3" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/exynos-s3.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> Looking for something a bit more solid than a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/">third-party benchmark</a>? We can do that. "Already in production the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/">Exynos 4 Quad</a> is scheduled to be adopted first into Samsung's next Galaxy smartphone that will officially be announced in May," the horse's mouth reveals. Samsung boasts that the new 32nm 1.4GHz quad-core processor flaunts twice the processing power over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/01/samsung-releases-1-5ghz-exynos-processor-and-16mp-cmos-for-mobil/">its predecessor</a>, thanks to its High-K Metal Gate (HKMG) low-power technology. The net energy savings? About 20-percent. "The application processor is a crucial element in providing our customers with a PC-like experience on mobile devices," explains Hankil Yoon, Senior VP of Product Strategy Team at Samsung, "Samsung's next Galaxy device, which will be officially announced soon, offers uncompromised performance and ground breaking multitasking features, thanks to Exynos 4 Quad's powerful performance and efficient energy management technology." Sammy says it's shopping the new processor around to other handset manufacturers (like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/15/meizu-mx-quad-core-launch-android-4-0/">Meizu</a>), noting that the Exynos 4 Quad is pin-to-pin compatible with the Exynos 4 Dual (the brains behind the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-review/">Galaxy S II</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Note</a>), which gives designers the ability to update product designs with minimal costs. Check out Samsung's full press release after the break.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Samsung announces 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad as basis for Galaxy S3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/">Samsung announces 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad as basis for Galaxy S3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20224471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.4 ghz</category><category>1.4 GHz Quad-core</category><category>1.4Ghz</category><category>1.4GhzQuad-core</category><category>32nm</category><category>breaking news</category><category>Device Solutions</category><category>Dual</category><category>exynos</category><category>exynos 4 quad</category><category>Exynos4Quad</category><category>Galaxy</category><category>galaxy s</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s III</category><category>galaxy sIII</category><category>GalaxyS</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>Hankil Yoon</category><category>HankilYoon</category><category>High-K Metal Gate</category><category>High-kMetalGate</category><category>HKMG</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>quad core</category><category>quad-core</category><category>QuadCore</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy</category><category>SamsungGalaxy</category><category>Sci/Tech</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple TV (2012) raids iPad 2 parts bin, packs 32nm A5 silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/"><img alt="Apple TV (2012) raids iPad 2 parts bin, packs 32nm A5 silicon" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/a5vsa5fromatv.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 480px; height: 302px;" /></a></div>Cupertino's latest Apple TV has already been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/apple-tv-2012-gets-torndown-confirmed-to-have-512mb-of-ram-8/">torn asunder</a> and had its guts revealed to all the online world. And, we've already told you of the many ways that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/apple-tv-vs-the-new-apple-tv-2012-whats-changed/">it differs</a> from its predecessor. Despite that in-depth examination of Apple's media streamer, turns out it had another secret that was recently unlocked by the folks at <em>Chipworks</em>, who discovered it's packing a new, smaller A5 chip that's masquerading as a single-core unit. Turns out, that's the same 32nm dual-core SoC found in new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/09/ipad-2-review/">iPad 2s</a> -- elder iPad 2 units pack 45nm chips -- but the 3rd-gen Apple TV only uses one of those cores to give you your 1080p fix. We don't know if the second core's simply sitting idle or if Apple's using up some defective A5s it had laying around, but we do know that you can see some more close up shots of the silicon in question at the source below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/">Apple TV (2012) raids iPad 2 parts bin, packs 32nm A5 silicon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20213744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/apple-tv-2012-raids-ipad-2-parts-bin-packs-32nm-a5-silicon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>a5</category><category>apple</category><category>apple tv</category><category>apple tv 2012</category><category>AppleTv</category><category>AppleTv2012</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Globalfoundries buys out AMD to become fully independent chip maker]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/aitc.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/amd-announces-globalfoundries-spin-off-forgets-to-name-it-somet/">Globalfoundries</a> has celebrated its third anniversary by announcing that it's agreed terms with AMD to buy out its remaining stake in the company to go it alone. Whilst Sunnyvale will remain a key customer to the chip foundry, the nuts and bolts of ownership will be wholly in the hands of ATIC. The company now provides a big chunk of AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/28/amd-looking-to-ship-32nm-chips-in-2010/">32nm</a> wafers and is now kicking off a $3 billion spending plan to kit out its facilities in Singapore, Germany and New York. It looks like the single life will allow it to spend equal time and effort refining those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/globalfoundries-takes-arm-cortex-a9-into-28nm-land-looks-forwar/">20nm ARM chips</a> promised for 2013 as well as its new partnership with IBM.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Globalfoundries buys out AMD to become fully independent chip maker</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/">Globalfoundries buys out AMD to become fully independent chip maker</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20185999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/globalfoundries-buys-out-amd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>AMD</category><category>ARM</category><category>ATIC</category><category>Business</category><category>Chip</category><category>Chip Fabrication</category><category>Chip Foundry</category><category>ChipFabrication</category><category>ChipFoundry</category><category>Chips</category><category>CPUs</category><category>Financials</category><category>Globalfoundries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung demos new 32nm quad-core Exynos ahead of MWC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/"><img alt="Exynos" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/exynos-5250.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 500px; height: 324px; " /></a></div>If you were lucky enough to be at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference, then you might have caught a glimpse of Samsung's latest sliver of mobile silicon. The as yet unnamed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/exynos">Exynos</a> parts will come in dual- and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/quad-core-meizu-mx-may-arrive-in-may-with-revamped-ui-says-comp/">quad-core</a> configurations running at up to 1.5GHz. Perhaps the most important change though, is the switch from a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/new-samsung-chip-has-two-of-everything-two-cores-2ghz-2560-x/">45nm</a> manufacturing process to 32nm. That means smaller parts that draw less power, while delivering better performance. The A9 cores are paired with Sammy's own GPU, an OpenGL ES 2.0-capable chip with four pixel processors. According to the company, the new CPUs deliver a 26 percent boost in performance and up to a 50 percent increase in battery life. Of course, we'll have to wait to run our own benchmarks to confirm that lofty claim. Who knows, maybe we'll see it show up in some phones at MWC.<br /><br />[Thanks, Vlad]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/">Samsung demos new 32nm quad-core Exynos ahead of MWC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20178501/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/samsung-demos-new-32nm-quad-core-exynos-ahead-of-mwc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>a9</category><category>arm</category><category>arm a9</category><category>ArmA9</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>exynos</category><category>exynos 4212</category><category>exynos 4412</category><category>Exynos4212</category><category>Exynos4412</category><category>International Solid-State Circuits Conference</category><category>InternationalSolid-stateCircuitsConference</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>processor</category><category>quad-core</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Piledriver cores will clock over 4GHz, employ 'resonant clock mesh']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/amd-trinity.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>AMD's Trinity APU can do some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/amd-strikes-ces-with-brand-new-apus-and-lightning-bolt/">remarkable things</a>, but we still don't know exactly what magic ingredients make its Piledriver cores superior to the tepidly received <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/microsoft-leak-reveals-hotfix-for-underperforming-bulldozers/">Bulldozer</a>. Now though, a firm called Cyclos claims it's supplying 'resonant clock mesh' power-saving technology for use in the new module. In speaking to the media, it's revealed that this will help to enable a "4+ GHz" factory clock speed, which sounds high if it definitely refers to an integrated chip with low-power credentials. As for the resonant clock mesh itself, it's a bit like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/KERS/">KERS</a> for processors: it recycles clock power instead of letting it dissipate and thereby enables higher clock speeds in "next generation SoCs that also require ultra-low power consumption." We also know that the technology is financially backed by ARM and Siemens and has seen precious little implementation prior to AMD -- which is fine, so long as all that resonance doesn't make our rig hum even louder.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/">AMD Piledriver cores will clock over 4GHz, employ 'resonant clock mesh'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20176798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/amd-piledriver-cores-will-employ-resonant-clock-mesh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>4ghz</category><category>amd</category><category>amd piledriver</category><category>AMD Trinity APU</category><category>AmdPiledriver</category><category>AmdTrinityApu</category><category>apu</category><category>ARM</category><category>clock speed</category><category>ClockSpeed</category><category>core</category><category>cpu</category><category>cyclos</category><category>piledriver</category><category>power consumption</category><category>PowerConsumption</category><category>resonant clock mesh</category><category>ResonantClockMesh</category><category>siemens</category><category>Trinity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Four Atom chips sneak out of Intel, soon to appear in netbooks and nettops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/intel-logo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 16px 12px; float: left;" /></a>Rarely do you hear of new chips sneaking out of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a>, <em>Escape from Alcatraz</em>-style. But that's (figuratively) happened today, with a quartet of processors appearing with little fanfare from Chipzilla. Two of these you might recognize as members of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/cedar-trail-may-be-delayed-new-atoms-gone-til-november/">delayed</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">Cedar Trail</a> series, the D2500 and D2700. The former clocks at 1.86GHz and 2.13GHz, with the latter upping that to 2.13GHz and 2.4Ghz; both have a thermal design power of less than 10W. The other two chips sip power even more judiciously: the N2600 has a TDP of less than 3.5W at 1.6GHz or 1.86GHz; the N2800 has a 6.5W TDP, running at 1.86GHz or 2.13GHz. All include GPUs, with the N2000 series destined for netbooks, while the D2000 series should end up in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nettop/">nettops</a>. To dig deeper into the specs, see Intel's datasheet at the source link below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/">Four Atom chips sneak out of Intel, soon to appear in netbooks and nettops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20072877/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/four-atom-chips-sneak-out-of-intel-soon-to-appear-in-netbooks-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>atom</category><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>BluRay</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>cedar view</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>CedarView</category><category>Chipzilla</category><category>D2500</category><category>D2700</category><category>ddr2</category><category>ddr3</category><category>htpc</category><category>hyper threading</category><category>hyper-threading</category><category>HyperThreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>netbook</category><category>netbooks</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>on-die gpu</category><category>On-dieGpu</category><category>platform</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>TDP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Hicks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Asus Eee PC 1025 treads a Cedar Trail through the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/asus-eee-pc-in-fcc.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Attracted by all that Cedar Trail <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/">gossip</a> about 10-hour battery life and weeks of standby time? Then you'll be pleased to see that Asus's Eee PC 1025C and higher-end 1025CE models have received their nods from the FCC. Both pack the latest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">32nm Atom</a> processor under their 10.1-inch hoods, along with an HDMI-out, Kensington lock and flush trackpad. The CE additionally serves up a USB 3.0 port, 4x zoom on its webcam and a metallic finish. <em>NetbookNews</em> got some hands-on time with these babies at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/computex2011">Computex</a> and reported prices of $249 and $279 for the C and CE respectively -- whet your appetite at the More Coverage link.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/">Asus Eee PC 1025 treads a Cedar Trail through the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20070468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/30/asus-eee-pc-1025-treads-a-cedar-trail-through-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10.1-inch</category><category>1025c</category><category>1025ce</category><category>32nm</category><category>Asus</category><category>Asus Eee pc</category><category>AsusEeePc</category><category>atom</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>eee pc</category><category>eee pc 1025</category><category>eee pc 1025c</category><category>eee pc 1025ce</category><category>EeePc</category><category>EeePc1025</category><category>EeePc1025c</category><category>EeePc1025ce</category><category>intel</category><category>netbook</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel adds 16 CPUs to Sandy Bridge stable, slashes prices on some older silicon]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/sandybridgelead.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It's been a few months since AMD <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/amd-compares-upcoming-llano-fusion-apu-with-intel-core-i7-kil/">threw down the gauntlet</a> on Intel with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/">lower-priced Llano lineup</a>, and now Chipzilla's responded with some new bargain basement <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/">Sandy Bridge silicon</a>. The refresh includes 11 new desktop CPUs: a Core i5 chip, three Core i3s, and a handful of dual-core Pentium and Celeron processors as well. There are also five new mobile chips, including three new quad-core Core i7s (2960XM, 2860QM, and 2760QM), and the dual-core Core i7-2640M and Celeron B840. In a separate nod to these tough economic times, Intel cut the prices on a few of its existing models, too. Granted, it's only a six-percent discount at the most, but we're sure you can put those dollars to good use <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/28/owc-mercury-electra-6g-ssd-lineup-updated-with-smaller-60gb-opti/">elsewhere</a> in your next DIY rig.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/">Intel adds 16 CPUs to Sandy Bridge stable, slashes prices on some older silicon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20035929/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/06/intel-adds-16-cpus-to-sandy-bridge-stable-slashes-prices-on-som/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>core i3</category><category>core i5</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>corei7</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpus</category><category>intel</category><category>price cut</category><category>price drop</category><category>PriceCut</category><category>PriceDrop</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel says Cloverview platform will launch in time for Windows 8]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11-05-08inteluwb.jpg" style="width: 250px; height: 165px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 16px 12px; float: right;" /></a>Intel didn't provide much indication of a release timeframe when it first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-teases-32nm-cloverview-tablet-processor-22nm-ivy-bridge-c/">teased</a> its tablet-minded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cloverview">Cloverview</a> platform back in April, but it's now finally starting to dish a few more details (though still not many specifics, unfortunately). Speaking with <em>This is my next</em>, Intel's Director of Product and Technology Media Relations, Bill Kircos, said that the chipmaker is looking to deliver a "nice one-two chip-software punch," and roll out the Cloverview platform and accompanying Clover Trail processor around the same time as Windows 8 -- possibly before, but seemingly no later. Of course, exactly when <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/windows8">Windows 8</a> itself will launch still remains a bit of a mystery, although <em>ZDNet's</em> Mary Jo Foley notes that the latest rumor of a release to manufacturing in April of next year is not so crazy, and that "April sounds better than July."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/">Intel says Cloverview platform will launch in time for Windows 8</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19978550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/intel-says-cloverview-platform-will-launch-in-time-for-windows-8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>atom</category><category>clover trail</category><category>CloverTrail</category><category>cloverview</category><category>intel</category><category>microsoft</category><category>platform</category><category>processor</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>windows</category><category>windows 8</category><category>Windows8</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel adds to ULV processor line with 1.8GHz Core i7 and i5 options, one of them to star in ASUS UX21]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/11x06210734fge.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Intel's so-called <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/">Ultrabooks</a> may be a little way off into the distance at the moment, but the company isn't making you wait until its Ivy Bridge rollout to get a taste for ultraslim laptops with some real power inside them. A trio of new ultra-low voltage CPUs, each rated with a TDP of just 17W, has been added to the company's catalog, starting with the top-tier Core i7-2677M, whose pair of cores run at 1.8GHz by default but can be sped up to 2.9GHz when duty calls. Then there's the i7-2637M, which looks to only differ in clock speeds (1.7GHz default, 2.8GHz under Turbo Boost), and the i5-2557M that makes do with a 3MB L3 cache (1MB less than its i7 brethren) and a 1.7GHz / 2.7GHz speed range. All three 64-bit, 32nm processors also integrate a GPU (350MHz base clock, maxes out at 1.2GHz) within their walls, which is what makes their ascetic power consumption all the more impressive. OEMs should soon start splicing these new options into their next generation laptops, and while the obvious speculation centers around a MacBook Air refresh, <em>CNET</em> tells us the Core i5-2557M has already found a home in ASUS' upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/">UX21</a>, a (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/">purportedly</a>) sub-$1,000 11.6-inch featherweight contender.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/">Intel adds to ULV processor line with 1.8GHz Core i7 and i5 options, one of them to star in ASUS UX21</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19972189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>17w</category><category>32nm</category><category>core 2011</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-2557m</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i7-2637m</category><category>Core i7-2677M</category><category>Core2011</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-2557m</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-2637m</category><category>CoreI7-2677m</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>efficient</category><category>intel</category><category>low power</category><category>low voltage</category><category>LowPower</category><category>LowVoltage</category><category>processor</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>shipping</category><category>ulv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD's Fusion A-Series chips official: 10.5-hour battery life, DirectX 11 graphics, and USB 3.0 support (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/fusion-a-series-lead.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/llano">Llano</a> platform has been on our radar for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/15/amd-releases-another-notebook-roadmap-does-not-release-fusion-c/">more than</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/amd-spells-out-the-future-heterogeneous-computing-bulldozer-an/">two years</a>, and finally, the company has come clean with its latest class of hybrid CPU / GPU chips, officially dubbed the Fusion A-Series. Unlike the low-power flavor of Fusion accelerated processing units <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/amd-announces-first-fusion-chips-10-hour-battery-life-with-dir/">already on the market</a>, these 32-nanometer APUs were designed with desktops and mainstream laptops in mind, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/amd-compares-upcoming-llano-fusion-apu-with-intel-core-i7-kil/">taking direct aim</a> at Intel's Core 2011 processors with the promise of superior processing and discrete-level graphics, and 10-plus hours of battery life.<br />
<br />
Aside from the assorted performance and battery life claims the company is making (much more on that in a moment), what this means is that as far as laptops go, AMD is completely stepping away from the standalone-CPU-plus-GPU paradigm. <em>But</em>, the company will still make dedicated Radeon cards, which can be coupled with an APU for a 75 percent boost in graphics performance -- a setup AMD is calling "Dual Graphics." All told, these chips measure just 228 square millimeters. To put this in context, check out the gallery of hands-on shots below, featuring the A-series next to a standalone CPU, discrete graphics card, and, for the sake of scale, the kind of low-power Fusion chip <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/amd-announces-first-fusion-chips-10-hour-battery-life-with-dir/">introduced</a> back at CES.<br />
<br />
A-Series-equipped PCs are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/">already shipping</a>, and AMD says we can expect to see at least 150 of them this year. That sounds promising indeed, but we've still got lots of technical details to rehash. Head on past the break for the full spill on what these APUs pledge to do, along with a video of AMD senior product marketing manager Raymond Dumbeck showing off some A-series laptops in action.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/">AMD Fusion A Series hands-on</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/#4159733"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/dsc06296_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/#4159734"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/dsc06303_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/#4159735"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/dsc06306_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/#4159736"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/dsc06309_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amd-fusion-a-series-hands-on/#4159737"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/dsc06317_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD's Fusion A-Series chips official: 10.5-hour battery life, DirectX 11 graphics, and USB 3.0 support (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/">AMD's Fusion A-Series chips official: 10.5-hour battery life, DirectX 11 graphics, and USB 3.0 support (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19949011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32-nanometer</category><category>32nm</category><category>A-series</category><category>A4</category><category>A4-3300M</category><category>A4-3310MX</category><category>A6</category><category>A6-3400M</category><category>A6-3410MX</category><category>A8</category><category>A8-3500M</category><category>A8-3510MX</category><category>A8-3530MX</category><category>accelerated processing unit</category><category>AcceleratedProcessingUnit</category><category>AMD</category><category>AMD Fusion</category><category>AMD Perfect Picture HD</category><category>AMD Steady Video</category><category>AMD Vision</category><category>AmdFusion</category><category>AmdPerfectPictureHd</category><category>AmdSteadyVideo</category><category>AmdVision</category><category>APU</category><category>chip</category><category>chips</category><category>Fusion A-series</category><category>FusionA-series</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Core 2011</category><category>IntelCore2011</category><category>Llano</category><category>Perfect Picture HD</category><category>PerfectPictureHd</category><category>platform</category><category>Radeon</category><category>Raymond Dumbeck</category><category>RaymondDumbeck</category><category>Sabine</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x0531bu23eds.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Intel took the opportunity at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/computex">Computex</a> to update the tech-loving world on its processor plans, and it looks like those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/">whispers</a> we heard about low power and an accelerated Atom roadmap were spot on. Executive VP Sean Maloney didn't divulge specific TDPs but did confirm that we could look forward to reduced power consumption and sleek designs in 2012. The Intel exec declared that new class of PC, dubbed "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/">Ultrabooks</a>," will make up 40-percent of the market by the end of 2012. These machines, powered by the 22nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">Ivy Bridge</a>, will be less than 0.8-inches thick and start at under $1,000 -- which sounds just like the lines we were fed about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/19/intels-culv-platform-guns-for-amds-neo-danger-will-robinson/">CULV</a> chips back in 2009.<br />
<br />
Maloney also confirmed that, going forward, the Atom line would be getting a die shrink every year, as opposed to every two. The upcoming, 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedartrail">Cedar Trail</a> will usher in the new Moore's Law-smashing era with promises of a 10 hour battery life and weeks of standby, and will be succeeded by 22nm and 14nm models. Intel even talked up Medfield, it's Atom variant designed specifically for smartphones and tablets, and showed off <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/intel-promises-more-than-10-new-tablets-at-computex-including-a/">more than 10 tablets</a> based on the Oak Trail-flavored <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/intel-rolls-out-atom-z670-oak-trail-processor-for-tablets/">Z670</a>. With AMD merely a fading blip in the company's rearview mirror it looks like Chipzilla is gunning for all those ARM-touting manufacturers. Check out the full PR after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/">Intel's Computex 2011 keynote</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176971"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531403e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176972"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531404e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176973"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531405e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176974"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531406e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176975"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531407e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/">Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 May 2011 23:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19953609/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nm</category><category>22nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>3d transistor</category><category>3d transistors</category><category>3dTransistor</category><category>3dTransistors</category><category>asus</category><category>asus ux21</category><category>AsusUx21</category><category>atom</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2011</category><category>Computex2011</category><category>culv</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>intel core</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelCore</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>medfield</category><category>netbook</category><category>netbooks</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>oak trail</category><category>OakTrail</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>sean maloney</category><category>SeanMaloney</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>ultrabook</category><category>ultrabooks</category><category>ulv</category><category>ux21</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Llano quad-core APUs and Zambezi octa-core CPUs get priced, the former listed inside an HP dv6]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x0524092331zx.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Don't mistake the relative quietness from AMD on the APU front for inactivity. Ever since announcing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/">first shipment</a> of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/amd-compares-upcoming-llano-fusion-apu-with-intel-core-i7-kil/">Llano Accelerated Processing Unit</a> in April, the company's been working behind the scenes to ramp up availability to OEMs, and somewhere along the supply chain a gracious soul has been found who's leaked the bulk pricing for those chips. The new quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/amd-quad-core-a8-3530mx-processor-for-laptops-to-debut-in-june/">A Series</a> processors start off at $110 for an A6-3450 and max out at $170 for an A8-3550P, but there's also mention of octa-core FX processors, which will weigh in at $320 a piece and reputedly compete with Intel's 3.4GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/origin-pc-takes-genesis-and-big-o-gaming-desktops-to-5ghz-with-o/">Core i7-2600K</a>. The latter are built around AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/">Bulldozer</a> modules (wherein one module counts for two cores) and look to be the manifestation of the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/amd-publishes-cpu-roadmaps-through-2012-runs-a-quad-core-bulldo/">Zambezi CPUs</a>, which could come <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/">without an integrated graphics processor</a> as is available on the Llano and the rest of AMD's Fusion line.<br />
<br />
Just to whet appetites further, we've also come across an HP <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/hps-quad-edition-dv6t-and-dv7t-laptops-now-available-radeon-hd/">dv6</a> on an obscure German retail site, offering a 1.6GHz A6-3410MX APU, 6GB of RAM, and a most reasonable &euro;590 price. There's obviously no promised delivery date, but this should be the first of many such appearances in the coming days as we build up towards Computex 2011. Something tells us AMD won't be holding back when the Taipei electronics show gets started.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Shashwat and Vygantas]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/">AMD Llano quad-core APUs and Zambezi octa-core CPUs get priced, the former listed inside an HP dv6</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 May 2011 04:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19948331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/24/amd-llano-quad-core-apus-and-zambezi-octa-core-cpus-get-priced/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>a series</category><category>a-series</category><category>a4</category><category>a6</category><category>a6-3410mx</category><category>a8</category><category>Accelerated Processing Unit</category><category>AcceleratedProcessingUnit</category><category>amd</category><category>amd llano</category><category>AmdLlano</category><category>apu</category><category>ASeries</category><category>bulldozer</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2011</category><category>Computex2011</category><category>cpu</category><category>dv6</category><category>eight-core</category><category>fusion</category><category>hp</category><category>hp dv6</category><category>HpDv6</category><category>leak</category><category>llano</category><category>octa-core</category><category>octacore</category><category>price</category><category>pricing</category><category>processor</category><category>quad-core</category><category>rumor</category><category>shipments</category><category>shipped</category><category>shipping</category><category>speculation</category><category>zambezi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 04:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/medfield-phone-01-31-2011.jpg" /></a></div>
After Intel's early <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/intel-demos-iphone-like-mid-of-the-future/">smartphone</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/05/intel-reaches-for-the-smartphone-zone-with-moorestown-based-at/">ambitions</a> failed to bear fruit, experiencing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">delay</a> after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">delay</a>, the company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">seemingly decided</a> it'd be a bad idea to give reporters so much as a ballpark release date. Well, the company's confidence must have returned, because CEO Paul Otellini just told investors that those 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> smartphones are indeed on the way. "You'll see the first Intel-based phones in the first part of next year," he said at the company's annual investor meeting today, adding later that there will be "phones shipping in the market from major players" at that time. Here's hoping.<br />
<br />
Why all the delays? Intel blamed its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-and-nokia-officially-partner-on-mobile-devices-the-possi/">partnership with Nokia</a>, calling it a mistake. "In hindsight, Nokia was the wrong partner to have picked," said Otellini, but told attendees that the time both companies spent working together won't be wasted entirely: Intel is currently shopping around their co-developed handset as a reference design.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/">Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19942869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>Intel</category><category>Medfield</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>phone</category><category>reference design</category><category>ReferenceDesign</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Cedar Trail gets some specs, combines CPU and GPU on a single chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/4-29-2011intelatomlineup.jpg" alt="Intel Atom Lineup" /></a></div>
That new processor smell has barely started to fade from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/oaktrail/">Oak Trail</a> and we're already getting some tantalizing details about the next generation of Atom chips -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedartrail">Cedar Trail</a>. As expected, Intel has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/">moved to 32nm</a>, which allows it to cram the GPU and the CPU onto the same sliver of silicon. The first two models, the D2500 and D2700, will be dual-core, sport 1MB of L2 cache, and have a miserly TDP of 10w -- 3w lower than current dual-core Atoms. The former will be clocked at 1.86GHz with Hyper-Threading turned off, while the D2700 flips the switch on those two extra threads and kicks it up a notch to 2.13GHz. The new integrated graphics will boast better HD decoding and support for Blu-ray playback which, when combined with the taunts of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/20/intel-promises-next-gen-atom-chips-at-idf-beijing/">fanless designs</a> and WiDi, make Cedar Trail a natural fit for the living room.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">Intel's Cedar Trail gets some specs, combines CPU and GPU on a single chip</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19927946/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>Atom</category><category>blu ray</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>BluRay</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>cedar view</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>CedarView</category><category>D2500</category><category>D2700</category><category>ddr2</category><category>ddr3</category><category>htpc</category><category>hyper threading</category><category>hyper-threading</category><category>HyperThreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>on-die gpu</category><category>On-dieGpu</category><category>platform</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11x0406n82xdxeon07.jpg" /></a></div>
Someone deep down in Intel's development dungeons must be laughing a haughty laugh of disdain at us mere mortals getting excited about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/02/qualcomms-1-5ghz-dual-core-msm8660-destroys-the-competition-in/">dual-cores in smartphones</a>. The old Chipzilla has just turned out its <em>10</em>-core Xeon E7 processor family, which can work on 20 simultaneous computational threads courtesy of the company's Hyper-Threading knowhow. Needless to say, there aren't that many casual workloads that will ever properly harness such extremely parallelized prowess, but then Intel isn't really gunning for the Facebook crowd here anyhow. The new E7s are for those dealing with truly data-intensive tasks, meaning that Facebook <em>itself</em> would be a good candidate to buy up a few, provided it's tempted by such things as 40 percent performance improvements over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> tied to dynamic power adjustment for increased energy efficiency. Pricing for the Xeon E7s starts at $774 and climbs up to $4,616 per 32nm chip, with the usual proviso that Intel won't sell them in batches of less than 1,000. More details follow in the press release and video after the break.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, <a href="http://itechvision.blogspot.com/2011/04/intel-unveils-new-10-core-xeon.html">Khan</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/">Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19904539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-core</category><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>e7</category><category>enterprise</category><category>high-end</category><category>hyper-threading</category><category>hyperthreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>launch</category><category>mission critical</category><category>MissionCritical</category><category>official</category><category>performance</category><category>processor</category><category>release</category><category>server</category><category>video</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon e7</category><category>XeonE7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD ships 32nm quad-core Llano APU, expects systems 'later this quarter']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/32nm-llano.jpg" /></a></div>
Whoa, Nelly! AMD, a company that has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/19/intel-to-delay-yorkfield-chips-because-of-amds-struggles/">struggled</a> to nail its ship dates in years past, has just pulled the ultimate 180. If you'll recall, we heard last month that its quad-core Llano APU was on track for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/">Q3 2011 release</a>, but now, we've word straight from the equine's mouth that the action will be going down far sooner. In fact, AMD's Singapore plant just celebrated the first shipment of the company's 32nm Llano A-series APUs, complete with discrete-level graphics and a promise to change the way we think about netbook / nettop / ultraportable performance. Of course, just because these chips are headed out to OEM partners doesn't mean that they'll be gracing the pages of your favorite PC maker tomorrow; Chief Financial Officer and Interim CEO Thomas Seifert notes that AMD is looking forward to seeing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Llano/">Llano</a>-based machines during this quarter, but given that Q2 just got going, we may be waiting awhile still. Nothing like a little <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Zacate/">Zacate</a> to tide you over in the meantime, right?<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD ships 32nm quad-core Llano APU, expects systems 'later this quarter'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/">AMD ships 32nm quad-core Llano APU, expects systems 'later this quarter'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19902922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/amd-ships-32nm-quad-core-llano-apu-expects-systems-later-this/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32 nanometer</category><category>32Nanometer</category><category>32nm</category><category>amd</category><category>apu</category><category>available</category><category>chip</category><category>CPU</category><category>fusion</category><category>Llano</category><category>now available</category><category>now shipping</category><category>NowAvailable</category><category>NowShipping</category><category>processor</category><category>quad-core</category><category>ship</category><category>shipments</category><category>shipping</category><category>ships</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD's quad-core Llano APUs pegged for Q3 2011 release, Computex unveiling]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/11x0318bsccx7.jpg" /></a></div>
<em>X-bit labs</em> has a (pretty massive) scoop of AMD info to share with us this week, as it has put together the above chart detailing what it expects the company's APU roadmap will look like for the remainder of the year. Published a couple of days ago, this data has now been partially corroborated by the snoops over at <em>DigiTimes</em>, who confirm a couple of the model names and agree that AMD is planning an initial Q3 rollout of five <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/amd-publishes-cpu-roadmaps-through-2012-runs-a-quad-core-bulldo/">Llano</a> chips, to be followed by even more processors coming in Q4 of 2011. Llano represents AMD's play for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/amd-compares-upcoming-llano-fusion-apu-with-intel-core-i7-kil/">performance crown</a>, coming as it does with dual- or quad-core processing units, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/amd-fusion-apu-gets-its-first-public-demo-at-computex-video/">DirectX 11-capable</a> Radeon HD 6000-series graphics, and a dual-channel DDR3 memory controller, all bundled up inside the same warm and toasty package. More E-series APUs for power-conscious users are also said to be on the cards, and AMD itself should be making these plans official at Computex in Taipei come early June. It's a bit of a wait, but we've got a feeling it'll be worth it.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD's quad-core Llano APUs pegged for Q3 2011 release, Computex unveiling</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/">AMD's quad-core Llano APUs pegged for Q3 2011 release, Computex unveiling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19883842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/amds-quad-core-llano-apus-pegged-for-q3-2011-release-computex/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011</category><category>32nm</category><category>a6-3450</category><category>a8-3550</category><category>amd</category><category>apu</category><category>Bulldozer</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2011</category><category>Computex2011</category><category>cpu</category><category>desktop</category><category>directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>fusion</category><category>gpu</category><category>husky</category><category>llano</category><category>performance</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>q3</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>schedule</category><category>speculation</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM forms new partnership with ARM in hopes of developing ludicrously small chip processing technology]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="0" width="317" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="350" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/engadgetarmibmpartnership2.jpg" style="" /></div>
We've seen IBM and ARM team up before, but this week both companies announced a new joint initiative to develop 14nm chip processing technology. That's significantly smaller than the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/arm-and-tsmc-team-up-for-tinier-20nm-cortex-socs/">20nm SoC technology</a> ARM hopes to create in partnership with TSMC, and makes the company's previous work with IBM on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/23/ibm-and-friends-buddy-up-on-32-nanometer-semiconductor/">32nm semiconductors</a> look like a cake walk. The potential benefits, though, are faster processors that require less power, and feature lower per unit manufacturing costs  Who knows if or when we'll see tangible results from the tag team, but if IBM's Watson can <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/ibms-watson-supercomputer-destroys-all-humans-in-jeopardy-pract/">beat Jeopardy champions</a>, further reducing the average size of a feature that can be created on a chip should be elementary, right? To read over the full announcement check out the press release after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IBM forms new partnership with ARM in hopes of developing ludicrously small chip processing technology</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/">IBM forms new partnership with ARM in hopes of developing ludicrously small chip processing technology</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19806607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/ibm-forms-new-partnership-with-arm-in-hopes-of-developing-ludicr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nanometer</category><category>14nm</category><category>20nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>ARM</category><category>ARM processor</category><category>ArmProcessor</category><category>chips</category><category>ibm</category><category>IBM Corp.</category><category>ibm watson</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>IbmWatson</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>microprocessors</category><category>mobile processor</category><category>MobileProcessor</category><category>partnership</category><category>power consumption</category><category>PowerConsumption</category><category>processors</category><category>Semiconductor</category><category>semiconductors</category><category>silicon</category><category>SoC</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Bowers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 2nd Generation Core processor family announced, includes 29 new CPUs and enhanced graphics]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/sandybridgelead.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><em>They're here!</em> That is, Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a> mobile and desktop processors herein known as the 2nd Generation Core processor family or more simply as Intel Core 2011 processors to us. After <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/">months of teasing</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-briefly-demos-next-gen-sandy-bridge-laptop-platform-at-com/">on-stage demos</a>, Chipzilla is finally unleashing the details of its new Core i3, i5, and i7 processors, and considering there are 29 new CPUs in total as well as new integrated graphics options (now known as processor graphics) there's quite a bit to digest. Hit the break for our rundown of the new platform and a look at some of Intel's newest performance and graphics-focused features. <br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/">Intel Core 2011 processor details</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/#3731519"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelcore20111_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/#3731521"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelcore20113_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/#3731522"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelcore20114_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/#3731523"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelcore20115_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-2011-processor-details/#3731524"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelcore20116_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel's 2nd Generation Core processor family announced, includes 29 new CPUs and enhanced graphics</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/">Intel's 2nd Generation Core processor family announced, includes 29 new CPUs and enhanced graphics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19783600/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2011</category><category>ces2011</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel core i3</category><category>intel core i5</category><category>intel core i7</category><category>intel hd graphics</category><category>IntelCoreI3</category><category>IntelCoreI5</category><category>IntelCoreI7</category><category>IntelHdGraphics</category><category>processors</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>WiDi</category><category>Widi 2.0</category><category>Widi2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel prices fresh Core i5 and i7 mobile parts]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/nov12odsfihladwr4-1258028929.jpg" /></a>We'd say Intel is delivering its new chips <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/">like clockwork</a>, but then <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/08/seikos-active-matrix-e-ink-watch-will-be-on-sale-by-end-of-20/">our favorite timepieces</a> don't usually leak anywhere near as often as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/">Chipzilla's roadmaps</a>. The now well known 2.66GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-core-i5-580m-and-core-i7-640m-highlight-sonys-asian-lapto/">Core i5-580M</a> has finally been made official, costing $266, alongside an identically clocked family mate in the Core i5-560M, which will set bulk buyers back $225 a piece. From what we know of those two, the major difference is that the 580M can <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Turbo Boost</a> its way to 3.33GHz whereas the 560M maxes out at a humbler 3.2GHz. Both are overshadowed, however, by the new i7-640M colossus, which runs at 2.8GHz by default and will reach 3.4GHz when called upon -- yours for only $346. Of course, should the 35W TDPs of those chips seem too gaudy for you, Intel's wisely dropping a pair of 18W parts as well: the Core i5-560UM slinks along at 1.33GHz and asks for $250, while the Core i7-680UM raises those numbers to 1.46GHz and $317, respectively. Finally, for the perfect balance of power and efficiency, the i7-660LM couples 2.26GHz (or 3.06GHz in Turbo mode) to a 25W thermal envelope. It matches the 640M with a $346 unit price. All these CPUs sport a pair of 32nm cores alongside a 45nm integrated graphics unit and there are absolutely <em>no</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/18/intel-wants-to-charge-50-to-unlock-stuff-your-cpu-can-already-d/">Performance Upgrade Card</a> anywhere in sight!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/">Intel prices fresh Core i5 and i7 mobile parts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19649385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/27/intel-prices-fresh-core-i5-and-i7-mobile-parts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>availability</category><category>core 2010</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-560m</category><category>core i5-580m</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i7-640m</category><category>core i7-660lm</category><category>core i7-680um</category><category>Core2010</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-560m</category><category>CoreI5-580m</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-640m</category><category>CoreI7-660lm</category><category>CoreI7-680um</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>hardware</category><category>i5-560m</category><category>i5-560um</category><category>i5-580</category><category>i7-640m</category><category>i7-660lm</category><category>i7-680um</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>mobile cpu</category><category>MobileCpu</category><category>price</category><category>priced</category><category>pricing</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel: Sandy Bridge CPUs will ship in early 2011 (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010134.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="float: right; margin-bottom: 16px; margin-left: 4px;"><script type="text/javascript"> (function() { var s = document.createElement('SCRIPT'), s1 = document.getElementsByTagName('SCRIPT')[0]; s.type = 'text/javascript'; s.async = true; s.src = 'http://widgets.digg.com/buttons.js'; s1.parentNode.insertBefore(s, s1); })(); </script> <a class="DiggThisButton DiggLarge">Digg</a> </span> We're live from the 2010 Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco, where we've got an interesting tidbit of news -- those long-awaited and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/">often</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-detailed-and-tested-exhaustively-actu/">leaked</a> Sandy Bridge processors will "begin shipping in very high volume" early next year in both laptop and desktop PCs. Now called the "2nd Generation Intel Core processors," the new chips will feature Intel's new 32nm architecture for everything, including the integrated graphics processor and memory controller, which will hopefully reduce their power consumption even as the new hardware's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-detailed-and-tested-exhaustively-actu/">not terribly friendly to overclockers</a>. PR after the break.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>Intel's on stage explaining a bit more about how Sandy Bridge works -- apparently the Turbo modes introduced in earlier Core chips (which dynamically clock individual processor cores based on how much thermal headroom they have) now works dynamically with the silicon's integrated graphics as well. Intel says it can actually exceed the TDP thermal envelope of a chip now to further overclock multiple cores at once, or switch off between overclocking graphics or CPU cores for differing workloads. See a few example images in the gallery below.<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/">Intel Sandy Bridge's advanced Turbo mode</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/#3356242"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010126_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/#3356244"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010127_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/#3356245"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010129_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/#3356246"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010130_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-sandy-bridges-advanced-turbo-mode/#3356247"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-13-10-intelidf2010132_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel: Sandy Bridge CPUs will ship in early 2011 (update)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/">Intel: Sandy Bridge CPUs will ship in early 2011 (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19631511/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/intel-sandy-bridge-cpus-will-ship-in-early-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2010</category><category>Idf2010</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel Core</category><category>intel developer forum</category><category>IntelCore</category><category>IntelDeveloperForum</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD's Bobcat and Bulldozer, 2011 flagship CPU cores, detailed today]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdnnbioe4.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
One of these days AMD is gonna have to stop talking about its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/intelatom">Atom</a>-killing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/bobcat">Bobcat</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/xeon">Xeon</a>-ending <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/bulldozer">Bulldozer</a> cores and finally release them. But, until that happy moment arrives in 2011 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/15/amd-releases-another-notebook-roadmap-does-not-release-fusion-c/">fingers crossed</a>), we'll have to content ourselves with more presentation slides. First up, the Bobcat core is AMD's long overdue play for the netbook/ultrathin market. Pitched as having 90 percent of the performance of current-gen, K8-based mainstream chips, AMD's new mobility core will require "less than half the area and a fraction of the power" of its predecessors. That sounds like just the recipe to make the company relevant in laptop purchasing decisions again, while a touted ability for the core to run on less than one watt of power (by lowering operating frequencies and voltages, and therefore performance) could see it appear in even smaller form factors, such as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/mid">MIDs</a>. The Bobcat's now all set to become the centerpiece of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/amd-to-finally-take-on-netbook-space-with-new-fusion-chip-nex/">Ontario APU</a> -- AMD's first Fusion chip, ahead of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/">Llano</a> -- which will be ramping up production late this year, in time for an early 2011 arrival.<br />
<br />
The Bulldozer also has a future in the Fusion line, but it's earliest role will be as a standalone CPU product for servers and high-end consumer markets. The crafty thing about its architecture is that every one Bulldozer module will be counted as two cores. This is because AMD has split its internal processing pipelines into two (while sharing as many internal components as possible), resulting in a sort of multicore-within-the-core arrangement. The way the company puts it, it's multithreading done right. Interlagos is the codename of the first Opteron chips to sport this new core, showing up at some point next year in a 16-core arrangement (that's 8 Bulldozers, if you're keeping score at home) and promising 50 percent better performance than the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/magny-cours">Magny-Cours</a> flagship. Big words, AMD. Now let's see you stick to a schedule for once.<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/">AMD's Bobcat and Bulldozer, 2011 flagship CPU cores, detailed today</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/#3286291"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdbbhc01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/#3286292"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdbbhc02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/#3286293"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdbbhc03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/#3286294"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdbbhc04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-today/#3286295"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0824amdbbhc05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD's Bobcat and Bulldozer, 2011 flagship CPU cores, detailed today</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/">AMD's Bobcat and Bulldozer, 2011 flagship CPU cores, detailed today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19603274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/24/amds-bobcat-and-bulldozer-2011-flagship-cpu-cores-detailed-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>amd</category><category>amd bobcat</category><category>amd bulldozer</category><category>amd fusion</category><category>AmdBobcat</category><category>AmdBulldozer</category><category>AmdFusion</category><category>apu</category><category>bobcat</category><category>bobcat core</category><category>BobcatCore</category><category>bulldozer</category><category>bulldozer core</category><category>BulldozerCore</category><category>components</category><category>core</category><category>cores</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpu core</category><category>CpuCore</category><category>desktop</category><category>fusion</category><category>future</category><category>hardware</category><category>hotchips</category><category>hotchips 2010</category><category>Hotchips2010</category><category>interlagos</category><category>laptop</category><category>multicore</category><category>netbooks</category><category>notebooks</category><category>ontario</category><category>opteron</category><category>out-of-order</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>schedule</category><category>ultrathin</category><category>video</category><category>zambezi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba introduces 32nm DDR NAND with 133Mbps speeds, or MT/s if you prefer]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/8-11-10-toshibanand600-1281582385.jpg" alt="" /></div>
It doesn't quite have the efficiency and capacity of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/toshiba-preps-for-sub-25nm-flash-memory-production-archivists-r/">this 25nm process</a>, and it's not half as speedy as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/23/samsung-and-toshiba-double-down-on-400mbps-ddr-2-0-nand-flash-me/">that planned 400Mbps</a>, but Toshiba is moving up in the world with today's reveal of 32nm, 133Mbps toggle-mode DDR NAND. The new flash memory chips will go head to head with the similar 30nm toggle-mode NAND <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/samsungs-high-speed-512gb-ssd-to-begin-volume-production-next-m/">used in Samsung's 512GB SSD</a> and the 166Mbps <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ONFi/">ONFi</a> 2.1 chips that power <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/micron-realssd-c300-becomes-first-ssd-to-leverage-sata-6gbps-int/">Crucial's RealSSD C300</a> drive; each of the tiny black chips can store up to 32 gigabytes. Shame there's no word on when we'll see these speeding our PCs and iPods, nor any mention of price. PR after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toshiba introduces 32nm DDR NAND with 133Mbps speeds, or MT/s if you prefer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/">Toshiba introduces 32nm DDR NAND with 133Mbps speeds, or MT/s if you prefer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19590383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/toshiba-introduces-32nm-ddr-nand-with-133mbps-speeds-or-mt-s-if/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>DDR NAND</category><category>DdrNand</category><category>flash</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>NAND flash</category><category>NandFlash</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state storage</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateStorage</category><category>SSD</category><category>toggle mode</category><category>toggle-mode</category><category>toggle-mode ddr</category><category>Toggle-modeDdr</category><category>ToggleMode</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 3.2GHz hexacore i7-970 now shipping]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0719ioub234523sa.jpg" /></a></div>
Just this once, <em>DigiTimes</em> has turned out to be spot on with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/intel-set-to-overhaul-desktop-cpu-range-with-new-models-lower-p/">its prognostication</a>. The six-core Core i7-970 rumor we heard earlier this month has now transmogrified into a retail product, and just as promised, it brings most of the goodies of the sublime <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/intels-core-i7-980x-extreme-edition-gulftown-review-roundup/">i7-980X</a> at a moderately more affordable $899 price point. Based on the same 32nm Gulftown architecture as its costlier brother, the 970 will run at 3.2GHz by default, though presumably it too will be able to crank up speeds using Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/turboboost">Turbo Boost</a>. Aside from that, you get a healthy 12MB of on-chip cache and the standard triple-channel DDR3 memory controller. UK speed freaks can order one up as well now, clearly a tiny bit ahead of Intel itself making things official, so we'd advise checking with your nearest super-CPU purveyors in case they too have received some early units of this multithreaded code cruncher.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Polytonic]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/">Intel's 3.2GHz hexacore i7-970 now shipping</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19559080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/intels-3-2ghz-hexacore-i7-970-now-shipping/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>970</category><category>availability</category><category>available</category><category>core 2010</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i7-970</category><category>Core2010</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-970</category><category>gulftown</category><category>hexacore</category><category>intel</category><category>launch</category><category>lga1366</category><category>newegg</category><category>retail</category><category>shipping</category><category>six-core</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0714oub245advvx.jpg" /></a></div>
Right now, Intel has every right to lay contentedly atop the laurels of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/intel-has-its-best-quarter-ever-brings-in-2-9b-profit/">its biggest quarterly profit ever</a>, but that's not what the company is doing at all. Instead of protracting the life of its current-gen processors unduly, Intel is planning to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-briefly-demos-next-gen-sandy-bridge-laptop-platform-at-com/"><em>accelerate</em></a> the roadmap for its next generation of multicore parts, codenamed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a>. The difference between the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Nehalem-based stuff</a> we have today and the upcoming chip is that the Sandy Bridge architecture takes everything down to 32nm -- including the graphics processor and memory controller which are built at 45nm at present -- while keeping it all within the same enclosure. Enthusiastic feedback from customers who were given tasters of the Sandy stuff has been to blame for this haste on Intel's part, and we're told that with additional investment in 32nm infrastructure, the chip giant plans to make deliveries late this year. That in turn could potentially result in some eager vendor pushing a Sandy Bridge laptop or desktop out before 2010 is through -- which would be all kinds of nice.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/">Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19553624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>ceo</category><category>chips</category><category>cpu</category><category>forecast</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>schedule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba cooks up 128GB NAND flash for next-gen phones and PMPs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/10x0617toshiba00zz.jpg" /></a></div>
Leave it to Toshiba to make even the latest smartphones feel somewhat undernourished. Quadrupling the current high-end standard of 32GB of embedded memory, the Japanese company has announced an all-new 128GB slab of storage, built on a 32nm production process. It's somehow managed to fit sixteen 8GB NAND chips, plus their controller, inside a 1.4mm tall structure, and samples are about to exit the factory doors this September. A 64GB variant will also be making an appearance, with both scheduled to enter mass production sometime during the fourth quarter. Should go pretty nicely with that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/10/motorola-wants-a-2ghz-android-by-years-end-so-do-we/">2GHz beastphone</a> Moto is planning, don't you think?<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toshiba cooks up 128GB NAND flash for next-gen phones and PMPs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/">Toshiba cooks up 128GB NAND flash for next-gen phones and PMPs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19519851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/toshiba-cooks-up-128gb-nand-flash-for-next-gen-phones-and-pmps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>128gb</category><category>32nm</category><category>64gb</category><category>cellphone memory</category><category>CellphoneMemory</category><category>e-mmc</category><category>embedded flash</category><category>EmbeddedFlash</category><category>emmc</category><category>flash</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>high capacity</category><category>HighCapacity</category><category>memory</category><category>storage</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Core i5-580M speeding toward a fall release at 2.66GHz?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="left" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0524boj124.jpg"  alt="" /></a>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/23/msis-customizable-gx640-gaming-notebook-now-shipping/">Core i5-540M</a> is still quite rare on the ground, but we're hearing word that Intel is already prepping the assembly line for its successor. A new Core i5-580M has been dug up by the sleuths at <em>Notebook Italia</em>, who say it'll run at a default 2.66GHz and ramp up to 3.33GHz via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Turbo Boost</a> when needed. Those numbers compare favorably to the 2.53GHz and 3.06GHz of the 540M, and if Intel and company get their timing right,the 580M should be stealing some of that Core i7 thunder just in time for the back to school shopping rush. Won't hear any complaining from us if that turns out to be the case.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/">Intel Core i5-580M speeding toward a fall release at 2.66GHz?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 24 May 2010 04:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19488538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>arrandale</category><category>core 2010</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-540m</category><category>core i5-580</category><category>core i5-580m</category><category>Core2010</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-540m</category><category>CoreI5-580</category><category>CoreI5-580m</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpu roadmap</category><category>CpuRoadmap</category><category>hardware</category><category>intel</category><category>intel core i5-580</category><category>IntelCoreI5-580</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptop cpu</category><category>LaptopCpu</category><category>laptops</category><category>mobile cpu</category><category>MobileCpu</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>refresh</category><category>roadmap</category><category>schedule</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><category>update</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 04:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo adds touch to IdeaCentre A700 and B305 all-in-ones, vies for your desktop dollars with H320]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo034.jpg" /></a></div>
While keeping the overdesigned aesthetic of their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ideacentre">IdeaCentre</a> brandmates, the new A700 and B305 (above) all-in-ones from Lenovo are moving things forward with optional touchscreens and freshened up spec sheets. The A700 offers the full range of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Intel's Core 2010 laptop CPUs</a>, but tops things off with the slightly older 45nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/intel-cores-1-73ghz-i7-820-qm-mobile-cpu-maneuvers-onto-test-be/">Core i7-820QM</a>, which gives you four cores operating at a somewhat pedestrian 1.73GHz default speed that can be cranked up to 3.06GHz when circumstances demand it. Other specs include a 1080p 23-inch display, built-in 802.11a/b/g/n wireless, and a side-mounted Blu-ray drive. If you're feeling extravagant, you can even cram in 8GB of DDR3 RAM, but don't expect to be paying the $999 entry price for <em>that</em> package when these become available at the end of June.<br />
<br />
The B305 gives AMD fans something to admire, with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/athloniix4">Athlon II X4</a> processors, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/ati-radeon-hd-5450-focuses-on-multimedia-features-neglects-gami/">Radeon HD 5450</a> graphics -- great for multimedia, but forget about 3D gaming -- up to 4GB of DDR3 RAM, and up to a 21.5-inch display stretching to 1,920 x 1,080. Built-in wireless and a DVD-RW drive are again present, along with up to a terabyte of storage (2TB on the A700, that showoff) should you opt to tread beyond the $699 entry price. The B305 will be purchasable next month, as will be the H320 old schooler. Starting out at $549, this small form factor pc offers Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/intels-32mn-processors-show-off-power-efficiency-in-informal-pr/">32nm desktop parts</a>, with the finest of the bunch being the 2.8GHz Core i7-860. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/ati-radeon-hd-5570-fills-the-last-remaining-gap-in-directx-11-em/">Radeon HD 5570</a>, up to 8GB of memory, a terabyte of storage, Blu-ray, and wireless options fill out its vital statistics, though you'll have to buy your own monitor. Full PR after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/">Lenovo IdeaCentre A700 and B305, plus H320 desktop</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/#2970647"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/#2970648"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/#2970650"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/#2970651"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-ideacentre-a700-b305-and-h320-desktop/#2970652"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0511nelenovo05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lenovo adds touch to IdeaCentre A700 and B305 all-in-ones, vies for your desktop dollars with H320</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/">Lenovo adds touch to IdeaCentre A700 and B305 all-in-ones, vies for your desktop dollars with H320</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19472002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/lenovo-h320-and-ideacentre-a700-and-b305-all-in-ones-vie-for-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>a700</category><category>aio</category><category>all in one</category><category>all-in-one</category><category>AllInOne</category><category>amd</category><category>arrandale</category><category>athlon ii</category><category>athlon ii x4</category><category>AthlonIi</category><category>AthlonIiX4</category><category>ati</category><category>b305</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>clarkdale</category><category>core 2010</category><category>Core2010</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktop pc</category><category>DesktopPc</category><category>h320</category><category>hd 5450</category><category>Hd5450</category><category>hf 5570</category><category>Hf5570</category><category>ideacentre</category><category>ideacentre a700</category><category>ideacentre b305</category><category>IdeacentreA700</category><category>IdeacentreB305</category><category>intel core 2010</category><category>IntelCore2010</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo h320</category><category>lenovo ideacentre</category><category>LenovoH320</category><category>LenovoIdeacentre</category><category>radeon hd 5450</category><category>radeon hd 5570</category><category>RadeonHd5450</category><category>RadeonHd5570</category><category>surface acoustic wave</category><category>SurfaceAcousticWave</category><category>touchscreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/151104/2010/05/westmereex.html?lsrc=rss_main"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0507m3ubweintel.jpg" /></a></div>
Yeah yeah, "more cores and faster speeds," you've heard it all before right? That'd be our reaction too if we weren't talking about the successor to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Nehalem-Ex</a>, Intel's most gruesomely overpowered chip to date. Launched under the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> branding in March, it represents Intel's single biggest generational leap so far, and with its eight cores, sixteen threads, and 24MB of shared onboard cache, you could probably see why. Time waits for no CPU though, and Intel's planned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/intel-begins-production-of-32nm-westmere-processors/">32nm</a> Westmere-Ex successor will move things forward with an unspecified increase in both core count (speculated to be jumping up to 12) and operating frequencies, while keeping within the same power envelope. Given the current 2.26GHz default speed and 2.66GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turbo+boost">Turbo Boost</a> option of the 7500, that means we're probably looking at a 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz <em>12-core</em>, hyper-threaded processor, scheduled to land at some point next year. Time to make some apps that can use all that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">parallel processing</a> power, nay?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/">Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19468433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>eight-core</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>multicore</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>parallel processing</category><category>ParallelProcessing</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>professional</category><category>roadmap</category><category>servers</category><category>superfast</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere-ex</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 2011 CPUs require new motherboards, start saving those pennies now?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2010/04/21/intel-sandy-bridge-details-of-the-next-gen/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/4-21-10-lga1155.png" alt="" /></a></div>
Hoping Intel's 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sandy+Bridge/">Sandy Bridge</a> CPUs will unify your computing world next year? <em>Bit-tech</em> reports they may also drain your pocketbook. Anonymous sources told the site that Intel's spiffy new CPU / GPU / memory controller integrations will use two new sockets, LGA-1155 and LGA-2011; if true, you'll need to buy a new motherboard to match. Aside from packaging the aforementioned GPU and memory controller on the same die, LGA-1155 rumors don't hold any surprises thus far, but the enthusiast-grade LGA-2011 chips will supposedly sport a quad-channel DDR3 memory controller (like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Nehalem EX</a>) and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/pci-express-3-0-specifications-formally-delayed-products-pushed">long-awaited PCI Express 3.0</a> for 32 lanes of graphics-gobbling bandwidth. We also hear new southbridges will have native <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sata+6g">SATA 6G</a>. Honestly, these rumors are so tame as to be entirely credible. Let's dream up something ridiculous, like Intel actually <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/intel-says-light-peak-coming-next-year-can-and-will-coexist-wit/">supporting USB 3.0</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/">Intel's 2011 CPUs require new motherboards, start saving those pennies now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19448841/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/intels-2011-cpus-require-new-motherboards-start-saving-those-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>CPU</category><category>CPU sockets</category><category>CPUs</category><category>CpuSockets</category><category>Intel</category><category>LGA-1155</category><category>LGA-2011</category><category>on-die graphics</category><category>on-die memory controller</category><category>On-dieGraphics</category><category>On-dieMemoryController</category><category>PCI express</category><category>PCI Express 3.0</category><category>PCi-e</category><category>PCI-express</category><category>PciExpress</category><category>PciExpress3.0</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>quad-channel</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>sata 6g</category><category>SATA III</category><category>Sata6g</category><category>Sata6gbps</category><category>SataIii</category><category>sockets</category><category>USB 3.0</category><category>Usb3.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 'Huron River' 32nm laptop platform to pack WiMAX in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/17639/37/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/intel-bunny-suit-1.jpg" /></a></div>
It's not easy to be a buyer of computers with all these technology roadmaps flying about, but in case you're brave enough to peer into the future, <em>Fudzilla</em> has word on Intel's upcoming laptop chips. The "Huron River" platform will replace Calpella (the current crop of mobile chipsets), and continue Intel's fine work with WiMAX and WiFi integration, in addition to new Intel Bluetooth connectivity and that crowd-favored <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/widi">Intel Wireless Display</a>. The platform will be powered by the new Sandy Bridge 32nm processor, a followup to Nehalem's Core i Series of chips. We should be seeing this in Q1 2011, which will probably be minutes after Apple finally decides to upgrade to Core i7.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/">Intel's 'Huron River' 32nm laptop platform to pack WiMAX in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19357537/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>huron river</category><category>HuronRiver</category><category>intel</category><category>intel wireless display</category><category>IntelWirelessDisplay</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>widi</category><category>wimax</category><category>wireless display</category><category>WirelessDisplay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Fusion sampling soon, arriving in 2011 with Llano APU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3736"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/9feb10ob249n.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
To say that we've been waiting for AMD's Fusion CPU / GPU combo <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/amd-announces-conesus-netbook-platform-ati-stream-brand-fusion/">for a long time</a> would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/more-details-leak-on-amds-fusion-platform-fusion-now-officiall/">an understatement</a>. In fact, while AMD was busy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/amd-spells-out-the-future-heterogeneous-computing-bulldozer-an/">talking about it</a>, Intel swept in with its own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/arrandale">Arrandale</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/clarkdale">Clarkdale</a> chips that pack graphical and computing processing into the same chip. Lest we were discouraged, then, AMD is making a return to form with news that its first Fusion APU (Accelerated Processing Unit) is about to start sampling to manufacturers, with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/next-gen-amd-scorpius-and-lynx-desktop-platforms-leak-out-fusio/">now definite</a> 2011 launch window. Codenamed Llano, this will be a quad-core beastie with intended operating speeds of more than 3Ghz and graphics parts borrowed from ATI's successful line of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/radeon">Evergreen GPUs</a>. That means DirectX 11, a feature Intel is unlikely to match, whereas AMD will have everything Intel currently does and more, with a 32nm production process, on-die integration (rather than just the same chip packaging), and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/">power gating</a> allowing for dynamic per-core overclocking a la <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Turbo Boost</a>. It's been lonely without you AMD, now just fulfill this promise and all that absenteeism will be forgiven.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/">AMD Fusion sampling soon, arriving in 2011 with Llano APU</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19350199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/amd-fusion-sampling-soon-arriving-in-2011-with-llano-apu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>accelerated processing unit</category><category>AcceleratedProcessingUnit</category><category>amd</category><category>amd fusion</category><category>amd llano</category><category>AmdFusion</category><category>AmdLlano</category><category>apu</category><category>ati</category><category>cpu</category><category>directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>evergreen</category><category>fusion</category><category>global foundries</category><category>GlobalFoundries</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>integrated gpu</category><category>IntegratedGpu</category><category>llano</category><category>power gating</category><category>power-gating</category><category>PowerGating</category><category>processor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3733"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/4feb10intel935b.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The 32nm dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Clarkdale processors</a> that recently made <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/intel-core-i5-and-core-i3-desktop-parts-start-shipping/">their debut</a> are about to pave the way for Intel's next performance crown chaser, the six-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/gulftown">Gulftown</a>. You might've known that already, but Intel's decided to furnish us with the above slide detailing the particular differences between the two dies, with the most notable being the whopping 1.17 <em>billion</em> transistors that the new CPU will be composed of. The major attraction of Clarkdale chips lies in their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/intels-32mn-processors-show-off-power-efficiency-in-informal-pr/">power efficiency</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/intel-gma-hd-graphics-review-deems-them-excellent-for-video-med/">competent integrated GPU</a>, but the Gulftown focus will be firmly on the high end. Hence, there's no integrated graphics, but the built-in memory controller supports three channels of DDR3 RAM and even plays nice with lower-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/">1.35-volt sticks</a>. There's also confirmation that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/29/amd-and-intels-six-core-cpu-plans-revealed-by-mobo-makers/">forthcoming</a> hex-core chip will fit inside the familiar LGA-1366 socket, so if you bought a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/02/maingear-unveils-core-i7-packin-shift-your-own-personal-super/">high end Core i7</a>, worry not, you'll be able to replace your still blisteringly quick CPU with an even faster beast. Quad-core variants -- by virtue of disabling a pair of cores -- are on the cards as well, while Intel also took the opportunity to delve into questions of 1Tbps+ bandwidth interconnects and its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/11/intel-demonstrates-80-core-processor/">80-core processor project</a>, but you'll have to hit up the links below to learn more about those.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/">Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19344464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cache</category><category>clarkdale</category><category>core i</category><category>CoreI</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>gulftown</category><category>hex-core</category><category>intel</category><category>l3 cache</category><category>L3Cache</category><category>lga-1366</category><category>power gate</category><category>power gating</category><category>PowerGate</category><category>PowerGating</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>quad-core</category><category>roadmap</category><category>six-core</category><category>tera-scale</category><category>tera-scale computing</category><category>Tera-scaleComputing</category><category>westmere</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba bolsters 32nm mSATA SSD lineup, your future netbook nods approvingly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/tos/tos432.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/ssd-toshiba-nsata.jpg" /></a></div>
We like to think of 'em as the SSDs for the little guys, and we couldn't be happier to hear that they're getting bigger and bigger in terms of capacity. Toshiba introduced the first solid state drives to use the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/toshiba-announces-first-ssd-drives-using-new-mini-sata-interface/">mini-SATA interface</a> back in September of '09, and while those 32nm units were made available in 30GB and 62GB sizes, the pack rats weren't satisfied. Now, the company has introduced a 128GB flavor with an mSATA interface, offering up a maximum sequential read speed of 180MB/s and a maximum sequential write speed of 70MB/s. The 128GB modules are said be one-seventh the volume and one-eighth the weight of 2.5-inch SSDs, and in case that's not enough, the third-generation HG SSDs will bring nearly twice the aforesaid speed and will ship in capacities of 64GB, 128GB, 256GB and 512GB. Hit the source link for all the dirt... except for the pricing, naturally.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/">Toshiba bolsters 32nm mSATA SSD lineup, your future netbook nods approvingly</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19309170/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2010</category><category>CES 2010 video</category><category>Ces2010</category><category>Ces2010Video</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>mini sata</category><category>mini-sata</category><category>MiniSata</category><category>msata</category><category>nand</category><category>nand flash</category><category>nand flash memory</category><category>NandFlash</category><category>NandFlashMemory</category><category>sata</category><category>slc</category><category>solid state disk</category><category>SolidStateDisk</category><category>ssd</category><category>stores-and-shopping</category><category>Toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/core-i5-arrandale.jpg" /></div>
Whoa, Nelly! Just weeks after Intel came clean with its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/">Pine Trial nettop and netbook platform</a>, the company is today cutting loose with a few more. This go 'round, we've got the 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Arrandale/">Arrandale</a> (which consists of the Core i5 Mobile and Core i3 Mobile) heading for the laptops and the 32nm Clarkdale chips over on the desktop front. Starting with the former, most reviews found the CPU + GPU solution to be faster than rivaling Core 2 Duo + integrated GPU options, with the Core i5 being particularly potent in highly threaded applications. Better still, battery life didn't seem to take a hit even with the extra performance, though high-end, high-res gaming was still a lesson in futility when working without a discrete graphics card. Overall, the chip was a welcome addition to the fold, but we got the feeling that the first wave was priced too high and offered too little of a performance increase on the gaming side to really warrant a wholehearted recommendation. As for the Clarkdale? The Core i5 661 that everyone seemed to snag was found to be blisteringly fast, with most folks deeming it the outright champion in the dual-core realm. Unfortunately, the integrated GPU was -- again -- not awesome for hardcore gaming, and the questionable pricing didn't exactly thrill some critics. Do yourself a favor and dig into the benchmarks below -- we get the feeling we'll be seeing oodles of machines hit the wires this week with these chips within. <br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Check out the Arrandale in action after the break!<br />
<br />
<u><em>Arrandale reviews</em></u><br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-Arrandale-Core-i5-and-Core-i3-Mobile-Unveiled/?page=1">Read</a> - HotHardware<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3705">Read</a> - AnandTech<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/mobile-core-i5-arrandale,2522.html">Read</a> - Tom's Hardware<br />
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=850">Read</a> - PCPerspective<br />
<a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1169/1/">Read</a> - Legit Reviews<br />
<br />
<u><em>Clarkdale reviews</em></u><br />
<a href="http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/intel_core_i5_661/">Read</a> - NeoSeeker<br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-Clarkdale-Core-i5-Desktop-Processor-Debuts/">Read</a> - HotHardware<br />
<a href="http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/01/03/intel_westmere_32nm_clarkdale_core_i5661_review">Read</a> - HardOCP<br />
<a href="http://www.techspot.com/review/233-intel-core-i5-661/">Read</a> - TechSpot<br />
<a href="http://www.missingremote.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=4489&amp;Itemid=238">Read</a> - MissingRemote<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3704">Read</a> - AnandTech<br />
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=849">Read</a> - PCPerspective<br />
<a href="http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=874">Read</a> - Legion Hardware<br />
<a href="http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_core_i5_661/">Read</a> - Overclockers Club<br />
<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2010/01/04/intel-core-i5-661-core-i3-530-cpu-review/1">Read</a> - Bit-tech<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/">Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19301268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/intels-arrandale-and-clarkdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-for-your-en/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>arrandale</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarked</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>chip</category><category>clarkdale</category><category>core i3</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i5 Mobile</category><category>Core i5-661</category><category>core i7</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-661</category><category>CoreI5Mobile</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>cpu</category><category>intel</category><category>microchip</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>nehalem</category><category>processor</category><category>review</category><category>review roundup</category><category>reviewed</category><category>ReviewRoundup</category><category>westmere</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba announces 64GB NAND packages: Apple winks, gives a nudge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2009_12/pr1501.htm?from=RSS_PRESS&amp;uid=20091215-818e"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/091215_64gb_nand.jpg" /></a></div>
Outside of the occasional leaked roadmap, one of the best ways to predict the future of consumer electronics is by looking at the evolution of the components within. Take this Toshiba NAND package for instance. While the launch of a 64GB embedded NAND flash memory module (the highest capacity in the industry) that combines sixteen 32Gb NAND chips fabricated using 32nm manufacturing processes might sound a bit boring, consider its uses. As you'll recall from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/iphone-3g-s-gets-the-quick-and-dirty-tear-apart-treatment-alrea/">iPhone 3GS teardown</a>, Apple's lovely uses either a single 16GB or 32GB Toshiba NAND module depending on the model purchased. The fact that Toshiba is now sampling its new high-capacity chips with mass production set to begin in Q1 2010 hints at what we can expect from the next-gen iPhone rumored to have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/10/eldar-murtazin-foxconn-received-order-for-next-generation-ipho/">landed in Foxconn's lap</a>. That's enough capacity for 1,070 hours of recorded music (at a 128Kbps bit rate), 8.3 hours of 17Mbps high definition video, and 19.2 hours of 7Mbps standard definition video according to Toshiba's calculations. The iPod touch, you'll remember, differs by using a pair of NAND packages for a total of 32GB or 64GB of flash today. Anyone for a 128GB iPod touch? Check the module's internals after the break -- fascinating stuff, really.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toshiba announces 64GB NAND packages: Apple winks, gives a nudge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/">Toshiba announces 64GB NAND packages: Apple winks, gives a nudge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19281313/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/toshiba-announces-64gb-nand-packages-apple-winks-gives-a-nudge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>128GB</category><category>32nm</category><category>64gb</category><category>flash</category><category>iphone</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>nand</category><category>speculation</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://a-power.com/product-14244-0-2"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/corei3-20091209.jpg" /></a></div>
Remember Intel's budget-friendlier <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/corei3">Core i3</a> line that we've been talking about since June? Despite <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/hp-leaks-forthcoming-radeon-gpus-core-i3-cpus-hulu-and-netflix/">recent leaks</a> the company still hasn't made it officially official, but it's now <em>unofficially </em>officially thanks to a pre-order at a Canadian retailer. If you're getting a little d&eacute;j&agrave; vu right now don't worry, it isn't a glitch in the matrix; this is exactly the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/06/intel-still-wont-talk-core-i5-details-but-you-can-order-one-an/">same scenario</a> that played out with the Core i5 back in August, about a month before that proc was finally given its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/08/intels-lynnfield-processors-now-officially-official-benchmarke/">coming out party</a>. In other words, expect this 32nm chip -- with its 2.93GHz speed, 512KB of L2 cache, 4MB of L3, and $157 CAD asking price (a mere $10 lower in American) -- to be given the full press release rigmarole sometime around the new year.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/">Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19271454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.93GHz</category><category>32nm</category><category>core i3</category><category>core i3 530</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI3530</category><category>intel</category><category>intel core i3</category><category>intel core i3 530</category><category>IntelCoreI3</category><category>IntelCoreI3530</category><category>processor</category><category>westmere</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
