<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Tony Fadell calls Honeywell out on patent claims]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/"><img alt="CE-Oh no he didn't!: Tony Fadell calls Honeywell out on patent claims" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/ceohnofadell.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 423px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>Smart thermostats might not be the cut-throat world of litigation like, say, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent%2Cmobile">mobile phones</a>, but that doesn't mean the odd feather doesn't get ruffled from time to time. <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/25/ipod-fathers-unveil-their-next-project-the-nest-learning-thermo/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/25/ipod-fathers-unveil-their-next-project-the-nest-learning-thermo/">Nest</a> CEO, Tony Fadell, is understandably protective of his company's product, so when competitor <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeywell" href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeywell">Honeywell</a> laid a stack of patent infringement claims at his door, unsurprisingly he was none too pleased. How displeased? Well, enough for him to drop this clanger: "Honeywell is worse than a patent troll." Then going on to quantify with "They're trying to strangle us, and we're not going to allow that to happen." We think that makes his feelings on the matter pretty clear. Well, when you've been SVP of Apple's iPod division, it's easy to see how patience with such things might wear thin.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Tony Fadell calls Honeywell out on patent claims</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20214315/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-tony-fadell-calls-honeywell-out-on-patent-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>honeywell</category><category>nest</category><category>patent</category><category>Tony Fadell</category><category>TonyFadell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Stephen Elop says 'Apple created Android,' the conditions necessary for its existence]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/elop-stephen-nokia-small.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a>Nokia's freshman CEO is speaking at the Open Mobile Summit right now. As expected, he's covering the same ol' ground, explaining why Nokia ditched Symbian and MeeGo to build the "third ecosystem" with Microsoft -- you know, after totally dominating the high-end smartphone market just three years ago. He's also being credited with the following quote:
<blockquote>
	<p>
		"Apple created Android, or at least created the conditions necessary for Android to come into being"</p>
</blockquote>
We're on to you, Mr. Elop. It's a classic diversionary tactic. Get the one and two smartphone / tablet OS vendors squabbling and then execute a flanking maneuver while nobody's watching. Why else would the Nokia CEO make such an emotive claim? Unless it's true?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Stephen Elop says 'Apple created Android,' the conditions necessary for its existence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19962516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-stephen-elop-says-apple-created-android-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>google</category><category>ios</category><category>nokia</category><category>oms</category><category>oms 2011</category><category>Oms2011</category><category>open mobile summit</category><category>Open Office</category><category>OpenMobileSummit</category><category>OpenOffice</category><category>stephen elop</category><category>StephenElop</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: BMW exec says electric vehicles 'won't work,' but would love to sell you one anyway]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/bmw-odonnell.jpg" /></a></div>
Jim O'Donnell, CEO and chairman of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bmw">BMW</a> North America, recently sat down with the <em>Detroit News</em> to discuss the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/activee">ActiveE</a> -- an electric version of BMW's 1 Series coupe, available for lease in the US this fall. Most CEOs would've probably used the opportunity to wax PR poetic about their company's bold, forward-looking ethos, because that's what CEOs do. O'Donnell, however, used the occasion to let us in on a dirty little secret: EVs don't actually <em>work</em>. According to O'Donnell's undoubtedly robust calculations, EVs won't work for "at least 90-percent" of the human population, at current battery ranges. The situation is so dire, in fact, that the US government shouldn't even bother wasting its $7,500 tax credits on frivolous things like innovation, national security and clean air. <blockquote>
<div>"I believe in a free economy. I think we should abolish all tax credits. What they are doing is putting a bet on technology, which is not appropriate. As a taxpayer, I am not sure this is the right way to go."</div>
</blockquote>O'Donnell went on to say he's "far more optimistic" about diesel's chances of increasing BMW's US market share -- because, you know, it's not like the oil industry gets any tax breaks, or anything. And it's not like diverting some money away from oil subsidies and putting it toward EV technology would create the "level playing field" that O'Donnell and his company so desperately need. No siree, the US energy market is just as pure and fair as it's always been -- and it certainly doesn't deserve to be corrupted by an EV tax credit pestilence. That said, O'Donnell would still <em>really</em> appreciate it if we buy the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bmw,i3">battery-powered i3</a> when it launches in 2013. Who knows? He may even throw in a free bridge, too.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: BMW exec says electric vehicles 'won't work,' but would love to sell you one anyway</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19923607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-bmw-exec-says-electric-vehicles-wont-work/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activee</category><category>ActiveE Concept</category><category>ActiveeConcept</category><category>auto</category><category>battery</category><category>big oil</category><category>BigOil</category><category>bmw</category><category>BMW 1 Series</category><category>bmw ceo</category><category>bmw north america</category><category>Bmw1Series</category><category>BmwCeo</category><category>BmwNorthAmerica</category><category>car</category><category>ceo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>Detroit</category><category>diesel</category><category>Electric car</category><category>electric vehicle</category><category>ElectricCar</category><category>ElectricVehicle</category><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>EV</category><category>green</category><category>i3</category><category>jim odonnell</category><category>JimOdonnell</category><category>lease</category><category>oil</category><category>politics</category><category>subsidies</category><category>Tax Credit</category><category>TaxCredit</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: NGP will be 'dead on arrival,' says ngmoco boss]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/11x0303b8ngp.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
In all honesty, you would <em>expect</em> the leader of a team concerned exclusively with producing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/25/gyroscope-gunning-on-the-iphone-4-with-eliminate-gun-range-vid/">games</a> for smartphone platforms like iOS and Android to be dismissive of a new dedicated handheld console's chances, but it's still jarring to hear such a strident dismissal of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/the-sony-psp2/">Sony NGP</a>'s chances. In an interview at GDC this year -- yes, the same place where we were treated to some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/02/sonys-ngp-at-gdc-2011-more-video-of-the-quad-core-marvel-in-ac/">very impressive</a> demos of the NGP's performance -- ngmoco CEO Neil Young has expressed his belief that Sony's next PSP will be "dead on arrival." Claiming that the new portable will be incapable of competing with the rich ecosystems and affordable pricing models that smartphones now offer, Young says not even the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/sonys-ngp-psp2-has-a-quad-core-arm-cortex-a9-processor/">crazy specs</a> or PS3-like gaming will help the NGP survive. This echoes comments from Satoru Iwata last year saying that Apple, not Sony, is the "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/nintendo-ceo-battle-with-sony-is-over-apple-is-the-enemy-of-t/">enemy of the future</a>" for handheld consoles, though Young does close off on a positive note, saying that he sees brighter prospects for the 3DS thanks to Nintendo's rich collection of own-brand franchises and reserves of fan loyalty. So that's it, folks, better start selling those Sony shares while they're still worth something! Or not, it's up to you.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Dominick]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: NGP will be 'dead on arrival,' says ngmoco boss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Mar 2011 03:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19866207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ngp-will-be-dead-on-arrival-says-ngmoco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3ds</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohno he didnt</category><category>CeohnoHeDidnt</category><category>dead on arrival</category><category>DeadOnArrival</category><category>doa</category><category>gaming</category><category>gdc</category><category>gdc 2011</category><category>Gdc2011</category><category>handheld gaming</category><category>HandheldGaming</category><category>neil young</category><category>NeilYoung</category><category>ngmoco</category><category>ngp</category><category>nintendo 3ds</category><category>Nintendo3ds</category><category>portable console</category><category>portable gaming</category><category>PortableConsole</category><category>PortableGaming</category><category>psp</category><category>psp 2</category><category>Psp2</category><category>quote</category><category>quoted</category><category>smack</category><category>sony ngp</category><category>SonyNgp</category><category>trash talk</category><category>TrashTalk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 03:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: INQ chief says Android is too geeky for 'pretty girls']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/11x021867gv3ef.jpg" /></a></div>
Take one dose of improper generalization, mix it in with a heaping of condescension, and then add a pinch of good old sexism. What do you get? This quote, coming from Frank Meehan, CEO of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/10/inq-cloud-touch-preview/">Android handset</a>-making <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/inq">INQ</a>:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>"If you go to a nightclub in any city in the world, the pretty girl has an iPhone or a BlackBerry. She doesn't have an Android phone. She has no emotional attachment to an Android phone. It's too complicated. It's a geek device, it's all wrong."</div>
</blockquote> Now, before you go emailing him photos of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/04/android-tattoo-girl/">Android tattoo girl</a>, there is undeniably some smidgen of truth to the man's words. Android <em>is</em> a geek's dream ecosystem and it's not necessarily the most accessible platform in the world, but to completely write it off for the nightclub-going lady demographic doesn't strike us -- or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/18/celebity-nerds-justin-timberlake-secret-android-lover/">Justin Timberlake</a>, or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/motorola-xoom-lands-in-chad-ochocincos-safe-hands-is-pretty-a/">Chad Ochocinco</a> -- as the most astute idea in the world.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, AC]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: INQ chief says Android is too geeky for 'pretty girls'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19850393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-inq-chief-says-android-is-too-geeky-for-pr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>blackberry</category><category>boss</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>chief</category><category>complicated</category><category>frank meehan</category><category>FrankMeehan</category><category>geek</category><category>girls</category><category>inq</category><category>inq ceo</category><category>InqCeo</category><category>iphone</category><category>ladies</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>preference</category><category>quote</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Netgear boss calls 'game over' for Microsoft, Jobs' 'ego' reason iPhone doesn't support Flash (updated)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/patrick-lo-ces-2008-small.jpg" /></a>Can't say that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/live-from-netgears-ces-press-conference/">Patrick Lo</a> is a name that immediately rang any bells around here. He's certainly not as recognizable as Netgear, the company that he chairs and rules supreme. But boy did he hit our radar screens this morning. Lo had plenty of criticism to spread around the Microsoft and Apple camps today during a press lunch in Sydney. Oh where to even begin? Let's start with Microsoft, and Lo's claim that, "Microsoft is over -- game over, from my point of view," when comparing Windows Phone 7's chance to compete with Android and the iPhone. Doubtful, not with Redmond's Windows 7 and MS Office cash cows <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/microsoft-to-spend-one-billion-dollars-advertising-kinect-and-wi/">fueling</a> Microsoft's intense desire to execute on its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/03/steve-ballmer-at-d8-the-video-highlights/">mobile strategy</a>.<br />
<br />
Lo then turned his sights on Apple, having this to say on the topic of Steve Jobs' refusal to support Adobe Flash on Apple's mobile devices: "What's the reason for him to trash Flash? There's no reason other than ego." Funny, we thought it was due to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/steve-jobs-publishes-some-thoughts-on-flash-many-many-thou/">performance, security, and power consumption</a> issues. Lo later added, "Once Steve Jobs goes away, which is probably not far away, then Apple will have to make a strategic decision on whether to open up the platform." Classy. Hit the source link below if you're just dying to hear how "closed" systems are inferior to "open" systems all over again.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: We just received an email from Patrick Lo. While he continues to support his opinions expressed on open standards, he is backtracking from some of the comments. Notably, he regrets some of the words chosen, particularly those that seem related to Steve Jobs' health. Full apology after the break.<br type="_moz" /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CE-Oh no he didn't!: Netgear boss calls 'game over' for Microsoft, Jobs' 'ego' reason iPhone doesn't support Flash (updated)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Netgear boss calls 'game over' for Microsoft, Jobs' 'ego' reason iPhone doesn't support Flash (updated)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19821497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-netgear-boss-calls-game-over-for-microsof/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adobe</category><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>close</category><category>flash</category><category>ios</category><category>microsoft</category><category>netgear</category><category>open</category><category>patrick lo</category><category>PatrickLo</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>windows phone</category><category>windows phone 7</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone7</category><category>wp7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple on iPad competition: Windows is 'big and heavy,' next-gen Android tablets are still vapor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/verizon-iphone-1061-1295390709.jpg" /></a></div>
Apple's COO (and current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/steve-jobs-takes-medical-leave-from-apple-tim-cook-taking-over/">Steve Jobs stand-in</a>) Tim Cook thinks "there's not much" competition to the company's iPad tablet. When <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-turns-in-record-q1-6b-profit-on-26-7b-revenue-16-2m-ip/">queried</a> about Apple's view on what the rest of the market offers, Cook was brutally candid in describing Windows-driven machines as generally being big, heavy and expensive, while current generations of Android-based slates are in his opinion merely "scaled-up smartphones." While we agree that Windows 7 isn't a terribly touch-friendly affair, we don't know that Cook's comments on Android are quite so pertinent now that Google's tablet-savvy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/googles-android-3-0-honeycomb-for-tablets-a-guided-tour-of-the/">Honeycomb</a> iteration has been unveiled. Then again, he has something to say about the next generation of Android tablets as well, noting that the ones announced at CES lack pricing and release schedules, leading him to conclude that "today they're <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/vaporware">vapor</a>." Ouch. As a parting shot, Tim took a moment to reaffirm Apple's belief that its integrated approach will always trump the fragmented nature of Android and its plurality of app stores. Hear his comments in full after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple on iPad competition: Windows is 'big and heavy,' next-gen Android tablets are still vapor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/">Apple on iPad competition: Windows is 'big and heavy,' next-gen Android tablets are still vapor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19805924/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/apple-on-ipad-competition-windows-is-big-and-heavy-android-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011</category><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>apple inc</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>AppleInc</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohnohedidnt</category><category>coo</category><category>earnings</category><category>financials</category><category>fragmentation</category><category>fragmented</category><category>integrated</category><category>ios</category><category>ipad</category><category>q1</category><category>q1 2011</category><category>Q12011</category><category>quarterly</category><category>quote</category><category>results</category><category>tim cook</category><category>TimCook</category><category>vapor</category><category>vaporware</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE Oh no he didn't!: Time Warner chief likens Netflix threat to Albanian army]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/albaniannetflixarmy.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">Think the relationship between Netflix and cable and content executives is amicable? Not. Even. Close. Certainly not after Netflix CEO Reed Hastings blazed a trail into the living room on the strength of the company's streaming television and movie content originally made possible by a <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2008/10/01/starz-play-content-added-to-netflixs-streaming-library/">shrewd 2008 deal</a> with Starz. A move that netted streaming access rights to Sony and Disney content for an estimated $25 million -- next to nothing compared to the traditional licensing fees charged to cable operators. That deal is set to expire in 2011 and could cost Netflix as much as $250 million a year to renew. Time Warner CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Jeff%20Bewkes">Jeff Bewkes</a> thinks that Netflix's days at the top are numbered having been made possible by an era of experimentation that's now ending. "It's a little bit like, is the Albanian army going to take over the world?" said Bewkes, "I don't think so." According to the <em>New York Times</em>, the comments were made last week as UBS sponsored a media conference in New York that it says turned into a "platform for executives to express their grievances and emphasize that they will now aggressively try to tilt the economic balance between Netflix and content creators back toward the media conglomerates." Wow. Don't worry though Netflix subscribers, we're sure that the implied collusion is the good kind.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/">CE Oh no he didn't!: Time Warner chief likens Netflix threat to Albanian army</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19757732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/13/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-time-warner-chief-likens-netflix-threat-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOh</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>content</category><category>content deals</category><category>ContentDeals</category><category>jeff bewkes</category><category>JeffBewkes</category><category>jeffrey bewkes</category><category>JeffreyBewkes</category><category>netflix</category><category>netflix watch instantly</category><category>NetflixStreaming</category><category>NetflixWatchInstantly</category><category>starz</category><category>streaming</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>ubs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: NVIDIA chief calls Galaxy Tab 'a large phone,' can't wait to show you some real tablets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/10x1112oiub33f.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
We've literally been waiting for Tegra 2 tablets <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/nvidia-announces-tegra-2-tablets-coming/">since CES in January</a>, but that isn't stopping NVIDIA boss Jen-Hsun Huang from extolling their virtues yet again, this time on a roadmap that points to just after <em>next year</em>'s CES. In his company's most recent quarterly results call, Huang was bullish about the disruptive potential of tablets, but insisted that they can't simply be built like the Galaxy Tab (or the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-folio-100-preview/">Folio 100</a>, for that matter), which uses a smartphone OS stretched out to a larger screen. "A tablet is not a large phone," says Huang, and he's of course <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/20/lenovo-says-no-android-tablet-in-us-until-honeycomb-no-windows/">not alone</a> in expressing frustration with Android's current immaturity for the tablet realm, but once Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/google-android-2-2-not-designed-for-the-tablet-form-factor/">slate-friendly OS update</a> drops, he promises NVIDIA will be ready to capitalize: "Our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/03/lg-pad-coming-in-early-2011-with-android-honeycomb-dual-core-t/">tablet</a> and phone business is going to ramp. And it's going to ramp hard." We're looking forward to all this ramping, oh yes we are.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>Later on the call, Jen-Hsun Huang dropped a bit of knowledge on his listeners, showing Apple's iPad some love. "You can't just put an operating system on a tablet and hope that -- on a piece of glass -- and hope that you can compete against the iPad. The iPad is a wonderful product, and if you're going to give that wonderful product a run for its money, you'd better build something absolutely exquisite." Huzzah!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: NVIDIA chief calls Galaxy Tab 'a large phone,' can't wait to show you some real tablets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19713878/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/12/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-chief-calls-galaxy-tab-a-large-phon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android tablets</category><category>AndroidTablets</category><category>boss</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>chief</category><category>future</category><category>galaxy tab</category><category>GalaxyTab</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>jen-hsun huang</category><category>Jen-hsunHuang</category><category>nvidia</category><category>plans</category><category>quote</category><category>roadmap</category><category>soc</category><category>tab</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>tegra</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>Tegra2</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Anssi Vanjoki says using Android is like peeing in your pants for warmth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/10x0921oub243tnassiln.jpg" /></a>You've been asking and imploring, so <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/anssivanjoki">Anssi Vanjoki</a> -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nokia-vp-n97-taught-company-some-tough-lessons/">straight shooter</a>, that he is -- now has an answer. Why doesn't Nokia switch to Android? Because Google's software represents only a short-term solution that will lead to bigger quandaries down the line, says he. Anssi was even graceful enough to illustrate this point with a vivid example, saying that mobile manufacturers who go the Android route are doing no better than Finnish boys who "pee in their pants" for warmth in the winter. Yeah. We don't know where to go from here either. To be honest, there's a legitimate point behind this trash talk, as the <em>FT</em> notes some analysts agree with Anssi that relying on Android as the universal OS may lead to "permanently low profitability" with users failing to distinguish among different brands if they all offer the same experience. Then again, tell that to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/htc-quarterly-profits-improve-by-a-third-beat-even-its-own-loft/">HTC</a>. <br />
<br />
[Thanks, Maark]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Anssi Vanjoki says using Android is like peeing in your pants for warmth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19642281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-anssi-vanjoki-says-using-android-is-like-pe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android os</category><category>AndroidOs</category><category>anssi</category><category>anssi vanjoki</category><category>AnssiVanjoki</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohno he didnt</category><category>CeohnoHeDidnt</category><category>executive</category><category>google</category><category>nokia</category><category>quote</category><category>smartphones</category><category>trash talk</category><category>TrashTalk</category><category>vp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: IBM's Palmisano says HP 'used to be' an inventive company]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/10x0916palmisanowerub.jpg" /></a></div>
The finest putdowns are usually the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/">simplest</a>. To wit, check out IBM's Chief Executive Trashtalker, Samuel Palmisano, whose elegant use of the past tense relegates HP's current status to that of a mere has-been innovator. Now, says Sam, HP is forced to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/01/hp-palm-buyout-officially-complete-get-ready-for-webos-prin/">acquire new companies</a> just to keep up, thanks in part to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/hp-ceo-mark-hurd-resigns-over-sexual-harassment-investigation/">Mark Hurd</a>'s slashing of investment in research and development. Speaking of Hurd, Palmisano also thinks HP failed its investors by handing him a fat <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/former-hp-ceo-mark-hurd-rewarded-with-a-12m-severance-after-bei/">severance package</a> as he promptly jumped ship to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/hp-sues-former-ceo-mark-hurd-doesnt-want-him-working-at-oracle/">Larry Ellison's Oracle loveboat</a>. Another reason why Palmisano isn't worried about HP is that he sees the PC era as already over, describing IBM's sale of its PC business to Lenovo as an act of foresight, and adding that he "couldn't give it away today." Clearly they don't mince their words over at International Business Machines.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: IBM's Palmisano says HP 'used to be' an inventive company</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19635708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-ibms-palmisano-says-hp-used-to-be-an-inv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohnohedidnt</category><category>chairman</category><category>chief</category><category>criticism</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>ibm</category><category>innovation</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>interview</category><category>mark hurd</category><category>MarkHurd</category><category>palmisano</category><category>sam palmisano</category><category>SamPalmisano</category><category>samuel palmisano</category><category>SamuelPalmisano</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Acer founder characterizes Apple as a mutant virus]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/stanshih09092010-1284037315.jpg" /></a></div>
Wow, a mutant virus? This analogy may sound like a ringing bell for another <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CeOhNoHeDidnt/">cat fight</a> on the playground, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/acer">Acer</a> founder and retired chairman Stan Shih is actually semi-praising <a href="http://ww.engadget.com/tag/apple">Apple</a> here. Speaking at the launch of an Acer touch-themed design competition, Shih said that while Apple's taking the "revolution" highway to tackle the PC market, Acer's success has always depended on its time-consuming but more pragmatic "evolution" strategy, and it'll keep doing so to lay the ground for the next 30 years or so. Here's how <em>China Times </em>paraphrased Shih:<blockquote>
<div>"Apple is like a mutant virus, escaping from the traditional structure of the PC industry, but the industry will still eventually build up immunity, thus further blocking this trend, and we believe the size of the non-Apple camp will exceed Apple's, because this is how the industry normally evolves."</div>
</blockquote>Assuming the second half of Shih's quote refers to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tablet">tablet</a> market share, this certainly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/acers-jt-wang-ipads-market-share-will-drop-to-about-20-percen/">echoes</a> the words of his good friend JT Wang. That said, this is also the man who's boldly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/">predicted</a> that all American PC brands will be gone within 20 years, but there's no promise that Apple won't be kicking out a few more revolutions in the coming years. Anyway, doesn't Acer have more to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/">worry</a> about for the mean time?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Acer founder characterizes Apple as a mutant virus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19626675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-acer-founder-characterizes-apple-as-a-mutan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acer</category><category>acer founder</category><category>AcerFounder</category><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>evolution</category><category>founder</category><category>mutant virus</category><category>MutantVirus</category><category>pc maker</category><category>pc manufacturer</category><category>PcMaker</category><category>PcManufacturer</category><category>quote</category><category>revolution</category><category>stan shih</category><category>StanShih</category><category>taiwan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Foursquare's Crowley calls Places 'boring,' becomes mayor of Bittersville]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="CE-Oh no he didn't!: Foursquare's Crowley calls Facebook Places 'boring,' becomes mayor of Bittersville" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dennis-crowley-2010-08-23-500.jpg" /></a></div>
You don't have to make a physical product to be a snippy CEO, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/foursquare">Foursquare</a> co-founder and chief officer Dennis Crowley is proving that. He's been playing with the recently launched <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/19/facebook-3-2-for-iphone-adds-places-location-check-in-with-fours/">Facebook Places</a>, saying "it's not that great or interesting," and that it offers "barely any incentives for users to keep coming back and telling their friends where they are." We're going to go ahead and figure that's because Facebook isn't in the business of making games, rather in creating APIs that let <em>others</em> create games that capture the minds and the clicks of its teeming masses of users. In other words, don't be surprised if mafiosos start competing to become Dons of this or that Italian joint, virtual farmers rush to plant their crops in the most verdant fields in your neighborhood, and your Feed gets way more annoying than you ever thought possible.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Foursquare's Crowley calls Places 'boring,' becomes mayor of Bittersville</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19603995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-foursquares-crowley-calls-places-boring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook places</category><category>FacebookPlaces</category><category>foursquare</category><category>social network</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: LG's Ma promises Optimus tablet 'will be better than the iPad']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0705o91b341lg.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
There's brave talk, there's foolish talk, and then there's the 5nm line that separates the two. While LG's Chang Ma didn't seem to be dabbling in either during <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/19/lg-talks-up-optimus-smartphone-line-10-devices-by-year-end-nvi/">yesterday's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> interview</a>, some subsequent revelations from the financial paper do quote him straying into daring new territory. Having already described the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/05/lg-confirms-android-tablet-for-q4-2010-launch-teases-android-2/">upcoming Optimus tablet</a> as something that will surprise us with its productivity and focus on content creation, LG's Marketing VP (we know, not exactly the CEO) has apparently gone the full way and straight up claimed that "our tablet will be better than the iPad." We'll let you judge on which side of the brave/foolish divide that falls, but it's certainly an indication of searing ambition on LG's part, and should, together with the promise that the US will be "a key market" for the tablet, make pleasant reading for Android slate aficionados.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: LG's Ma promises Optimus tablet 'will be better than the iPad'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19601476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-lgs-ma-promises-optimus-tablet-will-be-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android tablet</category><category>AndroidTablet</category><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ceohno</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>chang ma</category><category>ChangMa</category><category>ipad</category><category>lg</category><category>lg optimus</category><category>LgOptimus</category><category>optimus</category><category>tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ReQuest threatens to enable DVD piracy on its media streamers, announces one sans DVD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-i/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-26-10-request-mediaplayer.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Enjoy copying DVDs onto $5,000 boutique home servers? If you've got the dough, <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/tag/ReQuest/">ReQuest</a> has got you covered -- CEO Peter Cholnoky says that even if California courts make the practice illegal, his firm isn't afraid to push back. When <em>CE Pro</em> asked whether he was concerned about the fallout from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/13/kaleidescape-gets-in-line-behind-realdvd-for-rough-treatment/">Kaleidescape lawsuit</a>, he said, "Nope, should I be?" adding that ReQuest could convert <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2008/08/29/request-intros-media-servin-intelligent-media-client/">existing equipment</a> to use third-party DVD-copying software "in two seconds" should the courts try to shut him down. Given that the company's new $1,200 MediaPlayer (above) doesn't have the requisite DVD drive for ripping discs anyhow, that sounds an awful lot like braggadocio, but we have to say we love Peter's stick-it-to-the-man tone. Oh, and in case you're wondering, that MediaPlayer is slated to ship in June; you'll find a full spec sheet at our source link.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/">ReQuest threatens to enable DVD piracy on its media streamers, announces one sans DVD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 27 May 2010 19:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19493062/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/request-threatens-to-enable-dvd-piracy-on-its-media-streamers-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>dvd</category><category>dvd copy</category><category>dvd copying</category><category>dvd ripping</category><category>DvdCopy</category><category>DvdCopying</category><category>DvdRipping</category><category>fair use</category><category>FairUse</category><category>Kaleidescape</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>media server</category><category>media streamer</category><category>MediaPlayer</category><category>MediaServer</category><category>MediaStreamer</category><category>ReQuest</category><category>ReQuest MediaPlayer</category><category>RequestMediaplayer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Sony's Sir Howard says 'when you beat Apple, you're dominating']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="live_update" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" class="live_image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/google-io-2010-2-0930-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Sony CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/howardstringer">Sir Howard Stringer</a> has always been delightfully direct, and he didn't hold back at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/googleio2010">Google's I/O</a> conference: talking about Sony Ericsson with Eric Schmidt during the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/google-tv-turns-on-at-i-o/">Google TV</a> launch, Sir Howard noted that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xperiax10">Xperia X10</a> is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-is-likely-ntt-docomos-best-selling-sma/">best-selling handset in Japan</a>, and that "when you beat Apple, you're dominating -- it's the new definition." Strong words from a gadget titan -- we'll leave it to you to debate their veracity.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Sony's Sir Howard says 'when you beat Apple, you're dominating'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 14:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19485401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-sir-howard-says-when-you-beat-apple-youre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no</category><category>ce-oh-no-he-didnt</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>google</category><category>howard stringer</category><category>HowardStringer</category><category>japan</category><category>sir howard stringer</category><category>SirHowardStringer</category><category>sony</category><category>sony ericsson</category><category>SonyEricsson</category><category>x10</category><category>xperia x10</category><category>XperiaX10</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Nokia's Anssi Vanjoki thinks cameraphones are about to make SLRs obsolete]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idCNLDE63J15F20100420?rpc=44"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/21apr10nokia924nof3567.jpg" /></a></div>
From what we know of Anssi Vanjoki, he's a great guy and one that isn't afraid of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/nokia-vp-n97-taught-company-some-tough-lessons/">admitting his company's mistakes</a>. Alas, now we can also add to that dossier the ignominious fact that the fella doesn't seem to know how professional cameras work. Talking about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/new-samsung-chips-bring-hd-image-sensors-to-slimmer-smarter-mob/">rapid improvement</a> in cameraphone technology during a speech in Helsinki yesterday, Vanjoki said that very soon "there will be no need to carry around those heavy lenses." He's really enthusiastic about HD video coming to phones, which he predicts will be here within 12 months (if you ask Sony Ericsson, it's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/sony-ericsson-vivaz-review/">here already</a>), but we just can't let that spectacular line about lenses slide. The glass you shoot through is, for a lot of people, <em>the</em> most important piece of photographic equipment and there are genuine reasons why said lenses are heavy, elongated, and typically unfriendly to pockets. Then again, this dude also thought the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/n-gage">N-Gage</a> was gonna be a success, so don't start selling off that glass stockpile just yet.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Nokia's Anssi Vanjoki thinks cameraphones are about to make SLRs obsolete</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19448095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nokias-anssi-vanjoki-thinks-cameraphones-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anssi Vanjoki</category><category>AnssiVanjoki</category><category>cameraphone</category><category>cameraphones</category><category>cameras</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohnohedidnt</category><category>digital slr</category><category>DigitalSlr</category><category>dslr</category><category>executive vp</category><category>ExecutiveVp</category><category>finland</category><category>helsinki</category><category>nokia</category><category>slr</category><category>system cameras</category><category>SystemCameras</category><category>vice president</category><category>VicePresident</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-oh no he didn't!: Reggie Fils-Aime says the iPhone OS isn't a 'viable profit platform for game development']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<!--end post_byline-->
<div class="post_content_types">
<div class="post_category"> </div>
<!--end post_category--></div>
<!--end post_content_types--> <!--end post_info--> <!--BLOG POST BODY: image, blurb, &amp; readmore link-->
<div class="post_body"><!-- surphace start --><a href="http://kotaku.com/5509655/"><em><img border="1" align="right" vspace="16" hspace="4" alt="Reggie Fils-Aime" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/02/200px-Reginald_Fils-Aime.jpg" /></em></a></div>
We can't say we'd expect Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aime to lavish praise on iPhone OS gaming and the abilities of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a>, but we figured everyone had to at least acknowledge the effect of Apple's handhelds on the market and the potential of its tablet, you know? Nope -- ol' Reg just told <i>Kotaku</i> that Apple "is not having an impact on Nintendo when you look at our business, our volume, our hardware, our software," and that "clearly it doesn't look like their platform is a viable profit platform for game development because so many of the games are free versus paid downloads." Snap -- although we'd bet plenty of top-tier iPhone game devs like ngmoco would argue that their "freemium" model is working plenty okay. That's not all, though, as Reggie also had some choice words about depth: "If our games represent a range between snacks of entertainment and full meals depending on the type of game, (Apple's) aren't even a mouthful, in terms of the gaming experience you get." Double snap -- we'll leave it to you to argue that one out.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/">CE-oh no he didn't!: Reggie Fils-Aime says the iPhone OS isn't a 'viable profit platform for game development'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19430082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/ce-oh-no-he-didn-t-reggie-fils-aime-says-the-iphone-os-isnt-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>games</category><category>ipad</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone gaming</category><category>iphone os</category><category>IphoneGaming</category><category>IphoneOs</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>nintendo</category><category>reggie fils aime</category><category>reggie fils-aime</category><category>ReggieFils-aime</category><category>ReggieFilsAime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't!: Katzenberg says 'beautifully styled' 3D glasses won't make you look like a dweeb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/03/dreamworks-animation-ceo-jeffrey-katzenberg-talks-up-3d-in-the-home/1"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/10mar10katzen998800mm.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Another day, another CEO with more lip gloss than brain matter. Jeffrey Katzenberg has been talking to <em>USA Today</em> on what seems to be his favorite topic these days, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3d">3D</a>, and telling us that the glasses ain't no big deal. After all, "many many many people" wear glasses -- that's three lots of many for those keeping count at home -- and the new and improved 3D appendages are so "beautifully styled" that he expects them to start popping up at your local optometrist right next to the sunglasses and designer eyewear isles. In fact, this dude's sipping the corporate firewater so hard, we half-expect him to tell us that 3D offers "very high value" for money or ... wait, he said that too? Alright, we give up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/">CE-Oh no he didn't!: Katzenberg says 'beautifully styled' 3D glasses won't make you look like a dweeb</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19390982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-katzenberg-says-beautifully-styled-3d-gla/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>3d glasses</category><category>3dGlasses</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohnohedidnt</category><category>dreamsworks ceo</category><category>DreamsworksCeo</category><category>dreamworks</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>glasses</category><category>jeffrey katzenberg</category><category>JeffreyKatzenberg</category><category>katzenberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXVIII: Only Apple and dope smokers claim to know the future of tablets, says Dell VP]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/18/dell-goes-small-in-tablets-as-it-prepares-ipad-competition/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&amp;mod="><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/excher-thode-rm-eng.jpg" /></a>What we'd normally brush off as pretty standard mainstream tech piece became comedy gold thanks to the acerbic wit of Dell's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/johnthode">John Thode</a>. The VP of mobile devices was discussing its companies entry into the tablet industry (all the while promoting the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Mini5/">Mini 5</a>, of course) and seemed to downplay Apple's iPad momentum.
<meta charset="utf-8"> "It's really hard to kind of do the same thing over again twice or three times... [Apple] is going to have more competition here." A rational statement, but here's where it gets interesting: "If anybody tells you they know exactly what's going to happen here, they're either Apple, or they're smoking dope." Don't tell John, but we hear Gartner just hired the entire cast and crew of Dazed and Confused for a special analytics department.</meta><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXVIII: Only Apple and dope smokers claim to know the future of tablets, says Dell VP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19364632/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/18/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxviii-only-apple-and-dope-smokers-cla/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no</category><category>ce-oh-no-he-didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>dell</category><category>dope</category><category>ipad</category><category>john thode</category><category>JohnThode</category><category>mini 5</category><category>Mini5</category><category>pot</category><category>thode</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't? Part LXVII: Steve Jobs lashes out at Google, calls Adobe 'lazy']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/apple-creation-0043-rm-eng.jpg" /></a></div>
According to a report in <em>Wired</em> (and a source whom the publication says "could not be named"), Steve Jobs spoke to an audience of Apple employees at a town hall in Cupertino and... pulled zero punches. If you believe what you read, Jobs tackled a handful of major issues that have been buzzing the company lately, namely its run-ins with Google on a number of topics, and the lack of Flash support in its mobile devices (most notably in the upcoming iPad). On Google, Jobs had this to say: "We did not enter the search business. They entered the phone business. Make no mistake they want to kill the iPhone. We won't let them." According to the attendee, another topic was brought up but Steve wouldn't let the Google issue go, stating his thoughts on the company's famous 'Don't be evil' line. In Steve's words? "It's bullshit."<br />
<br />
Furthermore Jobs had a handful of choice words for Adobe, calling the company "lazy" and claiming that "Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it's because of Flash. No one will be using Flash. The world is moving to HTML5." Of course, these amazing nuggets of wisdom come from a source which Engadget cannot verify, so it's possible there are misquotes or items taken out of context, though from the sounds of things, this kind of talk falls right in line with what we'd expect from the man who said Microsoft "had no taste" and makes "really third-rate products." We eagerly await Eric Schmidt's response.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/">CE-Oh no he didn't? Part LXVII: Steve Jobs lashes out at Google, calls Adobe 'lazy'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19339025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvii-steve-jobs-lashes-out-at-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adobe</category><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>flash</category><category>google</category><category>html5</category><category>ipad</category><category>rumor</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXVI: Acer founder predicts extinction of US PC makers within 20 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iZVGfFmnYTrWvroB5c3byx_lpBmg"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/19jan10ou2b45v.jpg" /></a></div>
Oh, this is as tasty as it is salacious. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/acer">Acer</a> founder and former chairman (now retired) Stan Shih has come out with the bold prediction that US computer brands are on the way out -- if they do not adjust to the new reality of a PC market focused on low cost. When asked how he foresees Acer and ASUS establishing their brand credentials in the USA when they're engaged in constant price wars, Shih resolutely stated that lowering costs and prices is <em>the</em> way to do it. Drawing an analogy to the fate of US television brands (pow!), Shih pointed out his belief that American vendors aren't capable (slap!) of delivering the sort of affordability that the market is set to permanently demand. As harsh as his words may be, let's not forget Acer recently <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/acer-partially-fulfills-prophecy-overtakes-dell-as-number-two-p/">jumped Dell for the number two spot</a> in volume of global sales, so let's not ignore what may in fact be prophecy rather than mere prattle.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXVI: Acer founder predicts extinction of US PC makers within 20 years</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19321946/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxvi-acer-founder-predicts-extinction/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acer</category><category>acer founder</category><category>AcerFounder</category><category>affordability</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceohno</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>china</category><category>computer makers</category><category>ComputerMakers</category><category>extinction</category><category>founder</category><category>pc makers</category><category>PcMakers</category><category>stan shih</category><category>StanShih</category><category>taiwan</category><category>usa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/23/symbian-executives-rips-into-googles-android/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct2609symbianlewill.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Strap yourselves in, folks, we're about to launch the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CeOhNoHeDidnt/">Mudslinger 3000</a> again and figure out if any of it sticks. Lee Williams of Symbian starts off with a few attack volleys relating to Google's "fragmentation" of UI elements, and the resultant closed APIs being a nightmare to code for. With so many divergent UI elements and styles, he argues, developers would suffer, and the consequence would be a less vibrant app ecosystem. His major gripe with Google's mobile OS, though, has to do with the pervasive "cookie-ing" of customers, which raises the specter of privacy concerns. When asked directly by our buddy Om Malik whether he considers Android "more evil" than Apple's iPhone OS, Williams replied:<br />
<blockquote><em>"I don't view Apple as evil, they're just greedy... Google, come on! When you have to say in your motto that we're not evil, right away the first question in my mind is, 'why do you have to tell me that?'"</em><br />
</blockquote> All this must be tempered by the knowledge that Android is set to overtake <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/22/htc-adopting-android-on-50-of-its-handsets-in-2010/">large swathes</a> of the mobile OS space, and some retaliatory trash talking is probably to be expected from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/">incumbent smartphone leader</a>. Om does ask another sage question, in querying <em>why</em> Williams thinks companies are making such large investments into Android, and you'll find the answer to that and much more in the video past the break.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2009/10/25/symbian-ceo-trashes-googles-android-on-video/">MobileTechWorld</a>; Thanks, fido]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/23/symbian-executives-rips-into-googles-android/">Read</a> - Lee Williams interview with GigaOM<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/technology/26android.html?_r=1">Read</a> - New York Times: 'Big Cellphone Makers Shifting to Android System'<br />
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/173597/Android_Symbian_Will_Own_Smartphones_in_2012.html?tk=rss_news">Read</a> - PCWorld: 'Android, Symbian Will Own Smartphones in 2012'<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/symbian/" rel="tag">Symbian</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19209331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>Google</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobile os</category><category>mobile platform</category><category>MobileOs</category><category>MobilePlatform</category><category>Symbian</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/23/symbian-executives-rips-into-googles-android/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct2609symbianlewill.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Strap yourselves in, folks, we're about to launch the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CeOhNoHeDidnt/">Mudslinger 3000</a> again and figure out if any of it sticks. Lee Williams of Symbian starts off with a few attack volleys relating to Google's "fragmentation" of UI elements, and the resultant closed APIs being a nightmare to code for. With so many divergent UI elements and styles, he argues, developers would suffer, and the consequence would be a less vibrant app ecosystem. His major gripe with Google's mobile OS, though, has to do with the pervasive "cookie-ing" of customers, which raises the specter of privacy concerns. When asked directly by our buddy Om Malik whether he considers Android "more evil" than Apple's iPhone OS, Williams replied:<br />
<blockquote><em>"I don't view Apple as evil, they're just greedy... Google, come on! When you have to say in your motto that we're not evil, right away the first question in my mind is, 'why do you have to tell me that?'"</em><br />
</blockquote> All this must be tempered by the knowledge that Android is set to overtake <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/22/htc-adopting-android-on-50-of-its-handsets-in-2010/">large swathes</a> of the mobile OS space, and some retaliatory trash talking is probably to be expected from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/">incumbent smartphone leader</a>. Om does ask another sage question, in querying <em>why</em> Williams thinks companies are making such large investments into Android, and you'll find the answer to that and much more in the video past the break.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2009/10/25/symbian-ceo-trashes-googles-android-on-video/">MobileTechWorld</a>; Thanks, fido]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/23/symbian-executives-rips-into-googles-android/">Read</a> - Lee Williams interview with GigaOM<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/technology/26android.html?_r=1">Read</a> - New York Times: 'Big Cellphone Makers Shifting to Android System'<br />
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/173597/Android_Symbian_Will_Own_Smartphones_in_2012.html?tk=rss_news">Read</a> - PCWorld: 'Android, Symbian Will Own Smartphones in 2012'<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLV: Symbian's Lee Williams rips into Android, implies Google is evil (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19209274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlv-symbians-lee-williams-rips-into-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>Google</category><category>lee williams</category><category>LeeWilliams</category><category>mobile os</category><category>mobile platform</category><category>MobileOs</category><category>MobilePlatform</category><category>Symbian</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXIV: Microsoft's Greenberg says Xbox will outsell PS3 for 'entire generation']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2009/10/15/microsoft-s-aaron-greenberg-looks-to-holiday-2009-beyond.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/08-28-09aarongreenberg.jpg" /></a>Didn't think Microsoft exec Aaron Greenberg could top himself after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/xboxs-aaron-greenberg-hulu-on-360-like-asking-out-a-really-ho/">saying</a> that Hulu on 360 was like "asking out a really hot chick on a date?" Well, think again, 'cause Greenberg recently sat down with <em>GameInformer</em> for a fairly wide ranging interview, and he took the opportunity to toss a few bombs in Sony's direction. The biggest of those is that he's "confident" that the Xbox 360 will "not only outsell PS3 for the full calendar year, but for this entire generation" -- adding that it's "similar to a game of baseball, it is not about just winning one inning, but instead being able to win the game by consistently delivering across all nine innings." Greenberg also went on to say that Sony's expected good showing in the September sales numbers is merely a "short term bump," and that "it is not a real concern to us." Hit up the link below for the complete interview, which also includes talk of the Zune HD, Xbox Live, and Microsoft's plans for the holiday season.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/173786/xbox_360_outsell_ps3.html?tk=rss_news">PC World</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXIV: Microsoft's Greenberg says Xbox will outsell PS3 for 'entire generation'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2009/10/15/microsoft-s-aaron-greenberg-looks-to-holiday-2009-beyond.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19199175/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiv-microsofts-greenberg-says-xbox-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aaron greenberg</category><category>AaronGreenberg</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>greenberg</category><category>microsoft</category><category>xbox</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXIII: Bobby Kotick says Guitar Hero going plug-and-play, developers kept in state of 'skepticism, pessimism, and fear']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/6226758.html"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/bobby-kotick-20090915.jpg" alt="Guitar Hero franchise going the plug-and-play route, its developers start listening to My Chemical Romance" /></a><br /></div>
You know those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/shredz64-project-bringing-guitar-hero-to-the-commodore-64/">Atari controllers</a> that let you play Atari games <em>without actually having an Atari</em>? That, it seems, is the future of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/guitarhero"><em>Guitar Hero</em></a> franchise, with Activision CEO Bobby Kotick indicating that new titles from the company will be playable "independent of a console." It's perhaps a natural step, as the franchise's developers must surely spend half their time frantically porting games from PS3 to Xbox 360 to Nintendo DS to graphic calculator to... well, you get the picture. Kotick also said some wondrous things that will make those Activision coders slouch even further into their chairs, developers who already were surely fearing for their jobs, indicating that they live within a corporate environment of "skepticism, pessimism, and fear" with the hope of "keeping people focused on the deep depression," and that he wants to take "all the fun out of making video games." So, then, that My Chemical Romance edition of the series should be announced any time now. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/09/14/activision-ceo-talks-console-less-guitar-hero-turning-fear-into/">Joystiq</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXIII: Bobby Kotick says Guitar Hero going plug-and-play, developers kept in state of 'skepticism, pessimism, and fear'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gamespot.com/news/6226758.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19161738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxiii-bobby-kotick-says-guitar-hero-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision</category><category>activision guitar hero</category><category>ActivisionGuitarHero</category><category>bobby kotick</category><category>BobbyKotick</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>guitar hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXII: Steve Ballmer publicly ridicules Microsoft employee with iPhone, threatens to smash it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/steve-ballmer-ce-oh-no-he-didn-donkey-kong.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">Not every man was born with common sense. And anyone who's ever seen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/07/ballmer-answer-iphone-sdk-questions-revisits-monkey-boy-dance/">Steve Ballmer take a stage</a> knows that you don't want to get in the way of the emotionally-charged big man when the curtain opens. So we're not terribly surprised to learn that Steve grabbed an iPhone he saw during his big entrance to a private Microsoft company meeting held at Seattle's Safeco Field. Apparently, the hapless employee (allegedly from the Windows group) was trying to snap a photo of his boss when Ballmer grabbed the device and made some "funny comments" met by boos and jeers from Microsoft's employees. Steve then set it on the ground and pretended to stomp on it before walking away -- later teasing the employee during his presentation by noting that he hadn't forgotten him. Good times, we're sure, and nothing rallies the troops like a common enemy... except perhaps the camaraderie that comes in knowing that you've created a game-changing device.<br />
<br />
We even have a photograph from the <span style="font-style: italic;">actual iPhone</span> supposedly snapped while Steve Ballmer was brandishing it overhead. We can't say for sure if it's real, in fact, that could be the guy from Lost. See it after the break.</div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXII: Steve Ballmer publicly ridicules Microsoft employee with iPhone, threatens to smash it</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LXII: Steve Ballmer publicly ridicules Microsoft employee with iPhone, threatens to smash it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/09/ballmer_spots_microsoft_employee_with_iphone_at_company_meeting.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19158038/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/11/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lxii-steve-ballmer-publicly-ridicules/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>competition</category><category>iphone</category><category>microsoft</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LX: NVIDIA calls Intel's single-chip Atom pricing "pretty unfair"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCATRE54H5OK20090518"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/5-20-09jsh2.jpg" /></a>Now that Intel's been slapped with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/intel-fined-1-45-billion-dollars/">record $1.45b antitrust fine in Europe</a>, it seems like the claws are coming out -- AMD just put up that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/amd-breaks-free-creates-site-dedicated-to-intels-antitrust-r/">"Break Free" site</a>, and today we've got NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang calling Chipzilla's Atom pricing "unfair." It seems that Intel sells the standard Atom chip for $45 on its own, but bundles the diminutive CPU into the oh-so-familiar netbook configuration for just $25, meaning NVIDIA's <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/ion">Ion</a> chipset isn't price-competitive. Of course, this is just another twist in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/">endless</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/intel-rips-into-nvidias-ion-platform/">argument</a> about Ion, but despite <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/">the denials</a>, this isn't the first time we've heard whispers that Intel pretty much forces manufacturers to buy complete Atom chipsets -- the dearth of Ion-powered netbooks in the market is fairly suspicious considering the GeForce 9400M at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/12/nvidia-ion-platform-gets-demonstrated-at-ces/">heart of the platform</a> is a well-known quantity. On the other hand, we've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/nvidia-40-atom-based-ion-platforms-by-end-of-2009/">also heard</a> this is all going to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/dozens-of-ions-captured-showing-no-charge-whatsoever/">change</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/24/first-ion-based-netbooks-reportedly-on-track-for-june-debut/">change dramatically</a> at Computex next month, so we'll see -- either way, things are bound to get interesting.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/cpu-memory/news/2009/05/20/nVidia--Intel-Atom-Pricing--Pretty-Unfair-/p1">TrustedReviews</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LX: NVIDIA calls Intel's single-chip Atom pricing "pretty unfair"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 20 May 2009 15:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCATRE54H5OK20090518>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1551982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/20/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-nvidia-calls-intels-single-chip-atom-pricin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>ce oh</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no</category><category>ce-ohno</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>CeOh</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>chipset</category><category>intel</category><category>ion</category><category>jen hsun huang</category><category>jen-hsun huang</category><category>Jen-hsunHuang</category><category>JenHsunHuang</category><category>nvidia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=AAPL:US&amp;sid=aLU.GjaZD9Ao"><img vspace="14" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mcnamee-20090306-250.jpg" /></a>Roger McNamee, founding partner of the Palm-rescuing investment firm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/elevation%20partners">Elevation Partners</a>, has had some interesting things to say about what to expect from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pre">Pre</a>. Now, though, he's really out done himself with what he has to say about the iPhone. In an interview with <em>Bloomberg</em>, McNamee (aka "Chubby Wombat Moonalice" when playing bass) predicted that the Pre will bring the downfall of Apple's wunder-handset, saying:<br /><blockquote><em>June 29, 2009, is the two-year anniversary of the first shipment of the iPhone. Not one of those people will still be using an iPhone a month later. Think about it -- if you bought the first iPhone, you bought it because you wanted the coolest product on the market. Your two-year contract has just expired. Look around. Tell me what they're going to buy.</em><br /></blockquote>We don't know the future, but we can sure tell you what we're not buying <em>right now.</em> And besides, we don't know too many early adopter types that could resist the siren call of 3G halfway through their existing iPhone contract, thereby re-upping their contract for another few millenia. That should be plenty enough time for Apple to whip up something new... or at least for Roger to get a haircut. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/03/05/palm-pre-iphone">Daring Fireball</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=AAPL:US&amp;sid=aLU.GjaZD9Ao>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1480875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>elevation partners</category><category>ElevationPartners</category><category>iphone</category><category>mcnamee</category><category>mobile</category><category>palm</category><category>palm pre</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>pre</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=AAPL:US&amp;sid=aLU.GjaZD9Ao"><img vspace="14" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mcnamee-20090306-250.jpg" /></a>Roger McNamee, founding partner of the Palm-rescuing investment firm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/elevation%20partners">Elevation Partners</a>, has had some interesting things to say about what to expect from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pre">Pre</a>. Now, though, he's really out done himself with what he has to say about the iPhone. In an interview with <em>Bloomberg</em>, McNamee (aka "Chubby Wombat Moonalice" when playing bass) predicted that the Pre will bring the downfall of Apple's wunder-handset, saying:<br /><blockquote><em>June 29, 2009, is the two-year anniversary of the first shipment of the iPhone. Not one of those people will still be using an iPhone a month later. Think about it -- if you bought the first iPhone, you bought it because you wanted the coolest product on the market. Your two-year contract has just expired. Look around. Tell me what they're going to buy.</em><br /></blockquote>We don't know the future, but we can sure tell you what we're not buying <em>right now.</em> And besides, we don't know too many early adopter types that could resist the siren call of 3G halfway through their existing iPhone contract, thereby re-upping their contract for another few millenia. That should be plenty enough time for Apple to whip up something new... or at least for Roger to get a haircut. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/03/05/palm-pre-iphone">Daring Fireball</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LIX: Elevation's McNamee predicts death to iPhone on June 29</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=AAPL:US&amp;sid=aLU.GjaZD9Ao>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1480662/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/06/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lix-elevations-mcnamee-predicts-death/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>elevation partners</category><category>ElevationPartners</category><category>iphone</category><category>mcnamee</category><category>palm</category><category>palm pre</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>pre</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVIII: NVIDIA CEO doesn't know what Larrabee is, doesn't care]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.crn.com/hardware/210200876;jsessionid=GOTVPJEBYTYLGQSNDLPSKHSCJUNN2JVN?pgno=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/4-10-08-huang.jpg" alt="" /></a>NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang just can't resist throwing more jabs at Intel, distracting the inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/20/nvidia-to-announce-an-x86-compatible-chip-next-week/">NVISION</a> crowd from Battlestar Galactica star Tricia Helfer with the claim that "<span id="articleBody">Larrabee hasn't shipped so you don't know what it is and I don't know what it is." </span><span id="articleBody">The fact that we do know what it is -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/">a next-gen hybrid CPU / GPU</a> -- shouldn't be a concern according to Huang, because "By the time it does ship, Nvidia's technology will be so far advanced it won't matter." Besides stuffing Usain Bolt-type speed into a GPU the company will keep busy working on its WinMo smartphone hardware, and software for the not-exactly-Atom-killing VIA Nano, but forget about that rumored x86-compatible hardware 'cuz, as Jen-Hsun reminds us, "the Internet doesn't run on x86." </span><span id="articleBody">For a company that lacks <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/02/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-liii-amds-hector-ruiz-badmouths-intel/">innovation</a>, is "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/">a joke</a>," and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/25/nvidia-throws-another-punch-sez-larrabee-wouldve-been-hot-in-2/">at least four years behind</a>, Intel must be doing something right, because the competition can't keep its name out of their mouths.</span><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVIII: NVIDIA CEO doesn't know what Larrabee is, doesn't care</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.crn.com/hardware/210200876;jsessionid=GOTVPJEBYTYLGQSNDLPSKHSCJUNN2JVN?pgno=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1296914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bsg</category><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>graphics</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>larrabee</category><category>nvidia</category><category>nvision</category><category>via nano</category><category>ViaNano</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVII: Howard Stringer says the Wii is not 'a competitor']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/stringer-dismisses-wii-as-expensive-niche-console"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/stringer1234235667.jpg" alt="" /></a>Further confirming his utter disconnect from reality, Sony head <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/howardstringer">Howard Stringer</a> referred to Nintendo's market-dominating Wii as an "expensive niche game device." Previous to making that statement, Stringer bafflingly said, "I've played a Nintendo Wii, I don't see it as a competitor." Now look -- we're not saying you're in some kind of CEO super-denial, but all signs point to the possibility that you should <em>probably</em> consider the Wii a competitor (since it is... well... a competing system and platform), and perhaps recognize that "niche" is typically not synonymous with "best selling." Of course, you're the guy running Sony, we're just watching the crackup from the sidelines.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com/2008/07/14/stringer-wii-is-expensive-niche-console/">Nintendo Wii Fanboy</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVII: Howard Stringer says the Wii is not 'a competitor'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/stringer-dismisses-wii-as-expensive-niche-console>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1256059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/15/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvii-howard-stringer-says-the-wii-is-n/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh</category><category>ce-oh no</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no</category><category>Ce-ohNo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>howard stringer</category><category>HowardStringer</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendo wii</category><category>NintendoWii</category><category>playstation 3</category><category>Playstation3</category><category>ps3</category><category>sony</category><category>wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVI: Dell states, for the record, he could take Jobs in a fight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/jobs-vs-dell-mii-boxing.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>Michael Dell's been up on stage here at D for a solid 45 minutes and has yet to say anything particularly interesting (unless you consider rattling off numbers about unit growth, margins, etc. fascinating), but the man got his chance during the audience Q&amp;A. Someone asked if he could take Steve Jobs in a fight, and Dell flatly replied, "Yeah, I could take him." Now there's a fight we'd pay good money to see.<br /><br />[Thanks <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=3076549">Seenew</a> for Jobs' Mii]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LVI: Dell states, for the record, he could take Jobs in a fight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 28 May 2008 15:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1208424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lvi-dell-states-for-the-record-he-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ce-oh no he didnt</category><category>Ce-ohNoHeDidnt</category><category>ceohno</category><category>ceohnohedidnt</category><category>dell</category><category>michael dell</category><category>MichaelDell</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LV: NVIDIA boss says "We're going to open a can of whoop-ass" on Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-10-08-huang.jpg" />Looks like Intel's plans to enter the graphics space in a big way with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nehalem/">Nehalem</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Larrabee/">Larrabee</a> lines strike NVIDIA CEO Jen Hsun-Huang as being rather foolish -- in a conference call with analysts today, Huang said Intel's integrated graphics offerings were "a joke," and that even a tenfold increase in performance would put them behind NVIDIA's current products. Huang didn't stop there, saying that NVIDIA was "going to open a can of whoop-ass," and that while Intel's graphics chips were fine for running Office, they would never cut it for gamers and other demanding users. Huang kept going, responding to questions about all those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/nvidia-drivers-responsible-for-nearly-30-of-vista-crashes-in-20/">driver-related Vista crashes</a> by saying that NVIDIA had to support new games weekly while Intel's chips aren't ever put to the test. Actually, that's toning it down a bit -- what Huang actually said was "You already have the right machine to run Excel. You bought it four years ago... How much faster can you render the blue screen of death?" Yeah, them's fightin' words -- you going to sit there and take it, Intel?<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Mike A.]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part LV: NVIDIA boss says "We're going to open a can of whoop-ass" on Intel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/NVIDIA%20CEO%20Were%20Going%20to%20Open%20a%20Can%20of%20Whoop%20Ass/article11448.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1164347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no-he-didnt</category><category>ceo</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>graphics</category><category>graphics cards</category><category>GraphicsCards</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>Jen-Hsun Huang</category><category>Jen-hsunHuang</category><category>nvidia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLVII: NBC Universal chief says Apple "destroyed" music pricing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/29/nbc_chief_says_apple_destroyed_music_pricing.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/jeff-zucker-sm.jpg" /></a><a href="http://engadget.com/tag/nbc">NBC</a> <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/universal">Universal</a> CEO Jeff Zucker clearly did not get enough raisins in his cereal this morning, because dude was not holding anything back during that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/jeff-zucker-says-itunes-deal-only-netted-nbc-universal-15-milli/">speech</a> he gave at Syracuse's Newhouse School of Communications -- in addition to saying NBC had made only $15M in iTunes video sales despite being the number one producer of content, he flat-out said that Apple and iTunes had "destroyed the music business" in terms of pricing and that video was next unless "we take control." Of course, seeing as consumers can access Universal's entire music catalog with various subscription services for under $10 a month ($36 a year, in the case of Yahoo Music) and entire NBC shows for free on the web, but still choose to buy songs and shows straight-up on iTunes anyway, it might be fair to say that NBC Universal is still figuring out how to monetize its content effectively, but really, where's the fun in that? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/12/switched-on-fruit-versus-fowl/">Round 7</a>, fight!<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/">CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLVII: NBC Universal chief says Apple "destroyed" music pricing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/29/nbc_chief_says_apple_destroyed_music_pricing.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1024850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xlvii-nbc-universal-chief-says-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ce oh no</category><category>ce oh no he didnt</category><category>ce-oh-no</category><category>ce-oh-no-he-didnt</category><category>CeOhNo</category><category>CeOhNoHeDidnt</category><category>juff zucker</category><category>JuffZucker</category><category>nbc</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>universal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:26:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
