<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T, Deutsche Telekom withdraw FCC application for T-Mobile merger, look toward DoJ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/t-mob.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	Now that FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/">called for an administrative hearing</a> on AT&amp;T's proposed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/20/atandt-agrees-to-buy-t-mobile-from-deutsche-telekom/">buyout</a> of T-Mobile, the two parties have decided to formally withdraw their application to the Commission. The confirmation came today, with an announcement from AT&amp;T and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DeutscheTelekom/">Deutsche Telekom</a>, which owns T-Mobile USA. In a statement, the two companies reiterated their commitment to the deal, adding that they're looking to receive final approval from the DoJ: "This formal step today is being undertaken by both companies to consolidate their strength and to focus their continuing efforts on obtaining antitrust clearance for the transaction from the Department of Justice." AT&amp;T also reaffirmed that it would incur a $4 billion hit should the deal fall through, and that it expects to take out a pretax charge for that amount during the fourth quarter of this year. Of course, Genachowski's decision must still obtain approval from the full Commission, but it certainly looks like both parties are gearing up for a courtroom battle.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/">AT&amp;T, Deutsche Telekom withdraw FCC application for T-Mobile merger, look toward DoJ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/atandt-deutsche-telekom-withdraw-fcc-application-for-t-mobile-mer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>business</category><category>carrier</category><category>Deutsche Telekom</category><category>DeutscheTelekom</category><category>doj</category><category>fcc</category><category>genachowski</category><category>industry</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>merger</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>money</category><category>politics</category><category>provider</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>telecom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC finds AT&amp;T merger not in public interest, Genachowski issues order to hold trial]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/atttmob-1314801510.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	FCC chairman Julius Genachowski issued a draft order this morning that calls for a hearing to take the AT&amp;T / T-Mobile <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/20/atandt-agrees-to-buy-t-mobile-from-deutsche-telekom/">merger</a> before an Administrative Law Judge. Such a hearing, reminiscent of the one held for the attempted buyout of DirecTV by EchoStar in 2002, would be held once the Department of Justice's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/us-government-files-to-block-propsed-atandt-t-mobile-merger/">litigation</a> is complete and would certainly be another blockade for AT&amp;T to push through. According to the FCC, the Chairman's order is awaiting final approval from the Commission at a later date, and won't be made public until that time. If the order gets the green light and a hearing is held, it'll be done so like a trial -- one involving cross examination, witnesses, rules of evidence and a good 'ol fashioned two-sided duel.<br />
	<br />
	It's no secret that the FCC has raised concerns over the proposed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/merger/">merger</a>, and pushing this order forward understandably reflects that. In fact, during a conference call with media, the FCC expressed fears that the deal would violate antitrust standards and isn't in the public interest, and the Commission cited records showing it would ultimately result in a loss of jobs, contrary to AT&amp;T's claims. Naturally, this means there's one more hoop for the carrier to go through before it can hope to pick up T-Mobile, and it's a biggie; with the FCC and DoJ holding steadfastly against the acquisition, the GSM carrier's chances of success appear to be slimming significantly. Head past the break to see AT&amp;T and Sprint's reactions to the news.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC finds AT&amp;T merger not in public interest, Genachowski issues order to hold trial</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/">FCC finds AT&amp;T merger not in public interest, Genachowski issues order to hold trial</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20112695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/22/fccs-genachowski-seeks-hearing-on-atandt-merger/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>att</category><category>fcc</category><category>fcc chairman</category><category>FccChairman</category><category>genachowski</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>merger</category><category>purchase</category><category>sprint</category><category>t-mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/comcastlevel311302010.jpg" /></a></div>
News that Comcast <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/">had threatened to block internet backbone Level 3</a>, which is one of the companies delivering Watch Instantly streams, sent shockwaves through the industry yesterday. <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/netneutrality">Net neutrality</a> advocates geared up for battle, Comcast insisted it was only enforcing the same arrangements other networks abide by while Roger Ebert and the rest of us fretted over Netflix access. Today, Level 3 issued a response to Comcast, claiming it is "distracting from the fundamental issue" which is free use of all content on the internet for its customers. Meanwhile, <em>Multichannel News</em> points out industry analysts say Level 3's claims of traffic discrimination "appear unfounded" while <em>VideoNuze</em> editor Will Richmond supposes Level 3 may have "bid too aggressively for the Netflix business and is now trying to recover." Most damaging to Level 3's argument are its own words from a dispute where it sought financial compensation from Cogent for using too much of its network's bandwidth:<br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>"For example, Cogent was sending far more traffic to the Level 3 network than Level 3 was sending to Cogent's network. It is important to keep in mind that traffic received by Level 3 in a peering relationship must be moved across Level 3's network at considerable expense. Simply put, this means that, without paying, Cogent was using far more of Level 3's network, far more of the time, than the reverse. Following our review, we decided that it was unfair for us to be subsidizing Cogent's business."</em></div>
</blockquote> Beyond analyst opinions and posturing the question of whether or not Comcast has the power to set pricing for access to its network, creating the toll road Level 3 is accusing it of being, is still at issue. That will certainly come into play at the FCC, where chairman Julius Genachowski mentioned at today's meeting that the agency is looking into Level 3's claims at the same time it continues to review the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/">joining of Comcast and NBC</a>. As far as your Netflix streams? Safe for now, though the company isn't commenting, Level 3 isn't the only provider it relies on for access and how any deal it might reach with Comcast could affect the service is still unclear.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Comcast has issued its own salvo of PR, including a video meant to breakdown exactly what internet peering is and what it wants to charge Level 3 for, 10 of its own facts about what it is, and is not doing, and a copy of the letter it's sent to the FCC about the issue. You can them all out in full after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/">FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19738846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>access</category><category>bandwidth</category><category>cogent</category><category>Cogent Communications</category><category>CogentCommunications</category><category>Comcast</category><category>fcc</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>internet video</category><category>InternetVideo</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netflix</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>peering</category><category>traffic</category><category>watch instantly</category><category>WatchInstantly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC, Justice Department look to prevent Comcast from hogging NBC's online video all for itself]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/100312-nbc-01.jpg" /></a>Ready or not, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/comcast,nbc">Comcast and NBC</a> will walk down the aisle in matrimony -- but it'll not be without a few conditions. According to <em>The</em> <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, both the FCC and the Justice Department are expected to impose conditions on how NBC online video is distributed online, to ensure the cable operator (with online video distribution channels of its own) doesn't withhold or threaten to withhold NBC Universal content from rivals -- both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Netflix/">Netflix</a> and Apple are specifically cited by <em>WSJ</em>. The FCC is additionally considering restrictions on Comcast slowing down / blocking "legal traffic" from its internet network, maintaining a pro-net neutrality stance. Chairman Julius Genachowski is currently meeting with staffers twice a week on the deal, with the timetable of circulating proposed conditions by mid-December -- narrowly avoiding sweeps week, unless <em>30 Rock</em> has an idea or two up its Kabletown-owned sleeve.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/">FCC, Justice Department look to prevent Comcast from hogging NBC's online video all for itself</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19717180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>comcast</category><category>fcc</category><category>genachowski</category><category>hulu</category><category>itunes</category><category>julius genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>justice department</category><category>JusticeDepartment</category><category>merger</category><category>nbc</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netflix</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC reevaluates US broadband competitiveness, finds 14 to 24 million lack access]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/fcc-broadband-07-21-2010.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nationalbroadbandplan">National Broadband Plan</a> may one day bring broadband to everyone in the United States but, as a new report from the FCC itself reveals, there's still quite a ways to go. According to the report (issued every year by the agency), between 14 and 24 million Americans have no access to broadband, which is now defined by the FCC to be a 4Mbps downstream and 1Mbps upstream. That's a significant revision from the previous 200kbps downstream standard used by the annual report, and brings it in line with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/">minimum goals</a> set by the National Broadband Plan. What does that mean for the 14 to 24 million without broadband access? Not much at the moment, unfortunately. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski says that those individuals are mostly in "expensive-to-serve areas with low population density," and that "without substantial reforms to the agency's universal service programs, these areas will continue to be unserved." Of course, that finding is just one part of the report -- hit up the source link below to check out the whole thing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/">FCC reevaluates US broadband competitiveness, finds 14 to 24 million lack access</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19563879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/22/fcc-reevaluates-us-broadband-competitiveness-finds-14-to-24-mil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>broadband access</category><category>BroadbandAccess</category><category>fcc</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>internet</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>national broadband plan</category><category>NationalBroadbandPlan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Senators grill FCC Chairman over 'modest' National Broadband Plan goals]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/01/1-13-09-genachowski260.jpg" /></a>Bringing broadband to everybody is certainly an admirable goal, but at least some US Senators are apparently starting to question if the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nationalbroadbandplan">National Broadband Plan</a> is ambitious enough. In written questions submitted to FCC Chairman <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Genachowski">Julius Genachowsk</a>i recently, Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) pointed out that other nations already have 100Mbps fiber-based services and are beginning to roll out 1Gbps residential services, which would only be required for a "single anchor institution in each community by 2020" under the National Broadband Plan" -- something Inouye says "appears to suggest that the US should accept a 10- to 12-year lag behind the leading nations." That's a sentiment echoed by Senator Mark Begich (D-AK), who asked Genachowski why the plan settled for the minimum download speed of 4Mbps by 2020, and added that "it seems a bit modest for a goal." For his part, Genachowski insists that the 4Mbps targets are "aggressive," and he notes that the plan recommends reevaluating that target every year, so it's possible it could increase over time. Hit up the PDF link below for the complete Q&amp;A.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/">Senators grill FCC Chairman over 'modest' National Broadband Plan goals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19550723/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/senators-grill-fcc-chairman-over-modest-national-broadband-pla/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>fcc</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>high-speed internet</category><category>High-speedInternet</category><category>internet</category><category>julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>national broadband plan</category><category>NationalBroadbandPlan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC will consider 'free or very low cost wireless broadband' service]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296733A1.pdf"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="left" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/10mar10julius092bt42tf.jpg" /></a>Did you know there was a Digital Inclusion Summit going on? We <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/09/national-broadband-plan-to-bring-high-speed-access-to-all-americ/">already know</a> the FCC isn't best pleased about the fact 93 million Americans are making do without access to home broadband, and this latest event was an opportunity for it to dish some more info on its forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/fccs-genachowski-previews-broadband-plan-demands-half-gigahert/">National Broadband Plan</a>. The major obstacles to broadband adoption identified by the FCC were noted as cost, computer illiteracy, and a sheer lack of awareness about the benefits the web offers (outside of cute kitties). The big Plan will be delivered to Congress a week from today, and its suggestions will include the creation of a Digital Literacy Corps, who'll be performing missionary duties among the unenlightened, and the big whopper: a proposal to "consider use of spectrum for a free or very low cost wireless broadband service." Yeah, if you can't jump over the cost hurdle you might as well eviscerate it from existence. Quite naturally, such <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fcc%2Cspectrum">radical plans</a> have been met with much grumbling opposition, and <em>Business Week</em> reports that it may be <em>years</em> before the full reforms are implemented ... if at all.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/">FCC will consider 'free or very low cost wireless broadband' service</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19391056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/fcc-will-consider-free-or-very-low-cost-wireless-broadband-ser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>access</category><category>broadband</category><category>broadband adoption</category><category>BroadbandAdoption</category><category>digital divide</category><category>digital inclusion summit</category><category>DigitalDivide</category><category>DigitalInclusionSummit</category><category>fcc</category><category>federal communications commission</category><category>FederalCommunicationsCommission</category><category>free broadband</category><category>free internet</category><category>FreeBroadband</category><category>FreeInternet</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>internet</category><category>internet access</category><category>InternetAccess</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>low-cost</category><category>national broadband plan</category><category>NationalBroadbandPlan</category><category>newseum</category><category>web access</category><category>WebAccess</category><category>wireless</category><category>wireless broadband</category><category>wireless internet</category><category>WirelessBroadband</category><category>WirelessInternet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama taps Julius Genachowski to head the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUKTRE5227BG20090303"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/1-13-09-genachowski260.jpg" alt="" /></a>As <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/possible-new-fcc-chair-could-focus-on-net-neutrality-not-cable/">widely expected</a> by most folks who speculate on such things, President Obama has now formally nominated lawyer and former venture capitalist Julius Genachowski to head up the Federal Communications Commission and fill the slot vacated by Bush appointee <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/kevinmartin">Kevin Martin</a>. Among other things, Genachowski's nomination is particularly notable given his support for net neutrality, which he made quite well known during the Obama campaign in his role as a top technology advisor. Of course, if and when he gets confirmed, he'll also have his hands full with a few other tricky issues, including the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/18/stimulus-bill-seeks-plan-to-ensure-all-americans-have-broadband/">widespread rollout of broadband services</a> as a result of the recent stimulus package, and that small matter of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/17/t-minus-one-year-till-the-us-analog-shutoff-are-you-ready/">digital TV transition</a>. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/obama-nominates.html">Wired Epicenter</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/">Obama taps Julius Genachowski to head the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUKTRE5227BG20090303>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1478569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fcc</category><category>fcc chairman</category><category>FccChairman</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>hd</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama taps Julius Genachowski to head the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUKTRE5227BG20090303"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/01/1-13-09-genachowski260.jpg" alt="" /></a>As <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/possible-new-fcc-chair-could-focus-on-net-neutrality-not-cable/">widely expected</a> by most folks who speculate on such things, President Obama has now formally nominated lawyer and former venture capitalist Julius Genachowski to head up the Federal Communications Commission and fill the slot vacated by Bush appointee <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/kevinmartin">Kevin Martin</a>. Among other things, Genachowski's nomination is particularly notable given his support for net neutrality, which he made quite well known during the Obama campaign in his role as a top technology advisor. Of course, if and when he gets confirmed, he'll also have his hands full with a few other tricky issues, including the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/18/stimulus-bill-seeks-plan-to-ensure-all-americans-have-broadband/">widespread rollout of broadband services</a> as a result of the recent stimulus package, and that small matter of the <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/02/17/t-minus-one-year-till-the-us-analog-shutoff-are-you-ready/">digital TV transition</a>. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/obama-nominates.html">Wired Epicenter</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/">Obama taps Julius Genachowski to head the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUKTRE5227BG20090303>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1478568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/obama-taps-julius-genachowski-to-head-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fcc</category><category>fcc chairman</category><category>FccChairman</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>hdtv</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
