<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Inhabitat's Week in Green: Flaming turbines, seven eco-chic gifts and a winter wonderland of LED]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div>
	<i>Each week our friends at <a href="http://inhabitat.com/">Inhabitat</a> recap the week's most interesting green developments and clean tech news for us -- it's the Week in Green.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/lsg-atlanta-botanical-garden-installation-2.jpeg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
The past week saw several groundbreaking developments in climate news as the Chinese government <a href="http://chevyvolt.cm.fmpub.net/#http://inhabitat.com/chinese-government-tries-to-control-rain-generating-10-percent-more-precipitation-by-2015/">said that it will control rainfall</a> to generate 10 percent more precipitation by 2015. Stanford researchers developed a <a href="http://inhabitat.com/brilliant-cement-making-technology-mimics-coral-while-removing-co2-from-the-atmosphere/">new type of concrete</a> that removes CO2 from the atmosphere, and <a href="http://inhabitat.com/facebook-teams-up-with-greenpeace-to-kick-coal-power-to-the-curb/">Facebook teamed up with Greenpeace</a> to power future data centers with renewable energy. Japan also announced the <a href="http://inhabitat.com/japan-announces-official-cold-shutdown-of-damaged-reactors-at-fukushima-nuclear-plant/">cold shutdown of the damaged reactors</a> at the Fukushima nuclear plant and the <a href="http://inhabitat.com/us-solar-industry-grows-more-in-third-quarter-of-2011-than-in-all-of-2009/">US solar industry got a giant boost</a> as it grew more in the third quarter of 2011 than in all of 2009. Wind power in Scotland had a rocky week as a turbine <a href="http://inhabitat.com/wind-turbine-in-scotland-bursts-into-flames-during-hurricane-force-winds/">burst into flames</a> during hurricane force winds.<br />
<br />
In other news, it was an intense week in the world of architecture as renowned firm MVRDV <a href="http://inhabitat.com/mvrdv-apologizes-for-cloud-skyscrapers-that-resemble-exploding-twin-towers-as-outrage-spreads/">apologized for its "Cloud" skyscrapers</a>, which many people found to resemble the form of the exploding Twin Towers during the 9/11 attacks. We also brought you two high-profile architecture interviews - one with <a href="http://inhabitat.com/interview-genslers-chris-chan-on-the-sustainable-shanghai-tower-asias-tallest-skyscraper/">Gensler's Chris Chan</a> on the tallest skyscraper in Asia and one with <a href="http://inhabitat.com/interview-hoks-bill-odell-on-the-design-of-saudi-arabias-kaust-university-the-worlds-largest-leed-platinum-project/">HOK's Bill Odell</a> on the world's largest LEED platinum project. Meanwhile, BIG unveiled a <a href="http://inhabitat.com/big-architects-design-luxurious-ski-resort-you-can-ski-over/">luxury resort topped with a functional ski slope</a> and we saw a <a href="http://inhabitat.com/atlantas-botanical-garden-is-a-glowing-winter-wonderland-with-recyclable-led-topiary/">winter wonderland of LED topiaries</a> pop up in Atlanta's botanical garden.<br />
<br />
As the holiday shopping season reached its peak we also highlighted some of our favorite green gadgets - don't miss these <a href="http://inhabitat.com/10-awesome-green-gadget-gifts-for-2011/">10 great green gizmos</a> and these <a href="http://www.ecouterre.com/eco-chic-gifts-for-gadget-lovers-this-holiday-season">7 eco-chic gifts</a> for techies. We also shared an exclusive tutorial on how to <a href="http://www.ecouterre.com/make-your-own-texting-gloves-for-the-iphone-or-android-diy-tutorial/">make your own pair of texting gloves</a>, and we checked out <a href="http://www.inhabitots.com/pong%E2%84%A2-iphone-and-ipad-cases-reduce-exposure-to-cell-phone-radiation/">Pong's iPhone and iPad cases</a>, which reduce exposure to cell phone radiation. Finally, we saw scientists in Japan create the world's first <a href="http://www.ecouterre.com/japanese-scientists-create-worlds-first-renewable-bio-based-polyester/">renewable bio-based polyester</a> and we brought you <a href="http://www.ecouterre.com/n-product-turns-discarded-backpacks-inner-tubes-into-ipod-watchbands/">N-product's iPod watchbands</a>, which are made from discarded backpacks and inner tubes.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/">Inhabitat's Week in Green: Flaming turbines, seven eco-chic gifts and a winter wonderland of LED</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20130516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/18/inhabitats-week-in-green-flaming-turbines-seven-eco-chic-gift/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>green</category><category>Greenpeace</category><category>HOK</category><category>iPad</category><category>iPhone</category><category>LEED</category><category>MVRDV</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>RenewableEnergy</category><category>Stanford</category><category>this week in green</category><category>ThisWeekInGreen</category><category>week in green</category><category>weekingreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inhabitat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Acer Aspire 3811TZ and 3811TZG get Greenpeace stamp of approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/aspire-timeline-press-009greenpeace.jpg" /></div>
So Acer's new Aspire 3811TZ and Aspire 3811TZG may not be puke-green like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/sony-vaio-w-eco-edition-hands-on/#2594953">Sony's VAIO W Eco</a>, but that doesn't mean they aren't some of the greenest -- as in eco-friendly -- laptops out there. Part of the company's thin-and-light Timeline series, the two 13.3-inch laptops have been named by Greenpeace as being completely free of those bad-for-the-environment materials, including PVC (polyvinyl chloride) and BFR (brominated flame retardants). Powered by Intel ULV Core 2 Duo CPUs, they are more power-efficient than most and last longer on a charge. There doesn't seem to be an official statement from Acer on availability and price on these models, but we assume like the rest of the Timeline bunch there will be models both north and south of a grand. <br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/">Acer Aspire 3811TZ and 3811TZG get Greenpeace stamp of approval</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19321230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/18/acer-aspire-3811tz-and-3811tzg-get-greenpeace-stamp-of-approval/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3811TZ</category><category>3811TZG</category><category>acer</category><category>Acer Aspire 3811TZ</category><category>Acer Aspire 3811TZG</category><category>acer timeline</category><category>Acer Timeline 3811TZ</category><category>Acer Timeline 3811TZG</category><category>AcerAspire3811tz</category><category>AcerAspire3811tzg</category><category>AcerTimeline</category><category>AcerTimeline3811tz</category><category>AcerTimeline3811tzg</category><category>Aspire 3811TZ</category><category>Aspire 3811TZG</category><category>Aspire3811tz</category><category>Aspire3811tzg</category><category>eco-friendly</category><category>green laptops</category><category>GreenLaptops</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>ulv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace takes a break from issuing reports to vandalize HP corporate HQ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10297357-92.html"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/090729-greenpeace-02.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">As readers of this site know, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Greenpeace/">Greenpeace</a> has quite an active sideline in rating (and berating) technology companies that generate excessive toxic landfill. In fact, we've seen so many of these reports that we almost forgot what the organization does best: chasing down whaling vessels, trespassing, hanging banners, and generally bedeviling polluters in the name of Mother Earth. And now, after repeatedly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/">calling out HP</a> for using PVC and hazardous chemicals in its devices, the group has taken matters into its own hands -- specifically, by slipping into the company's Palo Alto headquarters and painting "hazardous products" on the roof, in really big letters, with non-toxic children's paint. Congratulations to the activist group for finally finding a way to spread their message to low-flying pilots in the San Francisco Bay area! One more pic after the break.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.switched.com/2009/07/29/morning-xtra-hewlett-packard-wars-with-hippies-microsoft-opens/">Switched</a>]</div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Greenpeace takes a break from issuing reports to vandalize HP corporate HQ</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/">Greenpeace takes a break from issuing reports to vandalize HP corporate HQ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10297357-92.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19113330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/29/greenpeace-takes-a-break-from-issuing-reports-to-vandalize-hp-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activism</category><category>environment</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>guide to greener electronics</category><category>GuideToGreenerElectronics</category><category>hazardous</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>pollution</category><category>pvc</category><category>vandalism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace slams HP, Lenovo, and Dell in latest report]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/ewaste-guide-11"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/greenpeace-ewaste-03-31-09.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">HP, Lenovo, and Dell haven't fared <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/">too badly</a> in some of Greenpeace's previous e-waste reports, but it looks like three companies have fallen well short of the organization's expectations this time around, with each getting called out for failing to live up to their promises. Specifically, all three had said that they would eliminate vinyl plastic (PVC) and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in their products by the end of this year, but they've now apparently told Greenpeace that they won't be able to meet that timeline, and only Lenovo has come forward set a new deadline (the end of 2010). The big winner, on the other hand, is Philips, which has jumped from 15th place to 4th as a result of some new recycling initiatives, prompted at least in part by public pressure. And, as you can see above, Nintendo is once again <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/">dead last</a>, although we're pretty sure that's simply a result of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nintendo-ships-50-million-wii-consoles-which-still-isnt-enough/">sheer</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/nintendo-doubles-up-sonys-psp-ships-100-millionth-ds-handheld/">mass</a> at this point.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/">Greenpeace slams HP, Lenovo, and Dell in latest report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/ewaste-guide-11>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1503865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/greenpeace-slams-hp-lenovo-and-dell-in-latest-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>e-waste</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>guide to greener electronics</category><category>GuideToGreenerElectronics</category><category>hp</category><category>lenovo</category><category>nintendo</category><category>philips</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell VP criticizes Apple's 'green' initiatives, pot and kettle laugh in unison]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://en.community.dell.com/blogs/direct2dell/archive/2008/12/19/the-real-meaning-of-being-green.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/pearson-flicks-apple.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Dell VP of Communities and Conversations Bob Pearson is ragging on Apple for its MacBook "Greenest Family of Notebooks" ads. In a post titled "The Real Meaning of Being Green," Pearson accuses Apple of not discussing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/environmental">environmental issues</a>, making inaccurate claims and stating no goals, while touting Dell's energy efficient Latitude E-series and use of PVC / BFR-free components. Of course, the PC maker has had its fair share of eco-unfriendly practices over the years, including accusations from the ever-fickle <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greenpeace">Greenpeace</a> last month that the company has withdrawn from its commitment to stop using PVC / BFR in its computers by the end of 2009 -- but why let little details get in the way of a good schoolyard fight?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/">Dell VP criticizes Apple's 'green' initiatives, pot and kettle laugh in unison</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://en.community.dell.com/blogs/direct2dell/archive/2008/12/19/the-real-meaning-of-being-green.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1407575/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/dell-vp-criticizes-apples-green-initiatives-pot-and-kettle-l/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>bfr</category><category>dell</category><category>eco</category><category>eco friendly</category><category>eco-friendly</category><category>EcoFriendly</category><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>environmentally friendly</category><category>EnvironmentallyFriendly</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>pvc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mac Pros accused of emitting toxic gas, placing blame on someone else]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.liberation.fr%2Fterre%2F010133618-mac-pro-le-pepin-toxique-pour-apple&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sl=fr&amp;tl=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/baby_gas_mac_big.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">Just when Apple has started to make some friends at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greenpeace">Greenpeace</a>, it looks like another one of its fine products might be a wee bit <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/">toxic</a>. According to the French newspaper Liberation, that mysterious stench emanating from your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mac+pro">Mac Pro</a> contains benzene -- which can irritate the eyes, skin and respiratory tract. Instead of being a mere inconvenience, that smell could be a cloud of poison gas that threatens to dizzy up, nauseate and migraine-ify you and everyone you care for. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple">Apple</a> has yet to issue a statement on any of this, but until it's all straightened out, those of you with the stinky Macs might want to seriously consider wearing a hazmat suit when checking your email.<br /><strong><br />Update:</strong> Apple <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/135835/2008/10/macpro_benzene.html?lsrc=rss_main">tells Macworld</a> that "We have not found anything that supports this claim, but continue to investigate it for the customer." Funny -- that's exactly what we used to say during long car rides.</div>
</div>
<br />[Via the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2008/oct/01/apple">Guardian</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/">Mac Pros accused of emitting toxic gas, placing blame on someone else</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.liberation.fr%2Fterre%2F010133618-mac-pro-le-pepin-toxique-pour-apple&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sl=fr&amp;tl=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1330232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/01/mac-pros-accused-of-emitting-toxic-gas-placing-blame-on-someone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>benzene</category><category>Greenpeace</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>toxic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ Greenpeace likes new iPod nano, congratulates self]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2008/09/less_toxic_ipods_rock.html#more"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/apple-lets-rock-051-greenpeace.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Although they still rate Apple behind Sony Ericsson, Sony, Nokia, Samsung, Dell, Toshiba, Acer... (you get the idea) in its quarterly guide to greener electronics, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greenpeace">Greenpeace</a> tossed a bit of love to the boys from Cupertino for the new eco-friendlier <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/">iPod nano</a>. In a blog post titled "less toxic iPods rock," Greenpeace praised itself as victorious in its own "Green my Apple campaign" before chiding Apple for not doing more to green all of its products. Hooray, a victory for Greenpeace, shame on you Apple for uh... oh never mind. <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/17555/18579/greenpeace-happy-new-ipod-nanos.phtml">Pocket-lint</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/"> Greenpeace likes new iPod nano, congratulates self</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2008/09/less_toxic_ipods_rock.html#more>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1311040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/greenpeace-likes-new-ipod-nano-congratulates-self/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Huh? Greenpeace calls the MacBook Air "a winner"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/green-apple-not-quite-ripe"><img width="207" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="207" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/01/green_apple_logo.jpg" alt="" /></a>Apple and Greenpeace <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/">haven't exactly</a> been the best of buds. However, MacWorld seems to have changed all that, at least for Greenpeace. In a statement issued on their US website, Greenpeace says the following:<br /><br />"The MacBook Air is a strong entry in the race to build a green PC. As a mercury and arsenic free laptop it exceeds European Standards (RoHS directive exemptions) and raises the bar for the rest of the industry."<br /><br />Sure, the Greenies still had their nits to pick with the use of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/">PVC and BFRs</a>. Nevertheless, they did give a nod of approval in noting their reduced usage. Had Greenpeace's statement not been laced with condescending phrases like, "It's a big step for Steve," the whole week might have ended with some herb being passed around the Kumbaya circle -- 'ere 'ippie, gimme a 'ug.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=20189">Macworld</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/">Huh? Greenpeace calls the MacBook Air "a winner"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/green-apple-not-quite-ripe>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1090289/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/18/huh-greenpeace-calls-the-macbook-air-a-winner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>bfr</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>macbook air</category><category>MacbookAir</category><category>pvc</category><category>rohs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace posts latest Guide to Greener Electronics: Sony Ericsson first, Nintendo in dead last]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/greenpeace-guide-6.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<a href="http://engadget.com/tag/greenpeace">Greenpeace</a> posted the latest edition of its "Guide to Greener Electronics" yesterday, which ranks the top 18 consumer electronics companies by their policies towards toxic chemicals and recycling, and it looks like the rankings have shifted slightly since <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">last time</a> -- Sony Ericsson and Samsung have tied for the lead with a 7.7 out of 10 rating (taking over from Nokia, which fell to number 9 with a 6.7) and Sony is sitting pretty at number 3 with a 7.2. Apple, which has taken some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/">lumps</a> in the past few months, is right in the middle of the pack with a 6, but most surprising is Nintendo, which came in absolutely dead last with a big ol' 0 -- looks like Mario wasted a little too much water in Sunshine, eh?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/">Greenpeace posts latest Guide to Greener Electronics: Sony Ericsson first, Nintendo in dead last</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1049103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/greepeace-posts-latest-guide-to-greener-electronics-sony-ericss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>guide to greener electronics</category><category>GuideToGreenerElectronics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple gets sued over Greenpeace iPhone report]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138454-c,iphone/article.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-greenpeace_iphone.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
So hot on the heels of that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/">Greenpeace report</a> (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/">Apple response</a>) claiming the iPhone contains toxic chemicals, California's Center for Environmental Health filed legal notice of a potential lawsuit against Apple alleging under California's Proposition 65 law that the iPhone's "phthalate" content requires the company to either put warning labels on the device, or, better yet, re-engineer it so it doesn't contain the compounds at all. The notice gives Apple 60 days to respond before CEH can file a lawsuit. We spoke to Charles Margulis, communications director at CEH, and learned a few things about the suit:<br />
<ul>
    <li>CEH hasn't actually tested an iPhone for the presence of these compounds themselves -- they're working off what they, like everyone else, read in the Greenpeace report. However, they have started testing and expect to be complete before the 60 days are up. Charles wouldn't say what they would do if their tests didn't jive with Greenpeace's results.</li>
    <li>The reason they filed suit so quickly is a function of how the law works. Even though they don't have independent verification of the iPhone's alleged toxic content, CEH will be in a weaker position to sue Apple if another organization or individual files first. According to Charles, CEH would rather have Apple revise the iPhone to be cleaner than get massive damages, and CEH doesn't want other, greedier parties to get in the way.</li>
    <li>The ultimate goal is not necessarily monetary damages -- although Charles called those "a tool we can use" -- but to get Apple to reformulate the iPhone and perhaps send a warning letter to existing customers.</li>
</ul>
So while we're still going to be skeptical until we see additional verification of that Greenpeace report, it certainly doesn't seem like CEH is simply angling for cash here. In the meantime, it might be wise to avoid <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/will-it-blend-the-iphone-smoothie/">blending</a> your baby.<br /><em><br />Disclaimer: Although this post was written by an attorney, it is not meant as legal advice or analysis and should not be taken as such.</em><br /><br /><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138454-c,iphone/article.html">Read</a> -- PC World article on the suit<br /><a href="http://www.cehca.org/">Read</a> -- CEH website<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/">Apple gets sued over Greenpeace iPhone report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1014039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-gets-sued-over-greenpeace-iphone-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>center for environmental health</category><category>CenterForEnvironmentalHealth</category><category>charles margulis</category><category>CharlesMargulis</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>iphone</category><category>legal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple responds to Greenpeace: what part of "end of 2008" didn't you understand?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/10/15/appleiphone/index.php?lsrc=mwrss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-greenpeace_iphone.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Yesterday's battle between Greenpeace and Apple had the former publicly chastising the latter for its continued use of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments">hazardous chemicals in its iPhone</a>. While they conceded that Apple is compliant with Europe's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/rohs">RoHS</a> (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) standard, they lambasted Cupertino for its continued use of PVC and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) which, according to Greenpeace, "suggests that Apple is not making early progress towards its 2008 commitment to phase-out all uses of these materials." This morning, an Apple spokesperson told <em>Macworld</em> that, "Like all Apple products worldwide, iPhone complies with RoHS, the world's toughest restrictions on toxic substances in electronics. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">As we have said</a>, Apple will voluntarily eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs by the end of 2008." Sure, you can fault Apple for not being as environmentally friendly as PVC-free Nokia, or Motorola and Sony Ericsson who offer some devices with BFR-free components. However, Greenpeace shouldn't feign surprise at what they found.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/">Apple responds to Greenpeace: what part of "end of 2008" didn't you understand?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/10/15/appleiphone/index.php?lsrc=mwrss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1014209/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>chemicals</category><category>environment</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>iphone</category><category>mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple responds to Greenpeace: what part of "end of 2008" didn't you understand?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/10/15/appleiphone/index.php?lsrc=mwrss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-greenpeace_iphone.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Yesterday's battle between Greenpeace and Apple had the former publicly chastising the latter for its continued use of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments">hazardous chemicals in its iPhone</a>. While they conceded that Apple is compliant with Europe's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/rohs">RoHS</a> (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) standard, they lambasted Cupertino for its continued use of PVC and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) which, according to Greenpeace, "suggests that Apple is not making early progress towards its 2008 commitment to phase-out all uses of these materials." This morning, an Apple spokesperson told <em>Macworld</em> that, "Like all Apple products worldwide, iPhone complies with RoHS, the world's toughest restrictions on toxic substances in electronics. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">As we have said</a>, Apple will voluntarily eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs by the end of 2008." Sure, you can fault Apple for not being as environmentally friendly as PVC-free Nokia, or Motorola and Sony Ericsson who offer some devices with BFR-free components. However, Greenpeace shouldn't feign surprise at what they found.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/">Apple responds to Greenpeace: what part of "end of 2008" didn't you understand?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/10/15/appleiphone/index.php?lsrc=mwrss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1014202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/16/apple-responds-to-greenpeace-what-part-of-end-of-2008-didnt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>chemicals</category><category>environment</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>iphone</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>rohs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace dismantles iPhone, discovers "hazardous chemicals"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/iPhone-test-hazardous-toxic-chemicals151007"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-greenpeace_iphone.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apple's no stranger to being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">slammed</a> by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/">Greenpeace</a>, and while Steve certainly spoke of a "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">Greener Apple</a>," it seems that the iPhone wasn't included. According to tests arranged by the entity, it was found that the iPhone contained "toxic brominated compounds (indicating the presence of brominated flame retardants) and hazardous PVC," <strike>which are said to be disallowed across the pond due to RoHS requirements</strike>. More specifically, the independent testing found "brominated compounds in half the samples, including in the phone's antenna, in which they made up 10-percent of the total weight of the flexible circuit board." As expected, Greenpeace wasted no time pointing to <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/">rival firms</a> that have received pats on the back for their green efforts, and subsequently shook a finger at Apple while murmuring "tsk tsk" -- but we'll leave the actual politicking to you all in comments, cool?<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: Our bad, Greenpeace does not claim that Apple is in violation of RoHS requirements.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.switched.com/2007/10/15/iphone-bad-for-environment-says-greenpeace/?ncid=NWS00010000000001">Switched</a>, thanks Laura]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/">Greenpeace dismantles iPhone, discovers "hazardous chemicals"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/iPhone-test-hazardous-toxic-chemicals151007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1013594/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>environment</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>iphone</category><category>toxic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace dismantles iPhone, discovers "hazardous chemicals"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/iPhone-test-hazardous-toxic-chemicals151007"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-greenpeace_iphone.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apple's no stranger to being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">slammed</a> by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/">Greenpeace</a>, and while Steve certainly spoke of a "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">Greener Apple</a>," it seems that the iPhone wasn't included. According to tests arranged by the entity, it was found that the iPhone contained "toxic brominated compounds (indicating the presence of brominated flame retardants) and hazardous PVC," <strike>which are said to be disallowed across the pond due to RoHS requirements</strike>. More specifically, the independent testing found "brominated compounds in half the samples, including in the phone's antenna, in which they made up 10-percent of the total weight of the flexible circuit board." As expected, Greenpeace wasted no time pointing to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/">rival firms</a> that have received pats on the back for their green efforts, and subsequently shook a finger at Apple while murmuring "tsk tsk" -- but we'll leave the actual politicking to you all in comments, cool?<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: Greenpeace does not claim that Apple is in violation of RoHS.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.switched.com/2007/10/15/iphone-bad-for-environment-says-greenpeace/?ncid=NWS00010000000001">Switched</a>, thanks Laura]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/">Greenpeace dismantles iPhone, discovers "hazardous chemicals"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/iPhone-test-hazardous-toxic-chemicals151007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1013593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/greenpeace-dismantles-iphone-discovers-hazardous-chemicals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>environment</category><category>green</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>iphone</category><category>mobile</category><category>studies</category><category>toxic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace rates Apple, Lenovo higher: Sony drops to least green position]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133548-c,recycling/article.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/greener-electronic.jpg" alt="" /></a>Well well well, it turns out that Apple's new approach of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">partial openness</a> is starting to pay off for the company as a whole, with Greenpeace increasing Apple's marks for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/02/steve-jobs-talks-a-greener-apple-led-backlit-macs-this-year/">promising to be more green in the future</a>. In Greenpeace's most recent ranking of the technology industry, it put Nokia on top (thanks to its cutting the use of PVC), Dell and Lenovo in second, and Apple at 10th place -- a jump for the latter three companies, who came near <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">bottom last time</a>. At the bottom this time around is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sony/">Sony</a>, which dropped due to dodgy waste disposal policies: hence, we shall now commence waiting for a pseudo-blog post <a href="http://features.engadget.com/2006/01/05/live-coverage-of-sonys-sir-howard-stringer/">from Sir. Stringer</a> announcing a "greener Sony." Gotta get on that bandwagon!<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/">Greenpeace rates Apple, Lenovo higher: Sony drops to least green position</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133548-c,recycling/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/930608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/01/greenpeace-rates-apple-lenovo-higher-sony-drops-to-least-green/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Environment</category><category>Green</category><category>Greenpeace</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Naked Steve Jobs accosted by Greenpeace]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.melablog.it/galleria/greenpeace-allapple-store/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/03/naked-steve-jobs.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We shudder to think how many Apple fanboys that have secretly fantasized about this day. Well, sorry to disappoint, but Steve Jobs wears leafy garments underneath it all. He's also not so sure about this whole "I like Apple, but without toxic substances" thing being postulated by the don't-you-have-bigger-fish-to-fry folks at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Greenpeace">Greenpeace</a>. What's he pondering? "How can I cram more toxic substances into something as small as the shuffle?" Or perhaps "Where <em>did</em> I put those pants?" We just might never know.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wearables/" rel="tag">Wearables</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/">Naked Steve Jobs accosted by Greenpeace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.melablog.it/galleria/greenpeace-allapple-store/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/864697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/01/naked-steve-jobs-accosted-by-greenpeace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>greenpeace</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell starts up their free recycling program]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/dell_recycling?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;keycode=6Vp94&amp;DGVCode=JP"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/04/junkedcomputers.jpg" alt="" /></a> </div>
Announced back in June, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/dell-expands-recycling-program-no-purchase-required/">Dell's new free recycling program</a> is now live, meaning you can recycle any Dell product at no cost to you, without any of those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/31/apple-gets-going-on-recycling-program/">pesky requirements</a> to buy a new Dell machine in the process. All you've gotta do is head on over to their site, print out your free shipping voucher, pack and ship your obsolete Dell product and then throw a little environmentally-friendly party for your environmentally-friendly bad self. We can't say even a program like this could get Apple off the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">Greenpeace naughty list</a>, but it seems worth a shot -- Dell's just making y'all look bad.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/30/0111222&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/">Dell starts up their free recycling program</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/dell_recycling?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;keycode=6Vp94&amp;DGVCode=JP>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/677640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/dell-starts-up-their-free-recycling-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>dell</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>recycle</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenpeace slams Apple, Motorola and Lenovo for toxic chemicals]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<center><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/08/greenpeace.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></center>Late last week, Greenpeace issued its latest "Guide to Greener Electronics," which offers a serious takedown of various tech companies' environmental production practices. The organization judged several tech firms mainly on the criteria of "eliminating hazardous substances" from the production phase, and also offering to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/24/california-residents-must-recycle-dead-gadgets/">take back and recycle older products</a>. <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/dell">Dell</a> and <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/">Nokia</a> topped the list, but <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/apple">Apple</a>, <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/motorola">Motorola</a> and <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/lenovo">Lenovo</a> were among the worst, who scored 2.7, 1.7 and 1.3 respectively on Greenpeace's 10-point scale. Lenovo, which placed last among the companies evaluated, was knocked mostly because it hasn't committed to phasing out toxic chemmicals like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and brominated flame retardant (BFR) from its product line. Motorola was particularly dinged for its recent broken promise of eliminating PVCs and BFRs from its product line, and not having good enough recycling programs. Apple was guilty of many of the same offenses as Lenovo, according to Greenpeace, but have not committed to a firm timetable for PVC and BFR elimination. According to CNET, both Lenovo and Apple disagree with Greenpeace's assesment, saying that they have strong environmental records and follow worldwide regulations. Perhaps Michael Dell and Jorma Ollila need to have a chat with Steve Jobs, Ed Zander and William Amelio to clear the air, so to speak.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://news.com.com/Greenpeace,%20Apple%20clash%20over%20toxic%20waste/2100-1014_3-6110513.html">CNET</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/">Greenpeace slams Apple, Motorola and Lenovo for toxic chemicals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/661520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/30/greenpeace-slams-apple-motorola-and-lenovo-for-toxic-chemicals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>bfr</category><category>dell</category><category>environment</category><category>ewaste</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>lenovo</category><category>motorola</category><category>nokia</category><category>pvc</category><category>toxic chemicals</category><category>ToxicChemicals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyrus Farivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia gets nod for being green]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/08/greenpeace-nokia.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>Greenpeace's "Green Electronics Guide," which ranks global electronics companies quarterly on environmental friendliness, has Nokia coming out on top among ranked phone manufacturers and ties Dell for best manufacturer overall. The guide apparently takes into account a variety of factors, including corporate policy, quantity of environmentally destructive chemicals used in production, and recycling programs. Sony Ericsson, Samsung, and LG are all bunched up in the middle of the pack, with Motorola finishing a distant last, besting only Lenovo. According to Greenpeace, all of the manufacturers have room for improvement -- Nokia included -- but hopefully this serves as a stark reminder to Moto that they need to, uh, start taking back our worn-out RAZRs and replacing them with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/24/moto-surprises-with-3g-motorazr-maxx/">MOTORAZR MAXXes</a>. Yeah, that's it.<br /><br />[Thanks, <a href="http://thinkabdul.com">Abdul</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/studies/" rel="tag">Studies</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/">Nokia gets nod for being green</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/659655/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/26/nokia-gets-nod-for-being-green/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>greenpeace</category><category>mobile</category><category>nokia</category><category>studies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:07:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
