<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[VIA QuadCore processor combines low-cost and low-power with 'adaptive overclocking']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/nano-x2-quadcore-quarter.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<div>
	Computex is coming up fast and with it we're expecting a slew of new gear. The event will also mark the first public showing of VIA's new x86 quad-core processors aptly named, QuadCore (pictured above center next to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/">Nano X2</a>). The new procs are manufactured using 40nm processes and combine four <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isaiah,via">Isaiah cores</a> on two dies resulting in a Thermal Design Power of 27.5 watts. That low TDP allows VIA to make the nebulous claim that its first QuadCore L4700 processor is 21 percent more energy efficient than its nearest competitor while offering "awesome" multitasking and multimedia playback performance. Initially available at 1.2+GHz, the 64-bit native processor features adaptive overclocking (think Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turbo%20boost">Turbo Boost</a>) for dynamic clock adjustments up to 1.46GHz, a 4MB L2 cache, and 1333MHz front-side bus. Oh, and the QuadCores will be pin-to-pin compatible with VIA Eden, C7, Nano E-Series, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/">Eden X2</a> processors when they begin shipping in bulk in Q3. We'll bring you more on these supposed low-cost procs when we see them demoed first hand in Taipei starting May 31st. Until then, click through for the full press release or hit up the more coverage links below for an in-depth preview.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIA QuadCore processor combines low-cost and low-power with 'adaptive overclocking'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/">VIA QuadCore processor combines low-cost and low-power with 'adaptive overclocking'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 May 2011 03:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19938405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/via-quadcore-processor-combines-low-cost-and-low-power-with-ada/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.2+ghz</category><category>1.2GHz</category><category>1.46ghz</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2011</category><category>Computex2011</category><category>isaiah</category><category>L4700</category><category>quadcore</category><category>tdp</category><category>via</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 03:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIA Nano X2 low power, dual-core chip gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/5306143676362963f056.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
VIA has officially announced its Nano X2 low power dual-core chip. The chip comprises two of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VIA/">VIA</a>'s 64-bit <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Isaiah">Isaiah</a> architecture cores, found in previous single-core Nano CPUs. The processors come with native 64-bit software support, VIA's PadLock hardware security features, and VT CPU virtualization technology. The new Nano X2 chips are compatible with VIA's previous processors, including the Nano, C7, C7-M, and Eden, facilitating easy upgrades. The VIA Nano X2 processors are already currently available for OEMs, with systems featuring the chips expected in the first quarter of this year. Full press release is after the break<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIA Nano X2 low power, dual-core chip gets official</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/">VIA Nano X2 low power, dual-core chip gets official</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19786743/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ces</category><category>ces 2011</category><category>ces2011</category><category>chip</category><category>chips</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>isaiah</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>nano</category><category>nano x2</category><category>NanoX2</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIA Nano 3000 CPU series finally launches to rival Intel's Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=4247"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/via-nano-3000-cpu_small.jpg" /></a></div>
We suppose dreams really do come true. Nearly a full year after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/">we heard</a> that VIA was toiling on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/27/dual-core-via-nano-processor-apparently-on-track-for-june-2010/">a new processor line</a> to really give Intel's aging <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Atom/">Atom</a> a run for its money, the company has come clean and confessed that those whispers were indeed true. The Isaiah-based Nano 3000 Series is a range of six new CPUs clocked between 1GHz and 2GHz, all of which boast an 800MHz FSB, 64-bit support, SSE4 instructions, Windows 7 / Linux compatibility and power ratings that check in some 20 percent more efficient than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/via+nano/">existing</a> VIA Nano processors. There's also the promise of 1080p multimedia playback, and VIA swears that we'll see these popping up in all-in-one desktops as well as thin-and-light laptops in the very near future. How soon, you ask? Samples are shipping now to OEMs, with mass production slated for Q1 2010.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/">VIA Nano 3000 CPU series finally launches to rival Intel's Atom</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#2415634"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/via-nano-3000-cpu_1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#2415635"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/via-nano-3000-cpu_2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#2415633"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/via-nano-3000-cpu_4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#2415636"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/via-nano-3000-cpu_3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/">VIA Nano 3000 CPU series finally launches to rival Intel's Atom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19220420/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/via-nano-3000-cpu-series-finally-launches-to-rival-intels-atom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3000 series</category><category>3000Series</category><category>all in one</category><category>all in one pc</category><category>all-in-one</category><category>all-in-one pc</category><category>All-in-onePc</category><category>AllInOne</category><category>AllInOnePc</category><category>cpu</category><category>isaiah</category><category>L3050</category><category>L3100</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>nano</category><category>processor</category><category>thin and light</category><category>thin-and-light</category><category>ThinAndLight</category><category>U3100</category><category>U3200</category><category>U3300</category><category>U3500</category><category>ultraportable</category><category>via</category><category>via nano</category><category>ViaNano</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung's Nano-powered Q1EX UMPC loses its QWERTY, gains 4.5-hour battery at the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/samsung-q1ex-press-mar5.png" /></a><br /></div>
Meet the latest iteration of the Samsung Q1 handheld: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/12/samsung-q1ex-tablet-shows-itself-gets-detailed/">NP-Q1EX</a>. First spotted at CES in January, Sammy's going back to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/09/live-at-cebit-intel-press-briefing-origami-is-dead-long-liv/">its UMPC roots</a> by ditching the split QWERTY in favor of a clean, slate look that keeps the eye focused on the 7-inch, touchscreen display with 1,024 x 600 pixel resolution. Inside you'll find XP Tablet Edition running on a 1.2GHz VIA <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/via,nano">Nano</a> ULV U2500 processor, VIA's Chrome9 HC graphics, 2GB of 667MHz DDR2 memory, 802.11b/g WiFi, Bluetooth 2.0, a SiRF Star GPS receiver, SD card slot, and a rear-mounted camera of unspecified pixel density. The unit that passed through the FCC for US airwaves approval also features a 60GB hard disk and 4-cell, 4,000mAh lithium ion battery for up to 4.5-hours of battery life according to Samsung. A quick search through the Intertubes also reveals a retail price of about $775 at on-line retailers. No launch date yet, but it can't be long now can it? A couple more pics after the break.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.navigadget.com/index.php/2009/03/04/samsung-np-q1ex">Navigadget</a>] <br /><br /><a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/detail/detail.do?group=computersperipherals&amp;type=mobilecomputing&amp;subtype=ultramobilepc&amp;model_cd=NP-Q1EX-FA01US">Read</a> -- Samsung official specs <br /><a href="http://www.beachaudio.com/Samsung/Q1ex-Fa01us-p-258985.html?sort=2a">Read</a> -- $775 listing<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Samsung's Nano-powered Q1EX UMPC loses its QWERTY, gains 4.5-hour battery at the FCC</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/">Samsung's Nano-powered Q1EX UMPC loses its QWERTY, gains 4.5-hour battery at the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1479317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/05/samsungs-nano-powered-q1ex-umpc-loses-its-qwerty-at-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrome9</category><category>isaiah</category><category>nano</category><category>np-q1ex</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>Q1EX</category><category>samsung</category><category>u2500</category><category>umpc</category><category>via</category><category>via nano</category><category>ViaNano</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIA Nano and Intel's Atom benchmarked head-to-head]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/VIA_Nano_L2100_vs_Intel_Atom_230_Head_to_Head/?page=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/7-29-08-hot-pcmark.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Netbooks based on VIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nano">Nano</a> mobile processor aren't nearly as common as those based on Intel's <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/atom">Atom</a>, but based on the benchmarking that's been going on recently, that's a shame, since the Nano appears to be much faster than the Atom 230. PC Perspective, Eee PC News, and Hot Hardware all ran some tests recently, and a 1.8GHz Nano L2100 with Chrome9 graphics was usually able to outperform a 1.6GHz Atom 230 with GMA950 graphics at everything from MP3 ripping to 3D benchmarking. Of course, that's not without a tradeoff -- the Nano was a bit more power-hungry, and the Atom's memory and graphics systems were occasionally faster than the Nano's. Still, it seems like the Nano has more raw horsepower than the Atom -- and it's pin-compatible with VIA's popular C7M, so hopefully we'll be seeing machines like HP's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/08/hp-mini-note-2133-officially-official/">Mini-Note</a> make the jump relatively soon.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=597">Read</a> - PC Perspective results<br /> <a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/VIA_Nano_L2100_vs_Intel_Atom_230_Head_to_Head/?page=1">Read</a> - Hot Hardware results<br /> <a href="http://www.eeepcnews.de/2008/07/29/via-nano-cpu-benchmarks-features-und-modelle/">Read</a> - Eee PC News results<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/">VIA Nano and Intel's Atom benchmarked head-to-head</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1269856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/29/via-nano-and-intels-atom-benchmarked-head-to-head/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>230</category><category>atom</category><category>atom 230</category><category>Atom230</category><category>bechmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>intel</category><category>isaiah</category><category>l2100</category><category>nano</category><category>nano l1200</category><category>NanoL1200</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIA Isaiah becomes Nano in quest to topple Atom and Puma]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=565"><img width="365" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="289" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/via-nano-processor.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Today is a day that <em>PC Perspective</em> is calling "one of the most pivotal days in the history of VIA Technologies." That isn't just hyperbole either, son. Via's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isaiah">Isaiah</a> processor is now official and re-dubbed Nano. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/">Atom-spanking</a> (at least preliminarily), 65-nm processors come in U (ultra-portable) and L (desktop and laptop) classes with a maximum power rating pegged between 5W to 25W. The 1GHz U2300, 1.3+GHz U2400, and 1.2GHz U2500 pull just 5W, 8W, and 6.8W, respectively with an itty bitty 100mW idle draw. Products are expected to hit shelves (and your palm) sometime in Q3. We'll bring you the detailed Nano vs. Atom vs. Puma benchmarks just as soon as we get 'em.<br /><br />[Thanks, Ryan]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/">VIA Isaiah becomes Nano in quest to topple Atom and Puma</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 May 2008 04:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=565>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1208944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/29/via-isaiah-becomes-nano-in-quest-to-topple-atom-and-puma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>isaiah</category><category>nano</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Preliminary benchmarks have VIA's Isaiah besting Intel's Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eeepcnews.de%2F2008%2F04%2F18%2Fintel-atom-benchmarks-via-isaiah-vergleich%2F&amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/atom-vs-isaiah.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
<span style="float: right; margin-left: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;"><script>digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/Prelim_benchmarks_have_VIA_s_Isaiah_besting_Intel_s_Atom';</script><script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span> You knew this day would come: Intel positioned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Atom/">Atom</a> perfectly to compete with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VIA/">VIA</a>'s low-power offerings, and VIA is trying to stay one step ahead in the low power game with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Isaiah/">Isaiah</a> processor. Who will be the winner? Well, we'd say it's still a little early to call it, but German site Eee PC News did some quick and dirty benchmarks that show Isaiah on top by a decent margin. At this point the numbers are just in "ALU" and "FPU," but hopefully some real world benchmarks from some retail products can clear this up before long.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/">Preliminary benchmarks have VIA's Isaiah besting Intel's Atom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eeepcnews.de%2F2008%2F04%2F18%2Fintel-atom-benchmarks-via-isaiah-vergleich%2F&amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1171669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/18/preliminary-benchmarks-have-vias-isaiah-besting-intels-atom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>benchmark</category><category>intel</category><category>isaiah</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA continues to hate on Intel, promises sub-$45 integrated chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/NVIDIA%20Promises%20Powerful%20Sub45%20Processing%20Platform%20to%20Counter%20Intel/article11452.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/7863_large_nvidia.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Following up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/10/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lv-nvidia-ceo-says-were-going-to-ope/">yesterday's trash talk</a> with a little action, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NVIDIA/">NVIDIA</a> has disclosed plans to create a sub-$45 processing platform which the GPU-maker is calling, "The World's Most Affordable Vista Premium PC." The architecture will combine VIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Isaiah/">Isaiah</a> processor with an integrated NVIDIA graphics chipset, which the company claims outperforms Intel's Celeron-based, 945 IGP/ICH4 setup handily. Apparently, the combo is capable of 36 GFLOPS versus Intel's 6.4GFLOPS -- which we shouldn't have to tell you is a <em>ton</em> of GFLOPS. We're excited about the prospect of better performance in an integrated chipset (we've all suffered at the hands of the GMA950), but we don't want to see this end in a back-alley knife fight. Keep your cool, guys.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/">NVIDIA continues to hate on Intel, promises sub-$45 integrated chipset</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/NVIDIA%20Promises%20Powerful%20Sub45%20Processing%20Platform%20to%20Counter%20Intel/article11452.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1164805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/11/nvidia-continues-to-hate-on-intel-promises-sub-45-integrated-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chipset</category><category>gma</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>isaiah</category><category>nvidia</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Everex Cloudbook MAX plays on Sprint's XOHM WiMAX network]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-1-08-cloudbook_max.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
Not too long ago, we gave you loyal Cloudbook owners a chance to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/07/how-would-you-change-everexs-cloudbook/">voice your opinion</a> on how you'd change things. Fast forward a few weeks, and take a gander at what Everex has put together. Debuting today at CTIA 2008, the Cloudbook MAX not only boasts an 8.9-inch WVGA (1,024 x 600) display, Windows Vista, 802.11b/g WiFi, Bluetooth, integrated GPS receiver, 2-megapixel webcam and a battery good for four hours, but it also features an 80GB HDD, 2GB of DDR2 RAM, audio in / out and an S-Video output. Beyond all that, this thing gets energized by a 1.6GHz VIA C7-M ULV processor coupled with the VX800 digital media IGP chipset, which touts full DirectX 9 support and video acceleration for MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WMV9, VC1 and DivX video formats (plus a VMR-capable HD video processor, among other things). Lastly, the unit includes built-in support for Sprint's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/XOHM/">XOHM</a> WiMAX network. Brimming with excitement yet? Start stocking that piggy bank -- this currently unpriced rig will be available in the latter half of this year across North America.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?ContentId=7700">Read</a> - VIA and Everex demonstrate Cloudbook MAX at CTIA<br /><a href="http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=2047">Read</a> - VIA VX800 Series Chipset<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: Looks like availability is now set for <a href="http://www.everex.com/products/cloudbook_max/cloudbook_max.htm">Q1 - Q2 2009</a>. Thanks, Taylor!<br /><br />
<div align="center"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/">Everex Cloudbook MAX plays on Sprint's XOHM WiMAX network</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#729529"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/everex_cloudbook_max_picture01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#729528"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/everex_cloudbook_max_picture04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#729527"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/everex_cloudbook_max_picture03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#729526"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/everex_cloudbook_max_picture09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#729525"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/everex_cloudbook_max_picture08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div> </div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/">Everex Cloudbook MAX plays on Sprint's XOHM WiMAX network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1155021/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/01/everex-cloudbook-max-plays-on-sprints-xohm-wimax-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>cloudbook</category><category>cloudbook max</category><category>CloudbookMax</category><category>ctia</category><category>ctia 2008</category><category>Ctia2008</category><category>everex</category><category>isaiah</category><category>sprint</category><category>via</category><category>vx800</category><category>vx800u</category><category>wimax</category><category>XOHM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Via's upcoming Isaiah chip can run Crysis]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTQ1MCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA=="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/01/via-isaiah-crysis.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Sure, you might've napped through the marketing speak and blearily paged through the tech documentation, but apparently you haven't heard all there is to know about the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/">Isaiah</a> architecture from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Via/">Via</a>. The folks at [H] Enthusiast got to see the chip in action, and were most impressed by the 1.8GHz bugger's ability to run Crysis. Apparently the folks at Via are fairly certain their chip can best the upcoming UMPC-friendly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Silverthorn/">Silverthorn</a> chips from Intel, and it seems like Crysis is about as good a benchmark as any. We're sure to hear more about this little rivalry in the coming months, but we like the way things are headed.<br /> <br /> [Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/01/vias-new-low-po.html">Wired</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/">Via's upcoming Isaiah chip can run Crysis</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTQ1MCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1098149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/vias-upcoming-isaiah-chip-can-run-crysis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crysis</category><category>isaiah</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Via launches Isaiah: 64-bit low-power, high-performance processors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/01/isaiah-quote.jpg" /><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Via/">Via</a>'s on the CPU warpath today, announcing a new line of 64-bit 65nm processors, dubbed Isaiah. The little Bible-themed chip-maker that withstood the AMD-Intel duopoly where others, like Transmeta, folded, is claiming that their new architecture, developed in conjunction with subsidiary Centaur, is four times as efficient as current generation Via CPUs, while remaining pin-compatible with C7 chips, as well as retaining the same thermal envelope (read: they don't make any more heat). Available in clock speeds up to 2GHz (to start) with FSBs at 800 and 1,333MHz, dual 64KB L1 caches, 1MB L2 cache, and Adaptive PowerSaver energy reduction technology, expect these chips to start showing up in the first half of this year. Those interested in geeking out further on Via's new gig can hit some of the technical details after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Via launches Isaiah: 64-bit low-power, high-performance processors</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/">Via launches Isaiah: 64-bit low-power, high-performance processors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1095244/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/via-launches-isaiah-64-bit-low-power-high-performance-processo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpu</category><category>isaiah</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
