<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Gathering 2012 to bring world's fastest internet to Norway, leave Swedish laundry out to dry]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fiber-3867kjd-kk.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Dreamhack's record breaking <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/cisco-telia-to-create-worlds-fastest-internet-connection-at-12/">120Gbps connection</a> was fast enough to replace a certain <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/swede-used-40gbps-internet-connection-to-dry-laundry/">household appliance</a>, but next to what's Norway's cooking up it looks almost <em>antiquated</em>. The Gathering, Norway's annual week-long LAN party, plans to set a new world record for the "fastest internet access in the universe" with a 200Gbps connection. "No way we would let the Swedes keep the lead on this," says Gathering head of information Simon Eriksen Valvik, "we didn't just raise the bar a little, we moved it a story up." The connection is reportedly faster than the combined bandwidth of Thailand, and will be capable of downloading 5,120 songs a second. Don't bee too envious though, the ludicrously quick network is only temporary. Representatives from Altibox, the Norwegian network that's partnering with The Gathering to break the record, say that Norway simply doesn't have the capacity to support these kinds of speeds on a day to day basis. The gap is being filled with foreign internet capacity, piped in by Level 3. Tickets for the event are already sold out, so speed freaks desperate for the fastest internet in the universe will just have to settle for the fastest internet in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/comcast-extreme-105-serves-up-105mbps-internet-speeds-for-home-u/">neighborhood</a>. At least until <em>next year.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/">The Gathering 2012 to bring world's fastest internet to Norway, leave Swedish laundry out to dry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 02:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20184253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/the-gathering-2012-to-bring-worlds-fastest-internet-to-norway/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altibox</category><category>bandwidth</category><category>capacity</category><category>cisco</category><category>DreamHack</category><category>fastestinternet</category><category>fastinternet</category><category>huawei</category><category>internet</category><category>internetconnection</category><category>lan party</category><category>LanParty</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>norway</category><category>norwegian</category><category>Sci/Tech</category><category>Thailand</category><category>the gathering</category><category>TheGathering</category><category>world record</category><category>WorldRecord</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 02:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix passes 20 million subscribers; focuses on ISP disputes, HBO, Facebook in Q4 results]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/netflixbuttonremote.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Netflix just released its financial results for the fourth quarter of 2010 and of no surprise to anyone who was paying attention last year it did quite well by passing 20 million subscribers, more than double its base at the <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2009/01/26/netflix-profit-up-45-in-q4-nears-10-million-total-subscribers/">start of 2009</a>. However, per Biggie's Law mo money = mo problems, and it took the opportunity to respond, surprisingly sharply, to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/netflix-removing-add-to-dvd-queue-button-from-tv-streamers-ex/">potential threats from its Hollywood content providers</a> and the ISPs its Watch Instantly service streams over. News of note going into 2011? A huge focus on personalization including new integration with Facebook and a mention that Apple TV has already surpassed the iPad in viewing hours. It also showed off the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/netflix-one-click-remotes-coming-to-nearly-every-device-it-str/">one-click Netflix button</a> on an unspecified (looks like Toshiba to us) remote and compared the "consternation" over its success to the rise of Fox as a broadcast network two decades ago. We'll hop on the earnings call in a few minutes for more details, check after the break for more of the details.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix passes 20 million subscribers; focuses on ISP disputes, HBO, Facebook in Q4 results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/">Netflix passes 20 million subscribers; focuses on ISP disputes, HBO, Facebook in Q4 results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19816914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/netflix-passes-20-million-subscribers-turns-an-eye-towards-isp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comcast</category><category>earnings</category><category>financials</category><category>hbo</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>netflix</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>q4</category><category>q4 2010</category><category>Q42010</category><category>starz</category><category>streaming</category><category>watch instantly</category><category>WatchInstantly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google buys gigantic former NYC Port Authority building, takes a chunk out of Chelsea]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/google-nyc-2010-12-23-600.jpg" alt="Google buys gigantic former New York City Port Authority building, takes a chunk out of Chelsea" /></a></div>
Growing companies need growing workspaces, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/google">Google</a> just bought one of the biggest possible in NYC. It's the former Port Authority Building at 111 Eighth Avenue, a massive brick establishment that, according to <em>Wired Epicenter</em>, set the company back an equally massive $1.9 billion. There's a helipad on top, perfect for quick getaways in the company's ROFLcopter, but more importantly a major fiber line runs through the building, giving the Googs priority access to bits flowing through the city. Google already has a presence within those crimson walls, which also houses offices of communications companies like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/verizon">Verizon</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/level3">Level 3</a>, companies who might just need to be finding new spaces when their current leases expire, because Google is "hiring across the board," apparently hoping to fill that thing to the brim.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/">Google buys gigantic former NYC Port Authority building, takes a chunk out of Chelsea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19774999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/23/google-buys-gigantic-former-nyc-port-authority-building-takes-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chelsea</category><category>google</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>nyc</category><category>port authority</category><category>PortAuthority</category><category>property</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/comcastlevel311302010.jpg" /></a></div>
News that Comcast <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/">had threatened to block internet backbone Level 3</a>, which is one of the companies delivering Watch Instantly streams, sent shockwaves through the industry yesterday. <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/netneutrality">Net neutrality</a> advocates geared up for battle, Comcast insisted it was only enforcing the same arrangements other networks abide by while Roger Ebert and the rest of us fretted over Netflix access. Today, Level 3 issued a response to Comcast, claiming it is "distracting from the fundamental issue" which is free use of all content on the internet for its customers. Meanwhile, <em>Multichannel News</em> points out industry analysts say Level 3's claims of traffic discrimination "appear unfounded" while <em>VideoNuze</em> editor Will Richmond supposes Level 3 may have "bid too aggressively for the Netflix business and is now trying to recover." Most damaging to Level 3's argument are its own words from a dispute where it sought financial compensation from Cogent for using too much of its network's bandwidth:<br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>"For example, Cogent was sending far more traffic to the Level 3 network than Level 3 was sending to Cogent's network. It is important to keep in mind that traffic received by Level 3 in a peering relationship must be moved across Level 3's network at considerable expense. Simply put, this means that, without paying, Cogent was using far more of Level 3's network, far more of the time, than the reverse. Following our review, we decided that it was unfair for us to be subsidizing Cogent's business."</em></div>
</blockquote> Beyond analyst opinions and posturing the question of whether or not Comcast has the power to set pricing for access to its network, creating the toll road Level 3 is accusing it of being, is still at issue. That will certainly come into play at the FCC, where chairman Julius Genachowski mentioned at today's meeting that the agency is looking into Level 3's claims at the same time it continues to review the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/">joining of Comcast and NBC</a>. As far as your Netflix streams? Safe for now, though the company isn't commenting, Level 3 isn't the only provider it relies on for access and how any deal it might reach with Comcast could affect the service is still unclear.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Comcast has issued its own salvo of PR, including a video meant to breakdown exactly what internet peering is and what it wants to charge Level 3 for, 10 of its own facts about what it is, and is not doing, and a copy of the letter it's sent to the FCC about the issue. You can them all out in full after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/">FCC looking into Comcast / Netflix blocking threat, Level 3 responds as analysts chime in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19738846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/fcc-looking-into-comcast-netflix-blocking-threat-level-3-resp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>access</category><category>bandwidth</category><category>cogent</category><category>Cogent Communications</category><category>CogentCommunications</category><category>Comcast</category><category>fcc</category><category>Genachowski</category><category>internet video</category><category>InternetVideo</category><category>Julius Genachowski</category><category>JuliusGenachowski</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netflix</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>peering</category><category>traffic</category><category>watch instantly</category><category>WatchInstantly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast, Level 3 Communications square off over video streaming, network neutrality principles]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/7-12-07-fastinternet.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
According to networking company Level 3 Communications, Comcast just couldn't <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/fcc-justice-department-look-to-prevent-comcast-from-hogging-nbc/">wait for its NBC deal to go through</a> before getting all jerky with the access to online video, telling Level 3 on November 19th that it would need to pay a fee to deliver video to Comcast customers. Level 3 delivers videos from many companies over its networks, but the timing is particularly notable since on November 11th it signed up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/22/report-twenty-percent-of-peak-downstream-internet-used-for-netf/">bandwidth-chewing Netflix</a> as a major customer. While this sounds like exactly the kind of anti-net neutrality nonsense that makes us want to crank some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/30/ok-gos-impassioned-plea-for-net-neutrality-quirky-videos/">OK Go</a>, Comcast has responded saying it's doing no such thing, and it's actually Level 3 seeking a competitive advantage by suddenly sending far more information onto Comcast's network than it accepts. The cable company goes on to claim this situation is no different than its existing deals with Level 3's competitors, and that as long as traffic remains in balance it is willing to allow access settlement free, but if they want to push their growth (read: Netflix) onto Comcast's pipes, they'll have to pay up. We'll wait and see if this is all just a simple negotiating ploy or a true strike in the battle over net neutrality, but you may still want to get a refresher course on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/engadget-explains-net-neutrality-and-our-full-interview-with/">exactly what net neutrality is all about from our friend Tim Wu</a> just in case.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comcast, Level 3 Communications square off over video streaming, network neutrality principles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/">Comcast, Level 3 Communications square off over video streaming, network neutrality principles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19737414/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/29/comcast-level-3-communications-square-off-over-video-streaming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backbone</category><category>cdn</category><category>comcast</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level 3 Communications</category><category>Level3</category><category>Level3Communications</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netflix</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>network</category><category>open internet</category><category>OpenInternet</category><category>watch instantly</category><category>WatchInstantly</category><category>xfinity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google, Verizon, Comcast, and more band together to form tech (and policy) advisory group]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-12-07-fast_internet.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
BITAG doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, as far as spoken acronyms go, but the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group (also goes by TAG, for short) is looking to make (radio) waves. Facilitated by former <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/FCC/">FCC</a> Chief Technologist (and University of Colorado at Boulder Adjunct Professor) Dale Hatfield, the group aims to "develop consensus on broadband network management practices and other related technical issues that can affect users' experience," which largely leads to addressing technical issues and making suggestions to policymakers. The group runs the gamut of major players in the broadband industry, including <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ATT/">AT&amp;T</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Cisco/">Cisco</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Comcast/">Comcast</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DISH/">DISH</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EchoStar/">EchoStar</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Google/">Google</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Level3/">Level 3</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Microsoft/">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TimeWarnerCable/">Time Warner Cable</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Verizon/">Verizon</a>. <br />
<br />
Naturally, the aforementioned companies already on board are lauding the move, and for its part the NCTA is happy to see a forum for tech and engineering experts to openly discuss issues and policies. Providing the counterargument would be the folks at <em>DSL Reports</em>, who show reserve that this may end up being nothing more than "policy dog and pony show" to avoid <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/fcc-submits-national-broadband-plan-to-congress-at-least-100m-u/">stricter government regulations</a> on network neutrality. At this point that remains to be seen, as this organization doesn't seem to have even hit infancy yet. Expect more in the coming weeks as it continues to form and attempts to organize. We submit for your perusal the press release, just after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google, Verizon, Comcast, and more band together to form tech (and policy) advisory group</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/">Google, Verizon, Comcast, and more band together to form tech (and policy) advisory group</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19510128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/google-verizon-comcast-and-more-band-together-to-form-tech-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>at and t</category><category>at t</category><category>AtAndT</category><category>AtT</category><category>bitag</category><category>broadband</category><category>broadband internet</category><category>broadband internet technical advisory group</category><category>BroadbandInternet</category><category>BroadbandInternetTechnicalAdvisoryGroup</category><category>cable</category><category>cisco</category><category>comcast</category><category>dale hatfield</category><category>DaleHatfield</category><category>dish</category><category>dsl</category><category>echo star</category><category>EchoStar</category><category>fcc</category><category>google</category><category>government</category><category>group</category><category>hatfield</category><category>intel</category><category>level 3</category><category>level three</category><category>Level3</category><category>LevelThree</category><category>microsoft</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>network neutrality</category><category>NetworkNeutrality</category><category>neutrality</category><category>policy</category><category>regulation</category><category>tag</category><category>technical advisory group</category><category>TechnicalAdvisoryGroup</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Level 3 to deliver uncompressed HD broadcast from Super Bowl XLIV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20100202005891&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/sb-header440.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
We're still not sure if this has any noticeable result on picture quality, but Level 3  has announced its going to assist in delivering <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/superbowl">Super Bowl XLIV's</a> feed  uncompressed from the site back to CBS headquarters in New York. Instead  of being compressed onsite in a production truck then sent to the  studio and stations where it's compressed again, this could help CBS  bring a more high quality signal home. If you've been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/">watching  Denver Broncos home games</a>, you've seen Level 3's Vyvx broadcast  network at work, we'll see how beautiful it keeps things looking in  Miami on Sunday.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/">Level 3 to deliver uncompressed HD broadcast from Super Bowl XLIV</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19342083/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/level-3-to-deliver-uncompressed-hd-broadcast-from-super-bowl-xli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>fiber</category><category>football</category><category>hd</category><category>level 3</category><category>Level3</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl xliv</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlXliv</category><category>uncompressed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Level 3 delivering end to end uncompressed video from Broncos home games]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.virtualpressoffice.com/publicsiteContentFileAccess/185489/185489.html/?fileContentId=185489&amp;fileName=185489.html&amp;fromOtherPageToDisableHistory=Y"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/mcdaniels_fistpump.jpg" /></a>Possible more notable than the Broncos 5-0 start (okay, not really, did anyone see this coming after that seemingly terrible offseason?) is the announcement from Level 3 Communications that its home games at Invesco Field are the first to have their video sent back to the broadcaster completely uncompressed. Thanks to its fiber connection laid in preparation for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/25/panasonic-hdtvs-take-center-stage-at-democratic-national-convent/">2008 Democratic National Convention</a>, the company sends a 1.5 Gbps stream directly to the broadcaster's home studio, as an alternative to the usual (and still in place while this new delivery is evaluated) method of compressing at the site on a production truck. VP Mark Taylor claims this allows them to get the absolute highest quality signal possible, but we'll wait until it's installed at more than one professional stadium to proclaim end to end uncompressed video delivery as the way of the future.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/fiber/" rel="tag">Fiber</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/">Level 3 delivering end to end uncompressed video from Broncos home games</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.virtualpressoffice.com/publicsiteContentFileAccess/185489/185489.html/?fileContentId=185489&amp;fileName=185489.html&amp;fromOtherPageToDisableHistory=Y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19194168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/level-3-delivering-end-to-end-uncompressed-video-from-broncos-ho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>denver broncos</category><category>DenverBroncos</category><category>fiber</category><category>hd</category><category>level 3</category><category>level 3 communications</category><category>Level3</category><category>Level3Communications</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ethernet speeds raised to 100 gigabits per second]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/11/14/100gbe/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/11/100gbe.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a></div>
Our consumer-grade home DSL is starting to look pretty paltry compared to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/24/new-record-set-for-fastest-data-transmission-2-56-terabits-a/">records</a> that are coming out of research labs these days. While we told you about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/30/ntt-sets-new-data-transmission-record-of-14-terabits-per-second/">latest speed record</a> of 14 terabits per second over fiber in Japan, that really doesn't help use mere mortals who are still using 100Base-T routers in our homes and offices -- even though about a month ago, we spied one of the first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/12/linksys-wrt350n-wireless-n-gigabit-router-with-storage-link/">gigabit routers</a> on the market, which raised our spirits a bit. Well our hopes have been kicked up a few more notches today, with the news from <em>GigaOm</em> that Infinera, the University of California Santa Cruz, Internet2 and Level3 Communications have just demoed a 100 gigabit per second Ethernet connection over a fiber network between Houston, Texas and Tampa, Florida. Now if only we could get the IEEE bureaucracy and networking manufacturers to move this fast -- we need at least a gigabit per second in our pads, like, last year.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/">Ethernet speeds raised to 100 gigabits per second</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gigaom.com/2006/11/14/100gbe/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/701813/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/15/ethernet-speeds-raised-to-100-gigabits-per-second/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>100 gigabits per second</category><category>100GigabitsPerSecond</category><category>ethernet</category><category>florida</category><category>houston</category><category>infinera</category><category>internet2</category><category>level3</category><category>speed</category><category>tampa</category><category>texas</category><category>transmission speeds</category><category>TransmissionSpeeds</category><category>uc santa cruz</category><category>UcSantaCruz</category><category>ucsc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyrus Farivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
