<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm wants more metrics than talk and standby times]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199700910"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/seidio-extended-battery002.gif" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/qualcomm/">Qualcomm</a> wants the makers of cellphones to move past the standard talk and standby times and into more important mobile metrics, according to the company. We kinda think that talk and standby times are still important, but there must be more, right? The device, network and feature fragmentation that's all over modern dumb / semi-smart / smartphones these days probably does deserve some kind of metrics package that's equal across manufacturers and carriers. Qualcomm suggests metrics like "video time," "average use time" and "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/">multimedia time</a>," although we think those metrics can't be explained nearly as easily as a spec like "you can talk for XX hours on this device" just due to a plethora of variables to explain each of those. Let's hope they manage to strike a balance.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/">Qualcomm wants more metrics than talk and standby times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199700910>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/928848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/qualcomm-wants-more-metrics-than-talk-and-standby-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cellphone metrics</category><category>cellphone standby times</category><category>cellphone talk times</category><category>CellphoneMetrics</category><category>CellphoneStandbyTimes</category><category>CellphoneTalkTimes</category><category>mobile</category><category>Mobile metrics</category><category>MobileMetrics</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia to Qualcomm: stop infringing on our MediaFLO!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nokia.com/A4136001?newsid=1132156"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/nokia-vs-qualcomm.jpg"  alt="" /></a>In the latest edition of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/nokia-qualcomm-considering-arbitration-to-make-amends/">love-hate Nokia-Qualcomm legal nastiness</a> that's taking up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/29/nokia-fights-back-files-countersuit-against-qualcomm/">way too much time</a> these days, those mobile phone giants in Finland have asked a Texas court to make Qualcomm stop infringing on six of its  MediaFLO implementations. Nokia has some gall to countersue Qualcomm over some specific tailoring of the MediaFLO and BREW standards seing as both are Qualcomm technologies. Those Finns are accusing Qualcomm here of "effectively copying Nokia's innovations." And, Nokia says that its patents are at the core of MediaFLO (broadcast quality) and BREW (application download enabling). Why don't these two just get in the ring and rumble? Enough with silly suits/countersuits already.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/multimedia/" rel="tag">Multimedia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/">Nokia to Qualcomm: stop infringing on our MediaFLO!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nokia.com/A4136001?newsid=1132156>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/920812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/nokia-to-qualcomm-stop-infringing-on-our-mediaflo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>mobile</category><category>multimedia</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Nokia Qualcomm Lawsuit</category><category>NokiaQualcommLawsuit</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm Lawsuit</category><category>QualcommLawsuit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm spat may slow 3G rollout, says Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070529/bs_nm/nokia3g_dc_1"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/04/nokia-vs-qualcomm.jpg" alt="" /></a>While Nokia and Qualcomm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/06/nokia-pays-20-million-to-qualcomm-to-use-umts/">continue various spats</a> and other legal nonsense to the nth degree, the future of 3G may be at risk. Well, not really -- but Nokia says it could very well slow things down, and mobile WiMAX and other technology that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/07/qualcomm-chips-to-power-3g-world-phones/">Qualcomm</a> can't claim exclusive license to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/">may be a possible answer</a>. Qualcomm may be in for a bit of shock as the world's transition to 3G technology will mean more and more reluctance to pay any entity royalties. One thing seems clear here -- these two companies don't seem eager to settle on anything these days.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-nokia-sees-3g-delayed-td-scdma-to-start-next-year/">mocoNews.net</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/">Qualcomm spat may slow 3G rollout, says Nokia</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070529/bs_nm/nokia3g_dc_1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/906272/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/30/qualcomm-spat-may-slow-3g-rollout-says-nokia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3G</category><category>CDMA2000</category><category>China 3G</category><category>China3g</category><category>mobile</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>nokia 3G</category><category>nokia d-scdma</category><category>Nokia3g</category><category>NokiaD-scdma</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm 3G</category><category>Qualcomm3g</category><category>TD-SCDMA</category><category>W-CDMA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm planning healthcare MVNO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wirelessweek.com/article.aspx?id=147854"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/qcomm.jpg" alt="" /></a>As if the U.S. doesn't <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/new-mvnos-finding-themselves-in-a-world-of-hurt/">have enough MVNOs</a> these days, CDMA pioneer Qualcomm plans on launching one with a healthcare focus. The new company, LifeComm, has been designed to have broad customer appeal -- not just for medical professionals -- and was created by Qualcomm and some unnamed partners. It's reportedly set for launch sometime in late 2008, featuring in-phone services that give advice and information on fitness, weight management or reduction, diabetes management and heart health. Past the phone, the MVNO will also offer services for wellness, fitness and even health maintenance. With ESPN Mobile <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/03/mobile-espn-us-out-india-in/">folding not long ago</a>, will such a narrow focus be enough for LifeComm?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-qualcomm-plans-healthcare-mvno/">mocoNews</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mvnos/" rel="tag">MVNOs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/">Qualcomm planning healthcare MVNO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 May 2007 20:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.wirelessweek.com/article.aspx?id=147854>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/898587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/qualcomm-planning-healthcare-mvno/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CDMA</category><category>mobile</category><category>Mobile virtual network operator</category><category>MobileVirtualNetworkOperator</category><category>MVNO</category><category>mvnos</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>U.S. MVNO</category><category>U.s.Mvno</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 20:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm revenue jumps in first quarter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.qualcomm.com/press/PDF/qcom_Q207earnings.pdf"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/qualcomm.03.jpg" /></a>The CDMA and royalty pioneer known as Qualcomm unearthed a $2.22 billion revenue figure for the first three months of 2007 (not bad, eh?). That rather large figure boasts a 21 percent increase from the year-ago period in 2006, so naturally, we had to ask -- what has Qualcomm been up to? The company replied that "stronger than expected chipset demand" is driving strong sales so far in 2007 and it will continue throughout 2007. Qualcomm continues to pour tons of money into its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/17/mediaflo-gets-fcc-green-light/">MediaFLO</a> unit as well. The company increased R&amp;D expenses to the tune of 16 percent ($454 million) in the first quarter -- with most of that going into MediaFLO. We think that's a pretty large bet on mobile multimedia from Qualcomm, but hey -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/23/verizon-wireless-to-launch-mobile-tv-soon/">Verizon's onboard</a> already, right? Let's have a toast, shall we? [Warning: PDF link]<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-earnings-qualcomm-revenues-up-21-percent/">mocoNews</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cdma/" rel="tag">CDMA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/">Qualcomm revenue jumps in first quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 May 2007 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.qualcomm.com/press/PDF/qcom_Q207earnings.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/886399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/qualcomm-revenue-jumps-in-first-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cdma</category><category>mobile</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm CDMA</category><category>Qualcomm financials</category><category>Qualcomm Profit</category><category>Qualcomm royalties</category><category>QualcommCdma</category><category>QualcommFinancials</category><category>QualcommProfit</category><category>QualcommRoyalties</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm files five new patent suits against Nokia]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070403/bs_nm/qualcomm_nokia_dc"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/04/nokia-vs-qualcomm.jpg" /></a>We're just about to give both Nokia and Qualcomm some fightin' gloves if the two <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/nokia-qualcomm-considering-arbitration-to-make-amends/">can't find some happy middle ground</a> between their constant sparring in the press and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/28/stay-issued-in-nokia-qualcomm-suit/">on the telecom stage</a>. In the latest round, Qualcomm has filed two new lawsuits against Nokia for -- you guessed it -- alleged infringement of five patents. Of concern to Qualcomm this <strike>month</strike> week is the company's apparent ownership of anything related to the abbreviation CDMA, as it sees Nokia using its technology used in some of its phones for the downloading of applications over wireless networks and related infringing against speech encoders used in certain Nokia handsets. <em>Qualcomm, 0. Nokia, 0</em>. For today, at least.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cdma/" rel="tag">CDMA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/">Qualcomm files five new patent suits against Nokia</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070403/bs_nm/qualcomm_nokia_dc>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/867383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/04/qualcomm-files-five-new-patent-suits-against-nokia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cdma</category><category>mobile</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Nokia lawsuit</category><category>Nokia Qualcomm lawsuit</category><category>NokiaLawsuit</category><category>NokiaQualcommLawsuit</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm lawsuit</category><category>QualcommLawsuit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Broadcom wants to ban all U.S. phones with Qualcomm chips]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130050-c,cellphones/article.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/03/broadcom-qualcomm.jpg" alt="" /></a>After we thought Qualcomm and Broadcom had at least <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/11/qualcomm-avoids-chip-ban-in-broadcom-suit/">kissed and made up</a> a little, Broadcom dropped a bit of a bombshell this week: the wireless chipset company asked the International Trade Commission (ITC) to ban the import of Qualcomm-containing mobile phones to the U.S. The handsets in question feature certain Qualcomm processors involved in the long-running patent infringement lawsuit between the two wireless companies. Broadcom told the ITC that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/qualcomm">Qualcomm</a> would be "rewarded for patent infringement" activities if all Qualcomm chip-containing handsets were not banned from being imported into the U.S. In other news, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel and Alltel said they would immediately <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/qualcomm-suit-kindly-asks-nokia-to-halt-us-gsm-sales/">switch to GSM</a> and give away free <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/05/nokia-n73-review-roundup/">Nokia N73</a> handsets to all customers. Just kidding -- we can have fun too, you see?<br /><br />[Thanks, Wil]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/1xrtt/" rel="tag">1xRTT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ev-do/" rel="tag">EV-DO</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cdma/" rel="tag">CDMA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/">Broadcom wants to ban all U.S. phones with Qualcomm chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130050-c,cellphones/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/859118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/23/broadcom-wants-to-ban-all-u-s-phones-with-qualcomm-chips/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1XRTT</category><category>Broadcom</category><category>CDMA</category><category>ev do</category><category>EV-DO</category><category>evdo</category><category>mobile</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcom CDMA</category><category>QualcomCdma</category><category>Qualcomm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia and Qualcomm ready to play nice because of WiMax?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.phonenews.com/content/view/1855/1/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/sn-qcom-nok.gif" /></a>Qualcomm and Nokia, the two heavyweight fighters in a long and drawn out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/qualcomm-suit-kindly-asks-nokia-to-halt-us-gsm-sales/">nasty battle</a> over intellectual property rights are possibly burying the hatchet (just not in each other's backs.) Both companies are having a press conference along with Sprint Nextel a week from tomorrow (Feb. 28). Now, when you get Qualcomm and Sprint Nextel together, nothing seems out of place. Inject Nokia in there and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/nokia-qualcomm-considering-arbitration-to-make-amends/">there is something afoot</a> -- but what? With Sprint Nextel committed to WiMax for its 4G plans and Nokia shaking hands with Sprint Nextel on that turf, maybe Nokia and Qualcomm are close to shaking hands in some form after years of issues that left Nokia holding an expensive but worthless 1xRTT bag of, well, nothing. Maybe WiMax will be the glue that reseals that relationship.<br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nokia/" rel="tag">Nokia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sprint/" rel="tag">Sprint</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/1xrtt/" rel="tag">1xRTT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ev-do/" rel="tag">EV-DO</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cdma/" rel="tag">CDMA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/">Nokia and Qualcomm ready to play nice because of WiMax?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.phonenews.com/content/view/1855/1/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/755748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/20/nokia-and-qualcomm-ready-to-play-nice-because-of-wimax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3G</category><category>cdma</category><category>CDMA patents</category><category>CdmaPatents</category><category>ev do</category><category>evdo</category><category>FON</category><category>mobile</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Nokia Qualcomm</category><category>NokiaQualcomm</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>sprint</category><category>Sprint 4G</category><category>Sprint Nextel</category><category>Sprint Nextel WiMax</category><category>Sprint4g</category><category>SprintNextel</category><category>SprintNextelWimax</category><category>WiMax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
