<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[So, what'd you get?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/kid-freaking-out-christmas.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Yeah, it's pretty unfortunate that you've got to work tomorrow (well, unless you're down with Boxing Day), but let's take it one 24-hour window at a time, shall we? It's not as if you've had any shortage of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">gizmos to choose from</a> this year, and while you <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/asus-delays-transformer-primes-release-until-wifi-fix-is-found/">aren't likely</a> to get a Transformer Prime, there's plenty of other stocking stuffers to look forward to. Speaking of which, what'd you find under your tree this morning? A <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/amazon-kindle-fire-review/">Kindle Fire</a>? That new laptop you've been longing for? A few new cables to do... cable-y things with? Let us know in comments below, and be sure to press play on your way there. Hopefully that's not your kid.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>When you're done, check out what people got jazzed about in </strong></em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/12/25/howd-you-do/"><em><strong>2004</strong></em></a><em><strong>, </strong></em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/"><em><strong>2005</strong></em></a><em><strong>, </strong></em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/"><em><strong>2006</strong></em></a><em><strong>, </strong></em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/"><em><strong>2007</strong></em></a><em><strong>, </strong></em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/"><em><strong>2008</strong></em></a><em><strong>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/">2009</a> </strong></em><em><strong>and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/">2010</a></strong></em><em><strong>.</strong></em><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>So, what'd you get?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/">So, what'd you get?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20134979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/25/so-whatd-you-get/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christmas</category><category>gadget</category><category>gadgets</category><category>gift</category><category>gifting</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>present</category><category>So</category><category>so whatd you get</category><category>SoWhatdYouGet</category><category>video</category><category>whatd you get</category><category>WhatdYouGet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple to require in-app subscriptions for periodicals by March 31st, fine print still a bit fuzzy]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/the-daily-top-in-app-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
We knew <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TheDaily/">The Daily</a> was to be just the first drop what's destined to be a flood of titles with in-app purchases for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iTunesstore/">iTunes store</a>, but we weren't quite sure how hard Apple would be twisting the faucet -- until now, that is. According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, Cupertino will reject any newspaper or magazine app that doesn't take subscription payments through the iTunes store. It doesn't have to be <em>solely</em> Apple's store -- developers can still sell through websites <em>in addition</em> to the mandated in-app option. (If you recall, this is the same issue that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/apple-rejects-sony-reader-app-doesnt-want-you-buying-content-f/">Sony Reader for iOS</a> just faced.) There are a few big questions lingering out there: will the 70 / 30 revenue sharing apply? Does the "rejection" apply to apps already in the store like Amazon's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Kindle/">Kindle</a>? You bet your (virtual) bottom dollar we'll be finding out soon enough.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/">Apple to require in-app subscriptions for periodicals by March 31st, fine print still a bit fuzzy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19826510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/02/apple-to-require-in-app-subscriptions-for-periodicals-by-march-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>app store</category><category>apple</category><category>apple app store</category><category>AppleAppStore</category><category>applications</category><category>apps</category><category>AppStore</category><category>e book</category><category>e books</category><category>e reader</category><category>e readers</category><category>e-book</category><category>e-books</category><category>e-reader</category><category>e-readers</category><category>ios</category><category>ipad</category><category>iphone</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>itunes</category><category>reader</category><category>reader store</category><category>ReaderStore</category><category>rejected</category><category>rejection</category><category>so</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[So, opening a sentence with 'so' started with programmers and engineers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/"><img border="0" align="left" vspace="16" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/06-17-10so.jpg" alt="" /></a>So, here's a great piece by Anand Giridharadas in the<i> New York Times</i> on using "so" to start sentences -- a practice that apparently started with engineers and programmers in Silicon Valley in the 90s, and something Microsoft employees also claim started with them. Obviously we use it a ton at Engadget -- at this point we're all riffing on each other, but I know I picked it up from San Francisco-based Ryan Block when I first started. Interesting to see how small parts of tech culture like this are influenced by so many variables -- Giridharadas says "so" makes it easier for people of different backgrounds and languages to communicate, because it's a catch-all transition that almost always works, implying a understanding of what's come before. I rather like that.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/">So, opening a sentence with 'so' started with programmers and engineers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19520862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/so-opening-a-sentence-with-so-started-with-programmers-and-en/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>culture</category><category>language</category><category>slang</category><category>so</category><category>tech culture</category><category>TechCulture</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocker: Americans spend more time with PC than spouse]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20070122/CLM05422012007-1.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/1-23-07-hugging_computer.jpg" alt="" /></a>While one may argue that a computer doesn't talk back, disagree, or rub one the wrong way as we're sure just about everyone's spouse / SO definitely can, you must have somehow avoided the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/the-gizmondo-gets-some-bsod-love/">BSOD</a>, kernel <a href="http://transportation.engadget.com/2005/12/28/mac-os-x-updates-disable-and-or-damage-powerbook-memory-hardware/3">error</a>, 404, clicking HDD, invalid drivers, and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/11/07/this-season-black-is-the-new-blue-screen-of-death/">host</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/20/wii-being-hit-by-fatal-error-110213-could-be-funky-firmware/">other</a> "cyber stresses" that can elicit all sorts of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/29/more-proof-that-violent-video-games-breed-rage/">rage</a> and frustration. A recent survey conducted by Kelton Research discovered that a majority of Americans (52-percent) said their "most recent experience with a computer problem provoked emotions such as anger, sadness or alienation," yet a whopping 65-percent of these same folks spend more time with their beloved computer than their own spouse. Adding even more fuel to the computer addict fire, 84-percent of responders stated that they were "more dependent on their home computer now than they were just three years ago." Interestingly enough, rather than founding some sort of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/15/rehab-center-for-video-game-addicts-opens-in-amsterdam/">rehab facility</a> to coax folks away from the keyboard and back into reality, SupportSoft is looking to provide loving, caring advice to help folks suffering from "cyber stress" solve their PC troubles without tearing down the house. Essentially, the service actually encourages folks glued to their computer to stay that way, as the new startup looks to provide answers to the issues that could eventually run even the most loyal computer user back to their oft forgotten spouse, but the company does insinuate that by solving PC quandaries, folks will have more time to spend when the ones they love. Nevertheless, we can't say these figures are entirely shocking, especially when you consider that folks would take an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/09/ipod-or-drinking-students-prefer-ipod/">iPod over booze</a> and nearly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/16/1-in-8-blokes-would-swap-their-lady-for-a-must-have-gadget/">anything trendy for an SO</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/2007/01/22/computer_home/">TGDaily</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/">Shocker: Americans spend more time with PC than spouse</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20070122/CLM05422012007-1.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/740927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/23/shocker-americans-spend-more-time-with-pc-than-spouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>addict</category><category>addicted</category><category>americans</category><category>boyfriend</category><category>computer</category><category>culture</category><category>Cyber Stress</category><category>CyberStress</category><category>girlfriend</category><category>husband</category><category>lifestyle</category><category>so</category><category>spouse</category><category>survey</category><category>wife</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
