<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Core 2 Quad S-Series shaves power consumption to 65W]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://processorfinder.intel.com/List.aspx?ParentRadio=All&amp;ProcFam=2774&amp;SearchKey="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intel-s-series-core-2-quad.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
In a relatively hush-hush manner, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a> recently slipped out energy saving versions of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Core2Quad/">Core 2 Quad</a> Q8200, Q9400 and Q9550 CPUs, all of which are suffixed with a simple "s." Put simply, these S-Series chips are built using the same 45 nanometer process technology as used on the regular models, and aside from TDP, all the specifications are exactly alike. The difference comes in power consumption, as the S crew sucks down just 65 watts compared to 95 watts in the standard issue models. <em>Tom's Hardware</em> had a chance to handle, benchmark and report on these new power sippers, and lucky for you, they found performance to be equal to that of the higher power chips. Granted, you'll have to pony up a few extra bucks in order to treat Mother Earth (and your energy bill) better, but at least we're working down the power ladder instead of the other way around.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-2-q9550s,2162-2.html">Tom's Hardware</a>, thanks <a href="http://thenotebookgamer.com/?p=97">Jonathan</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/">Intel Core 2 Quad S-Series shaves power consumption to 65W</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://processorfinder.intel.com/List.aspx?ParentRadio=All&amp;ProcFam=2774&amp;SearchKey=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1501474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/intel-core-2-quad-s-series-shaves-power-consumption-to-65w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>chip</category><category>core 2 quad</category><category>core 2 quad s series</category><category>Core2Quad</category><category>Core2QuadSSeries</category><category>cpu</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>intel</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>processor</category><category>Q8200S</category><category>Q9400S</category><category>Q9550S</category><category>s series</category><category>SSeries</category><category>Wolfdale</category><category>Yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Core 2 Duo E8500 Wolfdale gets tested]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Wolfdale/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-1-08-e8500.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
If you'll recall, we already witnessed a pre-production Wolfdale CPU <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/">outpace its competition</a> back in August of last year, but the real deal has finally arrived. Over at <em>Hot Hardware</em>, the folks were able to crack open a retail Core 2 Duo E8500 processor, which comes in at 3.16GHz and features 6MB of L2 cache, a 1,333MHz FSB speed and is built on 45-nanometer technology. When put to the test, reviewers found this luscious piece of silicon to be quite the performer, noting that it was probably a better choice for gamers than a low-end quad-core chip. Still, with an expected price of just under three bills, it wasn't exactly seen as the greatest of values, but if you've got the coin and happen to fit the market, the "Recommended" badge tells you everything you need to know.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/">Intel's Core 2 Duo E8500 Wolfdale gets tested</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Wolfdale/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1128827/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/01/intels-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-gets-tested/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarked</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>core 2 duo</category><category>Core2Duo</category><category>dual-core</category><category>E8500</category><category>intel</category><category>wolfdale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 45nm Yorkfield / Wolfdale CPUs get benchmarked, new rumored release dates]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=454"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/9.29.06---intel.jpg"  alt="" /></a>According to a report from TechARP that includes benchmarks of all the chips mentioned, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a> could have nailed a release date for its 45nm Yorkfield and Wolfdale CPUs. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/gazing-down-intels-roadmap-quad-core-yorkfield-set-for-q3-2007/">Q3 2007</a> now translates to November 11th, if this report is to be believed, for the launch of the first, the most powerful, and the most expensive -- $999 -- of the Yorkfields: the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, a quad core, 3GHz clocked, 2 x 6MB L2 Cache chip. Later on in January next year will come the Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450 and Q9300, with progressively lower clock speeds, and only (hah!) 2 x 3MB of L2 Cache for the Q9300. The Core 2 Duo E8000 series -- the Wolfdales -- will hit around the same time as the slower Yorkfields, hitting speeds of 3.16GHz and L2 Cache sizes of 6MB in the E8500, going down to 2.66GHz in the E8200.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/01/1640201&amp;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/">Intel's 45nm Yorkfield / Wolfdale CPUs get benchmarked, new rumored release dates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=454>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1003079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/02/intels-45nm-yorkfield-wolfdale-cpus-get-benchmarked-new-rumo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>CPU</category><category>Intel</category><category>Wolfdale</category><category>Yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel fleshes out 45nm Yorkfield launch details]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=9070"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2007/09/9-19-07-intellogo.jpg" alt="" /></a>It's been quite a while since we've heard anything from Intel on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Yorkfield">Yorkfield</a> front, but that looks to have changed in a hurry, with the company now busting out a whole slew of specifics on the forthcoming processors. First up is news that Intel will be releasing an "<span class="ArticleSummary" id="ctl00_MainContent_lblSummary">Extreme Edition" of the 45nm quad-core processor on November 12th, well ahead of the January 2008 launch for its decidedly less-extreme counterparts. Helping the processor (dubbed the QX9650) earn that designation is its top of the crop 3.0GHz clock speed, along with 12MB of L2 cache, and an extremely hot 130W TDP rating, not to mention a price just shy of $1,000. If that's all a bit <em>too</em> extreme for you, you'll also be able to get your choice of 2.5GHz, 2.66GHz, or 2.88GHz models, each of which scale the TDP rating down to a more manageable 95W, with prices running $266, $316, and $530, respectively. Even further on down the line, Intel's announced details on three dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Wolfdale+">Wolfdale</a> desktop processors, which clock in at 2.66GHz, 3.0GHz, and 3.16GHz. No word on a price for the low-end model just yet, but the 3.0GHz and 3.16GHz are apparently set to run $183 and $266, respectively, with a </span><span id="ctl00_MainContent_lblBody"> mid-range 2.83 GHz version expected to eventually round out the lot, according to DailyTech. As if that wasn't enough, Intel's will also apparently be slipping out a 65nm 2.4 GHz dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Conroe+">Conroe</a> processor dubbed the </span><span id="ctl00_MainContent_lblBody">E4600 on October 21st, although there's no word on what it'll cost.<br /></span><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/">Intel fleshes out 45nm Yorkfield launch details</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=9070>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1000926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/intel-fleshes-out-45nm-yorkfield-launch-details/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>desktop processor</category><category>DesktopProcessor</category><category>intel</category><category>processor</category><category>wolfdale</category><category>yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Wolfdale processor gets benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hkepc.com%2Fbbs%2Fhwdb.php%3Ftid%3D837360%26tp%3DIntel-Penryn-Preview%26rid%3D837360&amp;langpair=ja%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;prev=%2Flanguage_tools"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/8-7-07-wolfdale.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Calm down, you haven't overslept by a couple of months or anything, as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Wolfdale/">Wolfdale</a> we're talking about here is in fact simply a 2.33GHz engineering sample of the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dualcore/">dual-core</a> processor. Nevertheless, HKPEC labs was able to pit it against the 2.33GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=E6550">E6550</a>, and the results weren't too shabby. In a slew of tests including PC Mark, CineBench, Science Mark, SiSoft Sandra, and individual application trials, the Wolfdale managed to best the E6550 in every single facet. Of course, it didn't exactly blow the current Core 2 Duo out of the water, but increasing performance by nearly 11-percent in Doom 3 and Far Cry, 5.53-percent in PC Mark, and around 8-percent in Office applications isn't anything to sneeze at. Still, we've got <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/">quite a ride</a> ahead before seeing a finalized Wolfdale, but feel free to humor yourself with the preliminary benchmarks below.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=41520">The Inquirer</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/">Intel's Wolfdale processor gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hkepc.com%2Fbbs%2Fhwdb.php%3Ftid%3D837360%26tp%3DIntel-Penryn-Preview%26rid%3D837360&amp;langpair=ja%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;prev=%2Flanguage_tools>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/960405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>bechmarks</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarked</category><category>core 2 duo</category><category>Core2Duo</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>intel</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>processor</category><category>wolfdale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Welcome+Back+HyperThreading/article5921c.htm"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/1-17-07-penryn.jpg" /></a>Just to keep us all guessing, Intel has announced that it will be "launching" 45nm chips across all of its main processor categories in Q1 2008. This would seem to run counter to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/29/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/">prior roadmap plans</a> that call for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/">Penryn</a> to start shipping near the end of 2007, but apparently those plans are still on, Intel just won't be busting out the ticker-tape until 2008. Alongside this confusion, Intel has also fleshed out info 'bout its first two Penryn-based products, the quad-core Yorkfield and dual-core Wolfdale desktop processors. Wolfdale packs a 1333MHz front-side bus, with up to 6MB L2 cache, while Yorkfield is essentially a pair of Wolfdales glued together, though the front-side bus is reduced to 1066MHz. The chips also mark the return of Hyper-Threading of some sort, but according to Intel: "The official company policy is that our engineers have left the door open for Hyper-Threading, but we cannot confirm or deny any future plans for the technology," so it sounds like we won't know exactly what Intel is planning to do with that dubious technology it killed off when building its Core and Core 2 products until we get a bit closer to launch time.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/">Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/Welcome+Back+HyperThreading/article5921c.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/746001/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>penryn</category><category>wolfdale</category><category>yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel sez Penryn's done, lookout for 45nm Wolfdale / Yorkfield]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/01/17/intel_tapes_out_penryn/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/1-17-07-penryn.jpg"  alt="" /></a>If you're desperate for some positive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel/">Intel</a> news after hearing those less-than-inspiring margin forecasts earlier today, the chipmaker is once again keeping itself <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=%2Bintel+%2Broadmap">on track</a> in regard to pumping out its forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=45nm">45-nanometer</a> processors. While <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/">we were briefed</a> on the dual-core Wolfdale and quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/gazing-down-intels-roadmap-quad-core-yorkfield-set-for-q3-2007/">Yorkfield</a> just a few weeks back, Intel is now claiming that its Penryn-based chips are "complete" and will play nice with Windows Vista, Mac OS X, and Linux operating systems when they hit the shelves. Both chips are (still) slated to hit production during the second half of this year, with manufacturing to hit full stride during 2008. Penryn is supposed to "extend the Core 2 architecture" by playing host to the next set of Intel's Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE), and will also lend a hand in the future development of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Montevina">Montevina</a>, and just in case you're the (way) forward-looking type, you can expect Penryn's successor -- dubbed Nehalem -- to roll out in late '08.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/">Intel sez Penryn's done, lookout for 45nm Wolfdale / Yorkfield</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/01/17/intel_tapes_out_penryn/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/737735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/17/intel-sez-penryns-done-lookout-for-45nm-wolfdale-yorkfield/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>architecture</category><category>core2quad</category><category>dual-core</category><category>intel</category><category>intel roadmap</category><category>IntelRoadmap</category><category>montevina</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>penryn</category><category>quad-core</category><category>roadmap</category><category>wolfdale</category><category>yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel adds new desktop processors to roadmap]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/intel-roadmap-440.jpg"  style="margin: auto; display: block;" alt="" />It looks like those playing along with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=%2Bintel+%2Broadmap">Intel's roadmap</a> at home have a bit of updating to do to their scorecards, with <em>HKEPC Hardware </em>revealing a few new details on the chip maker's plans for the new year. The biggest bit of news this time around concerns Intel's new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=45nm">45nm</a> dual-core desktop processor, now codenamed "Wolfdale," which will have a thermal design power rating (TDP) of 65W, in line with current Core 2 Duo processors. Look for it to launch sometime in the fourth quarter of  this year. Intel has also firmed up a few more details on its quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/gazing-down-intels-roadmap-quad-core-yorkfield-set-for-q3-2007/">Yorkfield </a>processor, with it clocking in with a 95W TDP and apparently still on track for a (late) Q3 release this year.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/01/05/intel_wolfdale_yorkfield_roadmap/">Reg Hardware</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/">Intel adds new desktop processors to roadmap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/730041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/05/intel-adds-new-desktop-processors-to-roadmap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>core 2 duo</category><category>Core2Duo</category><category>dual core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>intel</category><category>intel roadmap</category><category>IntelRoadmap</category><category>processor</category><category>quad core</category><category>QuadCore</category><category>roadmap</category><category>wolfdale</category><category>yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
