<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Google: 450,000 Android Apps now available to 300 million devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/androidstand.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> If you hadn't noticed, it's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mwc2012/">Mobile World Congress</a> this week and Google's showing off its enormous booth packed to the gills with smiling green Androids. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/">Andy Rubin</a> insouciantly added that the Android Marketplace has reached its latest milestone: there are now 450,000 apps available for the platform. Other pertinent stats are that over a billion apps are downloaded every month and that 850,000 Android devices are activated each day -- meaning that there's more than 300 million of them worldwide. Of course, that's not the real story here at MWC, it's that the company have brought along a bedazzling booth for guests to glue as many false jewels to their Galaxy Nexus back-plate as their self-respect can handle.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/">Google: 450,000 Android Apps now available to 300 million devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180244/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/google-450-000-android-apps-now-available-to-300-million-device/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>000 Apps</category><category>000Apps</category><category>300 Million</category><category>300Million</category><category>450</category><category>Android</category><category>Android Market Milestone</category><category>AndroidMarketMilestone</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>App Store Milestone</category><category>AppStoreMilestone</category><category>Business</category><category>Google</category><category>Milestone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MWC</category><category>MWC 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>Numbers</category><category>Stats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Android and iOS share a merry little Christmas: seven million total device activations]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/rubin-tweet.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Google's SVP of Mobile just provided us with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/">another glimpse</a> inside the horse's mouth, claiming that Android scored 3.7 million new device activations over Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. To put that in context, Flurry reported that total Android and iOS activations on Christmas Day alone totaled 6.8 million. If we can accept a very high margin of error, and if we assume that the vast majority of Rubin's activations were on the 25th, then we might extrapolate a roughly even split between the two rival platforms. Considering where Android was just a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/14/shocker-android-grew-us-market-share-after-q2-ios-was-static/">couple of Christmas's ago</a>, it's no wonder that Mr Rubin is in the tweeting mood.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/">Android and iOS share a merry little Christmas: seven million total device activations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20136295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/android-and-ios-share-a-merry-little-christmas-seven-million-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011</category><category>activation</category><category>activations</category><category>Amazon Appstore</category><category>AmazonAppstore</category><category>android</category><category>Android Market</category><category>AndroidMarket</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>app downloads</category><category>app store</category><category>app stores</category><category>AppDownloads</category><category>apple</category><category>apple ios</category><category>AppleIos</category><category>apps</category><category>AppStore</category><category>AppStores</category><category>Christmas</category><category>Christmas 2011</category><category>Christmas2011</category><category>figures</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>ios</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>platform</category><category>statistics</category><category>stats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Andy Rubin defines 'Android activation,' trumpets 700,000 per day clip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/galaxy-s-ii-japan.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Looking for growth? You've found it. If you'll recall, Google's own Senior Vice President of Mobile Andy Rubin <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/">confirmed</a> that over 500,000 Android devices were being activated back in June, and during last month's Galaxy Nexus <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/samsung-and-googles-ice-cream-sandwich-event-liveblog/">reveal</a>, we learned that said figure had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/google-200-million-android-devices-activated-over-550-000-acti/">increased</a> to 550,000 per day. In just over a month, the tally has now climbed to 700,000 per 24 hour period. That's according to a post by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/">Andy</a> himself on Google+, which he followed with this:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		<em>"For those wondering, we count each device only once (i.e., we don't count re-sold devices), and "activations" means you go into a store, buy a device [and] put it on the network by subscribing to a wireless service."</em></p>
</blockquote>
In other words, there are many, many more Android devices being ushered into use every single day that don't connect to any monitored wireless service, but naturally, keeping track of those is something even Google isn't about to attempt. Any guesses as to what this figure jumps to after the holiday season concludes?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/">Google's Andy Rubin defines 'Android activation,' trumpets 700,000 per day clip</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20132539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/googles-andy-rubin-defines-android-activation-trumpets-700-0/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activation</category><category>activationsa</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>business</category><category>eclair</category><category>froyo</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>ice cream sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>sales</category><category>statistics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's 'very close' to launching a digital download store with 'a little twist']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/google-music.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 357px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>Google Music may well be lacking a little spice right now, but here at AsiaD, SVP Andy Rubin <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/?sort=newest&amp;refresh=120">just confirmed</a> that his company's "very close" to coming up with a digital download store, just as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/14/google-to-launch-mp3-store-in-coming-weeks/">rumored</a> earlier this month. Additionally, this service will even include "a little twist" of some sort, so we should expect something more than just an ordinary MP3 store. While record companies weren't willing to bargain with the company in the way they were with Apple, Andy said he's feeling mighty optimistic that Google's "almost there" with ironing out the necessary deals, so Android fans should sit tight and keep an eye out for a launch soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/">Google's 'very close' to launching a digital download store with 'a little twist'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20085091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/googles-very-close-to-launching-a-digital-download-store-with/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>asiad</category><category>asiad 2011</category><category>Asiad2011</category><category>breaking news</category><category>digital download</category><category>digital music</category><category>DigitalDownload</category><category>DigitalMusic</category><category>google</category><category>google music</category><category>GoogleMusic</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>music</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin: Ice Cream Sandwich's Face Unlock is developed by PittPatt]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/ice-cream-sandwich-android-4.jpg" style="width: 524px; height: 465px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>Liking that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/ice-cream-sandwich-face-unlock-demo-video/">Face Unlock</a> on Ice Cream Sandwich we saw this morning? You can thank PittPatt for that. Here at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/?sort=newest&amp;refresh=120">AsiaD's opening session</a>, Android head honcho Andy Rubin just confirmed that said Pittsburgh-based company -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/23/google-acquires-pittpatt-wants-to-know-you-on-a-face-to-face-ba/">acquired</a> by Google earlier this year -- was responsible for this nifty security feature. While the demo didn't go as planned for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Matias+Duarte">Matias Duarte</a> at the launch event, Andy was able to show us how Face Unlock's meant to work on the stage just now. In fact, Andy said his team even had to "slow down the process" as PittPatt's software was too fast to make folks believe that any security at all was involved -- for what it's worth, Walt Mossberg's beard couldn't get past the unlock screen on Andy's Galaxy Nexus. Head on over to our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/samsung-galaxy-nexus-hands-on/">hands-on video</a> to see us getting up close and personal with Face Unlock.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/">Andy Rubin: Ice Cream Sandwich's Face Unlock is developed by PittPatt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20085064/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/andy-rubin-ice-cream-sandwichs-face-unlock-is-developed-by-pit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>android</category><category>android 4.0</category><category>Android4.0</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>asiad</category><category>asiad 2011</category><category>Asiad2011</category><category>cellphone</category><category>face unlock</category><category>FaceUnlock</category><category>facial recognition</category><category>FacialRecognition</category><category>google</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobile phone</category><category>MobilePhone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>OS</category><category>phone</category><category>PittPatt</category><category>security</category><category>smartphone</category><category>software</category><category>tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Liveblog from AsiaD: Andy Rubin, SVP of Mobile at Google]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/asia-d-logo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Thought today's festivities were over from Hong Kong? Think again. While Samsung and Google tag-teamed the morning with the introduction of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/samsung-galaxy-nexus-hands-on/">Galaxy Nexus</a>, the first-ever AsiaD conference is kicking off as the sun sets over Victoria Harbour. The opening keynote is quite the impressive one, with Google's own Senior Vice President of Mobile, Andy Rubin, on the docket. Mr. Rubin's no stranger to these events -- in fact, we've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/">liveblogged</a> his interviews <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/">twice</a> from All Things D events -- and we're expecting quite the talk tonight following the official unveiling of Ice Cream Sandwich. Join us after the break for the liveblog!<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Liveblog from AsiaD: Andy Rubin, SVP of Mobile at Google</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/">Liveblog from AsiaD: Andy Rubin, SVP of Mobile at Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20085029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/liveblog-from-asiad-andy-rubin-svp-of-mobile-at-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things digital</category><category>AllThingsDigital</category><category>android</category><category>android 4.0</category><category>Android4.0</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>asiad</category><category>asiad 2011</category><category>Asiad2011</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>ice cream sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>ics</category><category>keynote</category><category>live</category><category>liveblog</category><category>senior vice president</category><category>SeniorVicePresident</category><category>tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google outbid itself by 33 percent in Motorola Mobility acquisition, SEC filing reveals]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/googlerola.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div><div> Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/google-acquiring-motorola-mobility/">acquisition</a> of Motorola Mobility is already starting to lose that new car smell, but a fresh batch of financial details has now emerged, providing deeper insight into how the deal actually went down. According to an SEC filing that Motorola Mobility released yesterday, Google made an initial offer of $30 per share on August 1st, but soon raised that bid to $37 per share on August 9th, after Moto and its advisers asked for $43.50. On that same day, Google again raised its offer to $40 per share, even though Motorola wasn't accepting bids from other firms, for fear that a public auction would jeopardize its sale. This 33 percent increase ultimately added some $3 billion to the pot, bringing the final price tag to $12.5 billion. A Mountain View spokeswoman declined to comment on the negotiations, though its aggressive bidding suggests that the search giant desperately wanted the deal to go through. The documents also reveal that patent-related issues were at the forefront of discussions from the very beginning, when Google's Senior Vice President Andy Rubin met with Motorola Mobility CEO Sanjay Jha to talk about their mutual concerns, way back in July. According to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, these talks eventually convinced Jha that his company would be better off under Google's stewardship, amid fears that Moto could get swallowed by the stormy seas of patent litigation -- anxieties that the exec made <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/11/sanjay-jha-hints-at-motorolas-plans-to-collect-patent-royalties/">all too apparent</a> just four days before the merger was announced. You can dig through the full SEC filing at the source link below.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/">Google outbid itself by 33 percent in Motorola Mobility acquisition, SEC filing reveals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20042275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/14/google-outbid-itself-by-33-percent-in-motorola-mobility-acquisit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>auction</category><category>bid</category><category>CEO</category><category>exec</category><category>financial</category><category>google</category><category>handset</category><category>industry</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>merger</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>money</category><category>moto</category><category>motorola</category><category>motorola mobility</category><category>MotorolaMobility</category><category>negotiation</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>OS</category><category>price</category><category>sanjay jha</category><category>SanjayJha</category><category>SEC</category><category>sec filing</category><category>SecFiling</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>smartphone</category><category>software</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/dantemedfieldintel.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Google's Andy Rubin just came up on stage here at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IDF+2011/">IDF</a> keynote, joining Intel CEO Paul Otellini who was holding a bona fide <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a>-powered smartphone running Android 2.3 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Gingerbread/">Gingerbread</a>)! Hard to be sure, but the device looks eerily like the Aava Mobile handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/">we've seen before</a>. The cameo was part of a much larger initiative, which will see Intel working concurrently with Google in order to optimize future processors for use with Android. We were actually tipped off on this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/intel-reveals-january-2012-gingerbread-arrival-for-the-atom-e6xx/">a few days back</a>, but at the time, it was difficult to tell how much of a consumer impact it'd have. Given Andy's showing, though, it's looking better and better in that regard. The most impressive tidbit, however, is the promise that all future Android builds will be "optimized" for Intel's low-power Atom clan. We've compiled a gallery for you below, and hopefully we'll have a hands-on later today.<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/">Intel's Medfield based Android smartphone</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442020"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442019"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442017"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/medfield_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442016"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/img8595_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
	<em>Dante Cesa contributed to this report</em>.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20041705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aava Mobile</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>breaking news</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2011</category><category>Idf2011</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>Paul Ottellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>PaulOttellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriam Joire]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin: over 500,000 Android activations a day, and growing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/"><img alt="Andy Rubin" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/2011-06-28-08h2754.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
You may have noticed that Steve Jobs isn't <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/jobs-suggests-that-competitors-device-activation-tallies-may-be/">nitpicking</a> anymore over how Google measures the number of Android activations. It probably has something to do with the fact that, no matter how you slice it, at this point Android's growth is outpacing that of the iOS. In fact, according to Andy Rubin, 500,000 new Android devices are activated every day, and that number is continuing to grow. Heck, as of December that number was only <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/">300,000</a> -- that's a 60-percent increase in just over seven months. At this rate there will be more Android phones than people in just a few short years. There might not be enough food and potable water to sustain the Earth's ever growing population, but at least everyone will be able to tweet about it.<br />
<br />
[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/">Andy Rubin: over 500,000 Android activations a day, and growing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19978256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/andy-rubin-over-500-000-android-activations-a-day-and-growing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activations</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>growth</category><category>stats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Danger co-founders reunite with Andy Rubin at Google to focus on Android hardware]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/danger-google-05-11-2011.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
In the year 2000, former Apple, WebTV and Philips employees Andy Rubin, Joe Britt, and Matt Hershenson founded a little company called Danger Incorporated, which you may know from such hits as the original <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sidekick,danger">Sidekick</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/microsoft-completes-danger-acquisition-creates-new-premium-mobi/">$500 million sale to Microsoft</a>. One of those three co-founders, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andyrubin">Andy Rubin</a>, has since become a very public face at Google, and it turns out he's recently gotten back together with his former compatriots to do more than just reminisce about the old days. As <em>Fortune</em> reports, both Britt and Hershenson quietly joined Google "within the last twelve months" to run a new Android Hardware wing of the company. So far, much of their work has apparently focused on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-announces-android-open-accessory-standard-arduino-based/">accessories</a> and, while there's reportedly no plans for any actual Google-branded accessories anytime soon, Britt reportedly said that he would like to see the company produce some Android peripherals of its own "in the long term." Of course, Danger also produced its own software back in the day and, as you're probably aware, the key architect of it, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/matiasduarte">Matias Duarte</a>, is now at Google as well.<br />
<br />
[Image: <a href="http://www.entrepreneurship.org/en/e360tv/entrepreneurial-thought-leader-speaker-series-42.aspx?video=15">Entrepreneurship.org</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/">Danger co-founders reunite with Andy Rubin at Google to focus on Android hardware</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 11 May 2011 20:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19938246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/danger-co-founders-reunite-with-andy-rubin-at-google-to-focus-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>danger</category><category>danger inc</category><category>danger incorporated</category><category>DangerInc</category><category>DangerIncorporated</category><category>google</category><category>joe britt</category><category>JoeBritt</category><category>Matt Hershenson</category><category>MattHershenson</category><category>sidekick</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 20:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google clarifies 18 month Android upgrade program, details far from solidified]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/google-io-2011-press-keynote.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
We're camped out here at Google'e executive Q&amp;A session, and Andy Rubin and co. are spitting out answers to questions from curious minds. While mentioned briefly in the outfit's <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/googleio">keynote earlier</a>, the structured upgrade program is obviously becoming a huge focal point here at the show. One of the major pain points for Android owners in the past (and even now, truthfully) is the inability to know if and when your particular handset will ever get an Android update. Epic 4G owners had a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/sprint-pulls-epic-4g-froyo-update-cites-data-connectivity-and-s/">particularly hard</a> go at it, but most everyone outside of Nexus One users have experienced something similar. Unfortunately, it seems as if our excitement may be a bit premature. While LG, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, AT&amp;T, Vodafone, Sprint, Samsung, HTC and Verizon Wireless are technically onboard, all of this feels like it was decided upon at the 11th hour here in San Francisco. When pressed about how long it'd take updates to flow to phones after given the thumbs-up by Google itself, there's no hard news to report. In fact, the details there are still being hashed out.<br />
<br />
To quote Google, "It's a logistics problem." We can only imagine. Trying to get every Android partner to follow a timeline for releases has to be a complete and utter nightmare, but the company seems certain that these stipulations won't cripple anyone's ability to innovate on their skins (or have too little time to make the needed changes).<br />
<br />
We would've loved to hear a specific figure that we could start holding phone manufacturers to, but alas, it isn't to be. The only hard number thrown out today is 18 months. That's how long future hardware will be in the support cycle (at least, anyway), so you'll "soon" be able to count on your next Android device receiving all applicable updates for 1.5 years after purchase. As for phones that use custom skins, like Blur and Sense? Hard to say if that'll slow things down, and it's even harder to say if outfits like Dell will be joining this party at any time in the future. Though, to be fair, Andy Rubin clarified that there's an "open invitation" for anyone <i>not</i> listed to waltz on in. Naturally, we'll keep you abreast of any further developments from the show floor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/">Google clarifies 18 month Android upgrade program, details far from solidified</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 May 2011 14:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19936765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>carrier</category><category>froyo</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>google io</category><category>google io 2011</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>GoogleIo</category><category>GoogleIo2011</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>ice cream sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>platform</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 14:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Editorial: Android's problem isn't fragmentation, it's contamination]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11x0409mnbvhg.jpg" /></a></div>
This thought was first given voice by Myriam Joire on last night's <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2011/04/10/engadget-mobile-podcast-083-04-09-2011/">Mobile Podcast</a>, and the simple, lethal accuracy of it has haunted me ever since. All the hubbub and unrest about whether Google is trying to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/">lock Android down</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/">not</a> has failed to address whether Google <em>should</em> be trying to control the OS, and if so, what the (valid) reasons for that may be. Herein, I present only one, but it's arguably big enough to make all the dissidence about open source idealism and promises unkept fade into insignificance.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Editorial: Android's problem isn't fragmentation, it's contamination</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/">Editorial: Android's problem isn't fragmentation, it's contamination</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19908096/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/editorial-androids-problem-isnt-fragmentation-its-contamina/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>contamination</category><category>editorial</category><category>fragmentation</category><category>future</category><category>google</category><category>harmonization</category><category>mobile os</category><category>MobileOs</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>os</category><category>smartphones</category><category>standardization</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Android chief Andy Rubin tackles open source qualms, says Honeycomb isn't 'one size fits all']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/3-24-11-honeycomb-easter-egg-600.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Google got a lot of flak for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/google-keeping-honeycomb-source-code-on-ice-says-its-not-ready/">withholding the Android 3.0 source code</a>, and plenty more when<em> Businessweek </em>sources claimed the company had set aside its open stance to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/">dictate from a throne</a>, but today the man who would allegedly sit atop the royal seat says it isn't so. Andy Rubin, the man in charge of Android, says that "there are no lock-downs or restrictions against customizing UIs" nor "any efforts to standardize the platform on any single chipset architecture" as have often <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/honeycomb-will-not-require-dual-core-cpu-as-minimum-hardware-spe/">been rumored</a> before, and that when Honeycomb is finally <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/google-details-some-of-the-honeycomb-features-coming-to-ice-crea/">ready for phones</a>, Google will indeed release its source code. Overall, he claims that Android's position when it comes to open source hasn't changed since day one -- which is nice for those who would like to believe that Google's still sticking to its motto -- but that's not likely to appease companies cut out of the loop simply because they weren't part of the early adopter club. If Google's methods will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/fragmentation">reduce fragmentation</a>, though, who are we to judge?<br />
<br />
[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/">Android chief Andy Rubin tackles open source qualms, says Honeycomb isn't 'one size fits all'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19905423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/android-chief-andy-rubin-tackles-open-source-qualms-head-on-say/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Android 3.0</category><category>Android3.0</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>fragmentation</category><category>Google</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>open handset alliance</category><category>open source</category><category>OpenHandsetAlliance</category><category>OpenSource</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google tightening control of Android, insisting licensees abide by 'non-fragmentation clauses'?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/11x0331n833el.jpg" /></a>A storm seems to be brewing over the realm of Android development. Bloomberg's <em>Businessweek</em> spies have received word from "a dozen executives working at key companies in the Android ecosystem" that Google is actively working to gain control and final say over customizations of its popular mobile OS. That might not sound unreasonable, and indeed Google's public position on the matter is that it's seeking to stabilize the platform and ensure quality control, but it does mark a major shift from where Android started -- an open source OS that was also open to manufacturers and carriers to customize as they wish. Not so anymore, we're told, as apparently Mountain View is now demanding that content partnerships and OS tweaks get the blessing of Andy Rubin before proceeding. The alternative, of course, is to not be inside Google's warm and fuzzy early access program, but then, as evidenced by the company recently <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/google-keeping-honeycomb-source-code-on-ice-says-its-not-ready/">withholding the Honeycomb source code</a>, you end up far behind those among your competitors who do dance to Google's pipe.<br />
<br />
Things have gotten so heated, in fact, that complaints have apparently been made to the US Department of Justice. They may have something to do with allegations of Google <em>holding back</em> Verizon handsets with Microsoft's Bing on board, ostensibly in an effort to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/microsoft-lodges-antitrust-complaint-against-google-with-europea/">trip up</a> its biggest search competitor. Another major dissatisfaction expressed by those working with Android code is that Google needs an advance preview of what is being done in order to give it the green light -- which, as noted by a pair of sources familiar with Facebook's Android customization efforts, isn't sitting well with people at all. Google and Facebook are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/30/google-adding-a-1-button-to-search-results-hopes-you-like-it/">direct competitors</a> in the online space and it's easily apparent how much one stands to gain from knowing the other's plans early. As to the non-fragmentation clauses in licenses, Andy Rubin has pointed out those have been there from the start, but it's only now that Google is really seeking to use them to establish control. The future of Android, therefore, looks to be a little less open and a little more Googlish -- for better or worse. As Nokia's Stephen Elop puts it:<blockquote>
<div>"The premise of a true open software platform may be where Android started, but it's not where Android is going."</div>
</blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/">Google tightening control of Android, insisting licensees abide by 'non-fragmentation clauses'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19898176/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/google-tightening-control-of-android-insisting-licensees-abide/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>closed</category><category>code</category><category>customization</category><category>development</category><category>fragmentation</category><category>freedom</category><category>google</category><category>mobile os</category><category>MobileOs</category><category>non-fragmentation</category><category>open</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>os</category><category>quality control</category><category>QualityControl</category><category>regulation</category><category>rules</category><category>software</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google refocuses under Larry Page; Eric Schmidt says Microsoft is bigger competition than Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-restructures-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-sa/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/01-27-11googlceos.jpg" /></a></div>
Now that the dust has settled from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/larry-page-takes-over-as-google-ceo-eric-schmidt-now-executive/">Google CEO shuffle</a> that will see Larry Page take the top spot from Eric Schmidt in April, it's time for the profiles of the company to hit -- and <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek</em> is up first with a piece that examines the company's past and future challenges, as well the key leaders of what it calls "Google 3.0": Vic Gundotra, who's heading up a now-not-so-secret social networking initiative called Google +1, Android chief Andy Rubin, YouTube head Salar Kamangar, advertising lead Susan Wojcicki, Chrome head Sundar Pichai, and search leads Udi Manber and Amit Singhal. It's all very fascinating, and it includes some great anecdotes, like Vic Gundotra and Phil Schiller getting into an argument about user location-tracking so heated that Eric Schmidt and Steve Jobs had to intervene. Yeah, it's like that.<br />
<br />
Speaking of Eric Schmidt, he was in Davos this week, and he had some choice words for reporters on Google's competition -- and it's not Facebook. "Microsoft has more cash, more engineers, more global reach. We see competition from Microsoft every day," says Eric, while Facebook "has clearly stated they don't want to get into the search business. Facebook users tend to use Google search." As for Apple, he gave the usual line about both partnering with and competing with Cupertino, while taking a moment to laud Steve Jobs as "the most successful CEO in the world anywhere," who's built an "elegant, scalable, closed system" while "Google is attempting to do something with a completely different approach." Spoken like a true frenemy, we suppose. Check out the source links to read both pieces.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/">Google refocuses under Larry Page; Eric Schmidt says Microsoft is bigger competition than Facebook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19818503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/google-refocuses-under-larry-page-eric-schmidt-says-microsoft-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amit singhal</category><category>AmitSinghal</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>apple</category><category>ceo</category><category>eric schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>facebook</category><category>google</category><category>larry page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>management</category><category>microsoft</category><category>profile</category><category>salar kamangar</category><category>SalarKamangar</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>Sundar Pichai</category><category>SundarPichai</category><category>susan wojcicki</category><category>SusanWojcicki</category><category>udi manber</category><category>UdiManber</category><category>vic gundotra</category><category>VicGundotra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin's full D: Dive Into Mobile interview video posted]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/dmobileandyrubin0375.jpg" /></a></div>
Android boss <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AndyRubin/">Andy Rubin</a> almost always makes for an entertaining interview, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/">his appearance at <em>AllThingsD</em>'s D: Dive Into Mobile conference</a> in San Francisco last week was certainly no exception. The introduction of <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/gingerbread">Android 2.3 Gingerbread</a> and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NexusS/">Nexus S</a> were the official news items of the day, but Rubin took the opportunity to showcase the next version of the platform -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Honeycomb/">Honeycomb</a> -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/">running on a prototype Motorola tablet</a> that no one had seen before. He also runs through a breakdown of Android's business model (hint: it's profitable), muses about video calling, and gives us a look at that crazy new 3D-capable Google Maps app. Follow the break for the footage.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Andy Rubin's full D: Dive Into Mobile interview video posted</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/">Andy Rubin's full D: Dive Into Mobile interview video posted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19760554/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/andy-rubins-full-d-dive-into-mobile-interview-video-posted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>allthingsd</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>dive into mobile</category><category>DiveIntoMobile</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>motorola</category><category>nexus s</category><category>NexusS</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin: over 300,000 Android phones activated daily]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/10x1209ib243t5rubin.jpg" /></a></div>
Cast your mind back to the ancient time that was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/04/npd-android-is-now-top-selling-os-in-american-smartphones/">this August</a> and you'll recall Eric Schmidt telling you, with no lack of pride, that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/googles-schmidt-boasts-200k-android-devices-sold-daily-waxes-i/">200,000</a> Android phones were being sold each and every day. Skip past Steve Jobs' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/jobs-suggests-that-competitors-device-activation-tallies-may-be/">snide remarks</a> about what's included in that tally, and fast-forward to today, where Andy Rubin is blowing minds with the latest, very nicely rounded, total: 300,000 daily activations. Yes, in spite of being the most <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/07/visualized-the-real-android-fragmentation/">fragmented</a> thing this side of our 10-year old hard drives, the Android OS just keeps growing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/feel-goodroid-nexus-one-is-in-the-black-60k-android-devices-ac/">at an exponential rate</a>. So Steve, any comment on today's data? Were they counting it wrong?<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Dell]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/">Andy Rubin: over 300,000 Android phones activated daily</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19753081/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300-000-android-phones-activated-daily/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activations</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>boast</category><category>data</category><category>growth</category><category>numbers</category><category>quote</category><category>rubin</category><category>statistics</category><category>stats</category><category>tweet</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's big week: Nexus S, Honeycomb tablets, Chrome OS laptops, and eBooks to boot]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/google-big-week-hed-rm-eng-3.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
We gotta hand it to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Google/">Google</a>: if its goal was to own the technology news cycle for 48 hours, mission accomplished. The Mountain View-based company spent the first two days this week laying out pretty much every big announcement it possibly could: a new flagship phone coming next week (the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nexuss">Nexus S</a>), a new Android build (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/gingerbread">2.3 Gingerbread</a>), a preview of the next Android build (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb">Honeycomb</a>) on a never-before-seen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/">Motorola tablet</a>, the debut of its cloud-based laptop platform (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/chromeos">Chrome OS</a>) with hardware, and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/01/google-editions-launching-in-us-before-the-end-of-the-year-goin/">giant plunge</a> into the growing e-book market -- and that isn't everything. We've done our best to condense all the days' highlights into something easier to digest, so read on for a recap on all things Google!<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's big week: Nexus S, Honeycomb tablets, Chrome OS laptops, and eBooks to boot</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/">Google's big week: Nexus S, Honeycomb tablets, Chrome OS laptops, and eBooks to boot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19750506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/googles-big-week-nexus-s-honeycomb-tablets-chrome-os-laptops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.3</category><category>3.0</category><category>5.0</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>android 3</category><category>android 3.0</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Android3</category><category>Android3.0</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>chrome</category><category>chrome book</category><category>chrome os</category><category>ChromeBook</category><category>ChromeOs</category><category>cr 48</category><category>cr-48</category><category>Cr48</category><category>e book</category><category>e books</category><category>e reader</category><category>e readers</category><category>e-book</category><category>e-books</category><category>e-reader</category><category>e-readers</category><category>ebooks</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>google ebooks</category><category>google maps</category><category>google maps 5.0</category><category>google maps for mobile</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>GoogleEbooks</category><category>GoogleMaps</category><category>GoogleMaps5.0</category><category>GoogleMapsForMobile</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>maps</category><category>maps 5.0</category><category>Maps5.0</category><category>motorola</category><category>nexus</category><category>nexus s</category><category>NexusS</category><category>nfc</category><category>samsung</category><category>stingray</category><category>verizon</category><category>video</category><category>vz</category><category>vzw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Android Honeycomb coming 'next year,' adds tablet support]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="live_update"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/divetabletmobl6.jpg" class="live_image" /></div>
Sure, Google might have just dropped Android 2.3 Gingerbread on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nexuss">Nexus S</a> just today, but that's <em>old</em> news -- Andy Rubin just <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/">took the stage</a> at D: Dive Into Mobile and announced that Honeycomb is due "next year" with support for tablets. Andy demoed the new version of the OS on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/">Motorola prototype tablet</a>, and it was very different, and highly customized -- although there were still grids of icons, the apps were more "desktop" in flavor, and the traditional Android buttons weren't present. We're waiting for more details, we'll let you know what's up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/">Android Honeycomb coming 'next year,' adds tablet support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19749158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/android-honeycomb-coming-next-year-adds-tablet-support/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 3.0</category><category>Android3.0</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>google</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>os</category><category>tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola Android tablet prototype makes a cameo at D: Dive Into Mobile running Honeycomb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/dmobileandyrubin0435.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Google's Andy Rubin brought more than just a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NexusS/">Nexus S</a> in his bag of goodies tonight. On stage at D: Dive Into Mobile, the man has brought with him a prototype Android tablet from Motorola. It's got video chat, an NVIDIA processor, a "dual core 3D processor," and... oh yeah, it runs <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Honeycomb/">Honeycomb</a>, not Gingerbread. Little else is known -- Rubin immediately turned his attention to a new release of Google Maps -- but we wouldn't be surprised if we were looking at <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/motorola,stingray">Stingray</a>, a tablet rumored for a launch on Verizon shortly. Is it seven inches? Ten? We honestly don't know -- but our gut tells us on the bigger side of the spectrum, which would line up with rumblings that the Stingray would in fact be a full ten inches diagonally. Feast your eyes on our pics below!<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/">Motorola Android tablet prototype makes a cameo at D: Dive Into Mobile</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/#3643376"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/mototabproto23_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/#3643377"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/mototabproto22_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/#3643378"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/mototabproto21_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/#3643379"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/mototabproto20_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into-mobile/#3643380"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/mototabproto19_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<strong>Updated</strong>: Video after the break!<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motorola Android tablet prototype makes a cameo at D: Dive Into Mobile running Honeycomb</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/">Motorola Android tablet prototype makes a cameo at D: Dive Into Mobile running Honeycomb</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19749148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/motorola-android-tablet-prototype-makes-a-cameo-at-d-dive-into/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10</category><category>10 inch</category><category>10Inch</category><category>7</category><category>7 inch</category><category>7Inch</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>dive into mobile</category><category>DiveIntoMobile</category><category>google</category><category>google honey comb</category><category>GoogleHoneyComb</category><category>honey comb</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>motorola</category><category>stingray</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Andy Rubin live from D: Dive Into Mobile]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/dmobileandyrubin0375.jpg" /></a></div>
Stay tuned... there's some serious Nexus S / Android action about to occur.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's Andy Rubin live from D: Dive Into Mobile</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/">Google's Andy Rubin live from D: Dive Into Mobile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19749046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/googles-andy-rubin-live-from-d-dive-into-mobile/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>android 2.3 gingerbread</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Android2.3Gingerbread</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>d: dive into mobile</category><category>D:DiveIntoMobile</category><category>dive into mobile</category><category>DiveIntoMobile</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>liveblog</category><category>nexus</category><category>nexus s</category><category>NexusS</category><category>samsung nexus s</category><category>SamsungNexusS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NFC certification program announced just in time for Android 2.3 Gingerbread launch on Monday?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/nfc-n-mark-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a>Call it coincidence if you want, but a December 7th press conference to launch the NFC Forum's new Certification Program likely has something to do with NFC read / write support built into Google's new Android 2.3 "Gingerbread." An OS that could be officially unveiled as early as today according to a cheeky blog post by Notion Ink that includes this bullet:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>"6th December is another big day for Android and you will find out how fast Notion Ink can work. (Eden is extremely compatible with 2.3)."</div>
</blockquote>Recall how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/16/nexus-s-teaser-by-eric-schmidt-now-available-on-video/">gung-ho Eric Schmidt was</a> on the topic of Near Field Communication while demonstrating it using a <em>still unannounced</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nexus%20s">Nexus S</a> with an embedded NFC chip at the Web 2.0 Summit. That was way back on November 16th when Schmidt promised a Gingerbread release "in like the next few weeks." According to the NFC Forum, a device must be certified in order to display the official "N-Mark" (pictured) -- a symbol for NFC that tells you where to touch in order to initiate NFC services on your device. So, Google... anything you'd like to announce before Tuesday?<br />
<br />
P.S. Almost forgot that Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andy%20rubin">Andy Rubin</a> will be kicking off the <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20101122/googles-android-kingpin-andy-rubin-will-open-d-dive-into-mobile-plus-one-more-surprise/?mod=ATD_rss">D: Dive into Mobile event</a> later today. We'll be there live just in case Andy feels like introducing something pungent and tasty during the opening session scheduled for 6:30pm San Francisco time.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NFC certification program announced just in time for Android 2.3 Gingerbread launch on Monday?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/">NFC certification program announced just in time for Android 2.3 Gingerbread launch on Monday?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19747444/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/nfc-certification-program-announced-just-in-time-for-android-2-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>certification</category><category>d: dive into mobile</category><category>D:DiveIntoMobile</category><category>eden</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>nexus s</category><category>NexusS</category><category>nfc</category><category>nfc certification</category><category>nfc forum</category><category>NfcCertification</category><category>NfcForum</category><category>notion ink</category><category>NotionInk</category><category>release</category><category>rumor</category><category>samsung</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google exec calls Android acquisition its 'best deal ever']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/android-bestdealever-10-27-2010.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
It's easy to forget at this point, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/product/android">Android</a> wasn't a Google creation. Google bought the company in 2005 for an undisclosed sum (estimated to be around $50 million) and, well, let's just say things worked out pretty well for them. How well? Google's vice president of corporate development, David Lawee, told attendees at the Stanford Accel Symposium this week that the acquisition was quite simply Google's "best deal ever." Lawee further went on to note that he did have some initial skepticism about the deal, and recalls saying "I hope this guy does something" after seeing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andyrubin">Andy Rubin</a> around the building for two years. The fact that Rubin actually stayed after the acquisition eventually did inspire some confidence, however, with Lawee adding that it's obvious when a deal doesn't work out "because the people leave."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/">Google exec calls Android acquisition its 'best deal ever'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19692521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/27/google-exec-calls-android-acquistion-its-best-deal-ever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>best deal ever</category><category>BestDealEver</category><category>David Lawee</category><category>DavidLawee</category><category>google</category><category>rubin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin responds to Steve Jobs with a coded tweet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/andy-rubin-arubin-on-twitter.jpg" /></a></div>
It's common knowledge that the first words uttered by any nerd are "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hello%20world">hello world</a>." That is, unless some CEO starts <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/18/steve-jobs-drops-knowledge-on-earnings-call-calls-out-google-an/">bad-mouthing</a> your open-source motivations. Google's Andy Rubin -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/18/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-demos-apps/">father of Android</a>, as it were -- just uttered his first words on Twitter with the tweet you see above. From the looks of it, Andy (assuming this is him, the account is not "verified") is demonstrating how easy it is for anyone to download and compile the latest build of Android. Presumably Jobs will now join Twitter with a response like, "The definition of closed: shut up."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/">Andy Rubin responds to Steve Jobs with a coded tweet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19679603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/andy-rubin-responds-to-steve-jobs-with-a-tweet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>apple</category><category>closed</category><category>fragmented</category><category>google</category><category>inegrated</category><category>ios</category><category>open</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Andy Rubin on Windows Phone 7: 'the world doesn't need another platform']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/andy-rubin-talking.jpg"  alt="" /><br />
</a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/">Shootin' straight,</a> are we Andy? For those unaware, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/">Andy Rubin</a> is the vice president of engineering at Google, and he's had his fingers in Android before the mobile OS was taken mainstream by El Goog. He recently sat down to talk mobile with <i>PCMag</i>, and he left the world with a wealth of quotes to ponder. For starters, he practically calls out OEMs who aren't keeping up with Android's releases, noting that "there's no advantage to the OEM of using an older version, and I'd say there's a consumer disadvantage." Clearly, he's not a fan of all of this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/">fragmentation</a>, either. Moving onto Windows Phone 7, he <i>really</i> came out swinging. When asked what he thought about WP7 as a competitor, here's what came flowing out: <br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>"I think the screen shots I've seen are interesting, but look, the world doesn't need another platform. Android is free and open; I think the only reason you create another platform is for political reasons." </em></div>
</blockquote>We'll obviously need to wait for Windows Phone 7 to launch (and see a few quarters of sales numbers) to see if he's just blowing hot air, but it's interesting fodder at least. Hit the source link for much, much more where this came from -- and keep it sensible in comments, okay? It's just code, after all.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/">Google's Andy Rubin on Windows Phone 7: 'the world doesn't need another platform'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19667283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/googles-andy-rubin-on-windows-phone-7-the-world-doesnt-need/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>Google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Eric Schmidt says Android is profitable, could eventually be a $10 billion business]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/4-20-10-schmidt600.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">It may not exactly be a huge surprise given the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/android-is-numero-uno-among-us-phone-buyers-over-the-last-six-mo/">recent market share numbers</a>, but Google CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ericschmidt">Eric Schmidt</a> has recently confirmed that Android is, in fact, profitable for the company. Of course, it doesn't make all that money from Android directly, but Schmidt says that Android-based phones are already generating enough advertising revenue to cover the cost of development. What's more, while he doesn't provide any current specific numbers, Schmidt did say that he expects there to someday be one billion Android phones in the world, and that if each one generated just $10 per user per year it would be a $10 billion business -- or, as <em>Newsweek</em> notes, about half of Google's total revenue for this year. That's just a tidbit from the full <em>Newsweek</em> piece, though -- hit up the source link below to read the whole thing, which also includes a bit of perspective from Google's Andy Rubin.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/">Google's Eric Schmidt says Android is profitable, could eventually be a $10 billion business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19661834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/googles-eric-schmidt-says-android-is-profitable-could-eventual/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>eric schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>google</category><category>rubin</category><category>schmidt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Skyhook: Google forced Motorola to drop our location service, delay the Droid X]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/2010-09-17droidx.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></div>
We figured Skyhook's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/16/skyhook-sues-google-for-business-interference-and-patent-infring/">business interference and patent infringement lawsuits</a> against Google would turn up some dirt, and we didn't have long to wait: the location-services company's complaint flatly alleges that Google's Andy Rubin ordered Motorola's Sanjay Jha to "stop ship" on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/droidx">Droid X</a> because it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/26/motorola-gives-google-the-boot-turns-to-skyhook-for-location-se/">used Skyhook's XPS positioning system</a> instead of Google Location Services, a tiff that ultimately delayed the phone's release while Moto reworked the software and dropped Skyhook entirely. Following that, Skyhook claims that Google then went after an unidentified "Company X" (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/skyhook-hones-in-on-another-partner-samsungs-wave-to-geo-locat/">likely Samsung</a>) and forced it to drop XPS as well -- which would certainly explain why Samsung's Galaxy S phones <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/samsung-galaxy-s-gps-gate-two-problems-not-one-and-what-to-do/">have WiFi positioning turned off</a> by default, unlike every other Android phone. Ouch.<br />
<br />
If you're thinking that makes no sense because Android is "open," well, you might have another think coming -- Skyhook claims that Google's decisions to allow access to Android Market and its branded apps are an entirely subjective ruse based on something called the Compliance Definition Document, which can be "arbitrarily" interpreted any way Google wants with no recourse. Skyhook says that Google has now told Android OEMs that they're required to use Google Location Services, preventing Skyhook from fulfilling its contracts and costing the company millions in expected royalties.<br />
<br />
Now, this is Skyhook's side of the story and we're sure Google will make a persuasive argument of its own, but let's just back up for a moment here and point out the obvious: Google's never, <i>ever</i> come out and clearly said what's required for devices to gain access to Android Market and the branded apps like Gmail -- even though we've been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">directly asking</a> about those requirements since Android first launched. Remember when Andy Rubin told us that there would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">full-fledged "Google Experience" phones</a> with no carrier or handset manufacturer limitations? Or when we were told that phones <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/25/htcs-sense-ui-not-coming-to-any-google-branded-phones/">with skins like HTC Sense</a> or additional features <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/15/exchange-enabled-htc-magic-explained-its-not-a-with-google-p/">like Exchange integration</a> wouldn't have Google branding? And then all of that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/07/google-were-cool-with-exchange-on-google-branded-android-phone/">turned out to be a lie</a>? Yes, Android might be "open" in the sense that the source code is available, but there's no doubt Google's wielded incredible power over the platform by restricting access to Market and its own apps -- power that hasn't been used to prevent carrier-mandated bloatware or poorly-done manufacturer skinning, but has instead apparently been used to block legitimate competitors like Skyhook from doing business. We're dying to hear Google's side of this story and fill in some of the gaps -- and you can bet we're digging as hard as we can for more info. Stay tuned, kids.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/">Skyhook: Google forced Motorola to drop our location service, delay the Droid X</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19638611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/17/skyhook-google-forced-motorola-to-drop-our-location-service-de/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>compliance definition document</category><category>ComplianceDefinitionDocument</category><category>droid x</category><category>DroidX</category><category>google</category><category>google location service</category><category>GoogleLocationService</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>Location services</category><category>LocationServices</category><category>motorola</category><category>samsung</category><category>sanjay jha</category><category>SanjayJha</category><category>skyhook</category><category>skyhook xps</category><category>SkyhookXps</category><category>stop ship</category><category>StopShip</category><category>with google</category><category>WithGoogle</category><category>xps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: Android fragmentation 'is a boogeyman, a red herring']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/android-somersaults-rm-eng.jpg" /></a></div>
Google's Dan Morrill, open source and compatibility program manager in the Android team, just penned a lengthy diatribe against the very concept of <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/fragmentation,android">fragmentation</a> on the official Android Developers Blog, basically saying it doesn't exist. Actually, the language is a little more colorful:<blockquote>
<div>"Because it means everything, it actually means nothing, so the term is useless. Stories on 'fragmentation' are dramatic and they drive traffic to pundits' blogs, but they have little to do with reality. 'Fragmentation' is a bogeyman, a red herring, a story you tell to frighten junior developers. Yawn."</div>
</blockquote>Sure, as Android goes, the term "fragmentation" has meant moderately different things in different contexts over the past couple years -- fair enough. But the fact remains that releasing six major revisions of any platform within the span of 19 months (four of which are in heavy user circulation) is unprecedented and potentially unsettling to manufacturers and consumers alike. Your average Joe isn't going to understand why, for example, his <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/htc,hero">HTC Hero</a> that he bought a few months back can't use the Buzz widget or some of the cooler features in Google Maps, and Google hasn't done a very good job of explaining or justifying it, other than by blocking incompatible apps and updates from being visible in the Market.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google: Android fragmentation 'is a boogeyman, a red herring'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/">Google: Android fragmentation 'is a boogeyman, a red herring'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19499259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/google-fragmentation-is-a-boogeyman-a-red-herring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>dan morrill</category><category>DanMorrill</category><category>editorial</category><category>fragmentation</category><category>google</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entelligence: Hello WebTV part II]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<strong><span style="font-style: italic;">Entelligence</span></strong><span style="font-style: italic;"> is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/google-io-2010-2-0812-rm-eng.jpg" /></a></div>
In a world of connected screens it's sometimes hard to classify what's what. I mean, what's a PC? We call smartphones "phones," but the reality is they're tiny PCs that go in our pocket. Similarly, the TV has undergone an evolution as well, and now Google is attempting to bring the PC and TV even closer together with the introduction of Google TV. What is it? Well there are three core elements: Android 2.2, the Chrome browser and the Android app marketplace. It's ambitious, but I'm skeptical. I feel like I've heard a lot of this before -- and in fact, I have. By no small coincidence, Android is headed by Andy Rubin, the man who was in charge of a product called WebTV before it was sold to Microsoft. And just as with WebTV, there's a lot of potential in the ideas behind GoogleTV, but I'm not sure Google has nailed it.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entelligence: Hello WebTV part II</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/">Entelligence: Hello WebTV part II</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 30 May 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19496626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/entelligence-hello-webtv-part-ii/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>column</category><category>columns</category><category>entelligence</category><category>google</category><category>google tv</category><category>GoogleTv</category><category>set-top box</category><category>Set-topBox</category><category>tv</category><category>web tv</category><category>WebTv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gartenberg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entelligence: Is Android fragmented or is this the new rate of innovation?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<strong><span style="font-style: italic;">Entelligence</span></strong><span style="font-style: italic;"> is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/htcdesiretriohed03302010.jpg" /></a></div>
A few weeks ago I sat down with the father of Android, Andy Rubin. Andy's a super smart person, having done stints at Apple, General Magic, WebTV and Danger before starting the Android project. We talked about a lot of things, and we particularly spent time discussing Android fragmentation. I've written in the past about my concern that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/entelligence-a-google-phone-could-be-the-death-of-android/">Android platform is fragmenting</a> much like desktop Linux has over the years, and the potential for the platform to turn into a patchwork of devices and vendor specific modifications that bear little relationship with each other. I've spent a lot of time thinking about my conversation with Andy, and I've rewritten this column more than a few times as a result.<br />
<br />
Today, there are at least five different versions of Android on the market. Many of them are highly customized to allow for new features and device differentiation, but that same customization also makes it harder for vendors to update them to the latest versions. New releases and versions of Android are often outdated by newer versions in the span of just a few weeks. For example, the Nexus One when released was capable of running apps like Google Earth that devices such as the Droid could not, because it ran Android 2.0, not 2.1.Tablet vendors complain their Android offerings lack features such as Android Market because Google forbids them to install the marketplace app, forcing them to create proprietary alternatives. It would appear Android is indeed fragmenting -- but perhaps there are other forces at work. <br />
<br />
When I spoke with Andy, he pointed out there are several classical symptoms of platform fragmentation. First, older APIs no longer work and break in new releases. Second, multiple application marketplaces offer different applications that lack uniformity across platforms. Both of these are true when you look at desktop Linux. Neither are true of Android.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entelligence: Is Android fragmented or is this the new rate of innovation?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/">Entelligence: Is Android fragmented or is this the new rate of innovation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 22 May 2010 20:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19487458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/22/entelligence-is-android-fragmented-or-is-this-the-new-rate-of-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android fragmentation</category><category>AndroidFragmentation</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>column</category><category>entelligence</category><category>fragmentation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gartenberg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 20:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Andy Rubin talks Android and Apple, promises Flash support in Froyo]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-on-everything-android/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/ces20100207.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Gather 'round, Android fans, because Google's Android boss <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AndyRubin/">Andy Rubin</a> has done a wide-ranging interview with <em>The New York Times</em>, and we're guessing you're going to want to hear what he has to say. The biggest news to come out of it is word that Android 2.2, a.k.a. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/froyo">Froyo</a>, will come complete with full support for Flash, which is far and away the most official confirmation we've had to date, and slightly contradicts earlier talk that Flash support wouldn't necessarily be built into the OS. Why the change? Rubin says that sometimes being open "means not being militant about the things consumers are actually enjoying." On a similar note, Rubin also said that while he doesn't know when the number of Android phones sold would exceed the number of iPhones and BlackBerrys sold, he's "confident it will happen," adding that "open usually wins." And the hits just keep on coming from there, with Rubin not so subtly working in a mention of North Korea after a discussion about Apple and closed computing platforms, before closing things out with the line: "with openness comes less secrets." Hit up the source link below for the complete interview, in which Rubin also address the issue of Android fragmentation, and reveals that he does indeed own an iPad, but naturally has a few things to say about it.</div>
<div> </div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/">Google's Andy Rubin talks Android and Apple, promises Flash support in Froyo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19456316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-talks-android-and-apple-promises-flash-support/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.2</category><category>Android2.2</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>apple</category><category>flash</category><category>froyo</category><category>google</category><category>open</category><category>openness</category><category>rubin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andy Rubin on multitouch in Android: 'I personally don't like two-handed operations']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/mossberg-rubin-fireball.jpg" alt="" /></div>
In a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/">very special CES edition of All Things D</a> today, our own Joshua Topolsky had an opportunity to directly confront Google's Andy Rubin on the nagging multitouch issue -- not necessarily multitouch itself, but the growing disparity in support between American and European devices (the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Droid/">Droid</a> / <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Milestone/">Milestone</a> being the most famous example):<blockquote>
<div>"You call this a superphone -- 3.7-inch capacitive display, but no keyboard and no multitouch. Yet it has multitouch outside the US. Why not America?"</div>
</blockquote>Andy's reply:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>"It's not an America versus outside America kind of thing. It's a decision that is a result of the OEM model. I personally don't like two-handed operations... there is no conspiracy."</div>
</blockquote>That doesn't explain the fact that the European Nexus One seems to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/surprise-surprise-htcs-euro-spec-nexus-one-does-multitouch/">have some in-built multitouch enabled</a> -- nor does it explain why any manufacturer would ever opt to exclude it under any circumstances unless there's some outside pressure involved. Surely Rubin's personal preferences don't play into this... right? <em>Right</em>, Google?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/">Andy Rubin on multitouch in Android: 'I personally don't like two-handed operations'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19309844/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2010</category><category>Ces2010</category><category>mossberg</category><category>multi touch</category><category>multi-touch</category><category>MultiTouch</category><category>nexus one</category><category>NexusOne</category><category>rubin</category><category>walt mossberg</category><category>WaltMossberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Live from All Things D at CES 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="live_update">
<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/ces20100087-1262993726.jpg" alt="" /></div>
We're live at the All Things D event at CES 2010. We're slated to see conversations with Jon Rubinstein, Reed Hastings, and Andy Rubin, so stay tuned -- we start at 3:30PM PT!</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Live from All Things D at CES 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/">Live from All Things D at CES 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19309740/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/live-from-all-things-d-at-ces-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2010</category><category>Ces2010</category><category>Jon Rubinstein</category><category>JonRubinstein</category><category>kara swisher</category><category>KaraSwisher</category><category>liveblog</category><category>reed hastings</category><category>ReedHastings</category><category>walt mossberg</category><category>WaltMossberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google refutes USA Today report on blocked Skype application]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/08/android-and-voip-applications.html"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/gel-googleandroid-01k-1.png" /></a></div>
While Apple was busy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/">batting away the FCC</a> with its litany of reasons why its app approval process is totally hunky-dory, Google was apparently having it's own VoIP-related firefight. It seems that an article in the <em>USA Today</em> which hit newsstands this morning alleges that the internet giant sought to block (dare we say reject) a full Skype application from making its way into the Android Market. The story claims that the application was neutered to become "a watered-down version of the original that routes calls over traditional phone networks" -- which would obviously cast a decidedly malevolent slant to the benevolent company's policies.<br />
<div><br />
The story is surely fine fodder for a FUD enthusiast up to that point, but it appears (gasp) that <em>USA Today</em> may have gotten one minor fact wrong. Namely, that Google had any unsavory aim to clip the wings of the Skype app. According to company man Andy Rubin (on Google's <em>Public Policy Blog</em>), the "lite" moniker was only attached due to technical limitations of the Android platform. In his words:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Here are the facts, clear and simple: While the first generation of our Android software did not support full-featured VoIP applications due to technology limitations, we have worked through those limitations in subsequent versions of Android, and developers are now able to build and upload VoIP services.</div>
<div> </div>
<br />
<div>As we told USA Today earlier in the week Google did not reject an application from Skype or from any other company that provides VoIP services. To suggest otherwise is false. At this point no software developer -- including Skype -- has implemented a complete VoIP application for Android. But we're excited to see -- and use -- these applications when they're submitted, because they often provide more choice and options for users. We also look forward to the day when consumers can access any application, including VoIP apps, from any device, on any network.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Note the jab there at the end? Okay, swell. Of course, even if Google had rejected the app outright, users still could have installed the software through other avenues, as the Android Market is only a suggestion -- not a mandate -- for how consumers should acquire apps on Google's platform.</div>
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/21/google-we-never-blocked-skype-from-android/">TechCrunch</a>; Image courtesy <a href="http://hello.eboy.com/eboy/">eBoy</a>]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-08-20-google-internet-calls-apple_N.htm">Read</a> - Google-AT&amp;T-Apple fight over Net calls draws FCC interest<br />
<a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/08/android-and-voip-applications.html">Read</a> - Android and VoIP applications<br type="_moz" /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/">Google refutes USA Today report on blocked Skype application</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19137106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android market</category><category>AndroidMarket</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>app store</category><category>AppStore</category><category>controversy</category><category>google</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>skype</category><category>voice over ip</category><category>VoiceOverIp</category><category>voip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google refutes USA Today report on blocked Skype application]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/08/android-and-voip-applications.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/gel-googleandroid-01k-1.png" /></a></div>
While Apple was busy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/">batting away the FCC</a> with its litany of reasons why its app approval process is totally hunky-dory, Google was apparently having its own VoIP-related firefight. It seems that an article in the <em>USA Today</em> which hit newsstands this morning alleges that the internet giant sought to block (dare we say reject) a full Skype application from making its way into the Android Market. The story claims that the application was neutered to become "a watered-down version of the original that routes calls over traditional phone networks" -- which would obviously cast a decidedly malevolent slant to the benevolent company's policies.<br />
<div><br />
The story is surely fine fodder for a FUD enthusiast up to that point, but it appears (gasp) that <em>USA Today</em> may have gotten one minor fact wrong. Namely, that Google had any unsavory aim to clip the wings of the Skype app. According to company man Andy Rubin (on Google's <em>Public Policy Blog</em>), the "lite" moniker was only attached due to technical limitations of the Android platform. In his words:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Here are the facts, clear and simple: While the first generation of our Android software did not support full-featured VoIP applications due to technology limitations, we have worked through those limitations in subsequent versions of Android, and developers are now able to build and upload VoIP services.</div>
<div> </div>
<br />
<div>As we told USA Today earlier in the week Google did not reject an application from Skype or from any other company that provides VoIP services. To suggest otherwise is false. At this point no software developer -- including Skype -- has implemented a complete VoIP application for Android. But we're excited to see -- and use -- these applications when they're submitted, because they often provide more choice and options for users. We also look forward to the day when consumers can access any application, including VoIP apps, from any device, on any network.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Note the jab there at the end? Okay, swell. Of course, even if Google had rejected the app outright, users still could have installed the software through other avenues, as the Android Market is only a suggestion -- not a mandate -- for how consumers should acquire apps on Google's platform.</div>
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/21/google-we-never-blocked-skype-from-android/">TechCrunch</a>; Image courtesy <a href="http://hello.eboy.com/eboy/">eBoy</a>]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-08-20-google-internet-calls-apple_N.htm">Read</a> - Google-AT&amp;T-Apple fight over Net calls draws FCC interest<br />
<a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/08/android-and-voip-applications.html">Read</a> - Android and VoIP applications<br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/">Google refutes USA Today report on blocked Skype application</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19137091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/google-refutes-usa-today-report-on-blocked-skype-application/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android market</category><category>AndroidMarket</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>app store</category><category>AppStore</category><category>controversy</category><category>google</category><category>rumor</category><category>skype</category><category>voice over ip</category><category>VoiceOverIp</category><category>voip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rubin: Android getting more social features; Donut, Eclair, and Flan all in the oven]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/10/android-will-live-on-get-%E2%80%9Csweeter%E2%80%9D-and-more-social/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/flan.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
You don't have to look far past Palm's <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/Synergy/">Synergy tech for </a><a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/webOS/">webOS</a> and smaller-scale operations like <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/INQ/">INQ</a> to understand that social internetworking -- an intelligent aggregation of every corner of your life -- is the wave of the mobile future, and Google's going on record saying that it understands. At a T-Mobile- and Google-sponsored event in San Francisco earlier today, Andy Rubin (you know, <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/andy+rubin/">the Android dude</a>) discussed upcoming releases in Android's pipeline starting with <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/Donut/">Donut</a>, which we've already heard mentioned, but then progressing to "Eclair" and "Flan" without mentioning specific timelines. He didn't bust out any comprehensive roadmaps, but he waxed poetic about some of the social-centric possibilities -- for example, being kept abreast of a contact's Facebook photo and latest update every time they call -- and mentioned that developers will soon have additional options for charging for apps (presently, Google Checkout is the only way to handle it, but carrier billing is coming soon).<br /><br />He also reiterated that the hardware pipeline for Android is staggeringly massive, with <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">15 to 20 phones coming this year alone</a>. One manufacturer actually had the stones to show him <em>eighteen</em> Android-powered devices in a recent meeting -- sounds like a very Samsung-esque thing to do, but whether it's Samsung, HTC, or someone else, we're happy to hear once again that the Magic, Hero, Dream, and Galaxy won't be the only games in town for long.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=4558">Phone Scoop</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/">Rubin: Android getting more social features; Donut, Eclair, and Flan all in the oven</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/10/android-will-live-on-get-%E2%80%9Csweeter%E2%80%9D-and-more-social/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19094883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>donut</category><category>eclair</category><category>flan</category><category>google</category><category>rubin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rubin: Android getting more social features; Donut, Eclair, and Flan all in the oven]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/10/android-will-live-on-get-%E2%80%9Csweeter%E2%80%9D-and-more-social/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/flan.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
You don't have to look far past Palm's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Synergy/">Synergy tech for </a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/webOS/">webOS</a> and smaller-scale operations like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/INQ/">INQ</a> to understand that social internetworking -- an intelligent aggregation of every corner of your life -- is the wave of the mobile future, and Google's going on record saying that it understands. At a T-Mobile- and Google-sponsored event in San Francisco earlier today, Andy Rubin (you know, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andy+rubin/">the Android dude</a>) discussed upcoming releases in Android's pipeline starting with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Donut/">Donut</a>, which we've already heard mentioned, but then progressing to "Eclair" and "Flan" without mentioning specific timelines. He didn't bust out any comprehensive roadmaps, but he waxed poetic about some of the social-centric possibilities -- for example, being kept abreast of a contact's Facebook photo and latest update every time they call -- and mentioned that developers will soon have additional options for charging for apps (presently, Google Checkout is the only way to handle it, but carrier billing is coming soon).<br /><br />He also reiterated that the hardware pipeline for Android is staggeringly massive, with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">15 to 20 phones coming this year alone</a>. One manufacturer actually had the stones to show him <em>eighteen</em> Android-powered devices in a recent meeting -- sounds like a very Samsung-esque thing to do, but whether it's Samsung, HTC, or someone else, we're happy to hear once again that the Magic, Hero, Dream, and Galaxy won't be the only games in town for long.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=4558">Phone Scoop</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/">Rubin: Android getting more social features; Donut, Eclair, and Flan all in the oven</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/10/android-will-live-on-get-%E2%80%9Csweeter%E2%80%9D-and-more-social/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19094875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/rubin-android-getting-more-social-features-donut-eclair-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>donut</category><category>eclair</category><category>flan</category><category>google</category><category>mobile</category><category>rubin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: 18 Android phones coming this year, possibly more]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/google-expect-18-android-phones-by-years-end/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/18-android-phones-coming.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
18 Android phones, possibly 20 on the market <em>this year</em> according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andy%20rubin">Andy Rubin</a>, speaking at Google I/O. Even higher if you count all the rogue, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/15/exchange-enabled-htc-magic-explained-its-not-a-with-google-p/">Google App-free</a> Android deployments that Google's not aware of. Seeing as how we're already nearly half-way through the year with just a pair of Android handsets on the market (the T-Mobile G1, HTC Magic) and just another -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/samsung-i7500-to-be-renamed-galaxy-released-in-france-in-early/">Samsung i7500 Galaxy</a> -- officially in the chute, we're going to see a flood of product before year's end. In fact, Rubin claims the releases will come from 8 or 9 manufacturers with faster adoption seen in Europe as US carriers try to "create highly distinctive versions of the Android phone to give themselves an edge." Sure, <em>edge</em>, if that's what you want to call the US cartel of hoops and handcuffs then go right ahead. Interestingly, Rubin also further clarified <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/15/exchange-enabled-htc-magic-explained-its-not-a-with-google-p/">the three flavors of Android</a> which break down as follows: <br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Google-free:</strong> Free to download version of Android without Google applications like Gmail or Google Calendar. Access to Android applications is at the whimsical fancy of the manufacturer. <br /></li>
    <li><strong>Strings attached</strong>: Same as above but manufacturers sign a distribution agreement with Google and pre-install the Google applications. Of Rubin's possible 20 phones, 12 to 14 fall into this category <br /></li>
    <li><strong>The Google Experience</strong>: Phones featuring the Google logo with all Google apps installed and includes unrestricted access (neither the carrier nor handset maker can block applications they find objectionable) to the Android market. 5 or 6 of the 20, Android phone mentioned by Rubin will deliver the full Google Experience as god and Sergey designed it.<br /></li>
</ul>
Go ahead, blow it out Google, we're ready for it.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">Google: 18 Android phones coming this year, possibly more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 05:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/google-expect-18-android-phones-by-years-end/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19050093/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>google</category><category>mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: 18 Android phones coming this year, possibly more]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/google-expect-18-android-phones-by-years-end/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/18-android-phones-coming.jpg" /></a></div>
18 Android phones, possibly 20 on the market <em>this year</em> according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/andy%20rubin">Andy Rubin</a>, speaking at Google I/O. Even higher if you count all the rogue, <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/15/exchange-enabled-htc-magic-explained-its-not-a-with-google-p/">Google App-free</a> Android deployments that Google's not aware of. Seeing as how we're already nearly half-way through the year with just a pair of Android handsets on the market (the T-Mobile G1, HTC Magic) and just another -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/samsung-i7500-to-be-renamed-galaxy-released-in-france-in-early/">Samsung i7500 Galaxy</a> -- officially in the chute, we're going to see a flood of product before year's end. In fact, Rubin claims the releases will come from 8 or 9 manufacturers with faster adoption seen in Europe as US carriers try to "create highly distinctive versions of the Android phone to give themselves an edge." Sure, <em>edge</em>, if that's what you want to call the US cartel of hoops and handcuffs then go right ahead. Interestingly, Rubin also further clarified <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/15/exchange-enabled-htc-magic-explained-its-not-a-with-google-p/">the three flavors of Android</a> which break down as follows: <br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Google-free:</strong> Free to download version of Android without Google applications like Gmail or Google Calendar. Access to Android applications is at the whimsical fancy of the manufacturer. <br /></li>
    <li><strong>Strings attached</strong>: Same as above but manufacturers sign a distribution agreement with Google and pre-install the Google applications. Of Rubin's possible 20 phones, 12 to 14 fall into this category <br /></li>
    <li><strong>The Google Experience</strong>: Phones featuring the Google logo with all Google apps installed and includes unrestricted access (neither the carrier nor handset maker can block applications they find objectionable) to the Android market. 5 or 6 of the 20, Android phones mentioned by Rubin will deliver the full Google Experience as god and Sergey designed it.<br /></li>
</ul>
Go ahead, blow it out Google, we're ready for it.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/">Google: 18 Android phones coming this year, possibly more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 05:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/google-expect-18-android-phones-by-years-end/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19050081/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/google-at-least-18-android-phones-coming-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>google</category><category>google experience</category><category>GoogleExperience</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Android Market will offer free trials, but not free bandwidth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2008/10/googles_andy_ru.html"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/android-market.jpg" alt="Android Market will offer free trials, but not free bandwidth" /></a><br /></div>
Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>, with its millions of downloads, is clearly a hit with consumers. But with developers? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/">Not so much</a>. Like a dashing hero to a scorned mistress, Google's Andy Rubin is pledging a different, more loving and respectful relationship with those who would fill his company's Android Market with selections -- and his pockets with royalties. He indicates that the Market will enable free downloadable trials, something that Apple is stubbornly refusing to add, and that those downloads would not be subject to any arbitrary bandwidth caps. Meanwhile, T-Mobile at least will be levying a $2/month fee on developers of free apps expected to use more than the (<em>somewhat </em>arbitrary) amount of 15MB of data per user per month, though how they'll be keeping track of that data outside of their own content stack is unclear -- our guess is that they can't.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/t-mobile/" rel="tag">T-Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/">Android Market will offer free trials, but not free bandwidth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2008/10/googles_andy_ru.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1331363/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/02/android-market-will-offer-free-trials-but-not-free-bandwidth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android market</category><category>AndroidMarket</category><category>andy rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>app store</category><category>AppStore</category><category>g1</category><category>google</category><category>mobile</category><category>t mobile</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>tmobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
