<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Orange San Diego: Intel's Medfield phone gets benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/"><img alt="Orange San Diego: Intel's Medfield phone gets benchmarked" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/orange2012-05-31-11.08.18mat600.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px; " /></a></p><p> While we've been pleasantly surprised by some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/">favorable browser scores</a>, we couldn't help sneaking another peek at the phone's (second) launch -- this time right in the center of London. We took the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego/">Orange <strike>Santa Clara</strike> San Diego</a> for a spin on our latest benchmarks. See how Intel's new mobile processor fares against much pricier competition right after the break.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Orange San Diego: Intel's Medfield phone gets benchmarked</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/">Orange San Diego: Intel's Medfield phone gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 31 May 2012 06:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20248317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/orange-san-diego-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>AZ210A</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>france</category><category>Gingerbread</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel atom z2460</category><category>Intel AZ210A</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelAtomZ2460</category><category>IntelAz210a</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Orange</category><category>Orange Santa Clara</category><category>OrangeSantaClara</category><category>San Diego</category><category>SanDiego</category><category>UK</category><category>vellamo</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 06:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Nexus tablet appears in benchmarks, appears to run on quad-core Tegra 3]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/"><img alt="Google Nexus tablet appears in benchmarks, appears to run on quad-core Tegra 3" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nexus-1338363681.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 346px;" /></a></p><p> ASUS's seven-inch MeMo tablet has just ducked under the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/asus-memo-370t-tablet-fcc/">FCC's gates</a>, but some benchmark results for a purported Google and ASUS team-up could tally with the same device. According to the listing, the Google Asus Nexus 7 will arrive with NVIDIA's quad-core Tegra 3 CPU, clocked at 1.3 GHz, while that (presumably) 7-inch screen packs a 768 x 1280 resolution. The hardware specs end there, but thanks to some investigation by <em>Android Police</em> and <em>Rightware</em>, it appears that this mystery tablet is running Android 4.1 -- possibly the version number for Android's next iteration, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/JellyBean/">Jelly Bean</a>. There are several more hints adding credence to these benchmark results, including the fish-based "grouper" codename, which follows the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/18/verizons-remaining-2010-roadmap-to-be-an-android-fest-of-phones/">Stingray moniker</a> that was handed to the Motorola Xoom ahead of its reveal. We're just itching to know whether it'll still manage a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/18/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-quad-core-tegra-3-tablets-will-drop-to/"><input class="orgTextElmClass" title="" type="hidden" value="sub-$300 price-tag" /><input class="convertedTextElmClass" title="$300" type="hidden" value="sub-£192 price-tag" />sub-$300 price-tag</a>.</p><p></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/">Google Nexus tablet appears in benchmarks, appears to run on quad-core Tegra 3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2012 04:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20247393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/google-asus-nexus-tablet-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Android 4.1</category><category>Android4.1</category><category>Asus</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Nexus</category><category>GoogleNexus</category><category>Jelly Bean</category><category>JellyBean</category><category>MemoPad</category><category>Nexus tablet</category><category>NexusTablet</category><category>NVIDIA</category><category>quad-core</category><category>tegra 3</category><category>Tegra3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mystery LG LE970 claims next-gen Adreno graphics, can't quite prove it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/"><img alt="Mystery LG LE970 claims next-gen Adreno graphics, can't quite prove it" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/lg-e9702.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 245px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> Maybe our skeptic's goggles have fogged over with excitement, but there's something mightily interesting about an entry over at <em>GLBenchmark</em>. First off, the model number and listing info vaguely suggest it <em>could be</em> a variant of the LS970 superphone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/11/lg-ls970-superphone/">rumored for Sprint</a>, aka the LG Eclipse, although the ICS build ("geeb_att_us-eng 4.0.4") indicates this 1.5GHz device is one of Ma Bell's. One of the more unusual specs offers some corroboration: the Adreno 320 graphics, which only come in the souped-up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/qualcomm-unleashes-snapdragon-s4-pro/">Pro</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/01/qualcomm-details-snapdragon-s4-soc-win8-notebooks-further/">quad-core</a> variants of Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon S4 chipset. That would make the LE970 a rare breed indeed, but unfortunately that's about all we can learn at this point. The actual benchmark scores tell us nothing about the handset's performance other than that it can max out the Egypt Standard test despite its 1280 x 720 screen -- making it impossible to compare it to regular Snapdraon S4 phones like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/htc-one-x-for-att-review/">HTC One X</a> on AT&amp;T or the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/htc-one-s-review/">HTC One S</a>. Oh well, where are those lens wipes?</p><p> <br /> <strong>Update</strong>: An earlier version of this post confused the benchmark results with the Egypt Offscreen test -- apologies for the error.</p><p> <br /> [Thanks, Ketul]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/">Mystery LG LE970 claims next-gen Adreno graphics, can't quite prove it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 28 May 2012 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20246235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/lg-le970-adreno-320-benchmark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.5ghz</category><category>APQ8064</category><category>benchmark</category><category>glbenchmark</category><category>krait</category><category>lg</category><category>lg eclipse</category><category>lg le970</category><category>lg ls970</category><category>LgEclipse</category><category>LgLe970</category><category>LgLs970</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MSM8960 Pro</category><category>Msm8960Pro</category><category>opengl</category><category>quad-core</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>qualcomm snapdragon s4</category><category>QualcommSnapdragonS4</category><category>snapdragon s4</category><category>SnapdragonS4</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia Alpha, Phi, PurePhi and PureLambda pop up in tests, bring Windows Phone 8 along for the ride]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nokia-pure-lambda-leak.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 450px;" /></a></p><p> Not long after the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/nokia-lumia-900-review/">Lumia 900</a> surfaced, Nokia's Windows Phone roadmap appeared to have come screeching to a halt -- official and otherwise. However, the first signs of Nokia's second wave may have just surfaced in WP Bench's testing leaderboards. The Nokia Alpha, Phi, PurePhi and PureLambda have all shown up at varying points in the chart; we've seen them for ourselves, although you'll need WP Bench on a Windows Phone to see them first-hand. Not much is visible without seeing the devices themselves, but the PureLambda appears to be running a build of OS 8.0 -- better known to most as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/windows-phone-8-detailed/">Apollo</a>, or possibly Windows Phone 8. As long as these aren't elaborate pranks, they could represent entry, mid-tier and high-end phones; we're wondering if the Pure tag isn't a reference to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/nokia-pureview-windows-phone-confirmed/">PureView-equipped Lumias</a> Nokia said were inevitable in the long run. No matter what the four phones turn out to be, any real devices will show us what Nokia can do with Microsoft's OS now that it's had time to strategize.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/">Nokia Alpha, Phi, PurePhi and PureLambda pop up in tests, bring Windows Phone 8 along for the ride</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 May 2012 03:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/nokia-alpha-phi-purephi-and-purelambda-pop-up-in-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alpha</category><category>apollo</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>lumia</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft windows phone</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsPhone</category><category>nokia</category><category>nokia lumia</category><category>nokia pureview</category><category>NokiaLumia</category><category>NokiaPureview</category><category>phi</category><category>purelambda</category><category>purephi</category><category>pureview</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>windows phone</category><category>windows phone 8</category><category>windows phone 8.0</category><category>windows phone apollo</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone8</category><category>WindowsPhone8.0</category><category>WindowsPhoneApollo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mystery Samsung phone with Snapdragon S4 pops up in benchmarks, may or may not be Verizon's Galaxy S III]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/samsung-sch-i535-verizon-nenamark-benchmark.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 456px;" /></a></p><p> While pre-release benchmarks have a very <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/">hit or miss record</a> for clues as to what future devices will bring, they almost always <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/">raise eyebrows</a>. Nowhere is that more true than in a round of NenaMark2 testing uncovered this weekend: a previously unknown Samsung SCH-i535 for Verizon has tipped up sporting a 1.5GHz, dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SnapdragonS4/">Snapdragon S4</a> instead of one of Samsung's own chips, like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/">Exynos 4 Quad</a>. Given that the SCH-i515 is the model badge for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/16/verizon-galaxy-nexus-review/">Verizon's Galaxy Nexus</a>, it's not a great leap in logic to speculate that this is a custom version of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview-hands-on/">Galaxy S III</a>. It's entirely possible that something else might fit the bill, but knowing that Samsung has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/t-mobile-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-review/">used Snapdragons itself</a> to include 4G before and that HTC just recently <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/htc-one-x-for-att-review/">switched up the One X</a> with an S4 to give it LTE on North American networks, we may be looking at the compromise Samsung needs to make to get its 4.8-inch gigantophone on Big Red.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/">Mystery Samsung phone with Snapdragon S4 pops up in benchmarks, may or may not be Verizon's Galaxy S III</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 06:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20238025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/mystery-samsung-phone-with-snapdragon-s4-pops-up-in-tests/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>dual-core</category><category>exynos</category><category>exynos 4 quad</category><category>exynos 4412</category><category>Exynos4412</category><category>Exynos4Quad</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>krait</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Nenamark2</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>qualcomm snapdragon</category><category>qualcomm snapdragon s4</category><category>QualcommSnapdragon</category><category>QualcommSnapdragonS4</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s 3</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>SamsungGalaxyS3</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>sch-i535</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>snapdragon</category><category>Snapdragon S4</category><category>SnapdragonS4</category><category>Verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S III battery tested by GSMArena, lasts as long as your tablet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-galaxy-nexus-jon.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> Samsung made much ado over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview-hands-on/">Galaxy S III's</a> 2,100mAh battery, but we've been wondering whether or not that power pack was a major perk or just a necessity to offset that hefty <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/">Exynos 4 Quad</a>. One of what looks to be a growing number of escaped pre-release devices was put through the ringer in battery tests and came out looking spic-and-span: it lasted for just over 10 hours for video and voice, or long enough to make even a tablet like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-ipad-review-2012/">new iPad</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-review/">Transformer Prime</a> break a sweat. Web browsing wasn't quite so hot, though, which at a bit over five hours was well behind the seven hours of an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/14/iphone-4s-review/">iPhone 4S</a>. Don't expect the seemingly infinite battery of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/motorola-droid-razr-maxx-review/">Droid RAZR Maxx</a>, and don't be surprised if final devices handle differently, but those with the international Galaxy S III should make it through at least a few interminable meetings watching their favorite reruns... not that we'd condone such a thing.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/">Samsung Galaxy S III battery tested by GSMArena, lasts as long as your tablet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 May 2012 09:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>Android 4.0</category><category>android 4.0 ice cream sandwich</category><category>Android4.0</category><category>Android4.0IceCreamSandwich</category><category>battery</category><category>battery life</category><category>BatteryLife</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>exynos</category><category>exynos 4 quad</category><category>exynos 4412</category><category>Exynos4412</category><category>Exynos4Quad</category><category>galaxy</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>Ice Cream Sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s 3</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>SamsungGalaxyS3</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro and iMac with next-gen Ivy Bridge processors crop up on benchmarks (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="Image" height="451" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/5-14-2012mbpmockup.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></p><p> Yup, Apples are bound to flow beneath the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/23/intel-ivy-bridge-core-i5-i7-quad-core-processors/">Ivy Bridge</a> at some point, but how much of a performance boost will they deliver? If you're happy to hold onto a little skepticism, then two unexpected appearances on the <em>Geekbench</em> site could offer some early answers. The first purports to be an unknown 'MacBookPro9,1' laptop powered by an Ivy Bridge Core i7-3820QM running at 2.7GHz, which achieved a benchmark of 12252 -- that's around 17 percent better than a current equivalent Core i7 15-inch or 17-inch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/macbook-pro-review-early-2011/">MacBook Pro</a>. The second benchmark comes from an 'iMac13,2' running off Intel's next-gen Core i7-3770 desktop chip clocked at 3.4GHz, which only merits a score of 12183 because it's hobbled by 4GB of RAM. If you exclude memory and compare only the CPU integer and floating point scores, then you're looking at a roughly nine percent gain over a current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/09/apple-imac-spring-2011-review/">27-inch iMac</a> with a 3.4Ghz Core i7-2600 processor. Now, these benchmarks could be faked, or represent non-final hardware, but the motherboard codes look valid (see the source links) and they generally tally with what we've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/">come to expect</a> from Ivy Bridge: a healthy oar-stroke forwards, but nothing that would frighten the fish.</p><p> <strong>Update</strong>: <em>9to5Mac</em> has done some digging and come up with a few more interesting tidbits about the upcoming MacBook Pro refresh. For one, code pulled from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mountainlion">Mountain Lion</a> beta appears to indicate that the Ivy Bridge machines will boast USB 3.0 and a new GPU in the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M. The site also claims that the laptops will be slimmer than the current gen, a rumor that we've been hearing for quite some time now.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/">MacBook Pro and iMac with next-gen Ivy Bridge processors crop up on benchmarks (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 May 2012 08:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/macbook-pro-and-imac-ivy-bridge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple imac</category><category>apple macbook pro</category><category>AppleImac</category><category>AppleMacbookPro</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>desktop</category><category>geekbench</category><category>imac</category><category>intel</category><category>intel ivy bridge</category><category>IntelIvyBridge</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>laptop</category><category>leak</category><category>macbook pro</category><category>MacBook Pro 15</category><category>MacBook Pro 17</category><category>MacbookPro</category><category>MacbookPro15</category><category>MacbookPro17</category><category>mbp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 review round-up: 'just get here if you can']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/"><img alt="NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 review round-up: 'just get here if you can'" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/gtx-670-official2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 359px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> While the world still waits for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/kepler-comes-of-age-nvidia-unveils-geforce-600-series-gpus/">GTX 680</a> to reach Newegg, NVIDIA has pushed ahead with the next card down in its stack: the $399 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-670/">GTX 670</a>. This more affordable option keeps most of the main Kepler credentials intact, but it necessarily makes a few compromises on the computational side, with fewer processing cores (1344 instead of 1536) and texture units (112 instead of 128) as well as slower base clock speed (915MHz instead of 1006MHz). Is that likely to be a problem? Judging from reviewers' responses published today, which cover cards from a range of vendors, probably not. In fact, as <em>TechSpot</em> puts it, "there's very little to critique," because the GTX 670 matches the performance of AMD's flagship <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/amd-radeon-hd-7970-review-roundup-supremely-fast-relatively-ef/">Radeon HD 7970</a> at a much lower price. <em>AnandTech</em>'s benchmarks put the reference board only ten percent (or a handful of fps) behind the GTX 680 in many recent games, leaving it "nipping at the 7970's heels," but it was still plenty powerful enough to play <em>Arkham City</em> or <em>Battlefield 3</em> at 5760 x 1200 with high settings. <em>PCPer</em>'s stats put the new card 15 to 20 percent behind the 680, but found good scaling in SLI mode. <em>The Tech Report</em> found the the GTX 670's cheap stock cooler let it down slightly, with a "friction-filled" idle noise well above the top-end Radeons and even above the dual-GPU <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/nvidia-geforce-gtx-690-review-roundup">GTX 690</a> -- but under load it conducted itself relatively well. We could go on, but ultimately if you're looking to buy this card then you'll want to do your own research at the links below, and then do a raindance.</p><p> <a href="http://www.techspot.com/review/529-geforce-gtx-670/">Read</a> - TechSpot<br /> <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5818/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-feat-evga/1">Read</a> - AnandTech<br /> <a href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/22922/1">Read</a> - The Tech Report<br /> <a href="http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-670-2GB-Graphics-Card-Review-Kepler-399">Read</a> - PC Per<br /> <a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-670-Reviews-EVGA-and-Gigabyte/">Read</a> - HotHardware<br /> <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-670-review,3200.html">Read</a> - Tom's Hardware<br /> <a href="http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/39153-nvidia-geforce-gtx-670/">Read</a> - Hexus</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/">NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 review round-up: 'just get here if you can'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 10 May 2012 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20235410/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-round-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>frame rates</category><category>FrameRates</category><category>gaming</category><category>geforce gtx 670</category><category>GeforceGtx670</category><category>graphics</category><category>graphics card</category><category>GraphicsCard</category><category>gtx 670</category><category>Gtx670</category><category>nvidia</category><category>nvidia geforce gtx 670</category><category>NvidiaGeforceGtx670</category><category>performance</category><category>review</category><category>review round-up</category><category>ReviewRound-up</category><category>reviews</category><category>round-up</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla publishes Model S efficiency and range stats, expects 350 highway miles per charge]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/"><img alt="Image" height="396" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2012teslamodelsstats.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> We've spent our fair share of time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/06/tesla-model-s-test-ride-and-factory-tour-video/">behind the dash</a> of Tesla's gorgeous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ModelS/">Model S</a>, though there hasn't been an opportunity to push the all-electric vehicle to its limits on the <strike>fuel</strike> battery front. The sedan still isn't quite ready for a full-on range test, but the manufacturer has provided a teaser in the form of some updated stats, with a line graph demonstrating consistent improvements over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/01/tesla-roadster-2-5-sport-review/">Roadster</a>. Assuming constant highway travel at speeds of 50-70 miles-per-hour, the Model S is expected to continue rolling for 250-350 miles on a single charge, with the car possibly exceeding 400 miles at slower speeds (think 35 mph and below, but still on the highway). There's an 85 kWh battery on board (compared to 55 kWh on the Roadster), and despite taking a massive hit for size and weight, the Model S only consumes about 10 percent more power than its more-svelte sibling. Those figures apply to the mph listed above, and speed demons can expect to see a massive dive in range. Sounds like we can expect some fiery performance on the road -- just, hopefully not <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/fisker-karma-reportedly-sets-house-on-fire/">in the garage</a> -- when the sedan begins making its way to customers next month, ahead of the original July ship proposal. Hop on past the break and hit up our source link for some nifty graphs, along with Tesla's findings in full.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla publishes Model S efficiency and range stats, expects 350 highway miles per charge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/">Tesla publishes Model S efficiency and range stats, expects 350 highway miles per charge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 May 2012 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20235012/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/tesla-model-s-efficiency-range/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all electric</category><category>all-electric</category><category>AllElectric</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>car</category><category>cars</category><category>electric car</category><category>ElectricCar</category><category>model s</category><category>ModelS</category><category>performance</category><category>roadster</category><category>sedan</category><category>tesla</category><category>tesla model s</category><category>tesla motors</category><category>tesla roadster</category><category>TeslaModelS</category><category>TeslaMotors</category><category>TeslaRoadster</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AnTuTu pegs Galaxy S III as most powerful Android device, potentially reveals its specs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/"><img alt="AnTuTu pegs Galaxy S III as most powerful Android device, potentially reveals its specs" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/antutu-galaxys3.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 540px; height: 450px;" /></a></p><p> Ah, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+galaxy+s+iii/">Galaxy S III</a>. We always knew it'd be a keystone among Android smartphones, but according to the AnTuTu benchmark suite, it'll be the one device to rule them all. While there's no way to verify whether this test is indeed legitimate, all Android users may currently peep the AnTuTu app, which not only shows the smartphone as having bested the mighty <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-review/">Transformer Prime</a> tablet, but it also reveals the most comprehensive set of specs we've yet seen for the Galaxy S III -- again, take this with a grain of salt. The device is said to wield a Samsung <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/01/samsung-releases-1-5ghz-exynos-processor-and-16mp-cmos-for-mobil/">Exynos 4212 SoC</a> with a dual-core 1.4GHz CPU, 1GB of RAM and a 4.7-inch, 720p HD display. This lines up similarly with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/20/amazon-germany-leaks-galaxy-s-iii-specs/">product listing</a> from Amazon Germany, as the specs also reveal a 12 megapixel primary camera on the rear, along with a 2MP shooter on the front. No big surprises for the OS, which is listed as Android 4.0. Should the benchmark tests turn out to be legitimate, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/htc-one-x-review/">HTC One X</a> will no doubt have some very stiff competition.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> Samsung has revealed the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/">1.4GHz Exynos 4 Quad</a> as the basis for its next superphone.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/">AnTuTu pegs Galaxy S III as most powerful Android device, potentially reveals its specs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20224388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 4.0</category><category>Android4.0</category><category>antutu</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>exynos 4212</category><category>Exynos4212</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>google</category><category>ice cream sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>leaks</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LG Optimus 3D Max wages dual-core war in benchmark tests]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/"><img alt="LG Optimus 3D Max wages a dual-core war in benchmark tests" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/lgbenchmarks.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 503px; height: 440px;" /></a></div>A mere day has passed since we stumbled upon initial benchmarks for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/">Optimus 4X HD</a>, and now, yet another LG smartphone has tossed its hat into the arena. In the Optimus 3D Max's arsenal is a dual-core 1.2GHz CPU, which is part of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/omap+4430">TI OMAP 4430 SoC</a>. Today, we pitted it against two dual-core contemporaries from HTC and Samsung -- namely, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/htc-one-s-review/">One S</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/samsung-galaxy-s-blaze-4g-review/">Galaxy S Blaze 4G</a>. Sadly, the Optimus 3D Max failed to put up much of a resistance to either smartphone, and while its scores remain unofficial, its plainly obvious that this LG will look sorely dated upon its arrival. You can see how it all unfolded just after the break.<br /><br />[Thanks, Konstantinos]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LG Optimus 3D Max wages dual-core war in benchmark tests</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/">LG Optimus 3D Max wages dual-core war in benchmark tests</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20213606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/lg-optimus-3d-max-benchmark-battle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>lg</category><category>lg optimus 3d max</category><category>LgOptimus3dMax</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>omap 4430</category><category>Omap4430</category><category>optimus 3d max</category><category>Optimus3dMax</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>ti omap 4430</category><category>TiOmap4430</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LG Optimus 4X HD holds its own against HTC One X in initial benchmarks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/"><img alt="LG Optimus 4X HD gets initial benchmarks, holds its own against One X" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/optimus4xbenchmark.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 480px; height: 440px;" /></a></div>When we first laid our hands on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/lg-optimus-4x-hands-on/">LG's Optimus 4X</a> at Mobile World Congress, we were left with mixed impressions, which was due in part to its pre-release software. While the phone tore through web pages and pinch-to-zoom actions with 1080p video, it struggled to keep pace with LG's own custom UI -- an unfortunate echo of our experience with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/07/lg-optimus-2x-review/">Optimus 2X</a>. Now, LG's latest superphone has been put through the rigors of a few popular benchmark tests, which confirm there's plenty of quad-core, Tegra 3 potential inside this beast. While the Optimus 4X HD was easily surpassed by the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/htc-one-x-review/">One X</a> in Quadrant tests, it actually bested HTC's premiere handset in the similar AnTuTu benchmark. Keep in mind, these aren't final scores, as we'll perform our own tests with a retail unit, but if you'd like to see how everything unfolded, just hop the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LG Optimus 4X HD holds its own against HTC One X in initial benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/">LG Optimus 4X HD holds its own against HTC One X in initial benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20211730/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/lg-optimus-4x-gets-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>benchmark</category><category>google</category><category>lg</category><category>lg optimus 4x hd</category><category>LgOptimus4xHd</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>nvidia</category><category>optimus 4x</category><category>optimus 4x hd</category><category>Optimus4x</category><category>Optimus4xHd</category><category>quad-core</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tegra 3</category><category>Tegra3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/"><img alt="Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not the ambitious kind" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/lenovo-k800-quadrant.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>If Lenovo's sticking to its promise, it should only be another two months maximum before its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Intel Medfield</a>-powered K800 smartphone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-first-smartphone-lenovo-k800-launch-china-ces-2012/">debuts</a> in China. Until then, we won't know the full potential of the 1.6GHz Atom Z2460 powering Ice Cream Sandwich, but we do have the next best thing for now: what we've just obtained are some benchmark results from a K800 prototype with Android 2.3.7, and while the graphics performance wasn't top notch this time round, the general score performance came close to that of the Galaxy Note (powered by a 1.4GHz dual-core Exynos chipset).<br /><br />However, the K800 did beat pretty much everyone -- including the brand-spanking-new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/one+x">One X</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/one+s">One S</a> from HTC -- in the SunSpider 0.91 Javascript test, where it only took 1,270ms to complete! What remains to be seen is whether Medfield will really deliver a better battery performance than its competitors; so until we find the answer (along with improved scores) on a final unit, you'll just have to make do with our list of scores after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/">Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20210333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.6ghz</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3.7</category><category>Android2.3.7</category><category>atom</category><category>atom z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>benchmark</category><category>cellphone</category><category>exclusive</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>intel</category><category>k800</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo k800</category><category>LenovoK800</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobile phone</category><category>MobilePhone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>phone</category><category>smartphone</category><category>z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC One X for AT&amp;T benchmarked: impressive, most impressive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/onex.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>The One X is not <em>officially</em> here... <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/htc-and-sprint-ready-to-show-off-a-new-collaboration-april-4th/">yet</a>. That hasn't stopped someone from putting the new superphone through the benchmarking wringer, however. Turns out, that dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/QualcommSnapdragonS4/">Snapdragon S4 SoC</a> may be all it's cracked up to be, as screencaps have popped up online showing scores that blow away damn near every mobile device under the sun. Apparently, an AT&amp;T employee put the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/atandt-htc-one-x-hands-on/">One X</a> through its paces, and if the scores are to be believed, it smoked the Galaxy Nexus in Quadrant and handily outperformed even the quad-core Transformer Prime in Vellamo. So, it seems that Peter Chou's new favorite phone has the guts to match its handsome exterior, but don't take our word for it, see for yourself at the source below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/">HTC One X for AT&amp;T benchmarked: impressive, most impressive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20201444/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/htc-one-x-for-atandt-benchmarked-impressive-most-impressive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>htc</category><category>htc one x</category><category>HtcOneX</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>one x</category><category>OneX</category><category>quadrant</category><category>vellamo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sony Tegra 3 slate benchmarked, Tablet S successor on the way?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/"><img alt="Sony V150 shows up on NenaMark sporting Tegra 3 GPU" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/sonyv150-nenamarkscore9388-1332093878.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>If you're looking to benchmark tools for hints at Sony's next slate, then you're looking at a little number that calls itself the V150. According to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nenamark/">NenaMark</a> Android GPU benchmarking tool, this 1.4GHz tablet rocks a 1280 x 752 display and Android 4.0.3. An <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NvidiaTegra3/">Nvidia Tegra 3</a> helps this slate achieve a benchmark score of 59.70, which is well above the Tablet S' 42.89 average. Considering that Sony's last <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/sony-tablet-s-preview/">wedge-shaped wonder</a> has already seen a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/sony-cuts-tablet-s-price-by-100-now-starts-at-400-for-16gb/">sizable price drop</a>, it's looking like the firm may be gearing up to announce its replacement. We're reluctant to make the call with only a single benchmark score to go by, but we won't stop <em>you</em> from speculating.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/">Sony Tegra 3 slate benchmarked, Tablet S successor on the way?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20195801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/18/Sony-V150-outed-in-benchmark-with-tegra-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android 4.0.3</category><category>Android4.0.3</category><category>benchmark</category><category>ice cream sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>nenamark</category><category>nenamark1</category><category>Nvidia</category><category>Nvidia Tegra 3</category><category>NvidiaTegra3</category><category>Sony</category><category>Sony Tablet S</category><category>sony V150</category><category>SonyTabletS</category><category>SonyV150</category><category>Tablets</category><category>Tegra 3</category><category>Tegra3</category><category>v150</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New iPad gets benchmarked: 1GB RAM confirmed, no boost in CPU speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/ipadbenchmarkshthth.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Not only did some lucky gents in Vietnam get their hands on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-spotted-in-the-wild-unboxing-photos-in-tow/">new iPad</a> while most people are still refreshing their delivery status page, they were also kind enough to run some benchmark tests. The results confirm that the RAM has been upped to 1GB, with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/geekbench/">Geekbench</a> score settling at 756. The processor remains at 1GHz, again, which is what we expected, but puts the kibosh on any speculation that there might have been a slight bump in clock speeds. If you want to see the full breakdown, hit the source for the goods.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/">New iPad gets benchmarked: 1GB RAM confirmed, no boost in CPU speed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20191913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/new-ipad-gets-benchmarked-1gb-ram-confirmed-no-boost-in-cpu-sp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>clock speed</category><category>ClockSpeed</category><category>geekbench</category><category>ipad</category><category>ipad hd</category><category>IpadHd</category><category>new ipad</category><category>NewIpad</category><category>ram</category><category>slate</category><category>tablet</category><category>the new ipad</category><category>TheNewIpad</category><category>third-gen ipad</category><category>Third-genIpad</category><category>vietnam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Orange's Santa Clara Medfield phone gets benchmarked, well, the browser does]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/"><img alt="Santa Clara Vellamo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/intel-550x391.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Wondering how those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/">Medfield</a> handsets stack up to their ARM-powered competition? Well, we can't promise a full suite of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">benchmarks</a> just yet, but we do have a peek at a pair of browser-centric tests. The German Caschys Blog managed to get a hold of Orange's upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/orange-santa-clara-hands-on/">Santa Clara</a> device at CeBit and ran Qualcomm's Vellamo and Rightware's BrowserMark on the Atom handset. In both metrics the Z2460 more than holds its own, scoring an 89,180 on the web-based BrowserMark -- putting it just ahead of the iPhone 4S which clocks in at 87,801, but well behind the Galaxy Nexus' 98,272. Things look just as promising on the slightly more hardware-intensive Vellamo where it trounced the latest Nexus and was hot on the heels of the Xiaomi Mi-One Plus and Transformer Prime. Of course, neither of these tests really tax the CPU or measure 3D graphics performance. We're not even sure what the clock speed on chip inside the handset is. We were originally led to believe <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/orange-santa-clara-intel-medfield/">1.6GHz</a>, though, Caschy is reporting the model he manhandled was running at just 1.4GHz. Then, there's perhaps the biggest question of all -- battery life. For that, we'll just have to wait and see.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/">Orange's Santa Clara Medfield phone gets benchmarked, well, the browser does</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>atom z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>browsermark</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel atom z2460</category><category>IntelAtomZ2460</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>orange</category><category>orange santa clara</category><category>OrangeSantaClara</category><category>Qualcomm Vellamo</category><category>QualcommVellamo</category><category>Rightware</category><category>Rightware Browsermark</category><category>RightwareBrowsermark</category><category>santa clara</category><category>SantaClara</category><category>test</category><category>tests</category><category>Vellamo</category><category>z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge benchmarks: CPU boosted 5-15 percent, onboard GPU handles Skyrim]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/ivy-bridge-benchmark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>We've heard <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-hypes-ivy-bridge-leaves-poor-old-sandy-in-its-wake/">whispers</a> of Ivy Bridge's benchmarking prowess, but now we have more comprehensive and independent test results of a Core i7 3770K CPU, courtesy of <em>AnandTech</em>. The conclusion? The upgrade is "quite good," which is Anand Lal Shimpi's way of describing a 5-15 percent boost in CPU performance for the same money as Sandy Bridge, not to mention lower power consumption and the ability to run the latest games on the HD 4000 integrated graphics. Of course, this latter discovery requires clarification: some games, such as Metro 2033 could only achieve 30fps at a max resolution of 1366 x 768, but others fared better. Crysis Warhead ran at 50fps even at 1680 x 1050. With that type of onboard oomph, you'd have to spend over $100 on a discrete graphics card for it to be worthwhile, which even Lal Shimpi acknowledges is "sort of insane". Check out the source link for more.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/">Ivy Bridge benchmarks: CPU boosted 5-15 percent, onboard GPU handles Skyrim</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20187687/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anandtech</category><category>benchmark</category><category>game</category><category>gaming</category><category>hd 4000</category><category>Hd4000</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>onboard graphics</category><category>OnboardGraphics</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OMAP 5's dual A15 cores wipe the floor with four A9s in browsing benchmark]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/"><img alt="OMAP 5" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/ti-omap5-video-2.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 600px; height: 336px; " /></a></div>We've seen Texas Instrument's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/ti-omap-5-exclusive-demo-laptops-ultrabooks-ces-2012-video/">OMAP 5</a> in action, but we haven't been able to pit it directly against a competitor. The Dallas company must be growing more and more confident in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/07/ti-announces-omap-5-two-high-performance-and-two-low-power-core/">product</a> however, as its posted a video demoing its pair of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/arma15">A15</a> cores alongside an unspecified quad-core A9 part -- presumably the Tegra 3. The video shows the next-gen TI part powering through the EEMBC BrowsingBench in 95 seconds, while its opposition takes a whopping 201. What's more, this thrashing was performed by an 800MHz part -- the four A9s were clocked at 1.3GHz. Of course, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra3">Tegra 3s</a> are already in shipping products, while the OMAP 5 might not find a home in consumer devices before 2013. It's also unclear just how much of a hit these new high-powered ARM cores will have on battery life or how much the pair of M4 companion cores helped in the benchmark. Head on after the break to watch a pair of tablets load up 20 websites in quick succession.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>OMAP 5's dual A15 cores wipe the floor with four A9s in browsing benchmark</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/">OMAP 5's dual A15 cores wipe the floor with four A9s in browsing benchmark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20177975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/omap-5s-dual-a15-cores-wipe-the-floor-with-four-a9s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arm</category><category>arm a15</category><category>ArmA15</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>BrowsingBench</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>numbers</category><category>omap</category><category>omap 5</category><category>Omap5</category><category>Texas Instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>TI</category><category>TI OMAP 5</category><category>TiOmap5</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC Ville to run on a dual-core Snapdragon S4?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/htc-ville-benchmark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Well looky here. A phone bearing the alluring name of "HTC VLE_U" just cropped up on NenaMark2 with a healthy 57.50 average frame rate. More interesting than the score, however, is the reference to a Qualcomm Adreno 225 GPU, which -- assuming this is legit -- strongly implies the presence of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/">powerful</a> Snapdragon S4 sitting in the Ville's engine compartment. This tallies with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/htc-ville-gets-hands-on-en-francais-is-presumably-practicing-it/">earlier hints</a> of the Ville carrying a 1.5GHz dual-core processor along with a (roughly) qHD display, and it also lines up with another MSM8960 benchmark from a reference handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">spotted</a> a few weeks ago. By extension, all the Tegra 3 smoke that's been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/htc-endeavor-specs-revealed/">billowing</a> out of HTC recently must come from an entirely different fire -- namely the Endeavor or One X. Either way, it's certainly nice to see HTC hotting up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/">HTC Ville to run on a dual-core Snapdragon S4?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20177913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/htc-ville-to-run-on-a-dual-core-snapdragon-s4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adreno</category><category>adreno 225</category><category>Adreno225</category><category>benchmark</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>gpu</category><category>handset</category><category>HTC</category><category>HTC Ville</category><category>HTC VLE_U</category><category>HtcVille</category><category>HtcVle_u</category><category>krait</category><category>leak</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>nenamark</category><category>nenamark2</category><category>phone</category><category>processor</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>snapdragon</category><category>Snapdragon S4</category><category>SnapdragonS4</category><category>Ville</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm Krait S4 SoC fully benchmarked, diagnosed as 'insane']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/"><img alt="Qualcomm Krait S4 benchmarks" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/kraitbenchmark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>We've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/qualcomms-snapdragon-s4-flexes-its-imaging-muscle-video/">seen it</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/qualcomm-announces-snapdragon-s4-liquid-mobile-development-platf/">touched it</a> and we fully expect it'll be turning heads in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MWC+2012/">Barcelona</a> next week, but until now Qualcomm's Krait chip has largely escaped the rigors of independent benchmarking. Fortunately, <em>AnandTech</em> has to come to our rescue once again with a characteristically thorough analysis at the source link. Those blue and green charts can speak for themselves, but if you're in a rush then here's the rub of it: the Krait truly is a next-gen SoC, with the dual-core 1.5GHz MSM8960-powered reference handset delivering an "insane performance advantage" of between 20 percent and <em>240 percent</em> on CPU benchmarks. As we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">glimpsed</a> recently, graphics performance is somewhat less ground-breaking but still very healthy, with the 28nm process allowing the Adreno 225 GPU to run at up to 400MHz, versus 266MHz on its Adreno 220 predecessor. Oh yes, this is going to be one mother of an MWC.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/">Qualcomm Krait S4 SoC fully benchmarked, diagnosed as 'insane'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20175797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/21/qualcomm-krait-s4-soc-fully-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>ad</category><category>anandtech</category><category>Andrew Bynum</category><category>AndrewBynum</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>krait</category><category>mobile world congress</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MobileWorldCongress</category><category>MSM8960</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>qualcomm snapdragon s4</category><category>QualcommSnapdragonS4</category><category>reference handset</category><category>ReferenceHandset</category><category>s4</category><category>snapdragon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/dnp-is-this-the-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmark-tests-suggest/"><img alt="Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/bench.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Pinch of salt time. As mobile manufacturers polish up those final test models ready for us to pore over in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MWC+2012/">just a few weeks</a>, someone's possibly jumped the gun. What you're looking at here are apparently benchmarks from the Galaxy S II Plus -- yep, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/samsung-galaxy-s-advance-smartphone-announced/">another</a> incremental step-up for an existing Samsung device. According to the results, the phone will carry the same resolution screen of the original (800 x 480), but will purportedly be the first device to carry a dual-core 1.5GHz Exynos processor -- placing it just ahead of even the Galaxy Note. Unfortunately, the benchmark read-out also lists Android 2.3.4 for the phone -- a little old (and unlikely) when we're seeing version 2.3.7 if not a leap to Ice Cream Sandwich. Benchmark results featuring a Galaxy Nexus with a 2GHz processor (possibly overclocked) has also got us all kinds of suspicious. We'll be keeping our eyes on this one.<br /> <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/">Is this the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus? Leaked benchmarks suggest new 1.5GHz dual-core Exynos processor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20162605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/is-this-the-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-plus-leaked-benchmarks-suggest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.5ghz</category><category>android</category><category>Android 2.3.4</category><category>Android2.3.4</category><category>benchmark</category><category>dual-core</category><category>exynos</category><category>Galaxy S II +</category><category>GalaxySIi+</category><category>google</category><category>leak</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung Galaxy S II</category><category>Samsung Galaxy S II Plus</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIi</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIiPlus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/"><img alt="Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc07597-1327916170.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> We put <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/">Qualcomm's S4 development platform</a> through its paces (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-qualcomm/">twice</a>, no less) at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces/">CES</a>, but shorn of the glitz of Las Vegas, does it have the oomph to wow us? Someone at the company <em>loosed </em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Nenamark 2</a> on the slate, producing a score of 54.90. Given the fact that its producing graphics for a 1024 x 600 screen, we're excited to see it comfortably edge the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-review/">Galaxy S II Skyrocket </a>(54.1) and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/samsung-galaxy-note-review/">Galaxy Note</a> (32.8) -- with our mouths watering at the thought of what this 28nm CPU can do in a smartphone. We've included the benchmark in full after the break, if you're ready for such exciting revelations.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/">Qualcomm's MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 benchmarks pop up online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20159568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/qualcomms-msm8960-snapdragon-s4-benchmarks-pop-up-online/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>28 Nanometer</category><category>28Nanometer</category><category>28nm</category><category>Adreno 225</category><category>Adreno 225GPU</category><category>Adreno225</category><category>Adreno225gpu</category><category>Benchmark</category><category>Benchmarks</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Nenamark</category><category>Nenamark 2</category><category>Nenamark2</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm MSM8960</category><category>Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon</category><category>Qualcomm Snapdragon S4</category><category>QualcommMsm8960</category><category>QualcommMsm8960Snapdragon</category><category>QualcommSnapdragonS4</category><category>Snapdragon</category><category>Snapdragon S4</category><category>Snapdragon S4 Adreno 225</category><category>SnapdragonS4</category><category>SnapdragonS4Adreno225</category><category>Tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>caffeinemark</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>leaks</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>soc</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Early Atom N2600 benchmark, can't cedar wood for the trails?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/n2600benchmarking131211.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It goes without saying that benchmarking something pre-release requires a cavalcade of sodium-chloride, but our curiosity was piqued at the prospect of some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedar+trail">Cedar Trail</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">sneak-peeks</a>. <em>Netbook Live</em> has been at it again, pitting a 1.6GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/atom/">Atom</a> N2600-touting ASUS Eee PC X101CH, against machines sporting 1.66GHz Atom <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/N570">N570</a> (ASUS 1015PX) and 1.0 GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/amd+c-50">AMD C-50</a> (ASUS 1015B and Tosh NB550D) chips. The initial reports suggest that the 32nm-based N2600 is a touch behind the N570 in general CPU terms, but forges confidently ahead when it comes to graphics. The C-50 showed mixed results in CPU tests, with the N2600 falling behind on graphics this time round. The take-away being if you need more CPU <em>oomph</em> go for the meatier 1.83 GHz N2800. Hit the source link for the blow by blow breakdown.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/">Early Atom N2600 benchmark, can't cedar wood for the trails?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20126767/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/early-atom-n2600-benchmark-cant-cedar-wood-for-the-trails/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.6GHz</category><category>1.83 ghz</category><category>1.83Ghz</category><category>AMD C-50</category><category>AmdC-50</category><category>ASUS 1015B</category><category>ASUS 1015PX</category><category>ASUS Eee PC X101CH</category><category>Asus1015b</category><category>Asus1015px</category><category>AsusEeePcX101ch</category><category>atom</category><category>Atom N2600</category><category>Atom N570</category><category>AtomN2600</category><category>AtomN570</category><category>benchmark</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>N2800</category><category>Toshiba NB550D</category><category>ToshibaNb550d</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/antutu.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p>
<p>
	LG and Prada may have already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/lg-prada-officially-renew-phone-partnership-confirm-v3-0-for-e/">renewed</a> their wedding vows, but it's been pretty quiet on the designer phone front. However, a stream of benchmark results have surfaced over at <em>Antutu</em>, revealing an LG phone with a 1GHz CPU running Android Gingerbread -- version 2.3.7 to be precise. The handset is labelled up as the P940, suggesting that this could well be the fruits of labor from the fashion-phonemaker collaboration -- aka the Prada K2. A device with the same codename has already paid a visit to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/fcc-fridays-november-4-2011/">FCC</a>, although it kept quiet on the hardware specifics, not revealing much more than a clutch of GPRS and HSPA radios. Rumors suggest the hardware will all be contained in an appropriately stylish 9mm frame, but we'll just have to wait and see. It may be just a sliver of a smartphone, but we hope LG <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/28/more-optimus-handsets-will-receive-ice-cream-sandwich-upgrade-l/">considers</a> feeding it some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-review/">Ice Cream Sandwich</a> before it makes its debut. Not too much though, it still needs to fit into that Prada outfit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/">LG P940 phone gets benchmarked, is the Prada K2 ready to turn heads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/lg-p940-phone-gets-benchmarked-is-the-prada-k2-ready-to-turn-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>android gingerbread</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>AndroidGingerbread</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>Gingerbread</category><category>Google</category><category>k2</category><category>LG</category><category>LG P940</category><category>LgP940</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Prada</category><category>prada k2</category><category>PradaK2</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/android-futuremark.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Futuremark, father of <em>3DMark</em> and <em>PCMark</em>, has begun work on an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review/">Android</a> edition of its benchmarking software. Wittily titled <em>3DMark for Android</em>, it'll bring the industry-standard testing tools to all the phones in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/ice-cream-sandwich-gets-a-two-minute-tour-courtesy-of-a-lucky-e/">Google's yard</a>. When finished, users will be able to measure performance by pushing the phone's CPU, rendering, openGL and physics engines to the limits. Results will be comparable against the company's newest software, including the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/windows-8-for-tablets-hands-on-preview/">Windows 8</a> build. It's inviting handset makers to join a benchmark development program, an exclusive club that already has AMD, NVIDIA, Intel, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ImaginationTechnologies">Imagination Technologies</a>, Dell and HP on the guest list, you can see the full PR after the break -- just be advised, it's black tie only.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/">3D Mark is coming to Android phones near you in 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20117412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/30/3d-mark-is-coming-to-android-phones-near-you-in-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D Mark</category><category>3dMark</category><category>3DMark for Android</category><category>3dmarkForAndroid</category><category>AMD</category><category>Android</category><category>Benchmark</category><category>Benchmark Development Program</category><category>BenchmarkDevelopmentProgram</category><category>Futuremark</category><category>Futuremark 3DMark</category><category>Futuremark PCMark</category><category>Futuremark3dmark</category><category>FuturemarkPcmark</category><category>Google</category><category>Imagination Technologies</category><category>ImaginationTechnologies</category><category>Intel</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Nvidia</category><category>PCMark</category><category>Windows 8</category><category>Windows8</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/ocz-octane.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Maybe it's just interference from our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/holidaygiftguide2011/">seasonal goggles</a>, but isn't there something quite cheery about SSD reviews? In the case of OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ocz-pushes-access-time-boundaries-with-octane-and-octane-s2-ssds/">Octane</a> drive, our good spirits derive from the sturdy performance of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/14/ocz-buys-indilinx-probably-has-designs-on-building-its-own-ssd/">freshly-conceived</a> Indilinx Everest controller, which ought to keep big players like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">SandForce</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung+ssd/">Samsung</a> on their toes. <em>HotHardware</em> just reviewed the <strike>$369</strike> $879 512GB variant and found that it delivered fast boot-up times, strong read speeds and writes that were just shy of enthusiast-class drives. Follow the source link for the full and possibly festive benchmarks.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Sorry about the optimistic price error. Guess we got carried away with all the holiday discounts. As many of y'all spotted, it's the 256GB version that goes for $369.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> We just added links to reviews from <em>AnandTech</em> and <em>Storage Review</em>, which both arrived at similarly positive conclusions. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/">OCZ Octane SSD benchmarked, new Indilinx controller holds its ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ocz-octane-ssd-benchmarked-new-indilinx-controller-holds-its-gr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>BenchmarkSoftware</category><category>controller</category><category>everest</category><category>hard drive</category><category>HardDrive</category><category>indilinx</category><category>indilinx everest</category><category>IndilinxEverest</category><category>ocz</category><category>ocz octane</category><category>OCZ SSD</category><category>OCZ Technology</category><category>OczOctane</category><category>OczSsd</category><category>OczTechnology</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state disk</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state drives</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDisk</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateDrives</category><category>ssd</category><category>ssd controller</category><category>SsdController</category><category>ssds</category><category>storage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC Jetstream review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jetstream-lede-image-final-cropped.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
When HTC entered the tablet game, it did so in reverse course. Where other manufacturers were jostling for elbow room in a 10-inch form factored world, the company opted for smaller, more familiar battleground, eschewing the rough-hewn <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb/">Honeycomb OS</a> for a Gingerbread-baked Sense overlay on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/htc-flyer-review/">the Flyer</a>. Naturally, the time for that mini-slate to shine has come and gone. In its stead, we're treated to a flagship of sorts -- HTC's first 10-incher and AT&amp;T's inaugural <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/atandt-commits-to-lte-advanced-deployment-in-2013-hesse-and-mead/">4G LTE</a> slate. Android 3.1 makes an appearance here, as does Sense 1.1 for tablets, but is the skinned experience really any different from the custom UX we've all come to love or hate on phones? Can the added <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/htc+scribe/">Scribe pen</a> functionality, repurposed here from its 7-inch brother, transform the Jetstream from third pillar offering to an always-on, on-the-go assistant? And will those newly hatched 700MHz speeds convince you to cough up for that weighty $700 price tag? Follow along past the break to see how it fared.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568083"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv53dsc00552_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568081"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv51dsc00546_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568082"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv52dsc00550_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568084"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv54dsc00553_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-jetstream-review/#4568085"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jrv55dsc00556_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/">HTC Jetstream review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20094212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/htc-jetstream-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.3 megapixel</category><category>1.3Megapixel</category><category>1.5GHz</category><category>10.1 inch</category><category>10.1-inch</category><category>10.1Inch</category><category>4G</category><category>8 megapixel</category><category>8Megapixel</category><category>Android</category><category>Android 3.1</category><category>Android honeycomb</category><category>android tablet</category><category>Android3.1</category><category>AndroidHoneycomb</category><category>AndroidTablet</category><category>att</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>digitizer</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>Honeycomb</category><category>honeycomb tablet</category><category>HoneycombTablet</category><category>HSPA plus</category><category>HSPA+</category><category>HspaPlus</category><category>HTC</category><category>HTC Jetstream</category><category>htc puccini</category><category>HTC Scribe</category><category>HTC Scribe pen</category><category>HtcJetstream</category><category>HtcPuccini</category><category>HtcScribe</category><category>HtcScribePen</category><category>Jetstream</category><category>lte</category><category>lte tablet</category><category>LteTablet</category><category>puccini</category><category>review</category><category>Scribe</category><category>sense</category><category>sense 1.1</category><category>sense for tablets</category><category>sense ux</category><category>Sense1.1</category><category>SenseForTablets</category><category>SenseUx</category><category>slate</category><category>Snapdragon msm 8260</category><category>SnapdragonMsm8260</category><category>stylus</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><category>WXGA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[webOS 3.0.5 clues point to integrated Twitter, better performance for your TouchPad]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/webos-synergy2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If you're the lucky owner of a rare 2011 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/hp-touchpad-review/">TouchPad</a>, the onus is on you to keep it clean, polished and updated. Sure, you've already got a decent Twitter client in the form Spaz HD, and you're getting extra snappy performance from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/hp-touchpad-gets-webos-3-0-4-update-now-able-to-answer-calls-fr/">webOS 3.0.4</a>, but web chatter indicates that something even better could be on the horizon. Developers have started tweeting via 'webOS Synergy', possibly hinting that integrated Twitter could be on the way in 3.0.5. What's more, another TouchPad owner running that newfangled version has submitted an impressive score to Lithium BenchMark, suggesting it might deliver a performance bump too. The duck may be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/28/hp-officially-out-of-touchpads-best-buy-can-still-help-you-ou/">dead</a>, but the dream <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/29/hps-todd-bradley-refutes-webos-shutdown-rumors-final-destinati/">lives on</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/">webOS 3.0.5 clues point to integrated Twitter, better performance for your TouchPad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20097401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/webos-3-0-5-clues-point-to-integrated-twitter-better-performanc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>hp</category><category>hp touchpad</category><category>HpTouchpad</category><category>integrated twitter</category><category>IntegratedTwitter</category><category>performance</category><category>spaz hd</category><category>SpazHd</category><category>touchpad</category><category>Twitter</category><category>twitter integration</category><category>TwitterIntegration</category><category>update</category><category>webos</category><category>webos 3.0.4</category><category>webos 3.0.5</category><category>Webos3.0.4</category><category>Webos3.0.5</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cedar Trail-powered Asus VX6S netbook gets some early benchmarks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/asus-lamborghini-vx6snew-netbookwithintel-cedar-trail.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Benchmarking unreleased hardware is a dodgy business, largely because you're not working with final drivers. Nevertheless, <em>Netbook Live</em>'s latest efforts could possibly be seen as establishing a bare minimum of what Cedar Trail is capable of. They put a 12-inch Asus Lamborghini VX6S netbook containing the next-gen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intels-cedar-trail-gets-some-specs-combines-cpu-and-gpu-on-a-s/">Intel D2700 Atom CPU</a> and the AMD Radeon 6470M GPU up against its Pine Trail/ION2-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/asus-lamborghini-vx6-and-vx7-peel-out-with-nvidia-ion-2-and-core/">VX6 predecessor</a>. For good measure, they also threw in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/01/asus-eee-pc-1015b-and-1215b-hands-on/">Eee PC 1215B</a> running on AMD's Zacate E-350 APU (not the superior <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/07/msi-x370-with-amd-e-450-upgrade-arrives-stateside/">E-450</a>). The PC Mark benchmarks gave the VX6S a gain of around ten percent against the Eee PC, with the VX6 coming a distant third-- not quite revolutionary, but that's what you get for being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/22/cedar-trail-may-be-delayed-new-atoms-gone-til-november/">impatient</a>. Click the source link for more.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Jimmy]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/">Cedar Trail-powered Asus VX6S netbook gets some early benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20083745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/18/cedar-trail-powered-asus-vx6s-netbook-gets-some-early-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>AMD Radeon 6470M</category><category>AmdRadeon6470m</category><category>Asus</category><category>ASUS Lamborghini</category><category>ASUS Lamborghini VX6</category><category>ASUS Lamborghini VX6s</category><category>AsusLamborghini</category><category>AsusLamborghiniVx6</category><category>AsusLamborghiniVx6s</category><category>benchmark</category><category>Cedar Trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>Lamborghini VX6S</category><category>LamborghiniVx6s</category><category>netbook</category><category>Radeon HD 5870</category><category>RadeonHd5870</category><category>VX6S</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Benchmarks clock iPhone 4S' A5 CPU at 800MHz, show major GPU upgrade over iPhone 4]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/benchmark.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	Pre-orders for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple+iphone+4s/">iPhone 4S</a> only <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/10/iphone-4s-pre-orders-are-in-the-mail/">began shipping</a> this week, but a handful of early owners have already taken Apple's first A5-based smartphone for a test run, and they've got the benchmarks to prove it. The results, obtained by <em>AnandTech</em>, are hardly what we'd call shocking. In terms of Javascript performance (pictured above), the 4S measures up rather nicely against the Tegra 2-based Honeycomb competition, while out-dueling the iPhone 4 in overall CPU muscle. Geekbench results, meanwhile, clock the 4S at around 800MHz, with a score of 623. That's about 25 percent lower than the A5-based iPad 2, but notably higher than the iPhone 4 (see graphic, after the break). When it comes to GPU performance, GLBenchmark 2.1 tests in 1280 x 720, off-screen render mode place Apple's new handset well above the Galaxy S II, with scores of 122.7 and 67.1, respectively. It still trails the iPad 2, not surprisingly, but the 4S' scores show a major advantage over the iPhone 4, which registered a score of 15.3. For more statistics and graphics, check out the source link below.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Benchmarks clock iPhone 4S' A5 CPU at 800MHz, show major GPU upgrade over iPhone 4</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/">Benchmarks clock iPhone 4S' A5 CPU at 800MHz, show major GPU upgrade over iPhone 4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20078462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/11/benchmarks-clock-iphone-4s-a5-cpu-at-800mhz-show-major-gpu-upg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A5</category><category>anandtech</category><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>apple iphone 4s</category><category>AppleIphone4s</category><category>benchmark</category><category>clock</category><category>CPU</category><category>geekbench</category><category>GLBenchmark</category><category>GLBenchmark 2.1</category><category>Glbenchmark2.1</category><category>GPU</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>ios</category><category>ios 5</category><category>Ios5</category><category>ipad 2</category><category>Ipad2</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>iphone 4s</category><category>Iphone4</category><category>Iphone4s</category><category>javascript</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>performance</category><category>processing</category><category>speed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Storage enthusiasts (yeah, there <i>is</i> such a thing -- what of it?) would probably tell you that PCIe-based SSDs are a dime a dozen these days. But in all seriousness, the prices we're seeing are proof that a few more competitors wouldn't hurt. A few weeks back, Austria's own Angelbird <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/angelbirds-pcie-based-ssd-its-real-its-shipping-its-800mb/">started to ship</a> a solution that we first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/angelbirds-pcie-ssd-solution-brings-breakneck-speeds-achievabl/">heard about</a> during 2010, and we were fortunate enough to pop a Wings PCIe SSD RAID card into our Mac Pro for testing. For years, we've been booting this up and running every single application off of its stock HDD -- a 640GB Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 (7200RPM) -- as we surmise many of you desktop owners might be. Anxious to see if these are the Wings your existing tower needs to soar? Head on past the break for our impressions. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471496"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0203_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471495"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0204_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471494"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0205_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471493"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0206_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd/#4471491"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/angelbird-wings-pcie-ssd-hands-on0207_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/">Angelbird's Wings PCIe-based SSD preview and benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20048940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/23/angelbirds-wings-pcie-based-ssd-preview-and-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>angelbird</category><category>angelbird wings</category><category>AngelbirdWings</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarking</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>crest</category><category>europe</category><category>hard drive</category><category>HardDrive</category><category>hdd</category><category>impressions</category><category>nand</category><category>pci e</category><category>pci e ssd</category><category>pci express</category><category>pci express ssd</category><category>pci-e</category><category>pci-e ssd</category><category>Pci-eSsd</category><category>PciE</category><category>PciESsd</category><category>PciExpress</category><category>PciExpressSsd</category><category>preview</category><category>RAID</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>ssd</category><category>storage</category><category>wings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/htc-jeatstream83283947328493.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Thinking about picking up an (inconceivably <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/31/htcs-10-inch-puccini-tablet-gets-official-as-jetstream-brings/">expensive</a>) HTC Jetstream? After all, it just slipped into AT&amp;T's online store this weekend. We'll just leave this link to <em>HotHardware</em> in the source below, in case you want to check out some comparative benchmarks before trading $700 for a two-year contract. Not that it performed poorly mind you, it raced neck-and-neck with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/04/lenovo-ideapad-k1-review/">Lenovo's IdeaPad K1</a> -- we just like think charts and tables are cool. Videos too -- hit the break to see the folks at <em>HotHardware</em> give the 10-inch slate a quick hands-on.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/">HTC Jetstream hits AT&amp;T store, gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20034706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/05/htc-jetstream-hits-atandt-store-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android tablet</category><category>AndroidTablet</category><category>att</category><category>availability</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>hands-on</category><category>hothardware</category><category>HTC</category><category>HTC Jetstream</category><category>htc puccini</category><category>HtcJetstream</category><category>HtcPuccini</category><category>Jetstream</category><category>lte</category><category>lte tablet</category><category>LteTablet</category><category>puccini</category><category>sense</category><category>sense ux</category><category>SenseUx</category><category>slate</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WD's 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 1TB laptop hard drive gets benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/wd-1tb-laptop-hard-drive.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px; float: left;" /></a>These days, it's hard to shake the urge to pop a solid state drive into your next laptop, but even if you're down with dropping the requisite coin, the restrictive capacity choices may make it darn near impossible for pack rats to bite. For those fitting squarely into <i>that</i> category, there's Western Digital's newest laptop drive: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/western-digital-now-shipping-2-5-inch-1tb-scorpio-blue-hdd-in-st/">9.5mm 1TB Scorpio Blue</a>. It's one of the first in this form factor (read: the one that slips into most everything smaller than a Clevo) to hit the 1TB milestone, and at just $99, it's a veritable bargain. The benchmarking gurus over at <i>Hot Hardware</i> threw it through the usual gauntlet of tests, pitting it against a 500GB Scorpio Black and a 640GB Seagate Momentus. As you'd likely expect, the 1TB spinner bested the competition in SiSoftware, ATTO and CrystalDiskMark tests, though not by a tremendous margin. Still, taking performance up a notch while also boasting a full terabyte of space makes it somewhat of a no-brainer for capacity freaks, and you can hit the source for a barrage of charts proving as much.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/">WD's 9.5mm Scorpio Blue 1TB laptop hard drive gets benchmarked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20005325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/31/wds-9-5mm-scorpio-blue-1tb-laptop-hard-drive-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>9.5mm</category><category>9.5mm hdd</category><category>9.5mmHdd</category><category>advanced format</category><category>AdvancedFormat</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarked</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>hard drive</category><category>HardDrive</category><category>hdd</category><category>hitachi</category><category>now shipping</category><category>NowShipping</category><category>reviewed</category><category>scorpio blue</category><category>scorpio blue 1TB</category><category>ScorpioBlue</category><category>ScorpioBlue1tb</category><category>standard height</category><category>standard height hdd</category><category>StandardHeight</category><category>StandardHeightHdd</category><category>storage</category><category>wd</category><category>wd hdd</category><category>WdHdd</category><category>western digital</category><category>western digital scorpio blue 1tb</category><category>WesternDigital</category><category>WesternDigitalScorpioBlue1tb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<em><strong>Primed </strong>goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day -- we dig deep into each topic's history and how it benefits our lives. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at <strong>primed *at* engadget *dawt* com</strong>.</em><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<br />
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/eng-primed-logo-600-1324060476.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Staring at your smartphone, you realize that there's something missing. It does everything you want it to -- very well, we might add -- but what hole is left to fill? We'll help you out with this one: you want bragging rights. There <em>has</em> to be a way to face your friends with confidence, right? All you need is a little nudge in the right direction, and in this edition of Engadget Primed, we'll give you that much-needed shove by explaining benchmarks.<br />
<br />
Perhaps you've seen us talk about benchmarks in our product reviews. We'll typically use them to gauge the relative performance of various devices, but discussing a Linpack score doesn't mean much without going deeper into what it actually means. What aspects of performance do these benchmarks measure, and what techniques do they use? How much can we rely on them when making purchasing decisions? Read on after the break for the full scoop.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/">Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19983830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/engadget-primed-using-benchmarks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>cpu</category><category>engadget primed</category><category>EngadgetPrimed</category><category>gpu</category><category>html5</category><category>ios</category><category>iphone</category><category>javascript</category><category>linpack</category><category>nenamark</category><category>ookla</category><category>particle system</category><category>ParticleSystem</category><category>performance</category><category>primed</category><category>quadrant</category><category>speed test</category><category>speed tests</category><category>SpeedTest</category><category>SpeedTests</category><category>sunspider</category><category>webOS</category><category>wp7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/vellamo-lead.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Qualcomm's not exactly a novice when it comes to sizing up phones -- it's already responsible for the graphics benchmark <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Neocore/">Neocore</a>. Now, it also wants to show you just how much your mobile browser is lagging. The company just introduced Vellamo, a suite of 11 tests designed to gauge browser performance on Android phones and tablets. In case you're curious, it takes its name from the Finnish goddess of the sea who lures away <strike>sailors</strike> web surfers (Qualcomm's joke, not ours). And yes, it'll work with any device running Android 2.0 or above, even if it doesn't pack a Qualcomm-made processor. These tests span four broad categories -- rendering, JavaScript, user experience, and networking -- with only two requiring an internet connection (even then, you can cherry pick specific tests to run). We took it for a spin on our aging, Froyo-packing, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/motorola-droid-review/">Motorola Droid</a>, whose score of 237 landed at the very bottom of the list of results, far behind tablets and newer handsets. (As of this writing, Samsung's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-review/">Galaxy Tab 10.1</a> took the cake.) Curious to see how your device ranks? Hit the source link to download the free APK file.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/vellamo/">Vellamo</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/vellamo/#4296119"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/screenshot-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/vellamo/#4296120"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/screenshot-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/vellamo/#4296121"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/screenshot-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/vellamo/#4296122"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/screenshot-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/">Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19991463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/14/qualcomm-launches-vellamo-browser-benchmark-for-android-devices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>Android Market</category><category>AndroidMarket</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>browser</category><category>browsers</category><category>Google</category><category>JavaScript</category><category>mobile browser</category><category>mobile browsers</category><category>MobileBrowser</category><category>MobileBrowsers</category><category>Neocore</category><category>performance</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Vellamo</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Llano desktop APU gets reviewed: the best integrated graphics in town]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/"><img border="0" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/amd-take3.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
AMD is due to release a batch of new Llano APUs next month that are specifically tailored to desktops rather than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/">laptops</a>. The most powerful among them will be the 2.9GHz A8-3850, which has already caused a stir on the review circuit for one simple reason: it pulls off a brutal "one shot one kill" on Intel's HD 3000 integrated graphics. <em>AnandTech</em> raised an impressed eyebrow at the fact that all its benchmarking games were playable on the $135 AMD chip, which roughly doubled frame rates in titles like <em>Modern Warfare 2</em>, <em>Bioshock 2</em> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/world-of-warcraft-starter-edition-lets-you-reach-lvl-20-for-free/"><em>World of Warcraft</em></a> compared to the more expensive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-detailed-and-tested-exhaustively-actu/">Sandy Bridge</a> i5 2500K. <em>TechSpot</em> declared the APU its "new budget king," with graphical performance "on another level" compared even to an i7.<br />
<br />
However, the superlatives quickly evaporated once reviewers shifted their focus to the CPU. <em>TechReport</em> spotted that pure CPU performance per dollar was actually <em>lower</em> than what you'd get from a lowly i3. Moreover, it reckoned you'd only have to spend an extra $70 to buy a much more powerful CPU and a separate graphics card -- an option that comes "awfully close to making the A8-3850 seem irrelevant." Ouch. Nevertheless, if an affordable processor with integrated graphics is what you're after, then it's fair to say this one sets the standard. Click the source links below for full reviews.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/">AMD Llano desktop APU gets reviewed: the best integrated graphics in town</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19980239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/amd-llano-desktop-apu-gets-reviewed-the-best-integrated-graphic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A8-3850</category><category>Accelerated Processing Unit</category><category>AcceleratedProcessingUnit</category><category>all-in-one</category><category>AMD</category><category>AMD A8-3850</category><category>AMD Llano</category><category>AMD Llano A8-3850</category><category>AmdA8-3850</category><category>AmdLlano</category><category>AmdLlanoA8-3850</category><category>apu</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>CPU</category><category>DIY</category><category>entry-level</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion apu</category><category>FusionApu</category><category>gaming</category><category>gaming pc</category><category>gaming rig</category><category>GamingPc</category><category>GamingRig</category><category>GPU</category><category>HD 3000</category><category>Hd3000</category><category>htpc</category><category>integrated</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>Intel HD 3000</category><category>IntelHd3000</category><category>llano</category><category>Llano A8-3850</category><category>llano fusion apu</category><category>LlanoA8-3850</category><category>LlanoFusionApu</category><category>media pc</category><category>MediaPc</category><category>processor</category><category>processor speed</category><category>ProcessorSpeed</category><category>review</category><category>review round-up</category><category>review roundup</category><category>ReviewRound-up</category><category>ReviewRoundup</category><category>reviews</category><category>rig</category><category>speed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BAPCo calls 'liar, liar' on AMD, Intel still its golden prince]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/sysmark2012bapco062211-1308755100-1309439979.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/benchmarks/">Benchmarks</a> can be a bit of a back and forth schoolyard screaming match -- there's plenty of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/nexus-s-hacked-and-tweaked-to-slaughter-benchmarks-reality-be-d/">yelling, but not always much brute force to back it up </a> -- so let's take this case of 'he said / she said' with an even <em>coarser</em> grain of salt. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bapco/">BAPCo</a>, a non-profit whose members include major tech industry heavyweights, slapped back at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AMD/">AMD</a> today for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/">publicly dissing the SYSmark 2012 benchmark</a> it had an 80 percent hand in creating <em>and</em> for claming the group forced them out of the club. The chip maker had similar beef back in 2007 over Intel's benchmark-friendlier chips, and this appears to be the final straw that broke its GPU's back. On Monday, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/via/">VIA</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NVIDIA/">NVIDIA</a> also joined the ranks of the recently defected, but refrained from any superfluous PR finger-wagging. Wherever the truth may lie, for sure someone's got a case of the green-eyed monster, and it's definitely not us. We're looking at you, AMD.<br />
	<br />
	[Thanks, Muhammad; image courtesy <a href="http://www.bapco.com">BAPCo</a>]</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/">BAPCo calls 'liar, liar' on AMD, Intel still its golden prince</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19973600/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/bapco-calls-liar-liar-on-amd-intel-still-its-golden-prince/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>bapco</category><category>BAPCo SYSmark</category><category>BAPCo SYSmark 2012</category><category>BapcoSysmark</category><category>BAPCoSYSmark2012</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarking</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpu benchmark</category><category>CpuBenchmark</category><category>gpu</category><category>gpu benchmark</category><category>GpuBenchmark</category><category>Intel</category><category>llano</category><category>nigel dessau</category><category>NigelDessau</category><category>Nvidia</category><category>sysmark</category><category>VIA</category><category>x86 benchmark</category><category>X86Benchmark</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD resigns from BAPCo consortium, denounces SYSmark 2012 benchmark]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/2011-06-21-sysmark2012gui5.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a><br />
It's not uncommon for a company to make a public endorsement from time to time, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AMD/">AMD</a> today drafted a press release to announce that it's <em>not</em> endorsing a product -- BAPCo's SYSmark 2012 benchmark -- going so far as to drop out of the non-profit org to drive its point home. AMD claims that it attempted to work with BAPCo to focus testing on real-world usage, rather than traditional benchmarks that don't necessarily represent how we use computers today. Nigel Dessau, AMD's CMO, explains the decision on AMD's blog:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		"Unfortunately, our good intentions were met with an outcome that we believe does a disservice to the industry and our customers. We weren't able to effect positive change within BAPCo, and the resulting benchmark continues to distort workload performance and offers even less transparency to end users. Once again, BAPCo chose to ignore the opportunity to promote openness and transparency."</p>
</blockquote>
The biggest issue appears to be that SYSmark highlights processor speed while ignoring GPU power -- a significant flaw, considering GPUs now play a large role in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/13/amds-fusion-a-series-for-mainstream-laptops-official-10-5-hour/">overall system performance</a>.
<p>
</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD resigns from BAPCo consortium, denounces SYSmark 2012 benchmark</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/">AMD resigns from BAPCo consortium, denounces SYSmark 2012 benchmark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19972928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/amd-resigns-from-bapco-consortium-denounces-sysmark-2012-benchm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>bapco</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarking</category><category>nigel dessau</category><category>NigelDessau</category><category>sysmark</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:38:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
