<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Twitter hands over Occupy Wall Street protestor's updates under pressure]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/twitter-hands-over-occupy-wall-street-protestors-updates/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/twitter-hands-over-occupy-wall-street-protestors-updates/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/twitter-hands-over-occupy-wall-street-protestors-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/twitter-hands-over-occupy-wall-street-protestors-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Twitter hands over Occupy Wall Street protestor's updates under pressure" data-src-height="400" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/occupy-wall-street-brooklyn-bridge-paul-stein-flickr.jpg" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Twitter/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Twitter</a> has been building a modest reputation for siding with the little guy (or girl) when it comes to communication privacy, and it just demonstrated how far it's willing to go in a showdown with Manhattan's Criminal Court over a demand to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/140-characters-to-the-clink-occupy-wall-street-protester-loses/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">hand over tweets</a> from Occupy Wall Street protestor Malcolm Harris. The social network has been pushed into delivering the claimed evidence, but only as it faced a deadline and the threat of a fine -- it even tried one last request for a stay before producing hard copies of the messages. However much the handover affects Harris' chances at winning during trial, it emphasizes that public posts have serious consequences -- companies ultimately can't shield you from the law.</p><p> [Image credit: Paul Stein, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kapkap/6201523827/">Flickr</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/twitter-hands-over-occupy-wall-street-protestors-updates/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/09/14/twitter-loses-a-point-in-its-legal-battle-to-protect-occupy-protestors-tweets/" target="_blank">Forbes</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/twitter-occupy-idUSL1E8KE6QN20120914" target="_blank">Reuters</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>brooklyn bridge</category><category>BrooklynBridge</category><category>Civil Liberties</category><category>civil rights</category><category>CivilLiberties</category><category>CivilRights</category><category>internet</category><category>manhattan criminal court</category><category>ManhattanCriminalCourt</category><category>minipost</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>occupy wall street</category><category>OccupyWallStreet</category><category>privacy</category><category>protest</category><category>protestors</category><category>protests</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>twitter</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20323883</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[FBI reportedly pressing for backdoor access to Facebook, Google]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/05/fbi-wants-social-network-wiretap/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/05/fbi-wants-social-network-wiretap/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/05/fbi-wants-social-network-wiretap/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/05/fbi-wants-social-network-wiretap/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/this-phone-is-tapped.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 433px;" /></a></p><p> Investigators at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/FBI/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">FBI</a> supposedly aren't happy that social networks like Facebook or Google+ don't have the same kind of facility for wiretaps that phones have had for decades. If claimed industry contacts for <em>CNET</em> are right, senior staff at the bureau have floated a proposed amendment to the 1994-era Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) that would require that communication-based websites with large user bases include a backdoor for federal agents to snoop on suspects. It would still include the same requirement for a court order as for phone calls, even if US carriers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/02/telecoms-win-immunity-in-wiretapping-case-us-court-approves-sep/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">currently enjoy immunity</a> for cooperating with any <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/warrantlesswiretapping/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">warrantless wiretapping</a>. As might be expected, technology firms and civil liberties advocates like the Electronic Frontier Foundation object to deepening CALEA's reach any further, and Apple is thought to be preemptively lobbying against another definition of the law that might require a government back channel for audiovisual chat services like FaceTime or Skype. The FBI didn't explicitly confirm the proposal when asked, but it did say it was worried it might be "going dark" and couldn't enforce wiretaps.</p><p> [Image credit: David Drexler, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/87916032@N00/2041709855">Flickr</a>]</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/05/fbi-wants-social-network-wiretap/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Apple</category><category>calea</category><category>Civil Liberties</category><category>civil rights</category><category>CivilLiberties</category><category>CivilRights</category><category>Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act</category><category>CommunicationsAssistanceForLawEnforcementAct</category><category>eff</category><category>Electronic Frontier Foundation</category><category>ElectronicFrontierFoundation</category><category>facebook</category><category>facetime</category><category>fbi</category><category>Federal Bureau of Investigation</category><category>FederalBureauOfInvestigation</category><category>google plus</category><category>google+</category><category>GooglePlus</category><category>lobbying</category><category>lobbyists</category><category>privacy</category><category>privacy issues</category><category>PrivacyIssues</category><category>skype</category><category>wiretap</category><category>wiretapping</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 14:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20231776</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[American student finds GPS tracker stuck to car, FBI shows up to reclaim its 'federal property']]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/american-student-finds-gps-tracker-stuck-to-car-fbi-shows-up-to/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/american-student-finds-gps-tracker-stuck-to-car-fbi-shows-up-to/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/american-student-finds-gps-tracker-stuck-to-car-fbi-shows-up-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/american-student-finds-gps-tracker-stuck-to-car-fbi-shows-up-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img hspace="4" vspace="14" border="1" align="right" alt="American student finds GPS tracker stuck to car, FBI shows up to reclaim its 'federal property'" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/fbi-tracker-2010-10-08-250.jpg" /></a>Mechanics spot strange things stuck under cars all the time, but when 20-year-old Yasir Afifi's ride was put up on lifts his shop found something that hadn't been kicked up from the road: a cylindrical tube connected to a device with an antenna. An extremely paranoid person would think they'd found a bomb, but the truth isn't much better. It was an FBI tracking device. Afifi posted pictures and his story on <em>Reddit</em> while a friend contemplated cunning things to do with it, sticking it to someone else's car or selling it on Craigslist. They didn't have long to ponder long before two "sneaky-looking" people were spotted outside his apartment. Afifi got in his car and drove off, only to be pulled over by FBI agents who demanded the device back, threatening "We're going to make this much more difficult for you if you don't cooperate."<br />
<br />
Now, we've already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/26/new-privacy-laws-needed-that-entail-gps-technology-hot-headed-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">given our opinions</a> on using GPS technology like this and, while it's unknown whether these agents had a warrant to place this device, the 9th US Court of Appeals recently made one unnecessary for this sort of thing. The ACLU is working with Afifi to fight that ruling, and for now we're hoping that he, who is an American with an Egyptian father, is currently able to hit the town without agents following his every move. However, at this point they may not need a tracker: one agent who retrieved the device took the time to list off his favorite restaurants and even congratulated him on his new job.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/american-student-finds-gps-tracker-stuck-to-car-fbi-shows-up-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>aclu</category><category>american civil liberties union</category><category>AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion</category><category>civil rights</category><category>CivilRights</category><category>fbi</category><category>government</category><category>gps tracker</category><category>gps tracking</category><category>GpsTracker</category><category>GpsTracking</category><category>law</category><category>legality</category><category>watch list</category><category>WatchList</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19666250</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>