<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Email widget takes on viral rumors, fact checks for you]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/email-widget-lazytruth-fact-check/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/email-widget-lazytruth-fact-check/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/email-widget-lazytruth-fact-check/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/email-widget-lazytruth-fact-check/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Email widget takes on viral rumors, fact checks for you" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/facebook-charging-in-2011-copy.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 154px;" /></a></p><p> If you're one of those people who actually believes that <a href="http://www.facebook.com/Engadget">Facebook</a> is going to start charging users tomorrow, you're probably going to want to skip this post. LazyTruth is working on a Gmail widget -- something that could've easily been borne out of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/googlelabs?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Google Labs</a> -- that will automatically vet your messages and determine if they're full of viral misinformation. When it detects specific unique phrases that are consistent with known fallacies, it immediately circles back to Snopes.com and Factcheck.org (a pair of myth busting portals, if you couldn't guess) to provide original source links and even rebuttals. It seems like it could be a great way to make us all even <strike>lazier</strike> more efficient when it comes to debunking some of the wilder rumors that tend to affect our most gullible friends. Of course, given that there's no set release date just yet, perhaps the source link could use a scrubbing itself. We kid... we think.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/email-widget-lazytruth-fact-check/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>chain</category><category>email chain</category><category>EmailChain</category><category>gmail</category><category>hoax</category><category>hoax email</category><category>HoaxEmail</category><category>hoaxes</category><category>lazy truth</category><category>lazytruth</category><category>myth</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Verrecchio]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20232436</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nokia Plan B was just a hoax all along]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-plan-b-was-just-a-hoax-all-along/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-plan-b-was-just-a-hoax-all-along/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-plan-b-was-just-a-hoax-all-along/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-plan-b-was-just-a-hoax-all-along/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/02-16-11planb2.jpg" /><br />
</a></div>
There's been a lot of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-shareholders-and-unions-fight-back-against-microkia/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">chatter about a "Nokia Plan B"</a> over the past 48 hours -- the site was put up by "nine young investors" who outlined an audacious plan to rally shareholders, get themselves elected onto Nokia's board, and radically change the company's direction by firing Stephen Elop and committing massive resources to MeeGo. Needless to say, it resonated with many of Nokia's now disenfranchised fans and employees, and it made some serious waves -- enough so that Plan B was picked up by several major news outlets, including this morning's print edition of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.<br />
<br />
There's just one problem, though: the "nine young investors" don't really exist -- according to the last tweet on the @NokiaPlanB Twitter account, it was all a hoax perpetuated by "one very bored engineer who really likes his iPhone." Ouch. That explains why the now-defunct site abruptly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-shareholders-and-unions-fight-back-against-microkia/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">gave up the cause</a> this morning after just 36 hours of existence, and it definitely explains why we never got any response to our emails trying to get further information. We'll award points for bravado and for doing a better job of rallying the troops than Nokia itself, we suppose, but we're sure quite a few Nokia fans are going to be crushed at this news. On the bright side, Plan B did inspire the excellent <a href="http://nokiaplans.com/">NokiaPlanS.com</a>, which is sure to bring a smile to even the loneliest hearts in Espoo.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/nokia-plan-b-was-just-a-hoax-all-along/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>hoax</category><category>meego</category><category>nokia</category><category>nokia plan b</category><category>NokiaPlanB</category><category>plan b</category><category>PlanB</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19846937</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[April Fools' Day roundup: 'let me Topeka that for you' edition]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/april-fools-day-roundup-let-me-topeka-that-for-you-edition/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/april-fools-day-roundup-let-me-topeka-that-for-you-edition/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/april-fools-day-roundup-let-me-topeka-that-for-you-edition/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/april-fools-day-roundup-let-me-topeka-that-for-you-edition/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/1apr10googluj3btopeka.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Alright, good netizens of Engadget, it's time for us to bring you the sort of hard-hitting news content you can expect <em>only</em> on the first day of April. First on our slate we have the earthshaking news that Google is to officially rename itself Topeka, with <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/different-kind-of-company-name.html">the company's official blog</a> urging all future communications to be addressed to Topeka Inc. This is to honor the Kansas town that renamed itself Google in an effort to curry favor with Goog... excuse us, Topeka's 1Gbit broadband program. We also have exclusive and absolutely official confirmation of the forthcoming Android 2.5 update, an inflatable laptop from Toshiba, YouTube's textual deviance, and the hands-down best iPad dock you will ever see. You'll have to come after the break for all those -- they're too hot to handle out in the open. We'll be updating this post as the day goes along, so keep it locked.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/01/april-fools-day-roundup-let-me-topeka-that-for-you-edition/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>android 2.2</category><category>Android2.2</category><category>april fools</category><category>april fools day</category><category>AprilFools</category><category>AprilFoolsDay</category><category>froyo</category><category>google</category><category>hoax</category><category>hoaxes</category><category>icade</category><category>joke</category><category>jokes</category><category>kansas</category><category>prank</category><category>pranks</category><category>roundup</category><category>textp</category><category>topeka</category><category>toshiba</category><category>toshiba tubetop</category><category>ToshibaTubetop</category><category>tubetop</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 06:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19422639</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Video: USB powered chainsaw makes short work of a fake plastic tree]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/08/video-usb-powered-chainsaw-makes-short-work-of-a-fake-plastic-t/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/08/video-usb-powered-chainsaw-makes-short-work-of-a-fake-plastic-t/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/08/video-usb-powered-chainsaw-makes-short-work-of-a-fake-plastic-t/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.usbchainsaw.com/index.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/090707-isaw-02.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br />
<div align="left">As far as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/crapgadget,usb?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">USB gadgets</a> go, this is one of the more unique ones, that's for sure. And while we usually don't have much opportunity to play with chainsaws 'round these parts (not in an official capacity, at least), the recently launched usbchainsaw.com has us wondering: perhaps we could stand to be a little more bloodthirsty in our Engadget labs <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TortureTest/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">torture testing</a> -- if not for reasons of journalistic excellence, then at least for our own gratification. Of course, the i.Saw product website has all the hallmarks of a hoax -- but at least the video has provided some inspiration for the next time we're ready to wig out during a staff meeting. Check it out yourself after the break.</div>
</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/08/video-usb-powered-chainsaw-makes-short-work-of-a-fake-plastic-t/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>chainsaw</category><category>hoax</category><category>i.saw</category><category>usb</category><category>usb chainsaw</category><category>UsbChainsaw</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19089592</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Skullphone decides to speak, probably shouldn't have]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/skullphone-decides-to-speak-probably-shouldnt-have/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/skullphone-decides-to-speak-probably-shouldnt-have/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/skullphone-decides-to-speak-probably-shouldnt-have/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.papermag.com/blogs/2008/03/skullphone_speaks.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-25-08-billboard.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a>
<div align="left">Now that Skullphone's act of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/clear-channel-digital-billboards-in-socal-hax0r3d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">purported electronic billboard hackery</a> has been proven to be nothing more than a simple act of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/skullphones-clear-channel-billboards-not-hax0r3d-actually-pa1d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">forking over some cash</a>, the graffiti artist has apparently decided to try to explain things somewhat, albeit without going so far as to completely fess up. What's more, as evidenced by the tidbits of the conversion provided by PAPERMAG, Skullphone also didn't go so far as to make a lot of sense. On the central issue of hacking, Skullphone said that, "once again, it's a matter of semantics. What does it mean to hack the system. Is getting people to think for themselves hacking?" As if that wasn't enough profundity, Skullphone also said that "the art of hacking I know nothing about. What is hacking? What is art?," before going just a tad over the top by saying that "people thought Bob Dylan sold out when he went electric. I guess people weren't ready for it." If that's got you intrigued, you can hit up the link below for some more bits of wisdom.<br /><br />[Thanks, David]<br /></div>
</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/skullphone-decides-to-speak-probably-shouldnt-have/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>billboard</category><category>clear channel</category><category>ClearChannel</category><category>digital billboards</category><category>DigitalBillboards</category><category>hack</category><category>hoax</category><category>skullphone</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1151892</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Skullphone's Clear Channel billboards not hax0r3d, actually pa1d for]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/skullphones-clear-channel-billboards-not-hax0r3d-actually-pa1d/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/skullphones-clear-channel-billboards-not-hax0r3d-actually-pa1d/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/skullphones-clear-channel-billboards-not-hax0r3d-actually-pa1d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://la.curbed.com/archives/2008/03/billboard_hack.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-25-08-billboard.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
That <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/clear-channel-digital-billboards-in-socal-hax0r3d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Skullphone billboard hack</a> we saw yesterday had everyone at Engadget HQ pretty impressed with the corporate-pranking hijinks. Too bad it turns out that Skullphone is actually a phony (and total buster, we might add) who had to pay The Man (aka <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ClearChannel/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Clear Channel</a>) cold hard cash to "glitch up" the digital billboards. According to Curbed LA (and our reliable tipsters / commenters), Skullphone paid the massive media conglomerate for one-day Los Angeles-wide ads -- there was no hacking involved <em>at all</em>. From now on, he should just leave the signage-goofing to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/led-pranksters-remember-the-aqua-teen-hunger-force-bomb-scare/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the pros</a>, or at least make it clear there's some money changing hands. Fool us once, shame on you... and... we won't get fooled again.<br /><br />[Thanks, Dakota]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/26/skullphones-clear-channel-billboards-not-hax0r3d-actually-pa1d/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>billboard</category><category>clear channel</category><category>ClearChannel</category><category>digital billboards</category><category>digital graffiti</category><category>DigitalBillboards</category><category>DigitalGraffiti</category><category>fake</category><category>graffiti</category><category>hack</category><category>hacks</category><category>hoax</category><category>skull phone</category><category>SkullPhone</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1149834</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Yet another perpetual motion machine fails to prove anything]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/yet-another-perpetual-motion-machine-fails-to-prove-anything/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/yet-another-perpetual-motion-machine-fails-to-prove-anything/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/yet-another-perpetual-motion-machine-fails-to-prove-anything/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/300042"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-5-08-heins.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We want to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/18/steorn-inventors-of-infinite-energy-destroyers-of-laws-of-ther/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">believe</a>, we really do, but these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/04/steorns-orbo-free-energy-machine-demonstrated-tomorrow/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">failed attempts</a> and poorly-lit basement <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/05/perpetual-motion-machine-isnt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">videos</a> aren't exactly confidence inducing. Nevertheless, Thane Heins' Perepiteia generator has reportedly made its way down to a number of universities and labs across America, and while some onlookers did admit that "it works," none have been able to support any underlying theories. No need to keep dashing your dreams -- click on through for one more mind-numbing video of something akin to (but sadly, not) "perpetual motion."<br /><br />[Thanks, Mihir]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/yet-another-perpetual-motion-machine-fails-to-prove-anything/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>debunk</category><category>hoax</category><category>Perpetual motion</category><category>PerpetualMotion</category><category>science</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1107688</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[The gigantic "HTC Magnum" is convenient, inconspicuous]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pocketpt.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=20509"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/magnum.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /> </div>
We're not really sure what to make of this supposed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HTC/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HTC</a> "Magnum" that's been doing the rounds today. Sure, it looks like a gigantic, touchscreen HTC phone -- but we'd be hard-pressed to say this has any use outside of demo purposes and party time hijinks. Our guess is that this is a hilarious prank meant to thrill the interblogs, but it <span style="font-style: italic;">is</span> possible that HTC has decided to move away from the tried-and-true handheld market to a more robust, manly line of products. Like a participant in a cat-fight, we won't "go there" on the specs, suffice to say, they make it sound really, <span style="font-style: italic;">really</span> real. Check the video after the break to see the "phone" doing its thing, <span style="font-style: italic;">Ten Commandments</span>-style.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> Yep, <a href="http://www.pocketpt.net/forum/index.php?s=0731bcec9267dc0240efd759240dbed7&amp;showtopic=20527&amp;st=0&amp;p=129781&amp;#entry129781">not real</a>.<br /><br />[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/htc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HTC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/windows-mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Windows Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>giant cellphone</category><category>GiantCellphone</category><category>hoax</category><category>htc</category><category>htc magnum</category><category>HtcMagnum</category><category>joke</category><category>magnum</category><category>mobile</category><category>windows mobile</category><category>windowsmobile</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1107633</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[The gigantic "HTC Magnum" is convenient, inconspicuous]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pocketpt.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=20509"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/magnum.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a><br /> </div>
We're not really sure what to make of this supposed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HTC/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HTC</a> "Magnum" that's been doing the rounds today. Sure, it looks like a gigantic, touchscreen HTC phone -- but we'd be hard-pressed to say this has any use outside of demo purposes and party time hijinks. Our guess is that this is a hilarious prank meant to thrill the interblogs, but it <span style="font-style: italic;">is</span> possible that HTC has decided to move away from the tried-and-true handheld market to a more robust, manly line of products. Like a participant in a cat-fight, we won't "go there" on the specs, suffice to say, they make it sound really, <span style="font-style: italic;">really</span> real. Check the video after the break to see the "phone" doing its thing, <span style="font-style: italic;">Ten Commandments</span>-style.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> Yep, <a href="http://www.pocketpt.net/forum/index.php?s=0731bcec9267dc0240efd759240dbed7&amp;showtopic=20527&amp;st=0&amp;p=129781&amp;#entry129781">not real</a>.<br /><br />[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/the-gigantic-htc-magnum-is-convenient-inconspicuous/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>giant cellphone</category><category>GiantCellphone</category><category>hoax</category><category>htc</category><category>htc magnum</category><category>HtcMagnum</category><category>joke</category><category>magnum</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1107628</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Perpetual motion machine... isn't]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/05/perpetual-motion-machine-isnt/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/05/perpetual-motion-machine-isnt/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/05/perpetual-motion-machine-isnt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIvZJ9xGutI"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/01/pm_not.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Finally -- the laws of physics have been smashed to itty-bitty, succulent bits, like a thin piece of glass obliterated by a cartoon anvil -- all in some dude's low-lit basement. According to the video which you can watch after the break, a mysterious entity known as Alsetalokin has laser-gunned the forces of the universe to death with a perpetual motion device which he's demonstrated on an obscure internet website called YouTube. Like Fox Mulder, we want to believe, but just like the fate of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Steorn/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Steorn's</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Orbo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Orbo</a>, this is looking like another quickly-debunked fiasco. After a few hours of this clip doing the rounds, the hive-mind of the information superhighway began to pick it apart, piece by piece. The noise swelled so loudly that the original poster has actually changed his angle on the story, but that won't stop you from seeing the eye-shattering, star-bending magic of this magnet-driven motor.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://digg.com/gadgets/Perpetual_motion_machine_shown_on_Youtube">Digg</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/05/perpetual-motion-machine-isnt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>debunk</category><category>hoax</category><category>perpetual motion</category><category>PerpetualMotion</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1078431</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[EcoWatts "free energy" device rebuffed, BBC falls for it]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/ecowatts-free-energy-device-rebuffed-bbc-falls-for-it/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/ecowatts-free-energy-device-rebuffed-bbc-falls-for-it/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/ecowatts-free-energy-device-rebuffed-bbc-falls-for-it/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/free-energy/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/gadgety-thing.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/steorn-redux-more-mad-scientists-tout-free-energy-gadget/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">EcoWatts and its fake free energy gadget</a> is back in the limelight again, with the BBC Breakfast Show falling hook, line, and sinker in an interview with the company's "CEO" Paul Calver. Calver stated that "we're still getting to the question of why it works," explaining to a BBC presenter his bewilderment at his very own creation. The response from the interviewer? "The point is it does." Unfortunately, the point is that it almost certainly <em>doesn't</em>. Ben Goldacre used his excellent <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/free-energy/">Bad Science Guardian column this week</a> to dig up some dirt on the dodgy company, and managed to find a scientist who gave his stamp of approval to a similar free energy gadget four years back: "Using the apparatus provided, it's true, this scientist could get incredible results: the meters would read zero, and yet water would boil in around five minutes. Because the meters provided weren't working." The company that provided this former gadget along with the "broken" meters? EcoWatts.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/household/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Household</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/ecowatts-free-energy-device-rebuffed-bbc-falls-for-it/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>BBC</category><category>EcoWatts</category><category>Free energy</category><category>FreeEnergy</category><category>Heating</category><category>Hoax</category><category>Steorn</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1036360</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[No guy in a coma, no missed iPhone launch, no kidding]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/21/no-guy-in-a-coma-no-missed-iphone-launch-no-kidding/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/21/no-guy-in-a-coma-no-missed-iphone-launch-no-kidding/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/21/no-guy-in-a-coma-no-missed-iphone-launch-no-kidding/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2007/10/out-of-a-coma-i.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/evilageoff_iphone_8.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a>Didn't think we'd have to bother debunking something this obviously satirical, but about a zillion people have tipped us today with a link to a post on iPhone Savior about "Geoff Evila," who reportedly went into a coma in early June, causing him to miss the iPhone launch he had been so eagerly awaiting. He awoke from the coma four months later, and supposedly his close friend "Steve Denots" convinced the local Apple store in Chandler, Arizona to help recreate launch day for him so Geoff could experience what he'd missed. <br /><br />Sounds totally plausible, like the kind of filler you see every night on local TV news, right? Yeah, well besides all the obvious markers that this is a joke -- "Evila" is "Alive" spelled backwards, and the author's name, "Earl Sorel" is an anagram of "Real Loser" -- <a href="http://www.noelgreen.com/2007/07/using-the-iphone.html">the pic accompanying the post</a> was actually taken on launch day at the Apple store in Dallas. Yeah, it's definitely been slow around here today.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://digg.com">Digg</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/21/no-guy-in-a-coma-no-missed-iphone-launch-no-kidding/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>hoax</category><category>iphone</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rojas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|1018522</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Steorn redux: more mad "scientists" tout free energy gadget]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/steorn-redux-more-mad-scientists-tout-free-energy-gadget/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/steorn-redux-more-mad-scientists-tout-free-energy-gadget/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/steorn-redux-more-mad-scientists-tout-free-energy-gadget/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=481996&amp;in_page_id=1965"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/gadgety-thing.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
We don't want to take this seriously, so we won't. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/the-engadget-interview-sean-mccarthy-ceo-of-steorn/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Another company</a> has claimed to have produced a device that produces more energy than is put in, which --we shouldn't have to tell you -- is <em>impossible.</em> The Daily Mail is the dumb -- but actually kinda clever, 'cause they'll get lots of readers, and they don't mind bending the truth -- deliverer this time, adding some kind of twisted authority to the "news." The company behind the free publicity is called EcoWatts, who are apparently keen to sell their &pound;1,500-2,000 white tube thing to homeowners, with the aim of reducing their electricity bill (and not solving all the world's energy problems in one fell swoop, apparently.) Al<span style="font-style: italic;"></span>together now: <span style="font-style: italic;">"<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/the-engadget-interview-sean-mccarthy-ceo-of-steorn/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ughhh</a></span>.<span style="font-style: italic;">"<br /><br /></span>[Thanks, Alan]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/household/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Household</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/steorn-redux-more-mad-scientists-tout-free-energy-gadget/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Daily Mail</category><category>DailyMail</category><category>Fake</category><category>Free energy</category><category>FreeEnergy</category><category>Hoax</category><category>Perpetual Energy</category><category>PerpetualEnergy</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|990778</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows Vista "Brute Force Keygen" a hoax]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/03/windows-vista-brute-force-keygen-a-hoax/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/03/windows-vista-brute-force-keygen-a-hoax/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/03/windows-vista-brute-force-keygen-a-hoax/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://keznews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2782"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/03/vista-keyfinder.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It sounded too good to be true, and it turns out it was. KezNews forum frequenter "Computer User" confessed last night that his <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/02/brute-force-keygen-cracks-open-vista/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Brute Force Keygen hack</a> for Windows Vista is a scam. "Fact is the brute force keygen is a joke, i [sic] never intended for it to work. I have never gotten it to work, everyone should stop using it! Everyone who said they got a key a probably lying or mistaken!" Oddly enough, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes of ZD Net, who we sourced the news from yesterday, claims to have found two activation keys with this method, so it's hard to tell who to believe: a confessing prankster, or a potentially duped but trusted source. For the moment, we're going to go with Computer User's word on this one, because the likelihood that Microsoft would issue enough keys to make a random key generator at all viable for obtaining 25-character product keys is pretty dang slim.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/03/03/1339209.shtml">Slashdot</a>; thanks Matt]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/03/windows-vista-brute-force-keygen-a-hoax/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>brute force keygen</category><category>BruteForceKeygen</category><category>hack</category><category>hoax</category><category>keygen</category><category>microsoft</category><category>vista</category><category>windows vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|844980</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone June 15 date a hoax -- game on]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=802085&amp;fcc_id=%27BCGA1143%27"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/iphone-fcc-fake-real.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
Sorry everybody, we hate to be the bearers of bad news for you iPhone obsessives, but that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/06/apple-asks-fcc-for-iphone-confidentiality-until-june-15th/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">iPhone FCC letter dating it at June 15th</a>? It was a hoax. Our eagle-eyed friends over at <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/">Phone Scoop</a> noted that the confidentiality agreement document is, in actuality, photoshopped. We looked into the original filing for that new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/30/apple-busts-out-1-99-802-11n-enabler/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Airport Extreme base station</a> (FCC BCGA1143), which expired January 15th (days after the Airport device was announced), and is so far as we can tell they're wholly identical (save a bit of photo manipulation). That confidentiality agreement outlines a device for use on all the right frequencies for an 802.11a/b/g/n device (5180 - 5240MHz, 5190 - 5230MHz, 5745 - 5825MHz, 5755 - 5795MHz, 2412 - 2462MHz, 2422 - 2452MHz), too, so there's not a whole lot of doubt left. So, to everyone who thought they'd be getting their iPhone this June: sorry, we're all still in the dark on when Apple's going to launch. Click on for a bigger shots of the hoax FCC doc.<br /><br />[Thanks, <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/">Rich</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>fcc</category><category>hoax</category><category>iphone</category><category>mobile</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|750627</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone June 15 date a hoax -- game on]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=802085&amp;fcc_id='BCGA1143'"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/iphone-fcc-fake-real.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a><br /></div>
Sorry everybody, we hate to be the bearers of bad news for you iPhone obsessives, but that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/06/apple-asks-fcc-for-iphone-confidentiality-until-june-15th/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">iPhone FCC letter dating it at June 15th</a>? It was a hoax. Our eagle-eyed friends over at <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/">Phone Scoop</a> noted that the confidentiality agreement document is, in actuality, photoshopped. We looked into the original filing for that new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/30/apple-busts-out-1-99-802-11n-enabler/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Airport Extreme base station</a> (FCC BCGA1143), which expired January 15th (days after the Airport device was announced), and is so far as we can tell they're wholly identical (save a bit of photo manipulation). That confidentiality agreement outlines a device for use on all the right frequencies for an 802.11a/b/g/n device (5180 - 5240MHz, 5190 - 5230MHz, 5745 - 5825MHz, 5755 - 5795MHz, 2412 - 2462MHz, 2422 - 2452MHz), too, so there's not a whole lot of doubt left. So, to everyone who thought they'd be getting their iPhone this June: sorry, we're all still in the dark on when Apple's going to launch. Click on for a bigger shots of the hoax FCC doc.<br /><br />[Thanks, <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/">Rich</a>]
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/iphone-june-15-date-a-hoax-game-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>fcc</category><category>hoax</category><category>iphone</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|750626</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>