<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo roadmap outs Intel Chief River Ivy Bridge-equipped laptops for June 5th]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/uschannelupdate041112-2.pdf-page-33-of-49.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 315px;" /></a></p><p> Has the anticipation of finding out when Intel's Chief River <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IvyBridge/">Ivy Bridge</a> chipsets might finally become available got you all hot and bothered? Well, here's something to cool you down a bit, for now. A product roadmap from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lenovo/">Lenovo</a> explicitly lists June 5th as the official on-sale date for its <em>apparently</em> upcoming, yet still unannounced batch of laptops equipped with the silicon. As is still the case, the flow of information from Intel about its Ivy Bridge offerings has been less than a trickle -- if only the company itself would detail an official rollout date on its own for the stuff. You'll find the full document at the source link below, with the juicy details on listed on page 33.<br /> <br /> [Thanks, Brett]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/">Lenovo roadmap outs Intel Chief River Ivy Bridge-equipped laptops for June 5th</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20218127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/lenovo-roadmap-intel-chief-river-ivy-bridge-june-5th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chief river</category><category>ChiefRiver</category><category>intel</category><category>intel chief river ivy bridge</category><category>intel ivy bridge</category><category>IntelChiefRiverIvyBridge</category><category>IntelIvyBridge</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked roadmap</category><category>LeakedRoadmap</category><category>lenovo</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel leaks: ValleyView chip could bring 4x graphics boost to netbooks in 2013]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/valleyview1-1332499981.jpg" style="margin:4px" /></a></div>One of many reasons to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-delays-ivy-bridge-launch-june/"><em>still</em></a> be excited about Ivy Bridge is the integrated HD4000 graphics, which are zippy enough to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/fresh-ivy-bridge-benchmarks/">handle Skyrim</a> at modest settings. Desktoppers may not be so enthused if they stick to discrete GPUs anyway, but the potential for better graphics in cheaper, low-power mobile PCs is huge. That's why we're hyped to hear talk of a forthcoming 22nm "ValleyView" processor, described by Intel insider Jesse Barnes as a "CedarView-like chip but with an Ivy Bridge graphics core". That implies HD4000 may not only be destined for desktops, laptops and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/project-fiona-raises-the-stakes-for-gaming-tablets-packs-ivy-br/">Project Fionas</a>, but for future netbooks too. Meanwhile, leaked slides (shown above and after the break) from an outfit called Advantech spill more beans. Listed under a chipset codenamed "Balboa Pier", the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedar+trail">Cedar Trail</a> successor is described as fanless, packing "4x Gfx performance" compared to current PowerVR-equipped Atoms, and scheduled to arrive early next year. Will it be enough to bring netbooks back into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/is-samsung-giving-up-on-netbooks-next-year/">vogue</a>? It can't hurt.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel leaks: ValleyView chip could bring 4x graphics boost to netbooks in 2013</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/">Intel leaks: ValleyView chip could bring 4x graphics boost to netbooks in 2013</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20199549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/intel-leaks-valleyview-chip/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>22nm</category><category>advantech</category><category>balboa pier</category><category>BalboaPier</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>cedarview</category><category>hd 4000</category><category>Hd4000</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>jesse barnes</category><category>JesseBarnes</category><category>leak</category><category>roadmap</category><category>slides</category><category>valleyview</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/9-21-10-gputech11004.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> As usual, it seems like whenever a big chip company wants to keep those key details under wraps, someone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/04/leaked-amd-roadmap-reveals-next-gen-fusion-tablet-chips/">leaves</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">spreadsheet</a> lying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">in a bar</a>. Of course, the following information could be the product of a vengeful former employee mashing at a keyboard, so let's agree that these are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/RumorMill/">rumored</a> details until further notice. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidia/">NVIDIA's</a> whole range of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/06/nvidias-kepler-gpu-still-kinda-sorta-on-scheduled-for-2011-d/">Kepler-powered</a> graphics cards will be PCI-E 3.0 compliant, with the GTX690 topping the group at $999 when it arrives in Q3 of this year, while the modestly-priced GTX640 will retail for $139 when it arrives in May. If you'd like to drill down into the specifics of all eight cards purportedly on offer for 2012, we've got all the details in a handy chart nestled just after the interval.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/">NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler lineup revealed (possibly)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20165246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nvidia-kepler-roadmap-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>GeForce</category><category>GPU</category><category>Graphics</category><category>Graphics Card</category><category>GraphicsCard</category><category>Intel</category><category>Kepler</category><category>Leaked Roadmap</category><category>LeakedRoadmap</category><category>LenzFire</category><category>Lineup</category><category>NVIDIA</category><category>NVIDIA Kepler</category><category>NvidiaKepler</category><category>Radeon</category><category>Roadmap</category><category>Rumor</category><category>Rumor Mill</category><category>RumorMill</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel springs another leak, mobile Ivy Bridge CPUs abound]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/ivybridgem3.jpeg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Just yesterday, we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">caught a glimpse</a> of what Intel has in store for Ivy Bridge, and it seems those details were but a prelude to a bevy of details that leaked out today. It seems the folks over at VR Zone got their hands on some of Chipzilla's internal documents showing a host of changes for its post-Sandy Bridge mobile CPUs. Apparently, we can expect quite a few new full-power models, including a 2.9GHz Core i7-3920XM -- clocked at 200MHz faster than the Core i7-2960XM that's Intel's presiding mobile chipset champion -- along with two other quad-core Core i7s and a couple of Core i5 chips as well. For those who cherish battery life above all else, there's a dual-core Core i7-3667U clocked at 2.0 GHz and a 1.8GHz Core i5-3427U coming down the pipe. All the speedy new silicon comes with upgraded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/intel-ivy-bridge-gpu-to-support-4k-resolutions/">Intel HD graphics 4000</a>, and is slated for release in April and May of next year. If you can't wait until then for your next-gen CPU fix, head on over to the source for a heaping helping of Ivy Bridge charts and specs.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/">Intel springs another leak, mobile Ivy Bridge CPUs abound</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20122263/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>22nm</category><category>Core i7-3667U</category><category>Core i7-3920XM</category><category>CoreI7-3667u</category><category>CoreI7-3920xm</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpus</category><category>intel</category><category>intel HD graphics</category><category>intel hd graphics 4000</category><category>IntelHdGraphics</category><category>IntelHdGraphics4000</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>roadmap</category><category>roadmaps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel roadmap hints at Ivy Bridge's future]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intelivybridgeroadmap.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Considering how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/">frequently</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/">Intel</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">roadmaps</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/">leak</a> out, you have to wonder which super-spy is smuggling all those diplomatic bags out of Santa Clara. The latest seems to contain detailed plans for 2012's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-hypes-ivy-bridge-leaves-poor-old-sandy-in-its-wake/">Ivy Bridge</a> desktop chips (and the sad news that the release has been pushed back to Q2). There are no big surprises in the documents, since the company just shrunk some Sandy Bridge CPUs in the wash. Going down from a 32nm to 22nm microarchitecture has managed to wring 19 percent better power usage, which enabled Chipzilla to concentrate on beefing up the range's integrated graphics performance, making it (reportedly) 60 percent faster than its bigger brother. The chipset will sit neatly atop your current Sandy Bridge motherboards, (You'll just need to flash your BIOS), which is good because we're stuck with the <em>asthmatic, geriatric</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/intels-sandy-bridge-e-gets-rounded-up-and-reviewed-the-e-is-fo/">processor</a> for at least another few months.</div>
<div>
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">Leaked Intel roadmap hints at Ivy Bridge's future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20120723/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chipzilla</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i7</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CPU</category><category>CPUs</category><category>DesktopCpus</category><category>Directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>Intel</category><category>Ivy Bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>Leak</category><category>Leaked</category><category>Leaked Intel Roadmap</category><category>LeakedIntelRoadmap</category><category>Motherboard</category><category>Roadmap</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA's Jen-Hsun Huang: Windows on ARM should hit tablets first, battling Intel is a bad idea, would love his chips in iPad]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jen-hsun-huang-asiad2-1319172704.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
NVIDIA's founder and president Jen-Hsun Huang has never been one to dodge a question, and that made for an excellent closing interview here at AsiaD. Outside of (re)confirming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/">what lies ahead for Tegra</a>, he also spoke quite openly about his feeling towards Windows on ARM in response to a question from Joanna Stern. Here's the bulk of his reply:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		<em>"It's important for [Microsoft] not to position these as PCs. From a finesse perspective -- I can't speak on their behalf -- but I would come out with tablets first with Windows on ARM. It helps to establish that this isn't a PC. Will yesterday's Office run on tomorrow's Windows on ARM PC? Will a new version of Office run on tomorrow's Windows on ARM tablets? Both questions are about legacy, and both are about Office. The actual implementation of it is radically different. I see no reason to make Office 95 to run on Windows on ARM. I think it would be wonderful, absolutely wonderful -- I'd say, as someone who uses Windows -- it would be almost a requirement to me that [the ARM] device runs Windows interoperably. If Office runs on Windows on ARM -- it's the killer app. Everything else is on the web."</em></p>
</blockquote>
He elaborated to say that he would hope Office for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/08/editorial-windows-on-arm-is-a-big-deal-but-its-not-enough-to/">Windows on ARM</a> would support the same files that today's Office does, much the same way that Office for Mac eventually synced up with its Windows-based sibling. For more from Huang's interview, hop on past the break!<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA's Jen-Hsun Huang: Windows on ARM should hit tablets first, battling Intel is a bad idea, would love his chips in iPad</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/">NVIDIA's Jen-Hsun Huang: Windows on ARM should hit tablets first, battling Intel is a bad idea, would love his chips in iPad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20086935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidias-jen-hsun-huang-windows-on-arm-should-hit-tablets-first/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>apple</category><category>arm</category><category>asiad</category><category>asiad 2011</category><category>Asiad2011</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>intel</category><category>ipad</category><category>Jen-Hsun Huang</category><category>Jen-hsunHuang</category><category>Kal-El</category><category>Logan</category><category>nvidia</category><category>processing</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Stark</category><category>tegra</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>tegra 3</category><category>Tegra2</category><category>Tegra3</category><category>Wayne</category><category>windows</category><category>windows 7</category><category>windows 8</category><category>windows on arm</category><category>Windows7</category><category>Windows8</category><category>WindowsOnArm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA CEO confirms Tegra roadmap, building all now: Kal-El, Wayne, Logan, Stark]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/jen-hsun-huang-asiad-1319172309.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
NVIDIA's historically <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/nvidia-ceo-shoots-down-talk-of-intel-compatible-x86-chip-says-h/">outspoken</a> CEO, Mr. Jen-Hsun Huang, just took the stage here at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AsiaD/">AsiaD</a>, and among other things, he confirmed to Walt that the Tegra roadmap is well established, and in fact, the entire next-gen range is being produced (internally, of course) <em>right now</em>. That's Kal-El, Wayne, Logan and Stark, all codenamed after superheroes -- Superman, Batman, Wolverine and Ironman, in order of mention. In response to a question of if ASUS' Transformer Prime would be "the first Tegra 3-based product," Huang simply answered "probably."<br />
<br />
He continued by explaining that it generally takes around three years to build a new generation of Tegra: "We'd like to have a processor every year, and so we're building three in a row." Tegra 3 will end up being the world's first quad-core ARM processor (much like the Tegra 2 was the first dual-core), and he confirmed that NVIDIA has invested some $2 billion in Tegra alone. Finally, he confirmed that the inner workings we've heard about in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/nvidia-announces-project-denver-arm-cpu-for-the-desktop/">Project Denver</a> will first be present in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Tegra/">Tegra</a> line with the introduction of Stark -- a long ways out, but at least you've got something (else) to look forward to.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/">NVIDIA CEO confirms Tegra roadmap, building all now: Kal-El, Wayne, Logan, Stark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20086922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/21/nvidia-ceo-confirms-tegra-roadmap-building-all-now-kal-el-way/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>asiad</category><category>asiad 2011</category><category>Asiad2011</category><category>breaking news</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>intel</category><category>Jen-Hsun Huang</category><category>Jen-hsunHuang</category><category>Kal-El</category><category>Logan</category><category>nvidia</category><category>processing</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Stark</category><category>tegra</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>tegra 3</category><category>Tegra2</category><category>Tegra3</category><category>Wayne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Ivy Bridge coming Q1 2012, growing festive moss while you wait]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/ivy-bridge-newroadmap-1306783540.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If you were religiously awaiting the fruition of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/">last month's Intel leak</a>, brace yourself: we've got another one. Although Intel's updated roadmap hasn't changed anything per se, it does offer a few specifics. Whereas the previous schedule only suggested we'd be crossing the Ivy Bridge in the first half of 2012, the new roadmap shows the 22 nanometer processor penned in at the end of the first quarter. The Sandy Bridge E series is still on schedule for Q4 however, so unless you just <em>have</em> to have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/">native USB 3.0</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/">DirectX 11</a> support, you still have plenty to look forward to. Otherwise, we'll see you in April.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/">Intel's Ivy Bridge coming Q1 2012, growing festive moss while you wait</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 May 2011 17:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19953626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intels-ivy-bridge-coming-q1-2012-growing-festive-moss-while-yo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>22nm</category><category>compatibility</category><category>dates</category><category>directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>graphics</category><category>intel</category><category>intel roadmap</category><category>intel roadmap 2011</category><category>IntelRoadmap</category><category>IntelRoadmap2011</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>leaks</category><category>plans</category><category>R</category><category>roadmap</category><category>roadmap 2011</category><category>Roadmap2011</category><category>support</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel goes ULV for laptops to combat the oncoming tablet horde]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/"><img alt="Intel CPU" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/5-20-2011intel.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a>Intel has been talking up its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/">x86-powered smartphones</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/next-next-gen-atom-will-be-a-system-on-a-chip-called-silvermont/">battery-sipping Atoms</a> for tablets quite a bit recently, but the company hasn't forgotten its roots in traditional PC form-factors. At an investor event in San Francisco, CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/paul+otellini/">Paul Otellini</a> announced a significant change to its line of notebook CPUs -- ultra low voltage will be the new norm, not just a niche chip for high-end ultra-portables. The baseline TDP for future CPUs will be in the 10 to 15 watt range, a huge drop from the 35w design of the mainstream Core line and lower than even current-gen ULV chips (which bottom out at 17w). The company also plans to make NVIDIA <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">eat its words</a> by putting the pedal to the metal on die shrinks -- releasing a 22nm Atom next year followed by a 14nm version in 2013. That <em>could</em> mean our fantasy of true all-day battery life in a sleek and sexy laptop will finally come true. Don't crush our dreams Intel!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/">Intel goes ULV for laptops to combat the oncoming tablet horde</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 May 2011 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19945778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nm</category><category>22nm</category><category>atom</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpus</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>moores law</category><category>MooresLaw</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>ultra-low voltage</category><category>Ultra-lowVoltage</category><category>ulv</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel admits Apple 'helps shape' its roadmap, keeps foot lodged firmly in mouth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x05191222.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
We knew Intel and Apple had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/26/exclusive-apple-dictated-light-peak-creation-to-intel-could-be/">a close working relationship</a> when it came to developing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/apple-unveils-thunderbolt/">Thunderbolt</a>, but now an exec from Santa Clara has taken the declarations of mutual admiration to the next level. Tom Kilroy, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Sales and Marketing Group, told a <em>Reuters</em> tech summit that Apple isn't merely important to his company's plans, it actually "helps shape [Intel's] roadmap." Those are strong words coming from the world's biggest maker of processor chips, one that you wouldn't expect to be beholden to any hardware or software partner. Additionally, it marks the second time this week that Intel has indirectly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/microsoft-rebuts-intels-claims-about-windows-8-calls-them-fac/">slighted Microsoft</a>, the first one being a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/intel-vp-confirms-arm-versions-of-windows-8-will-offer-no-compat/">damning analysis</a> of Windows 8 on ARM by fellow Intel SVP Renee James. It'd be easy to conclude that we're seeing cracks developing in the old Wintel bond, but we reckon it's more likely that Chipzilla is simply finding the wrong words to express otherwise benign thoughts. Hit the source link for more from Mr. Kilroy.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/">Intel admits Apple 'helps shape' its roadmap, keeps foot lodged firmly in mouth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 19 May 2011 07:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19944695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/intel-admits-apple-helps-shape-its-roadmap-keeps-foot-lodged/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>components</category><category>cpu</category><category>development</category><category>future</category><category>hardware</category><category>intel</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>quote</category><category>quoted</category><category>roadmap</category><category>senior vp</category><category>SeniorVp</category><category>svp</category><category>tom kilroy</category><category>TomKilroy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 07:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell's 10-inch Android and Windows tablets get names, specs, release dates]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/4-23-2011leakeddell-tablets.jpg" alt="leaked Dell tablets" /></a></div>
Well, well, what have we here? A pair of 10-inch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dell">Dell</a> tablets, one running Windows 7 on those fancy new Oak Trail chips from Intel and the other pushing Android 3.0 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/23/1-2ghz-tegra-2-3d-chips-suggested-by-leaked-slide-coming-sprin/">with a Tegra T25</a>. We already saw these devices <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/dells-2011-smartphone-and-tablet-lineup-leaked-android-ice-cre/">leaked in February</a>, but now we have some specs and release dates. The Wintel powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/05/dells-10-inch-windows-7-tablet-staying-hidden-until-fall/">Latitude ST</a> boasts a resolution of 1366 x 768, 2GB of RAM, up to a 128GB SSD, GPS, an accelerometer, both front- and rear-facing cameras, an 8-hour <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/dell-rosemount-tablet-will-have-intels-oak-trail-inside-stylus/">removable battery</a>, and "1080p video output," which we assume means HDMI-out. The Android-flavored <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/dell-streak-10-will-run-honeycomb-may-share-a-body-with-windows/">Streak Pro</a> opts for a 1200 x 800 panel, but keeps the pair of cameras (and two mics) for video chats, while adding an unspecified mobile broadband radio and slathering Dell's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/stageui">Stage UI</a> on top of Honeycomb (whether or not that's a good thing is purely a matter of taste). Pricing is still up in the air, but the leaked roadmap indicates the Streak Pro will land in June, followed by the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/08/dell-latitude-xt3-convertible-tablet-hands-on-video/">Latitude XT3</a> convertible tablet in July, and the Latitude ST in October.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/">Dell's 10-inch Android and Windows tablets get names, specs, release dates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19921935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/23/dells-10-inch-android-and-windows-tablets-get-names-specs-rel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>atom</category><category>dell</category><category>dell streak</category><category>DellStreak</category><category>gallo</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>intel</category><category>latitude st</category><category>LatitudeSt</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>leaks</category><category>nvidia</category><category>oak trail</category><category>OakTrail</category><category>roadmap</category><category>roadmaps</category><category>rosemount</category><category>stage</category><category>stage ui</category><category>StageUi</category><category>streak</category><category>streak 10</category><category>streak pro</category><category>Streak10</category><category>StreakPro</category><category>T25</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>Tegra T25</category><category>Tegra2</category><category>TegraT25</category><category>windows</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel to support USB 3.0 alongside Thunderbolt, coming with Ivy Bridge in 2012]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11x04140819.jpg" /></a></div>
We were just pondering this very thing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/">yesterday</a> -- would Intel dedicate itself to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/intel-thunderbolt-a-closer-look/">Thunderbolt</a> and give USB 3.0 the cold shoulder -- and now we have our answer from the Santa Clara crew, albeit delivered from Beijing. The Chinese capital is the site of Intel's currently ongoing developer conference, which is where Kirk Skaugen, VP of the company's Architecture Group, assured the world that the promise for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/intel-promises-native-usb-3-0-support-someday/">native USB 3.0 support</a> in Intel chipsets will be fulfilled. Not this year, mind you, but it'll be with us in 2012 as part of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/">Ivy Bridge</a> CPU refresh. That matches AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/amd-beats-intel-to-the-punch-confirms-usb-3-0-support-in-future/">plans</a> to support USB 3.0 in Fusion APUs, and was augmented with a strong word of endorsement from Skaugen about the connector's future. He urged developers to embrace USB 3.0 on an equal footing with Intel's proprietary Thunderbolt interconnect, describing the two technologies as "complementary." If you say so, captain.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/">Intel to support USB 3.0 alongside Thunderbolt, coming with Ivy Bridge in 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19912658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/14/intel-to-support-usb-3-0-alongside-thunderbolt-coming-with-ivy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accessories</category><category>architecture</category><category>beijing</category><category>chipset</category><category>complementary</category><category>confirmed</category><category>connectivity</category><category>hardware</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel Developer Conference</category><category>IntelDeveloperConference</category><category>interconnect</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>official</category><category>pc</category><category>peripherals</category><category>plans</category><category>platform</category><category>roadmap</category><category>schedule</category><category>superspeed</category><category>support</category><category>usb</category><category>usb 3</category><category>usb 3.0</category><category>Usb3</category><category>Usb3.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Thunderbolt dev kits coming this quarter, hopefully ushering in more 10Gbps-capable devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11x04130917intt.jpg" /></a></div>
Intel has just announced it will soon be making development kits available for its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/intel-thunderbolt-a-closer-look/">Thunderbolt</a> interconnect. The cable that can carry 10Gbps (in both directions!) has so far only seen itself installed in Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/apple-refreshes-macbook-pro-family-with-sandy-bridge-processors/">MacBook Pro</a> computers, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/g-technology-crashes-nab-with-portable-thunderbolt-equipped-rai/">storage</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/matrox-strikes-at-nab-first-to-market-with-thunderbolt-products/">other</a> peripheral manufacturers are starting to unveil their lightning-scorched offerings this week at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nab2011">NAB</a> and this announcement is sure to give Thunderbolt an extra spur of momentum. What's going to be intriguing going forward is to see whether manufacturers take it up <em>instead of</em> USB 3.0 or install the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/24/apple-unveils-thunderbolt/">DisplayPort lookalike</a> alongside the latest and greatest from the USB camp. If you ask us, we can never have enough high-speed interconnects... how does SuperSpeed Thunderbolt sound?<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Thunderbolt dev kits coming this quarter, hopefully ushering in more 10Gbps-capable devices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/">Intel Thunderbolt dev kits coming this quarter, hopefully ushering in more 10Gbps-capable devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19911351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/intel-thunderbolt-dev-kits-coming-this-quarter-hopefully-usheri/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>connectivity</category><category>connector</category><category>dev kit</category><category>developer kit</category><category>DeveloperKit</category><category>DevKit</category><category>intel</category><category>intel light peak</category><category>intel thunderbolt</category><category>IntelLightPeak</category><category>IntelThunderbolt</category><category>interface</category><category>light peak</category><category>LightPeak</category><category>plans</category><category>roadmap</category><category>schedule</category><category>thunderbolt</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Roadmap charts rollout dates for Ivy Bridge, Cedarview, Sandy Bridge E-series]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roabmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/2011-intel-roadmap.jpg" /></a></div>
What's that? You can't get enough of Intel? Well, it's your lucky day, because we just got our hands on the chip maker's roadmap for 2011 and 2012. According to the leaked slides, we can expect to see the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/31/intels-of-intels-x79-chipset-exposed-14-usb-2-0-ports-but-not/">Sandy Bridge E-series</a> in Q4 of 2011. Alternately, the 22nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/">Ivy Bridge</a> is slated for a somewhat less specific release in the first half of 2012. We're also likely to see the new Pentium and Celeron-based Sandy Bridge models in Q3 this year, and the Atom-equipped <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/">Cedarview</a> in Q4. The roadmap's also giving us a rather vague look at pricing for the chipsets, and from what we gather, we can expect the E-series to sport a hefty price tag and Cedarview to bring the value. If that's not enough to sate that animal appetite for Intel news, you can hit the source link for more roadmap goodness.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/">Intel Roadmap charts rollout dates for Ivy Bridge, Cedarview, Sandy Bridge E-series</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19910960/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intel-roadmap-charts-rollout-dates-for-ivy-bridge-cedarview-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cedar view</category><category>CedarView</category><category>dates</category><category>intel</category><category>intel roadmap</category><category>intel roadmap 2011</category><category>IntelRoadmap</category><category>IntelRoadmap2011</category><category>Ivy Bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>price</category><category>pricing</category><category>reoadmap 2012</category><category>Reoadmap2012</category><category>roadmap</category><category>roadmap 2011</category><category>Roadmap2011</category><category>sandy bridge e</category><category>sandy bridge-e</category><category>SandyBridge-e</category><category>SandyBridgeE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Trout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Acer building Sandy Bridge tablets for Android, will use them to 'phase out' netbooks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x011835gacer.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
You'd be forgiven for expecting that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/acer-iconia-tab-a500-first-hands-on/">dual-core Tegra 2</a> that swept all before it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/ces2011,tegra2">at CES</a> would be the king of tablet processors for a good while, but Acer is already plotting ways to overthrow it. Admittedly, Acer is kind of cheating by jumping into x86 land and snatching some unspecified <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/">Intel Sandy Bridge</a> silicon, but are you really going to complain about getting multi-core grunt under the hood of your well-lubricated Android machine? An official from the company has promised two to three new tablets, sized at either 7 or 10 inches diagonally, for the first half of this year -- a tasty morsel of information, which he garnishes with the forecast that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/netbook">netbooks</a> will eventually be phased out in favor of such touchy-feely slate devices. If you can fit a full second-gen Core CPU inside a tablet, why the heck not?<br />
<br />
<strong>Updated</strong>: Acer's US team has clarified for us that the Android tablets <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/23/acers-android-tablets-hands-on/">it announced in November</a> are still set to hit in April. Obviously, these Sandy Bridge versions would be farther off, but we've also heard from another source that Acer would likely wait for Intel's ULV-based Sandy Bridge processors, which aren't due until the spring / summer timeframe. We'll let you know if we hear more.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/">Acer building Sandy Bridge tablets for Android, will use them to 'phase out' netbooks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19804793/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-inch</category><category>2011</category><category>7-inch</category><category>acer</category><category>android</category><category>core 2011</category><category>Core2011</category><category>intel</category><category>plans</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>schedule</category><category>slate</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>taiwan</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's next CPU refresh will include DirectX 11 graphics support]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x0107ub7jdb88df.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Tick, the CPU and GPU get <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/03/intels-2nd-generation-core-processor-family-announced-includes/">integrated into the same 32nm die</a>, tock, they both go down to 22nm with the latter gaining DirectX 11 support. Intel's only just unveiled its Sandy Bridge processors, but the next update to the company's desktop and laptop hardware has already gained an important detail. Mooly Eden, general manager for the PC Client Group, has disclosed the news that Ivy Bridge -- the die shrink of the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture -- will include DX 11 graphical capabilities when it arrives late in 2011. We're inclined to agree with Intel that DirectX 11 really wasn't a necessary implementation for Sandy Bridge given its humble gaming credentials, but Mooly expects a lot more applications will have harnessed the available APIs by the time we come to cross the Ivy Bridge. Let's hope it is so.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/">Intel's next CPU refresh will include DirectX 11 graphics support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19792542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/intels-next-cpu-refresh-will-include-directx-11-graphics-suppor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>22nm</category><category>compatibility</category><category>directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>graphics</category><category>intel</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>mooly eden</category><category>MoolyEden</category><category>plans</category><category>roadmap</category><category>support</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 to bring 200 PCs combining GeForce GPUs and Sandy Bridge, first laptops to be quad-core]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/10x1216b3hbdkj6.jpg" /></a>What's NVIDIA got up its sleeve for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/ces2011">CES</a>, you ask? A whole host of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a> laptop and desktop machines, by the sound of its latest press release. The green giant of graphics has proudly announced a new record of 200 OEM design wins for Intel's incoming CPUs. The big draw of Sandy Bridge is that it's the first processor to include an integrated GPU embedded directly within its die, which is projected to improve power efficiency and overall performance -- though clearly it hasn't been impressive enough to get PC vendors to abandon discrete graphics chips. If anything, they seem to be going in the other direction and <em>insisting</em> on a discrete GPU as well.<br />
<br />
In other news, whether with or without NVIDIA's help, the first Sandy Bridge laptops will feature quad-core parts. Such is the word directly from Intel, with one insider adding that the dual-core debutants will get their chance a month after CES, around the middle of February. Skip past the break for NVIDIA's boastful PR or hit the source for more on Intel's plans. <br type="_moz" /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2011 to bring 200 PCs combining GeForce GPUs and Sandy Bridge, first laptops to be quad-core</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/">2011 to bring 200 PCs combining GeForce GPUs and Sandy Bridge, first laptops to be quad-core</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19766579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/2011-to-bring-200-pcs-combining-geforce-gpus-and-sandy-bridge-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ces</category><category>ces 2011</category><category>Ces2011</category><category>core 2011</category><category>Core2011</category><category>cpu</category><category>design wins</category><category>DesignWins</category><category>discrete gpu</category><category>discrete graphics</category><category>DiscreteGpu</category><category>DiscreteGraphics</category><category>gfx</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop gpu</category><category>LaptopGpu</category><category>laptops</category><category>mobile gpu</category><category>mobile graphics</category><category>MobileGpu</category><category>MobileGraphics</category><category>nvidia</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>quad-core</category><category>record</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>schedule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple to rely on Intel's Sandy Bridge graphics in future MacBooks, AMD GPUs in MacBook Pros?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/10x1209o43tgdgf.jpg" /></a>Apple will use Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a> CPUs in its future laptops, no surprises there, but what's interesting about these forthcoming machines is that some of them might rely <em>solely</em> on Intel's chip for both general and graphical processing tasks. That's the word from the usual "sources familiar with Apple's plans," who expect "MacBook models with screen sizes of 13 inches and below" to eschew the inclusion of a discrete GPU and ride their luck on the improved graphical performance of Intel's upcoming do-it-all chip. There are currently no sub-13.3-inch MacBooks, so the suggestion of one is surely intriguing, but the major point here seems to be that NVIDIA's being left out of the Apple party, because MacBook Pros are also predicted to switch up to AMD-provided graphics hardware. All these changes should be taking place with Apple's next refresh, which is naturally expected at some point in the new year. Although, as <em>CNET</em> points out, this could all be just a massive negotiating ploy to get NVIDIA to play nicer with its pricing, we're inclined to believe Intel has finally gotten its integrated graphics up to a level where it pleases the discerning tastemakers at Apple.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/">Apple to rely on Intel's Sandy Bridge graphics in future MacBooks, AMD GPUs in MacBook Pros?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19753355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/apple-to-rely-on-intels-sandy-bridge-graphics-in-future-macbook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>apple</category><category>chip</category><category>core 2011</category><category>Core2011</category><category>cpu</category><category>future</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>hardware</category><category>integrated</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>low-end</category><category>macbook</category><category>macbook pro</category><category>MacbookPro</category><category>mobile graphics</category><category>MobileGraphics</category><category>nvidia</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>radeon</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Light Peak on track for release in first half of 2011?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/10x1104oub24fcf.jpg" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/intel-unveils-light-peak-10gbps-optical-interconnect-for-mobile/">10Gbps</a>. In both directions. At the same time. That's been the tantalizing promise of Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/lightpeak">Light Peak</a> optical interconnect, and now we're hearing its penchant for speed is overflowing into the company's roadmap. <em>CNET</em> cites a source familiar with developments behind the scenes in reporting that Light Peak is expected to arrive in the early part of next year, slightly accelerating the already known plans for delivering the technology <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/intel-says-light-peak-coming-next-year-can-and-will-coexist-wit/">at some point</a> in 2011. We've already been graced with a set of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/14/intels-light-peak-optical-interconnect-shrinks-slightly-while/">Light Peak-enabled prototypes</a>, so you could've guessed things were gathering pace, but it's always good to get the odd bit of anonymous confirmation that things are moving along swiftly. And hey, when Light Peak hardware finally drops, we can just switch gears and start salivating over improvements that'll <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/04/intel-demonstrates-light-peak-on-a-laptop-says-10gbps-speeds-ar/">lift that 10Gbps ceiling</a> even further.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/">Intel Light Peak on track for release in first half of 2011?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19702514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/intel-light-peak-on-track-for-release-in-first-half-of-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10gbps</category><category>bandwidth</category><category>future</category><category>intel</category><category>intel light peak</category><category>IntelLightPeak</category><category>intercoonect</category><category>light peak</category><category>LightPeak</category><category>optical</category><category>optical interconnect</category><category>OpticalInterconnect</category><category>plans</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>schedule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel may finally be ready to embrace USB 3.0]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/10x0907ihb23ewfd.jpg" /></a></div>
It's September so that can mean only one thing in Intel land: IDF. The second of this year's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/13/meego-gone-wild-features-detailed-companies-come-on-board-at-i/">Intel Developer Forums</a> is this year preceded by speculation that the big blue giant's next motherboard reference design -- codenamed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/">Cougar Point</a> -- will include USB 3.0 support. Intel's relationship with the 3.0 interconnect standard can at best be described as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/nvidia-confirms-intel-chipsets-wont-support-usb-3-0-until-2011/">strained</a>, but motherboard and laptop makers haven't shied from integrating it into their wares and as the number of devices supporting SuperSpeed increases, it's becoming somewhat inevitable that Intel would have to play ball as well. At least until <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/lightpeak">Light Peak</a> shines its "instant obsolescence" ray onto USB cables <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/intel-says-light-peak-coming-next-year-can-and-will-coexist-wit/">next year</a>. Then again, bear in mind China's <em>Commercial Times</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/23/commercial-times-palm-smartphones-delayed-to-end-of-year/">has been wrong before</a>, so let's not credit this as fact until someone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/07/video-intel-we-are-rock-stars/">with a blue name badge</a> tells us so.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/">Intel may finally be ready to embrace USB 3.0</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19623147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/intel-may-finally-be-ready-to-embrace-usb-3-0/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>commercial times</category><category>CommercialTimes</category><category>connectivity</category><category>cougar point</category><category>CougarPoint</category><category>host controller</category><category>HostController</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2010</category><category>Idf2010</category><category>intel</category><category>intel cougar point</category><category>IntelCougarPoint</category><category>interconnect</category><category>plans</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>speculation</category><category>usb</category><category>usb 3.0</category><category>usb controller</category><category>usb host</category><category>Usb3.0</category><category>UsbController</category><category>UsbHost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel roadmap details Sandy Bridge CPUs, expands SSD lineup?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-solid-st/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/8-14-10-ssds.jpg" /></a></div>
If a set of supposedly leaked slides are legitimate (and they sure look convincing to us) then the shape of Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/">dirt-brown 2011 plans</a> has finally been revealed. As you can see immediately above, Chipzilla's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/03/intel-swings-25nm-factory-doors-open-for-a-tour-de-fab/">25nm flash process</a> is just about ready to double the size of the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/x25-m">award-winning consumer SSDs</a>, bring up to 400GB of "enterprise-grade" multi-level cell memory to the enterprise space, and create a series of netbook-sized <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mini-sata/">mini-SATA drives</a> with the remains of the 34nm silicon.<br />
<br />
On the processor front things are a little more iffy, but it seems safe to say that the naming scheme has changed, as the silicon wafers you'll slot into a Q67 Express motherboard will have an extra digit (and often a letter) affixed to the end. Instead of a Core i7-870, you'll see the likes of Core i7-2600, i7-2600S, i7-2600K and i5-2500T, with the K (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-core-i7-875k-and-core-i5-655k-unlock-multipliers-better-p/">as in the past</a>) affording you an unlocked multiplier for overclocking and the S equaling reduced power consumption, or vastly reduced for the T models. German publication <em>ComputerBase</em> -- which found and subsequently pulled the slides -- somehow managed to dig up nearly full specs for desktop and laptop CPUs as well, and though we can't verify their legitimacy, you're welcome to marvel at the idea of a 3.5GHz processor running on just 35 watts by visiting the source link below. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-allegedly-leaked-product-roadmap-for-2011/">Intel's alleged leaked product roadmap for 2011</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-allegedly-leaked-product-roadmap-for-2011/#3261487"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/8-14-10-ssds800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-allegedly-leaked-product-roadmap-for-2011/#3261485"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/8-14-10-desktops800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-allegedly-leaked-product-roadmap-for-2011/#3261486"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/8-14-10-mobile800_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Thanks, Aristo]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/">Leaked Intel roadmap details Sandy Bridge CPUs, expands SSD lineup?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19593842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/14/leaked-intel-roadmap-details-sandy-bridge-cpus-expands-ssd-line/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cougar Point</category><category>CougarPoint</category><category>cpu</category><category>CPUs</category><category>Intel</category><category>lyndonville</category><category>postville</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>soda creek</category><category>SodaCreek</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state storage</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateStorage</category><category>SSD</category><category>X25-E</category><category>X25-M</category><category>X25-V</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0714oub245advvx.jpg" /></a></div>
Right now, Intel has every right to lay contentedly atop the laurels of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/intel-has-its-best-quarter-ever-brings-in-2-9b-profit/">its biggest quarterly profit ever</a>, but that's not what the company is doing at all. Instead of protracting the life of its current-gen processors unduly, Intel is planning to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-briefly-demos-next-gen-sandy-bridge-laptop-platform-at-com/"><em>accelerate</em></a> the roadmap for its next generation of multicore parts, codenamed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a>. The difference between the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Nehalem-based stuff</a> we have today and the upcoming chip is that the Sandy Bridge architecture takes everything down to 32nm -- including the graphics processor and memory controller which are built at 45nm at present -- while keeping it all within the same enclosure. Enthusiastic feedback from customers who were given tasters of the Sandy stuff has been to blame for this haste on Intel's part, and we're told that with additional investment in 32nm infrastructure, the chip giant plans to make deliveries late this year. That in turn could potentially result in some eager vendor pushing a Sandy Bridge laptop or desktop out before 2010 is through -- which would be all kinds of nice.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/">Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19553624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>ceo</category><category>chips</category><category>cpu</category><category>forecast</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>schedule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel roadmap reveals six new notebook CPUs for 2010, better battery life in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-processor-timing600-1275252656.jpg" /></a></div>
We love the smell of silicon in the morning -- especially when it emanates from one of Intel's legendary leaked roadmaps. Today, we've stumbled across one with specs for Chipzilla's entire fall collection of mobile chips, and a couple new details about that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandy+bridge">desiccated overpass</a> the execs keep talking about. First up, it appears sources were spot-on about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intels-quad-core-i7-740qm-and-i7-840qm-show-up-on-dell-laptop-m/">Core i7s</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/">Core i5s</a> we heard about last week, but the 2.66GHz / 3.33 GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/core+i5-580m/">Core i5-580M</a> won't be the only dual-core CPU to look for in Q4; it will be sandwiched between the 2.8GHz Core i7-640M (which turbos to 3.46GHz) and the 2.66GHz / 3.2GHz Core i5-560M -- all of which peak at a conservative 35 watts.<br />
<br />
True juice sippers will want a 15W <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CULV/">CULV</a>, however, and it seems more of those exist than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-officially-outs-core-i3-i5-and-i7-ulv-processors-for-thos/">Intel initially let on</a>; Q4 will see a high-end Core i7-680UM that starts at 1.46GHz and turbos up to 2.53GHz and a 1.33GHz / 2.13GHz Core i5-560UM, plus a 25W 2.26GHz Core i7-660LM low-voltage chip will also join the fray. All these new dual-cores will have on-die Intel HD Graphics in one form or another, but all are also stopgaps until Intel's 32nm "Huron River" platform debuts in the first quarter of 2011. Then, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/14/intels-huron-river-32nm-laptop-platform-to-pack-wimax-in-2011/">we'll get WiMAX, WiDi and Intel Bluetooth</a> alongside an intriguing new concept dubbed Zero Power ODD, which promises a power-saving sleep mode for our noisy optical disc drives (see more coverage link) and the promise of enough battery life to play two full Blu-rays on a single charge. Don't believe us? See the slides below for more. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/">Intel's leaked mobile roadmap, Q4 2010</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/#3025734"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-intel07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/#3025735"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-intel08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/#3025732"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-intel05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/#3025733"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-intel06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-leaked-mobile-roadmap-q4-2010/#3025730"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/5-30-10-intel03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/">Leaked Intel roadmap reveals six new notebook CPUs for 2010, better battery life in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 30 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19497068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/30/leaked-intel-roadmap-reveals-six-new-notebook-cpus-for-2010-bet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battery life</category><category>BatteryLife</category><category>Blu-ray</category><category>Core 2010</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i5-560M</category><category>Core i5-560UM</category><category>Core i5-580M</category><category>Core i7</category><category>Core i7-640M</category><category>Core i7-660LM</category><category>Core i7-680UM</category><category>Core2010</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-560m</category><category>CoreI5-560um</category><category>CoreI5-580m</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-640m</category><category>CoreI7-660lm</category><category>CoreI7-680um</category><category>Cougar Point</category><category>CougarPoint</category><category>CULV</category><category>Huron River</category><category>HuronRiver</category><category>I5-560M</category><category>i5-560UM</category><category>i5-580M</category><category>i7-640M</category><category>i7-660LM</category><category>i7-680UM</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Core i5</category><category>Intel Core i7</category><category>Intel HD</category><category>intel hd graphics</category><category>Intel roadmap</category><category>IntelCoreI5</category><category>IntelCoreI7</category><category>IntelHd</category><category>IntelHdGraphics</category><category>IntelRoadmap</category><category>low voltage</category><category>LowVoltage</category><category>roadmap</category><category>roadmaps</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>ultra low voltage</category><category>UltraLowVoltage</category><category>ULV</category><category>WiDi</category><category>WiMAX</category><category>Zero Power ODD</category><category>ZeroPowerOdd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Core i5-580M speeding toward a fall release at 2.66GHz?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="left" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0524boj124.jpg"  alt="" /></a>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/23/msis-customizable-gx640-gaming-notebook-now-shipping/">Core i5-540M</a> is still quite rare on the ground, but we're hearing word that Intel is already prepping the assembly line for its successor. A new Core i5-580M has been dug up by the sleuths at <em>Notebook Italia</em>, who say it'll run at a default 2.66GHz and ramp up to 3.33GHz via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Turbo Boost</a> when needed. Those numbers compare favorably to the 2.53GHz and 3.06GHz of the 540M, and if Intel and company get their timing right,the 580M should be stealing some of that Core i7 thunder just in time for the back to school shopping rush. Won't hear any complaining from us if that turns out to be the case.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/">Intel Core i5-580M speeding toward a fall release at 2.66GHz?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 24 May 2010 04:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19488538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/24/intel-core-i5-580m-speeding-toward-a-fall-release-at-2-66ghz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>arrandale</category><category>core 2010</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-540m</category><category>core i5-580</category><category>core i5-580m</category><category>Core2010</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-540m</category><category>CoreI5-580</category><category>CoreI5-580m</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpu roadmap</category><category>CpuRoadmap</category><category>hardware</category><category>intel</category><category>intel core i5-580</category><category>IntelCoreI5-580</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptop cpu</category><category>LaptopCpu</category><category>laptops</category><category>mobile cpu</category><category>MobileCpu</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>refresh</category><category>roadmap</category><category>schedule</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><category>update</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 04:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/151104/2010/05/westmereex.html?lsrc=rss_main"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0507m3ubweintel.jpg" /></a></div>
Yeah yeah, "more cores and faster speeds," you've heard it all before right? That'd be our reaction too if we weren't talking about the successor to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Nehalem-Ex</a>, Intel's most gruesomely overpowered chip to date. Launched under the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> branding in March, it represents Intel's single biggest generational leap so far, and with its eight cores, sixteen threads, and 24MB of shared onboard cache, you could probably see why. Time waits for no CPU though, and Intel's planned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/intel-begins-production-of-32nm-westmere-processors/">32nm</a> Westmere-Ex successor will move things forward with an unspecified increase in both core count (speculated to be jumping up to 12) and operating frequencies, while keeping within the same power envelope. Given the current 2.26GHz default speed and 2.66GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turbo+boost">Turbo Boost</a> option of the 7500, that means we're probably looking at a 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz <em>12-core</em>, hyper-threaded processor, scheduled to land at some point next year. Time to make some apps that can use all that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">parallel processing</a> power, nay?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/">Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19468433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>eight-core</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>multicore</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>parallel processing</category><category>ParallelProcessing</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>professional</category><category>roadmap</category><category>servers</category><category>superfast</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere-ex</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3733"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/4feb10intel935b.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The 32nm dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Clarkdale processors</a> that recently made <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/intel-core-i5-and-core-i3-desktop-parts-start-shipping/">their debut</a> are about to pave the way for Intel's next performance crown chaser, the six-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/gulftown">Gulftown</a>. You might've known that already, but Intel's decided to furnish us with the above slide detailing the particular differences between the two dies, with the most notable being the whopping 1.17 <em>billion</em> transistors that the new CPU will be composed of. The major attraction of Clarkdale chips lies in their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/intels-32mn-processors-show-off-power-efficiency-in-informal-pr/">power efficiency</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/intel-gma-hd-graphics-review-deems-them-excellent-for-video-med/">competent integrated GPU</a>, but the Gulftown focus will be firmly on the high end. Hence, there's no integrated graphics, but the built-in memory controller supports three channels of DDR3 RAM and even plays nice with lower-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/01/samsungs-30nm-ddr3-dram-set-to-lower-costs-and-power-consumptio/">1.35-volt sticks</a>. There's also confirmation that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/29/amd-and-intels-six-core-cpu-plans-revealed-by-mobo-makers/">forthcoming</a> hex-core chip will fit inside the familiar LGA-1366 socket, so if you bought a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/02/maingear-unveils-core-i7-packin-shift-your-own-personal-super/">high end Core i7</a>, worry not, you'll be able to replace your still blisteringly quick CPU with an even faster beast. Quad-core variants -- by virtue of disabling a pair of cores -- are on the cards as well, while Intel also took the opportunity to delve into questions of 1Tbps+ bandwidth interconnects and its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/11/intel-demonstrates-80-core-processor/">80-core processor project</a>, but you'll have to hit up the links below to learn more about those.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/">Intel teases six-core Gulftown, discusses tera-scale computing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19344464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/intel-teases-six-core-gulftown-discusses-tera-scale-computing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cache</category><category>clarkdale</category><category>core i</category><category>CoreI</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>gulftown</category><category>hex-core</category><category>intel</category><category>l3 cache</category><category>L3Cache</category><category>lga-1366</category><category>power gate</category><category>power gating</category><category>PowerGate</category><category>PowerGating</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>quad-core</category><category>roadmap</category><category>six-core</category><category>tera-scale</category><category>tera-scale computing</category><category>Tera-scaleComputing</category><category>westmere</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's desktop roadmap leaked, with faster i5 and i7, introduction of i3]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fpc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fdocs%2Fcolumn%2Fkaigai%2F20091127_331818.html&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-chart-2009-1.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Just when you thought you had enough gigahertz in your life, along come the folks at <em>Impress</em> to blow the doors off Intel's upcoming crop of desktop processors. In the highly detailed charts there's wild talk of a low-powered "S" version of Core i5 that lowers the chip from 95W to 82W, a new Core i3 line that strips out the Turbo Boost technology and dips into budget-priced territory, and word that at the time of this roadmap at least the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/early-core-i9-benchmarks-promising-make-you-wonder-why-you-even/">Core i9 "Gulftown" chip</a> isn't slated for until Q2 of next year. We could probably bore you all day with the details, so hit up the source link for all the sordid details before we get ourselves too worked up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/">Intel's desktop roadmap leaked, with faster i5 and i7, introduction of i3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19256980/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/29/intels-desktop-roadmap-leaked-with-faster-i5-and-i7-introduct/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>core i3</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i9</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI9</category><category>intel</category><category>leak</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Cedarview Atom chip rumored to go 32nm in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16512/41/"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="16" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/ztom-zxx-chip-thu.jpg"  alt="" /></a>We know you aren't <em>publicly </em>keeping count, but considering that you're carefully watching process technology numbers in the depths of your <strike>mom's</strike> basement, we felt it prudent to pass along the latest juicy nugget from the folks at <i>Fudzilla</i>. According to raisins in their grapevine, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a> is gunning for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/32nm/">32nm</a> Atom chip in 2011, with the codename of the CPU being Cedarview and the name of the platform being Cedar Trail. If you'll recall, we recently heard that Pineview was expected to be formally unveiled in a slew of machines come January, but we're already anxious for Cedarview's DDR3 support and fresh, sun-ripened scent. Oh, and support for Blu-ray playback, too.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/">Intel's Cedarview Atom chip rumored to go 32nm in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19249474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>Atom</category><category>bloomfield</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>cedar view</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>CedarView</category><category>ddr2</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>pineview</category><category>platform</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Arrandale chips detailed, priced and dated?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091112PD202.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/nov12odsfihladwr4-1258028929.jpg" alt="" /></a>Who's up for some more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel,roadmap">Intel roadmap</a> rumoring? The latest scuttlebutt from "notebook players" over in the far East is that the chip giant has finally settled on names, speeds, and prices for its first three Arrandale CPUs, which are expected to arrive in the first half of 2010. The Core i5-520UM and Core i7-620UM both run at 1.06GHz, while the top Core i7-640UM model speeds ahead at 1.2GHz, with bulk-buying prices of $241, $278, and $305 per unit of each processor. Even if the processing speeds might not impress on paper, these 32nm chips splice two processing cores, the memory controller, and graphics engine all into the same package and thereby deliver <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/intels-32mn-processors-show-off-power-efficiency-in-informal-pr/">major power savings</a>. Platform pricing is expected to remain at around $500 for netbooks, while the ultrathins these chips are intended for should hit the $600 to $800 range... if Lord Intel wills it so.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/">Intel Arrandale chips detailed, priced and dated?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19234434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/intel-arrandale-chips-detailed-priced-and-dated/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arrandale</category><category>calpella</category><category>chip</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-520um</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i7-620um</category><category>core i7-640um</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-520um</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-620um</category><category>CoreI7-640um</category><category>cpu</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptop cpu</category><category>LaptopCpu</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>thin and light</category><category>ThinAndLight</category><category>ultrathin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Core i5 750 reportedly arriving September 6, bringing Core i7 friends]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fglobal.hkepc.com%2F3673&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/21jul09_intelupcoming.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Presumably, Intel has been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/intel-slips-core-i5-platform-to-september-competition-needed/">holding back</a> its Core i5 CPUs in an effort not to cannibalize the prodigious success of its Core 2 line, but the chips had to come out of the oven at some point. If Chinese sources are to be believed, that time could be early this September. As detailed above, the i5 mainstream offerings will start at 2.66GHz (Core i5-750), alongside two additions to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/15/leaked-intel-roadmap-specs-upcoming-core-i5-and-i7-lynnfield-c/">Core i7 family</a>, the 860 (2.8GHz) and 870 (2.93GHz). The new parts are highlighted by 8MB of cache and Turbo Boost -- Intel's auto-overclocking system that speeds things up when your cooling allows it. Click through for another slide detailing Clarkdale plans for 2010, which seem to agree with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/29/intels-32nm-clarkdale-cpus-moved-up-to-q4-a-full-year-ahead-of/">earlier rumors</a> on the subject. Mmm, fresh silicon.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/intel-core-i5-750-i7-860-and-i7-870-coming-september-6th-2149859/">Slashgear</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Core i5 750 reportedly arriving September 6, bringing Core i7 friends</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/">Intel Core i5 750 reportedly arriving September 6, bringing Core i7 friends</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fglobal.hkepc.com%2F3673&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19104974/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/21/intel-core-i5-750-reportedly-arriving-september-6-bringing-core/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automated overclocking</category><category>AutomatedOverclocking</category><category>Clarkdale</category><category>Core 2</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i5 750</category><category>Core i7</category><category>Core2</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5750</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>cpu</category><category>Intel</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Turbo Boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-medfield-05-17-09.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">We've been hearing about Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> processor for some time now, but much of the talk so far has been about it being an Atom-replacement for netbooks and MIDs. A seemingly recent Intel presentation obtained by the folks at <em>UMPC Portal</em> is now shedding a bit more light on the matter, however, and it's looking like smartphones could actually be at the heart of Intel's long-term plans. As you can see above, and in the complete presentation at the link below, Intel sees its base of devices getting larger and larger as its processors get smaller and more power-efficient, and it looks like "mainstream smartphones" could become a reality as soon as 2011. That's due largely to the 32nm manufacturing process used for the smaller Medfield processor, which also makes uses a smaller board size that leaves more room for keypads, batteries and whatnot. Of course, we are still talking about Intel predicting the state of devices two years out, so who knows how things will shake out in the interim.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobile</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-medfield-05-17-09.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">We've been hearing about Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> processor for some time now, but much of the talk so far has been about it being an Atom-replacement for netbooks and MIDs. A seemingly recent Intel presentation obtained by the folks at <em>UMPC Portal</em> is now shedding a bit more light on the matter, however, and it's looking like smartphones could actually be at the heart of Intel's long-term plans. As you can see above, and in the complete presentation at the link below, Intel sees its base of devices getting larger and larger as its processors get smaller and more power-efficient, and it looks like "mainstream smartphones" could become a reality as soon as 2011. That's due largely to the 32nm manufacturing process used for the smaller Medfield processor, which also makes uses a smaller board size that leaves more room for keypads, batteries and whatnot. Of course, we are still talking about Intel predicting the state of devices two years out, so who knows how things will shake out in the interim.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel reveals notebook and netbook plans for the rest of the year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090512PD211.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="Intel reveals notebook and netbook plans for the rest of the year" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-roadmap-20090512-558.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
The netbook formula hasn't evolved much since its inception, still offering largely the same configuration and performance as it ever has. That likely won't change until the end of the summer, with Intel announcing that it's even thinking about retiring the newer Atom N280 processor and GN40 chipset entirely, leaving the older and more common N270 with its 945GSE as the main choice until September, when the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pineview">Pineview</a> Atom chips might finally hit production. The company is also creating a whitebox N270-based 8.9-inch netbook that it's shopping around to resellers, again not doing any favors to fans of variety. Moving up to skinny 12- to 13-inch notebooks, Intel is still pushing its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CULV">CULV</a> architecture, and has its dual-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/calpella">Calpella</a> platform poised for inclusion in anything with a targeted MSRP of $1,200 and above -- and a release date sometime after the third quarter. That's a few months too late to catch the needy college freshman crowd, Intel.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/">Intel reveals notebook and netbook plans for the rest of the year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 May 2009 07:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090512PD211.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1543471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/intel-reveals-notebook-and-netbook-plans-for-the-rest-of-the-yea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>calpella</category><category>culv</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>intel calpella</category><category>intel culv</category><category>intel n270</category><category>intel n280</category><category>intel pineview</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelCalpella</category><category>IntelCulv</category><category>IntelN270</category><category>IntelN280</category><category>IntelPineview</category><category>n270</category><category>n280</category><category>netbook</category><category>pineview</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rumored Intel roadmap names next Atom "Medfield" ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/1intel-chip.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<div align="left">Rumors are swirling about Intel's roadmap of forthcoming netbook and handheld processors, which apparently showed up in a recent report by UBS. The roadmap seems to confirm the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/">previously seen Pineview</a>, and codenames its successor "Medfield," which is to be built on 32-nanometer process technology. Pineview, after some speculation, seems to have been nailed down as a 45-nanometer chip, and will be released in 2009, while Medfield, a complete system-on-chip, will follow in 2010. Medfield will have two variants, one for netbooks rumored to use the current <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT">integrated GPU</span>, and one for MIDs, which is said to carry a <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"> PowerVR graphics core like the one used in the iPhone. Intel</span> has apparently confirmed the codename "Medfield," but, when questioned, wouldn't answer to allegations that the person who'd come up with the moniker had been fired on grounds of being the least creative namer in the history of naming. <br /></div>
<div align="left"><br />[Via <a href="http://www.techdigest.tv/2008/12/intel_chip_road.html">Tech Digest</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/12/06/medfield-atom">Read</a> - Medfield is the next Atom<br /><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/08/intel_roadmaps_medfield/">Read</a> - Intel's 32 nm Atom roadmapped<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/">Rumored Intel roadmap names next Atom "Medfield" </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1394702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32-nanometer</category><category>atom</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>pinefield</category><category>powervr</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Phenom II CPU roadmap foreshadows potent Spring]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hkepc.com%2F2044&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-2-08-amd-phenom-ii.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Not that AMD's being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/21/amd-overclocks-the-snot-out-of-phenom-ii-processors/">overly secretive</a> about its forthcoming Phenom II processor, but it hasn't exactly been forthcoming with model names / estimated ship dates, either. And that folks, is why we look to leaks. A recent writeup over on Chinese site <em>HKEPC</em> details the impending chip family by listing over a dozen new CPUs (including two Phenom II X3s and seven Phenom II X4s) that are destined to be announced between CES and June 2009. Not surprisingly, some of the model names aren't -- shall we way, <em>completely original</em> -- with the 3GHz Phenom II X4 940 and 2.8GHz Phenom II X4 920 sharing eerily similar naming schemes with Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/purported-intel-core-i7-details-leak-out-920-940-and-965-model/">fresh Core i7</a>. Of course, we're not sticklers for silly things like that -- we just want to see a few slabs of silicon get out the door on time. Is that really <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/amd-delays-phenom-9700-and-9900-processors-few-notice/">too much</a> to ask, AMD?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10110433-64.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/">AMD Phenom II CPU roadmap foreshadows potent Spring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hkepc.com%2F2044&amp;sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1388489/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/amd-phenom-ii-cpu-roadmap-foreshadows-potent-spring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>920</category><category>940</category><category>AMD</category><category>core i7</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CPU</category><category>Dragon</category><category>intel</category><category>Phenom</category><category>Phenom II</category><category>Phenom II X4</category><category>Phenom II X4 920</category><category>Phenom II X4 940</category><category>PhenomIi</category><category>PhenomIiX4</category><category>PhenomIiX4920</category><category>PhenomIiX4940</category><category>processor</category><category>quad-core</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel roadmap shows Centrino 2 bump just before Calpella hits]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="file:///Users/laura/Desktop/montevina_refresh_3.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://sg.vr-zone.com/articles/intel-clarksfield--ibex-peak-m-chipsets-in-q3-09/6138.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/montevina_refresh_3.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Montevina/">Montevina</a> mobile processors will get a significant bump in the 2nd quarter of 2009 with the 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo T9900, and the 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo P8800. A completely separate, slightly more suspect <em>Digitimes</em> rumor tells of a possible Core 2 Quad Q9600 CPU of unknown speed and power. Regardless, we won't get to bask in their awesomeness for very long, as the switchover to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Calpella/">Calpella</a> platform (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/intels-clarksfield-to-begin-production-in-second-half-of-2009/">Clarksfield</a>) will follow quickly in the 3rd quarter of 2009. Will the rumor-mill never cease to torture us? <br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/10/23/intel.mobile.updates.in.q2/">Electronista</a>]<br /><a href="http://sg.vr-zone.com/articles/intel-clarksfield--ibex-peak-m-chipsets-in-q3-09/6138.html"><br />Read</a> - Intel Clarksfield &amp; Ibex Peak-M Chipsets In Q3 '09<br /><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20081022PD218.html">Read</a> - Intel planning Montevina Refresh<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/">Leaked Intel roadmap shows Centrino 2 bump just before Calpella hits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1351157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/23/leaked-intel-roadmap-shows-centrino-2-bump-just-before-calpella/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calpella</category><category>centrino 2</category><category>Centrino2</category><category>core 2</category><category>core 2 duo</category><category>Core2</category><category>Core2Duo</category><category>intel</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>montevina</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://74.125.93.104/translate_c?hl=en&amp;langpair=ja|en&amp;u=http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0904/kaigai464.htm&amp;usg=ALkJrhiS36KNJlakjRxFwjrX5qsP7KbLSw"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/atom-roadmap.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Just as you were getting your head wrapped around Atom-branded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/diamondville">Diamondville</a>-class processors based on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Silverthorn/">Silverthorne</a> architecture, along comes the next generation. Expected to arrive in Q3 of 2009, the new 45-nm Pineview processors will come in hyperthreaded single- and dual-core versions like the current generation Atom 2xx- and 3xx-series. However, the procs will be based on a new Lincroft micro-architecture boasting an integrated graphics core and memory manager that connects to memory via DMI, not a FSB. Unfortunately, the all important TDP power-draw off your tiny netbook's battery in currently undefined. Hit the read link for the full roadmap and processor timeline if that's the kind of thing that twirls your propellor.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/09/05/intel_pineview_debut_roadmap/">RegHardware</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/">Next generation Atom processors for netbooks scheduled for Q3, 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://74.125.93.104/translate_c?hl=en&amp;langpair=ja|en&amp;u=http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0904/kaigai464.htm&amp;usg=ALkJrhiS36KNJlakjRxFwjrX5qsP7KbLSw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1305357/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>diamondville</category><category>dmi</category><category>fsb533</category><category>intel</category><category>lincroft</category><category>netbook</category><category>pineview</category><category>roadmap</category><category>silverthorne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel slides reveal 8-core CPUs, AVX instruction set]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.canardplus.com/dossier-35-200-Processeur_de_Nehalem_a_Haswell.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/8-15-08-ticktock.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We recently learned that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a> would be (officially) calling <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/10/intel-oh-yeah-and-were-calling-nehalem-core-i7/">Nehalem Core i7</a> and Centrino Atom, um, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/intel-centrino-atom-becomes-atom-atom-still-atom-youre-confus/">Atom</a>. Now, however, we've got a few more related details for you to digest thanks to a stack of leaked presentation slides. The Tick Tock Development Model explains that both Westmere and Sandy Bridge (codenames, of course) will be fabricated with 32-nanometer technology in 2009 - 2010. Moving even further into the unknown, geeks can expect Ivy Bridge and Haswell (both doing the whole 22-nanometer thing) to surface between 2011 and 2012. The Sandy Bridge architecture will reportedly "double the number of cores per die to eight," while a new instruction set coined Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) will likely get most of the attention. For those of you who haven't conked out yet (you know who you are), hit the links below to get a better idea of what your future rigs will likely house.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/08/14/intel.2009.1010.leaked.map/">Electronista</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/">Leaked Intel slides reveal 8-core CPUs, AVX instruction set</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.canardplus.com/dossier-35-200-Processeur_de_Nehalem_a_Haswell.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1286185/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advanced Vectors Extensions</category><category>AdvancedVectorsExtensions</category><category>atom</category><category>AVX</category><category>Core i7</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>cpu</category><category>cure 2 duo</category><category>Cure2Duo</category><category>Haswell</category><category>intel</category><category>Larabee</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>Tolapai</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel details the Larrabee next-gen hybrid CPU / GPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=534"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-18-08-larrabee.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Although they've gotten better recently, Intel's integrated graphics chipsets have never gotten a ton of love -- the underpowered 915 chipset is at the heart of the whole <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/microsoft-lowered-vista-requirements-to-help-intel-sell-incompat/">"Vista Capable" debacle</a>, for example -- but it looks like the company's about to make a strong play to be your new pixel-pusher of choice with the new Larrabee graphics chip. Based on the x86 instruction set, the new chip isn't just limited to GPU duties, but can serve as a general-purpose processor as well. Early 16-core versions have been developed with max speeds of over 2GHz, but the design can apparently scale to thousands of cores in the future. The plan is first to release Larrabee chips as separate graphics units in Q4 of this year, but early next year we should see both laptop and desktop-oriented 45nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intels-6-core-dunnington-coming-in-2008-nehalem-official/">Nehalem</a> processors with the Larrabee tech built right in. That should beat AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/amd-talks-specs-on-fusion-continues-to-release-nothing/">Fusion</a> processors to market -- looks like the race is on.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=534">Read</a> - PC Perspective roadmap article with Intel slides<br /><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Intel%20Discusses%20GPU%20Hybrid%20CPUs/article11088.htm">Read</a> - DailyTech roadmap with Larrabee details<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/">Intel details the Larrabee next-gen hybrid CPU / GPU</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1143302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>intel</category><category>larrabee</category><category>nehalem</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 6-core Xeon and Nehalem CPU info leaked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Sun%20Leaks%206core%20Intel%20Xeon%20Nehalem%20Details/article10834.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/dunnington.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Intel's had its new processor plans slipped out to the public thanks to Sun, according to DailyTech. Details on the 6-core (!) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Xeon/">Xeon</a> Dunnington, as well as the kinda-sorta hush-hush <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nehalem/">Nehalem</a> were apparently leaked out onto Sun's public web server over the weekend, including plans for the new Xeons to overtake the company's Tigerton CPU line. The Dunnington processors will have a 16MB L3 cache shared by all six cores, and will be pin-compatible with the Tigertons, thus making integration with your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Clarksboro/">Clarksboro</a> chipset slightly less painful... by being possible. The Nehalem also got the spy treatment, with news that it will not only replace the Penryn line in Q4 '08, but will also be the first time in 18 years that Intel includes on-die memory controllers. If this sort of thing is important to you (and we think it may be) hit the read link and get all the juicy details.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/">Intel's 6-core Xeon and Nehalem CPU info leaked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/Sun%20Leaks%206core%20Intel%20Xeon%20Nehalem%20Details/article10834.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1123910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpu</category><category>dunnington</category><category>info</category><category>intel</category><category>leak</category><category>nehalem</category><category>penryn</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sun</category><category>tigerton</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
