<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano may not exist, but this KIRF does]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/eng-2-kirf-iphone-4-nano-china.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
While the folks "familiar with the matter" continue to debate over whether or not we'll actually see a real life <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/iphone nano">iPhone nano</a> at some point in our lifetime, the crafty <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/kirf">KIRFers</a> in China have taken matters into their own -- apparently undersized -- hands. Yes people, what you see above is a Shanzhai-crafted shrunken iPhone 4 running an iOS rip-off based on Java, garnished with a 1.3 megapixel camera. All it takes is a measly &yen;380 (approximately $58) to be the coolest kid on the block with the "next iPhone" -- and maybe a quick trip to China.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/">iPhone nano may not exist, but this KIRF does</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 20 Apr 2011 03:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19916845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/kirf-iphone-nano-has-iphone-4-styling-beats-the-real-thing-to-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>china</category><category>fake</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>Iphone4</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>kirf</category><category>nano</category><category>rim</category><category>sanzhai</category><category>shanzhai</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Schulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 03:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT: Apple considering a cheaper iPhone, but not a smaller one right now]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/retina-display.png" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/10/bloomberg-apple-working-on-cheaper-smaller-and-dual-mode-iph/"><em>Bloomberg</em></a> and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> seemed pretty sure that an iPhone nano was inbound, but the <em>New York Times</em>' anonymous sources dispute that tale -- the paper writes that "Apple is not currently developing a smaller iPhone," and that the company is "not planning to introduce a smaller iPhone anytime soon." While the publication doesn't outright deny the existence of such a device at any point in the story, it does quote an anonymous Apple executive as saying that it doesn't make sense for the company to create multiple iPhone form factors at any given time, and an anonymous Apple engineer as saying that cheaper components, not a smaller size, would make for a cheaper overall price. <br />
<br />
One thing's for sure: either Apple's making one, or it's not.<br />
<br />
In related news, the <em>Times</em>' sources corroborate the idea that Apple will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/">make MobileMe free</a>, and say that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/14/exclusive-the-future-of-the-ipad-2-iphone-5-and-apple-tv-and/">next full-sized iPhone</a> is nearly complete. Woo!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/">NYT: Apple considering a cheaper iPhone, but not a smaller one right now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19848990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/17/nyt-apple-considering-a-cheaper-iphone-but-not-a-smaller-one-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Ios</category><category>Iphone</category><category>Iphone Nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>Mini Iphone</category><category>Mini-iphone</category><category>MiniIphone</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>Nyt</category><category>Rumor</category><category>Rumor Mill</category><category>RumorMill</category><category>Rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The iPhone nano to forgo local storage? Common sense says 'no']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/"><img width="600" height="484" vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/iphonenano_uni.jpg" /></a></div>
Well, MWC is in full swing, where folks like LG, Samsung, Sony, and Nokia are pouring their souls out in front of us in device form. So, naturally, the rumors are swirling about... the iPhone nano. In a followup to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/"><em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s big story</a>, <em>Cult of Mac</em> is claiming some additional inside info from a source with a "great track record." The main idea is that the iPhone nano would rely on the cloud to such an extent that the device wouldn't really have <em>any</em> local storage to speak of, outside of a streaming buffer. This would of course go hand in hand with a MobileMe / Lala-powered streaming music service, and result in significant component cost savings (flash memory is still pretty spendy). While this sounds like a beautiful dream, it doesn't make much sense in 2011. Streaming all your music and other media over a capped 3G connection doesn't sound very consumer-friendly, and there are still plenty of situations where having a nice offline stash of music is a lifesaver. But there's a bigger problem: where do you put your apps without local storage? Android's historic shortage of app storage really bit it in the ass, and we doubt Apple wants to go down that route. Sure, we can see a 4GB or so ultracheap device, with a heavy reliance on streaming media (many people get most of their music from Pandora these days, anyways), but a memory-free iPhone just doesn't sound feasible at this point in time.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/">The iPhone nano to forgo local storage? Common sense says 'no'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19843337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/the-iphone-nano-to-forgo-local-storage-common-sense-says-no/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>cloud</category><category>cult of mac</category><category>CultOfMac</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>lala</category><category>mini iphone</category><category>MiniIphone</category><category>mobileme</category><category>music streaming</category><category>MusicStreaming</category><category>rumor</category><category>streaming</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WSJ corroborates the mini-iPhone, says Apple may make MobileMe free (update: 'edge-to-edge' screen)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/sim-cut-2010-11-22.jpg" alt="" /></a>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> has weighed in on rumors of Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/10/bloomberg-apple-working-on-cheaper-smaller-and-dual-mode-iph/">smaller iPhone</a>, and citing "people familiar with the matter" the publication says that the rumors are likely true. One such familiar person reportedly saw a device half the size of the iPhone 4, bearing the codename "N97," and said that the handset will be only about half the size of the original, and at only around half the price too. Amazingly, those anonymous sources continued to divulge information, expressing the idea that Apple could <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/22/apples-find-my-iphone-ipad-service-now-free-doesnt-require/">finally make</a> its MobileMe cloud service suite free, and that it <em>just might</em> be the platform from which Apple could finally launch a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/03/apples-lala-music-team-working-on-video-streaming-service-for-2/">streaming music platform</a> and lessen the need for all those gigabytes of flash storage in your pocket. We'll let you know if or when any of that happens, okay?<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>The <em>WSJ</em>'s source proved even more talkative after getting an eyeful of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-official-tegra-2-4-3-inch-super-amoled-plu/">Samsung</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/the-sony-ericsson-xperia-play/">Sony</a> announcements this morn; the publication's article has been updated to read that the device is "significantly lighter" than the iPhone 4, has an "edge-to-edge" touchscreen, and "voice-based navigation" of some sort.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/">WSJ corroborates the mini-iPhone, says Apple may make MobileMe free (update: 'edge-to-edge' screen)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19841829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/wsj-corroborates-the-mini-iphone-says-apple-may-make-mobileme-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>iOS</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>mini iphone</category><category>MiniIphone</category><category>MobileMe</category><category>music</category><category>N97</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumor mill</category><category>RumorMill</category><category>rumors</category><category>smartphone</category><category>streaming music</category><category>StreamingMusic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Keepin' it real fake, part CCXXI: Apple's iPhone and iPod nano hook up, combine]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.solomobi.com/viewproduct.asp?pro_id=2929"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/iphone-nano-kirf.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Hey, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> -- you know that inspiration you've been looking for in order to concoct a proper <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone+nano/">iPhone nano</a>? We just found it. Over in some seedy warehouse in the depths of Shenzhen, the aptly titled iphone nano has emerged. As you could likely surmise, this completely improper knockoff gentle combines the best features from Apple's iPhone and the iPod nano to create a singular, if not awkward device. Heck, there's even a 5 megapixel camera, which <em>easily</em> trumps the 3.2 megapixel shooter on the iPhone 3GS. It's all yours for just 90 bones, and you don't even have to sign your cellular soul away to AT&amp;T. Look out Apple, we get the feeling this thing's going to be <em>huge.<br /></em><br />[Thanks, facelessloser]<em></em><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/">Keepin' it real fake, part CCXXI: Apple's iPhone and iPod nano hook up, combine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.solomobi.com/viewproduct.asp?pro_id=2929>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19091835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>fake</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod kirf</category><category>IpodKirf</category><category>kirf</category><category>knockoff</category><category>mobile</category><category>nano</category><category>NG68</category><category>ripoff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Keepin' it real fake, part CCXXI: Apple's iPhone and iPod nano hook up, combine]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.solomobi.com/viewproduct.asp?pro_id=2929"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/iphone-nano-kirf.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Hey, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> -- you know that inspiration you've been looking for in order to concoct a proper <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/iphone+nano/">iPhone nano</a>? We just found it. Over in some seedy warehouse in the depths of Shenzhen, the aptly titled iphone nano has emerged. As you could likely surmise, this completely improper knockoff gentle combines the best features from Apple's iPhone and the iPod nano to create a singular, if not awkward device. Heck, there's even a 5 megapixel camera, which <em>easily</em> trumps the 3.2 megapixel shooter on the iPhone 3GS. It's all yours for just 90 bones, and you don't even have to sign your cellular soul away to AT&amp;T. Look out Apple, we get the feeling this thing's going to be <em>huge.<br /></em><br />[Thanks, facelessloser]<em></em><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/">Keepin' it real fake, part CCXXI: Apple's iPhone and iPod nano hook up, combine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.solomobi.com/viewproduct.asp?pro_id=2929>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19091822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/keepin-it-real-fake-part-ccxxi-apples-iphone-and-ipod-nano-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>fake</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod kirf</category><category>IpodKirf</category><category>kirf</category><category>knockoff</category><category>nano</category><category>NG68</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>ripoff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More next-gen iPhone whispers: video recording, faster CPU, July release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/05/the_next_iphone"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/telescopeiphone3g.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
John Gruber over at <em>Daring Fireball</em> has a pretty good track record when it comes to Apple rumors -- remember his spot-on predictions for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/13/mr-blurrycam-reveals-the-updated-macbook-pro-899-laptop-model/">unibody MacBook Pro</a>? -- so when he's got a thing or two to say about all the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone">next-gen iPhone</a> chatter, we listen. While not making any promises, he does say he'd wager quite a bit on a new model coming to WWDC, with about twice the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/new-iphone-specs-leaked-600mhz-cpu-32gb-3-2mp-cam/">CPU horsepower</a> (and possibly twice the RAM, too) as the current model. He also adds some credence to all that talk of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/video-iphone-to-feature-imovie-app/">video</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/07/iphone-3-0-video-recording-interface-compass-support-spotted/">recording</a>, but makes no mention of potential <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/apple-may-or-may-not-be-mulling-background-apps-for-the-iphone/">background apps</a> and plays down any surprise <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2Ctablet">tablet</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">"iPhone mini"</a> cameos. He goes on to add release date would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/new-iphone-parts-begin-shipping-from-suppliers-for-june-launch">sometime in July</a> in 16GB and 32GB varieties. We can't say we're willing to bet against him, but that doesn't mean we'll take his word as gospel. We can safely say, however, that we're anxiously waiting to see what kind of shenanigans <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/apple-confirms-wwdc-keynote-time-phil-schiller-leading-the-way/">Schiller has in store</a> for next month.<br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/os-x/" rel="tag">iPhone OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/">More next-gen iPhone whispers: video recording, faster CPU, July release?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 20:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://daringfireball.net/2009/05/the_next_iphone>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1553379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>16gb</category><category>16gb iphone</category><category>16gbIphone</category><category>32gb</category><category>32gb iphone</category><category>32gbIphone</category><category>apple</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple iphone 3g</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIphone3g</category><category>AppleTablet</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone mini</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>iphone os</category><category>iphone rumor</category><category>iphone rumors</category><category>iphone video</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>IphoneMini</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>iphoneos</category><category>IphoneRumor</category><category>IphoneRumors</category><category>IphoneVideo</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><category>video recording</category><category>VideoRecording</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More next-gen iPhone whispers: video recording, faster CPU, July release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/05/the_next_iphone"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/telescopeiphone3g.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
John Gruber over at <em>Daring Fireball</em> has a pretty good track record when it comes to Apple rumors -- remember his spot-on predictions for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/13/mr-blurrycam-reveals-the-updated-macbook-pro-899-laptop-model/">unibody MacBook Pro</a>? -- so when he's got a thing or two to say about all the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone">next-gen iPhone</a> chatter, we listen. While not making any promises, he does say he'd wager quite a bit on a new model coming to WWDC, with about twice the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/new-iphone-specs-leaked-600mhz-cpu-32gb-3-2mp-cam/">CPU horsepower</a> (and possibly twice the RAM, too) as the current model. He also adds some credence to all that talk of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/video-iphone-to-feature-imovie-app/">video</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/07/iphone-3-0-video-recording-interface-compass-support-spotted/">recording</a>, but makes no mention of potential <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/16/apple-may-or-may-not-be-mulling-background-apps-for-the-iphone/">background apps</a> and plays down any surprise <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2Ctablet">tablet</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">"iPhone mini"</a> cameos. He goes on to add release date would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/new-iphone-parts-begin-shipping-from-suppliers-for-june-launch">sometime in July</a> in 16GB and 32GB varieties. We can't say we're willing to bet against him, but that doesn't mean we'll take his word as gospel. We can safely say, however, that we're anxiously waiting to see what kind of shenanigans <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/apple-confirms-wwdc-keynote-time-phil-schiller-leading-the-way/">Schiller has in store</a> for next month.<br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/">More next-gen iPhone whispers: video recording, faster CPU, July release?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 20:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://daringfireball.net/2009/05/the_next_iphone>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1553364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/more-next-gen-iphone-whispers-video-recording-faster-cpu-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>16gb</category><category>16gb iphone</category><category>16gbIphone</category><category>32gb</category><category>32gb iphone</category><category>32gbIphone</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple iphone 3g</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIphone3g</category><category>AppleTablet</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone mini</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>iphone rumor</category><category>iphone rumors</category><category>iphone video</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>IphoneMini</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>IphoneRumor</category><category>IphoneRumors</category><category>IphoneVideo</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>tablet</category><category>video</category><category>video recording</category><category>VideoRecording</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget Podcast 144 - 05.01.2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/02/engadget-podcast.jpg" alt="" title="Engadget Podcast" /></div>
<br />
Bogged down and confused with the latest spate of wild mobile speculations? Relationship troubles clouding your judgment? Lonely? Well Josh, Nilay and Paul -- your jovial (yet often enraged) Engadget Podcast crew -- are back for another installment to help you sort all that out. In a week heavy on rumors (Palm Eos, Microsoft "Pink" and the not-so-nano "iPhone lite") and laden with opinion (Windows 7 RC1, TiVo's sad state of affairs), join the boys as they delve deep into the abyss that is gadgetry. Sure, there might never be a Zunephone, but remember: the beauty is in the journey... or something.<br />
<br />
<strong>Hosts:</strong> Joshua Topolsky, Nilay Patel, Paul Miller<br />
<strong>Producer:</strong> Trent Wolbe<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Song:</span> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--MsHsifcTI">All That She Wants</a><br />
<br />
00:01:13 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/">Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?</a><br />
00:27:20 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/microsofts-pink-smartphone-could-rival-iphone-on-verizon/">Microsoft's "Pink" smartphone could rival iPhone on Verizon</a><br />
00:29:00 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/microsoft-reiterates-what-we-knew-no-first-party-handset-no-zu/">Microsoft reiterates what we knew: no first-party handset, no Zunephone</a><br />
00:36:40 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/apple-prototyping-iphone-lite-and-macbook-mini-media-pad-for/">Apple prototyping "iPhone lite" and MacBook Mini / media pad for Verizon?</a><br />
00:46:30 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/27/samsung-i7500-oled-handset-powered-by-android-dreams/">Samsung I7500 with OLED touchscreen powered by Android, dreams</a><br />
00:57:42 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/windows-7-release-candidate-1-impressions-insights-and-expecta/">Windows 7 Release Candidate 1 impressions, insights, and expectations</a><br />
01:10:05 - <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/ten-years-of-tivo-how-far-we-havent-come/">Ten years of TiVo: how far we haven't come</a><br />
<br />
<strong>Subscribe to the podcast</strong><br />
<br />
[<a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73329281">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to the Podcast directly in iTunes (enhanced AAC).<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.engadget.com/rss.xml">RSS MP3</a>] Add the Engadget Podcast feed (in MP3) to your RSS aggregator and have the show delivered automatically.<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.engadget.com/rss-aac.xml">RSS AAC</a>] Add the Engadget Podcast feed (in enhanced AAC) to your RSS aggregator.<br />
[<a href="zune://subscribe/?Engadget=http://podcasts.engadget.com/rss.xml">Zune</a>] Subscribe to the Podcast directly in the Zune Marketplace<br />
<br />
<strong>Download the podcast</strong><br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/podcasts/Engadget_Podcast_144.mp3">LISTEN (MP3)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/podcasts/Engadget_Podcast_144.m4a">LISTEN (AAC)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/podcasts/Engadget_Podcast_144.ogg">LISTEN (OGG)</a><br />
<br />
Contact the podcast</strong><br />
<br />
1-888-ENGADGET or podcast (at) engadget (dot) com.<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/joshuatopolsky">@joshuatopolsky</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/futurepaul">@futurepaul</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/reckless">@reckless</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/engadget">@engadget</a><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/">Engadget Podcast 144 - 05.01.2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 01 May 2009 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1534035/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/engadget-podcast-144-05-01-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>engadget podcast</category><category>EngadgetPodcast</category><category>eos</category><category>feature</category><category>featured</category><category>features</category><category>google</category><category>i7500</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>microsoft</category><category>palm</category><category>palm eos</category><category>PalmEos</category><category>pink</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcasts</category><category>rc1</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung i7500</category><category>SamsungI7500</category><category>TiVo</category><category>verizon</category><category>windows 7</category><category>windows 7 rc1</category><category>Windows7</category><category>Windows7Rc1</category><category>zune</category><category>zunephone</category><enclosure url="http://www.engadget.com/podcasts/Engadget_Podcast_144.mp3" length="43911516" type="audio/mpeg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Wolbe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:45:00 EST</pubDate><itunes:subtitle>Engadget Podcast 144</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Josh Topolsky, Nilay Patel, Paul Miller</itunes:author><itunes:duration>01:13:10</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>podcasts</itunes:keywords></item><item><title><![CDATA[New iPhone in June? Somebody seems to think so]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.business24-7.ae/articles/2009/2/pages/02032009_f24f96e7170042e29670eb063b8dc2ec.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/iphonenano_uni.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Apple has a habit of refreshing its iPod and iPhone-type products on a pretty regular schedule, so a new iPhone in June really wouldn't be the surprise of the century, but now we've got word to that effect from the United Arab Emirates. Etisalat is picking up the iPhone 3G over there, along with providing support for existing iPhones sold on the gray market, but the writeup in <em>Business 24/7</em> makes mention of a brand new iPhone hitting in June, which Etisalat will also get at launch. This could easily be a misunderstanding on the part of the reporter, a misquote, or a combination of signs, portents and omens, but it's certainly an interesting little tidbit. We'd have to think that anyone liable to get this story right would also be aware that a brand new iPhone would be worth more than a passing reference, but we suppose we'll just have to wait and see. <em>Apple Insider</em> also mentions rumblings of an upcoming iPhone having a fairly significant architecture overhaul -- that's mostly conjecture at this point, but might make sense (or room) for an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">iPhone nano</a>. And you know <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/">how we love the iPhone nano</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/02/03/report_hints_at_next_gen_iphone_in_june.html">Apple Insider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/os-x/" rel="tag">iPhone OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/">New iPhone in June? Somebody seems to think so</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.business24-7.ae/articles/2009/2/pages/02032009_f24f96e7170042e29670eb063b8dc2ec.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1448797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>emirates</category><category>etisalat</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>iphone os</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>iphoneos</category><category>mobile</category><category>uae</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New iPhone in June? Somebody seems to think so]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.business24-7.ae/articles/2009/2/pages/02032009_f24f96e7170042e29670eb063b8dc2ec.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/iphonenano_uni.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apple has a habit of refreshing its iPod and iPhone-type products on a pretty regular schedule, so a new iPhone in June really wouldn't be the surprise of the century, but now we've got word to that effect from the United Arab Emirates. Etisalat is picking up the iPhone 3G over there, along with providing support for existing iPhones sold on the gray market, but the writeup in <em>Business 24/7</em> makes mention of a brand new iPhone hitting in June, which Etisalat will also get at launch. This could easily be a misunderstanding on the part of the reporter, a misquote, or a combination of signs, portents and omens, but it's certainly an interesting little tidbit. We'd have to think that anyone liable to get this story right would also be aware that a brand new iPhone would be worth more than a passing reference, but we suppose we'll just have to wait and see. <em>Apple Insider</em> also mentions rumblings of an upcoming iPhone having a fairly significant architecture overhaul -- that's mostly conjecture at this point, but might make sense (or room) for an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">iPhone nano</a>. And you know <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/">how we love the iPhone nano</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/02/03/report_hints_at_next_gen_iphone_in_june.html">Apple Insider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/">New iPhone in June? Somebody seems to think so</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.business24-7.ae/articles/2009/2/pages/02032009_f24f96e7170042e29670eb063b8dc2ec.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1448794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/new-iphone-in-june-somebody-seems-to-think-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emirates</category><category>etisalat</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>uae</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano now rumored for June, Unicorn delayed again until September]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090113PB200.html&lt;br%20/&gt;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/iphonenano_uni.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Ready for more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhonenano/">iPhone nano</a> rumors? Good, because apparently the Chinese trade paper <em>Economic Daily News</em> is now reporting that Taiwan Semiconductor Company (TSMC) will be handling chip manufacturing for a low-cost device being referred to as... you guessed it: the iPhone nano. While the paper has a fairly good reputation, it is filtered through the lens of <em>DigiTimes</em> on our end, so as usual, take it with the required grain of salt. Still, the source is calling a June launch of the handset on the heels of an order for the components in March. The time frame is reasonable enough, and if history is any lesson here, Apple loves to intro iPhones in the Summer. Given that China has yet to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/01/china-mobiles-talks-to-nab-iphone-turning-the-corner/">see a deal</a> for the iPhone proper, and a lower-cost entry may be perfectly tuned for vast Asian markets, the nano could gather in a whole new fold of users (and the smaller screen would be less of an issue given the need for character recognition). That theory falls in line with statements from analysts, though as always, putting too much stock in any of this speculation could be hazardous to your health. Just ask Steve Jobs.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/13/paper_suggests_apples_iphone_nano_will_ring_this_spring.html">AppleInsider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/">iPhone nano now rumored for June, Unicorn delayed again until September</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090113PB200.html%3Cbr%20/%3E>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1428392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>asia</category><category>china</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>speculation</category><category>Taiwan Semiconductor Company</category><category>TaiwanSemiconductorCompany</category><category>tsmc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano now rumored for June, Unicorn delayed again until September]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090113PB200.html&lt;br%20/&gt;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/iphonenano_uni.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Ready for more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhonenano/">iPhone nano</a> rumors? Good, because apparently the Chinese trade paper <em>Economic Daily News</em> is now reporting that Taiwan Semiconductor Company (TSMC) will be handling chip manufacturing for a low-cost device being referred to as... you guessed it: the iPhone nano. While the paper has a fairly good reputation, it is filtered through the lens of <em>DigiTimes</em> on our end, so as usual, take it with the required grain of salt. Still, the source is calling a June launch of the handset on the heels of an order for the components in March. The time frame is reasonable enough, and if history is any lesson here, Apple loves to intro iPhones in the Summer. Given that China has yet to <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/07/01/china-mobiles-talks-to-nab-iphone-turning-the-corner/">see a deal</a> for the iPhone proper, and a lower-cost entry may be perfectly tuned for vast Asian markets, the nano could gather in a whole new fold of users (and the smaller screen would be less of an issue given the need for character recognition). That theory falls in line with statements from analysts, though as always, putting too much stock in any of this speculation could be hazardous to your health. Just ask Steve Jobs.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/13/paper_suggests_apples_iphone_nano_will_ring_this_spring.html">AppleInsider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/">iPhone nano now rumored for June, Unicorn delayed again until September</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090113PB200.html%3Cbr%20/%3E>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1428336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/13/iphone-nano-now-rumored-for-june-unicorn-delayed-again-until-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>asia</category><category>china</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>rumor</category><category>speculation</category><category>Taiwan Semiconductor Company</category><category>TaiwanSemiconductorCompany</category><category>tsmc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple rumor roundup: aluminum Mac minis and supersized iPod touches]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/ipod-large-concept.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Listen, you know the drill by now: Macworld is less than a week away, and that causes a Cupertino-sized rumor mill to fill up with hints of new / refreshed hardware of all shapes and sizes. The crew at <em>TUAW</em> claim they've heard from sources that a new Mac mini will be unveiled with an aluminum finish, a Time Capsule-esque "lip," and a SATA optical drive that can be customized as a second HDD instead. Additionally, <em>TechCrunch</em> says it has three independent sources that confirm there's a large iPod touch is coming next Fall with a 7 or 9-inch screen. There's no indication if they expect a Macworld announcement here, but if true, we expect the cargo pants industry to react accordingly. Finally, and possibly related to the <em>TechCrunch</em> rumor, a Taiwan news site claims Quanta Computers is expecting to add Apple and Sony (is that you, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vaio%20p">Vaio P</a>?) as clients for manufacturing netbooks in 2009. For those playing along at home, at some point next year we should expect a bigger iPod touch, a netbook, a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">smaller iPhone</a>, a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/20/new-imac-mac-mini-looking-more-probable-after-minute-discovery/">revised iMac</a>, a revised Mac mini, and absolutely no love at all for the Mac Pro.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/">Read</a> - Large form iPod touch to launch Fall '09<br /><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/12/31/rumor-watch-new-mac-mini-go-for-launch/">Read</a> - Rumor watch: new Mac mini go for launch<br /><a href="http://www.taiwanheadlines.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=145170&amp;CtNode=39">Read</a> - Quanta expects zero YoY NB shipment growth in Q4, 2008<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/">Apple rumor roundup: aluminum Mac minis and supersized iPod touches</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1415651/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/31/apple-rumor-roundup-aluminum-mac-minis-and-supersized-ipod-touc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>large ipod touch</category><category>LargeIpodTouch</category><category>mac mini</category><category>MacMini</category><category>macworld</category><category>macworld 08</category><category>Macworld08</category><category>netbook</category><category>netbooks</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is the deal with the iPhone nano?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/29/vaja-also-hints-at-iphone-nano/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/nano_seinfeld1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Adding to a small stack of rumors about a supposed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhonenano/">iPhone nano</a>, case-maker Vaja today quietly added the category to its website (pictured after the break). Frankly, we're not sure what to think. There are a number of ways in which Apple could produce a cheaper phone or alter its subsidy deals, so the idea of an iPhone that's <em>simply smaller</em> makes very little sense. Yet, here we are showing off the site of a reputable accessory manufacturer with a brand new phone listed -- ostensibly just a teensy version of the iPhone 3G. Of course, this is probably just rumor, speculation, lies, corruption, signs of an unquenchable thirst for power, and a glimpse at the machinations behind one of the greatest conspiracies mankind has ever known. So, we're posing the question to the biggest brains of all: the Engadget reader. Is Apple working on an iPhone nano?<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/#poll24426">View Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What is the deal with the iPhone nano?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/">What is the deal with the iPhone nano?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/29/vaja-also-hints-at-iphone-nano/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1414108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/29/what-is-the-deal-with-the-iphone-nano/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>nano</category><category>poll</category><category>rumor</category><category>seinfeld</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/iphone-twins-1.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div> There's something just a little <em>skeezy </em>about basing predictions for Important New Apple Products upon nasty renders of protective case mockups from China. Still, they've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/19/3g-iphone-revealed-in-third-party-case-render/">panned out astonishingly nicely</a> before, so we'll just have to suck it up. iDealsChina is reporting that XSKN is not-so-secretly working on a silicone skin for the upcoming "Nano iPhone" (or, more likely, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">iPhone nano</a>) a shorter, chubbier version of the iPhone 3G. According to iDealsChina sources, the phone will apparently sport EDGE data, but otherwise seems unsurprisingly identical in specs to its forebears, other than the obviously smaller screen. They're also saying Apple plans to sell these at high volumes for low prices at hip spots like Walmart, that the company will (naturally) be unveiling the new handset in January at Macworld, and even go so far as to say that leaked photos of the device should be surfacing in the next couple of days -- we'll be keeping our eyes peeled. Check out another couple of tantalizing case renders after the break.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-protective-case-appears/">PMP Today</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gsm/" rel="tag">GSM</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/edge/" rel="tag">EDGE</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/os-x/" rel="tag">iPhone OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/">iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.idealschina.com/Insider/NewsDetail.aspx?ArticleID=32>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1401504/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>case</category><category>edge</category><category>gsm</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>iphone os</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>iphoneos</category><category>mobile</category><category>nano iphone</category><category>NanoIphone</category><category>rumor</category><category>silicon case</category><category>SiliconCase</category><category>xskn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/iphone-twins-1.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
There's something just a little <em>skeezy </em>about basing predictions for Important New Apple Products upon nasty renders of protective case mockups from China. Still, they've <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/19/3g-iphone-revealed-in-third-party-case-render/">panned out astonishingly nicely</a> before, so we'll just have to suck it up. iDealsChina is reporting that XSKN is not-so-secretly working on a silicone skin for the upcoming "Nano iPhone" (or, more likely, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphonenano">iPhone nano</a>) a shorter, chubbier version of the iPhone 3G. According to iDealsChina sources, the phone will apparently sport EDGE data, but otherwise seems unsurprisingly identical in specs to its forebears, other than the obviously smaller screen. They're also saying Apple plans to sell these at high volumes for low prices at hip spots like Walmart, that the company will (naturally) be unveiling the new handset in January at Macworld, and even go so far as to say that leaked photos of the device should be surfacing in the next couple of days -- we'll be keeping our eyes peeled. Check out another couple of tantalizing case renders after the break.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-protective-case-appears/">PMP Today</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/">iPhone nano revealed by (another) silicone case mockup?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.idealschina.com/Insider/NewsDetail.aspx?ArticleID=32>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1401500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/iphone-nano-revealed-by-another-silicone-case-mockup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>case</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>nano iphone</category><category>NanoIphone</category><category>rumor</category><category>silicon case</category><category>SiliconCase</category><category>xskn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[3G iPhone touchscreen leaks out?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/is-this-the-new-iphones-touchscreen/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-05-08iphonetouch.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We're just four days away from <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/wwdc">WWDC</a>, so the rumor mill is churning at a fever pitch -- and the latest context-less bits of info to emerge from the churn are these purported photos of the 3G iPhone's touchscreens over at iLounge. Yeah, that's touch<em>screens</em>, plural -- if these are to believed, Apple's got two sizes of iPhone in store for us on Monday: a 3.2-inch model, and a smaller 2.8-inch model. Note that both of those sizes are smaller than the current iPhone's 3.5-inch screen, which seems slightly implausible -- but kinda-sorta matches up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/27/even-more-leaked-3g-iphone-photos-make-it-out/">with</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/iphone-sdk-contains-a-3g-iphone-icon/">other</a> rumors we've heard, including those persistent "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iphone+nano">iPhone nano</a>" whispers from last year. We still really doubt that Apple will shrink the iPhone's screen size, however, and there are literally hundreds of touchscreen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iphone+kirf">iPhone KIRFs</a> these panels could have come from, so we'd say there's a better chance this is just more hype -- but we know y'all have your own ideas. Let us know in comments!<br /><br />[Thanks, Sleuth]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/">3G iPhone touchscreen leaks out?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/is-this-the-new-iphones-touchscreen/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1217262/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>wwdc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[3G iPhone touchscreen leaks out?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/is-this-the-new-iphones-touchscreen/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-05-08iphonetouch.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We're just four days away from <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/wwdc">WWDC</a>, so the rumor mill is churning at a fever pitch -- and the latest context-less bits of info to emerge from the churn are these purported photos of the 3G iPhone's touchscreens over at iLounge. Yeah, that's touch<em>screens</em>, plural -- if these are to believed, Apple's got two sizes of iPhone in store for us on Monday: a 3.2-inch model, and a smaller 2.8-inch model. Note that both of those sizes are smaller than the current iPhone's 3.5-inch screen, which seems slightly implausible -- but kinda-sorta matches up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/27/even-more-leaked-3g-iphone-photos-make-it-out/">with</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/28/iphone-sdk-contains-a-3g-iphone-icon/">other</a> rumors we've heard, including those persistent "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iphone+nano">iPhone nano</a>" whispers from last year. We still really doubt that Apple will shrink the iPhone's screen size, however, and there are literally hundreds of touchscreen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iphone+kirf">iPhone KIRFs</a> these panels could have come from, so we'd say there's a better chance this is just more hype -- but we know y'all have your own ideas. Let us know in comments!<br /><br />[Thanks, Sleuth]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/">3G iPhone touchscreen leaks out?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/is-this-the-new-iphones-touchscreen/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1217261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/3g-iphone-touchscreen-leaks-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>wwdc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4295"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/10/iphone-nano-fake.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Okay, so, <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/18/the-iphone-nano-no-not-really/">iPhone nano</a> -- what do you picture? An identical clone of the original scaled down by a third? Yeah, us neither, which is why we're calling out this alleged iPhone nano spy shot as a fraud. We're not disputing that it's real -- in fact, we'd be surprised if it was a Photoshop job, considering how skilled the knockoff manufacturers have become at producing iPhone clones -- we just refuse to believe at this point that Apple would inject zero <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/">innovation</a> into the design of the iPhone's baby sib. For what it's worth, though, gadgetzone.nl says that its source absolutely insists that the shots are real and came from within Apple, which of course explains the Brand X monitor and PC keyboard in the background. We'll believe it when Steve shows it, guys.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2007/10/27/first-spy-pics-of-iphone-nano/">Unwired View</a>]<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> <a href="http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4300">It's a media player</a>. Rock on. Thanks, Deniz.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/">Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4295>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1023346/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>cellphone</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>kirf</category><category>nano</category><category>phone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4295"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/iphone-nano-fake.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Okay, so, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/the-iphone-nano-no-not-really/">iPhone nano</a> -- what do you picture? An identical clone of the original scaled down by a third? Yeah, us neither, which is why we're calling out this alleged iPhone nano spy shot as a fraud. We're not disputing that it's real -- in fact, we'd be surprised if it was a Photoshop job, considering how skilled the knockoff manufacturers have become at producing iPhone clones -- we just refuse to believe at this point that Apple would inject zero <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/">innovation</a> into the design of the iPhone's baby sib. For what it's worth, though, gadgetzone.nl says that its source absolutely insists that the shots are real and came from within Apple, which of course explains the Brand X monitor and PC keyboard in the background. We'll believe it when Steve shows it, guys.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2007/10/27/first-spy-pics-of-iphone-nano/">Unwired View</a>]<br /> <br /> <strong>Update:</strong> <a href="http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4300">It's a media player</a>. Rock on. Thanks, Deniz.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/">Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gadgetzone.nl/nieuws.php?id=4295>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1023341/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>kirf</category><category>mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Second generation iPhone for $249 in September?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070716VL200.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/iphone_nano_engadget-230.jpg" alt="" /></a>Remember all those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/29/quanta-wins-order-for-2nd-iphone/">version 2 iPhone</a> rumors rumbling about back in May. Well, they're back and running amuck in Taiwan. According to <em>DigiTimes</em>, Taiwan's Chinese-language <em>Commercial Times</em> says that Taiwan's Wintek has gained the touch-screen panel orders for the second-gen iPhone. The report claims that Wintek has already begun test production in small volumes with Apple intent on selling their newest model of the iPhone in September for somewhere between $249 and $299. Unfortunately, the article doesn't state <em>where</em> this flavor of the iPhone will be sold. An important omission given that September is the same rumored delivery for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/29/quanta-wins-order-for-2nd-iphone/">Quanta's iPhone variant</a> meant specifically for non-US markets. Of course, that would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/">too early</a> according to (some) JP Morgan analysts although Kevin Chang, and his vision of an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/">iPhone nano</a>, would surely disagree. To muddle things further, Wintek was just fingered as the supplier of panels for future <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/11/touch-screen-ipods-by-august/">touch-screen iPods</a> set to launch in August. However, <em>DigiTimes</em> sources are now reporting that the iPod's capacitive touch-screen will be "less complicated" than the panel used for the current iPhone. No multi-touch? Who knows. Man, rumor mongering is a silly business... interesting, but silly.<br /><br />P.S. Yes, that's a mock-up to the right.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/">Second generation iPhone for $249 in September?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070716VL200.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/942386/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>commercial times</category><category>CommercialTimes</category><category>digitimes</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>taiwan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Second generation iPhone for $249 in September?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070716VL200.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/iphone_nano_engadget-230.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Remember all those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/29/quanta-wins-order-for-2nd-iphone/">version 2 iPhone</a> rumors rumbling about back in May. Well, they're back and running amuck in Taiwan. According to <em>DigiTimes</em>, Taiwan's Chinese-language <em>Commercial Times</em> says that Taiwan's Wintek has gained the touch-screen panel orders for the second-gen iPhone. The report claims that Wintek has already begun test production in small volumes with Apple intent on selling their newest model of the iPhone in September for somewhere between $249 and $299. Unfortunately, the article doesn't state <em>where</em> this flavor of the iPhone will be sold. An important omission given that September is the same rumored delivery for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/29/quanta-wins-order-for-2nd-iphone/">Quanta's iPhone variant</a> meant specifically for non-US markets. Of course, that would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/">too early</a> according to (some) JP Morgan analysts although Kevin Chang, and his vision of an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/">iPhone nano</a>, would surely disagree. To muddle things further, Wintek was just fingered as the supplier of panels for future <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/11/touch-screen-ipods-by-august/">touch-screen iPods</a> set to launch in August. However, <em>DigiTimes</em> sources are now reporting that the iPod's capacitive touch-screen will be "less complicated" than the panel used for the current iPhone. No multi-touch? Who knows. Man, rumor mongering is a silly business... interesting, but silly.<br /><br />P.S. Yes, that's a mock-up to the right.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/">Second generation iPhone for $249 in September?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070716VL200.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/942382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/17/second-generation-iphone-for-249-in-september/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>commercial times</category><category>CommercialTimes</category><category>digitimes</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>rumor</category><category>taiwan</category><category>wintek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JP Morgan retracts iPhone nano insinuations, hints at 3G flavor in 2008]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-now-says-no-to-near-term-nano-iphone/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-10-07-iphone_rebuttal.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Oh c'mon, it did sound too good to be true, did it not? To just about everyone's chagrin, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/">hope-filled comments</a> made yesterday by Kevin Chang have now been retracted by JP Morgan, and it looks like the iPhone nano will return to the depths of our imagination for the moment. According to a rebuttal put forth by the North America Equity Research division, the firm "has not been able to independently confirm" his comments with a second source, and also mentions that "a lower-end <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a> appearing in the near-term would be unusual and highly risky." Notably, putting the rumors to rest wasn't the only order of business in the writeup, as it was suggested numerous times throughout the document that JP Morgan believes a "high-priced, non-subsidized <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/iphone-might-have-3g-switched-on-via-upgrade-probably-not/">3G model</a>" will surface "in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/23/3g-iphone-on-track-for-early-08/">first half of 2008</a>." Squashing one piece of scuttlebutt whilst conjuring up another (entirely more probable) report, now that's the way we like it.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/atandt/" rel="tag">ATT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gsm/" rel="tag">GSM</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gprs/" rel="tag">GPRS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/edge/" rel="tag">EDGE</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/os-x/" rel="tag">iPhone OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/">JP Morgan retracts iPhone nano insinuations, hints at 3G flavor in 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-now-says-no-to-near-term-nano-iphone/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/937310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>atandt</category><category>att</category><category>edge</category><category>gsm</category><category>incorrect</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>iphone os</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>iphoneos</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>mobile</category><category>nano</category><category>retract</category><category>retraction</category><category>rumor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano rumors heating up, destined for Q4?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070709/apple_nanophone.html?.v=2"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-9-07-iphonenano.jpg" /></a>While analysts have been <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/06/19/apple-prepping-a-cheaper-iphone-probably/">speculating</a> that Apple may unleash a smaller (and cheaper) handset in the not too distant future in order to grab a sect of market share not interested in the relatively pricey <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a>, the rumors are seeming to gain traction. According to Kevin Chang, a JP Morgan analyst based in Taiwan, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> is actually looking to "launch a cheaper version of the iPhone in the fourth quarter that could be based on its iPod nano music player." The report cited anonymous sources "in the supply channel" and also referenced the now-famed patent that suggests such a device could be materializing. Still, we'd highly recommend taking all of this in with a healthy heap of salt for the time being, but don't be incredibly shocked if your next <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPodnano/">iPod nano</a> unexpectedly rings while you're stereotypically browsing through <em>Gorillaz</em> tracks.<br /><br />[Thanks, Matt, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.informationarchitects.jp/iphone-nano-iphone-shuffle">InformationArchitects</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/">iPhone nano rumors heating up, destined for Q4?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070709/apple_nanophone.html?.v=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/936419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>mini iphone</category><category>MiniIphone</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>smaller iphone</category><category>SmallerIphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone nano rumors heating up, destined for Q4?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070709/apple_nanophone.html?.v=2"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-9-07-iphonenano.jpg" /></a>While analysts have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/19/apple-prepping-a-cheaper-iphone-probably/">speculating</a> that Apple may unleash a smaller (and cheaper) handset in the not too distant future in order to grab a sect of market share not interested in the relatively pricey <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a>, the rumors are seeming to gain traction. According to Kevin Chang, a JP Morgan analyst based in Taiwan, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> is actually looking to "launch a cheaper version of the iPhone in the fourth quarter that could be based on its iPod nano music player." The report cited anonymous sources "in the supply channel" and also referenced the now-famed patent that suggests such a device could be materializing. Still, we'd highly recommend taking all of this in with a healthy heap of salt for the time being, but don't be incredibly shocked if your next <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPodnano/">iPod nano</a> unexpectedly rings while you're stereotypically browsing through <em>Gorillaz</em> tracks.<br /><br />[Thanks, Matt, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.informationarchitects.jp/iphone-nano-iphone-shuffle">InformationArchitects</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/">iPhone nano rumors heating up, destined for Q4?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070709/apple_nanophone.html?.v=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/936418/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone nano</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>mini iphone</category><category>MiniIphone</category><category>mobile</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>smaller iphone</category><category>SmallerIphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The 'iPhone nano' patent surfaces]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2007/07/05/simple-and-cheap-iphone-for-your-grandma/#more-649"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/apple-iphone-simple.jpg" /></a> <br /></div>
Although the iPhone is really a wonderful piece of tech-beauty (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/03/iphone-review/">in form, and partially in function</a>), there are probably market needs for an Apple-esque handset that is not packed with so many features. The above concept image shows an intriguing possible solution to this market need, as it appears that the design is <em>all-iPod </em>(not iPhone). We like the iPod design with a phone thrown into the mix <em>ala</em> click wheel; we really do. We'd love to see this device from Apple as the iPhone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/08/first-looks-ipod-nano-it-sure-is-small-and-it-sure-is-cool/">nano</a>, and with a patent recently on a "touch pad with symbols based mode," maybe the iPhone nano is on its way. For the legit needs of a cellphone simpleton, this may just fir the bill if it ever materializes.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/">The 'iPhone nano' patent surfaces</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.unwiredview.com/2007/07/05/simple-and-cheap-iphone-for-your-grandma/#more-649>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/933728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/the-iphone-nano-patent-surfaces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>iPhone</category><category>iPhone counterfeit</category><category>iPhone cpncept</category><category>iPhone nano</category><category>IphoneCounterfeit</category><category>IphoneCpncept</category><category>IphoneNano</category><category>iPod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
