<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Mobile Miscellany: week of April 23rd, 2012]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/"><img alt="Mobile Miscellany: week of April 23rd, 2012" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/mm-1335607051.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> Not all mobile news is destined for the front page, but if you're like us and really want to know what's going on, then you've come to the right place. This past week, we learned that ZTE intends to release a phablet of its own, and Samsung unseated Nokia as the world's largest supplier of mobile phones. These stories and more await after the break. So buy the ticket and take the ride as we explore the "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mm">best of the rest</a>" for this week of April 23rd, 2012.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mobile Miscellany: week of April 23rd, 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/">Mobile Miscellany: week of April 23rd, 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20226418/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/mobile-miscellany-week-of-april-23rd-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>att</category><category>australia</category><category>boost</category><category>boost mobile</category><category>BoostMobile</category><category>clearwire</category><category>comscore</category><category>cricket</category><category>droid 4</category><category>droid bionic</category><category>Droid4</category><category>DroidBionic</category><category>earnings</category><category>financial</category><category>financials</category><category>finland</category><category>google play</category><category>google play movies</category><category>GooglePlay</category><category>GooglePlayMovies</category><category>htc</category><category>htc radar</category><category>HtcRadar</category><category>isuppli</category><category>japan</category><category>leap</category><category>leap wireless</category><category>LeapWireless</category><category>lte</category><category>lumia 900</category><category>Lumia900</category><category>minecraft</category><category>mm</category><category>mobile miscellany</category><category>MobileMiscellany</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>motorola droid 4</category><category>motorola droid bionic</category><category>MotorolaDroid4</category><category>MotorolaDroidBionic</category><category>nokia</category><category>nokia lumia 900</category><category>NokiaLumia900</category><category>phablet</category><category>q1-2012</category><category>radar</category><category>salt lake city</category><category>SaltLakeCity</category><category>samsung</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>sprint</category><category>virgin</category><category>virgin mobile</category><category>VirginMobile</category><category>wimax</category><category>zte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flat-panel TV shipments to fall for the first time ever in 2012?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/"><img alt="flat panel TV" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/panasonic-tv-2012-03-19.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 355px;" /></a></div>The past fourteen or so years have been a great run for flat-panel TV sales, but according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IHS/">IHS</a> (formerly iSuppli), that run is finally going to turn in the down direction in 2012. The expected drop off is predicted to be five percent, which still leaves the total TVs sold in 2012 at 37.1 million, more than a few dollars for sure. The fact that last year saw a modest one percent raise is as good of an indicator as any that the good times are over. Of course this is but a single prediction from a single analyst firm and we'll all have to wait until the year is over and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/earnings">earnings</a> are announced to know anything for certain.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Flat-panel TV shipments to fall for the first time ever in 2012?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/">Flat-panel TV shipments to fall for the first time ever in 2012?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20202416/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/28/flat-panel-tv-shipments-to-fall-for-the-first-time-ever-in-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>flat panel</category><category>FlatPanel</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>HDTV</category><category>IHS</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>plasma</category><category>projection</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OEMs to spend more on semiconductors for wireless devices than computers in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-than-for-computers-in-2011---semiconductor-market-research-at-isuppli.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Well, if you didn't believe that we live in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/editorial-its-apples-post-pc-world-were-all-just-living/">post-PC world</a> before, the latest report from <em>IHS iSuppli </em>should help persuade you. According to its research, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) will have spent $55.4 billion on semiconductors for phones and tablets in 2011, as compared to just $53.1 billion on PC silicon. Of course, as the chart above shows, OEMs spent more money on wireless devices in 2008 and 2009. But, after an interlude of PC primacy in 2010, it looks like mobile's where the money's at for the foreseeable future -- can't say we didn't warn you.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>OEMs to spend more on semiconductors for wireless devices than computers in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/">OEMs to spend more on semiconductors for wireless devices than computers in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20016883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/14/oems-to-spend-more-on-semiconductors-for-wireless-devices-than-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>global</category><category>IHS isuppli</category><category>IhsIsuppli</category><category>isuppli</category><category>oem</category><category>pc</category><category>pcs</category><category>Semiconductor</category><category>semiconductor purchasing</category><category>SemiconductorPurchasing</category><category>slate</category><category>smartphone</category><category>tablet</category><category>wireless devices</category><category>WirelessDevices</category><category>worldwide</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP TouchPad parts analyzed, manufacturing cost similar to the iPad 2]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/"><img alt="HP TouchPad manufacturing parts analyzed, costs about as much to build as the iPad 2" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/touchpad-teardown-2011-06-30-600.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></div>
We know what's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30/hp-touchpad-torn-asunder-no-palms-found-hiding-within/">inside the TouchPad</a> and we know just what it's like to live with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/hp-touchpad-review/">culmination of those parts</a>, and now Isuppli is doing its best to figure out just what those individual components set HP back each time one rolls off the assembly line. According to that firm's analysis, the grand cost to build a single $599.99 MSRP, 32GB TouchPad is $328. That's but $12 more than the 16GB version, which of course retails for $100 less at $499.99. That $328 cost is quite comparable to a 32GB <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/09/ipad-2-review/">iPad 2</a>, which tallies up at $326 in 3G form according to the source. In other words, HP seems to be maintaining similar margins to Apple, begging the question: can it afford to do so?<br />
<br />
[Image credit: <a href="http://www.techrepublic.com/photos/cracking-open-the-hp-touchpad/6253940?seq=2&amp;tag=thumbnail-view-selector;get-photo-roto">TechRepublic</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/">HP TouchPad parts analyzed, manufacturing cost similar to the iPad 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19985815/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/hp-touchpad-parts-analyzed-manufacturing-cost-similar-to-the-ip/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cost</category><category>hp</category><category>isuppli</category><category>manufacturing cost</category><category>ManufacturingCost</category><category>tablet</category><category>teardown</category><category>touchpad</category><category>webos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vizio starts celebrating 2010 LCD sales wins early, has bigger plans for 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/viziotabletrosebowlleakengadget.jpg" /></a></div>
Industry analysts will reveal all the numbers later this week but according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Vizio/">Vizio</a> its LCD HDTVs have outsold all others, again. Specifically, it has again rated as the #1 seller of LCDs in North America according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/displaysearch">DisplaySearch</a> and #1 seller of LCDs in the US according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">iSuppli</a> by carving out a 27.6% share of the market, the largest for any seller since 2004. We spoke with Randy Waynick, Vizio's chief sales officer (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/02/vizio-teases-entry-into-the-tablet-fray-with-pizazz-via-rose-bow/">star of that tablet-exposing Rose Bowl ad</a>) and found Vizio's telling a very different tale about HDTV sales in 2010 than some of the competition. <br />
<br />
In contrast to lower than expected sales <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/best-buy-sees-big-drop-in-tv-sales-eases-pain-with-beefy-mobile/">from other manufacturers and retailers last year</a>, especially when it came to 3D televisions and connected TV products, he claims demand was so high for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/16/vizios-65-inch-theater-3d-tv-with-passive-glasses-is-official/">new Theater 3D HDTV</a> with passive glasses they couldn't keep it in stock. He also attributed much of the sales growth to its strategy of offering higher end tech like local dimming LED backlighting and WiFi built in at lower prices than the competition, and plans to use its position as a market leader to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/vizio-shows-off-its-full-2010-lineup-ultrawidescreen-3d-googl/">push technology initiatives</a> -- like passive 3D screens, where he <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/lg-display-shows-why-it-thinks-3dtv-has-a-shot-with-passive-glas/">echoed LG's claims</a> that it tested far better than active shutter 3D with customers -- rather than follow them. Among some of us in the home theater community there's still, deserved or undeserved, a perception of the company as simply a cheap, low end manufacturer that's not as reliable as others but with results like these it looks like the rest of the market will be the ones with something to prove in 2011.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/">Vizio starts celebrating 2010 LCD sales wins early, has bigger plans for 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19853147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/vizio-starts-celebrating-2010-lcd-sales-wins-early-has-bigger-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3dtv</category><category>displaysearch</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>local dimming</category><category>LocalDimming</category><category>passive lcd</category><category>PassiveLcd</category><category>randy waynick</category><category>RandyWaynick</category><category>sales</category><category>theater 3d</category><category>Theater3d</category><category>via</category><category>via plus</category><category>ViaPlus</category><category>vizio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iTunes stays on top of growing internet movie business in 2010, but 2011 could be very different]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/apple-tv-new-remote-2.jpg" /></a></div>
While much of the news lately has surrounded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/watchinstantly/">subscription</a> internet movie and TV services the video on-demand market was up nearly 40% last year and is expected to keep growing. According to stats from IHS Screen Digest, video revenue for the Apple <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/itunes/">iTunes</a> store grew 60 percent last year, but saw its overall market share shrink from 74.4 to 64.5 percent. This is mostly explained as a side affect of the Kinect driving up Microsoft Xbox 360 sales at the end of last year and introducing its Zune store to a new market of families looking for digital entertainment. The up and comer to watch for 2011 appears to be the Wal-mart/Vudu combo, currently fourth in line behind Sony but poised to grow by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/21/vudu-2-0-interface-moves-beyond-ps3-and-boxee-box-now-available-o/">showing up on more devices</a> and increasing its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/02/vudu-wal-mart-and-disney-join-forces-add-a-free-streaming-copy/">promotional efforts</a>. Of course, as <em>NewTeeVee </em>points out, the ultimate wild card in all of this is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/six-major-studios-to-distribute-ultraviolet-titles-by-mid-year/">launch of Ultraviolet buy-once/watch-anywhere DRM later this year</a> (without support from Apple or Disney) and the effect it could have by causing consumers to see digital downloads as a viable option instead of the fragmented mess they are now -- good luck with that.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Aaron]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/">iTunes stays on top of growing internet movie business in 2010, but 2011 could be very different</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19835683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/itunes-stays-on-top-of-growing-internet-movie-business-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>ihs screen digest</category><category>IhsScreenDigest</category><category>internet video</category><category>InternetVideo</category><category>isuppli</category><category>itunes</category><category>market share</category><category>MarketShare</category><category>playstation network</category><category>PlaystationNetwork</category><category>ps3</category><category>psn</category><category>sony</category><category>ultraviolet</category><category>video on demand</category><category>VideoOnDemand</category><category>vod</category><category>vudu</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell moves back up to #2 position in global PC sales, Acer slips to 3rd, HP still reigns supreme]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/isuppli-2010-09-04-600.jpg"  alt="Dell moves back up to #2 position in global PC sales, Acer slips to 3rd, HP still reigns supreme" /></a></div>
Acer Chairman JT Wang is quick to say that he thinks that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a> sales are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/23/acers-jt-wang-ipads-market-share-will-drop-to-about-20-percen/">only going down from here</a>, but maybe he should listen to that age-old idiom: people in fragile economies shouldn't throw stones. According to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">iSuppli</a>'s latest report on the global PC market, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/acer">Acer</a> slipped down to third place after losing 6.2 percent of its market share compared to last quarter. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dell">Dell</a>, meanwhile, lost a relatively slim 1.2 percent of its share, bumping it back up to second place -- a position it had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/acer-partially-fulfills-prophecy-overtakes-dell-as-number-two-p/">previously given up to Acer</a>. Meanwhile <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hp">HP</a> still sits on top, commanding 18.1 percent of the market share, though that too is down, 6.3 percent over last quarter. Still, all three are well up over last year, an encouraging sign in these supposedly troubling times.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/">Dell moves back up to #2 position in global PC sales, Acer slips to 3rd, HP still reigns supreme</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19621248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/04/dell-moves-back-up-to-2-position-in-global-pc-sales-acer-slips/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acer</category><category>dell</category><category>economy</category><category>global pc market</category><category>global pc sales</category><category>GlobalPcMarket</category><category>GlobalPcSales</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>isuppli</category><category>market</category><category>pc sales</category><category>PcSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli finds worldwide cellphone shipments are up 13.8 percent, Motorola's share slipping]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/isuppli-motorola-05-17-2010.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">We've already seen Motorola's market share slip a bit when it comes to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/comscore-samsung-edges-out-motorola-in-us-mobile-market-share/">US cellphone shipments</a>, and it looks like the news is even worse for the company on a global scale. According to iSuppli's latest numbers -- which back up some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/30/apple-1-us-phone-manufacturer-rim-enters-top-5-worldwide-moto/">earlier reports</a> -- while worldwide cellphone shipments rose a healthy 13.8 percent in the first quarter of 2010, Motorola slipped from sixth to eighth spot in the global rankings, selling a total of 8.5 million phones compared to 14.7 million during the same period a year earlier. As you can see in the helpful chart above (with sales indicated in thousands), Motorola's loss came largely at the expense of considerable gains from market leaders Nokia and Samsung, with LG, RIM and Apple also seeing some smaller but significant gains. And, yes, this news also means that Motorola is also now in a neck and neck race with <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/zte">ZTE</a>, for what it's worth.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Katie]</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/">iSuppli finds worldwide cellphone shipments are up 13.8 percent, Motorola's share slipping</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 17 May 2010 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19480699/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/isuppli-finds-worldwide-cellphone-shipments-are-up-motorolas-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphone shipments</category><category>cellphones</category><category>CellphoneShipments</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lg</category><category>market share</category><category>MarketShare</category><category>motorola</category><category>nokia</category><category>rim</category><category>samsung</category><category>worldwide</category><category>zte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli pegs iPad component costs at as little as $259.60]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2010/tc2010046_788280.htm"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/blendtec-ipad-04052010.jpg" /></a></div>
This shouldn't come as a shock to anyone: just because Apple's touting  the "magical" $499 pricepoint of the iPad doesn't mean they're selling  it at a loss. After carefully poring over the iPad's internals, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli</a> has  waved its hands in the air and added up a thoroughly guesstimated bill  of materials as low as $259.60 for the 16GB iPad, including $95 for  screen and $26.80 for the A4 processor. Sure, we suppose we can believe  that, although that number doesn't really explina the final price tag,  since it fails to include include gigantic costs like, oh, say,  "development." The good news for us is that there's actually a lot more  complexity inside the iPad than iSuppli was expecting, and that means  the raw component prices might come down over time as things like the  three-chip touchscreen controller get simplified over time. What might  seem silly and wasteful at $499 could seem all-too-tempting at $299.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/">iSuppli pegs iPad component costs at as little as $259.60</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19429817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/07/isuppli-pegs-ipad-component-costs-at-as-little-as-259-60/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>ipad</category><category>isuppli</category><category>materials</category><category>parts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Droid more valuable than Nexus One or iPhone 3GS according to iSuppli]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.isuppli.com/News/Pages/iSuppli-Does-Droid-Teardown-Finds-$18775-Bill-of-Materials-and-Manufacturing-Cost.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/moto-droid-slid-out-230.jpg" /></a>Ah, here we go again: another <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">report from iSuppli</a> breaking down the bill of materials (BOM) for one of our favorite smartphones. This time it's the Droid / Milestone under scrutiny, Motorola's beefcake slider that currently sells for $560 month-to-month on Verizon ($199 on contract). According to iSuppli's analysis, Droid brings a $187.75 bill of materials that breaks down into $179.11 worth of components and $8.64 in manufacturing costs. Naturally, the BOM does not include licensing fees, software costs, accessories, or the massive outlay this device has received in advertising support. Nevertheless, it makes for interesting apples-to-apples fodder when comparing costs with the Nexus One (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/">$174.15</a> in materials only), iPhone 3GS (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/">$178.96</a> materials and manufacturing), and original Palm Pre (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/">$138</a> materials and manufacturing). The single most expensive component on the Droid is the 16GB removable microSD card ($35) bundled with the Droid. And after a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/moto-gives-straight-advice-on-smartphone-touchscreen-quality/">controversial MOTO report</a> that demonstrated a lackluster capacitive touchscreen on the Droid, it's interesting to compare the Droid's 3.7-inch TFT LCD ($17.75) and capacitive touchscreen overlay ($17.50) with that of the iPhone 3GS ($19.25 spent on a smaller 3.5-inch LCD and cheaper $16 touchscreen overlay) and Nexus One (whopping $23.50 for 3.7-inch AM-OLED display and $17.50 for the touchscreen assembly). Rounding out the top-end costs are the Droid's 5 megapixel autofocus CMOS sensor ($14.25), Qualcomm baseband processor / RF chip ($14.04), and TI application processor ($12.90).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/">Droid more valuable than Nexus One or iPhone 3GS according to iSuppli</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19317938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/15/droid-more-valuable-than-nexus-one-or-iphone-3gs-according-to-is/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>bom</category><category>cost</category><category>costs</category><category>droid</category><category>isuppli</category><category>manufaturing</category><category>motorola</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nexus One hardware costs $174.15, US multitouch still priceless]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/8jan10icuebfw.jpg" />If, while perusing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/nexus-one-teardown-reveals-possible-802-11n-radio-and-fm-transmi/">the Nexus One teardown</a>, you were doing a mental tally of just how much each internal part may cost, here's your chance to compare your numbers to some professionally obtained figures. <em>iSuppli</em> reports a preliminary estimate of $174.15 for the cost of materials needed to build each handset. The research firm also congratulates Google on keeping a bill of materials comparable to most recent smartphones while having "the most advanced features of any smart phone ever dissected by iSuppli's Teardown Analysis Service." Costliest of all things was the 1GHz Snapdragon ($30.50), followed by the AMOLED display ($23.50) and memory ($20.40) from Samsung. The Bluetooth and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/google-nexus-one-not-supporting-802-11n-for-the-time-being/">802.11n WiFi transceiver</a> cost $8.20, and perhaps the most egregious spend was $12.50 on a 5 megapixel camera that many of us might never use. Hilariously enough, Google has spent $17.50 on what is clearly identified as a "capacitive multitouch touchscreen assembly" from Synaptics, though enabling it clearly remains <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/08/andy-rubin-on-multitouch-in-android-i-personally-dont-like-tw/">a bridge too far</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/">Nexus One hardware costs $174.15, US multitouch still priceless</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19310159/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/nexus-one-hardware-costs-174-15-us-multitouch-still-priceless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>cost</category><category>costs</category><category>google</category><category>isuppli</category><category>manufacture</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>materials</category><category>nexus</category><category>nexus one</category><category>NexusOne</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIZIO keeps the LCD TV crown in Q2, but Samsung is closing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/08/isuppliq2.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/10/u-s-customs-sees-it-vizios-way-tvs-to-keep-flowing-in/">Injunctions</a>, hail, sleet or snow, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vizio">VIZIO</a> kept shipping its LCD HDTVs in large amounts during the second quarter, enough of them to account for 21.7% of the market, according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">iSuppli</a>. That was enough to narrowly hold off Samsung, which saw its numbers rise sharply from 17.8% in the previous quarter to 21.3%, reportedly due to its introduction and marketing of new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung,led">LED sets</a>, which contributed to 2.2 percent of all LCDs sold during the period. The analysts also see a growing trend of customers coming back for their second flat panel television to replace an older one, just the kind of people it thinks might gravitate towards features like skinny, power efficient LED designs. We'll see if that's enough to swing the balance Samsung's way, or if customers stick with VIZIO's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/vizio-internet-app-hdtvs-launch-later-this-year-for-less-than-y/">approach</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/08-19-2009/0005079868&amp;EDATE=">Read</a> - VIZIO Again Ranked #1 in U.S. LCD HDTV Shipments<br /><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20655">Read</a> - Samsung Cuts Into Vizio's Lead in U.S. LCD TV Market in Second Quarter<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lg/" rel="tag">LG</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/panasonic/" rel="tag">Panasonic</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sharp/" rel="tag">Sharp</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/toshiba/" rel="tag">Toshiba</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/">VIZIO keeps the LCD TV crown in Q2, but Samsung is closing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19137770/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/23/vizio-keeps-the-lcd-tv-crown-in-q2-but-samsung-is-closing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>led</category><category>lg</category><category>market share</category><category>MarketShare</category><category>others</category><category>panasonic</category><category>q2</category><category>sales</category><category>samsung</category><category>sharp</category><category>shipments</category><category>sony</category><category>toshiba</category><category>vizio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Energy Star 3.0 regulations set to impact TV designs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/2-7-08-energy-star-logo.jpg" alt="Energy Star logo" />If you thought there was a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/cea-rails-on-californias-proposed-tv-energy-standards-rings-do/">row</a> over the Energy Star 3.0 requirements for TVs, you haven't seen anything yet. Research firm iSuppli rightfully calls out some challenges for even the energy-miserly LCD TVs to duck under the numbers in the draft version of the Tier 2 (effective 2010) and Tier 3 (effective 2012) versions of the standard. For example, a 50-inch TV will have do limbo underneath a 153-Watt peak for Tier 2 compliance and 108-Watts for Tier 3. We're confident that some clever engineering will allow LCD to reach those figures; the real impact might be on plasma TVs, however. It pains us to say it, but plasma's going to have a hard time making that grade; of course, that's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/plasma-market-getting-smaller-and-higher-end-but-its-still-her/">assuming</a> that plasma TVs are still being made and marketed towards consumers who value the Energy Star label. For those of us who want efficiency and ultimate image quality, it's time to pull for LED-backlit LCDs.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod_development/revisions/downloads/television/Final_Draft%20_Versions_4_and_5_ENERGY_STAR_TV_Specification.pdf">Read</a> - Energy Star TV requirements draft [Warning: PDF link]<br /> <a href="http://www.twice.com/article/316692-New_Energy_Star_Rules_Will_Change_LCD_TV_Designs.php">Read</a> - iSuppli predicts change in LCD design<br /> <br /><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/">Energy Star 3.0 regulations set to impact TV designs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19117875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/03/energy-star-3-0-regulations-set-to-impact-tv-designs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efficiency</category><category>electricity</category><category>energy star</category><category>EnergyStar</category><category>epa</category><category>green</category><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS: $179 to build says iSuppli]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20398"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/3gs-teardown-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">iSuppli's just released its estimated cost of Apple's newest offering, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone3GS/">iPhone 3GS</a>. Total costs for the 16GB model costs $178.96 to manufacture, according to them -- give or take $4.63 more than the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">8GB iPhone 3G estimate</a> from last year. It's also about $40 more than iSuppli's most recent manufacturing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/">estimate for the Palm Pre</a>. The estimate covers only materials, and doesn't take into account various costs such as <span name="spanContent" id="spanContent">shipping and distribution, packaging, royalty fees or all the miscellaneous accessories included with each handset. Regardless, it definitely looks like Apple's managed to step up the innards of the phone without a significant bump in costs. <br /></span></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/atandt/" rel="tag">ATT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/">iPhone 3GS: $179 to build says iSuppli</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20398>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19076813/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g s</category><category>3gs</category><category>apple</category><category>atandt</category><category>att</category><category>bom</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g s</category><category>iphone 3gs</category><category>Iphone3gs</category><category>isuppli</category><category>manufacturing costs</category><category>ManufacturingCosts</category><category>mobile</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS: $179 to build says iSuppli]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20398"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/3gs-teardown-rm-eng.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">iSuppli's just released its estimated cost of Apple's newest offering, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPhone3GS/">iPhone 3GS</a>. Total costs for the 16GB model costs $178.96 to manufacture, according to them -- give or take $4.63 more than the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">8GB iPhone 3G estimate</a> from last year. It's also about $40 more than iSuppli's most recent manufacturing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/">estimate for the Palm Pre</a>. The estimate covers only materials, and doesn't take into account various costs such as <span name="spanContent" id="spanContent">shipping and distribution, packaging, royalty fees or all the miscellaneous accessories included with each handset. Regardless, it definitely looks like Apple's managed to step up the innards of the phone without a significant bump in costs. <br /></span></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/">iPhone 3GS: $179 to build says iSuppli</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20398>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19076757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/24/iphone-3gs-179-to-build-says-isuppli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g s</category><category>3gs</category><category>apple</category><category>bom</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g s</category><category>iphone 3gs</category><category>Iphone3gs</category><category>isuppli</category><category>manufacturing costs</category><category>ManufacturingCosts</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli sees TV sales continuing to expand despite the economy, Samsung keeps the overall lead]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/newsdetail.aspx?id=20263&amp;itemtitle=in+uncertain+times%2c+u.s.+consumers+turn+to+television&amp;twit"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/2009-05-26_tv12.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Even the economy can't keep HDTV sales down, according to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">iSuppli's</a> research. In lieu of travel and going out, we're buying bigger TVs to stay home and watch, with sales of flat panel displays in the $600 - $999 range rising the fastest, while Wal-mart is very close to catching Best Buy in marketshare. Samsung's plasma sales <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/">kept it</a> narrowly in the overall lead over upstart (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/11/flat-panel-tv-sales-jump-23-over-last-year-vizio-leads-the-way/">new LCD champ</a>) Vizio, but we'll have to wait and see how long that lasts.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090527/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_techbit_tv_sales">Yahoo Tech</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/plasma/" rel="tag">Plasma</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/">iSuppli sees TV sales continuing to expand despite the economy, Samsung keeps the overall lead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 21:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/newsdetail.aspx?id=20263&amp;itemtitle=in+uncertain+times%2c+u.s.+consumers+turn+to+television&amp;twit>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19050918/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/28/isuppli-sees-tv-sales-continuing-to-expand-despite-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysis</category><category>analyst</category><category>best buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>others</category><category>plasma</category><category>sales</category><category>samsung</category><category>vizio</category><category>wal-mart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Palm Pre: $138 to build according to iSuppli]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090428_685394.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/palm-pre-webos-20090114-600.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">With the economy in the tank (still) and the heat on, cost and profit margins are more important than ever to companies hoping to stave off the inevitable, apocalyptic doom of recession. Well, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli's</a> released an estimated report of how much its costing Palm to cobble together the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/hub/palm-pre">Pre</a> -- about $138, as it turns out. iSuppli has positively identified just two of the Pre's suppliers thus far -- that Texas Instruments OMAP chip, which runs Palm $11, and Qualcomm's wireless chip -- but they've formed a general picture of what's under the hood for the estimate. That price is about 46 percent of the $300 iSuppli suggests Palm will be charging Sprint for the Pre (a number that's completely unconfirmed at this point). To put it in perspective, the BlackBerry Storm costs <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/">about $203 to make</a> and was sold for $199 initially, the G1 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">clocked in</a> at $144, while the iPhone 3G <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">costs Apple an estimated $174.33</a>. Of course, we have no way of assessing the accuracy of the estimate yet, but if it's in the neighborhood of correct, Palm's profit margin should be pretty healthy.</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/palm-os/" rel="tag">Palm OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/">Palm Pre: $138 to build according to iSuppli</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090428_685394.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1531652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>cost</category><category>costs</category><category>isuppli</category><category>mobile</category><category>palm</category><category>palm os</category><category>palm pre</category><category>palmos</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>pre</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Palm Pre: $138 to build according to iSuppli]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090428_685394.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/palm-pre-webos-20090114-600.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">With the economy in the tank (still) and the heat on, cost and profit margins are more important than ever to companies hoping to stave off the inevitable, apocalyptic doom of recession. Well, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli's</a> released an estimated report of how much its costing Palm to cobble together the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/hub/palm-pre">Pre</a> -- about $138, as it turns out. iSuppli has positively identified just two of the Pre's suppliers thus far -- that Texas Instruments OMAP chip, which runs Palm $11, and Qualcomm's wireless chip -- but they've formed a general picture of what's under the hood for the estimate. That price is about 46 percent of the $300 iSuppli suggests Palm will be charging Sprint for the Pre (a number that's completely unconfirmed at this point). To put it in perspective, the BlackBerry Storm costs <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/">about $203 to make</a> and was sold for $199 initially, the G1 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">clocked in</a> at $144, while the iPhone 3G <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">costs Apple an estimated $174.33</a>. Of course, we have no way of assessing the accuracy of the estimate yet, but if it's in the neighborhood of correct, Palm's profit margin should be pretty healthy.</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/">Palm Pre: $138 to build according to iSuppli</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090428_685394.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1531649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/palm-pre-138-to-build-according-to-isuppli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>cost</category><category>costs</category><category>isuppli</category><category>palm</category><category>palm pre</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>pre</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli: $359 Kindle 2 costs $185 to build, Whispernet says shhh]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/isuppli-kindle-2-bom-22apr09.jpg" alt="" /></div>
Ever wonder how Amazon was able to bundle unlimited Whispernet (Sprint EVDO) with the Kindle 2? To start with, eBooks are small, <span style="font-style: italic;">really</span> small in the context of digital media downloads (music, audio-books, movies) so there's little impact to the Sprint network. Kindle 2 is also sporting a pretty healthy markup to cover the data fees. After conducting its own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/kindle-2-dissected-found-to-contain-space-for-a-sim-card/">teardown</a> and analysis, iSuppli estimates that the Kindle 2 costs just $185.49 for materials and manufacturing. The estimate does not include the costs related to marketing, distribution, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/kindle-2-users-complain-of-eye-strain-mull-over-possible-soluti/">class-actions</a>, or the pain you feel at having learned the true definition of <em>free</em>. Full press release after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>iSuppli: $359 Kindle 2 costs $185 to build, Whispernet says shhh</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/">iSuppli: $359 Kindle 2 costs $185 to build, Whispernet says shhh</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1524551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/isuppli-359-kindle-2-costs-185-to-build-whispernet-says-shhh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>bom</category><category>costs</category><category>isuppli</category><category>kindle</category><category>kindle 2</category><category>Kindle2</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$22 iPod Shuffle shocker: components tiny, inexpensive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/090413-ipodshuffle3g-01.jpg" /><br />
<div align="left">When iSuppli recently reported that the parts and packaging of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/ipod-shuffle-teardown-guts-weigh-just-10-more-than-sheet-of-pa/">iPod Shuffle 3G</a> cost only $21.77, a mere twenty-eight percent of the unit's retail price, <em>PMP Today</em> asked a most reasonable question: Where are the new Shuffle <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/17/luxpro-finally-countersues-apple-for-killing-the-super-tangent-i/">KIRFs</a>? According to <em>Business Week</em>, Samsung is making a killing on these things, supplying not only the unit's ARM-based processor ($5.98), but the storage ($6) on at least a few of the units as well. The lithium ion battery, described by iSuppli as "the smallest we've ever seen," has an asking price of $1.20. As for things like capacitors and resistors, they're being described as "about the size of a grain of salt" and cost fractions of a penny each. Of course, none of this takes into account things like paying engineers and designers, and royalties paid to patents owned by other companies. Not that the KIRFsters of Shenzhen worry about these sorts of things. Maybe the wherewithal required to produce a phony Shuffle is (for the time being) beyond the capabilities of the pirates? Or maybe they're just having too much fun cranking out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/05/keepin-it-real-fake-part-cxcvi-nokla-5800-xpressmusic-is-actu/">NOKLAs</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2009/04/12/ipod-shuffle-3g-costs-22-to-make-where-are-the-clones/">Read</a> - iPod Shuffle 3G Costs $22 to Make: Where are the Clones?<br /><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090410_507831.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_technology">Read</a> - Deconstructing Apple's Tiny iPod Shuffle<br /></div>
<br /><br /></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/">$22 iPod Shuffle shocker: components tiny, inexpensive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1515333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/22-ipod-shuffle-shocker-components-tiny-inexpensive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>arm</category><category>ipod shuffle</category><category>IpodShuffle</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>samsung</category><category>shuffle</category><category>tear down</category><category>tear-down</category><category>TearDown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel rated leading chip manufacturer again, AMD slips out of top ten]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/161118/intel_kept_global_chip_crown_in_2008_amd_fell_from_top_ten.html?tk=rss_news"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intel-crown-amd-frown-20090312-5.jpg" alt="Intel rated leading chip manufacturer again, AMD slips out of top ten" /></a><br /></div>
This economic crisis has been tough for nearly every business worldwide, perhaps best evidenced by the number of corporate spats we've seen develop lately as everyone gets more and more protective of their respective turfs. While Intel and NVIDIA have lately been engaged in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel,nvidia">epic war of PowerPoint</a> presentations, fewer disputes have been bigger or longer-running than the one between Intel and its more direct competition, AMD. That "us inside" company just earned some bragging rights, being named the biggest processor manufacturer in the world again by iSuppli, with a 13.1 percent global market share. AMD, which came in tenth last year, dropped down to the number twelve position in 2008 after its revenue declined 7.8 percent compared to 2007. News was also bad for Texas Instruments, which dropped a position largely thanks to the success of mobile processors from Toshiba and Qualcomm. Don't be so glum, TI, maybe successes from Russell Crowe's favorite flavor of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/texasinstruments,picoprojector">pico projector</a> will make up for the difference.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/">Intel rated leading chip manufacturer again, AMD slips out of top ten</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/161118/intel_kept_global_chip_crown_in_2008_amd_fell_from_top_ten.html?tk=rss_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1486016/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/intel-still-leading-chip-manufacturer-amd-slips-out-of-top-ten/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>chip</category><category>economy</category><category>intel</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>marketshare</category><category>processor</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>texas instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>ti</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090128_050612.htm?chan=technology_technology%20index%20page_top%20stories"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/11/blackberry-storm-teardown.jpb.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
In a fiscal climate where profit margin reigns <em>intensely</em> supreme, we've got yet another dollop of bad news to heap upon the parfait of pain that is the $199 (after $50 mail in rebate) BlackBerry Storm. Research firm, iSuppli, estimates that the cost for the components and assembly of RIM's BlackBerry Storm are just shy of $203 -- an estimate that does not include software development and uh, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/26/rim-ceo-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/">bug fixing</a> costs or those attributed to patent licensing, physical distribution, marketing or anything else in the product lifecycle. The most costly component is the $35 Qualcomm MSM7600 processor that gives the Storm its dual GSM / CDMA personality. Now, $203 isn't that big of a spread compared to the per unit cost of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">$175</a> 8GB iPhone 3G, $169 BlackBerry Bold, or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">$144</a> T-Mobile G1. However, the lost <s>prophets</s> profits add up quickly when you've moved over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/27/verizon-touts-1-million-blackberry-storms-sold-to-date/">a million units globally</a>.<br /><br />P.S. We're not implying that RIM is losing money here (the price is obviously carrier subsidized), only that the Storm is likely less profitable than its peers. But without knowing what VZW pays on a per unit basis, we can't say for sure who's getting the fiscal-shaft.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/rim/" rel="tag">RIM</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/verizon-wireless/" rel="tag">Verizon Wireless</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/vodafone/" rel="tag">Vodafone</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gsm/" rel="tag">GSM</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/edge/" rel="tag">EDGE</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ev-do/" rel="tag">EV-DO</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hsdpa/" rel="tag">HSDPA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/umts/" rel="tag">UMTS</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cdma/" rel="tag">CDMA</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/blackberry-os/" rel="tag">BlackBerry OS</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/">iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090128_050612.htm?chan=technology_technology%20index%20page_top%20stories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1444225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry os</category><category>blackberry storm</category><category>blackberryos</category><category>BlackberryStorm</category><category>bom</category><category>cdma</category><category>edge</category><category>ev do</category><category>evdo</category><category>gsm</category><category>hsdpa</category><category>isuppli</category><category>mobile</category><category>research in motion</category><category>researchinmotion</category><category>rim</category><category>storm</category><category>umts</category><category>verizon wireless</category><category>verizonwireless</category><category>vodaphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090128_050612.htm?chan=technology_technology%20index%20page_top%20stories"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/11/blackberry-storm-teardown.jpb.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
In a fiscal climate where profit margin reigns <em>intensely</em> supreme, we've got yet another dollop of bad news to heap upon the parfait of pain that is the $199 (after $50 mail in rebate) BlackBerry Storm. Research firm, iSuppli, estimates that the cost for the components and assembly of RIM's BlackBerry Storm are just shy of $203 -- an estimate that does not include software development and uh, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/26/rim-ceo-buggy-smartphone-software-is-the-new-reality/">bug fixing</a> costs or those attributed to patent licensing, physical distribution, marketing or anything else in the product lifecycle. The most costly component is the $35 Qualcomm MSM7600 processor that gives the Storm its dual GSM / CDMA personality. Now, $203 isn't that big of a spread compared to the per unit cost of a <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">$175</a> 8GB iPhone 3G, $169 BlackBerry Bold, or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">$144</a> T-Mobile G1. However, the lost <s>prophets</s> profits add up quickly when you've moved over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/27/verizon-touts-1-million-blackberry-storms-sold-to-date/">a million units globally</a>.<br /><br />P.S. We're not implying that RIM is losing money here (the price is obviously carrier subsidized), only that the Storm is likely less profitable than its peers. But without knowing what VZW pays on a per unit basis, we can't say for sure who's getting the fiscal-shaft.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/">iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090128_050612.htm?chan=technology_technology%20index%20page_top%20stories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1444224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry storm</category><category>BlackberryStorm</category><category>bom</category><category>isuppli</category><category>rim</category><category>storm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PS3 teardown: 30% fewer parts, $300 cheaper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_technology"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/11/10-28-08-sony-ps3-console.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
When the gang at iSuppli <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/">first tore open a PlayStation 3</a> back in November 2006, they pegged the cost to build the $500 model was $805 in materials. Now they're back and looking inside the $400 version, which they estimate is $448.73 in parts -- still a loss leader for the company, but only by about one Ulysses S. Grant this time. The number of components has also dropped from 4,048 to just 2,820, and both the Cell processor and NVIDIA GPU have slimmed down from 90nm to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/30/40gb-ps3-features-65nm-chips-lower-power-consumption/">65nm</a>. They suspect Sony might be able to lower costs and turn a profit sometime in 2009, but while you may be rooting for this generation's underdog, don't get your hopes up for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/sony-makes-it-pretty-clear-no-ps3-price-drops-this-holiday-seas/">price drop</a> any time soon.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/">PS3 teardown: 30% fewer parts, $300 cheaper</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1410240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/ps3-teardown-30-less-parts-300-cheaper/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>isuppli</category><category>playstation 3</category><category>Playstation3</category><category>ps3</category><category>sony</category><category>tear down</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LCD shipments expected to skyrocket in Latin America]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=19808"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-17-08-toshibaxv454.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
With DirecTV <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/04/directv-goes-live-with-hd-offerings-in-latin-america/">launching HD service</a> in Latin America, we'd say it's about time its residents realized that flat-panels are the wave of the <strike>future</strike> present. According to a fresh iSuppli report, the Latin American television market is expected to make a hasty and noticeable transition between now and 2012. Reportedly, LCD TV shipments to the region are set to rise and account for over 83% of the market in under four years; meanwhile, shipments of bulky CRT sets will decline to make up around 8% of the total market. The numbers are pretty baffling when you consider that CRTs held 77.4% of the market just last year, and it's actually rather scary to think where all of those soon-to-be-unwanted sets <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/survey-shows-consumers-arent-apt-to-trash-analog-sets-post-cuto/">will end up</a>.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/crt/" rel="tag">CRT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/">LCD shipments expected to skyrocket in Latin America</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=19808>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1404205/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/lcd-shipments-expected-to-skyrocket-in-latin-america/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>	Latin America</category><category>	latinAmerica</category><category>2012</category><category>crt</category><category>data</category><category>flat-panel</category><category>global</category><category>growth</category><category>hd</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>lcd hdtv</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdHdtv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>research</category><category>rptv</category><category>shipments</category><category>study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli says T-Mobile G1 costs $144 to make, nothing to love]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200811111617DOWJONESDJONLINE000514_FORTUNE5.htm"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="16" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/11/g1-teardown-sm.jpg" /></a>Teardown specialist <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli</a> is at it again, digging through the <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/g1">G1's</a> guts this time around in an effort to wrap its inquisitive brain around the inaugural Android handset's bill of materials. The result? $144, which naturally doesn't reflect HTC's R&amp;D -- an additional expense that might have been unusually low for the G1 considering HTC's overwhelming expertise in manufacturing all things mobile. For the record, this is about $30 less than <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">iSuppli's July estimate for the 8GB iPhone 3G</a>, though the comparison isn't terribly fair considering that the G1 has a mere pittance of internal storage by comparison. There's no telling what T-Mobile pays HTC for each and every G1 it sells, but <em>we</em> pay $179 (<a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/10/28/t-mobile-g1-coming-to-walmart-for-148-88/">or less</a>) on contract -- so it seems HTC is making itself a nice little profit right out of the gate and customers aren't footing much of the bill. At least, not until they've gone a few months into their two-year agreements.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">iSuppli says T-Mobile G1 costs $144 to make, nothing to love</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200811111617DOWJONESDJONLINE000514_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1369957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>bom</category><category>g1</category><category>isuppli</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli says T-Mobile G1 costs $144 to make, nothing to love]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200811111617DOWJONESDJONLINE000514_FORTUNE5.htm"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="16" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/11/g1-teardown-sm.jpg" /></a>Teardown specialist <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli</a> is at it again, digging through the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/g1">G1's</a> guts this time around in an effort to wrap its inquisitive brain around the inaugural Android handset's bill of materials. The result? $144, which naturally doesn't reflect HTC's R&amp;D -- an additional expense that might have been unusually low for the G1 considering HTC's overwhelming expertise in manufacturing all things mobile. For the record, this is about $30 less than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">iSuppli's July estimate for the 8GB iPhone 3G</a>, though the comparison isn't terribly fair considering that the G1 has a mere pittance of internal storage by comparison. There's no telling what T-Mobile pays HTC for each and every G1 it sells, but <em>we</em> pay $179 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/28/t-mobile-g1-coming-to-walmart-for-148-88/">or less</a>) on contract -- so it seems HTC is making itself a nice little profit right out of the gate and customers aren't footing much of the bill. At least, not until they've gone a few months into their two-year agreements.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/htc/" rel="tag">HTC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/android/" rel="tag">Android</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/">iSuppli says T-Mobile G1 costs $144 to make, nothing to love</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200811111617DOWJONESDJONLINE000514_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1369944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/12/isuppli-says-t-mobile-g1-costs-144-to-make-nothing-to-love/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>bill of materials</category><category>BillOfMaterials</category><category>bom</category><category>g1</category><category>htc</category><category>isuppli</category><category>mobile</category><category>t-mobile</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global HDTV shipments exceed SDTVs for first time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=19663"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-23-08-hdtv-living-room.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
The times, they are a-changin'. Back in February, we found that LCD TV shipments had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/19/worldwide-lcd-tv-shipments-surpass-crts-for-first-time-ever/">surpassed CRTs</a> for the first time in history. Now, an iSuppli report on HDTV growth has shown that HDTVs overtook standard-definition televisions "as the leading TV shipped globally" in 2008. Sure, the current economic environment may put a damper on HDTV sales for the moment, but the previously mentioned research sees no sign of growth slowing in the long-term. In fact, it forecasts that HDTV unit shipments will surge to 241.2 million by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/2012/">2012</a>, up from 97.1 million units in 2007; in comparison, it reckons that just 23.1 million SDTVs will ship out in 2012. Oh, and if you're eager for even more smile-worthy news, the report also suggests that HD set-top-boxes will represent 50% of the overall STB market in under four years. Time will tell.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/TV_theater/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=211600041">InformationWeek</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://www.thepoolside.us/poolside/The_Harbortown/IMAG006.JPG">ThePoolSide</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/">Global HDTV shipments exceed SDTVs for first time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=19663>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1350724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/global-hdtv-shipments-exceed-sdtvs-for-first-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>analysis</category><category>analyst</category><category>data</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>industry</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>report</category><category>research</category><category>sales</category><category>sdtv</category><category>shipments</category><category>trends</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Over half of 2009 vehicles in America will offer iPod support]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9241&amp;m=10&amp;y=2008"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-14-08-ipod-adapter.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
And we're not talking about that 3.5mm-to-3.5mm trick, either. No sirree, we're referring to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/apple-ipod-integration-coming-to-ford-gm-mazda/">bona fide iPod integration</a>, and 2009 marks the first year where over half of all US-bound automobiles are expected to offer optional support for Apple's prolific PMP. When looking at 2008 model year vehicles, just 39% offered tight iPod integration, but according to Phil Magney, vice president of automotive research for iSuppli, the "automotive industry is at the point where in-vehicle technologies -- or the lack of them -- are influencing sales." Furthermore, Bluetooth is expected to be in 82% of 2009 US vehicles (optional or standard), and just so we're clear, we're talking <em>all</em> cars, not just the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/06/21/ipod-your-bmw-the-good-bad-and-ugly/">luxury brands</a>. Unfortunately, no data was provided for expected compatibility with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/16/dell-dj-ditty-now-available/">DJ Ditty</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/10/ipod-connection.html">Wired</a>, image courtesy of <a href="http://images.jpmagazine.com/news/154_0705_06_z+jeep_industry_news+jeep_ipod_jack.jpg">JPMagazine</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/">Over half of 2009 vehicles in America will offer iPod support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9241&amp;m=10&amp;y=2008>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1342446/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/over-half-of-2009-vehicles-in-america-will-offer-ipod-support/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>automobile</category><category>Bluetooth</category><category>cars</category><category>data</category><category>iPod</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>research</category><category>transportation</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung, Sony stay on top of the LCD sales battle]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/20071109-samsung_logo.jpg" />Samsung and Sony are celebrating (with their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/sony-samsung-both-claim-worlds-first-200hz-lcd-tv/">new displays</a> no doubt) a 1-2 finish in iSuppli's second quarter LCD TV sales report. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vizio/">Vizio's</a> slipped from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/">number one spot last year</a>, to behind Philips, Sharp and LG, respectively, accounting for only 6 percent of the market. According to iSuppli's analysts, major name brands moving aggressively into smaller sizes and budget retailers like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/attention-wal-mart-shoppers-new-sony-hdtvs-incoming/">Wal-mart</a> is squeezing the smaller Taiwanese competition out of the picture. Vizio bust onto the scene with extraordinary deals on flat screens, at this point does it become an also-ran as its principal supplier hooks up <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/02/lg-amtran-hook-up-on-lcd-joint-venture-to-go-live-in-2009/">with the big names</a>, or (we hope) is there at least one more hurrah coming Black Friday?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lg/" rel="tag">LG</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/philips/" rel="tag">Philips</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sharp/" rel="tag">Sharp</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/">Samsung, Sony stay on top of the LCD sales battle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTP27630820080910?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1309919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/samsung-sony-stay-on-top-of-the-lcd-sales-battle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amtran</category><category>analyst</category><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>lg</category><category>others</category><category>philips</category><category>sales</category><category>samsung</category><category>sharp</category><category>sony</category><category>vizio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli sez iPhone 3G is running Apple $53 less than original]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9072"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/07/isuppli-iphone-3g.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Tech firms seem to have this uncanny ability to significantly boost functionality while significantly reducing cost with each new generation of a product -- and you'll never believe this, but it looks like Apple is no exception. The teardown and bean-counting experts over at <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/search/?q=iSuppli">iSuppli</a> are at it again with the iPhone 3G, finding that the whole kit and kaboodle tallies up to just $174.33 (give or take) for the 8GB model in material and manufacturing costs. That works out to about $53 less than iSuppli's estimate for the original 8GB model back in June of last year, an amount saved in part by moving to a single 10-layer circuit board (versus a pair of 6-layer boards). The firm figures Apple's shelling out about $50 in royalties for each iPhone 3G that rolls off the assembly line, leading to a grand total of $224.33 in costs. Offset that with a healthy AT&amp;T subsidy, and all told, we're looking at something like a 55 percent margin to help Steve finance his next round of black turtlenecks.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/07/15/iphone_3gs_final_build_price_just_174_33.html">AppleInsider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">iSuppli sez iPhone 3G is running Apple $53 less than original</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9072>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1257310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g iphone</category><category>3gIphone</category><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>isuppli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli sez iPhone 3G is running Apple $53 less than original]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9072"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/isuppli-iphone-3g.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Tech firms seem to have this uncanny ability to significantly boost functionality while significantly reducing cost with each new generation of a product -- and you'll never believe this, but it looks like Apple is no exception. The teardown and bean-counting experts over at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iSuppli">iSuppli</a> are at it again with the iPhone 3G, finding that the whole kit and kaboodle tallies up to just $174.33 (give or take) for the 8GB model in material and manufacturing costs. That works out to about $53 less than iSuppli's estimate for the original 8GB model back in June of last year, an amount saved in part by moving to a single 10-layer circuit board (versus a pair of 6-layer boards). The firm figures Apple's shelling out about $50 in royalties for each iPhone 3G that rolls off the assembly line, leading to a grand total of $224.33 in costs. Offset that with a healthy AT&amp;T subsidy, and all told, we're looking at something like a 55 percent margin to help Steve finance his next round of black turtlenecks.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/07/15/iphone_3gs_final_build_price_just_174_33.html">AppleInsider</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/">iSuppli sez iPhone 3G is running Apple $53 less than original</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=9072>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1257288/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/isuppli-sez-iphone-3g-is-running-apple-53-less-than-original/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g iphone</category><category>3gIphone</category><category>apple</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>Iphone3g</category><category>isuppli</category><category>mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli looks at LCD dominance, emerging competition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20071203PR201.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/12-5-07-bistabledisplay.jpg" /></a>Not that it bears repeating, but LCDs have a pretty firm grip on the display market at large. Of course, that doesn't mean that other technologies will just sit idly on the sidelines, and research firm iSuppli managed to take a closer look at emerging <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/02/audioholics-looks-into-dlp-vs-3lcd/">competitors</a> to see just how viable some alternatives actually are. It should be noted that the report tends to focus on displays used in smaller wares, such as navigators, cellphones and heads-up displays, but the findings can certainly be applied to the HDTV industry at large. Throughout the writeup, bi-stable displays -- defined as "electronic displays that are capable of presenting an image without using power" -- are expected to see the biggest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/displaysearch-numbers-show-global-tv-sales-growth/">growth</a> in the coming years, while near-eye display revenue and the global HUD market will see slightly less impressive gains. Moreover, the pocket projector market is poised to explode, as it promises gigantic output from an incredibly diminutive footprint. Granted, it remains to be seen how long it'll take for a 1080p projector to fit in the palm of one's hand, but we can safely say we're already infatuated with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/13/projectiondesigns--action-m25-dlp-projector-does-1080p/">idea</a>.<br /><br />[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.polymervision.com/assets/downloadablefile/display4-12957.jpg">PolymerVision</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/projector/" rel="tag">Projector</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/">iSuppli looks at LCD dominance, emerging competition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20071203PR201.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1055665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/isuppli-looks-at-lcd-dominance-emerging-competition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bi-stable</category><category>business</category><category>competition</category><category>hd</category><category>hud</category><category>industry</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>market</category><category>market place</category><category>MarketPlace</category><category>near-eye</category><category>projection</category><category>projector</category><category>research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD slips out of iSuppli's top 10 semiconductor suppliers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=8675"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/amd_logo.jpg" /></a>iSuppli -- the market research firm that keeps us <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/">up to speed</a> on exactly how much each iPod <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/">pads</a> Steve's wallet (among <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/">other</a> things) -- has recently published its list of top players in the 2007 semiconductor market, and lo and behold, AMD isn't even in the top ten. It's noted that while Intel's chip revenue is expected to rise 7.7-percent in 2007, AMD's sales are predicted to sink some 22.7-percent for the year. Of course, AMD had only risen into the upper echelon of this list for the first time last year, but now it has fallen back to 11th, trailing the likes of Samsung, Toshiba, STMicroelectronics, Infineon, Sony, NXP, Intel and Texas Instruments. If you're interested in seeing the details behind the numbers, be sure and hit the read link below. Oh, and please do keep the fanboy comments respectable, will ya?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140077-pg,1/article.html">PCWorld</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/">AMD slips out of iSuppli's top 10 semiconductor suppliers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.isuppli.com/news/default.asp?id=8675>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1050692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/29/amd-slips-out-of-isupplis-top-10-semiconductor-suppliers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>business</category><category>chipmaker</category><category>industry</category><category>intel</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>ranking</category><category>rankings</category><category>Semiconductor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vizio still #1 for LCDs in North America]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/842825/"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/logo_vizio_med.gif"  alt="" /></a>Just when we were ready to give the North American LCD throne <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/02/vizio-slips-to-second-in-north-american-lcd-tv-sales/">back to Samsung and Sharp</a>, iSuppli has released its numbers, claiming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vizio/">Vizio</a> is still <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/21/vizio-dethrones-samsung-as-lcd-king-in-q2/">on top</a>. In contrast with the previous rankings from DisplaySearch, iSuppli saw Samsung improve its marketshare in the third quarter to 12.8 percent, but still unable to match Vizio's mark of 13 percent. Along with the new numbers is information that the other manufacturers have taken note of Vizio's success and increased their promotions, the tight competition should promise many choices and better prices as we get into the all-important holiday season.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34939/118/">TG Daily</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sharp/" rel="tag">Sharp</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/">Vizio still #1 for LCDs in North America</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/842825/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1046239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/22/vizio-still-1-for-lcds-in-north-america/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>market share</category><category>MarketShare</category><category>others</category><category>sales</category><category>samsung</category><category>sharp</category><category>vizio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung's still the #1 TV manufacturer]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/samsung-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/vizio">Vizio</a> may have snatched the sales crown when it comes to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/21/vizio-dethrones-samsung-as-lcd-king-in-q2/">LCDs in the U.S</a>., but Samsung maintained it's position as the largest worldwide TV manufacturer in the second quarter. Following Samsung's 12.4% market share were LG with 11.4% and Philips with 7.1%. The numbers were run by iSuppli, who forecast the quickening <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/23/requiem-for-the-impending-death-of-crt-televisions/">demise of the CRT</a>, with it dropping to 38% of unit shipments in 2009, compared to 56% this year. No word on exactly what part of that was HDTVs, but we hope buyers are getting the most quality possible out of those new plasmas and LCDs.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tvsnob.com/archives/013622.php">TV Snob</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/samsung/" rel="tag">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/crt/" rel="tag">CRT</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/plasma/" rel="tag">Plasma</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/">Samsung's still the #1 TV manufacturer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2582455620070925?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=technologyNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1000801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/samsungs-still-the-1-tv-manufacturer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crt</category><category>hd</category><category>isuppli</category><category>lcd</category><category>plasma</category><category>sales</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TI mounts new DLP push]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/dlp_sm.jpg"  alt="DLP logo" /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TI/">TI</a> has given its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/16/happy-20th-dlp/">20-year old</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DLP/">DLP</a> technology a shot in the arm in the form of a $100 million advertising and marketing campaign. The ads should be airing during HD broadcasts of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ESPN/">ESPN</a>'s Monday Night Football, as well as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ABC/">ABC</a> and ESPN's Nascar Nextel Cup offerings. And if you don't have a HDTV, TI will be moving a 60-seat DLP 3D cinema around the country during the Nascar season to start your HD addiction. This marketing effort is taking place even when <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iSuppli/">iSuppli</a> has estimated shipments of 1.5 million DLP sets in 2007, about flat from last year. It's a bold move for a technology facing increasing competition from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/plasma/">plasma</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LCD/">LCD</a>. We're hoping the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/06/ti-produces-darkchip-4-dlp-chipset/">DarkChip 4</a> devices deliver real-world results, or the slogan "It's all in the mirrors" could morph into "It's all smoke and mirrors."<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dlp/" rel="tag">DLP</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/">TI mounts new DLP push</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hdtv-central.net/blog/hdtv/hdtv-antennas/texas-instruments-ignites-major-push-for-dlp-hdtvs.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/994842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/ti-mounts-new-dlp-push/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>DLP</category><category>ESPN</category><category>hd</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>LCD</category><category>plasma</category><category>Ti</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iSuppli: new iPod nano costs Apple less than $83 in components]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070919PR207.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/ipod_nano_pimping_isuppli_header.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
The iPod nano is the "most popular music player in history" according to Steve Jobs. So there's nothing like an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/isuppli">iSuppli</a> teardown of the new, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/05/apple-announces-new-ipod-nano/">3rd gen device</a> to get the ol' analyst juices flowing. So get this: iSuppli claims that for every $149 4GB nano and $199 8GB nano sold, Apple's components costs are just $58.85 and $82.85, respectively. That's an 18.5% lower direct materials cost than the previous nano. In other words, a substantial increase in margins for what should be a tidy boost in Apple profit after covering R&amp;D costs. The teardown also indicates that Apple has once again opened the money trough to a whole new bevy of suppliers including Dialog Semiconductor, Intersil, and Synaptics. Micron is the big winner here as they supply the NAND flash storage whereas <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/15/ipod-touch-splayed-but-bluetooth-mystery-continues/">Toshiba provides it</a> for the iPod touch. Could be that the effects of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/17/samsung-to-deliver-only-85-of-promised-nand-flash-to-its-major/">Samsung's NAND factory power outage</a> are starting to show. Enjoy it while you can suppliers, chances are you'll be begging for Apple's business once the next round of product refreshes goes down. Bill of materials after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>iSuppli: new iPod nano costs Apple less than $83 in components</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portableaudio/" rel="tag">Portable Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/">iSuppli: new iPod nano costs Apple less than $83 in components</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20070919PR207.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/993092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/19/isuppli-new-ipod-nanos-cost-apple-just-59-and-83-in-component/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>isuppli</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portable video</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>teardown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[50-percent of your iPhone purchase to pad Apple's wallet?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/01-18-2007/0004508382&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/1-18-07-moneyiphone.jpg" /></a>Sure, LG's <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/18/lgs-ke850-prada-official-iphone-says-wha/">KE850 Prada handset</a> will set users back a cool $778, and the <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/18/the-google-switch-an-iphone-killer/">Google Switch</a> just might pop in to make things a bit more interesting, but a recent research report has unveiled that Apple's sure-to-be-sold-out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone">iPhone</a> is a lean, mean, profit-generating machine nonetheless. While Apple's well-known for selling its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipod">iPods</a> (and to a lesser extent, its Macs) for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/your-200-ipod-nano-costs-about-90-to-make/">much, much more</a> than it cost to manufacture, even we're a bit taken aback at how hard those corporate buyers must be workin' those suppliers on this one. According to iSuppli (no affiliation with Apple, of course), the 4GB iPhone will yield a "49.3 percent profit margin on each unit sold at the $499 retail price," while the 8GB rendition will kick back a 46.9-percent margin. You heard right, they're supposing the $499 mobile only costs Apple $245.83 to produce, while the 8GB flavor demands just $264.85. Of course, this isn't the first time a hot-selling product has been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wii-manufacturing-costs-ring-up-to-just-158/">broken down by the numbers</a> to prove just how ripped off we're all getting (if these numbers are to be trusted, that is) -- but hey, unless you've got the means to buy capacitors and LCD touchscreens by the boatload, you're probably stuck paying exactly what they ask. Plus if all this sudden competition gets a bit too heated, don't think <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple">Apple</a> doesn't have any room to introduce a (highly desired) price drop.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/">50-percent of your iPhone purchase to pad Apple's wallet?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/01-18-2007/0004508382&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/738335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/50-percent-of-your-iphone-purchase-to-pad-apples-wallet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>business</category><category>cingular</category><category>financial</category><category>industry</category><category>iphone</category><category>iSuppli</category><category>margin</category><category>money</category><category>profit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sony losing mad loot on each PS3]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.business2.com/utilitybelt/2006/11/sonys_loss_is_a.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/11/ps3-big.jpg" /></a>We all knew Sony was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/30/sonys-gonna-lose-100-on-each-playstation-3/">dropping</a> a fair <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/18/playstation-3-costs-900-sez-merrill-lynch-mob/">bit of cash</a> on each PS3 sold, but we suppose we got a bit too hung up on the resultant pricetags -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/11/sony-continues-to-play-defense-over-ps3-pricing-hdmi/">notorious $499 and $599 SKUs</a> -- to give the actual losses much of a thought. Well, worry not Sony, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iSuppli">iSuppli</a>'s got your back. Turns out Sony will be losing change to the tune of $241.35 for every "premium" (WiFi and 60GB HDD) console, and a whoppin' $306.85 for the bargain-basement 20 gigger. In comparison, Microsoft loses $75.70 per 360 it sells, while Nintendo is laughing all the way to the bank with a profit per Wii sold. Just in case you missed it the first time around, or fell off your chair and forgot what you were reading about: Sony will <em>lose</em> the equivalent (or more) to the retail price of a competing console every time a cash register rings up a PS3 sale this holiday. We suppose it's for the best, then, that Sony <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/07/sony-admits-to-overreaching-on-playstation3s-blu-ray-producti/">won't have a whole lot of 'em</a> to hand out, since we're sure Sony's own costs will start to drop as production really ramps up next year. Be sure to peep the read link for a full breakdown of the costs.<br /><br /><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Our bad, Microsoft actually <em>makes</em> $75.70 per 360 sold, as opposed to the <a href="http://household.engadget.com/2005/11/24/so-whats-microsoft-really-losing-on-the-xbox-360/1">$71 they were losing</a> last year at launch.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/">Sony losing mad loot on each PS3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.business2.com/utilitybelt/2006/11/sonys_loss_is_a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/703347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/16/sony-losing-mad-loot-on-each-ps3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>isuppli</category><category>loss</category><category>ps3</category><category>sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:52:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
