<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Broadcom introduces low-power WiFi and Bluetooth chips for the Internet of things]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/30/broadcom-introduces-low-power-wifi-and-bluetooth-chips/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/30/broadcom-introduces-low-power-wifi-and-bluetooth-chips/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/30/broadcom-introduces-low-power-wifi-and-bluetooth-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/30/broadcom-introduces-low-power-wifi-and-bluetooth-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Broadcom introduces low-power WiFi and Bluetooth chips for the Internet of things" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/broadcom-lead.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Internetofthings/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Internet of things</a> -- that nebulous term usually associated with interconnecting everyday objects in a meaningful way -- is in the news again. Yesterday, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Broadcom/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Broadcom</a> announced that it's launching a couple cost-effective, power-efficient wireless chips geared towards appliances, home automation and wearable devices. The first SoC, BCM4390, incorporates a highly-efficient WiFi radio for embedded use in products such as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/scale/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">weight scales</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/02/nest-learning-thermostat-gets-refreshed-with-a-slimmer-design-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">thermostats</a> and security cameras. It fits into the company's range of Wireless Internet Connectivity for Embedded Devices (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/11/broadcoms-got-a-wiced-game-it-plays-to-make-smart-devices-feel/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">WICED</a>) chips. The second SoC, BCM20732, features an ultra low-power Bluetooth transceiver and targets devices like heart rate monitors, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pedometer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">pedometers</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/22/kwikset-and-unikeys-kevo-keyless-entry-system-hands-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">door locks</a>. Broadcom's also contributing its Bluetooth software stack to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AndroidOpenSourceProject/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Android Open Source Project</a> with support for both standard and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BluetoothSmart/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bluetooth Smart</a> hardware. Does this mean our long-awaited smart toaster's just around the corner? We sure hope so. Follow the source links below for more info.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/30/broadcom-introduces-low-power-wifi-and-bluetooth-chips/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s767775" target="_blank">Broadcom (1)</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s767776" target="_blank">(2)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>Android Open Source Project</category><category>AndroidOpenSourceProject</category><category>AOSP</category><category>Bluetooth</category><category>Bluetooth Smart</category><category>BluetoothSmart</category><category>Broadcom</category><category>contest</category><category>embedded</category><category>Internet of things</category><category>InternetOfThings</category><category>low cost</category><category>low power</category><category>LowCost</category><category>LowPower</category><category>WICED</category><category>WiFi</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriam Joire]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 09:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20588619</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Acer unveils space-saving ME mini tower and XC desktops for (low) power users]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/acer-me-xc/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/acer-me-xc/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/acer-me-xc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/acer-me-xc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Acer refreshes" data-src-height="450" data-src-width="558" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/acer-aspire-me-series-with-keyboard-etc.jpg" /></a></p><p> The arrival of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/12/windows-8-packaging-and-pricing-revealed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows 8</a> is a good excuse for the PC industry to flood the market with so much hardware, consumers will be blinded by so much choice. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/15/acer-aspire-5600u-7600u-touchscreen-all-in-ones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Acer's</a> jabbing its digits into your eyes with its new lineup of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/acer-says-its-moving-away-from-the-lower-end-in-europe-leavi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">low-end desktops</a> for the casual user. The ME micro towers will take an Intel Core i5 or I7, 2TB HDDs and up to 16GB of RAM. If you don't have anywhere else to stash your smartphone, the chassis comes with a recess desk on top with a USB port for easy charging. Those looking for something a little less demanding can pick up an XC desktop, a space-saving unit that will take an Intel Core i3, a 1TB HDD and up to 6GB of RAM. Prices for the ME begin at $700, while the cheaper XCs will set you back a much more modest $400.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/acer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Acer</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/18/acer-me-xc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>acer</category><category>Acer ME</category><category>Acer XC</category><category>Acer XC Desktop</category><category>AcerMe</category><category>AcerXc</category><category>AcerXcDesktop</category><category>Core i3</category><category>Core i5</category><category>Core i7</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>Intel</category><category>Ivy Bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>Low Power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>ME Micro-Tower</category><category>MeMicro-tower</category><category>Micro Tower</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MicroTower</category><category>PC</category><category>PCs</category><category>Small</category><category>Windows</category><category>Windows 8</category><category>Windows8</category><category>XC Desktop</category><category>XcDesktop</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20348381</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook to backup its servers with low-power storage devices at 'Sub-Zero' data center]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Facebook to backup its servers with low-power storage devices at 'Sub-Zero' data center" data-src-height="400" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/facebook-prineville-datacenter.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Data backups come in all shapes and sizes. For some, they take the form of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/12/seagate-backup-plus-portable-hard-drive-one-click-backup-with-a/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">external hard drives</a> or a slice of the amorphous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/14/ask-engadget-best-heavy-duty-cloud-storage-solution/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">cloud</a>. As for Facebook, its upcoming solution is low-power deep-storage hardware contained within a 62,000 square-foot building in Prineville, Oregon near its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/facebooks-open-compute-project-shares-plans-for-energy-efficien/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">existing</a> Beaver State data center. Unofficially referred to as "Sub-Zero," the facility will store a copy of the social network's data in case its primary servers need to be restored in an emergency. Rather than continuously power HDDs that are only occasionally used, the new setup can conserve energy by lighting-up drives just when they're needed. One of the company's existing server racks eats up around 4.5 kilowatts, while those at Sub-Zero are each expected to consume approximately 1.5 kilowatts once they're up and running. Tom Furlong, Facebook's vice president of site operations, told <em>Wired</em> that there are hopes to create a similar structure alongside the firm's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/21/facebook-flips-the-swtich-on-its-north-carolina-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">North Carolina data center</a>. Since the Prineville project is still being planned, Zuckerberg &amp; Co. have roughly six to nine months to suss out all the details before your photos are backed up at the new digs.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/18/facebook-backup-servers-sub-zero-low-power-data-center/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>back-up</category><category>back-ups</category><category>backup</category><category>backups</category><category>data center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>emergency backup</category><category>EmergencyBackup</category><category>energy</category><category>energy efficiency</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficiency</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>Facebook</category><category>hdd</category><category>hdds</category><category>low power</category><category>low-power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>oregon</category><category>Prineville</category><category>Prineville Oregon</category><category>PrinevilleOregon</category><category>server</category><category>server rack</category><category>server racks</category><category>ServerRack</category><category>ServerRacks</category><category>servers</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>SocialNetworks</category><category>storage</category><category>Sub Zero</category><category>sub-zero</category><category>SubZero</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis Santos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20303887</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget: Best sub-$310 power-efficient HTPC for a caravan?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/07/ask-engadget-best-sub-310-power-efficient-htpc-for-a-caravan/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/07/ask-engadget-best-sub-310-power-efficient-htpc-for-a-caravan/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/07/ask-engadget-best-sub-310-power-efficient-htpc-for-a-caravan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/07/ask-engadget-best-sub-310-power-efficient-htpc-for-a-caravan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ask Engadget: Best sub-$310 power-efficient HTPC for a caravan?" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/askengadgetlogo09.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 432px; height: 196px;" /></a></p><p> We know you've got questions, and if you're brave enough to ask the world for answers, here's the outlet to do so. This week's <a href="http://ask.engadget.com/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ask Engadget</a> inquiry is coming to us from Is from Martin, who is looking for a hyper-efficient media streamer for his retro caravan. If you're looking to send in an inquiry of your own, drop us a line at <strong><em>ask [at] engadget [dawt] com</em></strong>.</p><blockquote> <p>  "My partner and I are renovating a small '70s caravan and would like a power-efficient media center/PC purely to watch our library of movies and TV shows. We're in Australia, so getting hold of kit like the Raspberry Pi would be difficult, we're looking for something that's equally power efficient, even up to $300 AUD (around $310 USD). Cheers!""</p></blockquote><p> That's this week's challenge, <em>Engadgeteers</em> -- do you feel up for it? Can you help our southern hemisphere friends find a power-efficient HTPC for under $310 that won't drain a retro-caravan's batteries? Can we help these people turn the temporary home into a rockin' media-streamin' paradise? Hit us up in the comments if you've got some expertise to share.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/07/ask-engadget-best-sub-310-power-efficient-htpc-for-a-caravan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AE</category><category>Ask</category><category>Ask Engadget</category><category>AskEngadget</category><category>Australia</category><category>Home Theater PC</category><category>HomeTheaterPc</category><category>HTPC</category><category>Low Power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>Media Center</category><category>Media Center PC</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>MediaCenterPc</category><category>Power</category><category>Power-Efficient</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20271954</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung mass-produces 4-gigabit LPDDR2 memory, aims to make 2GB a common sight in smartphones]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/samsung-mass-produces-4-gigabit-lpddr2-memory/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/samsung-mass-produces-4-gigabit-lpddr2-memory/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/samsung-mass-produces-4-gigabit-lpddr2-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/samsung-mass-produces-4-gigabit-lpddr2-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/samsung-20nm-lpddr2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> Samsung started making <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">2GB low-power mobile memory</a> last year, but as the 1GB-equipped phone you likely have in your hand shows, the chips weren't built on a wide-enough scale to get much use. The Korean company is hoping to fix that now that it's mass-producing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/20nm?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">20-nanometer</a>, 4-gigabit LPDDR2 RAM. Going to a smaller process than the 30-nanometer chips of old will not just slim the memory down by a fifth, helping your smartphone stay skinny: it should help 2GB of RAM become the "mainstream product" by the end of 2013, if Samsung gets its way. New chips should run at 1,066Mbps without chewing up any more power than the earlier parts, too, so there's no penalty for using the denser parts. It's hard to say whether or not the 20nm design is what's leading to the 2GB of RAM in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/16/ntt-docomos-galaxy-s-iii-to-ship-with-2gb-ram/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Japanese Galaxy S III</a>; we just know that the upgraded NTT DoCoMo phone is now just the start of a rapidly approaching trend for smartphones and tablets.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/samsung-mass-produces-4-gigabit-lpddr2-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>20 nanometer</category><category>20-nanometer</category><category>20Nanometer</category><category>20nm</category><category>20nm-class</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>low power</category><category>low power ddr2</category><category>low-power</category><category>low-power ddr2</category><category>Low-powerDdr2</category><category>LowPower</category><category>LowPowerDdr2</category><category>LPDDR2</category><category>memory</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>ntt docomo</category><category>NttDocomo</category><category>ram</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s 3</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>SamsungGalaxyS3</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>tablet pcs</category><category>TabletPc</category><category>TabletPcs</category><category>tablets</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20239993</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Panasonic preps samples of next-gen ReRAM devices, NAND preps for early retirement]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/panasonic-low-power-reram/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/panasonic-low-power-reram/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/panasonic-low-power-reram/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/panasonic-low-power-reram/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/jn120515-1-1-1337085656.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 588px; height: 329px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> The Galaxy S III may rock an impressive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-tested/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">battery life</a>, but if Panasonic has its way, even greater benchmarks could be on the horizon. The company is ready to start making samples of a new ReRAM microcontroller, and -- like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Sharp and Elpida</a> -- it could start mass production as soon as next year. Here's a little refresher: ReRAM is a new kind of memory with re-write speeds far superior to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nand/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NAND</a> because it doesn't need power to hold onto information. Panny's chip will initially be used in simple devices like fire alarms, but the tech could eventually find its way into our TVs and even smartphones and tablets. But seriously, are we even capable of living in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/02/toshiba-sings-nand-flashs-praises/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NAND-free</a> world?</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/panasonic-low-power-reram/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cell phone</category><category>cell phones</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>japan</category><category>japanese</category><category>low power</category><category>low-power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>memory</category><category>microcontroller</category><category>microcontrollers</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobile tech</category><category>mobile technology</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MobileTech</category><category>MobileTechnology</category><category>non-volatile memory</category><category>Non-volatileMemory</category><category>nonvolatile memory</category><category>NonvolatileMemory</category><category>panasonic</category><category>ram</category><category>reram</category><category>slates</category><category>soc</category><category>storage</category><category>tablets</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Verrecchio]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20238178</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Series revisits ARM's humble beginnings, BBC Micro and all]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/series-revisits-arms-humble-beginnings/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/series-revisits-arms-humble-beginnings/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/series-revisits-arms-humble-beginnings/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/series-revisits-arms-humble-beginnings/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Series revisits ARM's humble beginnings, BBC Micro and all" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/unsung5.jpg" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 400px; height: 392px; " /></a></p><p> If you read our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/the-engadget-interview-arm-co-founder-john-biggs/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">interview</a> with ARM co-founder John Biggs, you know the company behind the processor in most smartphones had quite modest beginnings, what with an office in a barn and all. But Biggs is only part of the story, and <em>Reghardware</em> fleshes the rest out with a two-part series on the "unsung heroes of tech": Sophie Wilson, Steve Furber and Herman Hauser, the team behind Acorn Computers, the British PC company that spawned ARM in the mid-80s. We'll let you click through to the source links to take the journey yourself, but here are a few highlights: earning a computer contract with the BBC, happening upon ARM chips' low power consumption by accident and striking gold thanks to a partnership with Apple.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/series-revisits-arms-humble-beginnings/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ARM</category><category>arm holdings</category><category>ARM processor</category><category>ArmHoldings</category><category>ArmProcessor</category><category>backstories</category><category>backstory</category><category>chip</category><category>chips</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>series</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Silbert]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 10:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20230835</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel adds to ULV processor line with 1.8GHz Core i7 and i5 options, one of them to star in ASUS UX21]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/11x06210734fge.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Intel's so-called <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ultrabooks</a> may be a little way off into the distance at the moment, but the company isn't making you wait until its Ivy Bridge rollout to get a taste for ultraslim laptops with some real power inside them. A trio of new ultra-low voltage CPUs, each rated with a TDP of just 17W, has been added to the company's catalog, starting with the top-tier Core i7-2677M, whose pair of cores run at 1.8GHz by default but can be sped up to 2.9GHz when duty calls. Then there's the i7-2637M, which looks to only differ in clock speeds (1.7GHz default, 2.8GHz under Turbo Boost), and the i5-2557M that makes do with a 3MB L3 cache (1MB less than its i7 brethren) and a 1.7GHz / 2.7GHz speed range. All three 64-bit, 32nm processors also integrate a GPU (350MHz base clock, maxes out at 1.2GHz) within their walls, which is what makes their ascetic power consumption all the more impressive. OEMs should soon start splicing these new options into their next generation laptops, and while the obvious speculation centers around a MacBook Air refresh, <em>CNET</em> tells us the Core i5-2557M has already found a home in ASUS' upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">UX21</a>, a (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">purportedly</a>) sub-$1,000 11.6-inch featherweight contender.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/21/intel-adds-to-ulv-processor-line-with-1-8ghz-core-i7-and-i5-opti/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>17w</category><category>32nm</category><category>core 2011</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i5-2557m</category><category>core i7</category><category>core i7-2637m</category><category>Core i7-2677M</category><category>Core2011</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI5-2557m</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>CoreI7-2637m</category><category>CoreI7-2677m</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>efficient</category><category>intel</category><category>low power</category><category>low voltage</category><category>LowPower</category><category>LowVoltage</category><category>processor</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>shipping</category><category>ulv</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19972189</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Battery-less transmitters pave the way for wireless baby sensors]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/15/battery-less-transimitters-pave-the-way-for-wireless-baby-sensor/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/15/battery-less-transimitters-pave-the-way-for-wireless-baby-sensor/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/15/battery-less-transimitters-pave-the-way-for-wireless-baby-sensor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<img alt="NFC Baby" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/6-15-2011nfcbaby.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" />The radio waves that saturate the air around us may, or may not, give us <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/swedes-hit-hard-by-wimax-waves/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">headaches</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/31/cellphones-are-dangerous-not-dangerous-the-who-changes-its-mind/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">cancer</a>, but we can tell you for certain they're capable of powering tiny wireless chips. Renesas Electronics Corp has created a new ultra-low power wireless transmitter that can push data to both Bluetooth and WiFi receivers without the need for a battery or AC adapter. Instead of the typical tens of milliwatts, the little transmitters require only a few microwatts of power, which can be harvested from environmental radio waves through LC resonance. The creators envision adhesive sensors that send a baby's body temperature to laptops and ads that beam coupons to smartphones over short distances -- you know, the sort of stuff NFC can do, but without the specialized hardware.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/15/battery-less-transimitters-pave-the-way-for-wireless-baby-sensor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bluetooth</category><category>electricity</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>NFC</category><category>power</category><category>radio</category><category>radio waves</category><category>RadioWaves</category><category>Renesas</category><category>Renesas Electronics Corp</category><category>RenesasElectronicsCorp</category><category>transmitter</category><category>ultra-low power</category><category>Ultra-lowPower</category><category>wifi</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19967680</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Panasonic shrinks WiGig for cellphones, sets our hearts a flutter]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/panasonic-shrinks-wigig-for-cellphones-sets-our-hearts-a-flutte/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/panasonic-shrinks-wigig-for-cellphones-sets-our-hearts-a-flutte/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/panasonic-shrinks-wigig-for-cellphones-sets-our-hearts-a-flutte/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/01/qualcomm-unleashes-tri-band-wifi-and-new-mobile-wireless-chipset/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Panasonic Shrinks WiGig" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/6-3-2011shrinkwigig.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/01/qualcomm-unleashes-tri-band-wifi-and-new-mobile-wireless-chipset/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Tri-band WiGig</a> in a laptop? Yawnsville. Now, put that 60GHz connection in a high-end smartphone and we're all ears (and sweaty palms). Panasonic is the first out the gate with a 802.11ad compatible chip for mobile devices and, despite its head-spinning multi-gigabit speeds, the company's creation draws less that 1W of power. It'll be sometime before <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wigig?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">WiGig</a> makes its way into your Droid or iPhone, but when it does you can look forward to wirelessly syncing entire seasons of <em>Good Eats</em> (in 1080p, of course) to your phone in mere minutes. Until then, you'll just have to make do with the tantalizing PR after the break.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/panasonic-shrinks-wigig-for-cellphones-sets-our-hearts-a-flutte/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>60GHz</category><category>802.11ad</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>mobile</category><category>networking</category><category>panasonic</category><category>wigig</category><category>wigig alliance</category><category>WigigAlliance</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19957718</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung entices with electrowetting displays at SID 2011: coming to consumers later this year?]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/samsung-entices-with-elecrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011-coming/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/samsung-entices-with-elecrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011-coming/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/samsung-entices-with-elecrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011-coming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/samsung-entices-with-elecrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011-coming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-2011.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/liquavista?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Liquavista</a> has teased us with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/philips-spins-off-liquavista-to-develop-thin-electrowetting-disp/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">potential of its electrowetting displays</a> for years, but we hadn't gotten to peep its panels <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">post-acquisition</a> until now, at SID 2011. In addition to the several screens we'd seen before, there was a new monochrome model that operates at low frequencies (down to sub-hertz levels) to cut down on current consumption. We also laid eyes on its chromatic displays, but in comparison to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/mirasol-showcases-4-1-inch-smartphone-concept-at-sid-2011-promi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mirasol's tech</a>, electrowetting has a ways to go to match the image quality of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/21/qualcomm-announces-first-imod-based-mirasol-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">IMOD</a>. However, Sammy said that its reflective screens can be constructed with minimal mods to existing LCD manufacturing plants, while making Mirasol requires fresh fab facilities. Such a factory <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/02/qualcomm-lays-down-1-billion-for-new-mirasol-plant-in-taiwan-c/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">isn't exactly cheap</a>, and Mirasol's large-scale production plant won't be around until 2012. So Samsung might snatch the market if it gets there first, and the rep we spoke with said the company hopes to have products shipping this year. While we wait for their hopes and dreams to come to fruition, view the vid after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Samsung's color and low frequency electrowetting displays at SID 2011</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/4142806?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-20111635_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/4142805?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-20111657_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/4142804?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-20111658_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/4142803?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-20111659_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsungs-color-and-low-frequency-electrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011/4142802?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/samsung-liquavista-electrowetting-display-sid-20111660_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/samsung-entices-with-elecrowetting-displays-at-sid-2011-coming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>display</category><category>electrowetting</category><category>hands-on</category><category>liquavista</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>panel</category><category>reflective</category><category>reflective display</category><category>ReflectiveDisplay</category><category>samsung</category><category>screen</category><category>sid</category><category>sid 2011</category><category>Sid2011</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19944126</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung starts baking 30nm 4Gb LPDDR2 chips, packaging 2GB mobile RAM in April]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/samsung-lpddr2-03252011.jpg" /></a></div>
When it comes to mobile RAM, capacity is often what pops to mind first while we overlook speed and power consumption, but Samsung's latest delivery is worth the extra attention. Earlier this month, said Korean giant started producing 30nm 4Gb 1066Mbps <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LPDDR2?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">LPDDR2</a> (or simply Mobile DDR2) chips, in order to phase out its 40nm ones that topped 2Gb at a 800Mbps transmission rate. To put it in perspective, a 40nm 1GB package consists of four 2Gb chips, whereas the new 30nm one will only need two 4Gb chips, thus reducing the package thickness by 20 percent (down to 0.8mm) and power consumption by 25 percent. It's hard to tell when we'll start seeing these bits of silicon entering the consumer market, but Samsung's already stamping out 1GB modules this month, with a 2GB version to follow next month. Oh yes, we're definitely liking the sound of 2GB RAM for mobile phones.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/25/samsung-starts-baking-30nm-4gb-lpddr2-chips-packaging-2gb-mobil/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>30nm</category><category>4Gb</category><category>dram</category><category>fabrication</category><category>low power</category><category>low power ddr2</category><category>LowPower</category><category>LowPowerDdr2</category><category>lpddr2</category><category>memory</category><category>memory fabrication</category><category>MemoryFabrication</category><category>mobile ddr2</category><category>mobile ram</category><category>MobileDdr2</category><category>MobileRam</category><category>ram</category><category>ram fabrication</category><category>ram production</category><category>RamFabrication</category><category>RamProduction</category><category>samsung</category><category>silicon</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19891505</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[VIA says Eden X2 is world's most power-efficient dual-core processor]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/via-edenx2-dualcore.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Following close behind the low-power <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Nano X2</a> comes the Eden X2, or what VIA is calling "the world's most power-efficient" fanless dual-core processor. While we've yet to see any official numbers, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the original Eden</a> did 500MHz on one watt of power, so we should see similarly thrifty specs here. Aside from that, the unit houses two 64-bit cores in a 21 x 21 millimeter package, is compatible with Windows CE and Linux operating systems, and was built using a 40-nanometer manufacturing process. The Eden X2 made its debut at the World Embedded conference this week, and should make it to the real world by the end of Q2. Full PR after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/via-says-eden-x2-is-worlds-most-power-efficient-dual-core-proce/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual core processor</category><category>dual-core</category><category>dual-core processor</category><category>Dual-coreProcessor</category><category>DualCore</category><category>DualCoreProcessor</category><category>eden</category><category>eden x2</category><category>EdenX2</category><category>embedded</category><category>embedded systems</category><category>EmbeddedSystems</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>fanless</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>power efficient</category><category>PowerEfficient</category><category>processor</category><category>Via</category><category>via eden</category><category>via eden x2</category><category>via processor</category><category>via technologies</category><category>ViaEden</category><category>ViaEdenX2</category><category>ViaProcessor</category><category>ViaTechnologies</category><category>x2</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Trout]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19867088</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD has a 5W Fusion APU to put in your future tablet of choice]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/amd-has-a-5w-fusion-apu-to-put-in-your-future-tablet-of-choice/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/amd-has-a-5w-fusion-apu-to-put-in-your-future-tablet-of-choice/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/amd-has-a-5w-fusion-apu-to-put-in-your-future-tablet-of-choice/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/amd-has-a-5w-fusion-apu-to-put-in-your-future-tablet-of-choice/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01318bamd.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The same Singapore event that brought us our first look at AMD's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/amd-radeon-hd-6990-shows-up-in-its-metallic-flesh-looking-large/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">humongous Radeon HD 6990</a> has also served as the stage for the company's first showing of a new, even lower-powered Fusion APU. The regular dual-core Ontario (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/c-50?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">C-50</a>) variant requires a 9W power budget to operate, but AMD's managed to shrink that down to 5W in a chip designed specifically to be used in tablets. Clock speed remains at 1GHz and the core count hasn't bee touched, but the memory controller has been dumbed down and peripheral ports have been reduced to one of each type. This streamlined C-50 has already found a home in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/25/acers-10-1-inch-tablet-reportedly-uses-amd-c-50-apu-tegra-2-ba/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Acer's 10.1-inch Windows 7 tablet</a> and should prove decently popular among manufacturers looking for an x86 alternative to the coming tidal wave of ARM-based devices.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/amd-has-a-5w-fusion-apu-to-put-in-your-future-tablet-of-choice/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>5w</category><category>amd</category><category>amd c-50</category><category>amd fusion</category><category>AmdC-50</category><category>AmdFusion</category><category>apu</category><category>bobcat</category><category>c-50</category><category>cpu</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion apu</category><category>FusionApu</category><category>graphics</category><category>hardware</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>official</category><category>ontario</category><category>processor</category><category>singapore</category><category>slate</category><category>slates</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19821572</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung buys Liquavista, dives headfirst into electrowetting displays]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Liquavista displays get flexible, 'unbreakable,' still rather theoretical (video)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/liquavista-2010-10-28-600.jpg" /></a></div>
Samsung's got a reputation for building <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/samsung-showcases-4-5-inch-flexible-amoled-may-actually-mass-pr/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">crazy</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/09/samsung-shows-flexible-and-transparent-displays-at-ces-2011-vid/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">awesome</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/01/samsung-touts-super-pls-display-as-the-evolution-of-ips-on-smart/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">display</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/samsung-wave-ii-has-its-super-clear-lcd-tested-against-galaxy-s/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">technologies</a>, and it just added another one to the stack -- with the buyout of Philips-spinoff <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Liquavista/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Liquavista</a> this December, it's gained quite the foothold in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/electrowetting/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">electrowetting</a>. In case you're not familiar, electrowetting has been repeatedly pitched to us as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/28/liquavista-displays-get-flexible-unbreakable-still-rather-th/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">pretty much the Holy Grail of displays</a>: flexible, colorful, unbreakable, outdoor-readable e-paper screens with high refresh rates and low-power consumption that can be manufactured on existing assembly lines. We'll have to see if the theories equate to meaningful products, but we imagine ownership by Samsung can't hurt one bit, especially as the company says it will "expand its leadership in next generation display technologies by pioneering the application of electrowetting in e-Paper and transparent displays." Sounds like a commitment to us. PR after the break.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>Seems that <em>The Digital Reader</em> actually figured out about the deal yesterday -- read the original scoop at our more coverage link!

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/samsung-buys-liquavista-preps-some-snappy-low-power-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Display</category><category>displays</category><category>electrowetting</category><category>flexible</category><category>flexible display</category><category>FlexibleDisplay</category><category>liquavista</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>Samsung</category><category>screen</category><category>screens</category><category>transparent</category><category>transparent display</category><category>TransparentDisplay</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19807790</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[VIA Nano X2 low power, dual-core chip gets official]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/5306143676362963f056.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
VIA has officially announced its Nano X2 low power dual-core chip. The chip comprises two of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VIA/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">VIA</a>'s 64-bit <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Isaiah?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Isaiah</a> architecture cores, found in previous single-core Nano CPUs. The processors come with native 64-bit software support, VIA's PadLock hardware security features, and VT CPU virtualization technology. The new Nano X2 chips are compatible with VIA's previous processors, including the Nano, C7, C7-M, and Eden, facilitating easy upgrades. The VIA Nano X2 processors are already currently available for OEMs, with systems featuring the chips expected in the first quarter of this year. Full press release is after the break

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/04/via-nano-x2-low-power-dual-core-chip-gets-official/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ces</category><category>ces 2011</category><category>ces2011</category><category>chip</category><category>chips</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual-core</category><category>isaiah</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>nano</category><category>nano x2</category><category>NanoX2</category><category>via</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19786743</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Elpida and Sharp team up for ReRAM in 2013: 10,000x the speed of current NAND flash chips]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/10x1013ibrsdavvdwdcws.jpg" /></a></div>
Want to know where the next breakthrough in mobile technology will come from? Well, if <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/24/elpida-and-spansion-move-from-its-complicated-to-engaged-l/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Elpida</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sharp?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Sharp</a> have their way, the answer will be the usual suspect of Japan, where they're working away on new memory chips said to be capable of four orders of magnitude faster performance than the ordinary NAND flash storage of today. Dubbed ReRAM, or Resistive Random Access Memory, this project targets a 2013 date for commercialization and counts the University of Tokyo and Japan's National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology among its development team. Details on how such blinding speeds will be reached aren't readily available, but the <em>Nikkei</em> reports power consumption will be down to "virtually zero" when the memory's not in use. So with ReRAM and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/hp-labs-teams-up-with-hynix-to-manufacture-memristors-plans-as/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HP's memristors</a> both set for three years from now, can we schedule NAND's funeral for 2014 or what?

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/elpida-and-sharp-team-up-for-reram-in-2013-10-000x-the-speed-of/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>commercialization</category><category>development</category><category>elpida</category><category>future</category><category>japan</category><category>low power</category><category>low-power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>memory</category><category>naist</category><category>National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology</category><category>NationalInstituteOfAdvancedIndustrialScienceAndTechnology</category><category>partnership</category><category>plans</category><category>ram</category><category>reram</category><category>research</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sharp</category><category>storage</category><category>university</category><category>university of tokyo</category><category>UniversityOfTokyo</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19671796</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pixel Qi turns into ideal 10-inch companion display with wired and Wireless USB, 1.5W power needs]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/28/pixel-qi-turns-into-ideal-10-inch-companion-display-with-both-wi/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/28/pixel-qi-turns-into-ideal-10-inch-companion-display-with-both-wi/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/28/pixel-qi-turns-into-ideal-10-inch-companion-display-with-both-wi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/28/pixel-qi-turns-into-ideal-10-inch-companion-display-with-both-wi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/10x0928ukb234pixqi.jpg" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/pixelqi?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"> Pixel Qi</a> has today announced it's taking the next step in its quest for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/pixel-qi-dual-mode-displays-sell-out-in-a-good-way/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">global domination</a> of sunlight-readable displays. Partnering up with German outfit Display Solution AG, the company is about to start selling its 10-inch, 1024 x 600 panels as standalone units, which you'll be able to hook up to your computer or smartphone via USB, either the wired or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/wirelessusb?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Wireless</a> version. Power consumption maxes out a measly 1.5W with the LED backlight turned on, meaning that one USB tether will be sufficient to feed it <em>both</em> power and data. We don't know exactly how long we've waited for a secondary screen with this sort of flexibility, but it's sure been a while. Look for Display Solution to start selling these hotcakes next month.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/28/pixel-qi-turns-into-ideal-10-inch-companion-display-with-both-wi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>d-screen</category><category>d-screen-qi10</category><category>display</category><category>display solution</category><category>DisplaySolution</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>monitor</category><category>portable</category><category>portable display</category><category>PortableDisplay</category><category>power efficiency</category><category>PowerEfficiency</category><category>qi10</category><category>screen</category><category>second screen</category><category>SecondScreen</category><category>sunlight</category><category>sunlight-readable</category><category>usb</category><category>usb display</category><category>UsbDisplay</category><category>video</category><category>wireless usb</category><category>WirelessUsb</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19651155</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Qualcomm's Peanut challenges ZigBee, Bluetooth for control of your personal area network next year]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/qualcomms-peanut-challenges-zigbee-bluetooth-for-control-of-yo/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/qualcomms-peanut-challenges-zigbee-bluetooth-for-control-of-yo/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/qualcomms-peanut-challenges-zigbee-bluetooth-for-control-of-yo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/qualcomms-peanut-challenges-zigbee-bluetooth-for-control-of-yo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/9-23-10-qualcommpeanut600.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Perhaps dissatisfied with the glacial pace of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Wibree/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Wibree</a>, Qualcomm's working on an ultra-low-power, short-range wireless transfer tech of its own -- it's called Peanut, and executives claim it only needs "fractions of a milliwatt of power" to push data at several megabits per second. <em>Computerworld</em> got the scoop on the new low-power radio at EmTech@MIT 2010, and reports that Qualcomm's had these goobers in the oven since 2006 and is looking to trump the likes of ZigBee and Bluetooth by this time next year. Assuming, of course, the Peanut standard doesn't require a molasses-like committee of its own to attain formal approval.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/qualcomms-peanut-challenges-zigbee-bluetooth-for-control-of-yo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>body area network</category><category>BodyAreaNetwork</category><category>low energy</category><category>Low power</category><category>LowEnergy</category><category>LowPower</category><category>pan</category><category>Peanut</category><category>personal area network</category><category>PersonalAreaNetwork</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Qualcomm Peanut</category><category>QualcommPeanut</category><category>radio</category><category>short range</category><category>ShortRange</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19646909</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cambridge scientists develop lower-than-low power WORM memory]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/cambridge-scientists-develop-lower-than-low-power-worm-memory/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/cambridge-scientists-develop-lower-than-low-power-worm-memory/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/cambridge-scientists-develop-lower-than-low-power-worm-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/cambridge-scientists-develop-lower-than-low-power-worm-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img border="1" align="right" vspace="14" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/wormmemory.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Researchers at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CambridgeUniversity/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Cambridge University</a> have recently published a paper on their new type of WORM (write once read many) memory which is even more low powered than the ones that came before it. The new electron-only design of the memory is solution processed, making it low cost as well as it requires no lithography. The device, using ZnO semiconductor <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nanoparticles?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">nanoparticles</a> to inject electrons into a polymer which is capable of conducting. The electrons are then used to program the memory by permanently lowering the conductivity of the polymer, producing insulation. This result is far lower power densities than previously recorded, by orders of magnitude. The research team believes that it can make further improvements to the device as they continue to work.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/cambridge-scientists-develop-lower-than-low-power-worm-memory/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cambridge university</category><category>CambridgeUniversity</category><category>efficiency</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>memory</category><category>nanoparticles</category><category>semiconductor</category><category>worm</category><category>write once read many</category><category>WriteOnceReadMany</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19620143</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ViewSonic outs energy efficient, earth-friendly VOT125 nettop -- won't help that there oil spill]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/viewsonicvot125pcmini-1274196964.jpg"  alt="" /></div>
Way back at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/event/ces-2010?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CES in January</a>, we spied <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/viewsonic-blitzes-ces-hdtvs-nettops-pmps-laptops-and-more/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ViewSonic's full offering</a>, and we caught wind then of the VOT125 nettop -- but we didn't really have any details to go on. Well, the company's officially announced the VOT125 PC Mini today, and the slim little guy looks pretty cute. Sold as a space-saving PC with green design, ViewSonic says that the VOT125 uses up to 90 percent less plastic than similar nettops, and consumes up to 90 percent less power, making use of a range of ultra low power Intel ULV CPUs. The VOT125 boasts 2GB of memory, a 250GB hard drive, four USB 2.0 ports, plus DVI / HDMI. You can grab one up starting today, and it's got a starting price of $499. The full PR follows. 

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>desktops</category><category>environmentally friendly</category><category>EnvironmentallyFriendly</category><category>green</category><category>green pc</category><category>GreenPc</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>nettop</category><category>nettops</category><category>power consumption</category><category>PowerConsumption</category><category>ulv</category><category>viewsonic</category><category>viewsonic vot125</category><category>ViewsonicVot125</category><category>VOT125</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:58:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19481671</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bluetooth 4.0 with low energy (almost) finally ready to roll]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/bluetooth-4-0-with-low-energy-almost-finally-ready-to-roll/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/bluetooth-4-0-with-low-energy-almost-finally-ready-to-roll/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/bluetooth-4-0-with-low-energy-almost-finally-ready-to-roll/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> </div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.bluetooth.com/English/Press/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?ID=101"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/4-20-10-bluetoothstandard4.0-1271820101.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a></div>
Molasses, snails and glaciers: none are slower than an organization developing a new wireless standard. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) is no exception -- it's been nearly three years since it announced it would <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/12/wibree-is-now-bluetooths-ultra-low-power-wireless-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">roll Wibree into Bluetooth</a> and four months since <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/bluetooth-4-0-finally-rolls-low-energy-tech-into-a-shipping-stan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">it made Bluetooth 4.0 official</a>, but still no dice. This week, the SIG says the low-power specification is ready for action, its minutiae finalized. However, fine print in the org's press release disagrees. The main reason for Bluetooth 4.0 was to include lower power devices, but that all-important integration is still pending a "before June 2010" completion date. That means we still won't see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/bluetooth-4-0-devices-to-make-the-scene-later-this-year/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bluetooth-toting cats</a> till the end of the year, and we have no idea what SIG has accomplished in the meanwhile. Press release after the break.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/21/bluetooth-4-0-with-low-energy-almost-finally-ready-to-roll/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bluetooth</category><category>Bluetooth 4</category><category>Bluetooth 4.0</category><category>bluetooth low energy</category><category>bluetooth SIG</category><category>Bluetooth4</category><category>Bluetooth4.0</category><category>BluetoothLowEnergy</category><category>BluetoothSig</category><category>BT</category><category>delay</category><category>low energy</category><category>low power</category><category>LowEnergy</category><category>LowPower</category><category>specification</category><category>specifications</category><category>Wibree</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19447904</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[LED traffic lights don't melt snow, do cause accidents]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/led-traffic-lights-dont-melt-snow-do-cause-accidents/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/led-traffic-lights-dont-melt-snow-do-cause-accidents/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/led-traffic-lights-dont-melt-snow-do-cause-accidents/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_re_us/us_snow_covered_stoplights"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/17dec9iuobsegf43.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" alt="" /></a>A number of cold weather American states are reporting their dismay at finding out that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/16/seville-readies-led-traffic-light-switch/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">LED traffic lights</a> are so energy efficient that they do not produce enough excess heat to dissipate any snow that covers them. It turns out, perhaps in an homage to bad engineering everywhere, that the inefficiency of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/24/incandescent-light-bulbs-be-to-shelved-by-2012-in-us/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">incandescent</a> light bulbs was previously <em>relied upon</em> to keep traffic signals unimpeded. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/04/taiwan-switching-to-led-traffic-lights/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">The new LEDs</a> do not achieve the same effect, which has resulted in a few accidents and even a death being blamed on obstructed traffic lights. Feel free to apply palm to face now. It's not all gloomy, though, as the majority of people are said to treat a dysfunctional traffic light as a stop sign (how clever of them), and a tech fix is being worked on as we speak.

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/led-traffic-lights-dont-melt-snow-do-cause-accidents/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>efficiency</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>facepalm</category><category>incandescent</category><category>led</category><category>led traffic lights</category><category>LedTrafficLights</category><category>light</category><category>light bulbs</category><category>LightBulbs</category><category>low power</category><category>LowPower</category><category>road safety</category><category>RoadSafety</category><category>safety</category><category>snow</category><category>traffic</category><category>traffic light</category><category>traffic lights</category><category>TrafficLight</category><category>TrafficLights</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19284804</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD 's new Athlon II processors aim to go easy on the power, your wallet]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/amd-s-new-athlon-ii-processors-aim-to-go-easy-on-the-power-you/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/amd-s-new-athlon-ii-processors-aim-to-go-easy-on-the-power-you/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/amd-s-new-athlon-ii-processors-aim-to-go-easy-on-the-power-you/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20091019006622&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct2009amdnewproc.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a></div>
AMD has just outed a selection of new Athlon II procs, which do little to help it reclaim <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/13/amds-3-4ghz-phenom-ii-x4-965-black-edition-review-roundup-fast/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the performance crown</a>, but will be of interest to anyone who likes to keep things minimal -- whether we're talking about prices or temperatures. Starting at $69 per chip (when bought in bulk) with the 2.7GHz dual-core X2 235e and topping out at $143 for the 2.3GHz quad-core X4 605e, AMD's new e-tagged processors operate within a 45W thermal envelope, as opposed to the relatively standard 65W TDP. The Sunnyvale outfit makes some ill-advised claims of "up to 75 percent" better performance versus comparable Intel CPUs -- the small print tells us that number is derived from 3DMark Vantage while testing with different GPUs -- but we suppose until the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/amd-to-bring-six-core-thuban-processor-to-the-consumer-realm/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Thuban six-core</a> shows up, AMD will have to take performance gains from wherever it can get 'em, including its own imagination.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/amd-s-new-athlon-ii-processors-aim-to-go-easy-on-the-power-you/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>3dmark</category><category>3dmark vantage</category><category>3dmarkVantage</category><category>amd</category><category>amd athlon</category><category>amd athlon ii</category><category>AmdAthlon</category><category>AmdAthlonIi</category><category>athlon</category><category>athlon ii</category><category>athlon ii x2</category><category>athlon ii x3</category><category>Athlon ii x4</category><category>AthlonIi</category><category>AthlonIiX2</category><category>AthlonIiX3</category><category>AthlonIiX4</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>cpu</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktop processor</category><category>DesktopProcessor</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>low energy</category><category>low power</category><category>LowEnergy</category><category>LowPower</category><category>processor</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19202017</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Texas Instruments CC2540 promises ultra-low energy Bluetooth]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/texas-instruments-demonstrates-worlds-first-coin-cell-demo-for-bluetoothr-low-energy-applications-at-bluetooth-low-energy-technology-conference-in-munich-64718712.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/oct1909_txibtlez.jpg?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/texasinstruments?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Texas Instruments</a> is pretty chuffed with itself right about now, as it's prepping to demonstrate a swell-sounding new system-on-chip that takes <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bluetooth?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bluetooth connectivity</a> to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/19/integrated-circuits-with-no-standby-power-could-be-in-use-by-yea/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">extreme reaches of low energy consumption</a>. About to be shown off in Munich tomorrow, the new CC2540 takes up a measly 6mm-squared of real estate, and is said to be able to operate for more than a year on a single button cell battery. With the reduced physical size and embedded Flash memory, this should be easier to install and update as necessary too. Considering the battery-draining ways of current Bluetooth tech, such claims sound preposterously awesome, but we'll keep our giddy enthusiasm in check until early next year when samples will begin rolling out. For now, you can check out the older video below 'splaining the prospective benefits in more detail.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/texas-instruments-demonstrates-worlds-first-coin-cell-demo-for-bluetoothr-low-energy-applications-at-bluetooth-low-energy-technology-conference-in-munich-64718712.html">Read</a> - Texas Instruments press release<br />
<a href="http://www.ti.com/ww/en/analog/bluetooth/index.htm?DCMP=BluetoothLowEnergy&amp;HQS=NotApplicable+OT+bluetoothlowenergy&amp;DCMP=hpa_rf_general&amp;HQS=Other+PR+bluetoothlowenergy-pr">Read</a> - Bluetooth low energy webpage<br />
<a href="http://community.ti.com/media/p/17641.aspx">Read</a> - Video explanation of Bluetooth low energy
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bluetooth</category><category>bluetooth low energy</category><category>BluetoothLowEnergy</category><category>CC2540</category><category>connectivity</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>low energy</category><category>low power</category><category>LowEnergy</category><category>LowPower</category><category>peripheral</category><category>peripherals</category><category>system-on-chip</category><category>texas instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>ti</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|19200545</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>