<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo LePhone K800 launches, officially brings Medfield to China]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc05559.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> At CES 2012, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lenovo">Lenovo</a> was the first to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-first-smartphone-lenovo-k800-launch-china-ces-2012/">announce</a> a Medfield-powered smartphone: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/lenovo-k800-intel-medfield-smartphone-hands-on/">the K800</a>. And while it was the first to be unveiled, it couldn't beat the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/">Lava Xolo X900</a> to market. Lenovo's not too worried about that, however, as the K800 has arrived in China right on schedule, having originally aimed for a Q2 launch and later refining the timeframe to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/">end of May</a>. The fruits of Intel's labor can be had for the grand 'ol retail price of RMB 3,299 ($524), which gets you a 1.6GHz CPU, 1GB of RAM, Android 2.3, a 4.5-inch 720p display, an 8MP rear camera and 16GB of internal storage. We haven't heard any news of the phone reaching across the Pacific, but we're sure that won't stop the most insistent of you from grabbing a unit through alternative methods, right?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/">Lenovo LePhone K800 launches, officially brings Medfield to China</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2012 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20247724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/lenovo-lephone-k800-medfield-launch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>android gingerbread</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>AndroidGingerbread</category><category>china</category><category>china unicom</category><category>ChinaUnicom</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>k800</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo k800</category><category>lenovo lephone k800</category><category>lenovo medfield</category><category>LenovoK800</category><category>LenovoLephoneK800</category><category>LenovoMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel posts x86-friendly Android 4.0 image, lets you feel the need for speed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/intel-android-image.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 431px;" /></a></p><p> Android developers are all too familiar with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/09/googles-android-emulator-gets-updated-with-gpu-support-better/">not-so-hot emulator performance</a>, so it's a relief that there's now an system image in a native x86 for testing. While you'll still likely want to test on ARM, the x86 image will both help ferret out bugs specific to Intel's architecture as well as provide a much faster experience debugging apps now that the ARM-to-Intel translation isn't needed on top of running a whole second operating system. It's not perfectly up to date, running on Android 4.0.3, but it's close enough that the environment will mimic much of what users see -- and a big help if you're jumping into writing specifically for Intel devices. If speed is of the essence, or you're not keen on importing a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/">Lava Xolo X900</a>, you just need to update the SDK Manager to start testing with an Intel-flavored green robot.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/">Intel posts x86-friendly Android 4.0 image, lets you feel the need for speed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 May 2012 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244501/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/intel-posts-x86-friendly-android-4-0-image/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android sdk</category><category>AndroidSdk</category><category>arm</category><category>atom</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>emulator</category><category>image</category><category>intel</category><category>lava</category><category>lava xolo x900</category><category>LavaXoloX900</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>sdk</category><category>software developer kit</category><category>SoftwareDeveloperKit</category><category>system image</category><category>SystemImage</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>tablet pcs</category><category>TabletPc</category><category>TabletPcs</category><category>tablets</category><category>x86</category><category>x900</category><category>xolo</category><category>xolo x900</category><category>XoloX900</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Huawei partners with Intel to test TD-LTE interoperability in China]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/"><img alt="Huawei partners with Intel to test TD-LTE interoperability in China" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/huawei-intel.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> In a classic case of east meets west, Huawei and Intel have joined forces to create an interoperability test lab that will focus on China's homegrown time-division LTE (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/td-lte">TD-LTE</a>) network. While the technology runs contrary to the more common frequency-division LTE (FD-LTE), the Chinese brand of 4G is situated to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/26/clearwires-tdd-lte-2013-new-york-city-chicago-seattle-san-francisco/">take root in the US</a> under Clearwire's banner. Through its partnership with Huawei, Chipzilla -- a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/">newbie</a> in the smartphone arena -- will be able to engage in end-to-end testing of its mobile equipment and verify its readiness for TD-LTE. For Huawei's part, it plans to use the test lab as a means to court other handset and chipset manufacturers, and hence drive the adoption of TD-LTE. Naturally, we're left wondering the obvious: whether this unique collaboration will bring about Huawei smartphones with Intel Inside. Mum's the word on that one... for now.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/">Huawei partners with Intel to test TD-LTE interoperability in China</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 May 2012 07:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20227659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/huawei-partners-with-intel-for-td-lte-tests/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>china</category><category>collaboration</category><category>huawei</category><category>intel</category><category>lte</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>partner</category><category>partners</category><category>partnership</category><category>td-lte</category><category>tdd-lte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 07:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lava's Medfield-based Xolo X900 smartphone gets reviewed by AnandTech]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/"><img alt="Image" height="437" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/lava-xolo-x900-revew.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> We briefly got our hands on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a>-based Xolo X900 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/">back in February</a>, and have seen some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/">benchmarks</a> from Lenovo's K800 (based on the same reference design), but <em>AnandTech</em> has now provided a typically thorough review of the device that's ushering in Intel's new push into smartphones. In short, the phone is a solid first step, but not something that <em>AnandTech</em> sees as a flagship device. Battery life is respectable and performance is even better (scoring among the top of the heap in most benchmarks), and both the screen and camera manage to impress, but <em>AnandTech</em> didn't find anything that pulled the device ahead of the competition. In its own words, "on the one hand it's a good thing that you can't tell an Intel smartphone apart from one running an ARM based SoC, on the other hand it does nothing to actually sell the Intel experience." Hit the source link below for the full review and benchmarks.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/">Lava's Medfield-based Xolo X900 smartphone gets reviewed by AnandTech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20224159/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/lavas-medfield-based-xolo-x900-smartphone-gets-reviewed-by-anan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>intel</category><category>lava</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>x900</category><category>xolo</category><category>xolo x900</category><category>XoloX900</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's first smartphone coming soon: Xolo X900 gets April 24 release date]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/"><img alt="Intel's first smartphone release date" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/xolo.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 509px; height: 420px;" /></a></p><p> Intel's first Atom smartphone is now available, and it's Lava's Xolo X900. It has managed to outpace both Lenovo's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/lenovo-k800-intel-medfield-smartphone-hands-on/">K800</a> and Orange's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/orange-santa-clara-hands-on/">Santa Clara</a>, arriving on the Indian carrier next Monday.  When we handled the Xolo X900 in Barcelona a few months ago, the 1.6 GHz Atom Z2460 processor seemed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/">pleasantly responsive</a>, although we were less enamoured with the phone's middling build quality. The four-inch 1024 x 600 display is accompanied by a one-megapixel camera on the front, plus a primary 8-megapixel shooter on the back capable of burst-shot photography. Despite its plastic build, Intel's new mobile offering won't come all that cheap; the Xolo X900 by Lava is priced off-contract at around 22,000 INR ($420). At the moment, we're still waiting to hear how Orange and Lenovo will price up their own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield/">Medfield</a>-powered offerings -- both are expected to emerge in the next few months.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel's first smartphone coming soon: Xolo X900 gets April 24 release date</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/">Intel's first smartphone coming soon: Xolo X900 gets April 24 release date</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20219206/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/intels-first-smartphone-release-date/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.5GHz</category><category>1.6 GHz Atom Z2460 processor</category><category>1.6GhzAtomZ2460Processor</category><category>Atom</category><category>India</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>intel smartphone</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>IntelSmartphone</category><category>Lava</category><category>Medfield</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>phones</category><category>xolo x900</category><category>XoloX900</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Medfield-packing Lenovo K800 to land next month, has an avatar in tow]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/"><img alt="Intel Medfield sporting Lenovo K800 to land next month, has an avatar in tow" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/lenovo-k800-sean.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>Wondering when the <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/lenovo-k800-intel-medfield-smartphone-hands-on/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/lenovo-k800-intel-medfield-smartphone-hands-on/">Lenovo K800</a> will finally land? Or perhaps you're curious about how those Medfield processors will <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/">perform</a> in real life? The answer to both those questions should be with us towards the end of next month -- according to Intel's Sean Maloney, who's hosting the Intel Developer Forum in Beijing right now. Announcing via microblogging site Sina Weibo, Maloney didn't go as far as fixing a date, but did go on to confirm that it will also be bringing the firm's new "Avatar Technology" with it (pictured after the break). What that is exactly, has yet to be revealed, but we're pretty sure / hopeful James Cameron's not involved.<br /><br /><strong>Update: </strong>Our sources indicated that the launch will be towards the end of May, but yeah, still exclusive to China.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Medfield-packing Lenovo K800 to land next month, has an avatar in tow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/">Intel Medfield-packing Lenovo K800 to land next month, has an avatar in tow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20212996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/11/intel-medfield-sporting-lenovo-k800-to-land-next-month-has-an-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avatar</category><category>avatar technology</category><category>AvatarTechnology</category><category>china</category><category>intel</category><category>intel avatar</category><category>intel avatar technology</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelAvatar</category><category>IntelAvatarTechnology</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>k800</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo k800</category><category>LenovoK800</category><category>medfield</category><category>sean maloney</category><category>SeanMaloney</category><category>weibo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/"><img alt="Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not the ambitious kind" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/lenovo-k800-quadrant.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 450px;" /></a></div>If Lenovo's sticking to its promise, it should only be another two months maximum before its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Intel Medfield</a>-powered K800 smartphone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-first-smartphone-lenovo-k800-launch-china-ces-2012/">debuts</a> in China. Until then, we won't know the full potential of the 1.6GHz Atom Z2460 powering Ice Cream Sandwich, but we do have the next best thing for now: what we've just obtained are some benchmark results from a K800 prototype with Android 2.3.7, and while the graphics performance wasn't top notch this time round, the general score performance came close to that of the Galaxy Note (powered by a 1.4GHz dual-core Exynos chipset).<br /><br />However, the K800 did beat pretty much everyone -- including the brand-spanking-new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/one+x">One X</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/one+s">One S</a> from HTC -- in the SunSpider 0.91 Javascript test, where it only took 1,270ms to complete! What remains to be seen is whether Medfield will really deliver a better battery performance than its competitors; so until we find the answer (along with improved scores) on a final unit, you'll just have to make do with our list of scores after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/">Lenovo K800's initial benchmark scores look promising, but not ambitious</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20210333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/lenovo-k800-benchmark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.6ghz</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3.7</category><category>Android2.3.7</category><category>atom</category><category>atom z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>benchmark</category><category>cellphone</category><category>exclusive</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>intel</category><category>k800</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo k800</category><category>LenovoK800</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobile phone</category><category>MobilePhone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>phone</category><category>smartphone</category><category>z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Orange's Santa Clara Medfield phone gets benchmarked, well, the browser does]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/"><img alt="Santa Clara Vellamo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/intel-550x391.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Wondering how those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/">Medfield</a> handsets stack up to their ARM-powered competition? Well, we can't promise a full suite of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">benchmarks</a> just yet, but we do have a peek at a pair of browser-centric tests. The German Caschys Blog managed to get a hold of Orange's upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/orange-santa-clara-hands-on/">Santa Clara</a> device at CeBit and ran Qualcomm's Vellamo and Rightware's BrowserMark on the Atom handset. In both metrics the Z2460 more than holds its own, scoring an 89,180 on the web-based BrowserMark -- putting it just ahead of the iPhone 4S which clocks in at 87,801, but well behind the Galaxy Nexus' 98,272. Things look just as promising on the slightly more hardware-intensive Vellamo where it trounced the latest Nexus and was hot on the heels of the Xiaomi Mi-One Plus and Transformer Prime. Of course, neither of these tests really tax the CPU or measure 3D graphics performance. We're not even sure what the clock speed on chip inside the handset is. We were originally led to believe <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/orange-santa-clara-intel-medfield/">1.6GHz</a>, though, Caschy is reporting the model he manhandled was running at just 1.4GHz. Then, there's perhaps the biggest question of all -- battery life. For that, we'll just have to wait and see.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/">Orange's Santa Clara Medfield phone gets benchmarked, well, the browser does</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/oranges-santa-clara-medfield-phone-gets-benchmarked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>atom z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>browsermark</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel atom z2460</category><category>IntelAtomZ2460</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>orange</category><category>orange santa clara</category><category>OrangeSantaClara</category><category>Qualcomm Vellamo</category><category>QualcommVellamo</category><category>Rightware</category><category>Rightware Browsermark</category><category>RightwareBrowsermark</category><category>santa clara</category><category>SantaClara</category><category>test</category><category>tests</category><category>Vellamo</category><category>z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress 2012: best of show]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/mwc2012bestoftheshowmain.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Mobile World Congress 2012 was a massively exciting show and true to form brought us so much new kit to be excited about in early 2012. From Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> launch, a 41-megapixel smartphone, a new generation of personal hotspots and even engineered metals using micro arc oxidation, there was never a dull moment. Highlighting what was best, most innovative, or interesting is a tough nut but we've done our best to point out the highlights using our impressions -- and the occasional arm-wrestling match -- to chose the finalists amongst the products and our Editor's more notable achievements. Fly through to the next page and have a look at our takeaways from this, the most intense mobile tech show of the year.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mobile World Congress 2012: best of show</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/">Mobile World Congress 2012: best of show</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20185120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/03/mobile-world-congress-2012-best-of-show/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>808</category><category>acer</category><category>atom</category><category>best of</category><category>BestOf</category><category>eluga</category><category>galaxy note</category><category>GalaxyNote</category><category>htc</category><category>intel</category><category>may smythe</category><category>MaySmythe</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>nokia</category><category>note 10.1</category><category>Note10.1</category><category>One S</category><category>One X</category><category>OneS</category><category>OneX</category><category>Option</category><category>padphone</category><category>panasonic</category><category>pureview</category><category>pureview 808</category><category>Pureview808</category><category>round up</category><category>round-up</category><category>RoundUp</category><category>samsung</category><category>xyfi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolomain.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield-based Android smartphones</a> have been buzzed about for sometime now, but until this past CES, we hadn't actually seen one of these unicorns <em>en vivo</em>. No longer, as the chip manufacturer outed a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/">trio of those very handsets</a> today at its MWC event. Of particular note is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/">Xolo by Lava</a>, a 4.03-inch, single-core unit running a mostly stock build of Gingerbread and destined for the Indian market. We spent time getting to know the device, so follow on past the break as we parse through its finer qualities.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/">Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#4849208"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolo0_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#4849216"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolo1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#4849217"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolo2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#4849218"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolo3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#4849219"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/mwc2012xolo4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/">Intel's Xolo X900 by Lava hands-on (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180763/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intels-xolo-x900-by-lava-hands-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Android 2.3</category><category>Android 2.3.7</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Android2.3.7</category><category>hands-on</category><category>Intel</category><category>Lava</category><category>Medfield</category><category>Mobile World Congress</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MobileWorldCongress</category><category>MWC</category><category>MWC 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>video</category><category>Xolo</category><category>Xolo X900</category><category>Xolo X900 by Lava</category><category>XoloX900</category><category>XoloX900ByLava</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lava brings Intel-based smartphones to India with the XOLO X900]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/intel-xolo-x900.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Intel has already announced a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/orange-santa-clara-intel-medfield/">partnership with Orange</a> to bring the first Intel-based smartphone to Europe, and it's now also announced a deal with Lava International to bring a similar phone to India. Like the Orange phone, this new XOLO X900 is based on Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/">reference design</a>, and packs a 1.6GHz Atom Z2460 processor, a high-res 4-inch display (presumably the same 600 x 1024), front and rear-facing cameras, support for HSPA+ networks, built-in NFC, and HDMI connectivity -- plus what appears to be stock Android 2.3 for an OS, with no mention of a possible ICS upgrade just yet. Still no firm word on launch details for the phone either, but Intel says it's expected to be available early in the second quarter of this year.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lava brings Intel-based smartphones to India with the XOLO X900</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/">Lava brings Intel-based smartphones to India with the XOLO X900</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/lava-brings-intel-based-smartphones-to-india-with-the-xolo-x900/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>atom</category><category>Atom Z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>india</category><category>intel</category><category>lava</category><category>lava international</category><category>LavaInternational</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>x900</category><category>xolo</category><category>xolo x900</category><category>XoloX900</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/2-27-2011intelatommedfield.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>The age of Medfield is upon us. At <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mwc2012">Mobile World Congress</a> Intel took the wraps off its smartphone platform, ditched the code name and gave us some details on three different Atom chips destined for handsets. The Z2460 is currently shipping and serves as the heart of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/">reference platform</a> that devices from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/lenovo-k800-intel-medfield-smartphone-hands-on/">Lenovo</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/orange-santa-clara-intel-medfield/">Orange</a>, Lava and ZTE are based on. The processor can hit clock speeds of 2GHz and packs an Intel XMM 6260 HSPA+ radio. The next generation part, dubbed the Z2580 will supposedly double performance and gets upgraded to an XMM 7160, which adds LTE to its cellular arsenal. Down the road Chipzilla also plans to introduce a "value smartphone" processor, dubbed the Z2000. Clocked at only 1GHz and going with a 6265 HSPA+ radio, the goal is to power Android phones that can be sold for less than $150 -- <em>unsubsidized</em>. Sounds crazy, but it's true. To bring this vision to fruition Intel has added Orange, ZTE, Lava and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/">Visa</a> to its list of partners. Check out the PR after the break for more details.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/">Intel details Medfield plans, announces a trio of phone-friendly Atoms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/intel-details-medfield-plans-announces-a-trio-of-phone-friendly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>atom z2000</category><category>atom z2460</category><category>atom Z2580</category><category>AtomZ2000</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>AtomZ2580</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>lava</category><category>Medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>orange</category><category>visa</category><category>z2000</category><category>Z2460</category><category>Z2580</category><category>zte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Visa certifies Intel's Smartphone Reference Device, payWave hits Medfield]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/visa.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>Sure, if you're running a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/19/a-week-with-google-wallet-video/">Google Wallet</a>-having device you're <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/polyamorous-google-wallet-adds-visa-to-its-arsenal/">already down</a> with Visa's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/paywave">payWave</a> wireless payment service, but we can now confidently say that Intel-based smartphones will also be similarly enabled, even if they haven't been blessed by the Big G. At its Mobile World Congress press conference, Intel just announced that its Medfield-based Smartphone Reference Device, the one we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/">saw previously at CES</a>, is now Visa-certified. Users will be able to tie their credit card to their handset and, once done, make secure payments to retail terminals over NFC. Your wallet of the future just got a little bit lighter.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Visa certifies Intel's Smartphone Reference Device, payWave hits Medfield</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/">Visa certifies Intel's Smartphone Reference Device, payWave hits Medfield</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/visa-paywave-hits-intel-medfield/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2012</category><category>Mwc2012</category><category>paywave</category><category>smartphone</category><category>visa</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Desktop apps may run on Win8 for ARM after all... maybe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/"><img alt="Windows 8" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc01042-1326158011.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 399px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>The issue of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/will-windows-8-for-arm-tablets-cut-the-cord-on-desktop-mode/">whether</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/intel-vp-confirms-arm-versions-of-windows-8-will-offer-no-compat/">not</a> the ARM edition of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/windows-8-details-new-features-ui-enhancements-and-everything/">Windows 8</a> will support both desktop and Metro-style apps has been pretty hazy. Some have claimed it would, others that it wont and, even when they've issued <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/microsoft-rebuts-intels-claims-about-windows-8-calls-them-fac/">denials</a> of the nay-sayers, Microsoft has stopped short of saying that ARM hardware would offer a desktop mode for non-Metro apps. Well, buried in a post about improving power efficiency over at MSDN blogs was a passing reference to "both desktop and Metro style apps" running on "System on Chip (SoC) architectures." Some, including the well regarded Mary Jo Foley, have read this to mean that desktop apps will indeed work on ARM-powered Windows tablets. Now, this seems to make sense since all of the SoC coverage has been focused on the powerful new RISC chips getting crammed in new slates and smartphones, and we've heard that Win8 and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/windows-phone-8-detailed/">Windows Phone 8 </a>will share the same kernel. But, there is one tiny wrinkle in this narrative -- Intel will have its own SoC solutions soon enough thanks to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Medfield</a>, so the passage could simply be a reference to those x86 chips. You'll find the relevant excerpt at the via link.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/">Desktop apps may run on Win8 for ARM after all... maybe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20166693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/desktop-apps-may-run-on-win8-for-arm-after-all-maybe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arm</category><category>mary jo foley</category><category>MaryJoFoley</category><category>medfield</category><category>microsoft</category><category>soc</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>system on chip</category><category>system-on-chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><category>SystemOnChip</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>windows 8</category><category>windows 8 arm</category><category>windows on arm</category><category>Windows8</category><category>Windows8Arm</category><category>WindowsOnArm</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola and Intel hold hands for multi-year, multi-device partnership, shipments start 2H 2012]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="live_update" style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/"><img class="live_image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/cesliveblog0379.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Well, look who just showed up at Intel's CES 2012 keynote? Motorola Mobility's own Sanjay Jha just grabbed a bit of the limelight -- long enough to announce a multi-year, multi-device agreement that should see Intel's Medfield chips powering Moto's hardware (the second announced behind <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-first-smartphone-lenovo-k800-launch-china-ces-2012/">Lenovo</a>) in the not-too-distant future. Naturally, we're <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/google-acquiring-motorola-mobility/">guessing</a> Android will be the OS of choice here, but we can only guess what Motorola's going to do when all of its other chip partners come knocking with new questions.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: We've <a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/01/10/intel-raises-bar-on-smartphones-tablets-and-ultrabook-devices">learned</a> that product shipments from the partnership will start in the second half of this year.<br />
<br />
<em>Follow along at our Intel liveblog <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/">here</a>!</em><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motorola and Intel hold hands for multi-year, multi-device partnership, shipments start 2H 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/">Motorola and Intel hold hands for multi-year, multi-device partnership, shipments start 2H 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20145727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/motorola-intel-android-smartphone-partnership/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>atom</category><category>atom Z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>breaking news</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2012</category><category>Ces2012</category><category>google</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>moto</category><category>motorola</category><category>os</category><category>platform</category><category>smartphone</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel demos Lenovo-made Medfield IdeaPad K2110 tablet running Ice Cream Sandwich (eyes-on)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/lenovo-medfield-tablet.jpg" vspace="4" /></div>
<div>
	Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/">smartphone reference design</a> wasn't the only Medfield-based device on display here at CES. Wandering around Chipzilla's sprawling demo area, we also spotted an unnamed, 10-inch tablet made by Lenovo. And unlike that handset, this is a product that will ship in more or less the form we're seeing it today. Unfortunately, though, we were strictly forbidden from actually touching the thing. For now, at least, we know what lies beneath that 1366 x 768 display. In addition to a 32nm low-power Atom processor, it has NFC, WiFi (natch) and a battery rated for 10 hours of active use and 30 days of standby.<br />
	<br />
	As with the smartphone, Intel is really keen on talking up Medfield's graphics muscle, and we were once again treated to a series of gaming and application demonstrations. Watch the video for yourself, but we couldn't for the life of us see any stutter in that app walk-through: both 3D rendering and gestures like pinch to zoom seemed silky smooth from where we were sitting. So, what say you? Impressed?<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/">Lenovo Medfield tablet at CES 2012</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/#4737282"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09385_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/#4737283"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09383_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/#4737286"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09380_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/#4737287"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09379_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-medfield-tablet-at-ces-2012/#4737289"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09378_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel demos Lenovo-made Medfield IdeaPad K2110 tablet running Ice Cream Sandwich (eyes-on)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/">Intel demos Lenovo-made Medfield IdeaPad K2110 tablet running Ice Cream Sandwich (eyes-on)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20145527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-lenovo-made-medfield-tablet-running-ice-cream-sandwi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10 inch tablet</category><category>10-inch tablet</category><category>10-inchTablet</category><category>10InchTablet</category><category>Android tablet</category><category>Android tablets</category><category>AndroidTablet</category><category>AndroidTablets</category><category>CES</category><category>CES 2012</category><category>Ces2012</category><category>ces2012bestof</category><category>Ice Cream Sandwich</category><category>IceCreamSandwich</category><category>ICS</category><category>ICS tablet</category><category>ICS tablets</category><category>IcsTablet</category><category>IcsTablets</category><category>IdeaPad</category><category>IdeaPad K2110</category><category>IdeapadK2110</category><category>Intel</category><category>K2110</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>medfield</category><category>Medfield tablet</category><category>MedfieldTablet</category><category>NFC</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel demos Medfield-based smartphone reference design at CES (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/intel-smartphone-reference.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<div>
	There we go! Head past all the months-old Ultrabooks in Intel's CES booth, and you'll stumble across something less pedestrian: a reference smartphone, based on the chipmaker's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> platform. How it looks is irrelevant, really -- that chintzy, fingerprint-prone slab of plastic offers no hints as to what the Samsungs and HTCs of the smartphone world are going to create. What matters here is what's inside: this 4-inch handset packs a single-core 1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2460 chip, XXM 6260 modem and Intel GMA graphics, along with your requisite WiFi radio, accelerometer, etc. (Intel had Gingerbread installed, though that'll hardly be current by the time Medfield starts shipping.)<br />
	<br />
	Though battery life will naturally vary by manufacturer, this particular device houses a 1,460mAh juicepack promising 45 hours of audio playback, eight hours of 3G voice calls, five hours of 3G browsing or 14 days of standby. At the same time, Intel was demoing <em>Modern Combat 2</em>, as you can see in that lead shot, and playing HD video playing through the phone's micro-HDMI slot. Look closely at those videos below, and you'll see the output is mostly smooth with some slight stuttering, though trust us when we say video playback and gaming were more fluid on the device itself. Have a peek below and judge for yourselves, and hopefully one day in the not-too-distant future we'll be able to size up the battery life situation too.<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/">Intel smartphone reference design at CES 2012</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/#4737246"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09377_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/#4737269"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09322_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/#4737247"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09376_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/#4737248"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09366_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-2012/#4737249"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc09364_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel demos Medfield-based smartphone reference design at CES (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/">Intel demos Medfield-based smartphone reference design at CES (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20145448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-demos-medfield-based-smartphone-reference-design-at-ces-v/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Atom</category><category>Atom Z2460</category><category>AtomZ2460</category><category>CEs</category><category>CES 2012</category><category>Ces2012</category><category>ces2012bestof</category><category>Gingerbread</category><category>Google</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>Medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>reference</category><category>reference design</category><category>ReferenceDesign</category><category>video</category><category>Z2460</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/"><img alt="Medfield" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/intcmedfieldtabletplatfo.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> may still be a ways from breaking into the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">smartphone</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">tablet</a> market, but we're finally starting to get some concrete details on its specs and capabilities. <em>VR-Zone</em> got the nitty gritty on Chipzilla's first <em>true</em> SoC and it looks almost ready to run with the big dogs. A reference tablet, running at 1.6GHz with 1GB of RAM (which also packs Bluetooth, WiFi and FM radio) was put through some Android benchmarks and held it's own against a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> and a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/snapdragon">Snapdragon</a> MSM8260 -- which pulled a 7,500 and 8,000 in Caffeinemark 3, respectively. The admittedly higher clocked Atom scored an impressive 10,500, though power consumption on the pre-production chips was a bit higher than anticipated. At idle, the fledgling Medfield was sucking down 2.6W and spiking to 3.6W under load. Ultimately Intel hopes to cut those numbers to 2W at idle and 2.6W while pushing out HD video -- not far off from current-gen ARM SoC. Lets not forget though, benchmarks only tell part of the story -- we'll be waiting to see working hardware before declaring a victor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/">Intel's 32nm Medfield SoC specs and benchmarks leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/intels-32nm-medfield-soc-specs-and-benchmarks-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>caffeinemark</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>leak</category><category>leaked</category><category>leaks</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>soc</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel merges four mobile units into one, argument over parking spaces forthcoming]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/ces2011boothtours.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Intel is combining its netbook and tablets, ultra-mobility, mobile communications and mobile wireless divisions into a "Mobile and Communications" super-unit. It's aiming to catch up with the portable chip big boys like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/qualcomm-announces-a-slew-of-new-snapdragon-processors-upgrades/">Qualcomm</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/">NVIDIA</a>. Santa Clara's chips may power 80 percent of the world's desktops and laptops, but in the mobile space the energy efficient <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/25/arm-doubles-q3-profit-sees-surge-in-revenue-is-understandably/">ARM</a> (and its multiple licensees) is king. The new unit will be headed by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/16/intel-snaps-up-former-palm-and-apple-vp-mike-bell-for-its-smartp/">Mike Bell</a> and Hermann Eul and will be in charge of speeding up the development of future blockbuster mobile chips, as well as ensuring a good launch for the 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">Medfield</a> when it arrives early next year -- it's got some <strike>massive</strike> dainty smartphone shoes to fill.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/">Intel merges four mobile units into one, argument over parking spaces forthcoming</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20128484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/15/intel-merges-four-mobile-units-into-one-argument-over-parking-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ARM</category><category>CPUs</category><category>Hermann Eul</category><category>HermannEul</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Mobile and Communications</category><category>IntelMobileAndCommunications</category><category>Medfield</category><category>Mike Bell</category><category>MikeBell</category><category>Mobile and Communications</category><category>MobileAndCommunications</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>NVIDIA</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Smartphone</category><category>Tablets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2011 wrap-up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/idfrecapdantetktk-1316503706.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
We came, we saw, we conquered -- and just like that, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IDF+2011">Intel's Developer Forum</a> was over. Much like years past, Chipzilla was proudly beating its own drum: we saw demos of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-hypes-ivy-bridge-leaves-poor-old-sandy-in-its-wake/">Ivy Bridge</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/">Haswell</a>, a healthy helping of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Ultrabook">Ultrabooks</a> and of course its high speed interconnect <em>du jour</em>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Thunderbolt">Thunderbolt</a>. But that doesn't mean we didn't see a lot of other <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-shows-disaster-management-tech-at-idf-casts-fireballs/">random</a>, mind-stimulating <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/18/legos-augmented-reality-at-idf-eyes-on-video/">otherness</a>. Did you catch all the treasures we found lurking deep within the halls of this year's show? Unfortunately, we can't tell from here, so you better hop past the break for the full listing and find out.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2011 wrap-up</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/">Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2011 wrap-up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20047054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/20/intel-developer-forum-idf-2011-wrap-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aava mobile</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>asus</category><category>cpu</category><category>developer forum</category><category>DeveloperForum</category><category>eyefinity</category><category>haswell</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2011</category><category>Idf2011</category><category>intel</category><category>intel developer forum</category><category>IntelDeveloperForum</category><category>medfield</category><category>msi</category><category>processor</category><category>realvnc</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><category>solar</category><category>solar power</category><category>solar-power</category><category>solar-powered</category><category>SolarPower</category><category>thunderbolt</category><category>ultrabook</category><category>ultrabooks</category><category>ux21</category><category>ux31</category><category>wrap up</category><category>WrapUp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dante Cesa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/dantemedfieldintel.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Google's Andy Rubin just came up on stage here at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IDF+2011/">IDF</a> keynote, joining Intel CEO Paul Otellini who was holding a bona fide <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a>-powered smartphone running Android 2.3 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Gingerbread/">Gingerbread</a>)! Hard to be sure, but the device looks eerily like the Aava Mobile handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/">we've seen before</a>. The cameo was part of a much larger initiative, which will see Intel working concurrently with Google in order to optimize future processors for use with Android. We were actually tipped off on this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/intel-reveals-january-2012-gingerbread-arrival-for-the-atom-e6xx/">a few days back</a>, but at the time, it was difficult to tell how much of a consumer impact it'd have. Given Andy's showing, though, it's looking better and better in that regard. The most impressive tidbit, however, is the promise that all future Android builds will be "optimized" for Intel's low-power Atom clan. We've compiled a gallery for you below, and hopefully we'll have a hands-on later today.<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/">Intel's Medfield based Android smartphone</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442020"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442019"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442017"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/medfield_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442016"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/img8595_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
	<em>Dante Cesa contributed to this report</em>.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20041705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aava Mobile</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>breaking news</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2011</category><category>Idf2011</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>Paul Ottellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>PaulOttellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriam Joire]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget Primed: are multi-core chips worth the investment?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<em><strong>Primed </strong>goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day -- we dig deep into each topic's history and how it benefits our lives. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at <strong>primed *at* engadget *dawt* com</strong>.</em><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<br />
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/eng-primed-logo-600-1324060438.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
</div>
My, how times have changed over the last eight months. At <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ces+2011/">CES 2011</a>, we ecstatically witnessed the introduction of mobile devices with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dual-core/">dual-core CPUs</a> and drooled over the possibilities we'd soon have at our fingertips. Now, we look down at anything that doesn't have more than one core -- regardless of its performance. Not only are these new chips quickly becoming mainstream, Moore's Law is in full effect with our handheld devices since tri-core and quad-core systems are just over the horizon. We can't even fathom what's in the pipeline for the year 2015 and beyond (we don't think we're too far away from that 3D shark seen in <i>Back to the Future 2</i>).<br />
<br />
Let's not get <em>too </em>far ahead of ourselves here, however. After all, we first need to wrap our puny human minds around the idea of what this newfound power can do, and why it's changing the entire landscape of smartphones and tablets. In this edition of Primed, we'll focus on why multicore technology makes such a difference in the way we use our handheld devices, whether we should even consider purchasing a handset with a single-core chip inside, and why one-core tech is <i>so</i> 2010. Check out the whole enchilada after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget Primed: are multi-core chips worth the investment?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/">Engadget Primed: are multi-core chips worth the investment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20001047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/29/engadget-primed-are-multi-core-chips-worth-the-investment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ARM</category><category>arm cortex</category><category>arm cortex a9</category><category>ArmCortex</category><category>ArmCortexA9</category><category>cortex a15</category><category>cortex a9</category><category>CortexA15</category><category>CortexA9</category><category>cpu</category><category>dual core</category><category>dual-core</category><category>DualCore</category><category>engadget primed</category><category>EngadgetPrimed</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>intel oak trail</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>IntelOakTrail</category><category>kal-el</category><category>medfield</category><category>multi core</category><category>multi-core</category><category>MultiCore</category><category>nvidia</category><category>oak trail</category><category>OakTrail</category><category>phone cpu</category><category>PhoneCpu</category><category>primed</category><category>processor</category><category>quad core</category><category>quad-core</category><category>QuadCore</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>samsung</category><category>snapdragon</category><category>tablet cpu</category><category>TabletCpu</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>tegra 3</category><category>Tegra2</category><category>Tegra3</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x0531bu23eds.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Intel took the opportunity at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/computex">Computex</a> to update the tech-loving world on its processor plans, and it looks like those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/">whispers</a> we heard about low power and an accelerated Atom roadmap were spot on. Executive VP Sean Maloney didn't divulge specific TDPs but did confirm that we could look forward to reduced power consumption and sleek designs in 2012. The Intel exec declared that new class of PC, dubbed "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/asus-outs-ux21-ultrathin-laptop-with-up-to-core-i7-cpu-video-ha/">Ultrabooks</a>," will make up 40-percent of the market by the end of 2012. These machines, powered by the 22nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">Ivy Bridge</a>, will be less than 0.8-inches thick and start at under $1,000 -- which sounds just like the lines we were fed about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/19/intels-culv-platform-guns-for-amds-neo-danger-will-robinson/">CULV</a> chips back in 2009.<br />
<br />
Maloney also confirmed that, going forward, the Atom line would be getting a die shrink every year, as opposed to every two. The upcoming, 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cedartrail">Cedar Trail</a> will usher in the new Moore's Law-smashing era with promises of a 10 hour battery life and weeks of standby, and will be succeeded by 22nm and 14nm models. Intel even talked up Medfield, it's Atom variant designed specifically for smartphones and tablets, and showed off <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/18/intel-promises-more-than-10-new-tablets-at-computex-including-a/">more than 10 tablets</a> based on the Oak Trail-flavored <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/intel-rolls-out-atom-z670-oak-trail-processor-for-tablets/">Z670</a>. With AMD merely a fading blip in the company's rearview mirror it looks like Chipzilla is gunning for all those ARM-touting manufacturers. Check out the full PR after the break.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/">Intel's Computex 2011 keynote</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176971"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531403e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176972"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531404e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176973"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531405e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176974"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531406e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-computex-2011-keynote/#4176975"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11a531407e6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/">Intel reveals skinny Ivy Bridge 'Ultrabooks,' Moore's Law-defying Atoms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 May 2011 23:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19953609/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/30/intel-reveals-skinny-ivy-bridge-ultrabooks-moores-law-defyin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nm</category><category>22nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>3d transistor</category><category>3d transistors</category><category>3dTransistor</category><category>3dTransistors</category><category>asus</category><category>asus ux21</category><category>AsusUx21</category><category>atom</category><category>cedar trail</category><category>CedarTrail</category><category>computex</category><category>computex 2011</category><category>Computex2011</category><category>culv</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>intel core</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelCore</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>medfield</category><category>netbook</category><category>netbooks</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>oak trail</category><category>OakTrail</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>sean maloney</category><category>SeanMaloney</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>ultrabook</category><category>ultrabooks</category><category>ulv</category><category>ux21</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/medfield-phone-01-31-2011.jpg" /></a></div>
After Intel's early <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/intel-demos-iphone-like-mid-of-the-future/">smartphone</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/05/intel-reaches-for-the-smartphone-zone-with-moorestown-based-at/">ambitions</a> failed to bear fruit, experiencing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">delay</a> after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">delay</a>, the company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">seemingly decided</a> it'd be a bad idea to give reporters so much as a ballpark release date. Well, the company's confidence must have returned, because CEO Paul Otellini just told investors that those 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> smartphones are indeed on the way. "You'll see the first Intel-based phones in the first part of next year," he said at the company's annual investor meeting today, adding later that there will be "phones shipping in the market from major players" at that time. Here's hoping.<br />
<br />
Why all the delays? Intel blamed its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-and-nokia-officially-partner-on-mobile-devices-the-possi/">partnership with Nokia</a>, calling it a mistake. "In hindsight, Nokia was the wrong partner to have picked," said Otellini, but told attendees that the time both companies spent working together won't be wasted entirely: Intel is currently shopping around their co-developed handset as a reference design.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/">Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19942869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>Intel</category><category>Medfield</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>phone</category><category>reference design</category><category>ReferenceDesign</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel porting Honeycomb to its tablets, Medfield smartphones on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/android-honeycomb-logo-intel-buzz-small.jpg" /></a></div>
Corporate earnings calls can be tedious affairs. But sometimes, if you listen closely enough, you'll be treated to a nugget of product strategy in between those bursts of mind-numbing financial data. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/19/intel-shocks-everyone-including-itself-with-record-q1-earnings/">Intel's call</a> was just such an affair, with chief Paul S. Otellini providing a quick update on Intel's tablet and smartphone plans. Regarding the emerging tablet market, Otellini said that Intel will have "quite a bit of tablet demonstrations" at Computex <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/intel-rolls-out-atom-z670-oak-trail-processor-for-tablets/">running MeeGo, Windows, and Android</a> operating systems. "We're heads down on a number of designs on tablets on all three of those operating systems," he added. Regarding Android, Intel's fifth CEO said, "We've received Android code - the Honeycomb version of Android source code - from Google, and we're actively doing the port on that, and expect to be able to ramp those machines over the course of this year for a number of customers." Yes, we're looking at you right now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/">Acer -- wink, wink</a>. <br />
<br />
Regarding smarpthones, Otellini told reporters and analysts, "In terms of phones, obviously, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/">we lost Nokia</a>, which took a lot of the wind out of the sails for phones this year. We've redirected those resources onto a number of other major accounts focusing on carriers who want their own devices and also own handset manufacturers. They are all based on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/">Medfield</a>." With regards to timing, Otellini observed, "The limit in terms of them getting to market is going to be the interoperability testing of the networks at this point in time. I would be very disappointed if we didn't see Intel-based phones for sale 12 months from now." Us too Paul, us too... <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/18/samsung-promises-a-dual-core-2ghz-smartphone-by-next-year/">ARM's not exactly standing still</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">Intel porting Honeycomb to its tablets, Medfield smartphones on the way</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19918507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 3.0</category><category>Android3.0</category><category>google</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>smartphone</category><category>strategy</category><category>tablet</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's first Medfield-based smartphone to be a ZTE?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/intel-medfield-2011-04-12.jpg" alt="Intel's first Medfield-based smartphone to be a ZTE?" /></a></div>
It wasn't that long ago that Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/">pulled a Dell</a>, Anand Chandrasekher showing off a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/">fancy new thing</a> then quickly hiding it away out of sight. That was a Medfield-based smartphone, an Atom-powered mobile that the company pledges is built on "the most efficient architecture on the planet." Whether that's the case remains to be seen, as we're still waiting on any sort of details on that mystery phone, but according to <em>Businessweek</em> one question has been answered: the manufacturer. Intel is said to be working to design the handset for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/zte">ZTE</a>, the 32nm processor expected to provide decent performance and high efficiency for a mid-range smartphone. Now, ZTE has certainly been trying to make waves on the US market of late, but we can't help thinking Intel's going to need a somewhat higher profile partner before it really starts hitting ARM where it hurts.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/">Intel's first Medfield-based smartphone to be a ZTE?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19910177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/12/intels-first-medfield-based-smartphone-to-be-a-zte/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>china</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>processor</category><category>smartphone</category><category>zte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Editorial: Intel keeps pushing MeeGo, but why?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/02-14-11meegoad.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
If you hadn't noticed, Intel's running huge <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/meego">MeeGo</a> ads all over the place today, including here on Engadget. That's got our attention for a few reasons: first, our editorial staff wants the hair-trigger audio playback and content-obscuring animation disabled as badly as you do, and second, we're sort of wondering what Intel is trying to accomplish by pushing MeeGo now that Nokia has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-meego-not-dead-still-shipping-this-year/">strongly backed away from the OS</a> in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-and-microsoft-enter-strategic-alliance-on-windows-phone-b/">favor of Windows Phone 7</a>. It's hard to understand, especially since Intel's directing these ads at developers -- who's going to develop apps for a platform that has zero shipping mass-market devices? And even if there were a groundswell of MeeGo development action, why is Intel leading the charge, when it has yet to ship any chips suitable for a phone or tablet, and MeeGo tablet development appears to have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-shows-off-more-of-its-meego-tablet-ui-still-needs-lots-of/">completely stalled out</a>? It's very curious.<br />
<br />
Now, we have great faith in Intel -- the company is smart, capable, and big enough to succeed at anything it wants to, and it's made it very clear at MWC that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/">devices with Medfield mobile processors <em>will</em> ship</a> sometime this year and be competitive with the best of what ARM can offer. That will be an enormous and noteworthy accomplishment when it happens -- Intel's been promising a serious mobile chip for years now, and it'll be exciting to see the company finally join the race. But let's be honest: any viable Medfield device will be running Android, not MeeGo. To quote Nokia's Stephen Elop, the battle of devices has become a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/08/nokia-ceo-stephen-elop-rallies-troops-in-brutally-honest-burnin/">war of ecosystems</a>, and MeeGo simply doesn't offer an ecosystem that's competitive with iOS, Android, or what Nokia and Microsoft are planning to build with Windows Phone 7. It's a harsh truth, but it's inescapable. Sure, maybe Intel can convince a second-tier manufacturer to ship a Medfield / MeeGo device -- it's using the Atom-based <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/exopc">ExoPC Slate</a> to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-shows-off-more-of-its-meego-tablet-ui-still-needs-lots-of/">demo the MeeGo tablet UI</a>, for example -- but it's simply not going to entice the Samsungs and HTCs of the world to invest the serious capital required to make MeeGo a success without some sort of major industry disruption.<br />
<br />
Now, that disruption isn't impossible to imagine -- let's say one of the various <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/android,patent">IP lawsuits aimed at Android</a> is successful, or something -- but unless and until that happens, we'd say Intel's far better off investing its resources into working with a vendor on a top-tier Android handset that can run with something like the Motorola Atrix 4G or the HTC Thunderbolt. That's a sure way to get back into the conversation -- and after years of empty promises around <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/moorestown">Moorestown</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/moblin">Moblin</a>, and now MeeGo, getting back in the mobile conversation is something Intel desperately needs to do.<br />
<br />
Oh, and figuring out how to make ads that don't autoplay audio wouldn't hurt, either.
<div> </div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/">Editorial: Intel keeps pushing MeeGo, but why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19843906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad</category><category>advertising</category><category>editorial</category><category>intel</category><category>maemo</category><category>medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>moblin</category><category>os</category><category>smartphone</category><category>tablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel talks Medfield: will ship in a phone and have the longest usage time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/lead1.jpg" /></a></div>
We had a feeling we'd be hearing about Intel's Atom for smartphones here at Mobile World Congress, and Intel did in fact take the stage today to talk about its forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> processor. The company has announced that it's starting to sample or test its 32nm Medfield processor for mobile devices with its customers (obviously, it's not telling us which ones) and more importantly that it <em>will</em> ship in a phone. <span id="search" style="visibility: visible;">Yep, Intel's Senior Vice President Anand Chandrasekher spoke quite firmly about how the platform will in fact ship in smartphones and that it will also support Android. He pulled out the phone above just as a proof point, and while he didn't say who made it, we have a sneaking suspicion it's that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/">Aava Mobile</a> phone we've heard about. </span><br />
<br />
Chandraskher also took direct aim at ARM (he even called out ARM's CEO Warren East), and hammered home Intel's focus on battery life. He didn't quote an exact run time, but he did say that "on active power we are the most efficient architecture on the planet." We actually believe he repeated that it will have the "longest usage time" at least three times -- we're thinking he's serious. What about standby? He was a bit more vague on that, but did say it would be competitive there as well. We'll be doing our best to track down that Medfield-powered handset up there, so stay tuned. <span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Our friend Chippy from <em>CarryPad</em> caught a bit of <a href="http://www.carrypad.com/2011/02/14/intel-shows-medfield-phone-running-android-at-mwc/">Anand's talk on video</a>. Hit the break for that.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update 2</strong>: We asked <span id="search" style="visibility: visible;">Anand</span> for clarification on the time frame of these Medfield handsets -- he wouldn't detail that exactly, but he did say that the platform will go into production this year. <br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/">Intel at MWC - Medfield preview</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/#3879048"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intelgal1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/#3879049"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intelgal2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/#3879050"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intelgal3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/#3879051"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intelgal4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-at-mwc-medfield-preview/#3879053"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intelgal5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel talks Medfield: will ship in a phone and have the longest usage time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/">Intel talks Medfield: will ship in a phone and have the longest usage time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19842549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aava mobile</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>Anand Chandrasekher</category><category>AnandChandrasekher</category><category>android</category><category>atom</category><category>battery life</category><category>BatteryLife</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>Medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>mwc</category><category>MWC 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>phone</category><category>smartphone</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Aava Mobile reportedly set to reveal Medfield-based Android / MeeGo phone at MWC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/aava-mobile-phones.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Eager for a way to forget about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Moorestown/">Moorestown</a>? We wouldn't be shocked if Intel was in the same camp, and if this here rumor pans out, it could be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> acting as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">amnesia</a> at Mobile World Congress. If you'll recall, Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/">briefly showed off</a> a Medfield-based phone late last month, and now we're hearing that Aava Mobile -- the same company responsible for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/05/aava-mobiles-intel-moorestown-prototype-plays-world-of-warcraft/">WoW-crunching Moorestown demonstration</a> at Computex -- is poised to release a real stunner in Barcelona. <i>Slashgear</i> has it on good authority that Aava's second-generation Core design will be officially rolled out in a matter of days, complete with Intel Inside, an 8.9mm-thick chassis, Android and MeeGo. You read correctly -- <i>both</i> mobile operating systems will be supported. It's said that Aava doesn't actually plan on hawking these to consumers; instead, they'll be shuttled off to developers in order to promote its integrated ACPU and modem platform. Hard to say if the shell we'll (hopefully) see at MWC will remain final, but you can bet we'll be digging for more once the show floor opens.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/">Aava Mobile reportedly set to reveal Medfield-based Android / MeeGo phone at MWC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19827718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aava</category><category>Aava Core</category><category>aava mobile</category><category>AavaCore</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>android</category><category>atom</category><category>intel</category><category>linux</category><category>Medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>mobile world congress</category><category>mobile world congress 2011</category><category>MobileWorldCongress</category><category>MobileWorldCongress2011</category><category>moorestown</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>prototype</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel briefly shows off Medfield-based smartphone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/medfield-phone-01-31-2011.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">promised</a> way back in 2009 that we'd be seeing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a>-based smartphones in 2011, and it looks like those have now gotten one step closer to reality. While there's unfortunately few details to be had, that's apparently a Medfield-based smartphone of some sort in the hand of Intel's <span id="intelliTxt">Anand Chandrasekher above, who apparently showed off the phone (possibly a prototype) ever so briefly at the company's sales and marketing conference last week. Could it be a sign of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/">things to come</a> at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mwc">MWC</a> next month? Maybe, maybe not, but we'll be there to find out.</span></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/">Intel briefly shows off Medfield-based smartphone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19822031/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-briefly-shows-off-medfield-based-smartphone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anand Chandrasekher</category><category>AnandChandrasekher</category><category>atom</category><category>intel</category><category>maemo</category><category>medfield</category><category>prototype</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia N9 to bust loose with MeeGo on Intel Atom power?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x08108h3434tf.jpg" /></a></div>
Nokia has to do something big if it wants to crack the US smartphone market. We can agree on that, right? And believe us, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/15/nokias-vp-of-design-has-a-plan-to-crack-the-us-market-with-meeg/">Nokia wants this</a> -- nothing will make the mighty Finns (and the company's global investors) prouder than to gain some traction in the home of Apple pie and Google desserts. So how will the company do it? With
<meta charset="utf-8">Symbian? Oh, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/19/wsj-nokia-x7-canceled-for-atandt-but-at-espoos-behest/">hell no</a>.
<meta charset="utf-8">By introducing another MeToo handset? Nope, with MeeGo on a rockin' platform like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nokia,n9">rumored N9 slider</a> pictured above. <br />
<br />
Nokia announced its hardware plans for Maemo 6 a long time ago. At that time, the company was clear that it would continue using TI OMAP processors. Much has changed since then, however. In addition to several <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/14/nokia-hires-peter-skillman-former-palm-design-vp-as-meego-user/">key</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/13/nokias-anssi-vanjoki-resigns/">leadership</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/nokias-meego-chief-resigns/">changes</a> including a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/nokias-opk-is-out-replaced-by-stephen-elop-as-president-and-ce/">Canadian-born CEO</a> who spent much of his time working in the US, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/15/meego-nokia-and-intel-merge-maemo-and-moblin/">Nokia has joined Intel</a> to roll up <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/maemo6">Maemo 6</a> and Moblin into MeeGo with Nokia's first <strike>Maemo 6</strike> MeeGo/Harmattan handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/stephen-elop-first-meego-device-is-a-2011-event/">pushed into 2011</a>. Simultaneously, Intel has also been doing its best to show its new Moorestown platform as a powerful ARM alternative, even showing off <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/16/meego-1-1-spotted-running-on-moorestown-hardware-blowing-minds/">MeeGo handsets</a> exploiting a Lincroft SoC and Atom processor core.
<meta charset="utf-8">And Intel has said that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">Medfield-based smartphones</a> (Moorestown's
<meta charset="utf-8">successor) would arrive in the middle of 2011. <br />
<br />
So why the build-up? Well, we've just been tipped to a claim by
<meta charset="utf-8"><em>Prosessori,</em> a respected Finnish technology magazine, <a id="fck_paste_padding">﻿</a>that the Nokia N9 will launch with a 1.2GHz Atom processor. Better yet, it could be unveiled as soon as Mobile World Congress in February, presumably during Stephen Elop's keynote. Do we believe it? Not entirely, but <em>it is possible</em> given the chain of events that have taken place. And you can bet that the first commercially available Intel smartphone with a brand new Nokia user experience would certainly grab headlines in the US and around the world. Something that should translate into high-end market share (and profits) if it's as "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/21/stephen-elop-first-meego-device-is-a-2011-event/">exciting</a>" as Elop claims.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Janne]<br type="_moz" />
</meta>
</meta>
</meta>
</meta>
</meta><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/">Nokia N9 to bust loose with MeeGo on Intel Atom power?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19808228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/nokia-n9-to-bust-loose-with-meego-on-moorestown-power/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>harmattan</category><category>intel</category><category>lincroft</category><category>maemo</category><category>maemo 6</category><category>Maemo6</category><category>medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>moorestown</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>n9</category><category>nokia</category><category>omap</category><category>Prosessori</category><category>rumor</category><category>speculation</category><category>ti</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Otellini says 35 Atom-based tablets coming in 2011, but smartphones get pushed back (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/12-08-10inteltabs.jpg" /></a></div>
It's been a long, hard road for Intel in the mobile space, but it looks like things are about to get brighter: speaking at the Barclay's Capital Global Technology Conference today, CEO Paul Otellini said that some 35 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/moorestown">Moorestown</a> tablets running a mix of Windows, Android, and MeeGo would arrive in 2011. (No wonder the company just <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intel-quietly-forms-netbook-and-tablet-group-to-fend-off-competi/">formed a tablet and netbook division</a>.) What's more, he provided a handy chart showing the OS breakdown by vendor: Toshiba, Dell, Fujitsu are going Windows-only, while Asus and Lenovo are building both Windows and Android products, and Acer's going straight MeeGo. (Remember, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/23/acer-debuts-10-1-inch-windows-7-tablet-amd-powered-inbuilt-3g/">Acer's using AMD</a> in its Windows tablet.) That's pretty much <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">right on schedule</a>, and we'd expect to see several of these at CES, but not all the news is so rosy: Otellini also said that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a>-based smartphones won't arrive until "mid-2011," which is a bit of a delay from the "first half of 2011" we'd <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">been told in June</a>. Sure, it doesn't sound like the end of the world, but ARM-based competitors like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/18/qualcomm-teases-28nm-dual-core-snapdragons-pixel-punching-adren/">Qualcomm</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/tis-omap4440-processor-brings-two-blazing-cortex-a9-cores-to-th/">TI</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/nvidia-touts-the-benefits-of-multi-core-processors-for-smartphon/">NVIDIA</a> continue to push ever farther ahead with multicore designs, and Intel can't very well catch up with delayed parts. Then again, if Intel can really deliver the performance and efficiency it's been promising it might not matter -- we'll see what CES has in store.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">Intel's Otellini says 35 Atom-based tablets coming in 2011, but smartphones get pushed back (again)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19752873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>delay</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>moorestown</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tablets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel making 'important announcement' today --  a Nokia netbook / MID?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=axL1cxJCUAwU"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/nokia-fist-bump-netbook.jpg" /></a></div>
Possible big news on the way later today. According to <em>Bloomberg</em>, Intel's very own Mr. MID, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Anand%20Chandrasekher">Anand Chandrasekher</a>, will announce Nokia as a new customer of its mobile processors. This is important because Nokia is a long time friend of ARM and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/intel-concedes-arms-superiority-over-atom-fake-iphone-crisis-a/">Intel by its own admission</a> can't currently compete with ARM when it comes to the ultra-low power consumption requirements of smartphones. So whatever Nokia's got cooking will presumably be running on Intel's upcoming Moorestown MID platform or its ultra-low power <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">Medfield</a> silicon targeting mainstream smartphones in 2011. On the other hand, Nokia's CEO already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/nokia-working-on-laptops-arm-powered-mid/">expressed interest</a> in entering the laptop race with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/27/nokia-laptop-a-snapdragon-or-atom-based-netbook/">Intel or the ARM-based Snapdragon</a> rumored to be at the core. But if this announcement results in yet another Atom-based netbook, well, good luck with that Nokia.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/06/22/breaking-intel-to-supply-chips-to-nokia.html">IntoMobile</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/">Intel making 'important announcement' today --  a Nokia netbook / MID?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=axL1cxJCUAwU>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19075145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-making-important-announcement-today-a-nokia-netbook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anand Chandrasekher</category><category>AnandChandrasekher</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>medfield</category><category>mid</category><category>moorestown</category><category>netbook</category><category>nokia</category><category>rumor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-medfield-05-17-09.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">We've been hearing about Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> processor for some time now, but much of the talk so far has been about it being an Atom-replacement for netbooks and MIDs. A seemingly recent Intel presentation obtained by the folks at <em>UMPC Portal</em> is now shedding a bit more light on the matter, however, and it's looking like smartphones could actually be at the heart of Intel's long-term plans. As you can see above, and in the complete presentation at the link below, Intel sees its base of devices getting larger and larger as its processors get smaller and more power-efficient, and it looks like "mainstream smartphones" could become a reality as soon as 2011. That's due largely to the 32nm manufacturing process used for the smaller Medfield processor, which also makes uses a smaller board size that leaves more room for keypads, batteries and whatnot. Of course, we are still talking about Intel predicting the state of devices two years out, so who knows how things will shake out in the interim.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handsets/" rel="tag">Handsets</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobile</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/intel-medfield-05-17-09.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">We've been hearing about Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> processor for some time now, but much of the talk so far has been about it being an Atom-replacement for netbooks and MIDs. A seemingly recent Intel presentation obtained by the folks at <em>UMPC Portal</em> is now shedding a bit more light on the matter, however, and it's looking like smartphones could actually be at the heart of Intel's long-term plans. As you can see above, and in the complete presentation at the link below, Intel sees its base of devices getting larger and larger as its processors get smaller and more power-efficient, and it looks like "mainstream smartphones" could become a reality as soon as 2011. That's due largely to the 32nm manufacturing process used for the smaller Medfield processor, which also makes uses a smaller board size that leaves more room for keypads, batteries and whatnot. Of course, we are still talking about Intel predicting the state of devices two years out, so who knows how things will shake out in the interim.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/">Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/05/intel-investor-presentation-highlights-smartphone-push>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1548518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="left"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081209006560&amp;newsLang=en"><img width="228" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="171" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/1intel-chip.jpg" alt="" /></a>In 2005 Intel revealed its 65-nm manufacturing process, then 45-nm in 2007. Today, in keeping with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intels-6-core-dunnington-coming-in-2008-nehalem-official/">"tick-tock" strategy</a>, Intel is announcing a further shrinkage to its manufacturing process as it ends the development phase for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/32nm">32-nm chip circuitry</a>. That puts the chips on a production schedule for Q4 2009 -- interesting as Intel's rumored 32-nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/">Medfield</a> chip wasn't expected until the first half of 2010. According to Intel, the new chips incorporate second-generation <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/7-year-old-gordy-moore-travels-through-time-invents-penryn/">high-k + metal gate technology</a> with transistors that switch 22% faster than its current 45-nm Penryn chips. Why should you care? Well, the smaller chips are cheaper to manufacture which should translate to consumer savings. They also require less power than Intel's notoriously power-friendly Atom-class chips. As an interesting side note, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is reporting that Intel has also disclosed a variant of its 45-nm process (the Lincroft-based <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/">Pineview</a> we presume) "that is tailored to create chips for portable computing devices that require low power consumption." Uh, those wouldn't be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/24/intel-concedes-arms-superiority-over-atom-fake-iphone-crisis-a/">targeting ARM</a> by any chance would they Intel? Wink wink, nudge nudge.<br /></div>
<br />[Via <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122887799734693921.html?mod=MKTW&amp;ru=MKTW">Wall Street Journal</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/">Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081209006560&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1396588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32-nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>arm</category><category>lincroft</category><category>medfield</category><category>mid</category><category>netbook</category><category>pineview</category><category>tick tock</category><category>tick-tock</category><category>TickTock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rumored Intel roadmap names next Atom "Medfield" ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/1intel-chip.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<div align="left">Rumors are swirling about Intel's roadmap of forthcoming netbook and handheld processors, which apparently showed up in a recent report by UBS. The roadmap seems to confirm the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/05/next-generation-atom-processors-for-netbooks-scheduled-for-q3-2/">previously seen Pineview</a>, and codenames its successor "Medfield," which is to be built on 32-nanometer process technology. Pineview, after some speculation, seems to have been nailed down as a 45-nanometer chip, and will be released in 2009, while Medfield, a complete system-on-chip, will follow in 2010. Medfield will have two variants, one for netbooks rumored to use the current <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT">integrated GPU</span>, and one for MIDs, which is said to carry a <span name="intelliTxt" id="intelliTXT"> PowerVR graphics core like the one used in the iPhone. Intel</span> has apparently confirmed the codename "Medfield," but, when questioned, wouldn't answer to allegations that the person who'd come up with the moniker had been fired on grounds of being the least creative namer in the history of naming. <br /></div>
<div align="left"><br />[Via <a href="http://www.techdigest.tv/2008/12/intel_chip_road.html">Tech Digest</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/12/06/medfield-atom">Read</a> - Medfield is the next Atom<br /><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/08/intel_roadmaps_medfield/">Read</a> - Intel's 32 nm Atom roadmapped<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/">Rumored Intel roadmap names next Atom "Medfield" </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1394702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/08/rumored-intel-roadmap-names-next-atom-medfield/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32-nanometer</category><category>atom</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>pinefield</category><category>powervr</category><category>roadmap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
