<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/151104/2010/05/westmereex.html?lsrc=rss_main"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0507m3ubweintel.jpg" /></a></div>
Yeah yeah, "more cores and faster speeds," you've heard it all before right? That'd be our reaction too if we weren't talking about the successor to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Nehalem-Ex</a>, Intel's most gruesomely overpowered chip to date. Launched under the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> branding in March, it represents Intel's single biggest generational leap so far, and with its eight cores, sixteen threads, and 24MB of shared onboard cache, you could probably see why. Time waits for no CPU though, and Intel's planned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/intel-begins-production-of-32nm-westmere-processors/">32nm</a> Westmere-Ex successor will move things forward with an unspecified increase in both core count (speculated to be jumping up to 12) and operating frequencies, while keeping within the same power envelope. Given the current 2.26GHz default speed and 2.66GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turbo+boost">Turbo Boost</a> option of the 7500, that means we're probably looking at a 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz <em>12-core</em>, hyper-threaded processor, scheduled to land at some point next year. Time to make some apps that can use all that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">parallel processing</a> power, nay?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/">Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19468433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>eight-core</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>multicore</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>parallel processing</category><category>ParallelProcessing</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>professional</category><category>roadmap</category><category>servers</category><category>superfast</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere-ex</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel readies 8-core Nehalem-Ex processors for a March launch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Buckle-Up-Intel-Preps-8Core-NehalemEX-Chips-for-March-Launch/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/8mar10nehaleobu23t.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/">current generation</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon">Xeon</a> processors already represents some of the fastest silicon you can buy, and yet the company's forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/">Nehalem-Ex</a>-based Xeons are being touted as the single greatest generational jump in its history. To achieve that, Intel has strapped <em>eight</em> cores into each CPU, with a pair of threads per core and 24MB of shared cache, along with integrated quad-channel memory controllers, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turboboost">Turbo Boost</a>, and the pretty awesome ability to scale up to eight sockets -- meaning you could have 64 processing cores in the same rig. Don't even ask whether these chips can run <em>Crysis 2</em>, they'll probably be showing up in the machines that are <em>making</em> the game... and maybe yours, provided you have the cash to splash later this month.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Intel readies 8-core Nehalem-Ex processors for a March launch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19388364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8-core</category><category>business</category><category>high end</category><category>HighEnd</category><category>hyperthreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>professional</category><category>quad-channel</category><category>servers</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><category>workstation</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's new Nehalem-EX CPUs rock servers with eight cores, 16 threads, infinite sex appeal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Intel-Unveils-NehalemEX-OctalCore-Server-CPU/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="Intel's new Nehalem-EX CPUs rock servers with eight cores, 16 threads, infinite sex appeal" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/nehalem-ex-overview-20090527-600.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
What's that, you have an array of six-core CPUs in your rack? That is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/intel-launches-six-core-xeon-7400-your-bank-account-shudders/">so last year</a>. You're going to feel pretty foolish when all the cool admins start popping eight-core chips up in their closets this fall. That's the number on offer in Intel's latest, the Nehalem-EX. It's an evolution of the architecture that some of you may be spinning in your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/corei7">Core i7</a> machines, but boosted to support up to 16 threads and 24MB of cache. 2.3 billion transistors make the magic happen here, and Intel is pledging a nine-times improvement in memory bandwidth over the Xeon 7400. Chips are set to start hitting sockets sometime later this year, and while nobody's talking prices, staying hip in the enterprise server CPU crowd doesn't come cheap.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/">Intel's new Nehalem-EX CPUs rock servers with eight cores, 16 threads, infinite sex appeal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 27 May 2009 08:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hothardware.com/News/Intel-Unveils-NehalemEX-OctalCore-Server-CPU/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19048931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>16 thread</category><category>16Thread</category><category>8 core</category><category>8Core</category><category>hyper threading</category><category>hyper-threading</category><category>HyperThreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel nehalem-ex</category><category>IntelNehalem-ex</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>server</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:06:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
