<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Apple dings Psystar for $2.67m, round two heads to Florida]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/12-01-09applepsy.jpg" alt="" /></div>
It looks like the first phase of the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/apple,psystar">Apple / Psystar Mac cloning saga</a> is winding towards a conclusion, as the two sides have just filed to wrap up their case with the California court that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/">ruled decisively in favor of Apple last month</a>. As you probably expect, Apple hasn't ceded much ground here: Psystar's agreed to be deemed liable for illegally copying OS X Leopard, bypassing the OS X kernel encryption in violation of the DMCA, and breaching Apple's EULA, all to the tune of $2,675,050. In return, Apple's dropping its various trademark and unfair competition claims, and has promised to hold off on collecting any cash until the various appeals have run their course. Now, considering Apple and Psystar are currently engaged in pretty much the exact same case in Florida over Snow Leopard, we'd say that this agreement isn't much more than a way for both sides to save money and move on to that fight: Apple's already won the bulk of its case against Psystar in California, and spending money to litigate trademark claims <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/apples-lawsuit-against-psystar-examined/">we thought were weak when we first read them</a> doesn't really buy Steve any leverage he doesn't already have, while Psystar probably needs to scrimp all the coin it can.<br /> <br /> There's one other little wrinkle here, and that's exactly what Apple's eventually going to be able to prevent Psystar from doing. It's certain that the California court will bar Psystar from preloading machines with Leopard, but Psystar's arguing that its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/23/psystar-releases-rebel-efi-installer-further-enrages-apple/">Rebel EFI software</a> shouldn't be covered by any decision, since it wasn't part of the case. That's an interesting argument and definitely worth some consideration -- but it's got some holes in it since Psystar's now admitted that it's liable for contributory and induced copyright infringement and violating the DMCA. As <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/">we've said before</a>, Psystar's essentially doing with Rebel EFI what <a href="http://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/">Grokster got smacked by the Supreme Court</a> for doing in 2005: it's trying to build a business around the knowing copyright infringement of customers, and that usually doesn't fly. We'll see what happens -- and Florida awaits.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/">Apple dings Psystar for $2.67m, round two heads to Florida</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19260530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/apple-dings-psystar-for-2-67m-round-two-heads-to-florida/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>cloning</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OS Xbox Pro casemod build video is mesmerizing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.willudesign.com/osxboxproTop.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/11-24-09osxboxpro.jpg" /></a></div>
We've certainly seen plenty of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/osx86">hackintoshes</a> in our time, but Will Urbina's OS Xbox Pro is also one of the cleanest <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/casemod">casemods</a> we've ever seen. Built so that Will can run Final Cut Pro for his job as a video editor, the machine is based on an <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/efix">EFI-X</a> hackintosh dongle, and inside it sports an 2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s paired with an NVIDIA GeForce 9800GT card, 8GB of RAM, an 16GB SSD, and four traditional hard drives: one each to boot Windows 7 and OS X, and two 500GB 7,200rpm drives in a RAID0 array for video editing. Will says his total parts cost was under $1,500 for a system that matches a $4,500 Mac Pro, but that obviously doesn't include the value of his time -- which, judging by the totally captivating build video, should be plenty expensive. Check it below.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>OS Xbox Pro casemod build video is mesmerizing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/">OS Xbox Pro casemod build video is mesmerizing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19252901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/os-xbox-pro-casemod-build-video-is-mesmerizing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>case mod</category><category>casemod</category><category>efi x</category><category>efi-x</category><category>EfiX</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>mod</category><category>modding</category><category>os x</category><category>os xbox pro</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>OsXboxPro</category><category>will urbina</category><category>WillUrbina</category><category>xbox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple wins copyright infringement case against Psystar in California]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><!-- sphereit start --><a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/engadget/files/Psystar-order.pdf"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/7-16-08-apple-psystar.jpg" /></a></div>
Well, well. Apple's won its copyright infringement claim against would-be Mac cloner <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> in California. Anyone surprised? As <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/apples-lawsuit-against-psystar-examined/">we've been saying all along</a>, the key argument wasn't the OS X EULA or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/">Psystar's failed monopoly claims</a>, but pure, simple copyright infringement, since Psystar was illegally copying, modifying, and distributing Apple's code. Psystar was also dinged for circumventing Apple's kernel encryption in violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, but that's just another nail in the coffin, really. There's still some legal fireworks to come, as Apple's various other claims like breach of contract, trademark infringement, and unfair competition weren't addressed in this ruling, but those are all secondary issues now -- and we'd expect this decision to have quite an impact on the other case currently ongoing in Florida. We've broken down the highlights after the break, hit up the read link for the PDF and follow along.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple wins copyright infringement case against Psystar in California</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/" rel="tag">Software</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/">Apple wins copyright infringement case against Psystar in California</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/engadget/files/Psystar-order.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19239839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mac os x</category><category>MacOsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar founders claim they cracked OS X, hackintosh scene is 'all wrong']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2009-11-12/news/miami-boyz-versus-apple-computer&amp;page=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/091023-rebelefi-01.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Okay, so we're reading this puff piece in the <em>Miami New Times</em> about would-be Mac cloner <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a>, and while we're somewhat willing to dismiss author Tim Elfrink's various mischaracterizations of the law and what Psystar is actually doing as just laziness and / or ignorance, there's a quote here from Psystar founder Rudy Pedraza that simply leaps off the page:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>Rudy scoffs at the idea he borrowed from the Hackintosh scene. "The first thing you have to do is unlearn everything you've read online about how to make this work," Rudy says, "because it's all wrong."</div>
</blockquote> Really? Because we think there's a very large, very <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hackintosh">active hacking community</a> out there that would disagree with you, Rudy.<br />
<br />
P.S.- A full list of every other mistake in this piece after the break.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Chris]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Psystar founders claim they cracked OS X, hackintosh scene is 'all wrong'</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/">Psystar founders claim they cracked OS X, hackintosh scene is 'all wrong'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19233644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/11/psystar-founders-claim-they-cracked-os-x-hackintosh-scene-is-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>open computer</category><category>OpenComputer</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>osx86 project</category><category>Osx86Project</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Intel's Light Peak running an HD display while transferring files... on a hackintosh]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/2009-09-24idfd2-3.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel just did a pretty impressive demo of its new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/intel-unveils-light-peak-10gbps-optical-interconnect-for-mobile/">Light Peak optical device interconnect</a>, driving a greater-than-HD display while saturating an SSD RAID all over one cable, but we couldn't help but notice the monster Frankenstein test rig on stage was running OS X -- looks like someone's violating their EULA! Video after the break.<br /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Intel's Light Peak running an HD display while transferring files... on a hackintosh</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/">Video: Intel's Light Peak running an HD display while transferring files... on a hackintosh</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19173068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-intels-light-peak-running-an-hd-display-while-transferri/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>demo</category><category>engadget video</category><category>EngadgetVideo</category><category>featured</category><category>featuredvideo</category><category>features</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2009</category><category>Idf2009</category><category>intel</category><category>light peak</category><category>LightPeak</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[German Mac cloners: "We know our product won't last long"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/23/a-pc-from-wolfsburg-is-a-mac-in-sheeps-clothing/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-06-09pearc2.jpg" /></a>We knew the loophole in German contract law that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/">would-be Mac cloners HyperMegaNet</a> claimed exempted them from the OS X EULA was too good to be true, and it sounds like they do too: in an interview with the <em>New York Times</em>, owner Dirk Bloessl says that although he doesn't "fear Apple," all Cupertino needs to do to shut his PearC machines down is label the Leopard retail box "to be installed only on a Mac" or even just point out that the license is available on the Apple website. Until that happens, Dirk says he'll be selling his hackintoshes to anyone who wants "a fast machine, but does not need a good looking computer," even though he knows "the product does not have a long life time." That's certainly more reasonable than the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/14/psystars-lawyers-regroup-try-another-tactic-against-apple/">increasingly wild-eyed defenses</a> mounted by <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a>, but we've got a feeling Apple's German legal team is going to crack down just as hard.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/">German Mac cloners: "We know our product won't last long"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/23/a-pc-from-wolfsburg-is-a-mac-in-sheeps-clothing/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1470172/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/german-mac-cloners-we-know-our-product-wont-last-long/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>hypermeganet</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>osx86</category><category>pearc</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[German Mac clone company thinks Germany doesn't have laws]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://74.125.95.101/translate_c?hl=en&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/spielzeug/0,1518,605754,00.html&amp;prev=_t&amp;usg=ALkJrhgEt1rv4bjAErJUFffR-WqjcsH0ow"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-06-09pearc2.jpg"  alt="" /></a>We're never going to get tired of the insane legal theories would-be Mac clone companies trot out to try and circumvent incredibly basic copyright and contract law concepts -- like <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> claiming Apple has a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/">monopoly on its own products</a> -- and today we've got German cloners HyperMeganet, who'll sell you a 3.2GHz Core i7 Blu-ray-equipped PearC tower with Mac OS X preinstalled for &euro;2,408 ($3,111). According to the wonderfully-named Hypermeganet, German law requires EULAs to be available for review before purchase, so Apple can't enforce its license restrictions since the Mac OS X EULA isn't printed on the outside of the box. Leaving aside the fact that the OS X installer <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/stevenapryor/1763802375/">displays the EULA on-screen</a> and that you have to click "Agree" before installing, we'd just like to point out that all of Apple's license agreements are available for your leisurely perusal before purchase <a href="http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/">right here</a> -- including the German OS X license, which we're damn sure Apple's foreign counsel has made sure is valid and applicable in that country. Oops. We'll see how long Hypermeganet can keep itself out of trouble -- seriously, when will these companies learn that all they're doing is hurting the homebrew OS X hacking scene by tempting Apple into locking down their systems even harder?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-maker-claims-it-wont-face-psystars-legal-trou/">TUAW</a>]<br /><br /><a href="http://74.125.95.101/translate_c?hl=en&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/spielzeug/0,1518,605754,00.html&amp;prev=_t&amp;usg=ALkJrhgEt1rv4bjAErJUFffR-WqjcsH0ow">Read</a> - Spiegel Online article about PearC<br /><a href="https://pearc.de/">Read</a> - PearC website<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/">German Mac clone company thinks Germany doesn't have laws</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1452842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/german-mac-clone-company-thinks-germany-doesnt-have-laws/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>hypermeganet</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>osx86</category><category>pearc</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iBook G4 benchmarked against hackintosh netbook, comes out even]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.appledifferent.com/?p=234"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-03-09ibook.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apple's been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/21/apple-records-another-record-quarter-1-61b-profit/">pretty resistant</a> to putting out an OS X netbook, and we might have an inkling why -- according to benchmarks run on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/">hackintosh'd</a> MSI Wind variant, Apple's OS runs just about as well on your average 1.6GHz Atom / 1GB RAM machine as it does on a four-year-old iBook G4. Sure, the Atom boots a bit faster and outperforms the G4 on simple tasks, but it slows way down when the going gets tough. Of course, the iBook was a much larger machine than most netbooks out there, but with numbers like this we'd say those of you searching for an OS X netbook can skip the EULA violations and just hunt down an old 12-inch PowerBook G4. Check out all the stats at the read link.<br /><br />[Thanks, Penny]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/">iBook G4 benchmarked against hackintosh netbook, comes out even</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.appledifferent.com/?p=234>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1449442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibook-g4-benchmarked-against-hackintosh-netbook-comes-out-even/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>ibook</category><category>ibook g4</category><category>IbookG4</category><category>netbook</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar's lawyers take another hit, say Apple didn't copyright OS X]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/mac/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212501673"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/7-16-08-apple-psystar.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
It's official -- Psystar's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/psystar-says-it-is-definitely-still-shipping-its-mac-clones/">"hotshot law firm"</a> of Carr and Ferrell is desperate. Their latest brief on behalf of the wannabe Mac clonemaker says that Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/apples-lawsuit-against-psystar-examined/">copyright infringement and DMCA claims</a> against Psystar are invalid because Steve and Co. improperly registered the copyright to OS X. Yes, that's right: Psystar's arguing that the most protective and litigious computer maker on the planet didn't take the time to properly register the copyright to its flagship product. If that sounds insane, it's because it is: we found registrations for every major version of OS X, dating from 2001, in about five seconds of searching. Seriously, if an argument this simple was a winner you'd think we'd have heard about it from the get-go, instead of Psystar's dubious, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/">immediately-dismissed</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/">antitrust claims</a>. We have no idea who's approving or paying for these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/psystar-drops-antitrust-argument-against-apple-throws-copyright/">flailing tactics</a>, but firms like Carr and Ferrell don't risk their reputations on ridiculous arguments like this for free -- maybe there's something to that crazy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/apple-amends-psystar-complaint-says-someones-behind-the-curtai/">"secret backer" conspiracy theory</a> after all.<br /> <br /> [Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/22/psystar_claims_apple_has_invalid_mac_os_x_copyright.html">AppleInsider</a>]<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/mac/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212501673">Read</a> - Psystar claims Apple didn't register the copyright in OS X<br /> <a href="http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=4&amp;ti=1,4&amp;Search_Arg=Mac%20OS%20X%20Leopard&amp;Search_Code=TALL&amp;CNT=25&amp;PID=-H_wcyyigtEZ3UT-QtRpXsTJUefv&amp;SEQ=20081222171112&amp;SID=1">Read</a> - Apple's OS X 10.5 copyright registration<br /> <a href="http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=2&amp;ti=1,2&amp;Search_Arg=mac%20os%20x&amp;Search_Code=TALL&amp;CNT=25&amp;PID=48bsGI18UZf9wHef0qsTSXbS4&amp;SEQ=20081223014733&amp;SID=2">Read</a> - Apple's original OS X copyright registration<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Misc. Gadgets</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/">Psystar's lawyers take another hit, say Apple didn't copyright OS X</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1409447/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/23/psystars-lawyers-take-another-hit-say-apple-didnt-copyright-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Realtek employees leak OS X WiFi drivers for the MSI U100 Wind]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://forums.msiwind.net/mac/great-news-regarding-rtl8187se-wifi-module-t3986-160.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/msi-realtek-wifi-600.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Although not officially posted on its website (yet), Realtek has reportedly been sending out an OS X driver for its RTL8187SE wireless card found in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/u100">MSI's U100 Wind</a>. Various posters at the MSI Wind forums say they were sent the driver from Realtek employees after contacting the company, which invariably led to the drivers being uploaded to RapidShare for everyone to grab. Apparently the card isn't recognized as an Airport device, and forum users are suggesting to instead get the Real WLAN Client Utility. Supposedly, Realtek employees stated (via email) that the driver would be released before December 15, though according to some posters, the company has already missed a November date -- so if you want the driver now, your best bet is to start scavenging the forums.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.gottabemobile.com/2008/12/14/os-x-realtek-wirless-driver-for-msi-wind-released">GottaBeMobile</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/">Realtek employees leak OS X WiFi drivers for the MSI U100 Wind</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://forums.msiwind.net/mac/great-news-regarding-rtl8187se-wifi-module-t3986-160.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1401497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/realtek-employees-leak-os-x-wifi-drivers-for-the-msi-u100-wind/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>driver</category><category>drivers</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>msi</category><category>msi wind</category><category>MsiWind</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>realtek</category><category>u100</category><category>wifi</category><category>wind</category><category>wlan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EFi-X shuts down EFi-X USA, says it doesn't support Mac clones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.efixusa.com/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/efix-06-23-08.jpg" /></a>The Mac cloning soap opera just keeps taking crazy twists and turns -- Art Studios Entertainment, makers of the EFi-X dongle, have shut down <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-decides-to-tempt-apples-lawyers-will-start-shipping-os-x/">EFi-X USA's plans to sell "Millennium" machines</a> capable of running OS X just hours after they were announced. ASE CEO Davide Rutigliano sent us a statement saying that EFi-X USA was misinterpreting ASE's EFi-X certification program, that ASE will "NEVER sell machines or condone the sale of machines that compete with any brand," and that he personally ordered the project abandoned. Indeed, a visit to EFi-X USA's page confirms that the machines have been killed, although we're unsure what the terse statement "EFi-X USA LLC fights the clones and the clonemakers" is supposed to mean. All part of another strange chapter in the Hackintosh saga, we suppose. Check ASE's full statement after the break.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/efix-mac-efi-leopard,6690.html">Tom's Hardware</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EFi-X shuts down EFi-X USA, says it doesn't support Mac clones</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/">EFi-X shuts down EFi-X USA, says it doesn't support Mac clones</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.efixusa.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1399978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/12/efi-x-shuts-down-efi-x-usa-says-it-doesnt-support-mac-clones/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efi x</category><category>efi x usa</category><category>efi-x</category><category>efi-x usa</category><category>Efi-xUsa</category><category>EfiX</category><category>EfiXUsa</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OpeniMac offers cut-rate, aesthetically challenged Apple clones direct from Argentina]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/081204-openimac-02.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<div align="left">After seeing how well Psystar did with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/psystar-open-computer-notes-benchmarks-and-video/">Open Computer</a>, we think we'll just build our own Hackintosh rather than jump into this OpeniMac we've recently been hepped to. But who knows? Maybe you've been dying to send your hard earned money down to some shady Argentinean characters. In that case, this 2.53GHz machine should be right up your alley. Selling for $990 (or $1,330 with an LG 19-inch monitor), the base unit ships with 2GB memory, 320GB storage, and a 256MB ATI Radeon HD PRO. If you've got deep pockets, $1,710 will get you the OpeniMacPRO, a 3.0GHz machine with a 20-inch widescreen monitor and 4GB RAM. But seriously -- who knows where the money goes? And who knows whether you'll ever see the machine? One thing is for certain, however -- this case is as ugly as sin.<br /><br />[Thanks, Santiago]</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/">OpeniMac offers cut-rate, aesthetically challenged Apple clones direct from Argentina</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fopenimac.com.ar%2F&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sl=es&amp;tl=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1391388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/04/openimac-offers-cut-rate-aesthetically-challenged-apple-clones/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple clone</category><category>AppleClone</category><category>clone</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>imac</category><category>mac</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>macintosh</category><category>open computer</category><category>OpenComputer</category><category>OpeniMac</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar's antitrust claims against Apple dismissed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/18/judge_grants_apples_motion_to_dismiss_psystars_counterclaims.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/7-16-08-apple-psystar.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
<br />Well, we can't say we didn't see this coming -- Judge William Alsup in the federal Northern District of California today dismissed Psystar's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/">antitrust counterclaims</a> in Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/apples-lawsuit-against-psystar-examined/">copyright infringement lawsuit</a> against the wannabe Mac cloner. According to the judge, Psystar's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/psystar-says-it-is-definitely-still-shipping-its-mac-clones/">hotshot legal team</a> failed to provide facts "plausibly supporting the counterintuitive claim that Apple's operating system is so unique that it suffers no actual or potential competitors." Not only that, but the judge also found that Psystar actually contradicted itself in pointing out that Apple has to advertise heavily to promote OS X against competing operating systems that perform the same tasks, and that Apple is "certainly entitled" to ask its customers to only use OS X on Apple machines. Yeah, that's a smackdown. Psystar has until December 18th to amend its complaint and try these arguments again, but we can't say we think it's got a shot in hell here -- and something tells us that that court-mandated <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/19/apple-and-psystar-to-settle-things-with-alternative-dispute-reso/">alternative dispute resolution process</a> isn't going to get very far in Psystar's favor either.<br /><br /><em>Disclaimer: Nilay's a lawyer and sells bootleg OSx86 machines out the back of his van, but he's not </em>your<em> lawyer and this isn't legal advice.</em><br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/11/18/judge-dismisses-psystars-anti-trust-counterclaim-against-apple/">Macrumors</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/">Psystar's antitrust claims against Apple dismissed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/18/judge_grants_apples_motion_to_dismiss_psystars_counterclaims.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1376276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/psystars-antitrust-claims-against-apple-dismissed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>copyright</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mac clone</category><category>MacClone</category><category>open computer</category><category>open mac</category><category>OpenComputer</category><category>OpenMac</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell Mini 9 hacked to run OS X]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13519/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-03-08osxmini9.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We're assuming Apple will eventually give up and release a netbook of its own, but until then Steve had better get used to seeing OS X <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/leopard-on-eee-a-match-made-in-heaven/">hacked to run</a> on all manner of tiny laptops -- the latest to make the switch is Dell's Inspiron Mini 9. Nothing too complicated about this hack, since most of the work was already done for the internally-similar MSI Wind, but you'll have to dig up some extra Broadcom drivers to get WiFi and sound working. Seems like a fun little project for the weekend -- anyone going to take the plunge?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/">Dell Mini 9 hacked to run OS X</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13519/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1332275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/dell-mini-9-hacked-to-run-os-x/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>inspiron mini</category><category>inspiron mini 9</category><category>InspironMini</category><category>InspironMini9</category><category>mini 9</category><category>Mini9</category><category>netbook</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OS X-installing EFi-X now shipping for $155]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.efixusa.net/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/efix-06-23-08.jpg"  alt="" /></a>After a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/">few</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/">false starts</a>, the OS X-installing EFi-X dongle is finally shipping to consumers. Currently, two versions are up for grabs: the USB V1 for the average joe / jane and the USB V2 Developers Unit for, well, developers. In short, plugging this gem into your PC will enable select systems to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/">install OS X</a>, but we'd take a hard look at the fine print (and certified systems) before blindly plunking down $155 and hoping for the best.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/09/16/efix-allows-mac-os-x-to-boot-on-a-pc/">MacRumors</a>, thanks Joseph]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/">OS X-installing EFi-X now shipping for $155</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.efixusa.net/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1316732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/17/os-x-installing-efi-x-now-shipping-for-155/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>EFI-X</category><category>efix</category><category>mac</category><category>now shipping</category><category>NowShipping</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>ship</category><category>shipping</category><category>ships</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OS X-installing EFIX device gets unboxed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=125388"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/efix-unboxing.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">While some may have rightly questioned whether the OS X-installing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/efix">EFIX</a> device would ever actually see the light of day, it looks like the Apple irritant is very much real, and now in the hands of at least at two adventuresome InsanelyMac forum members, one of whom thankfully took time to snap a few unboxing pictures. The other member, "np_," went one step further and tested the device with an Asus motherboard and found that it worked "perfectly," despite the fact that EFIX only officially supports Gigabyte boards. Hit up the link below for a few more pics and impressions.<br /><br />[Thanks, Rich]<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/">OS X-installing EFIX device gets unboxed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=125388>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1311713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/11/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-unboxed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efix</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar to countersue Apple for antitrust violations, will ask court to declare Leopard EULA void]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cnet/20080826/tc_cnet/83011357931002603337"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/8-26-08psystar.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Wannabe Mac cloners <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> hired itself some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/14/psystar-says-it-is-definitely-still-shipping-its-mac-clones/">hotshot lawyers</a> to defend against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/16/apples-lawsuit-against-psystar-examined/">Apple's lawsuit</a>, and they're not wasting any time earning their fees -- as Psystar's hinted in the past, it's going to countersue Apple for antitrust violations and ask that the court declare the Leopard EULA void. That's a pretty longshot argument, especially since EULAs have traditionally been upheld in California and Florida and we find it hard to believe a court would find a company with ten percent marketshare to be abusing a monopoly position, but we'll see how everything goes down -- this one is going to have some fireworks for sure.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/">Psystar to countersue Apple for antitrust violations, will ask court to declare Leopard EULA void</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/cnet/20080826/tc_cnet/83011357931002603337>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1296027/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/psystar-to-countersue-apple-for-antitrust-violations-will-ask-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>mac clones</category><category>MacClones</category><category>macintosh</category><category>macintosh clones</category><category>MacintoshClones</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell Studio 17 quickly hacked to run OSx86]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/osx_studio.jpg" /><br /></div>
Usually it's "only a matter of time" before some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/">new-fangled laptop</a> destined for a Windows kind of life up and gets <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OSx86/">OSx86</a> installed on it, but for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Studio17/">Dell Studio</a>, that matter of time was extremely short. Witness a Studio 17 running Leopard out of the box, save for a few <em>minor</em> problems like lack of full video support, sound, WiFi, Bluetooth, and Ethernet. Still, it's pretty encouraging to see the system working at all with such little time and effort put into it. Kind of makes you wish we lived in a super-magical fantasy world where you could run whatever OS you wanted on your laptop, doesn't it?<br /><strong><br />Update:</strong> We had to pull the read link here due to the "Engadget Effect" -- sorry Ken!<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/">Dell Studio 17 quickly hacked to run OSx86</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1270702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/30/dell-studio-17-quickly-hacked-to-run-os-x/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>dell studio</category><category>DellStudio</category><category>hack</category><category>hackintosh</category><category>leopard</category><category>mod</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>studio</category><category>studio 17</category><category>Studio17</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OS X-installing EFiX device gets a price, release date]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.efi-x.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=21&amp;language=english"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/efix-06-23-08.jpg" alt="" /></a>The folks at EFiX don't exactly have the best record of sticking to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/">promised release dates</a>, but the company's CEO and lead engineer, Wilhelm von Vnukov, now tells us that the V2 edition of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/">OSX-installing device</a> for desktop PCs will be available on Monday (July 7th), "I think," with the V1 version set to follow three to four weeks later (still no word on the promised device for laptops). According to the website, the only difference between the two is the addition for support of "several motherboards" on the V2, as well as "experimental support for some prototype motherboards." What's more, the company has also now confirmed that the price for the initial batch will be &euro;80 (or about $125), although availability seems to be confined to Taiwan and Bulgaria at the moment, with a number of other countries (including the United States) listed as being "in negotiation." The company is also promising that the price will be substantially lower once the device enters mass production, although it's unsurprisingly not making any promises as to when that might happen.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/">OS X-installing EFiX device gets a price, release date</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.efi-x.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=21&amp;language=english>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1246410/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/05/os-x-installing-efix-device-gets-a-price-release-date/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efix</category><category>osx</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EFiX OS X-installing USB device now available?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.efi-x.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=23&amp;language=english"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/efix-06-23-08.jpg" alt="" /></a>Well, today's the day that the EFiX folks <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses">promised</a> their magical OS X-installing USB device would be available to the general PC-going public and, judging from the company's website at least, it seems like it's no more readily available than it was yesterday. The company has at least put up a product page for the desktop version of the device (pictured at right), however, as well as some non-working links for promised laptop and PCI versions of the device -- not to mention an intriguing (also non-working) link for "complete systems." They've also helpfully provided a list of compatible hardware, which looks to be extensive enough (assuming it all is, in fact, compatible). Feel free to post in comments if you've actually managed to get an order in one way or another, and we'll be sure to let you know if we hear anything more.<br /><br />[Thanks, Scientist]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/">EFiX OS X-installing USB device now available?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.efi-x.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=23&amp;language=english>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1234198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/23/efix-os-x-installing-usb-device-now-available/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efix</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar puffs out its chest, introduces off-license OS X servers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.psystar.com/press.html"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-20-08-iopenserv.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Apple hasn't sued <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> yet, so it's no surprise the company is pushing the envelope as far as it can -- it's just introduced two rackmount servers that come with OS X Server pre-installed. The OpenServ 1100 and 2400 are both configurable with 2.5 GHz Xeon processors and up to 16GB of RAM, with the 1U 1100 sporting four drive bays and the 2U 2400 rocking six. Just like Psystar's other products, you're on your own (or at the mercy of Psystar) for service and support, since Apple won't help you -- and considering Psystar kept sending us support tickets for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/psystar-open-computer-notes-benchmarks-and-video/">that DHCP issue</a> but never actually called us to resolve it, that might make enterprise customers a bit wary. On the other hand, with prices starting at $1599, we're certain some desperate render shop will take the plunge.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/mac/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208800039&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All">Information Week</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/">Psystar puffs out its chest, introduces off-license OS X servers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.psystar.com/press.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1232328/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/20/psystar-puffs-out-its-chest-introduces-off-license-os-x-servers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>mac cloone</category><category>MacCloone</category><category>openserv 1100</category><category>openserv 2400</category><category>Openserv1100</category><category>Openserv2400</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EFiX wants to bring OSX86 to the masses]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?s=34d6f4e2af7008666c261a3d54626afd&amp;showtopic=110295&amp;st=0&amp;p=781489&amp;#entry781489"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/hackintosh.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Word in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OSX86/">OSX86</a> world is that a new product will revolutionize (and simplify) the process of installing OS X on a PC -- and that product is called the EFiX. The USB dongle allegedly pops into a free port and allows you to install the retail version of the Mac operating system on just about any system by automatically locating the proper hacks and drivers needed. Famed OSX86 hacker <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Netkas/">Netkas</a> has demoed a beta unit on video (which you can see after the break) and claims that it's working as it should. The manufacturer is aiming to have models available for purchase by June 23rd... barring any more "sabotage." This sounds like a much more reasonable solution than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/psystar/">marketing a Mac clone</a> -- feel free to send one our way whenever you like guys.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/06/13/efix-dongle-promises.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EFiX wants to bring OSX86 to the masses</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/">EFiX wants to bring OSX86 to the masses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?s=34d6f4e2af7008666c261a3d54626afd&amp;showtopic=110295&amp;st=0&amp;p=781489&amp;#entry781489>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1225243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/efix-wants-to-bring-osx86-to-the-masses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dongle</category><category>efix</category><category>hack</category><category>mac</category><category>operating systems</category><category>OperatingSystems</category><category>os</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OS X made to run on a Samsung Q1 Ultra Premium]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/04/mac-os-x-on-a-u.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-16-08-q1-x.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
With all the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar-related drama</a> going on in the OSx86 scene this week, it's easy to overlook the fact that people are doing some pretty wild things with the community-led project -- we've already seen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/08/os-x-makes-itself-at-home-on-sony-vaio-ux/">OS X boot on a Sony Vaio UX</a>, and now the crew at jkOnTheRun have managed to shoehorn it on to a Samsung Q1 Ultra Premium UMPC. The Q1's 1.33GHz Core Solo and upgraded 2GB of RAM are enough to run Leopard smoothly, it seems -- Apple sold Mac Minis with similar specs a while back, after all -- and while not everything works exactly right, it appears the digitizer is recognized, allowing Ink to work. It's not perfect, as there are some calibration issues, but it's a fun little peek into what an OS X tablet might look like -- minus the command button, of course.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/">OS X made to run on a Samsung Q1 Ultra Premium</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.jkontherun.com/2008/04/mac-os-x-on-a-u.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1169595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/os-x-made-to-run-on-a-samsung-q1-ultra-premium/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>leopard</category><category>os x</category><category>os x 86</category><category>OsX</category><category>OsX86</category><category>q1</category><category>q1 ultra</category><category>q1 ultra premium</category><category>Q1Ultra</category><category>Q1UltraPremium</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OSx86 Project not too happy with Psystar either]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-16-08-psystar.jpg" alt="" />Uh-oh, it looks like wannabe Mac clone maker <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> has more than one licensing issue with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/">Open Computer</a>: the company didn't get permission from developers working on the OSx86 Project to sell their work. Netkas, who developed the EFI emulator Psystar is using, posted up a blog entry yesterday calling Psystar "liars" and has re-released his code under a license that specifically forbids commercial usage. We chatted briefly with Netkas and he told us that not only did Psystar take his code without permission, it's using other code from the project like the NVInject graphics patch developed by Gotoh, and that he contacted Psystar when he learned about the Open Computer with no results. We also talked to several other members of the OSx86 scene who believe that Apple is tolerant of (and even subtly assisting) their efforts, and are worried that the Psystar flap might end that relationship and bring the hammer down -- after all, there's no Psystar without OSx86.<br /><br />Interestingly, when we called Psystar to get comments on all of this, Rudy Pedraza, the president, first wanted to know if we could make Netkas call him, then denied using the EFI emulator, then repeatedly asked us for Netkas's phone number (in Russia!) so he could talk to him directly, and then finally promised to call us back. Yeah, he never called back. That's a lot of uncertainty around a pair of machines that haven't shipped from a company with two different addresses that's been in business for less than a year -- and Apple hasn't even gotten involved yet. At this point we're going to say that if you really want a hackintosh, you're likely better off rolling up your sleeves and building one yourself -- you'll probably have it done well before this whole mess gets sorted out.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://netkas.org/?p=62">Read</a> - Netkas blog posting<br /> <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/04/15/so_exactly_who_or_what_is_psystar_we_dig_a_little.html">Read</a> - The Guardian "So exactly who or what is Psystar?"<br /><a href="http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&amp;inq_doc_number=P07000077580&amp;inq_came_from=NAMFWD&amp;cor_web_names_seq_number=0000&amp;names_name_ind=N&amp;names_cor_number=&amp;names_name_seq=&amp;names_name_ind=&amp;names_comp_name=PSYSTAR&amp;names_filing_type=">Read</a> - Psystar listing at the Florida State Department website<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/">OSx86 Project not too happy with Psystar either</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1169468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/16/osx86-project-not-too-happy-with-psystar-either/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>efi</category><category>netkas</category><category>open computer</category><category>OpenComputer</category><category>os x</category><category>os x 86</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><category>rudy pedraza</category><category>RudyPedraza</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar says rumors of its demise are greatly exaggerated, still selling Open Computers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.psystar.com/the_community_has_spoken.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/4-15-08-openpro2.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
So the rumors swirling around would-be Mac clone maker <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/psystar">Psystar</a> are getting pretty wild out there -- we've heard everything from "Apple has shut the company down" to "Psystar is going to challenge Apple's EULA in court" in the vacuum following the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/">site meltdown</a> yesterday. That's a big spread, so we hit up Psystar's president Rudy Pedraza for some answers. Rudy was relatively cagey on the phone, refusing to answer any questions about Apple's EULA or copyrights -- or even confirm if Apple has talked with the company -- but he told us that he's got a "team" of people working on an official response and that the Open Computer (and the new quad-core Open Pro, pictured above) are still for sale. What's more, he told us that "a few" orders placed before yesterday's flood of interest have shipped, which means we're curious to see if any of these early adopters actually surface in the next few days. Rudy also told us that Psystar isn't out to infringe any copyrights or trademarks (really?), and that he has no idea how Information Week got a quote from someone named "Robert" indicating that the company was going to challenge Apple's EULA in court. Sure thing. Rudy promised us a machine either today or tomorrow, we'll see what happens -- honestly, it seems like things are chaos at Psystar's HQ in Miami right now.<br /><br />P.S. -Remember <a href="http://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/">MGM v. Grokster</a>? In that case the Supreme Court ruled that a company that based its business around the knowing copyright infringement of customers was still liable, even if it didn't infringe directly. Kinda shoots a hole in the "just don't pre-install Leopard" theory, no?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.psystar.com/the_community_has_spoken.html">Read</a> - Psystar Open Pro<br /><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/04/mac_clone_maker.html">Read</a> - Information Week ("Psystar vows to challenge Apple EULA")<br /><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Apple+Kills+Psystars+399+Mac/article11495.htm">Read</a> - DailyTech: ("Apple Kills Psystar's $399 Mac")<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/">Psystar says rumors of its demise are greatly exaggerated, still selling Open Computers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1168376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/psystar-says-rumors-of-its-demise-are-greatly-exaggerated-still/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>clone</category><category>mac</category><category>open computer</category><category>open mac</category><category>open pro</category><category>OpenComputer</category><category>OpenMac</category><category>OpenPro</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar site goes down under load, Apple lawyers seen shopping for BMWs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.psystar.com/index.php?&amp;page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=flypage_images.tpl&amp;product_id=1&amp;category_id=3&amp;manufacturer_id=4&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=72"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/04/4-14-08-psytar2.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Psystar's offer to build off-license <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/">OSx86 OpenMac clones</a> was apparently pretty popular -- we saw a note from the company saying it was trying hard to cope with the rush of traffic, but it looks like things got overwhelming, and the site is now unavailable. People are speculating that Apple already shut things down, but that's pretty unlikely: nothing on the Psystar site infringed any of Apple's IP (as far as we can recall) and the company hadn't actually sold anything yet, which means there isn't much of anything for Apple to go to court over. On top of that, we doubt that Psystar wasn't expecting to attract Apple's attention, so we don't think a cease and desist letter would scare the company into shutting things completely down. Of course, we're still willing to bet that Apple's legal team is licking their chops in anticipation of something actionable happening, but we'd say the most interesting thing about this so far is the incredible amount of attention a low-cost expandable minitower running OS X has gotten -- maybe someone at Apple apart from the lawyers should be taking notes as well.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> They're back! They've changed the name to "Open Computer," which should totally throw off Apple's lawyers. Or... probably won't.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/">Psystar site goes down under load, Apple lawyers seen shopping for BMWs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.psystar.com/index.php?&amp;page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=flypage_images.tpl&amp;product_id=1&amp;category_id=3&amp;manufacturer_id=4&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=72>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1166777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystar-site-goes-down-under-load-apple-lawyers-seen-shopping-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>clone</category><category>legal</category><category>open mac</category><category>OpenMac</category><category>os x</category><category>os x clone</category><category>OsX</category><category>osx86</category><category>OsXClone</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Psystar's OpenMac Apple clone is close to a Cease and Desist order]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.psystar.com/index.php?&amp;page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=flypage_images.tpl&amp;product_id=1&amp;category_id=3&amp;manufacturer_id=4&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=72"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/psystar-openmac-b-and-w.jpg" /></a><br /></div> If you're not brave enough to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=OSx86">OSx86</a> your own PC, psystar will sell you its OpenMac clone for $400. For that price you get 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo E4500 processor, 2GB of memory, integrated GMA 950 graphics, 250GB disk and 20x DVD burner. Add another $155 and they'll even install Leopard on the non-Apple kit with the help of an EFI V8 emulator. Even at $555 it's still a spec-for-spec bargain compared to the Mac mini (albeit without the mini dimensions). If interested you'd better snap one up quick. Jobs, you'll recall, put a swift end to <em>official</em> Mac-clone licensing when he resumed power at Apple. No reason to think that he (or his lawyers) feel any differently now. <br /><br />[Thanks, <a href="http://robertomateu.com/">Roberto</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/">Psystar's OpenMac Apple clone is close to a Cease and Desist order</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.psystar.com/index.php?&amp;page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=flypage_images.tpl&amp;product_id=1&amp;category_id=3&amp;manufacturer_id=4&amp;option=com_virtuemart&amp;Itemid=72>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1166298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/14/psystars-openmac-clone-is-close-to-a-cease-and-desist-order/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>clone</category><category>efi</category><category>leopard</category><category>mac</category><category>openmac</category><category>osx86</category><category>psystar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
