<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/"><img alt="Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review'" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/evo.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> HTC-branded crates have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/customs-slowly-letting-htc-handsets-into-the-us/">trickling through customs</a> for ten days already, following a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-delayed-at-customs-due-to-itc-exclusio/">total clamp-down</a> earlier in May, but it's only now that they're able to pass through without lengthy extra checks. The manufacturer says it has "completed the review process with US Customs" and that it is "confident that we will soon be able to meet the demand for our products." That obviously raises the question as to why the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/htc-one-x-for-att-review/">HTC One X</a> and<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/htc-evo-4g-lte-for-sprint-review/"> EVO 4G LTE</a> devices were held up in the first place. The ITC had earlier ruled that HTC infringed on an Apple patent about data detection, concerning a handset's ability to recognize and move around personal data, for example between the contact entry and the calendar, and it had given HTC until April to remove that feature. HTC agreed to that, but it appears customs officials initially needed to check every box to ensure that products arriving in the US were of the compliant type. Meanwhile, the LTE part of the EVO 4G is still waiting for its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/fcc-clears-sprint-to-run-cdma-and-4g-lte-on-800mhz/">luggage</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/">Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2012 03:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20247375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>att</category><category>bureaucracy</category><category>customs</category><category>evo 4g lte</category><category>Evo4gLte</category><category>government</category><category>htc</category><category>htc one x</category><category>HtcOneX</category><category>import</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>itc</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>official</category><category>officials</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>red-tape</category><category>regulation</category><category>spring evo 4g lte</category><category>SpringEvo4gLte</category><category>sprint</category><category>sprint evo 4g</category><category>SprintEvo4g</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 03:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/"><img alt="Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/applestylusitisapplied.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 518px; height: 450px;" /></a></p><p> Apple has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/jobs-if-you-see-a-stylus-or-a-task-manager-they-blew-it/">famously shunned</a> the humble <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/capacitive+stylus/">stylus</a>, so it's fair to say we're more than a little curious about why it's filed a patent application for one. The "optical stylus" mentioned seems simple enough. The claims outline the brains to interpret your doodlings, as well pressure and orientation. Beyond that, well, it's more or less just a stylus. While we suspected the team at Cupertino were fans of <em>Draw Something</em>, we didn't think they'd take it this seriously!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/">Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 May 2012 07:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple patent</category><category>apple stylus</category><category>ApplePatent</category><category>AppleStylus</category><category>cupertino</category><category>iphone stylus</category><category>IphoneStylus</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>stylus</category><category>stylus patent</category><category>StylusPatent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung: 'Lawyers didn't design the Galaxy S III']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/"><img alt="Image" height="327" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/afinch.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/">Samsung</a> design VP Chang Dong-hoon has refuted accusations that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview-hands-on/">Galaxy S III</a> was designed "by lawyers." Responding to the reports that stated the new handset was tweaked to circumvent deliberate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/apple-sues-samsung-heres-the-deal/">trade dress claims</a> made by Cupertino in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/18/apple-sues-samsung-over-for-copying-the-iphone-and-ipad/">lawsuit</a>, he said that the redesign is part of the company's five-year plan rather than a sudden change. He went on to say that the flagship went through hundreds of iterations before the team alighted upon the model that will shortly make its way into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/16/galaxy-s-iii-early-release-date/">sweaty palms</a> all over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/amazon-puts-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-up-for-us-pre-orders/">world</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/">Samsung: 'Lawyers didn't design the Galaxy S III'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 22 May 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Apple</category><category>Chang Dong-hoon</category><category>ChangDong-hoon</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Galaxy S III</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>Google</category><category>Lawsuit</category><category>Lawyers</category><category>Litigation</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Patent</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung Galaxy S III</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>Trade Dress</category><category>TradeDress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/"><img alt="Kodak, Apple and RIM go pow" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/kodak-apple-rim.jpg" style="width: 522px; height: 198px;" /></a></p><p> Kodak <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/kodak-chapter-11-bankruptcy/">hasn't caught a break</a> lately, and that trend isn't easing up any time soon with a second rejection arriving in its main International Trade Commission (ITC) patent dispute with Apple and RIM. Despite having <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/02/kodak-granted-reprieve-in-its-itc-battle-with-apple-and-rim/">had its case remanded</a> after a loss last year, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Kodak/">Kodak</a> is once more being told that BlackBerrys and iPhones don't violate a patent on previewing photos. The one violation was rendered moot through "obviousness," according to administrative law judge Thomas Pender. It's still an initial ruling, and Kodak is trying to put a positive light on the situation -- it's "pleased" there's still an infringement, even if the patent claim is invalid -- but the patent wars aren't looking good for a photography company that has already had to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/09/kodak-to-shutter-digital-camera-production-this-year/">give up cameras</a> to have a chance of staying afloat. Most of Kodak's hope, then, will be pinned on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/kodak-files-new-itc-lawsuits-against-apple-and-htc/">second wave of ITC disputes</a> that might stand a better chance of putting at least Apple's feet to the fire.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/">ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 21 May 2012 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>Bankrupt</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>camera</category><category>cameras</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>dispute</category><category>disputes</category><category>imaging</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>iphone</category><category>itc</category><category>Kodak</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>photography</category><category>Research In Motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>RIM</category><category>ruling</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>us international trade commission</category><category>us itc</category><category>UsInternationalTradeCommission</category><category>UsItc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung chief: we're open to a cross-licensing deal with Apple, but 4G chip shortage might last until the fall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/jk-shin-samsung-galaxy-s-iii.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 404px;" /></a></p><p> The at times <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">very heated legal battle</a> between Apple and Samsung might be softening just a bit ahead of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/">truce talks</a> on May 21st. Samsung's mobile head <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/JKShin/">JK Shin</a> just left Seoul for the mediated discussions saying there were still "several negotiation options" on tap, including the possibility of cross-licensing patents. He warned that there was still a "big gap" between the two sides, and we'd tend to agree -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">neither Apple</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/">nor Samsung</a> is exactly backing off just yet. However, it's a definite shift in language from March, when Shin was vowing "no compromise," and it parallels Apple CEO Tim Cook's own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/">disdain for lawsuits</a>. We just wouldn't bet money on the two singing "Kumbaya" this week.</p><p> In same breath, Shin added that an ongoing 4G chipset shortage wasn't letting up: he didn't see things getting better until the start of the fourth quarter, or October for us common folk. That's a problem for Samsung's phones and tablets most of all, of course, and in a dire case could see LTE-packing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-hspa-arriving-in-may-4g-version-hitting-n/">American Galaxy S III variants</a> rely on other vendors' chips to stay on the 4G bandwagon. There's also a chance of a ripple effect on other companies that want Samsung's parts, but short of getting a peek at Samsung's inner workings, we won't know the full impact for awhile yet.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/">Samsung chief: we're open to a cross-licensing deal with Apple, but 4G chip shortage might last until the fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 20 May 2012 13:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20241343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>4G LTE</category><category>4G LTE Chipset</category><category>4gLte</category><category>4gLteChipset</category><category>android</category><category>Apple</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>cross licensing</category><category>cross-licensing</category><category>CrossLicensing</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>galaxy tab</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>GalaxyTab</category><category>ipad</category><category>iphone</category><category>jk shin</category><category>JkShin</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>LTE</category><category>mediation</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patent lawsuit</category><category>patent suit</category><category>PatentLawsuit</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentSuit</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s 3</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>Samsung Galaxy Tab</category><category>SamsungGalaxyS3</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>SamsungGalaxyTab</category><category>settlement</category><category>settlements</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tim cook</category><category>TimCook</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple files (again) for a preliminary ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/"><img alt="Apple's filed for a preliminary injunction (again)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/tab.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> If you found yourself longing for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/20/samsungs-modified-galaxy-tab-10-1n-for-germany-gets-examined/">minor tweaks</a> Samsung made to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GalaxyTab101/">Galaxy Tab 10.1</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/09/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-ipad/">in Germany</a> earlier this year, you may be in luck: Apple's filed for a preliminary injunction against the slate stateside. It isn't the first one, either, Cupertino filed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">something similar</a> back in February, though it didn't quite pass legal muster. After gaining some headway <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">earlier this week</a>, Cook's crew is in for round two, according to <span style="font-style: italic;">FOSS </span><em>Patents</em>, asking for Judge Koh to rule in their favor without a new hearing. Concerned consumers, however, can sidestep the whole mess by simply opting for an injunction-exempt <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-review/">Galaxy Tab 2</a>. Details and speculation can be found at the source link below, just in case you aren't already sick to death of the whole <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2C+samsung%2C+lawsuit">Samsung / Apple</a> spat.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/">Apple files (again) for a preliminary ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 May 2012 02:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20241078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appeal</category><category>appeals</category><category>appeals court</category><category>AppealsCourt</category><category>apple</category><category>cafc</category><category>federal court</category><category>FederalCourt</category><category>Galaxy Tab 10.1</category><category>GalaxyTab10.1</category><category>injunction</category><category>ipad</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>pr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple, HTC ordered by judge to sit down, try and make nice on August 28th]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/"><img alt="HTC's Cher Wang at Apple Store" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x05231eddrgh.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> There's a trend starting to emerge of judges wanting Apple to<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/"> talk settlements with others</a> rather than duke it out in the courtroom. Just two weeks after Apple and Samsung were steered towards talking about a potential deal, a Delaware court has ordered Apple and HTC to meet on August 28th in the hopes that they could shake hands and put an end to an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/16/htc-drags-on-the-patent-war-files-yet-another-complaint-against/">increasingly hectic legal battle</a> under the eyes of a mediating judge. Whether or not that happens is very much up in the air. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said he's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/">not a fan of lawsuits</a>, but he hasn't showed indications that he would take legal action off the table just yet. Likewise, HTC is no doubt eager to eliminate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-delayed-at-customs-due-to-itc-exclusio/">phone shipping delays</a> stemming from Apple's court wins, but the lack of immediate pressure and the hopes of winning countersuits might lead it to hold off. Still, if the court's ideal vision of the world comes to pass, you could see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/23/caption-contest-htc-chairwoman-cher-wang-drops-by-apples-palo/">HTC's Cher Wang shopping in an Apple Store</a> without staff giving her the evil eye.</p><p> [Image credit: <a href="http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=563&amp;t=2168501">mobile01</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/">Apple, HTC ordered by judge to sit down, try and make nice on August 28th</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 May 2012 16:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20240334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>android</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>court</category><category>courtroom</category><category>deal</category><category>deals</category><category>htc</category><category>iphone</category><category>judge</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>mediation</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>negotiation</category><category>negotiations</category><category>patent</category><category>Patent Dispute</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>settlement</category><category>settlements</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>talks</category><category>truce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/"><img alt="Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/tab.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> We'll forgive you if you've forgotten, given the myriad <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2C+samsung%2C+lawsuit">Apple/Samsung</a> legal shenanigans, but back in February, Apple attempted to obtain a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">preliminary injunction</a> against Samsung to prevent the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and a few phones from being sold in the US. Samsung emerged victorious, as the district court denied Cupertino's request because it questioned the validity of a couple of Apple's patents and didn't see how Apple would be irreparably harmed if it failed to get Sammy's products banned. Naturally, Tim Cook's crew appealed that decision, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has decided to give Apple another crack at obtaining an injunction. The CAFC upheld the lower court's ruling as to three of the four patents, but found fault with the District Court's holding that Apple's tablet design patent had substantial questions of validity.</p><p> Essentially, the lower court held that Apple's patent was likely no good because it was an obvious design in light of two tablets that were created long before Apple patented the iPad's look. However, the CAFC found that one of the previous slate's asymmetrical bezel and lack of an unbroken, all-glass surface (among other differences) were sufficient to render Apple's patent non-obvious. Basically, the appellate court found that the District court "construed the claimed design too broadly," and remanded the issue so that the district court could complete its preliminary injunction analysis. So, Apple's cleared a big hurdle towards getting the Galaxy Tab 10.1 off the US market, but the company's still got to persuade <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/">Judge Koh</a> that it'll be irreparably harmed without the injunction. This decision assures even longer legal proceedings, but given how well both of these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/apple-samsung-99-percent-profits/">tech titans</a> are doing these days, we're pretty sure they can afford the attorneys' fees.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 May 2012 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appeal</category><category>appeals</category><category>appeals court</category><category>AppealsCourt</category><category>apple</category><category>cafc</category><category>federal court</category><category>FederalCourt</category><category>galaxy tab 10.1</category><category>GalaxyTab10.1</category><category>injunction</category><category>ipad</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>preliminary injunction</category><category>PreliminaryInjunction</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-samsung-reduce-patent-claims/"><img alt="Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2782479341398995911813501433279534807839n.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 398px;" /></a></p><p> Last week, Judge Lucy Koh informed Apple and Samsung that they would have to reduce the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">number of patent claims</a> at issue in the parties' Northern District of California litigation. And now, each has complied, with Samsung dropping its total number of asserted patent claims from 75 to 15, while dismissing two patents from the case altogether. For its part, Apple has reduced its case to one claim from each of its asserted utility patents, its four iPhone and one iPad design patents, and its trade dress claims for those two devices. Keep in mind, however, that they did so without prejudice, which means that either party can reassert these dismissed claims in a later lawsuit. That said, the parties have at least attempted to placate Judge Koh in order to keep their July 30th trial date, which is when the real legal fireworks begin. Feel free to check the filings below for the full scope of this most recent patent pruning.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/">Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 May 2012 13:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20233937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>claims</category><category>infringement</category><category>judge lucy koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent claims</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentClaims</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Patent application highlights Apple's continued flirtation with haptic feedback]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/"><img alt="Image" height="289" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/apple-haptic-patent-5-12.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="547" /></a></p><p> We could all use a little feedback, right? Even Apple. The company has been toying around with the concept of haptic feedback for a while now, at least so far as patent applications are concerned. Another application filed in November or 2010 has surfaced. Of course, what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/02/apple-patent-applications-offer-glimpses-of-haptic-screens-rfid/">we told you back in 2009</a> about the tenuous connection between an application and an actual product is as relevant as ever. Still, Apple's concept for a "tiered haptic system" which "may use one or more arrays of shape change elements to provide a wide range of tactile feedback" demonstrates that, at least as of late 2010, Cupertino was still working to rethink the way it sees touchscreens.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/">Patent application highlights Apple's continued flirtation with haptic feedback</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 May 2012 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>haptic</category><category>haptic feedback</category><category>HapticFeedback</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>touch</category><category>touchscreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Heater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple v. Samsung judge yells 'get to the point, you two']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/stopinthenameofapple-1323372041.jpg" style="margin: 4px 10px; width: 156px; height: 200px; float: right;" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Judge+Lucy+Koh/">Judge Lucy Koh</a>, presiding over the courtroom battle 'twixt <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">Apple and Samsung</a> has ordered that both companies slim down the bundle of litigation so its easy for juries to understand. The docket currently contains <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/">16 patent violations</a>, six trademark issues, five "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/did-apple-alter-photos-of-the-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-in-its-inj/">trade dress</a>" claims and an antitrust matter -- which her Honor Judge Koh described as a "cruel and unusual punishment" for a jury. If both companies can't get <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/apple-and-samsung-ceos-set-to-sit-down-attempt-to-settle-disput/">over a table</a> and produce a Cliffs Notes edition of their global patent battle, then she'll postpone the trial date until 2013.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/">Apple v. Samsung judge yells 'get to the point, you two'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 May 2012 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20229964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Antitrust</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple V. Samsung</category><category>AppleV.Samsung</category><category>Courtroom</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Lucy Koh</category><category>LucyKoh</category><category>Northern District of California</category><category>NorthernDistrictOfCalifornia</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Patents</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung v. Apple</category><category>SamsungV.Apple</category><category>Trade Dress</category><category>TradeDress</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Trademark Litigation</category><category>TrademarkLitigation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 10:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple patents that moment when you text-bomb everyone with your new number]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/"><img alt="Image" height="425" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/applepatent-1335878248.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="519" /></a></p><p> So, you've changed your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/10/google-voice-lets-you-change-your-digits-keep-the-old-ones-for/">phone number</a> to escape that stalker (look, we're <em>sorry</em>, we just wanted to sell you a pyramid scheme), but how do you let all 104 of your remaining friends know without manually texting 'em? The answer lies in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/">Apple's newly granted patent</a>, which aims to end the tedium by having your device recognize when your number switches and automatically send an updated contact entry to everyone in your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/iphone-address-book-issue-prompts-response-apple-access-to-cont/">address book</a>. Of course, there's nothing in the claims to say it's discriminatory, so now we've got your number again -- have you changed your mind about that pyramid scheme?</p><p></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/">Apple patents that moment when you text-bomb everyone with your new number</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 May 2012 18:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20228023/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/apple-contact-updating-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Address Book</category><category>AddressBook</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple Patent</category><category>ApplePatent</category><category>Automatic SMS</category><category>Automatic Texting</category><category>Automatic Updating</category><category>AutomaticSms</category><category>AutomaticTexting</category><category>AutomaticUpdating</category><category>Cellphone Number</category><category>CellphoneNumber</category><category>Contact Information Updating via SMS</category><category>Contact Number</category><category>ContactInformationUpdatingViaSms</category><category>ContactNumber</category><category>Granted Patent</category><category>GrantedPatent</category><category>Patent</category><category>Text Messaging</category><category>TextMessaging</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple and Samsung set to meet May 21st, hug it out over 48 hours]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/"><img alt="Apple and Samsung set to meet May 21st, hug it out over 48 hours" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/apple-samsung-pic-1335654076.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 380px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> These two brawlers were <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/apple-and-samsung-ceos-set-to-sit-down-attempt-to-settle-disput/">given until July </a>to come together and mediate over their numerous globe-spanning <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,samsung">patent lawsuits</a>, but it appears neither side needs to wait that long. According to <em>Foss Patents</em>, May 21st and 22nd have been circled on the calendar of a certain San Francisco courthouse, where Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero will attempt to arbitrate in a calm, soothing voice for two days straight. Presenting himself as a confidant who sits outside of the main litigation being conducted in San Jose, Spero has already asked both parties to open up and provide "candid" statements about the strengths and weaknesses of their own cases, as a first step towards identifying areas of compromise. Fortunately, he still has a few weeks in which to devise further cunning plans.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple and Samsung set to meet May 21st, hug it out over 48 hours</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/">Apple and Samsung set to meet May 21st, hug it out over 48 hours</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20226624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>compromise</category><category>court</category><category>courthouse</category><category>cunning plan</category><category>CunningPlan</category><category>Joseph C. Spero</category><category>JosephC.Spero</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>litigation</category><category>mediation</category><category>minipost</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>negotiation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent battle</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>patent litigation</category><category>PatentBattle</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>patents</category><category>samsung</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tim Cook hates litigation, not quite ready to call a patent truce]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/"><img alt="Tim Cook hates litigation, not quite ready to call a patent truce" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/tim-cook-iphone-4s-live-video.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 339px; border: 0px solid; margin: 4px; " /></a></p><p> Tired of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/">ongoing</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/">patent</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/">wars</a>? Well, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/timcook">Tim Cook</a> gave us some reason to hope. In response to a question about the potential for settlements in the current pile of lawsuits on the company's plate, the CEO seemed open to the idea. In fact, he used the "h" word to describe is feelings towards the process. "I've always hated litigation. I continue to hate it," he said, before striking a slightly more combative tone to clarify, "I just want people to invent their own stuff." So there you go, stop stealing Apple's inventions and its lawyers won't sue. Seems simple enough. The urge to avoid further legal tussles seems genuine though, saying that, if an acceptable agreement could be struck he'd "highly prefer to settle rather than battle."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/">Tim Cook hates litigation, not quite ready to call a patent truce</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20223355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings call</category><category>EarningsCall</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>Patent Dispute</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>patents</category><category>settlement</category><category>tim cook</category><category>TimCook</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ITC judge finds Apple in violation of Motorola WiFi patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/2011-10-18-dsc02554.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> Motorola scored a win with the US International Trade Commission this week in its on-going patent battle <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,motorola/">with Apple</a>. The commission's Judge Thomas Pender ruled that Cupertino is in violation of a Motorola WiFi patent -- one of four patents included in a complaint filed by the RAZR maker back in October 2010. Before the ITC actually goes so far as blocking the import of Apple products, however, the ruling is subject to review by the commission. The decision follows another patent win for Motorola, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/23/itc-issues-preliminary-ruling-in-microsoft-motorola-dispute/">handed down by the ITC</a> yesterday in a dispute with Microsoft.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> Motorola sent along the following, not surprisingly chipper statement on the matter:</p><blockquote> <p>  <span>We are pleased that the ALJ's initial determination finds Apple to be in violation of<span>  </span>Motorola Mobility's intellectual property, and look forward to the full commission's ruling in August. <span> </span>Our commitment to innovation is a primary reason why we are an industry-leader in intellectual property, and our focus continues to be on building on this strong foundation to enhance the user experience.</span></p></blockquote><p></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/">ITC judge finds Apple in violation of Motorola WiFi patent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20223063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/itc-judge-finds-apple-in-violation-of-motorola-wifi-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>dispute</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>itc</category><category>judge</category><category>motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>ruling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Heater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung brings another eight patents to the Apple knife-fight]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/"><img alt="Image" height="380" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/apple-samsung-pic.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> <em>The Mamas and the Papas</em> used to dream about it, but California's been turned from sunny idyll into blood-spattered battleground as the global conflict 'twixt <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">Samsung and Apple</a> continues. Samsung's pulled out a further eight patents to rebuke Apple's Northern District court <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">injunction</a> that's got designs on banishing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/16/verizon-galaxy-nexus-review/">Galaxy Nexus</a> from our shores. Two of the patents are licensed under <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/apple-etsi-frand-licensing-policy/">FRAND</a> terms, muddying the waters even further over the contentious subject of common patent sharing. Meanwhile, both company CEOs are being made to engage in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/apple-and-samsung-ceos-set-to-sit-down-attempt-to-settle-disput/">sit-down talks</a> with the hope that Judge Lucy Koh won't make them share a dorm room at summer camp.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/">Samsung brings another eight patents to the Apple knife-fight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20219305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>California</category><category>California Northern District</category><category>CaliforniaNorthernDistrict</category><category>FRAND</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Lucy Koh</category><category>LucyKoh</category><category>Northern District California</category><category>NorthernDistrictCalifornia</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung v Apple</category><category>SamsungVApple</category><category>Standards Essential Patents</category><category>StandardsEssentialPatents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[German court upholds ban on iCloud and MobileMe push emails]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/"><img alt="German court upholds ban on iCloud and MobileMe push emails" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/icloud.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 243px;" /></a></div>It's been well over a month now since Apple <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/24/icloud-and-mobileme-email-down-in-germany/">suspended push email</a> from its iCloud and MobileMe services, and it doesn't look like it will be switching them back on any time soon. According to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, a German regional court has backed the ban, upholding Motorola Mobility's claims of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/motorola-wins-permanent-injunction-against-apples-icloud-in-ger/">patent infringements</a>. The court agreed that Apple must also pay damages to Motorola, but has yet to agree on an amount. So, for now, users will need to stick to manually fetching updates, and hope a final agreement can be met further down the line.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/">German court upholds ban on iCloud and MobileMe push emails</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20214962/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/german-court-upholds-ban-on-icloud-and-mobileme-push-emails/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>cloud</category><category>court</category><category>german</category><category>germany</category><category>icloud</category><category>injunction</category><category>judge</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>mannheim regional court</category><category>MannheimRegionalCourt</category><category>motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>storage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple patent app details 'active packaging,' a new level of window shopping]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/"><img alt="apple active media packaging" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/apple-media-packaging.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 394px; height: 465px;" /></a></div>Apple's generally not one to go overboard with packaging; a simple white box with a few unmistakable logos is just about all it takes to get the point across. But in a future world -- one where people have digitized skin and NFC readers in their fingernails -- we'll obviously need something with a bit more... flamboyance. A patent application originally filed on December 12th, 2011 (and just made public today) details an "active electronic media device packaging," which outlines a method for packaging gizmos in a box that "may include one or more electrical traces in-molded or printed onto the packaging."<br /><br />It gets a little ambiguous from there, but it sounds as if "one or more wireless power techniques" may be tapped into in order to keep marketing material humming when folks walk by. Speaking of which, the app also explains that POM sensors could be used to "detect various movements events," potentially activating as prospective consumers stroll by. To reiterate, an <i>application</i> for a patent doesn't mean that any of this stuff will get close to coming to fruition, but if you'd like to make absolutely sure you don't live in a world where products call to you from the shelves, we heard Sir Richard Branson can <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/23/first-commercial-spaceport-christens-inaugural-runway-in-new-mex/">assist</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/">Apple patent app details 'active packaging,' a new level of window shopping</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20209411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/apple-patent-app-active-media-packaging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>data</category><category>marketing</category><category>media device</category><category>MediaDevice</category><category>packaging</category><category>patent</category><category>patent app</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApp</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>power</category><category>promotion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola now officially being investigated for abusing its patents in Europe]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/"><img alt="Motorola now officially being investigated for abusing its patents in Europe" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/ec-logo-good.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 165px; float: right; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a>Both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/">Apple</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/">Microsoft</a> have formally complained about Motorola's alleged abuse of "standards-essential" patents, and today the European Commission has been equally formal in starting an antitrust investigation into their claims. In fact, there'll be two separate investigations -- one to discover whether Motorola Mobility failed to honor its <a href="www.engadget.co/tag/frand">FRAND</a> obligations when it sought injunctions against the sale of Apple and Microsoft products, and the other to assess whether Motorola has been unfair in the way it has offered to license its standard-essential patents. The authorities have given no clue as to how long this process could take, or what kind of punishments could be meted out at the end of it, but the (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/google-gets-eu-approval-for-its-purchase-of-motorola-mobility/">almost</a>) Google-owned company is now certainly in for some tumult.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motorola now officially being investigated for abusing its patents in Europe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/">Motorola now officially being investigated for abusing its patents in Europe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20207234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>apple</category><category>ec</category><category>europe</category><category>european commission</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>FRAND</category><category>licensing</category><category>microsoft</category><category>Motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>standards-essential</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nano-SIM standard vote postponed while RIM accuses Apple of cheating]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/nano-sim-1333095021.jpg" style="margin:4px" /></a></div><div> French newspaper <em>Les &Eacute;chos</em> is reporting that the key <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/apple-etsi-frand-licensing-policy/">ETSI</a> vote to determine whose <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/21/apple-nano-sim-motorola-nokia-rim-standard/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter">nano-SIM </a>patent should become the standard has been postponed. The participating companies have failed to reach agreement after Nokia refused to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/">license key patents</a> to Apple in exchange for free use of Apple's technology. As a consequence, the vote will be postponed for a minimum of thirty days.<br /> <br /> Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/rim-ceo-thorsten-heins-laying-off-executives-earnings-report/">RIM</a> has followed &Eacute;mile Zola's example and screamed <em>J'Accuse!</em> at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-and-foxconn-agree-to-drastically-improve-working-condition/">Apple</a>, claiming that Cupertino is trying to rig ETSI's decision by registering its own personnel as representatives from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bell%20mobility/">Bell Mobility</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SKTelecom/">SK Telekom</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/koreas-largest-isp-plans-network-fees-for-datahogs-like-youtu/">KT Corp</a>. The BlackBerry maker has petitioned the standards agency to ensure that proxy voting is not allowed, in an effort to blunt Apple's alleged plan. You can read the full text of RIM's filing after the break.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nano-SIM standard vote postponed while RIM accuses Apple of cheating</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/">Nano-SIM standard vote postponed while RIM accuses Apple of cheating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20204611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>Business</category><category>ETSI</category><category>Europe</category><category>iPhone</category><category>Lumia</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>nano-SIM</category><category>nano-SIM Card</category><category>Nano-simCard</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Standard</category><category>PatentStandard</category><category>RIM</category><category>Standard</category><category>Standards</category><category>Vote</category><category>Vote Rigging</category><category>VoteRigging</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple patents Siri-like system for controlling cameras, PMPs through a computer or smartphone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/2012-03-29-siripatent.png" style="margin:4px" /></a></div>"Siri, turn on the flash and take three pictures with my camera after waiting two seconds." Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/siri/">intelligent voice control system</a> has been wildly popular amongst consumers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/apple-brings-siri-voice-control-to-iphone/">in the U.S.</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/apple-siri-japanese-iOS%205.1/">and abroad</a>, but Siri could be making her way to other devices in the future, including iPods, cameras and other consumer electronics. "Okay, Rock God, I will take your picture in two, one..." A patent by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> filed in 2010 but published today describes a scenario in which you could control a secondary electronic device using your voice, with all of the backend processing passing through a connected smartphone or computer. According to the patent:<br /><blockquote> <p>  One embodiment may include a first electronic device communicatively coupled to a server and to a second electronic device. The second electronic device may be a portable electronic device, such as a digital media player, that includes a voice user interface. The second electronic device may be capable of accurate speech recognition, but may not include additional computation hardware and/or software for training the speech recognition engine. As such, the bulk, weigh, and cost for manufacturing the second electronic device may be reduced, resulting in a more portable and affordable product.</p></blockquote>In other words, you could have Siri-like control of virtually any device, with all of the required hardware and software residing on an iPhone or MacBook, linked with other devices over WiFi or Bluetooth. Voice control wouldn't be practical in all situations, but it could be enormously helpful for certain operations, like adjusting settings or reviewing images. Instead of scrolling through hundreds of images, you could simply say "Siri, show me pictures from last Thursday," and see exactly the shots you were searching for. As always, this is one of thousands of Apple patents, and it quite possibly may never come to fruition as described. But here's to hoping it will. "Siri, show our readers the patent application" -- you'll find it at the source link below.<br /><br /><strong>Update: </strong>Well, it looks like we missed the mark a little bit here, as this is a patent application, not a granted patent. It's for a voice control system where a device receives voice commands and turns them into text using a speech-recognition algorithm received from a remote server -- which sounds an awful lot like Siri.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/">Apple patents Siri-like system for controlling cameras, PMPs through a computer or smartphone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20203922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/29/apple-patents-siri-like-system-for-cameras-pmps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple patent</category><category>ApplePatent</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>patent office</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>PatentOffice</category><category>siri</category><category>software</category><category>us patent</category><category>us patent and trademark office</category><category>UsPatent</category><category>UsPatentAndTrademarkOffice</category><category>USPTO</category><category>voice command</category><category>voice commands</category><category>voice control</category><category>voice controls</category><category>VoiceCommand</category><category>VoiceCommands</category><category>VoiceControl</category><category>VoiceControls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple secures patent on multiple-arm, multiple-frequency antenna design]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/apple-antenna-patent.jpg" style="margin: 12px; float: left;" /></a>If not for Leap Day, Apple would've seen this one granted a year to the day after it was filed; as it stands, 365 days will just have to do. At any rate, Apple has not only managed to secure a patent this fine morning for an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/">ejectable SIM tray</a>, but also one for an antenna isolation apparatus. In simple(ish) terms, the patent details an antenna structure in a portable electronic device that's comprised of "first, second, and third resonating elements aligned along a common axis parallel to a ground plane," with a multiple-arm, multiple-frequency design taking shape. It's also pretty clear that the intention here is to reduce radio-frequency interference between the antennas -- something that'll prove increasingly important as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/carriers-testing-lte-enabled-4g-iphone/">wave support is added</a> in future iPhones. Unfortunately, there's no word on whether this patent will allow AT&amp;T-infused iPhone 5 handsets to display "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/ios-5-1-4g-indicator-att-iphone/">7G</a>" in the indicator bar.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/">Apple secures patent on multiple-arm, multiple-frequency antenna design</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20201850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-multiple-arm-multiple-frequency-antenna-design/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antenna</category><category>antennagate</category><category>apple</category><category>calling</category><category>communication</category><category>dual antenna</category><category>DualAntenna</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>reception</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple patents ejectable SIM card tray as nano-SIM battle rages on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/apple-sim-card-patent.jpg" style="margin:4px" /></a></div>We're guessing it's just coincidental timing here, but it looks as if Apple has been granted a patent surrounding "ejectable component assemblies" that are designed to be "flush with the external surfaces of the housings of the devices, despite variations in their manufacture." In other words, a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/how-to-resize-your-sim-and-drink-the-sweet-nectar-of-mobile-fre/">SIM card tray</a>. Granted, there's no specific verbiage in the independent claims of this one letting us know what exact <i>size</i> we're talking about, so it's highly unlikely that a patent application filed in December of 2010 (but granted today) would be directly referencing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/">nano-SIM war</a> that's currently ongoing. That said, the description most certainly sounds like the tray that we've seen throughout the iPhone's life cycle, and if Apple's trying to go small in future handsets, there's a better than average chance that the ejection mechanism will be all too familiar. Legalese lovers can find the usual load down in the source link.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/">Apple patents ejectable SIM card tray as nano-SIM battle rages on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20201779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/apple-patent-ejectable-sim-card-tray-nano-sim-war/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>nano sim</category><category>nano-sim</category><category>NanoSim</category><category>patent</category><category>sim</category><category>sim card</category><category>sim tray</category><category>SimCard</category><category>SimTray</category><category>tray</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple ready to license its nano-SIM design for free, on one not-so-nano condition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/"><img alt="Apple ready to license its nano-SIM design for free" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/nanosim2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; float: right;" /></a>If you hadn't heard, there are two rival nano-SIM designs going around, but there's only room for one of them to become an industry standard. Nokia, Motorola and RIM sit together in one corner, and we've already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/nokia-apple-nano-sim/">covered</a> why they think their design is superior. On the other side of the ring sits Apple, which has its own tactics for bringing ETSI, the European Telecoms Standards Institute, over to its way of thinking. According to a legal letter shown to<em> FOSS Patents</em> by a "perfectly reliable source", Apple is prepared to license its nano-SIM design royalty-free, so long as it becomes the new standard and all other nano-SIM patent holders reciprocate the gesture. Such a gambit may not appease Cupertino's rivals and it certainly doesn't address their technical concerns, but it might show that Apple isn't looking to profit out of this particular format war and is simply continuing its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/apple-etsi-frand-licensing-policy/">quest</a> for greater clarity on FRAND licensing terms. Then again, it could all just be lawyer-speak.<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong>: Nokia has responded to Apple's move, making it clear that it still prefers its own design. Mark Durrant, director of communications for the Finnish firm said, "the principal issues remain the technical superiority of our proposal and that Apple's proposal does not meet the pre-agreed ETSI requirements... Apple's proposal for royalty free licensing seems no more than an attempt to devalue the intellectual property of others." We expect this to go back and forth a few more times.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/">Apple ready to license its nano-SIM design for free, on one not-so-nano condition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20200747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>design</category><category>ETSI</category><category>European Telecommunications Standards Institute</category><category>EuropeanTelecommunicationsStandardsInstitute</category><category>foss patents</category><category>FossPatents</category><category>industry standard</category><category>IndustryStandard</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>motorola</category><category>nano sim</category><category>nano-SIM</category><category>NanoSim</category><category>nokia</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>rim</category><category>royalty</category><category>royalty-free</category><category>SIM</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple patent app portends gadgets made of glass]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/appleglass.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Thought all those <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-drop-test-yields-results-video/">shattered screens</a> and iPhone 4 backplates would push Apple towards making mobile devices machined from aluminum like its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/25/macbook-air-review-mid-2011/">laptops</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-ipad-review-2012/">tablets</a>? Think again, friends, because a newly published patent application from Cupertino indicates the company is considering crafting portable computing devices out of glass. The app claims a "substantially seamless enclosure . . . extruded in its entirety with glass material" so that wireless signals can freely flow to and fro, along with a method for manufacturing such a device. Naturally, this is only an application, and it doesn't say exactly what kind of super-durable glass would make this a desirous design change. So, who knows if we'll ever see an all-glass exterior on an iPhone or iPod, but you can get a more in-depth peek at that potential future at the source link below. You can also get a glance at what'll be Android's new anthem should that glass-filled future come to pass after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple patent app portends gadgets made of glass</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/">Apple patent app portends gadgets made of glass</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20199171/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/22/apple-patent-application-for-gadgets-made-of-glass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>glass</category><category>iphone 4</category><category>Iphone4</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>uspto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple snags a patent for the Smart Cover's magnetic know-how]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/apple-smart-cover-patent.png" style="margin:4px" /></a></div><div> No, it doesn't cover the totality of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,smartcover">Smart Cover</a> itself (or any case that folds into a triangle), but Apple has now managed to obtain a patent for one of the accessory's key bits of functionality. First filed in July of 2011 and published by the USPTO today, the patent described as an "accessory device with magnetic attachment" details how magnets can be used in a particular manner to attach a cover to a device (like an iPad) and secure it in place, yet still allow it to be easily released. Again, that doesn't cover all cases that use magnets -- just magnets used in this very specific way. Hit the source link below for all the details in patent-speak.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/">Apple snags a patent for the Smart Cover's magnetic know-how</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20197212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/20/apple-snags-a-patent-for-the-smart-covers-magnetic-know-how/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>case</category><category>cover</category><category>ipad</category><category>magnet</category><category>magnetic</category><category>magnets</category><category>patent</category><category>smart cover</category><category>SmartCover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's second slide-to-unlock case against Samsung stayed in Germany]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/samsung-slide-to-unlock.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Nothing like a little drama in the <strike>ongoing</strike> never-ending saga <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung,apple">between</a> Samsung and Apple to spice up your Friday morning, eh? As legions of consumers are cashing in a vacation day in order to pick up one of Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/apple-new-ipad-hands-on/">newest iPads</a>, a court in Mannheim, Germany has stayed Apple's second slide-to-unlock case. According to <i>FOSS Patents</i>, the decision was made for the "duration of a parallel proceeding before the German Patent and Trademark Office that could lead to the revocation, in whole or in part, of Apple's slide-to-unlock utility model." Purportedly, the judge said that the court was not convinced of the "validity of that intellectual property right in all respects, with particular concern about the broadest group of claims." Lawyers who'd love to do nothing more than read about things related to their profession can tap that source link; everyone else can resume their best efforts of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/steve-wozniak-waiting-in-line/">trying to be Woz</a> when they grow up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/">Apple's second slide-to-unlock case against Samsung stayed in Germany</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20194990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/16/apple-samsung-slide-to-unlock-patent-case-germany/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>case</category><category>court</category><category>german</category><category>germany</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>Mannheim</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>samsung</category><category>slide to unlock</category><category>SlideToUnlock</category><category>suit</category><category>trademark</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Hague to Samsung: no injunction for 3G patent infringement if Apple's willing to FRAND license]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/"><img alt="The Hague tells Samsung: no injunctions for alleged 3G patent infringement if Apple's willing to license the IP " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/apple-v-sammy.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Since it's been more than 24 hours since the last bit of news in the ongoing legal battle between <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/">Samsung and Apple</a>, we figured you could do with another litigation revelation. Late <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/14/dutch-court-turns-down-samungs-request-to-block-apple-products/">last year</a>, the Hague shot down Sammy's request to prevent iPads and iPhones from being sold in the Netherlands. Today, the Dutch court went a step further, telling the Korean company that it can't pursue any other injunctions based upon its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/apple-etsi-frand-licensing-policy/">FRAND</a> 3G patents as long as Cupertino's willing to talk about licensing them. Not only that, it went on to hold that those patents don't apply in Sammy's case against the iPhone 4S due to the theory of patent exhaustion. The allegedly infringing bits in the handset are made by Qualcomm, who licensed the technology directly from Samsung -- granting Apple protection under the license as a third party beneficiary -- and Apple prevailed using arguments not unlike those it made in a suit it recently filed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-sues-motorola-over-qualcomm-license-makes-us-dream-of-a-w/">against Motorola</a>. Score one more legal victory for Tim Cook and company, but as you already know, the war is far from over.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/">The Hague to Samsung: no injunction for 3G patent infringement if Apple's willing to FRAND license</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20193481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/the-hague-to-samsung-no-injunction-for-3g-patent-infringement-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3g</category><category>apple</category><category>dutch</category><category>frand</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>ip</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>license</category><category>licensing</category><category>litigation</category><category>netherlands</category><category>patent</category><category>patent exhaustion</category><category>PatentExhaustion</category><category>patents</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>samsung</category><category>the hague</category><category>TheHague</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple simplifies its ITC suit against Samsung: drops one patent and several claims from two more]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/samsung-apple-240.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: left;" /></a>While there's been plenty of legal wrangling between <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2C+samsung">Apple and Samsung</a> in Federal courtrooms lately, it's been awhile since we've had news from the parties' parallel proceedings <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/apple-files-itc-request-to-block-import-of-select-samsung-device/">occurring in the ITC</a>. No longer. Last week, Apple received a favorable outcome when the ITC issued its claim construction order, siding with Apple's interpretations of two patents -- for those who aren't familiar, claim construction is the process by which the judge determines the meaning of specific terms in the claims, and it often has great influence on findings of infringement (or non-infringement). The judge found in favor of Samsung regarding one patent in his claim construction order, however, and now Apple has dropped that patent from the proceedings, along with claims from two of its other patents as well. This latest legal maneuvering by Cupertino is pretty standard fare, as paring down the legal issues is something all courts encourage to make the adjudication process more efficient, and Apple is simply distilling its case down to its strongest arguments. Now that the claim construction's complete, next on the docket is the ITC's evidentiary hearing (read: trial) starting May 31st, and afterwards we'll finally get the ITC's decision. Stay tuned.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/">Apple simplifies its ITC suit against Samsung: drops one patent and several claims from two more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20191489/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/12/apple-simplifies-its-itc-suit-against-samsung-drops-one-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>claim construction</category><category>ClaimConstruction</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>ip</category><category>itc</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge says Apple can't pursue patent infringement case against Kodak]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/kodak.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 302px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>Apple was dealt a setback today in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/apple-kodak-patent-lawsuit-bankrupt/">efforts</a> to prevent Kodak from selling up to $2.6 billion worth of digital imaging patents, with U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper ruling that it would be an "inappropriate way forward" to allow Apple to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/">pursue patent litigation</a> against the bankrupt company. For its part, Apple had argued that one of those patents -- concerning the ability to preview digital photos on an LCD screen -- was "misappropriated" from its own technology, and that Kodak therefore shouldn't be allowed to sell it off as part of the planned sale (something Kodak obviously disputes). On that point, the judge did agree that the matter should be resolved soon, just not in the manner in which Apple had been proceeding, further adding that he "would request that the parties report to me on their efforts to come up with a procedure that truly works."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/">Judge says Apple can't pursue patent infringement case against Kodak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189297/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/08/judge-says-apple-cant-pursue-patent-infringement-case-against-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>kodak</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>patent suit</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentSuit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung files yet another lawsuit against Apple in South Korea]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/stopinthenameoflove-1331114086.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> In the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/">global courtroom conflict</a> that threatens to outlast the Thirty-Years War, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung/">Samsung</a> has commenced yet another lawsuit against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple">Apple</a>. Filed in a Seoul court, this particular litigation broadside alleges that Cupertino has infringed patents on the displaying of data, user interface and short text messages -- <em>sigh</em>.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/">Samsung files yet another lawsuit against Apple in South Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20187650/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Apple v Samsung</category><category>AppleVSamsung</category><category>Lawsuit</category><category>Litigation</category><category>minipost</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Patents</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung v Apple</category><category>SamsungVApple</category><category>South Korea</category><category>SouthKorea</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kodak moves to block Apple's latest patent suit from proceeding in federal district court]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/kodak.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 302px;" /></a></div><div> In a move that's sure to surprise no one, Kodak is fighting Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/apple-kodak-patent-lawsuit-bankrupt/">latest round</a> of patent litigation -- a suit that would force Kodak to pause plans to sell up to $2.6 billion in digital imaging patents as a condition of its bankruptcy loan. In documents filed late last week, Kodak argued the dispute should be heard by the same bankruptcy court that's already overseeing its insolvency proceedings. In fact, Kodak's bankruptcy filing back in January caused all pending litigation (from Apple and RIM, among others) to come to a screeching halt, but Apple is nonetheless pushing for a reboot, arguing it's the owner of "a number of valuable patents," including one that could be lost if that planned $2 billion sale goes through. So where might this legal catfight take place? A bankruptcy judge is expected to hear arguments from both sides on Thursday.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/">Kodak moves to block Apple's latest patent suit from proceeding in federal district court</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20186766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/kodak-moves-to-block-apples-latest-patent-suit-from-proceeding/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Bankrupt</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>bankruptcy court</category><category>BankruptcyCourt</category><category>Kodak</category><category>patch</category><category>patent</category><category>patent troll</category><category>Patent Trolls</category><category>patent war</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentTroll</category><category>PatentTrolls</category><category>PatentWar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[German court guns down third Samsung patent lawsuit, plus one from Apple]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/stopinthenameoflove.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Mannheim judge Andreas Voss is nothing if not decisive. <em>FOSSPatents</em> reports he's just thrown out a third Samsung v. Apple patent lawsuit relating to use of the 3G/UMTS standard. Not to be one-sided, he's also rejected the first of two Apple v. Samsung cases involving slide-to-unlock patents. Weirdly, this latter decision appears to contradict a recent ruling by a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/">Munich court</a> that upheld a similar slide-to-unlock claim by Apple against Motorola, but Judge Voss and his trigger-finger aren't bothered. Keep it up old boy, and maybe we can have this whole thing nailed by the summer. Oh wait, no, both sides are expected to appeal.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/">German court guns down third Samsung patent lawsuit, plus one from Apple</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20184330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/judge-guns-down-samsung-and-apple-patent-lawsuits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple vs samsung</category><category>AppleVsSamsung</category><category>fosspatents</category><category>germany</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mannheim</category><category>patent</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung vs apple</category><category>SamsungVsApple</category><category>slide-to-unlock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple wins injunction against Motorola in Germany]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/"><img alt="Apple v. Motorola" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/mannheim.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 593px; height: 306px; " /></a></div>Today the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/09/motorola-wins-injunction-against-apple-sales-international-in-ge/">Munich I Regional Court</a> handed down a decision awarding Apple an injunction against all Motorola products that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,motorola">violate a patent</a> on "portable electronic device[s] for photo management." That overly broad-sounding claim appears to apply specifically to the bouncing over scroll animation found in the company's photo gallery application, so a small tweak to the existing software could quickly and quietly put this issue to rest. Still, according to <em>FOSS Patents'</em> Florian Mueller, there is a small (and we do mean <em>small</em>) chance that Apple could choose to enforce the ban, which could require Motorola to destroy all existing products that violate the claim. This includes items already on shelves, which would have to be recalled. More likely though, despite Apple's victory regarding the zoomed-<strike>out</strike> in view in the Android gallery app, Motorola will continue to be able to sell the Xoom and two infringing phones. On a somewhat related note, is it safe yet to officially dub Germany the successor to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/texas,patent">Texas' Eastern District</a> -- patent trolling capital of the world?<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> We erroneously stated that it was the zoomed-out view that was found to be in violation of the patent, when in fact it was the zoomed-in one. Motorola successfully defended itself against claims the zoomed-out interface also infringed on Apple's patents. Motorola reached out to us with the following statement:<blockquote> <p>  "Today's ruling in Munich, Germany on the patent litigation brought by Apple concerns a software feature associated with performing certain functions when viewing photos in a 'zoomed in' mode on mobile devices. We note that the Court ruled that performing the functions in a 'zoomed out' mode does not infringe on this patent. We expect no impact to supply or future sales as we have already implemented a new way to view photos on our products that does not interfere with the user experience."</p></blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/">Apple wins injunction against Motorola in Germany</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20183637/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>apple</category><category>breaking news</category><category>germany</category><category>injunction</category><category>ios</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Motorola</category><category>motorola mobility</category><category>MotorolaMobility</category><category>patent</category><category>patent dispute</category><category>patent violations</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentViolations</category><category>photo gallery</category><category>PhotoGallery</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple scores temporary ruling in Motorola battle, can keep selling iPads, iPhones in Germany]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/2011-10-18-dsc02554.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></div>Apple today won a victory in Germany in its on-going legal dispute with Motorola Mobility. An appeals court in that country ruled that Cupertino can continue to offer its wares in its online store while it appeals a ruling that temporarily barred their sale. According to the court, the continuation of such a ban on iPads and iPhones would affect Motorola's abilities to maintain its "duties under antitrust rules." The temporary ruling is the latest in an on-going legal <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/motorola,apple,lawsuit">tug of war</a> between the two handset makers in that country.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/">Apple scores temporary ruling in Motorola battle, can keep selling iPads, iPhones in Germany</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20180377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/27/apple-scores-temporary-ruling-in-motorola-battle-can-keep-selli/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ban</category><category>essential patent</category><category>essential patents</category><category>EssentialPatent</category><category>EssentialPatents</category><category>germany</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>patent dispute</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>temporary ruling</category><category>TemporaryRuling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Heater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft files EU antitrust complaint against Motorola Mobility, claims unfair licensing practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/motolog.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 10px; float: left;" /></a>Early last week, the European Commission <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/google-gets-eu-approval-for-its-purchase-of-motorola-mobility/">gave Google its blessing</a> regarding the purchase of Motorola Mobility. But the honeymoon has been anything but relaxing for the search giant and its latest power-play acquisition, after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/">Apple filed an antitrust complaint</a>, claiming a breach of the company's FRAND obligations. Now Microsoft is waiving the antitrust flag as well, claiming that the company is reportedly abusing its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-motorola-germany-patent-lawsuit">standard-essential patents</a>, impeding fair access to patents that are fundamental to regular device function -- this time dealing with video streaming and wireless connectivity. Microsoft Deputy General Counsel Dave Heiner has posted an appeal to the company's TechNet blog, outlining the issue and explaining that "Motorola is attempting to block sales of Windows PCs, our Xbox game console and other products," further claiming that "Motorola is on a path to use standard essential patents to kill video on the Web, and Google as its new owner doesn't seem to be willing to change course." The key issue at hand is patent pricing -- Microsoft claims that Motorola is demanding an impossibly high royalty of $22.50 for a $1,000 laptop, and that only covers fees for H.264 licensing. It's no secret that Motorola's patent portfolio was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/editorial-engadget-on-googles-motorola-mobility-acquisition/">a key component</a> of Google's acquisition, and so far it doesn't appear that the company is making any suggestion that Motorola ease up on licensing fees. As always, we'll be keeping an eye on the process, but hit up the source link below for the full scoop from MS.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/">Microsoft files EU antitrust complaint against Motorola Mobility, claims unfair licensing practices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20176915/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-files-eu-antitrust-complaint-against-motorola-mobility/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>court</category><category>cupertino</category><category>etsi</category><category>europe</category><category>European Commission</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>FRAND</category><category>google</category><category>infringement</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>microsoft</category><category>motorola</category><category>motorola mobility</category><category>MotorolaMobility</category><category>patent</category><category>policy</category><category>standards</category><category>transparency</category><category>umts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple asks EU regulators to step in on Motorola patent dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/2011-10-18-dsc02554.jpg" /></a></div>Apple <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/apple-etsi-frand-licensing-policy/">already asked</a> the European Telecommunications Standards Institute for more transparency on FRAND licensing, and now it's seeking a full-blown intervention. Motorola Mobility claims it received a letter on Friday from the European Commission advising there has been a complaint against it from Apple. The letter also stated that Cupertino wants the Commission to enforce the firm's standards-essential patents that breach agreed FRAND commitments. This latest development comes just one day after a German court awarded Apple an injunction against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/">Motorola's implementation</a> of slide-to-unlock on smartphones, as well as an ongoing saga of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/motorola,apple,lawsuit">similar disputes</a> with the firm. It's also just days after the European Commission approved <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/google-gets-eu-approval-for-its-purchase-of-motorola-mobility/">Google's acquisition</a> of the handset maker, based on beliefs that it "does not itself raise competition issues."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/">Apple asks EU regulators to step in on Motorola patent dispute</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20174776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/18/apple-asks-eu-regulators-to-step-in-on-motorola-patent-dispute/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>court</category><category>cupertino</category><category>etsi</category><category>europe</category><category>European Commission</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>FRAND</category><category>google</category><category>infringement</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>motorola</category><category>motorola mobility</category><category>MotorolaMobility</category><category>patent</category><category>policy</category><category>standards</category><category>transparency</category><category>umts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ITC closes the book on HTC's first complaint against Apple, still working on its sequels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/"><img alt="HTC vs. Apple" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/05-12-10htcitc-1273697234.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 328px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Remember that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/12/htc-files-patent-complaint-against-apple-asks-for-iphone-ipad/">first shot</a> across Apple's bow that HTC fired way back May of 2010? No? We don't blame you. Since that initial exchange of complaints against each other the patent war has spun almost completely out of control. Well, in October an ITC judge handed down an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/17/itc-judge-says-apple-did-not-infringe-on-htcs-patents-in-initia/">initial ruling</a>, rejecting the Taiwanese manufacturer's claim that Cupertino and crew had infringed upon its patents. Now, almost four months later, a final judgment has been issued, consistent with the initial decision -- Apple is not in violation of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/12/htcs-complaint-against-apple-examined/">patents in question</a> (which primarily concern the dialer and power management features) and the investigation has officially been closed. Don't get your hopes up too much though, this is just the first complaint in a long series of suits the two have filed against each other and HTC can always appeal in a federal circuit court. In other words, there's plenty more where this came from.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/">ITC closes the book on HTC's first complaint against Apple, still working on its sequels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20174592/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/itc-closes-the-book-on-htcs-first-complaint-against-apple-stil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>htc</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>itc</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patent complain</category><category>Patent Dispute</category><category>PatentComplain</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>patents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple granted injunction in German patent suit, Motorola phones with slide-to-unlock at risk]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/stopinthenameofapple.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple/">Apple</a> scored a huge victory today in Munich's Regional Court where Judge Dr. Peter Guntz found <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/motorola/">Motorola's</a> implementation of slide-to-unlock on smartphones to be in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-motorola-germany-patent-lawsuit/">breach of Cupertino's patent holdings</a>. The ruling has resulted in a permanent injunction that Apple could execute at will, forcing Moto to alter the UX it employs across its device portfolio in Deutschland. The case originally focused on three separate applications of this gesture tech -- two for phones, alone -- but for now, the one used on the Xoom has been deemed outside of Apple's purview. Naturally, both parties are expected to appeal this decision, with Apple gunning for a total victory on every derivation of patent EP1964022 and Motorola seeking to overturn the win. Nonetheless, this particular legal triumph could help to set a precedent for the company as it continues to rage an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,motorola,lawsuit">IP war</a> against fellow mobile industry rivals.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/">Apple granted injunction in German patent suit, Motorola phones with slide-to-unlock at risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20173322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-granted-injunction-in-germany-patent-suit-motorola-phones/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>EP1964022</category><category>Germany</category><category>injunction</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Motorola</category><category>Motorola Xoom</category><category>MotorolaXoom</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>ruling</category><category>slide to unlock</category><category>SlideToUnlock</category><category>smartphones</category><category>Xoom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple v. Samsung: Cupertino's latest complaint alleges 17 devices infringe 8 of its patents]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/"><img alt="Apple v. Samsung: Cupertino's latest complaint alleges 17 devices infringe 8 of its patents" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/stopinthenameofapple-1323372041.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: left;" /></a>We were waiting for the details of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">Apple's new lawsuit</a> in its global battle against Samsung, and now that the court has posted the complaint, we have them. These fresh allegations claim Sammy has... you guessed it, infringed upon Apple's intellectual property. Turns out, there are eight patents at issue, with four of the patents in question having been granted since the last time Apple filed suit against the Korean firm. Among these are patents for missed call management, slide-to-unlock and data-syncing technology. Apple isn't just targeting the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/24/galaxy-nexus-hspa-review/">Galaxy Nexus</a> with this suit as previously thought, either. In fact, at least 17 devices are alleged to have infringed, including all the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/30/galaxy-s-ii-finally-lands-on-american-shores-for-sprint-t-mobil/">US Galaxy S II variants</a>, both the Galaxy Player 4.0 and 5.0, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/21/samsung-galaxy-tab-7-0-plus-review/">Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus</a> and Galaxy Tab 8.9. So, should the Northern District of California decide to grant Apple's request for a preliminary injunction, a hefty chunk of Samsung's mobile products will be barred from store shelves here in the States. It'll be a bit before we hear Sammy's side of the story, but for now, you can see all of Apple's latest legal arguments below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">Apple v. Samsung: Cupertino's latest complaint alleges 17 devices infringe 8 of its patents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20172979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>galaxy nexus</category><category>galaxy player</category><category>galaxy s ii</category><category>galaxy tab</category><category>GalaxyNexus</category><category>GalaxyPlayer</category><category>GalaxySIi</category><category>GalaxyTab</category><category>gsii</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>ip</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>preliminary injuction</category><category>PreliminaryInjuction</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:24:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
