<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cisco sues TiVo to nullify four DVR patents, claims TiVo's just a big meanie]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/"><img alt="TiVo frown" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/sad-tivo.jpg" style="width: 126px; height: 200px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 12px 16px; float: right;" /></a>TiVo is known for being <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/tivo-sues-twc-motorola-mobility/">more than a bit aggressive</a> in claiming patent rights for its DVRs, and Cisco has apparently had the last straw.  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ScientificAtlanta/">Scientific Atlanta's</a> owner has sued TiVo this week in an attempt to negate four patents that TiVo is allegedly using to bully Cisco and other set-top box makers.  As long as those patents are active or usable against others, TiVo will refuse to give a fair license, Cisco says -- leaving competitors with little choice but to either agree to a costly settlement or risk a ban.  Before championing Cisco as the underdog, remember that it's likely counting on a large patent library as a Sword of Damocles over TiVo's head that could fall if TiVo decides on a countersuit.  Regardless of the strategic maneuvering, there's no doubt that Cisco is hoping to avoid a lawsuit on the scale of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/02/dish-network-will-pay-tivo-500-million-to-settle-dvr-lawsuit/">epic-length EchoStar case</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/">Cisco sues TiVo to nullify four DVR patents, claims TiVo's just a big meanie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20249664/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/01/cisco-sues-tivo-to-nullify-four-dvr-patents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cisco</category><category>digital video recorder</category><category>DigitalVideoRecorder</category><category>dvr</category><category>echostar</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>home entertainment</category><category>HomeEntertainment</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>patent</category><category>patent suit</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentSuit</category><category>scientific atlanta</category><category>ScientificAtlanta</category><category>tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google lobs antitrust complaint against Microsoft, Nokia in EU, claims they're playing patent footsie (updated)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/"><img alt="European Union flags" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/eu-4g.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 450px;" /></a></p><p> The gloves just came off at Google: the company has just filed an antitrust complaint with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EuropeanCommission/">European Commission</a> against Microsoft and Nokia. Its gripe accuses the two Windows Phone partners of playing dirty pool through handing 1,200 wireless-related patents to Mosaid, a Canadian firm which spends most of its time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/mosaid-gets-into-wifi-patent-game-sues-17-companies-including-d/">suing the industry over WiFi</a> rather than making products. Microsoft and Nokia are allegedly hiking the prices of devices by "creating patent trolls" that bypass deals preventing them from suing directly, possibly steering a few companies towards picking Windows Phone instead of Android.</p><p> Google argues that it's launching the complaint as an early defensive measure. Neither Microsoft nor Nokia has responded, although there's a degree of irony to the action: the complaints assert that Nokia is jeopardizing standards-based patents, but Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/">recent acquisition</a> Motorola has itself <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/">come under EU scrutiny</a> for possibly abusing standards with its lawsuits against Apple and Microsoft. Either way, it's clear Google is concerned that Microsoft's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/microsoft-and-samsung-sitting-in-a-tree-patent-s-h-a-r-i-n-g/">Android patent licensing campaign</a> might lose its decorum in the near future.</p><p></p><p> <strong>Update</strong>: Nokia's decided to have its say, in an email to <em>Reuters</em>:</p><blockquote> <p>  "Though we have not yet seen the complaint, Google's suggestion that Nokia and Microsoft are colluding on intellectual property rights is wrong. Both companies have their own IPR portfolios and strategies and operate independently." </p></blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/">Google lobs antitrust complaint against Microsoft, Nokia in EU, claims they're playing patent footsie (updated)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 31 May 2012 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20249040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/google-lobs-antitrust-complaint-against-microsoft-and-nokia-in-eu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>antitrust</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>complaint</category><category>ec</category><category>eu</category><category>european commission</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>frand</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>licensing</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft windows phone</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsPhone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mosaid</category><category>nokia</category><category>patent</category><category>patent troll</category><category>patent trolls</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentTroll</category><category>PatentTrolls</category><category>standards</category><category>Standards Essential</category><category>standards-essential</category><category>StandardsEssential</category><category>windows phone</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Ventures' Nathan Myhrvold defends patent trolling, calls tech industry immature]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/"><img alt="Intellectual Ventures' Nathan Mhyrvold" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/intellectual-ventures-nathan-mhyrvold.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> Intellectual Ventures' CEO and founder Nathan Myhrvold, who previously spent some 14 years at Microsoft Research, took the stage here at D10, and as predicted, his interview with Walt Mossberg was quite the invigorating one. You may know the man and his company for its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/06/intellectual-ventures-takes-aim-at-motorola-over-alleged-patent/">vicious</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/23/htc-and-samsung-license-entire-intellectual-ventures-patent-port/">patent trolling</a> -- or, what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/30/rim-strikes-licensing-deal-with-intellectual-ventures-for-30-000/">appears to be</a> patent trolling. In essence, a lot of its business comes from acquiring patent portfolios, and then licensing and / or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/09/intellectual-ventures-begins-tech-patent-offensive-files-three/">suing companies</a> to "enforce" them. Naturally, Nathan has a radically different perspective than most sane individuals on the matter, insisting that the system isn't necessarily broken, and that "making money from enforcing patents is no more wrong than investing in preferred stock."</p><p> The talk centered predominantly around how Intellectual Ventures operates, what it does, and if its CEO feels that the "rat's nest of lawsuits" -- as Walt put it -- was getting out of control. Despite saying that his company has hundreds of people working on new inventions to help deliver medicines in Africa (in response to a question from the crowd on whether his outfit was truly helping people), he confessed that suing to enforce patents was simply another method of capitalism working. Care to take a ride on the crazy train? Head on past the break for a few choice quotes from the interview.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intellectual Ventures' Nathan Myhrvold defends patent trolling, calls tech industry immature</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/">Intellectual Ventures' Nathan Myhrvold defends patent trolling, calls tech industry immature</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20247879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/intellectual-ventures-nathan-myhrvold-defends-patent-trolling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all things d</category><category>all things d 10</category><category>all things digital</category><category>AllThingsD</category><category>AllThingsD10</category><category>AllThingsDigital</category><category>atd</category><category>atd10</category><category>atdx</category><category>conference</category><category>d10</category><category>dx</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>Intellectual Ventures</category><category>IntellectualProperty</category><category>IntellectualVentures</category><category>ip</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft research</category><category>MicrosoftResearch</category><category>Nathan Mhyrvold</category><category>NathanMhyrvold</category><category>patent</category><category>patent troll</category><category>patent trolls</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentTroll</category><category>PatentTrolls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/"><img alt="Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review'" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/evo.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> HTC-branded crates have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/customs-slowly-letting-htc-handsets-into-the-us/">trickling through customs</a> for ten days already, following a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-delayed-at-customs-due-to-itc-exclusio/">total clamp-down</a> earlier in May, but it's only now that they're able to pass through without lengthy extra checks. The manufacturer says it has "completed the review process with US Customs" and that it is "confident that we will soon be able to meet the demand for our products." That obviously raises the question as to why the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/htc-one-x-for-att-review/">HTC One X</a> and<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/htc-evo-4g-lte-for-sprint-review/"> EVO 4G LTE</a> devices were held up in the first place. The ITC had earlier ruled that HTC infringed on an Apple patent about data detection, concerning a handset's ability to recognize and move around personal data, for example between the contact entry and the calendar, and it had given HTC until April to remove that feature. HTC agreed to that, but it appears customs officials initially needed to check every box to ensure that products arriving in the US were of the compliant type. Meanwhile, the LTE part of the EVO 4G is still waiting for its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/fcc-clears-sprint-to-run-cdma-and-4g-lte-on-800mhz/">luggage</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/">Customs stops delaying HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE devices after 'review'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 May 2012 03:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20247375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/30/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-customs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>att</category><category>bureaucracy</category><category>customs</category><category>evo 4g lte</category><category>Evo4gLte</category><category>government</category><category>htc</category><category>htc one x</category><category>HtcOneX</category><category>import</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>itc</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>official</category><category>officials</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>red-tape</category><category>regulation</category><category>spring evo 4g lte</category><category>SpringEvo4gLte</category><category>sprint</category><category>sprint evo 4g</category><category>SprintEvo4g</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 03:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft patent outlines smart power-saving system that reads your diary, leaves a tip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/"><img alt="Microsoft patent outlines smart power saving system that reads your diary, leaves a tip" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/msoftpowersavinpredictorpatent.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 265px;" /></a></p><p> Always leave your PC on while you watch the latest <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GameOfThrones/">Game of Thrones</a></em>? Someone at Microsoft evidently does. A granted patent outlines a model that uses historical usage data to predict when it might be able to tweak power needs of the processor in the future, and for how long. So, perhaps you leave your machine on overnight, and jump on at 8am every day? It'd know this and make frugal use of resources accordingly. This, of course, could help fill your pockets and maybe cover <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/microsoft-to-offer-15-windows-8-upgrade/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/microsoft-to-offer-15-windows-8-upgrade/">that upgrade</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/">Microsoft patent outlines smart power-saving system that reads your diary, leaves a tip</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 May 2012 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20246675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-power-saving-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>granted patent</category><category>GrantedPatent</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft patent</category><category>MicrosoftPatent</category><category>patent</category><category>power saving</category><category>power savings</category><category>PowerSaving</category><category>PowerSavings</category><category>sleep mode</category><category>SleepMode</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft patents asking your friends 'does my butt look big in this?']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/"><img alt="Image" height="425" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/mspatent.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="578" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/19/microsoft-application-head-mounted-display/">Microsoft</a> has patented an online personal appearance adviser for those of us without a hotline straight through to <em>Put This On's</em> Jesse Thorn. Simply upload a pair of pictures of yourself in different hair, makeup and clothing choices and let the denizens of the internet vote on which one makes you look the best. Sounding similar to <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/04/scientists-devise-software-that-can-interpret-attractiveness/">HotorNot</a></em> and <em>FaceMash</em>, this patent purports to shift the emphasis to help the style-challenged choose a suitable wardrobe. We just hope the company built in some snark-protection -- or else we might see plenty of ingenues with ruined self esteem arrive at the opera in a dinosaur costume.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/">Microsoft patents asking your friends 'does my butt look big in this?'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 May 2012 17:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20246649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/microsoft-image-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Clothing Choices</category><category>ClothingChoices</category><category>Comparison</category><category>Dressing</category><category>FaceMash</category><category>Fashion</category><category>Hot or Not</category><category>HotOrNot</category><category>Jesse Thorn</category><category>JesseThorn</category><category>Judging</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Patent</category><category>MicrosoftPatent</category><category>Patent</category><category>Put This On</category><category>PutThisOn</category><category>Self-Esteem</category><category>Snog Marry Avoid</category><category>SnogMarryAvoid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google patents view augmentation method and glasses, sees what you cannot]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/"><img alt="Google patents view augmentation method and glasses, sees what you cannot" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/patentglasses.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 417px;" /></a></p><p> Google <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/">continues</a> to keep our friends down at the US Patents and Trademark Office busy with its latest filing, involving augmented reality and a pair of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/google-project-glass-with-glasses/">relatively staid</a> (at least by these sketches) pair of glasses. The patent outlines a system where a view-finder could identify what we're gawking at, adding in extra factual details and also outlining new points of interest -- including those that aren't necessarily within the view of our own eyes. The glasses would then be able to notify us with a medley of visual indicators and cues (including the slightly awkward notion of light-up frames), guiding our gaze to something we'd hopefully want to take a look at.</p><p> There's more to Google's latest idea than simple tourist-centric finger-pointing though, also looking to augment how we read. The device would detect when someone is reading from a digital display and even feel out the rest of the information currently out of view. It would then direct readers to points of interest; possibly pictures, possibly those important factual nuggets -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent/">patent</a> still plays loose with the specifics. But if you're into such vague and fanciful product description, you can take a look at the full filing at the source below.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/">Google patents view augmentation method and glasses, sees what you cannot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 29 May 2012 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20246663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/29/google-patents-view-augmentation-method-and-glasses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>augmented reality</category><category>augmented view</category><category>AugmentedReality</category><category>AugmentedView</category><category>glass</category><category>glasses</category><category>google</category><category>patent</category><category>project glass</category><category>ProjectGlass</category><category>United States Patent and Trademark Office</category><category>UnitedStatesPatentAndTrademarkOffice</category><category>uspto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Huawei files EU antitrust complaint against InterDigital]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/"><img alt="Image" height="229" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/huaweilawsuit.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> Huawei has filed an EU <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/">antitrust complaint</a> against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/09/apple-licenses-interdigital-tech-presumably-for-3g-iphone/">InterDigital</a> to end its "abuse" of the allegedly standards-essential patents it controls. The company has urged the commission to examine its demands, which are considered too hefty to come under the protection of FRAND terms. The shoe normally resides on the other foot, with InterDigital previously instigating battles with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/14/nokia-interdigital-patent-drama-continues-with-itc-ruling-in-e/">Nokia</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/25/samsung-settles-up-with-interdigital-in-long-running-patent-infr">Samsung</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/27/interdigital-files-itc-complaint-against-nokia-huawei-and-zte/">ZTE.</a> This time, it looks like the Chinese giant was tired of being pushed around by what it's derisorily called a non-practicing entity -- which we've taken to be a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent+troll/">polite euphemism</a>.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> InterDigital has released a statement, which we've included after the break.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Huawei files EU antitrust complaint against InterDigital</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/">Huawei files EU antitrust complaint against InterDigital</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 28 May 2012 10:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20246309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/28/huawei-eu-antitrust-interdigital/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3G</category><category>Antitrust</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>FRAND</category><category>Huawei</category><category>InterDigital</category><category>ITC</category><category>Licensing</category><category>Litigation</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Infringement</category><category>Patent Licensing</category><category>Patent Troll</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>PatentLicensing</category><category>Patents</category><category>PatentTroll</category><category>Standards-Essential</category><category>UMTS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 10:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung submits patent application for speech-recognizing robot]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/"><img alt="Samsung submits patent application for speech-recognizing robot" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/samsung-speech-robo.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 595px; height: 310px; " /></a></p><p> Samsung will soon launch its Siri-style <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-s-voice-smartstay-galaxy-siii/">S Voice</a> software on the Galaxy S III, but in the more distant future it could bring speech recognition technology to standalone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/robot/">robots</a>. A patent application from the company details an automaton that can adjust its voice detection capabilities to account for ambient noise, letting it recognize when people are talking even in loud locations. It remains unclear just what the robot will do for you once it hears your commands -- maybe it will be on call for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/23/voice-controlled-japanese-robot-assists-with-eating-makes-veggi/">cooking you dinner</a> and the like. Judging by that pic, at least, the concept looks like a good time for all involved.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/">Samsung submits patent application for speech-recognizing robot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 May 2012 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244278/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/samsung-patent-application-speech-recognizing-robot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>patent applications</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>PatentApplications</category><category>patents</category><category>robot</category><category>Robots</category><category>s voice</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>Samsung patent</category><category>samsung patent application</category><category>samsung s voice</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>SamsungPatent</category><category>SamsungPatentApplication</category><category>SamsungSVoice</category><category>SIRI</category><category>SVoice</category><category>voice control</category><category>voice controls</category><category>voice recognition</category><category>voice recognition robot</category><category>VoiceControl</category><category>VoiceControls</category><category>VoiceRecognition</category><category>VoiceRecognitionRobot</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Silbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft beats Motorola in German SMS patent suit, litigation world cup continues]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/"><img alt="all day sign" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/lawsuitsign.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/01/apple-wins-injunction-against-motorola-in-germany/">Munich's regional court</a> has ruled that Motorola is infringing one of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/microsoft-moves-logistics-center-out-of-germany/">Microsoft's</a> patents relating to displaying multiple SMS messages. It's one of the sub-cases that's separate to the larger FRAND matters that are raging along in the background, but still has enormous ramifications. Redmond's deputy general counsel, David Howard said that he hoped Motorola would (join over <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/12/microsoft-lg-patent-license/">70 percent</a> of all Android OEMs) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/pegatron-licenses-microsofts-patent-porfolio-for-android-and-ch/">license</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/08/microsoft-wants-a-share-of-huaweis-android-profits/">Microsoft's</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/24/microsoft-signs-compal-deal-now-takes-money-from-half-of-all-an/">patent</a> portfolio. If <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter">Google's latest plaything</a> doesn't start writing cheques, then it's likely to have its handsets banned from Germany, at least in the short term.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft beats Motorola in German SMS patent suit, litigation world cup continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/">Microsoft beats Motorola in German SMS patent suit, litigation world cup continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 May 2012 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/microsoft-motorola-sms-patent-germany/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android Litigation</category><category>AndroidLitigation</category><category>Germany</category><category>Google</category><category>Licensing</category><category>Licensing agreement</category><category>LicensingAgreement</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Motorola</category><category>Munich regional court</category><category>MunichRegionalCourt</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Patents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/"><img alt="Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/applestylusitisapplied.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 518px; height: 450px;" /></a></p><p> Apple has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/jobs-if-you-see-a-stylus-or-a-task-manager-they-blew-it/">famously shunned</a> the humble <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/capacitive+stylus/">stylus</a>, so it's fair to say we're more than a little curious about why it's filed a patent application for one. The "optical stylus" mentioned seems simple enough. The claims outline the brains to interpret your doodlings, as well pressure and orientation. Beyond that, well, it's more or less just a stylus. While we suspected the team at Cupertino were fans of <em>Draw Something</em>, we didn't think they'd take it this seriously!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/">Apple applies for optical stylus patent, Hell reports coldest day on record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 24 May 2012 07:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20244126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/apple-applies-for-stylus-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple patent</category><category>apple stylus</category><category>ApplePatent</category><category>AppleStylus</category><category>cupertino</category><category>iphone stylus</category><category>IphoneStylus</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>stylus</category><category>stylus patent</category><category>StylusPatent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jury issues verdict in Android suit, finds that Google doesn't infringe Oracle patents]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/"><img alt="Image" height="376" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="593" /></a></p><p> It appears that the jury has come to a conclusion in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/">Oracle v. Google trial</a>, determining that Android does not infringe Oracle patents. Judge William Alsup of the US District Court for Northern California exonerated the search giant following a trial that lasted three weeks, ruling that Google did not infringe on six claims in US Patent RE38,104, along two claims in US Patent 6,061,520. Jurors were dismissed following today's ruling, with the trial's damages phase reportedly set to begin on Tuesday. According to <em>The Verge</em>, the jury did determine that Google was responsible for two counts of minor copyright infringement, relating to the order of Java APIs and several lines of rangeCheck code, which could be matched with a maximum penalty of $150,000 for each count. Regardless, it appears that the lawsuit, which <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/12/oracle-sues-google-over-java-patent-infringement-in-android/">dates back to 2010</a>, when Oracle filed against Google for copyright and patent infringement related to Sun's Java code, could finally be coming to a close.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/">Jury issues verdict in Android suit, finds that Google doesn't infringe Oracle patents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 May 2012 14:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20243704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>district court</category><category>DistrictCourt</category><category>google</category><category>ip</category><category>java</category><category>judgment</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>legal</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>oracle</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>ruling</category><category>us district court</category><category>UsDistrictCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Honig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google glasses gets raft of new patents, sniffs lawsuits coming from miles away]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/"><img alt="Image" height="297" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/glassespatents.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> Google will find four more granted patents for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/">Project Glass</a> sitting on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/googleplex-expansion/">over-sized</a> doorstep this morning. The company can now claim rights over the design of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/google-project-glass-with-glasses/">right half</a> of the device, where the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-project-glass/">camera hangs over the eye</a> and where the innards are housed within the band along the side. It's also patented the nose-pad sensor that knows when it's being worn, plus the ability to represent ambient sounds on the screen with range and direction info. Finally, it's also got rights on using each eyepiece as a separate display, with the example shown above demonstrating a map in one eye and navigation instructions in the other. The more we sift through the paperwork, the more we're reminded of the Dominion Warship <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/17/head-mounted-ar-trainer-is-another-star-trek-prop-come-to-life/">headsets</a> from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/08/star-trek-series-coming-to-netflix-watch-instantly-in-july-an/"><em>Deep Space Nine</em></a> -- but that could be just because we've been locked indoors for too long.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/">Google glasses gets raft of new patents, sniffs lawsuits coming from miles away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 22 May 2012 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-glasses-gets-raft-of-new-patents-sniffs-lawsuits-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AR</category><category>Augmented Reality</category><category>AugmentedReality</category><category>Fashion</category><category>Glasses</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Glasses</category><category>GoogleGlasses</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Grant</category><category>PatentGrant</category><category>Patents</category><category>Project Glass</category><category>ProjectGlass</category><category>USPTO</category><category>USTPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google officially closes deal for Motorola Mobility]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <img alt="Google officially closes deal for Motorola Mobility" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/2011-08-13-googdroid.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 218px; " /></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/google-acquiring-motorola-mobility/">Months in the making</a> -- the deal is finally done. Motorola Mobility is officially part of Google. After receiving blessings from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/google-gets-eu-approval-for-its-purchase-of-motorola-mobility/">Europe</a>, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/us-gives-its-blessing-to-googles-moto-purchase/">US</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/china-clears-google-acquisition-of-motorola/">China</a>, the Internet giant has put the finishing touches on its purchase of Moto's mobile division. Though the corporate marriage faced plenty of obstacles, Big G was able to put the manufacturer on its ledger for the price of $40 per share, or about $12.5 billion. As it stands, Motorola Mobility will continue to operate as a separate business entity and as a licensee of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/android">Android</a>, but Mountain View is still claiming the purchase will allow it to "supercharge" its mobile ecosystem. The future of the new subsidiary's employees is a different matter, however. Rumors have been swirling for the last week or so that there could be significant layoffs at Moto following the merger, which would further enforce the perception that Google is more interested in the company's patents than in entering the hardware business. Of course, whether or not we'll see layoffs or perhaps a Moto-branded Nexus is still a mystery. For a bit more on Google's victory lap, check out the PR after the break.</p><p> <strong>Update</strong>: Google has also settled on a replacement for Sanjay Jha as CEO of Motorola Mobility, Dennis Woodside. Woodside is a longtime Googler who got his start in sales, building out business in Africa, Eastern Europe and Russia, before becoming President of the Americas sales operation.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google officially closes deal for Motorola Mobility</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/">Google officially closes deal for Motorola Mobility</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 22 May 2012 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/google-officially-closes-deal-for-motorola-mobility/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>merger</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>motorola mobility</category><category>Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc</category><category>MotorolaMobility</category><category>MotorolaMobilityHoldingsInc</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>purchase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung: 'Lawyers didn't design the Galaxy S III']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/"><img alt="Image" height="327" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/afinch.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/">Samsung</a> design VP Chang Dong-hoon has refuted accusations that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview-hands-on/">Galaxy S III</a> was designed "by lawyers." Responding to the reports that stated the new handset was tweaked to circumvent deliberate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/apple-sues-samsung-heres-the-deal/">trade dress claims</a> made by Cupertino in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/18/apple-sues-samsung-over-for-copying-the-iphone-and-ipad/">lawsuit</a>, he said that the redesign is part of the company's five-year plan rather than a sudden change. He went on to say that the flagship went through hundreds of iterations before the team alighted upon the model that will shortly make its way into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/16/galaxy-s-iii-early-release-date/">sweaty palms</a> all over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/amazon-puts-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-up-for-us-pre-orders/">world</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/">Samsung: 'Lawyers didn't design the Galaxy S III'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 22 May 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/samsung-lawyers-galaxy-s-iii-design/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Apple</category><category>Chang Dong-hoon</category><category>ChangDong-hoon</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Galaxy S III</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>Google</category><category>Lawsuit</category><category>Lawyers</category><category>Litigation</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Patent</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung Galaxy S III</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>Trade Dress</category><category>TradeDress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/"><img alt="Kodak, Apple and RIM go pow" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/kodak-apple-rim.jpg" style="width: 522px; height: 198px;" /></a></p><p> Kodak <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/kodak-chapter-11-bankruptcy/">hasn't caught a break</a> lately, and that trend isn't easing up any time soon with a second rejection arriving in its main International Trade Commission (ITC) patent dispute with Apple and RIM. Despite having <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/02/kodak-granted-reprieve-in-its-itc-battle-with-apple-and-rim/">had its case remanded</a> after a loss last year, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Kodak/">Kodak</a> is once more being told that BlackBerrys and iPhones don't violate a patent on previewing photos. The one violation was rendered moot through "obviousness," according to administrative law judge Thomas Pender. It's still an initial ruling, and Kodak is trying to put a positive light on the situation -- it's "pleased" there's still an infringement, even if the patent claim is invalid -- but the patent wars aren't looking good for a photography company that has already had to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/09/kodak-to-shutter-digital-camera-production-this-year/">give up cameras</a> to have a chance of staying afloat. Most of Kodak's hope, then, will be pinned on a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/kodak-files-new-itc-lawsuits-against-apple-and-htc/">second wave of ITC disputes</a> that might stand a better chance of putting at least Apple's feet to the fire.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/">ITC says again that Apple and RIM don't violate Kodak patent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 21 May 2012 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20242056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/21/itc-says-again-that-apple-and-rim-dont-violate-kodak-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>Bankrupt</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>camera</category><category>cameras</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>dispute</category><category>disputes</category><category>imaging</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>iphone</category><category>itc</category><category>Kodak</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>photography</category><category>Research In Motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>RIM</category><category>ruling</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>us international trade commission</category><category>us itc</category><category>UsInternationalTradeCommission</category><category>UsItc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung chief: we're open to a cross-licensing deal with Apple, but 4G chip shortage might last until the fall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/jk-shin-samsung-galaxy-s-iii.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 404px;" /></a></p><p> The at times <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">very heated legal battle</a> between Apple and Samsung might be softening just a bit ahead of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/28/apple-samsung-patent-mediation-court-date/">truce talks</a> on May 21st. Samsung's mobile head <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/JKShin/">JK Shin</a> just left Seoul for the mediated discussions saying there were still "several negotiation options" on tap, including the possibility of cross-licensing patents. He warned that there was still a "big gap" between the two sides, and we'd tend to agree -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">neither Apple</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/07/samsung-v-apple-korea/">nor Samsung</a> is exactly backing off just yet. However, it's a definite shift in language from March, when Shin was vowing "no compromise," and it parallels Apple CEO Tim Cook's own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/">disdain for lawsuits</a>. We just wouldn't bet money on the two singing "Kumbaya" this week.</p><p> In same breath, Shin added that an ongoing 4G chipset shortage wasn't letting up: he didn't see things getting better until the start of the fourth quarter, or October for us common folk. That's a problem for Samsung's phones and tablets most of all, of course, and in a dire case could see LTE-packing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-hspa-arriving-in-may-4g-version-hitting-n/">American Galaxy S III variants</a> rely on other vendors' chips to stay on the 4G bandwagon. There's also a chance of a ripple effect on other companies that want Samsung's parts, but short of getting a peek at Samsung's inner workings, we won't know the full impact for awhile yet.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/">Samsung chief: we're open to a cross-licensing deal with Apple, but 4G chip shortage might last until the fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 20 May 2012 13:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20241343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/samsung-chief-says-open-to-cross-licensing-deal-with-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4g</category><category>4G LTE</category><category>4G LTE Chipset</category><category>4gLte</category><category>4gLteChipset</category><category>android</category><category>Apple</category><category>apple ipad</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIpad</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>cross licensing</category><category>cross-licensing</category><category>CrossLicensing</category><category>galaxy s 3</category><category>galaxy s iii</category><category>galaxy tab</category><category>GalaxyS3</category><category>GalaxySIii</category><category>GalaxyTab</category><category>ipad</category><category>iphone</category><category>jk shin</category><category>JkShin</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>LTE</category><category>mediation</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patent lawsuit</category><category>patent suit</category><category>PatentLawsuit</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentSuit</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung galaxy s 3</category><category>samsung galaxy s iii</category><category>Samsung Galaxy Tab</category><category>SamsungGalaxyS3</category><category>SamsungGalaxySIii</category><category>SamsungGalaxyTab</category><category>settlement</category><category>settlements</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tim cook</category><category>TimCook</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple files (again) for a preliminary ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/"><img alt="Apple's filed for a preliminary injunction (again)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/tab.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> If you found yourself longing for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/20/samsungs-modified-galaxy-tab-10-1n-for-germany-gets-examined/">minor tweaks</a> Samsung made to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GalaxyTab101/">Galaxy Tab 10.1</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/09/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-ipad/">in Germany</a> earlier this year, you may be in luck: Apple's filed for a preliminary injunction against the slate stateside. It isn't the first one, either, Cupertino filed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">something similar</a> back in February, though it didn't quite pass legal muster. After gaining some headway <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">earlier this week</a>, Cook's crew is in for round two, according to <span style="font-style: italic;">FOSS </span><em>Patents</em>, asking for Judge Koh to rule in their favor without a new hearing. Concerned consumers, however, can sidestep the whole mess by simply opting for an injunction-exempt <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-review/">Galaxy Tab 2</a>. Details and speculation can be found at the source link below, just in case you aren't already sick to death of the whole <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2C+samsung%2C+lawsuit">Samsung / Apple</a> spat.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/">Apple files (again) for a preliminary ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 May 2012 02:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20241078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/19/apple-files-again-for-a-preliminary-ban-against-samsung/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appeal</category><category>appeals</category><category>appeals court</category><category>AppealsCourt</category><category>apple</category><category>cafc</category><category>federal court</category><category>FederalCourt</category><category>Galaxy Tab 10.1</category><category>GalaxyTab10.1</category><category>injunction</category><category>ipad</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>pr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft patent application outlines system to recommend and transfer apps across devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/"><img alt="Microsoft patent application for app transfers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/ms-patent-app.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 390px;" /></a></p><p> Ready for your latest tour through the dense and meandering wording of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent+application">patent applications</a>? Well, dig in, because it's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft/">Microsoft's</a> turn to confuse lawyers the world over with this latest USPTO doc, submitted in November of 2010. The filing describes a computer-based program that would, essentially, analyze a primary device's installed applications, cross-reference it with a different device and then either migrate that software batch or suggest similar apps to download on a secondary unit. Sounds a lot like a potential <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/windows+phone+marketplace/">Windows Phone Marketplace</a> recommendation / app transfer engine to us, but what exactly Redmond intends to use this pending patent for is anyone's guess. As always, if you care to sacrifice a few minutes of your life to mind-numbing legal jargon, then by all means hit up the source link below.</p><p></p><p></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/">Microsoft patent application outlines system to recommend and transfer apps across devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 May 2012 22:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20240748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/microsoft-patent-application-outlines-system-to-recommend-and-tr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>app</category><category>app sharing</category><category>apps</category><category>AppSharing</category><category>IP</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>patents</category><category>sharing</category><category>software</category><category>USPTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ITC bans Motorola mobile devices for infringing Microsoft patent (updated: MMI responds)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2011-12-20-motopic.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 381px;" /></a></p><p> At the end of last year, an Administrative Law Judge issued an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/itc-judge-issues-initial-ruling-that-motorola-infringes-microsof/">initial ruling</a> that Motorola's mobile devices infringe a bit of Microsoft's IP. Now, the Commission has affirmed that decision and issued an exclusion order to ban Moto's offending devices from importation into the US. In case you weren't aware, the four patent claims at issue generally cover technology for scheduling meetings over email using a mobile device. So, unless Motorola removes the feature, pays for a license or whips up a workaround Microsoft's patent in short order, its inbound RAZRs, Droid 4s, Bionics and other offending handsets will be stuck in customs alongside <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-delayed-at-customs-due-to-itc-exclusio/">HTC's One X and EVO 4G LTE</a> -- that is, unless Obama steps in to save the day during the prescribed presidential review period. Microsoft, naturally, is quite pleased with this development and has issued a statement:</p><blockquote> <p>  <span>Microsoft sued Motorola in the ITC only after Motorola chose to refuse Microsoft's efforts to renew a patent license for well over a year. We're pleased the full Commission agreed that Motorola has infringed Microsoft's intellectual property, and we hope that now Motorola will be willing to join the vast majority of Android device makers selling phones in the US by taking a license to our patents.</span></p> <p>  <i>-- </i><span>David Howard, corporate vice president and deputy general counsel Microsoft</span></p></blockquote><p> We've reached out to Motorola for comment on the matter as well, so stay tuned to see what it has to say.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> Motorola has issued an understandably somber statement on the ruling:</p><blockquote> <p>  <span>Microsoft started its ITC investigation asserting 9 patents</span><span> against Motorola Mobility</span><span>. </span><span> </span><span>Although we are disappointed by the Commission's ruling that </span><span>certain </span><span>Motorola Mobility</span><span> products</span><span> violated one patent, we look forward to reading the full opinion to understand its reasoning.  Motorola Mobility will not experience any impact in the near term, as the Commission's ruling is subject to a $0.33/per unit bond during the 60 day Presidential review period.  We will explore all options including appeal.</span></p></blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/">ITC bans Motorola mobile devices for infringing Microsoft patent (updated: MMI responds)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 May 2012 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20240979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/itc-bans-motorola-mobile-devices-for-infringing-microsoft-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ban</category><category>cellphones</category><category>exclusion order</category><category>ExclusionOrder</category><category>import ban</category><category>ImportBan</category><category>international trade commission</category><category>InternationalTradeCommission</category><category>itc</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google patent application could give Project Glass one true ring controller to rule them all]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/google-ring-patent-project-glass.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 595px; height: 465px;" /></a></p><p> Let's face it: right now, the head nods and other rudimentary controls of Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ProjectGlass/">Project Glass</a> are mostly useful for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/google-project-glass-sergey-brin/">looking good</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/googles-vic-gundotra-tries-project-glass-on-for-size/">sharing photos</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-project-glass/">not much else</a>. A US patent application submitted last September and just now published, however, raises the possibility of more sophisticated control coming from your hands. A ring, a bracelet or a even a fake fingernail with an infrared-reflective layer would serve as a gesture control marker for a receiver on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/heads-up+display">heads-up display</a> glasses. Having this extra control would give the glasses-mounted computing room to grow by learning gestures, and it could even depend on multiple ornaments for more sophisticated commands -- at least, if you don't mind looking like a very nerdy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Liberace/">Liberace</a>. We can imagine the headaches a hand-based method might cause for very enthusiastic talkers, among other possible hiccups, so don't be surprised if Project Glass goes without any kind of ring input. That said, we suspect that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/18/kinect-meets-a-pufferfish-display-produces-wonderfully-creepy-a/">Sauron</a> would approve.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/">Google patent application could give Project Glass one true ring controller to rule them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 May 2012 12:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20240447/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/google-patent-application-could-give-project-glass-a-ring-controller/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bracelet</category><category>bracelets</category><category>controller</category><category>finger nail</category><category>finger nails</category><category>FingerNail</category><category>fingernails</category><category>gesture</category><category>gestures</category><category>google</category><category>google project glass</category><category>GoogleProjectGlass</category><category>hand gesture</category><category>hand gestures</category><category>HandGesture</category><category>HandGestures</category><category>heads up display</category><category>heads-up display</category><category>Heads-upDisplay</category><category>HeadsUpDisplay</category><category>HUD</category><category>infrared</category><category>ir</category><category>liberace</category><category>Lord of the Rings</category><category>LordOfTheRings</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>patent filing</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>PatentFiling</category><category>patents</category><category>Project Glass</category><category>ProjectGlass</category><category>ring</category><category>ring controller</category><category>RingController</category><category>sauron</category><category>USPTO</category><category>wearable computer</category><category>wearable computing</category><category>WearableComputer</category><category>WearableComputing</category><category>wearables</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple, HTC ordered by judge to sit down, try and make nice on August 28th]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/"><img alt="HTC's Cher Wang at Apple Store" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/11x05231eddrgh.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> There's a trend starting to emerge of judges wanting Apple to<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/"> talk settlements with others</a> rather than duke it out in the courtroom. Just two weeks after Apple and Samsung were steered towards talking about a potential deal, a Delaware court has ordered Apple and HTC to meet on August 28th in the hopes that they could shake hands and put an end to an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/16/htc-drags-on-the-patent-war-files-yet-another-complaint-against/">increasingly hectic legal battle</a> under the eyes of a mediating judge. Whether or not that happens is very much up in the air. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said he's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/24/tim-cook-hates-litigation-not-quite-ready-to-call-a-patent-truc/">not a fan of lawsuits</a>, but he hasn't showed indications that he would take legal action off the table just yet. Likewise, HTC is no doubt eager to eliminate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/htc-one-x-and-evo-4g-lte-delayed-at-customs-due-to-itc-exclusio/">phone shipping delays</a> stemming from Apple's court wins, but the lack of immediate pressure and the hopes of winning countersuits might lead it to hold off. Still, if the court's ideal vision of the world comes to pass, you could see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/23/caption-contest-htc-chairwoman-cher-wang-drops-by-apples-palo/">HTC's Cher Wang shopping in an Apple Store</a> without staff giving her the evil eye.</p><p> [Image credit: <a href="http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=563&amp;t=2168501">mobile01</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/">Apple, HTC ordered by judge to sit down, try and make nice on August 28th</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 May 2012 16:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20240334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/apple-and-htc-ordered-by-judge-to-sit-down-in-mediation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agreement</category><category>android</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>court</category><category>courtroom</category><category>deal</category><category>deals</category><category>htc</category><category>iphone</category><category>judge</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>mediation</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>negotiation</category><category>negotiations</category><category>patent</category><category>Patent Dispute</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>settlement</category><category>settlements</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>talks</category><category>truce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google patent application could mean melody-matching for YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/"><img alt="Image" height="338" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/pomplamooseschmidt.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/16/mgm-delivers-600-movies-to-youtube-and-google-play/">YouTube</a> has become a treasure trove for rare <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/psa-watch-coachella-on-youtube-google-devices-for-free-this-we/">live editions</a>, outtakes and covers of popular songs -- the latter making stars out of acts like Pomplamoose. However, Google and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/umg-v-veoh-victory-has-never-been-so-pyrrhic/">recording industry</a> don't feel the same way, but the site's famous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/viacom-wins-appeal-against-youtube/">content filtering</a> system can only handle exact matches of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/youtube-wants-more-videos-to-have-background-music-adds-audio-e/">recorded songs</a> -- so that 14-year-old moppet's cover version of <em>Born this Way </em>remains unfiltered. That could change should a patent application made available today result in a workable product. It describes a Melody Identification system that'll pluck out a "melody fingerprint" from any uploaded file and then determine the appropriate "rights management" to apply -- which sounds ominous. The patents haven't been granted and nowhere in the text of either document does it reveal how the company plans to deal with songs that sound very, very similar, but we can't imagine what'll be left if the worst comes to pass: lots of mute cat videos, probably.</p><p> <strong>Update: </strong>Josh Rice in comments pointed out that Pomplamoose actually buys the rights to its covers. That's the nicest form of prior art there is.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/">Google patent application could mean melody-matching for YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 17 May 2012 13:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20239957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/17/google-melody-identification-patent-application/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Content Filtering</category><category>ContentFiltering</category><category>DRM</category><category>Google</category><category>Music</category><category>Music Publishers</category><category>MusicPublishers</category><category>Online Audio</category><category>Online Music</category><category>OnlineAudio</category><category>OnlineMusic</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>YouTube</category><category>YouTube Content Filter</category><category>YouTube Filter</category><category>YoutubeContentFilter</category><category>YoutubeFilter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sony applies for wireless power patent, wants to daisy-chain your energy]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/"><img alt="Sony wireless power patent" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/sony-wireless-power-patent.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 597px; height: 465px;" /></a></p><p> As much as we're familiar with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wirelesspower/">wireless power</a>, we know developing a truly contact-free form of charging has a whole raft of extra challenges, such as getting into the sweet spot for power delivery and the potential traffic jam caused by throwing another device into the mix. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sony/">Sony</a> thinks it has these problems licked through a newly-published patent application. Its method uses location-finding to steer users until they're close enough for the wireless power source to reliably do its job. In some cases, it can use one mobile device to relay power to another, keeping everything fed even if the main power hub is tied up. Multiple power sources next to each other can go so far as to decide which of them should be the one to send power. The patent isn't a certain sign that your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VAIO/">VAIO</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Xperia/">Xperia</a> is about to cut the cord altogether -- Sony first submitted this vision of the future in 2009. Even so, it gives us hope that our gadgets will one day start charging themselves instead of making us hunt down a wire or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/fulton-innovation-displays-wireless-power-within-your-handbag-i/">charging plate</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/">Sony applies for wireless power patent, wants to daisy-chain your energy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 21:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20238453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/sony-applies-for-wireless-power-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>contactless</category><category>contactless charging</category><category>contactless power</category><category>ContactlessCharging</category><category>ContactlessPower</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>SONY</category><category>USPTO</category><category>vaio</category><category>wireless charging</category><category>wireless power</category><category>WirelessCharging</category><category>WirelessPower</category><category>xperia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[RIM patent proposes battery-charging cellphone holster]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/bb.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 626px; height: 384px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> Even after the many announcements at this year's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Waterloo/">BlackBerry World Conference,</a> Waterloo is keeping that patent train a-rollin'. In a filing granted today, we get a glimpse of what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/rim/">RIM</a> could have up its sleeve, er, on its hip. The claims detail flexible batteries built into holsters that recharge your phone when you're on the go -- all the while communicating to your BB's CPU to bring you alerts through its own speakers -- thus avoiding muffled sounds from covered parts. That's all well and good, but here's the real question: will these things eventually play nice with fuel cell-powered <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/rim-patents-fuel-cell-manufacture-for-mobile-devices/">Berries</a>?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/">RIM patent proposes battery-charging cellphone holster</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 20:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20238343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/rim-blackberry-patent-cellphone-battery-charging-holster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10 dev alpha</category><category>10DevAlpha</category><category>bb</category><category>bbw</category><category>blackberry</category><category>cell phone holster</category><category>CellPhoneHolster</category><category>holster</category><category>patent</category><category>patent app</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApp</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>phone holster</category><category>PhoneHolster</category><category>RIM</category><category>uspto</category><category>waterloo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Verrecchio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Those suave Google glasses are now patent-protected]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/"><img alt="Those suave Google glasses are now patent-protected" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/project-glass-patent3.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 379px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></p><p> Google has successfully patented the "ornamental design" of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/project+glass/">augmented reality eyewear</a>. To you, me and Aunty Dee they might look almost like regular Ray-Bans, but there's a lot of secret technology concealed within those sleek lines and Google evidently wants to prevent others from copying their appearance. After all, if people started faking Project Glass, it'd be impossible to tell if we're being properly scanned or merely checked out.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/">Those suave Google glasses are now patent-protected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 06:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20238218/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/google-glasses-design-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appearance</category><category>ar</category><category>augmented reality</category><category>AugmentedReality</category><category>design patent</category><category>DesignPatent</category><category>fashion</category><category>glasses</category><category>google</category><category>google glasses</category><category>GoogleGlasses</category><category>patent</category><category>project glass</category><category>ProjectGlass</category><category>style</category><category>uspto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/"><img alt="Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/tab.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 399px;" /></a></p><p> We'll forgive you if you've forgotten, given the myriad <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple%2C+samsung%2C+lawsuit">Apple/Samsung</a> legal shenanigans, but back in February, Apple attempted to obtain a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/10/apple-seeks-injunction-against-samsung-in-california-with-newly/">preliminary injunction</a> against Samsung to prevent the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and a few phones from being sold in the US. Samsung emerged victorious, as the district court denied Cupertino's request because it questioned the validity of a couple of Apple's patents and didn't see how Apple would be irreparably harmed if it failed to get Sammy's products banned. Naturally, Tim Cook's crew appealed that decision, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has decided to give Apple another crack at obtaining an injunction. The CAFC upheld the lower court's ruling as to three of the four patents, but found fault with the District Court's holding that Apple's tablet design patent had substantial questions of validity.</p><p> Essentially, the lower court held that Apple's patent was likely no good because it was an obvious design in light of two tablets that were created long before Apple patented the iPad's look. However, the CAFC found that one of the previous slate's asymmetrical bezel and lack of an unbroken, all-glass surface (among other differences) were sufficient to render Apple's patent non-obvious. Basically, the appellate court found that the District court "construed the claimed design too broadly," and remanded the issue so that the district court could complete its preliminary injunction analysis. So, Apple's cleared a big hurdle towards getting the Galaxy Tab 10.1 off the US market, but the company's still got to persuade <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/">Judge Koh</a> that it'll be irreparably harmed without the injunction. This decision assures even longer legal proceedings, but given how well both of these <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/apple-samsung-99-percent-profits/">tech titans</a> are doing these days, we're pretty sure they can afford the attorneys' fees.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/">Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 May 2012 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/apple-gets-another-bite-wins-appeal-to-pursue-preliminary-injun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appeal</category><category>appeals</category><category>appeals court</category><category>AppealsCourt</category><category>apple</category><category>cafc</category><category>federal court</category><category>FederalCourt</category><category>galaxy tab 10.1</category><category>GalaxyTab10.1</category><category>injunction</category><category>ipad</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>preliminary injunction</category><category>PreliminaryInjunction</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA, Intellectual Ventures partner to acquire 4G patents from IPWireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/jv-patents.jpg" style="margin: 12px 16px; width: 300px; height: 135px; float: right;" /></a>It's hard to read the word 'patent' and not leap immediately to 'infringement,' given the tech industry's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Patent+Infringement/">recent track record</a>. But in this rare case, access to that oft-contested IP is being spread like love -- very expensive love. Under the terms of a joint agreement, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidia/">NVIDIA</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intellectual+ventures/">Intellectual Ventures</a> have acquired nearly 500 patents from IPWireless, some of which pertain to essential tech for LTE, LTE-Advanced and 3G / 4G, bolstering the duo's inroads into the mobile space. Though the exact financials weren't disclosed, IPWireless will retain the right to utilize that portfolio royalty-free for as long as it chooses, while NVIDIA will have to license whatever patents it didn't acquire from its partner. With official word of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/12/nvidia-confirms-no-project-grey-until-2013/">LTE Tegra 3</a> chips being pushed off into 2013, this latest business handshake's paving the way for an uncontested market debut. Check out the official PR after the break.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA, Intellectual Ventures partner to acquire 4G patents from IPWireless</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/">NVIDIA, Intellectual Ventures partner to acquire 4G patents from IPWireless</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 14 May 2012 13:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/nvidia-intellectual-ventures-partner-to-acquire-4g-patents-from/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4G</category><category>Intellectual Ventures</category><category>IntellectualVentures</category><category>IPWireless</category><category>joint agreement</category><category>joint partnership</category><category>JointAgreement</category><category>JointPartnership</category><category>LTE</category><category>lte advanced</category><category>LteAdvanced</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>NVIDIA</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Volpe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[RIM continues its fuel cell streak, applies for two more patents]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/"><img alt="RIM continues its fuel cell streak, applies for two more patents" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/rim-fuel-cell-patent-2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 500px; height: 312px;" /></a></p><p> Looks like RIM is more <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/rim-patents-fuel-cell-manufacture-for-mobile-devices/">interested in fuel cell technology</a> than we thought: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BlackBerry/">BlackBerry</a> maker has just applied for two closely related patents for including a fuel cell in an electronic device, one for the frame and one for the fuel tank itself. Although the primary aim of either patent is to show how to fit a fuel cell into the tight space of a mobile gadget, they do show a more rectangular and modern device chassis than the last patent we saw, which had more than a slight whiff of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/11/02/blackberry-8700-reviewed-by-ap/">classic BlackBerry</a> about it. Neither application is necessarily a roadmap for the future, and they don't mean your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/blackberry-london-resurfaces-in-leak-sports-matte-black-exterio/">next BlackBerry smartphone</a> will need top-ups of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/brookstone-fuel-cell-usb-charger-lasts-two-weeks/">lighter fluid</a> or methanol every few weeks. Still, they hint that fuel cells are at least somewhat more than a passing fancy in Waterloo.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/">RIM continues its fuel cell streak, applies for two more patents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 10 May 2012 22:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20235446/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/rim-applies-for-two-new-fuel-cell-patents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BlackBerry</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>Fuel Cell</category><category>fuel cells</category><category>FuelCell</category><category>FuelCells</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>patent filing</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>PatentFiling</category><category>patents</category><category>Research In Motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>RIM</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>us patent and trademark office</category><category>UsPatentAndTrademarkOffice</category><category>USPTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola files patent application for anti-smear display tech]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/"><img alt="Motorola anti-smear patent application" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/motorolapatent.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 209px;" /></a></p><p> Motorola's applied to patent a new display layer that aims to prevent all those smudges that inevitably accrue on our finger-friendly devices. A modern-day touchscreen problem for prim-and-proper types, the application solves it with several minute, raised layers across the surface of the device, with little reflective caveats to capture oils and other unwanted impurities, optically disguising them from your eyes. The layers wouldn't degrade compared to chemical coatings that could also get scratched off. In typical <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent+application">patent application </a>style, the wording's pretty hazy -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Motorola/">Motorola</a> could either be describing an add-on layer applied to the phone afterward or something already fused to the display. In the application's words:</p><blockquote> <p>  "A viewable surface of a device, and more particularly a viewable surface of an electronic device, and even more particularly a viewable surface of a transparent cover for a display in an electronic device, includes transparent pedestals projecting from the surface of the viewable surface, the pedestals having reflective sides that conceal, or suppress the appearance of, smudges on the viewable surface."</p></blockquote><p> For some more specifics on Motorola's smudge-disguising solution, you can peruse the official filing down at your local patents and trademark office -- or just hit up the source below.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/">Motorola files patent application for anti-smear display tech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 10 May 2012 19:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20235484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/motorola-patent-application-for-anti-smear-display-tech/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ant-smear</category><category>anti-smear</category><category>display</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>patents</category><category>screen</category><category>smearing</category><category>USPTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia loses UK appeal against IPCom's pointless patent posturing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/"><img alt="Image" height="425" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nokiahq.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="566" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/lumia-900-uk-release/">Nokia</a> has had its appeal dismissed in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/30/UK-isps-block-pirate-bay/">UK High Court</a> in its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/20/nokias-ipcom-patent-case/">Europe-wide</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/european-patent-office-invalidates-ipcom-3g-patent-gives-good-n/">patent battle</a> against <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/25/ipcom-to-enforce-injunction-against-htc-ban-sales-of-its-3g-dev/">IPCom</a>. The court found that the handset maker had infringed the German firm's 3G patent, but only on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/the-nokia-n96-redefines-high-end/">Nokia N96</a> -- a phone the company no longer sells. IPCom can now request a ban on all British sales of the 2008 handset, a move that will probably affect <em>tens</em> of people. We've got an official response from Nokia's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/apple-ready-to-license-its-nano-sim-design-for-free/">Mark Durrant</a> after the break.</p><p> [Image credit: <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2a/Nokia_HQ.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a>]</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nokia loses UK appeal against IPCom's pointless patent posturing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/">Nokia loses UK appeal against IPCom's pointless patent posturing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 10 May 2012 06:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20235315/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/nokia-loses-ipcom-uk-appeal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Finland</category><category>Germany</category><category>High Court</category><category>HighCourt</category><category>Infringement</category><category>IPCom</category><category>Mark Durrant</category><category>MarkDurrant</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Nokia N96</category><category>NokiaN96</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Licensing</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLicensing</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Patents</category><category>UK High Court</category><category>UkHighCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 06:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[RIM patents trapezoidal BlackBerry keyboards for slanty-thumbed texters]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/"><img alt="ImageRIM patents trapezoidal BlackBerry keyboards for slanty-thumbed texters" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/rimkeyboard.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 400px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/blackberry-10-dev-alpha-hands-on/">RIM</a> is utterly devoted to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/rim-dont-worry-blackberry-10-devices-with-keyboards-are-on-th/">physical keyboard</a>, but how do you deal with sausage-fingered emailers who can't pick out individual keys? Thanks to this newly-granted 2009 patent, the company has the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/blackberry-phones-could-get-rhythm-to-unlock/">solution</a> -- a trapezoidal keyboard designed to offer easier access of type-weary thumbs and wider keys for better accuracy. We hope that in a windowless office in Waterloo, some engineer will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/rim-phone-dock-patent-app/">combine elements</a> from all this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/rim-patent-application-describes-rotating-keypad-that-can-be-use/">patenting activity</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/05/rim-patent-filing-reveals-hybrid-capacitive-resistive-touchscr/">come up</a> with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/rim-patent-adjusting-volume-ear-distance-design/">next generation</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/14/rim-patents-fuel-cell-manufacture-for-mobile-devices/">mobile telephone</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/">RIM patents trapezoidal BlackBerry keyboards for slanty-thumbed texters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 May 2012 07:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20234364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/rim-angled-keyboard-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BlackBerry</category><category>BlackBerry patent</category><category>BlackberryPatent</category><category>Canada</category><category>Keyboard</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patents</category><category>Physical Keyboard</category><category>PhysicalKeyboard</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIM Patent</category><category>RimPatent</category><category>Trapezoid</category><category>Trapezoidal</category><category>Trapezoidal Keyboard</category><category>TrapezoidalKeyboard</category><category>USPTO</category><category>Waterloo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft patent details pressure-sensitive Xbox controller for storing players' profiles]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/"><img alt="Microsoft patent details pressure-sensitive Xbox controller for storing players' profiles" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/screen-shot-2012-05-08-at-10.59.04-am.png" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 643px; height: 399px; " /></a></p><p> Biometrics and laptop security go together like business meetings and boardrooms, but this Microsoft patent hints that gaming could be the next frontier for fingerprint recognition. The claims for "personalization using a hand-pressure signature" detail a product that may look like your standard <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xbox+controller/">360 controller</a>, but it features sensors to detect a user's identity. It seems that, based on each gamer's unique hand pressure patterns, the controller can determine who is holding the device at any given moment and deliver personalized content based on that user's gaming profile. Whatever Microsoft's mystery controller may be, E3 is just a few weeks away, so perhaps we'll learn more then.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/">Microsoft patent details pressure-sensitive Xbox controller for storing players' profiles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 May 2012 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20233782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-patent-details-pressure-sensitive-xbox-controller/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biometrics</category><category>controller</category><category>controllers</category><category>fingerprint sensor</category><category>FingerprintSensor</category><category>gaming controller</category><category>gaming controllers</category><category>GamingController</category><category>GamingControllers</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>microsoft patent</category><category>microsoft patents</category><category>MicrosoftPatent</category><category>MicrosoftPatents</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>pressure sensor</category><category>PressureSensor</category><category>USPTO</category><category>xbox</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox 360 controller</category><category>xbox controller</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Xbox360Controller</category><category>XboxController</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Silbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-samsung-reduce-patent-claims/"><img alt="Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/2782479341398995911813501433279534807839n.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 398px;" /></a></p><p> Last week, Judge Lucy Koh informed Apple and Samsung that they would have to reduce the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">number of patent claims</a> at issue in the parties' Northern District of California litigation. And now, each has complied, with Samsung dropping its total number of asserted patent claims from 75 to 15, while dismissing two patents from the case altogether. For its part, Apple has reduced its case to one claim from each of its asserted utility patents, its four iPhone and one iPad design patents, and its trade dress claims for those two devices. Keep in mind, however, that they did so without prejudice, which means that either party can reassert these dismissed claims in a later lawsuit. That said, the parties have at least attempted to placate Judge Koh in order to keep their July 30th trial date, which is when the real legal fireworks begin. Feel free to check the filings below for the full scope of this most recent patent pruning.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/">Apple and Samsung finally agree... to drop a plethora of claims from their patent spat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 May 2012 13:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20233937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-and-samsung-finally-agree-to-drop-a-plethora-of-claims-fr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>claims</category><category>infringement</category><category>judge lucy koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>patent</category><category>patent claims</category><category>patent infringement</category><category>PatentClaims</category><category>PatentInfringement</category><category>patents</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Xamarin's XobotOS opens prospect of Android port to C#, can of worms]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/"><img alt="Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp" height="400" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/android-c-05-04-12-01.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> Would it be ironic if Android developers did an end-run around <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/pegatron-licenses-microsofts-patent-porfolio-for-android-and-ch/">Microsoft patents</a> by using Microsoft's own C#? Or if Google kiboshed its Oracle <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/">brouhaha</a> with the aid of none other than Redmond? We're asking because Xamarin, the wacky open source implementer of .NET, has ported Android to Microsoft's C# with its XobotOS project. Although just an experiment and unlikely to solve Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/">issues</a>, the team showed that running the robot on C# instead of Java gave fewer coding limitations, better battery life and direct graphics access. Additionally, Xamarin reports "massive" speed gains on its HTC Flyer and Acer Iconia when running the side-project port -- no surprise given C#'s machine heritage. Sure, it's pure speculation that Mountain View and its developers would ever change their Java MO, but a little patent relief and faster Android devices in one kill shot? That's a sweet idea.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/">Xamarin's XobotOS opens prospect of Android port to C#, can of worms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 16:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/Xamarin-XobotOS-ports-Android-to-C-Sharp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>business</category><category>c</category><category>C Sharp</category><category>CSharp</category><category>dalvik</category><category>dev</category><category>developer</category><category>developers</category><category>google</category><category>hack</category><category>hacks</category><category>java</category><category>java dalvik</category><category>JavaDalvik</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>microsoft</category><category>oracle</category><category>OS</category><category>patent</category><category>patent deal</category><category>PatentDeal</category><category>port</category><category>ports</category><category>software</category><category>xamarin</category><category>xobot</category><category>xobotOS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung biological analysis patent app has your best heart at interest]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/"><img alt="Samsung biological analysis patent app has your best heart at interest " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/sammymediadfaffdg.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 616px; height: 260px;" /></a></p><p> In <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent,application">Patent-application-land</a>, the hills roll on forever, while buttercups gently ripple with the breeze. Anything is possible in Patent-application-land. In this particular filling, Samsung lays out some ideas about helping you to keep your health in check. An "internet phone" and a "biological analysis device" would combine to send your vitals off to a diagnosis server, hospital or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/sony-dr-tv-patent/">remote doctor</a>. There's also a provision for the use of "biochips," which we hope refers to a data gathering medium, and not a half-time snack. While we're not sure if this was a precursor to the freshly announced <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-launches-new-services-for-the-galaxy-s-iii-music-hub-s/">S-health service</a>, if this ever came to be, at least you wouldn't need to leave the house to get that agoraphobia diagnosis.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/">Samsung biological analysis patent app has your best heart at interest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 14:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230720/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/samsung-biological-analysis-patent-app-has-your-best-heart-at-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>application</category><category>biochip</category><category>biological analysis device</category><category>BiologicalAnalysisDevice</category><category>medical</category><category>patent</category><category>patent app</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApp</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>remote doctor</category><category>RemoteDoctor</category><category>samsung</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nintendo patent application tech tracks your DS from above, serves as tour guide]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nintendo-position-patent.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 458px; height: 465px;" /></a></p><p> Nintendo is already guiding you <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/3ds-louvre/">through the Louvre</a> with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/21/nintendo-3ds-review/">3DS</a>, but a newly published US patent application takes that kind of tourism to a very literal new level. <em>Legend of Zelda</em> creator Shigeru Miyamoto's concept describes a way to direct lost tourists by beaming position information through an overhead grid of infrared transmitters to a mobile device (portrayed as a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DSLite/">DS Lite</a>) held by the confused visitor below. The handheld then talks wirelessly to a server that lights up floor displays with maps and directions, and a helpful app on the device lets visitors pick their route while they read up on sightseeing tips. Like with any patent, there's no certainty that Nintendo will act on the idea and start wiring up museums with IR blasters, but the January 2012 patent may still be fresh in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/14/shigeru-miyamoto-profiled-legendary-game-designer-interior-dec/">frequently inventive</a> mind like Miyamoto's.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/">Nintendo patent application tech tracks your DS from above, serves as tour guide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-ds-position-patent-application/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3ds</category><category>Application</category><category>ds</category><category>infrared</category><category>infrared sensor</category><category>InfraredSensor</category><category>Louvre</category><category>map</category><category>maps</category><category>Miyamoto</category><category>navigation</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendo 3ds</category><category>Nintendo DS</category><category>Nintendo3ds</category><category>NintendoDs</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>shigeru miyamoto</category><category>ShigeruMiyamoto</category><category>tourism</category><category>tourist</category><category>us patent and trademark office</category><category>UsPatentAndTrademarkOffice</category><category>USPTO</category><category>wi-fi</category><category>wifi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nintendo patent application lends a look at Wii U's core technology, add-ons too]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nintendo-wii-u-patent-gun.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 552px; height: 452px;" /></a></p><p> Little did we know that, just two months after we were <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/07/nintendo-wii-u-controller-first-hands-on/">trying the Wii U</a> for ourselves, Nintendo was busy patenting nearly everything its unique game console would have to offer. A pair of just-published US Patent Office applications filed last August get into the nuts and bolts of how the controller and the legacy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Wiiremote/">Wii remote</a> will play with the new device. It's clear that the patent work had started before Nintendo had redesigned the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/07/nintendo-wii-u-console-eyes-on/">main system</a> -- the box at the center of the patents looks like the existing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Wii/">Wii</a> -- but it does show the nitty-gritty of things we only saw at last year's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/07/live-from-nintendos-e3-2011-keynote/">Nintendo E3 keynote</a>, such as the gun attachment or playing golf with a combination of the Wii U controller and the traditional Wiimote. Nintendo also gave itself some wiggle room on the controller's screen size: although the LCD is officially 6.2 inches across, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent/">patent</a> allows that it might be "5 inches or larger." We're wondering how much of the overall look and technology will survive through to the finished Wii U design's unveiling at this year's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/E3/">E3</a>. For now, though, you can explore the patents yourself at the links below.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/">Nintendo patent application lends a look at Wii U's core technology, add-ons too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 May 2012 00:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230300/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/nintendo-applies-for-wii-u-patents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>attachment</category><category>console</category><category>consoles</category><category>controller</category><category>controllers</category><category>e3</category><category>e3 2012</category><category>E32012</category><category>game</category><category>golf</category><category>gun</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendo wii</category><category>nintendo wii u</category><category>NintendoWii</category><category>NintendoWiiU</category><category>patent</category><category>patents</category><category>USPTO</category><category>video game</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGame</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>Wii</category><category>wii remote</category><category>wii u</category><category>Wiimote</category><category>WiiRemote</category><category>WiiU</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Patent application highlights Apple's continued flirtation with haptic feedback]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/"><img alt="Image" height="289" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/apple-haptic-patent-5-12.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="547" /></a></p><p> We could all use a little feedback, right? Even Apple. The company has been toying around with the concept of haptic feedback for a while now, at least so far as patent applications are concerned. Another application filed in November or 2010 has surfaced. Of course, what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/02/apple-patent-applications-offer-glimpses-of-haptic-screens-rfid/">we told you back in 2009</a> about the tenuous connection between an application and an actual product is as relevant as ever. Still, Apple's concept for a "tiered haptic system" which "may use one or more arrays of shape change elements to provide a wide range of tactile feedback" demonstrates that, at least as of late 2010, Cupertino was still working to rethink the way it sees touchscreens.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/">Patent application highlights Apple's continued flirtation with haptic feedback</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 May 2012 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20230225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/patent-application-highlights-apples-continued-flirtation-with/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>haptic</category><category>haptic feedback</category><category>HapticFeedback</category><category>patent</category><category>patent application</category><category>PatentApplication</category><category>touch</category><category>touchscreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Heater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple v. Samsung judge yells 'get to the point, you two']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/stopinthenameofapple-1323372041.jpg" style="margin: 4px 10px; width: 156px; height: 200px; float: right;" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Judge+Lucy+Koh/">Judge Lucy Koh</a>, presiding over the courtroom battle 'twixt <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/apple-v-samsung-cupertinos-latest-complaint-alleges-17-device/">Apple and Samsung</a> has ordered that both companies slim down the bundle of litigation so its easy for juries to understand. The docket currently contains <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/samsung-frand-patents/">16 patent violations</a>, six trademark issues, five "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/did-apple-alter-photos-of-the-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-in-its-inj/">trade dress</a>" claims and an antitrust matter -- which her Honor Judge Koh described as a "cruel and unusual punishment" for a jury. If both companies can't get <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/apple-and-samsung-ceos-set-to-sit-down-attempt-to-settle-disput/">over a table</a> and produce a Cliffs Notes edition of their global patent battle, then she'll postpone the trial date until 2013.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/">Apple v. Samsung judge yells 'get to the point, you two'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 May 2012 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20229964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/lucy-koh-kicks-ass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Antitrust</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple V. Samsung</category><category>AppleV.Samsung</category><category>Courtroom</category><category>Judge Lucy Koh</category><category>JudgeLucyKoh</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Lucy Koh</category><category>LucyKoh</category><category>Northern District of California</category><category>NorthernDistrictOfCalifornia</category><category>Patent</category><category>Patent Litigation</category><category>PatentLitigation</category><category>Patents</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung v. Apple</category><category>SamsungV.Apple</category><category>Trade Dress</category><category>TradeDress</category><category>Trademark</category><category>Trademark Litigation</category><category>TrademarkLitigation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 10:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
