<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Live from Intel's CES 2012 press event]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/cesliveblog0327.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Intel has already held one epic event filled with sweet, gadget fun at this year's Consumer Electronics Show -- but the party isn't over yet. Now it's time for the company's top dog, Paul Otellini, to take the stage and deliver his 2012 keynote. Presumably we'll be getting a healthy dose of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a> and a heaping-helping of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/leaked-intel-roadmap-hints-at-ivy-bridges-future/">Ivy Bridge</a>. So what does the future of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/07/intel-springs-another-leak-mobile-ivy-bridge-cpus-abound/">laptops</a>, desktops and tablets hold? And what does Intel envision for our computing future? Follow along with us to find out.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Live from Intel's CES 2012 press event</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/">Live from Intel's CES 2012 press event</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20145584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-intels-ces-2012-press-event/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CES</category><category>CES 2012</category><category>Ces2012</category><category>engadget stage</category><category>EngadgetStage</category><category>Intel</category><category>keynote</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel demos Haswell-enabled, solar-powered computing at IDF 2011]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarpanellead.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<div>
	During the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IDF/">IDF</a> keynote today in San Francisco, Intel demoed a solar-powered PC running Windows based on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/16/leaked-intel-slides-reveal-8-core-cpus-avx-instruction-set/">long-teased Haswell microarchitecture</a> -- complete with labcoats and LOLcats. As a refresher, Haswell is based on the same 22nm technology as Ivy Bridge, reduces power by 20x compared to current designs, and will help Ultrabooks achieve <em>ten days</em> of connected standby by 2013. Intel's CEO Paul Otellini mentioned that Haswell will further accelerate Ultrabook innovation with the help of the company's revolutionary <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/04/intel-will-mass-produce-22nm-3d-transistors-for-all-future-cpus/">3D tri-gate transistors</a>. Check out the solar-powered future in our gallery below.<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/">Intel's Haswell solar-powered computer at IDF</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/#4442252"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarcomputer01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/#4442260"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarcomputer09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/#4442257"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarcomputer06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/#4442256"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarcomputer05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-haswell-solar-powered-computer-at-idf-0/#4442253"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/solarcomputer02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
	<em>Dante Cesa contributed to this report.</em></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel demos Haswell-enabled, solar-powered computing at IDF 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/">Intel demos Haswell-enabled, solar-powered computing at IDF 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20041706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/intel-demos-haswell-enabled-solar-powered-computing-at-idf-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D transistor</category><category>3dTransistor</category><category>cpu</category><category>haswell</category><category>IDF</category><category>IDF 2011</category><category>Idf2011</category><category>Intel Haswell</category><category>Intel Haswell Ultrabook</category><category>Intel Ultrabook</category><category>IntelHaswell</category><category>IntelHaswellUltrabook</category><category>IntelUltrabook</category><category>microarchitecture</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>PC</category><category>processor</category><category>solar-powered</category><category>Ultrabook</category><category>Windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriam Joire]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/dantemedfieldintel.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Google's Andy Rubin just came up on stage here at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IDF+2011/">IDF</a> keynote, joining Intel CEO Paul Otellini who was holding a bona fide <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a>-powered smartphone running Android 2.3 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Gingerbread/">Gingerbread</a>)! Hard to be sure, but the device looks eerily like the Aava Mobile handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/03/aava-mobile-reportedly-set-to-reveal-medfield-based-android-me/">we've seen before</a>. The cameo was part of a much larger initiative, which will see Intel working concurrently with Google in order to optimize future processors for use with Android. We were actually tipped off on this <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/intel-reveals-january-2012-gingerbread-arrival-for-the-atom-e6xx/">a few days back</a>, but at the time, it was difficult to tell how much of a consumer impact it'd have. Given Andy's showing, though, it's looking better and better in that regard. The most impressive tidbit, however, is the promise that all future Android builds will be "optimized" for Intel's low-power Atom clan. We've compiled a gallery for you below, and hopefully we'll have a hands-on later today.<br />
	<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/">Intel's Medfield based Android smartphone</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442020"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442019"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/untitled-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442017"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/medfield_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-medfield-based-android-smartphone/#4442016"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/img8595_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
	<em>Dante Cesa contributed to this report</em>.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/">Medfield-based Android phone shown at IDF 2011, future Android builds to be 'optimized' for Atom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20041705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/13/andy-rubin-shows-off-medfield-based-android-phone-at-idf-2011-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aava Mobile</category><category>AavaMobile</category><category>android</category><category>android 2.3</category><category>Android2.3</category><category>Andy Rubin</category><category>AndyRubin</category><category>breaking news</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>idf</category><category>idf 2011</category><category>Idf2011</category><category>intel</category><category>intel medfield</category><category>IntelMedfield</category><category>medfield</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>Paul Ottellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>PaulOttellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriam Joire]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel goes ULV for laptops to combat the oncoming tablet horde]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/"><img alt="Intel CPU" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/5-20-2011intel.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a>Intel has been talking up its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/">x86-powered smartphones</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/next-next-gen-atom-will-be-a-system-on-a-chip-called-silvermont/">battery-sipping Atoms</a> for tablets quite a bit recently, but the company hasn't forgotten its roots in traditional PC form-factors. At an investor event in San Francisco, CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/paul+otellini/">Paul Otellini</a> announced a significant change to its line of notebook CPUs -- ultra low voltage will be the new norm, not just a niche chip for high-end ultra-portables. The baseline TDP for future CPUs will be in the 10 to 15 watt range, a huge drop from the 35w design of the mainstream Core line and lower than even current-gen ULV chips (which bottom out at 17w). The company also plans to make NVIDIA <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">eat its words</a> by putting the pedal to the metal on die shrinks -- releasing a 22nm Atom next year followed by a 14nm version in 2013. That <em>could</em> mean our fantasy of true all-day battery life in a sleek and sexy laptop will finally come true. Don't crush our dreams Intel!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/">Intel goes ULV for laptops to combat the oncoming tablet horde</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 20 May 2011 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19945778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/20/intel-goes-ulv-for-laptops-to-combat-the-oncoming-tablet-horde/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nm</category><category>22nm</category><category>atom</category><category>cpu</category><category>cpus</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>moores law</category><category>MooresLaw</category><category>notebook</category><category>notebooks</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>roadmap</category><category>ultra-low voltage</category><category>Ultra-lowVoltage</category><category>ulv</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/medfield-phone-01-31-2011.jpg" /></a></div>
After Intel's early <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/intel-demos-iphone-like-mid-of-the-future/">smartphone</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/05/intel-reaches-for-the-smartphone-zone-with-moorestown-based-at/">ambitions</a> failed to bear fruit, experiencing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">delay</a> after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">delay</a>, the company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">seemingly decided</a> it'd be a bad idea to give reporters so much as a ballpark release date. Well, the company's confidence must have returned, because CEO Paul Otellini just told investors that those 32nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Medfield/">Medfield</a> smartphones are indeed on the way. "You'll see the first Intel-based phones in the first part of next year," he said at the company's annual investor meeting today, adding later that there will be "phones shipping in the market from major players" at that time. Here's hoping.<br />
<br />
Why all the delays? Intel blamed its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/intel-and-nokia-officially-partner-on-mobile-devices-the-possi/">partnership with Nokia</a>, calling it a mistake. "In hindsight, Nokia was the wrong partner to have picked," said Otellini, but told attendees that the time both companies spent working together won't be wasted entirely: Intel is currently shopping around their co-developed handset as a reference design.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/">Intel promises smartphones in 'first part of next year,' we put fingers in our ears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19942869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/17/intel-promises-smartphones-in-first-part-of-next-year-we-put/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>Intel</category><category>Medfield</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>phone</category><category>reference design</category><category>ReferenceDesign</category><category>smartphone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel porting Honeycomb to its tablets, Medfield smartphones on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/android-honeycomb-logo-intel-buzz-small.jpg" /></a></div>
Corporate earnings calls can be tedious affairs. But sometimes, if you listen closely enough, you'll be treated to a nugget of product strategy in between those bursts of mind-numbing financial data. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/19/intel-shocks-everyone-including-itself-with-record-q1-earnings/">Intel's call</a> was just such an affair, with chief Paul S. Otellini providing a quick update on Intel's tablet and smartphone plans. Regarding the emerging tablet market, Otellini said that Intel will have "quite a bit of tablet demonstrations" at Computex <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/intel-rolls-out-atom-z670-oak-trail-processor-for-tablets/">running MeeGo, Windows, and Android</a> operating systems. "We're heads down on a number of designs on tablets on all three of those operating systems," he added. Regarding Android, Intel's fifth CEO said, "We've received Android code - the Honeycomb version of Android source code - from Google, and we're actively doing the port on that, and expect to be able to ramp those machines over the course of this year for a number of customers." Yes, we're looking at you right now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/acer-building-sandy-bridge-tablets-for-android-will-use-them-to/">Acer -- wink, wink</a>. <br />
<br />
Regarding smarpthones, Otellini told reporters and analysts, "In terms of phones, obviously, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/">we lost Nokia</a>, which took a lot of the wind out of the sails for phones this year. We've redirected those resources onto a number of other major accounts focusing on carriers who want their own devices and also own handset manufacturers. They are all based on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/intel-talks-medfield-will-ship-in-a-phone-will-have-longest-us/">Medfield</a>." With regards to timing, Otellini observed, "The limit in terms of them getting to market is going to be the interoperability testing of the networks at this point in time. I would be very disappointed if we didn't see Intel-based phones for sale 12 months from now." Us too Paul, us too... <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/18/samsung-promises-a-dual-core-2ghz-smartphone-by-next-year/">ARM's not exactly standing still</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/">Intel porting Honeycomb to its tablets, Medfield smartphones on the way</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19918507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/20/intel-porting-honeycomb-to-tablets-laments-loss-of-nokia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 3.0</category><category>Android3.0</category><category>google</category><category>honeycomb</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>meego</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>smartphone</category><category>strategy</category><category>tablet</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel to spend $5 billion on new 14nm fab in Arizona, create 4,000 new jobs this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/11x021987gh3intel.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
When Paul Otellini isn't too busy <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/">talking about being jilted by Nokia</a>, he spends his time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/">hosting presidents</a> and splashing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/19/intel-announces-plans-to-spend-up-to-8-billion-on-u-s-factory/">billions of dollars</a> on new manufacturing facilities. Intel's CEO is wrapping his tumultuous week on a high note, having welcomed Barack Obama to Chipzilla's Oregon facility and treated the president to the happy news that Intel will invest $5 billion back into the US economy by building its most advanced fab yet -- which will introduce an impossibly small 14nm production process -- in Arizona, to begin operation in 2013. Construction starts in the middle of this year and is expected to create "thousands" of jobs, both temporary and permanent. Aside from that, Otellini has disclosed Intel's intention to create 4,000 new jobs in the US, mostly in R&amp;D and product development. Music to Obama's ears, we're sure.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel to spend $5 billion on new 14nm fab in Arizona, create 4,000 new jobs this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/">Intel to spend $5 billion on new 14nm fab in Arizona, create 4,000 new jobs this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19851779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-to-spend-5-billion-on-new-14nm-fab-in-arizona-creating-4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14nm</category><category>300mm</category><category>arizona</category><category>building</category><category>chip</category><category>chips</category><category>component</category><category>components</category><category>construction</category><category>cpu</category><category>employment</category><category>fab</category><category>fab 42</category><category>Fab42</category><category>fabrication</category><category>facilities</category><category>factory</category><category>industry</category><category>intel</category><category>investment</category><category>jobs</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>nanoscale</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>processor</category><category>processors</category><category>production</category><category>semiconductor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel CEO Paul Otellini flip-flops, says he 'would've gone Android' if he were Elop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/intel-spacesuits.jpg" /></a></div>
It's hard to say if Intel CEO Paul Otellini was simply misquoted the first go 'round, or if he really had a change of heart in the course of 48 hours. Either way, the most recent quotes coming from the highest of highs at Chipzilla paints a very different story than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/">the one we first heard</a>, and it's beginning to look like Intel and Microsoft may eventually wage some sort of war -- even if it's one that remains strictly at the software level. <em>Reuters</em> is reporting that <span id="articleText">Otellini had this to say when questioned about Stephen Elop's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/the-engadget-interview-nokia-ceo-stephen-elop-talks-microsoft/">decision</a> to select Windows Phone 7 as the future of Nokia's handset business:</span><br />
<blockquote>
<div><em><span id="articleText"> "</span><span id="articleText">I wouldn't have made the decision he made, I would probably have gone to Android if I were him. </span><span id="articleText">MeeGo would have been the best strategy but he concluded he couldn't afford it."</span></em><span id="articleText"><br />
</span></div>
</blockquote><span id="articleText">  That contrasts starkly with comments made just days ago, where he was quoted as saying that he would've made "the same or a similar call" if found in Elop's shoes. Continuing on the topic of differentiation, </span><span id="articleText">Otellini noted that "i</span><span id="articleText">t would have been less hard on Android, [but] on MeeGo he could have done it." That said, he's confident that Intel "will find another partner," noting that carriers "</span><span id="articleText">still want a third ecosystem and the carriers want an open ecosystem, and that's the thing that drives our motivation." Now, the real question: which Paul can be believed?<br />
</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/">Intel CEO Paul Otellini flip-flops, says he 'would've gone Android' if he were Elop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 19 Feb 2011 06:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19851427/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/19/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-flip-flops-says-he-wouldve-gone-andro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>ceo</category><category>google</category><category>intel</category><category>meego</category><category>microkia</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>nokia</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>software</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 06:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama talked R&amp;D with tech industry CEOs, appoints Intel's Paul Otellini to advisory council]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/"><img border="1" align="right" vspace="16" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/obama-ceo-meeting-02-18-2011.jpg" /></a>Sure, there may have been some toasts and likely a bit of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/caption-contest-obama-has-dinner-with-tech-industry-ceos-need/">joking</a>, but it looks like President Obama also got down to a bit of business during his meeting with some of the tech industry's top CEOs yesterday. While complete details are obviously light, White House press secretary Jay Carney has revealed that the president raised the issue of his recent proposals to invest in research and development with the group, and he's said to have also discussed ways to encourage kids to study math, science and engineering. What's more, as the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> points out, President Obama isn't done with the tech industry just yet -- he's moved on to Oregon today to tour one of Intel's semiconductor plants, where's expected to announce that Intel CEO Paul Otellini will be joining his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/">Obama talked R&amp;D with tech industry CEOs, appoints Intel's Paul Otellini to advisory council</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19850169/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/18/obama-talked-randd-with-tech-industry-ceos-appoints-intels-paul/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>meeting</category><category>obama</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>Presidents Council on Jobs and Competitiveness</category><category>PresidentsCouncilOnJobsAndCompetitiveness</category><category>rd</category><category>white house</category><category>WhiteHouse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Otellini insists company is committed to MeeGo, says he 'understood' why Nokia moved to Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/02-14-11meegoad.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">We've already seen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/editorial-intel-keeps-pushing-meego-but-why/">some evidence</a> that Intel was still pushing strongly ahead with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/meego">MeeGo</a> despite Nokia's deal with Microsoft, and now CEO Paul Otellini has chimed in on the matter to reassure folks that the company is still committed to the mobile OS. Speaking with <em>Bloomberg</em> at Mobile World Congress this week, Otellini said that he doesn't see that "Nokia changing its strategy changes the industry strategy," and added that "operators still look for an open, operator-friendly operating system." Otellini further went on to say on a panel discussion that he "understood" why Nokia made the decision it did, and even said that if he were in the same position he would have made "the same or a similar call." That doesn't mean he wasn't disappointed by it though -- in fact, he revealed that he used a word that Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz "has often used" when he first received the news from Stephen Elop himself (we'll let you look that up if you don't know it).</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/">Intel's Otellini insists company is committed to MeeGo, says he 'understood' why Nokia moved to Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19846724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/16/intels-otellini-insists-company-is-committed-to-meego-says-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>meego</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mwc</category><category>mwc 2011</category><category>Mwc2011</category><category>nokia</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel CEO Paul Otellini addresses Microsoft's ARM move in the wake of record earnings announcement]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/"><img width="600" height="400" vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/ces2011boothtours.jpg" /></a></div>
We're kind of getting used to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel,earnings">Intel setting records with its earnings</a> this year, and it capped off its 2010 with another killer quarter. With $11.5 billion in revenue, and a total of $43.6 billion for the year (up 24 percent from last year), Intel is naturally riding high. There's danger lurking on the horizon, however, with Microsoft announcing at CES that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/08/editorial-windows-on-arm-is-a-big-deal-but-its-not-enough-to/">next version of Windows will also run on ARM chips</a>, potentially ending a decades-long x86 dominance in the desktop OS space. Naturally, the topic came up in the earnings call, and here's Intel CEO Paul Otellini's level-headed statement on the topic:<br />
<blockquote>
<div>The plus for Intel is that as they unify their operating systems we now have the ability for the first time, one, to have a designed-from-scratch, touch-enabled operating system for tablets that runs on Intel that we don't have today; and, secondly, we have the ability to put our lowest-power Intel processors, running Windows 8 or the next generation of Windows, into phones, because it's the same OS stack. And I look at that as an upside opportunity for us.<br />
<br />
On the downside, there's the potential, given that Office runs on these products, for some creep-up coming into the PC space. I am skeptical of that for two reasons: one, that space has a different set of power and performance requirements where Intel is exceptionally good; and secondly, users of those machines expect legacy support for software and peripherals that has to all be enabled from scratch for those devices.</div>
</blockquote>After careful analysis of Paul's voice, we couldn't detect any hints of panic or fear in it, and we buy about 50+ percent of what he's putting down -- a lot better than we expected, to be honest. It's very interesting that he sees the new version of Windows being a "designed-from-scratch, touch-enabled operating system for tablets," and the idea of Windows Phone running on regular Windows is also news to us -- though it certainly makes plenty of sense in the long run (and perhaps <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/23/ballmer-next-release-of-windows-will-be-microsofts-riskiest-p/">Ballmer has been hinting at it</a>). Still, Intel has just as much of a disadvantage making a phone processor as ARM guys have a disadvantage at making high-powered PC processors, and when it comes to legacy support, they'll at least be on pretty equal footing when it comes to a "designed-from-scratch" tablet OS. No matter what, Intel certainly has a great roadmap and a ton of cash right now, so we look forward to a fair CPU fight on all sides of the form factor coin.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/">Intel CEO Paul Otellini addresses Microsoft's ARM move in the wake of record earnings announcement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19800739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/intel-ceo-paul-otellini-addresses-microsofts-arm-move-in-the-wa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arm</category><category>intel</category><category>microsoft</category><category>otellini</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>tablets</category><category>windows</category><category>windows phone</category><category>windows phone 7</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone7</category><category>x86</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Otellini says 35 Atom-based tablets coming in 2011, but smartphones get pushed back (again)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/12-08-10inteltabs.jpg" /></a></div>
It's been a long, hard road for Intel in the mobile space, but it looks like things are about to get brighter: speaking at the Barclay's Capital Global Technology Conference today, CEO Paul Otellini said that some 35 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/moorestown">Moorestown</a> tablets running a mix of Windows, Android, and MeeGo would arrive in 2011. (No wonder the company just <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intel-quietly-forms-netbook-and-tablet-group-to-fend-off-competi/">formed a tablet and netbook division</a>.) What's more, he provided a handy chart showing the OS breakdown by vendor: Toshiba, Dell, Fujitsu are going Windows-only, while Asus and Lenovo are building both Windows and Android products, and Acer's going straight MeeGo. (Remember, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/23/acer-debuts-10-1-inch-windows-7-tablet-amd-powered-inbuilt-3g/">Acer's using AMD</a> in its Windows tablet.) That's pretty much <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">right on schedule</a>, and we'd expect to see several of these at CES, but not all the news is so rosy: Otellini also said that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/medfield">Medfield</a>-based smartphones won't arrive until "mid-2011," which is a bit of a delay from the "first half of 2011" we'd <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/intel-moorestown-tablets-will-arrive-before-smartphones-wont-h/">been told in June</a>. Sure, it doesn't sound like the end of the world, but ARM-based competitors like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/18/qualcomm-teases-28nm-dual-core-snapdragons-pixel-punching-adren/">Qualcomm</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/tis-omap4440-processor-brings-two-blazing-cortex-a9-cores-to-th/">TI</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/nvidia-touts-the-benefits-of-multi-core-processors-for-smartphon/">NVIDIA</a> continue to push ever farther ahead with multicore designs, and Intel can't very well catch up with delayed parts. Then again, if Intel can really deliver the performance and efficiency it's been promising it might not matter -- we'll see what CES has in store.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/">Intel's Otellini says 35 Atom-based tablets coming in 2011, but smartphones get pushed back (again)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19752873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/08/intels-otellini-says-35-atom-based-tablets-coming-in-2011-but/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atom</category><category>delay</category><category>intel</category><category>medfield</category><category>moorestown</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>tablets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel and Microsoft CEOs give iPad a nod, plan to kill it dead with Oak Trail next year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/" style="outline-style: none; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(0, 189, 246);"><img vspace="4" border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/oaktraillead.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px 15px 12px;" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel CEO Paul Otellini said a number of interesting things while explaining away <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/12/intel-reports-record-11-1-billion-earnings-brings-home-3-bill/">$11.1 billion dollars</a>, as did Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer in a post<span style="text-decoration: underline;">-</span><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Wp7Launch/">Windows Phone 7 launch</a> interview with <em>CNET</em>, but the pair individually touched on a common theme -- both desire to beat down the iPad, and both believe that Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OakTrail/">Oak Trail</a> chip might make a suitable club. Though Ballmer said that Microsoft partners would have tablets this holiday season, before Oak Trail is done, he called out the "enhancement" the new chips would bring to the Windows tablet experience, calling Oak Trail specifically "an important part of our roadmap." Meanwhile, Intel's Otellini explained just how much Chipzilla will bank on the touchscreen slates to come, saying that Intel will "utilize all of the assets at our disposal to win this segment" and calling the tablet market a viable third business alongside PCs and netbooks. "You will see Intel solutions that run on Windows, Android and MeeGo operating systems across a variety of form factors and price points," he said, and suggested that Oak Trail silicon would lead the charge.<br />
<br />
You can read the other interesting things both men said at our source links, but there is one more we'll call out now: Otellini said that Intel intends to integrate the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/30/intel-gobbles-up-infineons-mobile-unit-in-1-4-billion-deal-lo/">recently-acquired</a> Infineon's 3G and LTE wireless capabilities directly into Atom processors for tablets and phones, starting in about three years.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/">Intel and Microsoft CEOs give iPad a nod, plan to kill it dead with Oak Trail next year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19671627/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/13/intel-and-microsoft-ceos-give-ipad-a-nod-plan-to-kill-it-dead-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Intel</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Oak Trail</category><category>OakTrail</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>TabletPc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel CEO reveals Google TV launch is this month, explains McAfee purchase]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/potellini1220a-1284065789.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Today's <i>Wall Street Journal</i> has a few key words from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel">Intel</a> CEO <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/paulotellini">Paul Otellini</a>, with a few comparing his company's Google TV approach to the refreshed (and now Intel-free) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/appletv">Apple TV</a>. The biggest revelation is a mention that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/googletv">Google TV</a> will start shipping this month (more specific than Google's own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/google-tv-set-to-launch-this-year-samsung-considering-android-f/">fall prediction</a> of a few days ago) with no word whether that includes products from <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/sony-internet-tv-box-for-google-tv-revealed-by-the-fcc/">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/logitech-revue-gets-official-google-tv-companion-box-coming-thi/">Logitech</a> or both. According to Otellini, Intel's success will mean using "the right chip for the right job," and that includes getting its hands dirty on the software side, where he claims his company is responsible for 50% of the code in Google TV. When asked about Apple's simplified approach to the living room he referenced them as two different approaches that may appeal to different audiences, pointing out Apple TV as something his mother might enjoy while his son could make use of Facebook on the Google TV. <br />
<br />
Oh, and the $7.68 billion <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/19/intel-acquires-mcafee-for-7-68-billion/">Intel dropped on McAfee last month</a>? He considers it a "valuable asset" and says the best security relies on a combination of hardware and software. The theme of the day is how Intel can compete beyond the PC, but whether it's tethered to the TV or in tablets, the head guy is confident Intel's industry partners won't let Apple run away with either.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/">Intel CEO reveals Google TV launch is this month, explains McAfee purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19627685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/intel-ceo-reveals-google-tv-launch-is-this-month-explains-mcafe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple tv</category><category>AppleTv</category><category>ceo</category><category>google tv</category><category>GoogleTv</category><category>intel</category><category>mcafee</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0714oub245advvx.jpg" /></a></div>
Right now, Intel has every right to lay contentedly atop the laurels of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/intel-has-its-best-quarter-ever-brings-in-2-9b-profit/">its biggest quarterly profit ever</a>, but that's not what the company is doing at all. Instead of protracting the life of its current-gen processors unduly, Intel is planning to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-briefly-demos-next-gen-sandy-bridge-laptop-platform-at-com/"><em>accelerate</em></a> the roadmap for its next generation of multicore parts, codenamed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a>. The difference between the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/intel-core-presser-32nm-core-i3-core-i5-and-core-i7-cpus/">Nehalem-based stuff</a> we have today and the upcoming chip is that the Sandy Bridge architecture takes everything down to 32nm -- including the graphics processor and memory controller which are built at 45nm at present -- while keeping it all within the same enclosure. Enthusiastic feedback from customers who were given tasters of the Sandy stuff has been to blame for this haste on Intel's part, and we're told that with additional investment in 32nm infrastructure, the chip giant plans to make deliveries late this year. That in turn could potentially result in some eager vendor pushing a Sandy Bridge laptop or desktop out before 2010 is through -- which would be all kinds of nice.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/">Intel's Sandy Bridge CPUs to arrive ahead of schedule, could be with us this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19553624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/14/intels-sandy-bridge-cpus-to-tape-out-ahead-of-schedule-could-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>ceo</category><category>chips</category><category>cpu</category><category>forecast</category><category>intel</category><category>laptop</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>schedule</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel promises to bring wireless display technology to other mobile devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/intel-wireless-display-grab.png" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Details are unfortunately light on this one, but Intel has closed out the week with one interesting tidbit of news -- it's apparently planning to bring its wireless display technology (a.k.a. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/widi">WiDi</a>) to netbooks, tablets and other mobile devices. That word comes straight from Intel wireless display product manager Kerry Forrell, who says that "we fully expect to take the technology there," but that he can't yet provide a specific time frame. Those plans are further backed up by Intel CEO Paul Otellini himself, who told investors this week that "what we'll be doing over the next few years is take the Wi-Di capability that's in the laptop today and extend that into all the Intel platforms." Intel doesn't even seem to be stopping there, however, with Forrell further adding that the company even sees the technology being built into to TVs "over time."</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/">Intel promises to bring wireless display technology to other mobile devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 15 May 2010 02:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19478292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/15/intel-promises-to-bring-wireless-display-technology-to-other-mob/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>handheld</category><category>intel</category><category>intel wireless display</category><category>IntelWirelessDisplay</category><category>kerry forrell</category><category>KerryForrell</category><category>mid</category><category>netbook</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>tablet</category><category>widi</category><category>wireless display</category><category>WirelessDisplay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 02:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Live from Paul Otellini's Intel CES keynote]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="live_update">
<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/intel-keynote-ces10-0001-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></div>
We're in our seats for Intel CEO Paul Oteliini's CES keynote and we're being told it starts in five minutes. Can you feel the love tonight?</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Live from Paul Otellini's Intel CES keynote</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/">Live from Paul Otellini's Intel CES keynote</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19308045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/live-from-paul-otellinis-intel-ces-keynote/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ces</category><category>ces 2010</category><category>Ces2010</category><category>intel</category><category>keynote</category><category>liveblog</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA takes its feud with Intel to cartoonish new levels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.intelsinsides.com/page/home.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-11-05-09.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Oh, boy. Just when you thought NVIDIA 's feud with Intel couldn't rise above endless <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/27/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-lviii-nvidia-ceo-doesnt-know-what-lar/">name-calling</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/27/nvidia-sues-intel-right-back-over-nehalem-chipset-licensing/">lawsuits</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/nvidia-halting-chipset-development-after-all/">production shutdowns</a>, NVIDIA does <em>this</em>. I<span name="intelliTxt" id="intellitxt">n a series of not-so-subtle cartoons on the recently established <em>Intel's Insides</em> website -- which NVIDIA's spokesperson has confirmed is, in fact, hosted by NVIDIA -- NVIDIA takes aim at Intel (and CEO </span><span name="intelliTxt" id="intellitxt">Paul Otellini, specifically) over a range of alleged ill doings, and even goes so far as to include a cheeky disclaimer that the site "is not provided, sponsored or endorsed by Intel Corporation." Hit up the gallery below for a quick retrospective, and stay tuned for what we can only hope is a decent comeback from Intel.<br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/">NVIDIA takes its feud with Intel to cartoonish new levels</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#2428264"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#2428265"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#2428266"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#2428267"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#2428268"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/intel-nvidia-05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/">NVIDIA takes its feud with Intel to cartoonish new levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19225631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/nvidia-takes-its-feud-with-intel-to-cartoonish-new-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cartoon</category><category>cartoons</category><category>feud</category><category>fight</category><category>industry</category><category>infighting</category><category>intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>nvidia</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA responds to Intel's Ion dismissal, all eyes on recess for confrontation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-ion-intel-atom-response,7113.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/nvidia-intel-02-26-09.png" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">It wasn't too hard to see this one coming, but NVIDIA has now shot back at Intel and responded point by point to each accusation <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/24/intel-rips-into-nvidias-ion-platform/">Intel made recently</a> about its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ion">Ion platform</a>. For starters, while NVIDIA doesn't exactly dispute that Ion is just a repurposed MCP79M/MCP7A chipset, it does say that Ion is a "modern 2 chip solution," while Intel is relying on a "4-year-old 3 chip design." NVIDIA also points out that Ion is certified by Microsoft to deliver the "premium Windows experience," and not just Windows XP, and that, contrary to Intel's claim, Ion does in fact offer similar battery life to an Intel-based system while also delivering ten times the performance. In related news, Intel CEO Paul Otellini himself hit NVIDIA with a few jabs yesterday at a Goldman Sachs conference in San Francisco, saying that NVIDIA is simply not in a strong competitive position, and that, "if you don't have a microprocessor, what else do you have to sell?" Meanwhile, AMD was said to be wandering around the cafeteria, looking for a seat at the lunch table.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-ion-intel-atom-response,7113.html">Read</a> - Tom's Hardware, "Nvidia Fires Back at Intel's Anti-Ion Sentiments"<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10172140-64.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Read</a> - CNET, "Intel CEO comments on Nvidia, economy, flash"<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/">NVIDIA responds to Intel's Ion dismissal, all eyes on recess for confrontation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1472596/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/nvidia-responds-to-intels-ion-dismissal-all-eyes-on-recess-for/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>ion</category><category>netbook</category><category>nettop</category><category>nvidia</category><category>nvidia ion</category><category>NvidiaIon</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel CEO compares Silverthorne criticality with original Pentium]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faz.net%2Fs%2FRubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C%2FDoc%257EEBEA57819302B40618346AF926288F857%257EATpl%257EEcommon%257EScontent.html&amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;prev=%2Flanguage_tools"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/6-9-07-intel_ceo.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Intel's been throwing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/29/intels-penryn-core-2-quad-processor-on-schedule/">so many</a> mobile processor <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/04/intel-touts-20x-less-power-hungry-umpcs-lays-out-processor-road/">codenames</a> around in the past 12 months or so that we've resorted to hiring droids to constantly update pivot tables as chips are <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/">named</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/20/intels-santa-rosa-platform-officially-dubbed-centrino-pro/">nixed</a> from its ever-evolving roadmap. But being the weekend and all, it looks like we're stuck telling you about yet another presumably vital processor that's likely destined to hit cellphones, UMPCs, and other handheld computing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/16/intels-mid-umpcs-so-long-xp-vista-hello-linux/">platforms</a> sometime in the not too distant future. According to an interview by Germany's FAZ, Intel's CEO compared the chip "to the original Pentium" in terms of importance to the company, and while Mr. Otellini didn't go into too much detail beyond that (can't blame him for keeping us curious), he did note that the firm hopes the 45nm CPU can infiltrate "10 to 20-percent of the mobile phone market."<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32404/118/">TGDaily</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/">Intel CEO compares Silverthorne criticality with original Pentium</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faz.net%2Fs%2FRubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C%2FDoc%257EEBEA57819302B40618346AF926288F857%257EATpl%257EEcommon%257EScontent.html&amp;langpair=de%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;prev=%2Flanguage_tools>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/914240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/intel-ceo-compares-silverthorne-criticality-with-original-pentiu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>cellphone processor</category><category>CellphoneProcessor</category><category>chip</category><category>cpu</category><category>IDF</category><category>intel</category><category>McCaslin</category><category>microprocessor</category><category>mobile processor</category><category>MobileProcessor</category><category>Paul Otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>pentium</category><category>roadmap</category><category>Silverthorne</category><category>umpc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_2" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/09/otellini_idf_intel1.jpg" />While we've been busy covering <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/slingbox-pro-and-tuner-to-be-released-october-22/">lots</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/sony-announces-ps3-game-prices-for-us-59-99/">of</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/sirius-stiletto-100-availability-announced/">other</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/nokia-n75-packs-3g-for-us-shores/">news</a> <a href="http://tv.engadget.com/2006/09/26/nokias-n95-smartphone-goes-legit/">today</a>, <a href="http://engadget.com/tag//intel">Intel</a> has also been clamoring for the spotlight -- Otellini and Co. had a number of announcements about the future of processors at today's Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco. Firstly, the quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/19/intel-readies-quadro-chips-for-november-release/">Core 2 Extreme</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/11/intels-core-2-quadro-on-the-horizon/">Core 2 Quad</a> chips have been officially unveiled and slated for production, with the former running in servers this fall, and the latter appearing in desktops by 2007. Of course, these chips are the same ones we've been hearing about for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/10/intel-shows-off-first-quad-core-chip/">last seven months</a>, and it appears that <em>DigiTimes'</em> previous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/19/intel-readies-quadro-chips-for-november-release/">prediction</a> that these procs would debut in November was correct. Secondly, Intel's CEO (pictured at right) told the audience that the chipmaker has already built a prototype with 80 processing cores on a single chip that can perform a trillion floating-point operations per second -- that's a teraflop to the layman -- and is aiming to ready commercial versions within five years. Otellini also teased everyone with announcements of the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/">45nm-based architecture</a>, code-named "Nehalem", which will ship in 2008, and the new "Gesher" <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/10/intel-goes-multi-core-crazy-for-keifer-server-line/">32nm chips</a> by 2010, which would allow for a 310 percent increase in Intel processors' performance-per-Watt by that time -- hey, better late than never. Finally, in a move that will surely be met with angry glares from <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/apple">Cupertino</a>, Intel is putting up a $1 million bounty for a Viiv-based <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/macmini">Mac mini</a> killer, something that will turn a traditional living room PC into something that is "sexy, stylish and small" (you mean the mini's not?) as determined by a panel that includes judges from <em>PC Magazine</em>, <em>GQ</em> and of course, Otellini himself. Be sure to check the couple extra pics on the next page.<br /><br /><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060926/tc_nm/intel_dc">Read</a> - Quad-core chips coming in November<br /><a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/09/26/quad_core_workstation_server/">Read</a> - First quad-core servers, desktops coming<br /><a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-6119618.html?part=rss&amp;tag=6119618&amp;subj=news">Read</a> - 80-core chips coming by 2011<br /><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/09/26/idf_otellini_keynote_process_tech/">Read</a> - Higher performance-per-watt <br /><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/09/26/intel_viiv_pc_contest/">Read</a> - $1 million bounty<br /><br />[Photos: <a href="http://ricardosblog.com/blog/2006/09/paul_otellini_idf_keynote_in_p.html">Ricardo</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/">Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/675383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>core 2 extreme</category><category>core 2 quad</category><category>Core2Extreme</category><category>Core2Quad</category><category>gesher</category><category>idf</category><category>intel</category><category>intel developer forum</category><category>IntelDeveloperForum</category><category>nehalem</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyrus Farivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
