<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Physics teacher adopts Google Glass, gives students a glance at CERN (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/03/physics-teacher-adopts-google-glass/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/03/physics-teacher-adopts-google-glass/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/03/physics-teacher-adopts-google-glass/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/03/physics-teacher-adopts-google-glass/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Physics teacher adopts Google Glass, gives students a firsthand look at CERN video" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/05/andrew-vanden-heuvel-google-glass-cern-1367606042.jpg" /></a></p>

<p>When Google asked <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/26/google-glass-explorers/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">what we'd do</a> if we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/30/google-glass-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">had Glass</a>, it was no doubt hoping we'd produce some world-changing ideas. We now know at least a few exist, courtesy of physics teacher Andrew Vanden Heuvel. He's long been hoping to use the wearable tech for remote teaching and one-on-one sessions, and the Glass Explorer program has given him the chance to do just that. His first stop? None other than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/27/cern/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CERN</a>. Courtesy of a trip for Google's new Explorer Story video series, Vanden Heuvel is the first person to teach a science course while inside the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> tunnel, streaming his perspective to students thousands of miles away. While we don't know if other Explorer Stories will be quite as inspiring, we'll admit to being slightly jealous -- where was Glass when we were kids?<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Peter]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wearables/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wearables</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/03/physics-teacher-adopts-google-glass/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://agl-initiatives.org/my-cern-adventure/" target="_blank">AGL Initiatives</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>cern</category><category>education</category><category>glass</category><category>google</category><category>googleglass</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>streaming</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20557695</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Laser scans objects in 3D from half a mile away, scientists just need reason to use it]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/09/long-range-laser-scanner/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/09/long-range-laser-scanner/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/09/long-range-laser-scanner/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/09/long-range-laser-scanner/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Laser scans objects in 3D from half a mile away, scientists look for excuse to fire it" data-src-height="449" data-src-width="619" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/04/laser-camera-lead.jpg" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3dscanner?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">3D scanning</a> at a range of 0.62 miles? It just became possible, thanks to a laser camera developed by physicists at Heriot Watt University in Edinburgh, UK. You can pretty much see how it works from the images above -- laser beams are bounced off the target and the duration of their return journey is measured precisely enough to detect millimeter depth changes even at extreme distances. Speaking of which, the researchers believe they could pump the range up to <em>10 miles</em> with a bit of extra research, and even shrink the blaster down to make it "fully portable" in less than five years. Who knows, someday it might even work <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/21/mit-laser-camera-corner-light/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">around corners</a>. But there's a problem: skin doesn't reflect the beams properly, which means people can't be accurately scanned unless they also happen to be ringwraiths. As a result, the researchers seem slightly at loss as to what to do with the technology, with their best suggestions so far being watching the growth of foliage or tracking the movement of rocks. We'd try to think up some other ideas, were it not for the distracting and utterly irrelevant <em>Nazgul v Wilhelm</em> video embedded after the break.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/09/long-range-laser-scanner/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.hw.ac.uk/news-events/news/new-camera-system-creates-high-resolution-3-d-11809.htm" target="_blank">Heriot Watt</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>3d</category><category>camera</category><category>heriot watt</category><category>HeriotWatt</category><category>laser</category><category>physics</category><category>range</category><category>scanner</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20534940</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[NVIDIA rolls out Apex and PhysX developer support for the PlayStation 4]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/07/nvidia-rolls-out-apex-and-physx-developer-support-for-the-ps4/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/07/nvidia-rolls-out-apex-and-physx-developer-support-for-the-ps4/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/07/nvidia-rolls-out-apex-and-physx-developer-support-for-the-ps4/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="NVIDIA rolls out APEX and PhysX developer support for the PlayStation 4" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/03/ps4-knack-340.jpg" /></p><p> Just because the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/PlayStation4/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">PlayStation 4</a> centers around an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/20/sony-details-playstation-4-specs-8-core-amd-jaguar-cpu-8x-bl/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">AMD-based platform</a> doesn't mean that NVIDIA is out of the picture. The graphics firm is updating the software developer kits for both its Apex dynamics framework and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidia,physx/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">PhysX</a> physics modeling system to address Sony's new console, even if they won't have the full hardware acceleration that comes with using NVIDIA's own chipsets. The introductions will mostly take some of the guesswork out of creating realistic-looking games -- theoretically, adding a larger number of collisions, destructible objects and subtler elements like cloth and hair modeling. Most of us won't see the fruits of the updated SDKs until at least this holiday, but programmers looking for more plausible PS4 game worlds can hit the source links.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/sony/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/nvidia/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">NVIDIA</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/07/nvidia-rolls-out-apex-and-physx-developer-support-for-the-ps4/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="https://developer.nvidia.com/apex" target="_blank">NVIDIA (1)</a><!--//-->, <a href="https://developer.nvidia.com/technologies/physx" target="_blank">(2)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>apex</category><category>console</category><category>developer</category><category>gaming</category><category>gpgpu</category><category>nvidia</category><category>physics</category><category>physx</category><category>playstation4</category><category>ps4</category><category>sdk</category><category>sony</category><category>VideoGames</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20492939</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider stops for two years of tune-ups, goes out on a high note (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Large Hadron Collider goes silent for two years of repairs and retrofits" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/large-hadron-collider-620.jpg" /></a></p><p> We've long known that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LargeHadronCollider/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> would need to take a break, but that doesn't take the edge off of the moment itself: as of Valentine's Day, the particle accelerator has conducted its last test for the next two years. The giant research ring will undergo sweeping repairs and upgrades that should should give it the superconducting connectors needed to hit the originally planned 14TeV of combined collision energy, versus the 8TeV it's been limited to almost since <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/10/cerns-large-hadron-collider-started-are-we-still-here/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">the beginning</a>. CERN's machine arguably earned the downtime. After a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/11/large-hadron-collider-damaged-and-we-have-the-photos-to-prove-it/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">rough</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/02/large-hadron-collider-grinds-to-a-halt-again/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">start</a>, it went on to produce rafts of collision data and healthy evidence of the elusive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Higgs boson</a>. If you're still down, think of the hiatus as doing us a favor -- it postpones any <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/us-lawsuit-calls-large-hadron-collider-a-doomsday-machine-higgs/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">world-ending disasters</a> until around 2015.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/16/large-hadron-collider-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-maintenance/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/cerns-lhc-shuts-down-for-two-years-of-upgrades/" target="_blank">Ars Technica</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://press.web.cern.ch/press-releases/2013/02/first-three-year-lhc-running-period-reaches-conclusion" target="_blank">CERN</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>cern</category><category>hiatus</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>lhc</category><category>maintenance</category><category>minipost</category><category>particleaccelerator</category><category>physics</category><category>shutdown</category><category>upgrade</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20464956</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[MIT demos new form of magnetism that could lead to quantum communication, storage]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/20/mit-demos-new-form-of-magnetism-that-could-lead-to-quantum-tech/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/20/mit-demos-new-form-of-magnetism-that-could-lead-to-quantum-tech/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/20/mit-demos-new-form-of-magnetism-that-could-lead-to-quantum-tech/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/20/mit-demos-new-form-of-magnetism-that-could-lead-to-quantum-tech/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="MIT demos new form of magnetism that could lead to quantum communication, storage" data-src-height="465" data-src-width="618" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/12/mit-herbertsmithite.jpg" /></a></p><p> It's not often that researchers can verify a discovery that could change how we approach basic principles of technology, not just build on what we know. Nonetheless, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MIT/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MIT</a> might have accomplished just such a feat in demonstrating a new state of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/magnetism/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">magnetism</a>. They've shown that a synthetically grown sample of herbertsmithite crystal (what you see above) behaves as a quantum spin liquid: a material where fractional quantum states produce a liquid-like flux in magnetic orientations, even if the material is solid. The behavior could let communications and storage take advantage of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/quantumentanglement/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">quantum entanglement</a>, where particles can affect each other despite relatively long distances. MIT warns us that there's a wide gap between showing quantum spin liquids in action and developing a complete theory that makes them useful; we're not about to see <em>Mass Effect</em>'s quantum entanglement communicator, if it's even possible. To us, realizing that there may be a wholly untapped resource is enough reward for now.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/20/mit-demos-new-form-of-magnetism-that-could-lead-to-quantum-tech/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/mit-researchers-discover-a-new-kind-of-magnetism-1219.html" target="_blank">MIT</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>herbertsmithite</category><category>magnetism</category><category>minipost</category><category>mit</category><category>physics</category><category>quantum</category><category>QuantumEntanglement</category><category>quantumspinliquid</category><category>science</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20408620</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider may have produced a previously undetected form of matter]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/28/large-hadron-collider-may-have-produced-color-glass-condensate/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/28/large-hadron-collider-may-have-produced-color-glass-condensate/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/28/large-hadron-collider-may-have-produced-color-glass-condensate/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/28/large-hadron-collider-may-have-produced-color-glass-condensate/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Large Hadron Collider may have produced previously unconfirmed form of matter" data-src-height="413" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/lead-proton-collision-lhc.jpg" /></a></p><p> Teams at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LargeHadronCollider/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> must be developing a knack for producing tangible evidence of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">theoretical particles</a>. After orchestrating 2 million collisions between lead nuclei and protons, like the sort you see above, the collider's Compact Muon Solenoid group and researchers at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MIT/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MIT</a> suspect that stray, linked pairs of gluon particles in the mix were signs of color-glass condensate, a currently theory-only form of matter that sees gluons travel in liquid-like, quantum-entangled waves. The clues aren't definitive, but they were also caught unexpectedly as part of a more routine collision run; the team is curious enough that it's looking for more evidence during weeks of similar tests in January. Any conclusive proof of the condensate would have an impact both on how we understand particle production in collisions as well as the ways gluons and quarks are arranged inside protons. If so, the CMS and MIT teams may well answer a raft of questions about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/subatomic/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">subatomic</a> physics while further justifying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CERN/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CERN's</a> giant underground rings.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/28/large-hadron-collider-may-have-produced-color-glass-condensate/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/lead-proton-collisions-at-large-hadron-collider-yield-surprising-results-1127.html" target="_blank">MIT</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>color-glasscondensate</category><category>gluon</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>lead</category><category>lhc</category><category>MIT</category><category>particle</category><category>physics</category><category>proton</category><category>subatomic</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20390412</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alt-week 11.17.12: freestyle brain scans, hovering moon base and robot dolphin replacements]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/alt-week-11-17-12-freestyle-brain-scans-hovering-moon-base/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/alt-week-11-17-12-freestyle-brain-scans-hovering-moon-base/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/alt-week-11-17-12-freestyle-brain-scans-hovering-moon-base/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <em>Alt-week takes a look at the best science and alternative tech stories from the last seven days.</em></p><p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/alt-week-11-17-12-freestyle-brain-scans-hovering-moon-base/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Altweek 111712 freestyle brain scans, hovering moon base and robot dolphin replacements" data-src-height="376" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/altweek171112jt.jpg" /></a></p><p> This week we're all over the place. Sorry about that, but it's all for the greater good. We start things off right down at the quantum level, then head to the oceans, before a quick jaunt into space before landing back deep inside your mind. All in the name of science, of course. Science and hip-hop that is. This is alt-week.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/17/alt-week-11-17-12-freestyle-brain-scans-hovering-moon-base/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>alt-week</category><category>alternative</category><category>altweek</category><category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>space</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20380902</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alt-week 11.10.12: the contagious smell of fear, finding Bigfoot, and the theory of everything]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/10/alt-week-11-10-12-the-contagious-smell-of-fear-finding-bigfoot/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/10/alt-week-11-10-12-the-contagious-smell-of-fear-finding-bigfoot/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/10/alt-week-11-10-12-the-contagious-smell-of-fear-finding-bigfoot/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <em>Alt-week takes a look at the best science and alternative tech stories from the last seven days.</em></p><p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/10/alt-week-11-10-12-the-contagious-smell-of-fear-finding-bigfoot/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Altweek 111012 the contagious smell of fear, finding Bigfoot, and the theory of everything" data-src-height="412" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/altweek101112jt.png" /></a></p><p> There are some questions that have puzzled the human race more or less since the dawn of time. Why are we here? What is the meaning of life? You know the sort of thing. While we might not have the answers to these just yet, thanks to science, we're getting there. In this week's instalment we discover that you can, in fact, smell fear. Meanwhile, one scientist pledges to launch an ambitious hunt for Bigfoot, and we get an early hint at what could be the start of an explanation for life, the universe and everything. This is alt-week.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/10/alt-week-11-10-12-the-contagious-smell-of-fear-finding-bigfoot/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>alt</category><category>alt-week</category><category>alternative</category><category>altweek</category><category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>space</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20375376</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rovio and CERN teaming up on education: hopefully the Angry Birds help us this time [update]]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/rovio-and-cern-teaming-up-on-education/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/rovio-and-cern-teaming-up-on-education/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/rovio-and-cern-teaming-up-on-education/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/rovio-and-cern-teaming-up-on-education/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Rovio and CERN teaming up on education hopefully the Angry Birds help us this time" data-src-height="391" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/large-hadron-collider-angry-birds-1349900807.jpg" /></a></p><p> The last time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CERN/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CERN</a> and an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/angrybirds?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">angry bird</a> met, it didn't end so well: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LargeHadronCollider/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> overheated after a feathered creature reportedly dropped its breakfast on outdoor machinery. Things should go much more smoothly this time around, with CERN and Rovio partnering on an educational initiative that will be unveiled in full at the Frankfurt Book Fair on October 12th. Although the two are shy on just what's entailed beyond the presence of some <em>Angry Birds</em> material at the event, the union will mark the start of Rovio's learning brand and likely represent more in the long run than another <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/23/rovio-takes-angry-birds-space-for-a-spin-with-nasa-curiosity/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><em>Angry Birds Space</em> tie-in</a>. We're mostly wondering if subatomic physics research will explain why we still can't three-star some levels in a physics-based game.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> Rovio and CERN announced "Angry Birds Playground" this morning, which the company describes as, "a learning program for 3- to 8-year-olds based on the Finnish National Curriculum for kindergarten." In so many words, CERN and Rovio are partnering on an educational initiative aimed at young children which employs the iconic Angry Birds characters. It's unclear whether the initiative will spawn games or books or ... <em>what</em> exactly, but there you have it.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/11/rovio-and-cern-teaming-up-on-education/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>angry birds</category><category>angry birds playground</category><category>angry birds space</category><category>AngryBirds</category><category>AngryBirdsPlayground</category><category>AngryBirdsSpace</category><category>cern</category><category>education</category><category>games</category><category>gaming</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>learning</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>particle physics</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>ParticlePhysics</category><category>physics</category><category>rovio</category><category>rovio mobile</category><category>RovioMobile</category><category>subatomic</category><category>video games</category><category>video gaming</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>VideoGaming</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20346834</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Visualized: Sandia National Laboratories' Z machine erupts in a web of lightning]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/05/visualized-sandia-labs-z-machine-erupts-in-a-web-of-lightning/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/05/visualized-sandia-labs-z-machine-erupts-in-a-web-of-lightning/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/05/visualized-sandia-labs-z-machine-erupts-in-a-web-of-lightning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/05/visualized-sandia-labs-z-machine-erupts-in-a-web-of-lightning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Visualized Sandia Labs' Z machine erupts in a web of EMP lightning" data-src-height="423" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/sandia-labs-z-machine.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandialabs?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Sandia National Laboratories'</a> Z machine sounds like it belongs in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/JamesBond/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">James Bond</a> movie more than it does an Alberquerque research facility. Based on what it can do, that's not as far-fetched as it seems. What you see isn't the handiwork of some electric spider -- it's what you witness in the immediate fraction of a second after the Z's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/electromagneticpulse/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">electromagnetic pulse</a> kicks in and forks of lightning burst across the 108-foot distance inside. The pulse in question is key to Sandia's studies of fusion and the effect of very intense magnetic pressures on materials that normally refuse to change states. Even in 2006, the Z was putting out pressure more than 10 million times that of the atmosphere, and it successfully melted diamond at roughly half that strength. It goes without saying that we don't want to be anywhere near this kind of energy when scientists flick the switch, but we're glad to see that something so pretty <em>and</em> deadly can help us understand physics.</p><p> [Image credit: Randy Montoya, Sandia National Laboratories]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/05/visualized-sandia-labs-z-machine-erupts-in-a-web-of-lightning/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>electricity</category><category>electromagnetic pulse</category><category>ElectromagneticPulse</category><category>emp</category><category>fusion</category><category>lightning</category><category>nuclear fusion</category><category>NuclearFusion</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>sandia</category><category>sandia labs</category><category>Sandia National Laboratories</category><category>sandia national labs</category><category>SandiaLabs</category><category>SandiaNationalLaboratories</category><category>SandiaNationalLabs</category><category>science</category><category>visualized</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20293219</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Utah researchers create 'Spintronic' LED, claim it's 'brighter, cheaper' and eco-friendly]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/14/utah-researchers-create-spintronic-led-oled-display/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/14/utah-researchers-create-spintronic-led-oled-display/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/14/utah-researchers-create-spintronic-led-oled-display/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/14/utah-researchers-create-spintronic-led-oled-display/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Utah researchers create 'Spintronic' LED, claims its 'brighter, cheaper' and ecofriendly" data-src-height="180" data-src-width="240" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/spintronicled.jpg" style="margin: 12px; float: right;" /></a>Spintronics? Not exactly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/spintronics?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">a new term</a> 'round these parts, but University of Utah physicists are applying it in a unique way that may eventually make TVs look even sharper than they do today. The entity is trumpeting a new "spintronic" organic light-emitting diode (that's OLED, for short) that's said to be "cheaper and more environmentally friendly than the kinds of LEDs now used in television and computer displays, lighting, traffic lights and numerous electronic devices." Z. Valy Vardeny is even going so far as to call it a "completely different technology," and better still, a prototype has already been made. The professor expects that the newfangled tech -- which produces an orange glow today -- will be able to product red, blue and white spin OLEDs within a few years. It's a lot to wade through, but here's our question: will these things make the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/12/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-and-iii-display-shootout/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Galaxy S XI</a> impeccably visible in outdoor sunlight? (<em>Please say "yes."</em>)</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/14/utah-researchers-create-spintronic-led-oled-display/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>display</category><category>lcd</category><category>oled</category><category>organic led</category><category>OrganicLed</category><category>panel</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>Spintronic</category><category>university</category><category>university of utah</category><category>UniversityOfUtah</category><category>Utah</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20277175</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Researchers create space-time crystal schematic, still won't undo those ill-advised high school photos]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/10/researchers-create-space-time-crystal-schematic/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/10/researchers-create-space-time-crystal-schematic/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/10/researchers-create-space-time-crystal-schematic/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/10/researchers-create-space-time-crystal-schematic/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Researchers create spacetime crystal schematic, still won't undo those illadvised high school photos" data-src-height="297" data-src-width="200" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/space-time-crystal-1341882922.jpg" style="margin: 12px 16px; float: left;" /></a>Think your cute little <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/03/mineways-3d-printed-models-minecraft/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Minecraft schematics</a> are the bomb? Well, a group of international researchers sees your quaint, little 3D masterpiece and raises you the blueprint for a 4D space-time crystal. Building on an idea floated earlier this year by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/theoretical+physics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">theoretical physics</a> guru and Nobel Laureate Frank Wilczek of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MIT/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MIT</a>, a team led by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/uc+berkeley?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">UC Berkeley</a> researcher Tongcang Li has created a schematic for a crystal with a fourth dimension -- movement in time. The resulting space-time crystal is being described as something akin to an infinitely running clock that does not require any additional energy once it starts going. The researchers also claim that the crystal can be built in just a few years -- provided that the necessary funding is available to the team that decides to take on the project, of course. Unfortunately, the crystal is still a long way from the Mr. Fusion-powered, time-traveling <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/delorean?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">DeLorean</a> that we truly desire. In the meantime, brainy types can feel free to click on the source link for more nuggets of wisdom about the research.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/science/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/10/researchers-create-space-time-crystal-schematic/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>space-time</category><category>space-time crystal</category><category>Space-timeCrystal</category><category>spacetime</category><category>theoretical physics</category><category>TheoreticalPhysics</category><category>time</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Hidalgo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20274717</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[CERN confirms existence of new particle consistent with Higgs boson (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="CERN confirms existence of new particle consistent with Higgs boson" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/thehiggsishereprobablyyeahjt.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 338px;" /></a></p><p> Physics' big announcement had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven-by-atlas-cms/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">more in common</a> with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/27/googles-nexus-7-tablet-outed-before-i-o/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">leaky product launch</a> than the serious business of re-writing the science books. But slack asset management aside, it's official: a new boson has been observed with a standard deviation of 5 (confidence of 99.9%). The highly anticipated announcement came this morning direct from CERN's press conference (via ICHEP in Melbourne,) and is the result of an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">intense</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/22/lhc-discovers-particle-starts-repaying-back-that-five-billion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ongoing</a> search for the elusive particle. The observation is of a boson particle with a mass of 125.3 &plusmn; 0.6 GeV, at a significance of 4.9 sigma. Joe Incandela -- giving the presentation -- said that this is "In agreement with the standard model at 95% confidence range." The boson is the heaviest ever found, and although this is still a preliminary result, it's by far the strongest case yet for the existence of the elusive Higgs.</p><p> The sought-after particle is essential for supporting the current understanding of sub-atomic world, and its bearing on nuclear, and electromagnetic interactions. The next stage will be to determine the exact characteristics of the new particle and whether it matches the expectations of the Higgs, or is it in fact something more "exotic." This part will take much more time, but for now, a (very) small, but important piece of the puzzle has been found.</p><p> <strong>Update:</strong> We're sure you've got many questions, and CERN apparently anticipated this. Check out the more coverage link for a helpful FAQ about everything Higgs.</p><p> [Image credit: CERN]</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/04/cern-confirms-existence-of-new-particle-consistent-with-higgs-bo/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>ATLAS</category><category>big bang</category><category>BigBang</category><category>CERN</category><category>CMS</category><category>discovery</category><category>higgs boson</category><category>HiggsBoson</category><category>ICEP</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>LHC</category><category>particle</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>particle physics</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>ParticlePhysics</category><category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>standard model</category><category>StandardModel</category><category>sub atomic</category><category>SubAtomic</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20271442</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Higgs boson just may, possibly, more or less be proven to exist by ATLAS and CMS teams]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven-by-atlas-cms/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven-by-atlas-cms/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven-by-atlas-cms/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Higgs boson just may, possibly, more or less be proven by ATLAS and CMS teams" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/cern-atlas-detector.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 391px;" /></a></p><p> We had a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/cern-dont-believe-the-higgs-boson-hype/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">false alarm</a> over the possible discovery of the theory-unifying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Higgsboson/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Higgs boson</a> last year, but a bit of poking and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">prodding</a> in subsequent months may well have given us much more definitive evidence of the elusive particle. According to some rare rumors emerging from <em>Nature</em>, both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CERN/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">CERN's</a> ATLAS and CMS detectors have seen particle decay signals suggesting the existence of Higgs to within a 4.5 to 5 sigma level of proof -- in other words, very nearly concrete evidence. That's not quite the 5-plus needed to settle the matter, but it's to a much higher level of certainty than before. As if to add fuel to the fire, <em>ScienceNews</em> even located a briefly posted, CERN-made video (sadly, since pulled) saying bluntly that the CMS team had "observed a new particle."</p><p> Whether or not there's any substance is another matter. <em>Nature</em> hears that scientists are supposedly still working out what to say at an event on Wednesday, while CERN has made the slightly odd claim to <em>ScienceNews</em> that the yanked video is just one of several pre-recorded segments made to cover possible outcomes -- you know, in that "Dewey defeats Truman" sort of way. Unless the scientists have to go back to the drawing board, though, the focus from now on may be more on learning <em>how</em> Higgs behaves than its very existence. Any significant truth could see researchers proving the validity of the standard model of physics just as we're firing up our Independence Day barbecues.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/higgs-boson-just-may-be-proven-by-atlas-cms/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>atlas</category><category>atlas detector</category><category>AtlasDetector</category><category>boson</category><category>cern</category><category>cms</category><category>cms detector</category><category>CmsDetector</category><category>higgs</category><category>higgs boson</category><category>HiggsBoson</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>lhc</category><category>particle</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>particle physics</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>ParticlePhysics</category><category>particles</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>science</category><category>standard model</category><category>standard model of physics</category><category>StandardModel</category><category>StandardModelOfPhysics</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20270946</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Vanishing neutrons could be travelling to a parallel universe]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/vanishing-neutrons-could-be-travelling-to-a-parallel-universe/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/vanishing-neutrons-could-be-travelling-to-a-parallel-universe/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/vanishing-neutrons-could-be-travelling-to-a-parallel-universe/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/vanishing-neutrons-could-be-travelling-to-a-parallel-universe/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Vanishing neutrons could be travelling to parallel universes" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/6-18-2012sliders.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 449px; " /></a></p><p> Time to break out your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/theoreticalphysics?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">theoretical physics</a> cap for a moment. A new idea about the cause of neutron loss (a phenomena in which neutrons seem to momentarily disappear), is pushing the boundaries of easy to conceptualize science. Zurab Berezhiani and Fabrizio Nesti of Italy's University of l'Aquila have suggested that the particles could briefly be visiting parallel universes before returning. Experiments have shown that the rate of loss is dependent on the direction and strength of an applied magnetic field -- an anomaly that doesn't jibe with current physics. If a parallel universe existed consisting of so-called "mirror particles," however, the neutrons could temporarily swap places with its invisible twin before returning to its rightful place in this world. More experimentation is needed, but if the predictions of Berezhiani and Nesti are correct, it could indicate that we're surrounded by mirror particles in a parallel universe -- a potential culprit for the mystery of dark matter.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/19/vanishing-neutrons-could-be-travelling-to-a-parallel-universe/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Fabrizio Nesti</category><category>FabrizioNesti</category><category>neutron loss</category><category>NeutronLoss</category><category>parallel universes</category><category>ParallelUniverses</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>science</category><category>theoretical physics</category><category>TheoreticalPhysics</category><category>University of lAquila</category><category>UniversityOfLaquila</category><category>Zurab Berezhiani</category><category>ZurabBerezhiani</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20260710</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider affected by full moon, ocean commiserates]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/08/large-hadron-collider-affected-by-full-moon/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/08/large-hadron-collider-affected-by-full-moon/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/08/large-hadron-collider-affected-by-full-moon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/08/large-hadron-collider-affected-by-full-moon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Large Hadron Collider affected by full moon, ocean commiserates" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/lhc-corrected-orbit-moon.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 239px; " /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LargeHadronCollider/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> not running properly? If you've read the docs and restarted it, check for a full moon. After noticing fewer particle collisions while on her shift, Pauline Gagnon reached out to a control room operator who casually explained that they adjust beam alignment during full moons. Yes, the tide-producing orbit of Earth's satellite tugs the LHC's inner workings ever so slightly askew. Though minute, the changes add up over the collider's 27km circumference and are picked up by monitoring equipment sensitive enough to measure elementary particles. However, Luna isn't the only thing that affects the accelerator -- the water level in Lake Geneva and passing high-speed rail trains also do the trick. Will your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">hand react</a> differently to the LHC's beam under a Harvest Moon? Probably not. In any case, hit the source for the scientific details.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/08/large-hadron-collider-affected-by-full-moon/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cern</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>LHC</category><category>moon</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>particle collider</category><category>particle physics</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>ParticleCollider</category><category>ParticlePhysics</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>science</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis Santos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 03:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20254264</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ZeroN slips surly bonds, re-runs your 3D gestures in mid-air]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs" height="338" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/zeron-05-14-12-01.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> Playback of 3D <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Motion+Capture?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">motion capture</a> with a computer is nothing new, but how about with a solid <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/artist-creates-back-to-the-future-hoverboard-that-actually-ho/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">levitating object</a>? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mitmedialab?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MIT's Media Lab</a> has developed ZeroN, a large magnet and 3D actuator, which can fly an "interaction element" (aka ball bearing) and control its position in space. You can also bump it to and fro yourself, with everything scanned and recorded, and then have real-life, gravity-defying playback showing planetary motion or virtual cameras, for example. It might be impractical right now as a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/27/kinectnui-enables-minority-report-style-interaction-in-windows-s/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Minority Report</a>-type object-based input device, but check the video after the break to see its awesome potential for 3D visualization.</p><p></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/14/zeron-levitation-mit-media-labs/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>3D</category><category>electromagnetic</category><category>electromagnetic field</category><category>ElectromagneticField</category><category>input device</category><category>input devices</category><category>InputDevice</category><category>InputDevices</category><category>levitation</category><category>magnet</category><category>magnetic levitation</category><category>MagneticLevitation</category><category>massachusetts institute of technology</category><category>MassachusettsInstituteOfTechnology</category><category>MIT</category><category>MIT Media Lab</category><category>MitMediaLab</category><category>Optical tracking</category><category>OpticalTracking</category><category>physics</category><category>Research</category><category>Science</category><category>tracking</category><category>ZeroN</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20237392</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[CERN scientists explain what would happen if you put your hand in the LHC's beam (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="CERN scientists explain what would happen if you put your hand in the LHC's beam (video)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/largehaldroncollider.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 332px;" /></a></p><p> Sure, concerns about the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lhc?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> creating a world-destroying black hole may have been more or less put to rest, but there's still plenty of pressing questions that remain unanswered. Like, what would happen if you put your hand in the beam? The folks from <em>Sixty Symbols</em> recently asked some physicists that very question and got some rather puzzled responses, so they went straight to CERN itself to get a definitive answer. You can see that in full after the break, but the short version is that it's something like the force of a moving aircraft carrier concentrated down to a laser-like one-millimeter-wide beam (accompanied by a wider beam of particles that would irradiate your entire body). Bad news. As they're quick to point out, though, actually getting anywhere near the beam is virtually impossible.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/04/cern-scientists-explain-what-would-happen-if-you-put-your-hand-i/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cern</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>LHC</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>physics</category><category>science</category><category>video</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20231176</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Physicist uses math to get out of a traffic ticket, publishes findings]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/physicist-uses-math-to-get-out-of-a-traffic-ticket-publishes-fi/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/physicist-uses-math-to-get-out-of-a-traffic-ticket-publishes-fi/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/physicist-uses-math-to-get-out-of-a-traffic-ticket-publishes-fi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <img alt="Image" height="340" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/best-paper-ever-math-stopsi.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="410" /></p><p> When most folks get ticketed for running a stop sign, most people wind up writing the court a check. UC San Diego <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/physics/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">physicist</a> Dmitri Krioukov wrote a mathematical paper instead. Rather than throw his fallible human opinion on the mercy of the court, Krioukov uses a series of equations and graphs to prove that the accusing officer confused his car's real space-time trajectory "for a trajectory of a hypothetical object moving at approximately constant linear speed without stopping at the stop sign." In other words, the officer was wrong, but Krioukov stresses that it isn't the officer's fault. "This mistake is fully justified," he writes, pointing to the math. "As a result of this unfortunate coincidence, the O's perception of reality did not properly reflect reality." And to think, you probably <em>never </em>thought you'd use this kind of math in the <em>real </em>world.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/17/physicist-uses-math-to-get-out-of-a-traffic-ticket-publishes-fi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>Dmitri Krioukov</category><category>DmitriKrioukov</category><category>equations</category><category>law</category><category>laws</category><category>math</category><category>physicist</category><category>Physics</category><category>Sci/Tech</category><category>stop sign</category><category>StopSign</category><category>traffic</category><category>UC San Diego</category><category>UcSanDiego</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20217210</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Flawed diamonds are perfect ingredients for quantum computing, just add time travel]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/07/flawed-diamonds-are-perfect-ingredients-for-quantum-computing-j/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/07/flawed-diamonds-are-perfect-ingredients-for-quantum-computing-j/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/07/flawed-diamonds-are-perfect-ingredients-for-quantum-computing-j/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/07/flawed-diamonds-are-perfect-ingredients-for-quantum-computing-j/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Flawed diamonds are perfect ingredients for quantum computing, just add time travel" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/quantum-diamond2.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 433px; height: 440px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a></div>Ready to suspend your brain cells in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">superposition</a> of disbelief? Good, because the latest news published in <em>Nature</em> is that diamonds are a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/quantumcomputing?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">quantum computer</a>'s best friend -- particularly if they're flawed. An international team of scientists sought out sub-atomic impurities in a 1mm-thick fragment of over-priced carbon and used these as qubits to perform successful calculations. A "rogue" nitrogen nucleus provided one qubit, while a free electron became a second. Unlike previous attempts at solid-state quantum computing, this new effort used an extra technique to protect the system from decoherence errors: microwave pulses were fired at the electron qubit to "time-reverse" inconsistencies in its spinning motion. Don't fully get it? Us neither. In any case, it probably won't stop jewellers tut-tutting to themselves.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/07/flawed-diamonds-are-perfect-ingredients-for-quantum-computing-j/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>atom</category><category>carbon</category><category>diamond</category><category>electron</category><category>physics</category><category>quantum</category><category>quantum computer</category><category>quantum computing</category><category>quantum mechanics</category><category>quantum physics</category><category>QuantumComputer</category><category>QuantumComputing</category><category>QuantumMechanics</category><category>QuantumPhysics</category><category>qubit</category><category>solid-state quantum computing</category><category>Solid-stateQuantumComputing</category><category>sub-atomic</category><category>University of Southern California</category><category>UniversityOfSouthernCalifornia</category><category>USC</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20210063</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IBM: We're on the cusp of the Quantum Computing revolution (video)]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/6922524657b215c7a2a0o-1330381744.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Technology's holy grail is the development of a "perfect" <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/groundbreaking-photonic-chip-could-spark-quantum-computing-revol/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Quantum Computer</a>. Traditional computers recognize information as bits: binary information representing "On" or "Off" states. A quantum computer uses qubits: operating in superposition, a qubit exists in all states simultaneously -- not just "On" or "Off," but every possible state in-between. It would theoretically be able to instantly access every piece of information at the same time, meaning that a 250 qubit computer would contain more data than there are particles in the universe. IBM thinks it's closer than ever to realizing this dream and if you want to know more, we have the full details after the break.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">IBM Superconducting QBit Setup</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/4849898?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/6922524667e28ddec76do_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/4849894?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/6774890006047a9d0b7bo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/4849897?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/6922524657b215c7a2a0o_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/4849896?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/69215656197684d9cf3bo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/ibm-superconducting-qbit-setup/4849895?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/69210994557deab9236eo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/28/ibm-quantum-computing/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>American Physical Society</category><category>AmericanPhysicalSociety</category><category>Complete universal quantum gate set approaching fault-tolerant t</category><category>CompleteUniversalQuantumGateSetApproachingFault-tolerantThreshol</category><category>Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Physics</category><category>CopenhagenInterpretationOfQuantumPhysics</category><category>David DiVincenzo</category><category>DavidDivincenzo</category><category>Hard Science</category><category>HardScience</category><category>IBM</category><category>IBM Research</category><category>IbmResearch</category><category>Mark Ketchen</category><category>MarkKetchen</category><category>Matthias Steffen</category><category>MatthiasSteffen</category><category>Physics</category><category>Quantum Computing</category><category>quantum decoherence</category><category>Quantum Physics</category><category>QuantumComputing</category><category>QuantumDecoherence</category><category>QuantumPhysics</category><category>Qubit</category><category>Superconducting qubit in waveguide cavity with coherence time ap</category><category>SuperconductingQubitInWaveguideCavityWithCoherenceTimeApproachin</category><category>Superposition</category><category>video</category><category>Yale University</category><category>YaleUniversity</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20180979</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider to increase beam energy: Higgs boson can run, not hide]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/largehaldroncollider.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 332px;" /></a></div>We've seen the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Large+Hadron+Collider/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Large Hadron Collider</a> running at a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/large-hadron-collider-to-attempt-7-tev-proton-collisions-via-liv/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">record-breaking 7 TeV</a> for short periods, but now CERN is turning it up a notch (to 4 TeV from 3.5) for the rest of the year. The decision comes after an annual performance workshop last week in Chamonix and a report from the CERN Machine Advisory Committee (CMAC). The increase may seem modest compared to the knee-trembling levels of 7 TeV, but it's all part of a broader optimization strategy. Scientists state the new approach should increase the data collected in 2012 to 15 inverse femtobarns -- a three-fold jump from 2011. Even more encouraging is a statement from CERN's Research Director, Sergio Bertolucci, who claims that we should <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/13/cern-dont-believe-the-higgs-boson-hype/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">finally know</a> for sure about the existence of the Higgs boson -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/might-higgs-boson-be-a-time-traveling-neer-do-well-out-to-destr/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">either way</a> -- before the LHC enters a temporary shut-down period at the end of the year. Beam yourself over the break for the full press release.
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/14/large-hadron-collider-to-increase-beam-energy-higgs-boson-can-r/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>4 tev</category><category>4Tev</category><category>ATLAS</category><category>cern</category><category>CMAC</category><category>CMS</category><category>energy beam</category><category>EnergyBeam</category><category>femtobarn</category><category>higgs boson</category><category>HiggsBoson</category><category>large hadron collider</category><category>LargeHadronCollider</category><category>LHC</category><category>particle accelerator</category><category>particle physics</category><category>ParticleAccelerator</category><category>ParticlePhysics</category><category>physics</category><category>research</category><category>science</category><category>standard model</category><category>StandardModel</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Trew]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20171558</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nokia reveals polarizing secrets of ClearBlack display]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nokia-how-clearblack-display-works/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nokia-how-clearblack-display-works/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nokia-how-clearblack-display-works/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nokia-how-clearblack-display-works/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/nokia-polarisation.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Nokia's revealing the secrets behind ClearBlack: its display technology that, even under the brightest sunlight, renders black as black as blackest night during a dark spell. Wedged above the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/11/nokia-e7-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">E7</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/nokia-lumia-800-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Lumia 800</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/nokia-900-is-real/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">900</a> displays are three thin layers, a linear polarizer, a quarter-wave retardation film and a reflecting surface. When light enters the first layer, it vertically aligns the "wave vibration" of the light so when it hits the retardation layer, it begins to rotate towards the right. Hitting the reflecting surface causes it to reverse, becoming left-circularly polarized before passing through the retardation later again, where it polarizes horizontally. This enables the polarizing filter up top to screen out horizontally polarized light, meaning it doesn't reflect back in your face. Why (we hear you ask) then doesn't it happen with the light from the display itself? Because it only passes through the second half of the process, it doesn't become horizontally aligned, leading to that beautifully dark display reaching your peepers. It's a clever and elegant solution that we can't help but be impressed at, even if we've used up the world's supply of the word 'polarize' in order to explain to you.</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/06/nokia-how-clearblack-display-works/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>AMOLED</category><category>ClearBlack</category><category>Display</category><category>Light Reflection</category><category>LightReflection</category><category>Lumia</category><category>Lumia 800</category><category>Lumia 900</category><category>Lumia800</category><category>Lumia900</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Nokia ClearBlack</category><category>Nokia E7</category><category>NokiaClearblack</category><category>NokiaE7</category><category>OLED</category><category>Physics</category><category>Polarization</category><category>Wave Vibration</category><category>WaveVibration</category><category>Windows Phone</category><category>Windows Phone 7</category><category>WindowsPhone</category><category>WindowsPhone7</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20164974</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[World's longest lab experiment still going strong, via webcam]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/27/worlds-longest-lab-experiment-still-going-strong-via-webcam/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/27/worlds-longest-lab-experiment-still-going-strong-via-webcam/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/27/worlds-longest-lab-experiment-still-going-strong-via-webcam/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/27/worlds-longest-lab-experiment-still-going-strong-via-webcam/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/drop.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div><div style="text-align: left; "> In 1927, a physics professor named Thomas Parnell launched an experiment on viscous liquids. 85 years later, we're still waiting for his results. It all began with a funnel, a beaker, and some melted tar pitch. Parnell, a professor at the University of Queensland in Australia, was hoping to demonstrate that brittle tar pitch actually behaves as a liquid when kept at room temperature. To prove this, he melted some tar pitch, let it cool for three years, and placed it within the funnel, held over the beaker. The first drop rolled down the funnel eight years later. The second came nine years after that. By the time the third rolled around, Parnell had already passed away. Following his death, the experiment was shelved, quite literally, in a closet, before Professor John Mainstone revived it shortly after joining the University of Queensland in 1961. In 1975, Mainstone successfully lobbied the university to put the experiment on display, but he likely could've never imagined how large an audience it would ultimately have. Today, in fact, the experiment is on display 24 hours a day, via a dedicated webcam. It's been hailed as the world's longest running lab experiment, and it's available for gazing at the source link below. Mainstone expects the next drop to come down the pipeline sometime next year, but you probably shouldn't hold your breath. The last drop ran down the funnel in 2000. Unfortunately, it was never recorded on video, due to a <em>very</em> untimely camera malfunction.</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/27/worlds-longest-lab-experiment-still-going-strong-via-webcam/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>australia</category><category>experiment</category><category>funnel</category><category>john mainstone</category><category>JohnMainstone</category><category>liquid</category><category>physics</category><category>tar pitch</category><category>TarPitch</category><category>thomas parnell</category><category>ThomasParnell</category><category>university of queensland</category><category>UniversityOfQueensland</category><category>web</category><category>webcam</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20158203</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Researchers build world's smallest steam engine that could]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/researchers-build-worlds-smallest-steam-engine-that-could/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/researchers-build-worlds-smallest-steam-engine-that-could/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/researchers-build-worlds-smallest-steam-engine-that-could/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/researchers-build-worlds-smallest-steam-engine-that-could/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/steam-engine.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
	Wanna create your very own microscopic steam engine? Just take a colloid particle, put it in water, and add a laser. That's a <em>CliffsNotes</em> version of what a group of German researchers recently did to create the world's smallest steam engine. To pull it off, engineers from the University of Stuttgart and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/max+planck+institute?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems</a> tweaked the traditional approach introduced by Robert Stirling nearly 200 years ago. In Stirling's model, gas within a cylindrical tube is alternately heated and cooled, allowing it to expand and push an attached piston. Professor Clemens Bechinger and his team, however, decided to downsize this system by replacing the piston with a laser beam, and the cylinder's working gas with a single colloid bead that floats in water and measures just three thousandths of a millimeter in size. The laser's optical field limits the bead's range of motion, which can be easily observed with a microscope, since the plastic particle is about 10,000 times larger than an atom. Because the beam varies in intensity, it effectively acts upon the particle in the same way that heat compresses and expands gas molecules in Stirling's model. The bead, in turn, does work on the optical field, with its effects balanced by an outside heat source. The system's architects admit that their engine tends to "sputter" at times, but insist that its mere development shows that "there are no thermodynamic obstacles" to production. Read more about the invention and its potential implications in the full press release, after the break.</div>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/alt/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Alt</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/12/researchers-build-worlds-smallest-steam-engine-that-could/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>bead</category><category>colloid</category><category>concept</category><category>development</category><category>efficiency</category><category>energy</category><category>engine</category><category>Germany</category><category>heat</category><category>laser</category><category>laser beam</category><category>LaserBeam</category><category>max planck institute</category><category>max planck institute for intelligent systems</category><category>MaxPlanckInstitute</category><category>MaxPlanckInstituteForIntelligentSystems</category><category>optical field</category><category>OpticalField</category><category>particle</category><category>physics</category><category>plastic</category><category>research</category><category>robert stirling</category><category>RobertStirling</category><category>steam engine</category><category>SteamEngine</category><category>Thermodynamics</category><category>worlds smallest steam engine</category><category>WorldsSmallestSteamEngine</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20125764</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>