<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[TiVo Premiere DVRs in the Bay Area get Comcast VOD starting today]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/"><img alt="TiVo DVRs in the Bay Area updated with Comcast video on-demand starting today" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/xfinitytivocentral573x322.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 573px; height: 322px;" /></a></div>Just one month shy of a year after we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/09/comcast-will-open-up-its-video-on-demand-to-tivo-premiere-dvrs-a/">first heard it would happen</a> (not counting the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/oops-tivo-premiere-wont-have-comcast-on-demand/">icon flub during the original Premiere announcement</a>) TiVo has announced its DVRs will be able to access Comcast's Xfinity On Demand library. The blog and product page feature several screenshots flashing the Xfinity VOD icon and showing off the TiVo Premiere UI's universal search pulling from Comcast's library alongside other sources like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu Plus. Until now, switching to third party DVRs exclusively meant largely foregoing access to Comcast's VOD, but with this customers who dig the TiVo experience can switch without making compromises. Naturally, to make use of this customers will need to be Comcast TV subscribers, although we hear the video will be delivered via QAM just like on cable company owned boxes instead of IP, which might provide higher video quality than the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/27/xbox-360-apps-now-live-for-comcast-xfinity-tv-hbo-go-and-mlb-tv/">Xbox 360's recently launched app</a>. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/04/tivo-premiere-updates-coming-with-new-netflix-and-youtube-apps/">update</a> will be made available to customers in the San Francisco Bay Area to start, delivered "today and over the next few weeks" -- no word yet when we'll see this roll out elsewhere.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>TiVo Premiere DVRs in the Bay Area get Comcast VOD starting today</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/">TiVo Premiere DVRs in the Bay Area get Comcast VOD starting today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20211962/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/10/tivo-comcast-vod-launch-bay-area/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>app</category><category>breaking news</category><category>comcast</category><category>dvr</category><category>hd dvr</category><category>hd vod</category><category>HdDvr</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>HdVod</category><category>ip</category><category>qam</category><category>tivo</category><category>tivo premiere</category><category>TivoPremiere</category><category>video on demand</category><category>VideoOnDemand</category><category>vod</category><category>xfinity</category><category>xfinity tv</category><category>xfinity video on demand</category><category>XfinityTv</category><category>XfinityVideoOnDemand</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boxee and the NCTA debate if ClearQAM is good for us]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/"><img alt="ClearQAM delivered HD" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/clearqam-2012.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 16px;" /></a></div>The National Cable &amp; Telecommunications Association and Boxee don't see eye to eye on whether or not <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ClearQAM/">ClearQAM</a> is good or bad for us. Boxee argues that encrypting even those channels free and clear via an antenna, as a few cable companies have requested permission from the FCC to do, will increase your bill and limit competition. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NCTA/">NCTA</a> alternatively claims that eliminating ClearQAM will enable self installs, thus reducing costs and truck rolls, because the coax outside your house will no longer need to be disconnected when you cancel service, and that Boxee should just adopt CableCARD if it wants the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/BoxeeBox/">Boxee Box</a> to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/boxee-box-live-tv-starts-shipping-boxee-1-5-software-update-now/">access live cable TV</a> -- of course most anyone who has had a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CableCARD/">CableCARD</a> setup knows that a simple truck roll to connect a cable outside is child's play. While this struggle has played out in public with FCC filings, social media and blog posts, we all just fondly remember a day when setting up a TV was as simple as connecting a single coax cable and running a channel scan. Of course, it would be nice if the FCC would actually force <em>more</em> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/">QAM</a> to be sent in the clear and require accurate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/">PSIP</a> data while it's at it, but we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/">gave up on that dream years ago</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/">Boxee and the NCTA debate if ClearQAM is good for us</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20172917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/16/boxee-and-the-ncta-debate-if-clearqam-is-good-for-us/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boxee</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQAM</category><category>FCC</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>National Cable  Telecommunications Association</category><category>NationalCableTelecommunicationsAssociation</category><category>NCTA</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Simple.tv DVR / placeshifter frees free TV from the constraints of location, time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/simple.tvfront.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
One of the many innovative products we checked out tonight was this ViXS XCode 4210 powered Simple.TV box, which tunes into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/clearqam">free, unencrypted channels</a> (even <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/">in HD</a>) via cable or antenna. Where it starts to differ from other boxes like Sling and Monsoon however, is that it eschews any direct video out or even passthrough, working solely to transcode those feeds to variable bitrate MPEG-4 streams for playback on internet-connected mobile devices and TV boxes. Besides the missing TV out, this headless unit also only supports DVRs courtesy of whatever storage you may add yourself, since it doesn't contain any. The Simple.TV box is set to launch this spring and initially should have viewing apps available for Roku and iPad, with Boxee Box and Google TV viewers eventually planned as well (there is also a $29 Windows Media Center app). Currently the pricing is set at $149, and while streaming to another device in the home and simple DVR function are free to use, adding a guide and allowing streaming to up to 5 devices over the internet will require another $4.99 per month. If you're interested, check out the video after the break and keep a spot near your coax line open.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/">simple.tv DVR hands-on</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/#4733832"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/dsc0813_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/#4733833"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/simpletv-dvr-2012-01-101_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/#4733834"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/simpletv-dvr-2012-01-102_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/#4733835"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/simpletv-dvr-2012-01-103_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/simple-tv-dvr-hands-on/#4733836"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/simpletv-dvr-2012-01-10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Simple.tv DVR / placeshifter frees free TV from the constraints of location, time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/">Simple.tv DVR / placeshifter frees free TV from the constraints of location, time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20144819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/simple-tv-dvr-placeshifter-frees-free-tv-from-the-constraints/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apps</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2012</category><category>Ces2012</category><category>connected tv</category><category>ConnectedTv</category><category>dvr</category><category>hands-on</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hdtv</category><category>ota</category><category>placeshifter</category><category>PlaceShifting</category><category>qam</category><category>simple tv</category><category>simple.tv</category><category>SimpleTv</category><category>streamer</category><category>streaming</category><category>transcode</category><category>tv</category><category>video</category><category>vixs</category><category>xcode</category><category>xcode 4210</category><category>Xcode4210</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DVBLink turns any ATSC or clear QAM tuner into a networked tuner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="DVBLogic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/dvblinkuniverse.jpg" /></a></div>
A craze that was started by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SiliconDust/">Silicon Dust </a>years ago is very popular for a very good reason -- network tuners are incredibly flexible -- and it just came to any ATSC or clear QAM tuner. The company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DVBLogic/">DVBLogic</a> has made it possible to turn any DVB tuner into a network tuner for some time, but since we don't DVB in the US, it hasn't been very useful on this side of the Atlantic. The latest release of DVBLink includes said ability which might be just the way for you to watch live HD on your laptop using the existing tuner in your HTPC. It isn't free software, but we're betting if you have the need the ~40 Euro price won't keep you from it -- assuming the free 30 day trial works as advertised.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/">DVBLink turns any ATSC or clear QAM tuner into a networked tuner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19521208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/dvblink-turns-any-atsc-or-clear-qam-tuner-into-a-networked-tuner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>DVBLink</category><category>DVBLogic</category><category>hd</category><category>MC</category><category>Media Center</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>qam</category><category>Windows 7 Media Center</category><category>Windows Media Center</category><category>Windows7MediaCenter</category><category>WindowsMediaCenter</category><category>WMC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ZeeVee adds remote management to ZvBox line, QAM 64 broadcasting and more]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.cepro.com/article/zeevee_delivers_remote_management_for_zvbox_line/#When:17:53:00Z"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/zvbox-170.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
ZeeVee as a whole has transformed mightily as a company since we saw 'em debut back in May of 2008, now catering its hardware business towards enterprise customers and the occasional high-end home owner. That said, there's still reason to pay attention, particularly if you're an existing owner of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ZvBox/">ZvBox</a>. The company recently made known that a trio of gratis updates were being made available, the first of which added remote management capabilities to the entire line. Essentially, this upgrade allows multiple ZvBoxes to be simultaneously connected to a single computer at the ZvBox deployment site, and then access is granted to said computer via the web. In turn, an administrator can completely control distribution and the like, adding a bit of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sling/">Sling</a> flair to the whole ordeal. In lesser news, all ZvBoxes can now also broadcast using QAM 64 (in addition to the traditional QAM 256 method), and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/12/zeevee-ships-the-2-500-zvpro-250/">ZvPro 250</a> can now deliver a single video stream with split-audio, which could be helpful in serving up multilingual streams. Or, you know, a censored version of that R-rated movie for your kid's room.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/">ZeeVee adds remote management to ZvBox line, QAM 64 broadcasting and more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 18 May 2010 15:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19482165/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/zeevee-adds-remote-management-to-zvbox-line-qam-64-broadcasting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HA</category><category>hd</category><category>home automotion</category><category>HomeAutomotion</category><category>QAM</category><category>qam tuner</category><category>QamTuner</category><category>Remote Management</category><category>RemoteManagement</category><category>RF modulator</category><category>RfModulator</category><category>ZeeVee</category><category>zvbox</category><category>ZvPro 250</category><category>Zvpro250</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 15:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Clear QAM HD isn't going anywhere!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-19-08-wintv-hvr-2250.jpg" alt="Clear QAM tuner" /><br /></div>
Oh we just love the echo chamber that is the internet these days -- some genius reads about something as harmless as a integrated security waver for cheap digital SD set-top-boxes and automatically predicts the end of clear QAM as we know it. Now we hate <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tru2way">all the feet dragging by cable operators</a> in the US as much as the next, and wish the FCC would enforce the Telecommunications Act of 1996 already, but that doesn't mean that everything big cable does is evil, or that the FCC is useless. <br /><br />The bottom line is that local broadcast channels are available in HD to any cable subscriber with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/">clear QAM</a> tuner, whether you have a set-top-box or not. The recent news changes nothing, except maybe a very select few who were lucky enough to receive more than locals via clear QAM. We dropped the FCC a line to make sure we had our facts straight -- wouldn't want to call people out without checking our own first -- and the very prompt answer we received was that this statutory requirement goes all the way back to the <font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><span style="">to the Communications Act of 1934</span></span></font> (<font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><span style="">Section 614(b)(4)(B). <br /><br />More recently, the FCC addressed the issue when laying down the digital transition rules </span></span></font>which "states that broadcast signals that are subject to mandatory carriage must be "viewable via cable on all television receivers of a subscriber which are connected to a cable system by a cable operator or for which a cable operator provides a connection." Now obviously we're not lawyers, but it seems pretty clear that local cable operators are not allowed to encrypt any locally broadcast HD stations. Now we've heard reports that some cable companies do indeed encrypt these signals, but while you might be willing to complain on some forum about it, have you taken the time to file a proper complaint with the FCC? If not, then you really don't have anything to complain about.<br /><br /><a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.doc">Read</a> (doc) - <font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">The 2007 Report to set the transition rules (paragraph 15)<br /><br />**UPDATE** As you can see from the comments, with anything legal it isn't exactly cut and dry. In fact the only thing we've managed to accomplish is to be confused. So while some level of broadcast TV has to be free, we're not sure if it's free as in beer or what. Stay tuned for a follow up just as soon as we figure it out.</span></font><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/">Clear QAM HD isn't going anywhere!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19144378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/clear-qam-hd-isnt-going-anywhere/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>clear QAM</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>FCC</category><category>hd</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HD 101: What is ATSC, PSIP, QAM, and 8-VSB?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="HD master control" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/08/master-control-%28the-guy-at-the-switch%29.jpg" /><br />
<div align="left">Once you buy an HDTV it doesn't take long before you get confused by all the acronyms. We love us some HD, but the days of simply bringing a new set home and plugging into a coax cable are long over -- at least for most. It is pretty obvious by the latest surveys that most people don't understand exactly what it takes to enjoy HD on their HDTV, but even if you do, you may not understand what most of it means. Now while this isn't the typical make sure you have your HDTV configured to watch HD post, it will help you understand the different ways HD is delivered.<br /></div>
<br /></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HD 101: What is ATSC, PSIP, QAM, and 8-VSB?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/features/" rel="tag">Features</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/">HD 101: What is ATSC, PSIP, QAM, and 8-VSB?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 08 May 2009 11:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1507590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/08/hd-101-what-is-atsc-psip-qam-and-8-vsb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8-VSB</category><category>8VSB</category><category>AC3</category><category>ATSC</category><category>broadband</category><category>cable</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>FCC</category><category>featured</category><category>features</category><category>hd</category><category>HD 101</category><category>HD-101</category><category>HD101</category><category>modulator</category><category>NTSC</category><category>ota</category><category>PSIP</category><category>QAM</category><category>QAM256</category><category>SDV</category><category>UHF</category><category>VHF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola's QUE100 MicroEncoder lets analog sources and digital displays to play nice]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://connectedhome2go.com/2009/04/08/making-use-of-analog-video-with-a-microencoder/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/20090409-motorola_que100.jpg" alt="Motorola QUE100 MicroEncoder" /></a><br /></div>
We were pretty excited to see analog TVs <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/17/best-buy-kicks-analog-tvs-to-the-curb/">disappear</a> from store shelves; <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/30/senate-okays-another-digital-tv-transition-delay/">delays</a> in the analog shutoff aside, it was a big move in the right direction. But wouldn't you know it, there's a niche market that still legitimately needs to move video around to analog-only endpoints -- security cameras, commercial distribution systems and MDU (multiple dwelling units) setups, for example. Users of such systems who haven't stocked up on analog sets will be glad to know Motorola's got them covered with the QUE100 QAM MicroEncoder. The svelte rack-mountable units will soak up 2, 4, 8 or 12 (depending on model) standard definition <strike>MPEG-2</strike> analog video feeds along with their audio and put them all into a single MPEG-2 QAM output that can be tuned on those newfangled digital tuners.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-formats/" rel="tag">Other formats</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/" rel="tag">Other hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/">Motorola's QUE100 MicroEncoder lets analog sources and digital displays to play nice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://connectedhome2go.com/2009/04/08/making-use-of-analog-video-with-a-microencoder/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1513259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/10/motorolas-que100-microencoder-lets-analog-sources-and-digital-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analog</category><category>hd</category><category>microencoder</category><category>motorola</category><category>other formats</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherformats</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><category>que100</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cable HD compression gets turned up a notch in the Electra 8000 encoder]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/190250-Harmonic_Packs_Four_HDs_Per_QAM_Channel.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/electra8000_lr.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We haven't talked about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/">QAM cramming</a> much recently, but we have a feeling its ugly, pixelated head will soon be raised once more, now that Harmonic is launching the DiviCom Electra 8000 encoder, capable of stuffing four MPEG-2 HD streams in one QAM channel. It might be an interesting bit of hardware if you're a head end tech, capable of delivering 1080p60, MPEG-4 and MPEG-2 video capable of three encoding passes, but all we can see at the end is too many channels slotted into too little frequency and the potential for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/20/is-your-comcast-hd-quality-up-to-snuff/">compression artifacts</a>. Anyone stopping by Cable Show '09 this week should be able to get a demo, with the first units shipping in June, we'll be keeping a close eye on both our channel lineup and picture quality.<br /><br />[Thanks, Larry]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/">Cable HD compression gets turned up a notch in the Electra 8000 encoder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/190250-Harmonic_Packs_Four_HDs_Per_QAM_Channel.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1501624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/cable-hd-compression-gets-turned-up-a-notch-in-the-electra-8000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>cable show</category><category>CableShow</category><category>compression</category><category>electra 8000</category><category>Electra8000</category><category>harmonic</category><category>hd</category><category>mpeg-2</category><category>qam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Latest CE Pro Magazine reveals the ZeeVee ZvPro]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.zeevee.com/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2009/01/zeeveepro1.jpg" alt="ZvPro add in CE Pro" /></a><br /></div> Well looky here, the wonders that is print media isn't useless just yet -- thanks to very long lead times and an ambitious postal worker, the latest edition of <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/CEPro/">CE Pro</a> Magazine reveals the evidently soon to be announced ZvPro. The ad doesn't offer up enough details for us, but it does look like some of <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/">our biggest gripes about the original ZeVee Box</a> are addressed. For example, now we have component and Toslink input as well as RS-232 control and an IR port -- no indication if that is an input or an output. The rack mountable device is obviously geared towards the prosumer so it isn't too much of a stretch to assume this little baby will demand a premium price -- if we were the betting type, we'd have our money on over $800. But even at that price, we're sure this box will find at least a few homes as there are plenty of people trying to figure out how to send HD over the existing coax in their home without mounting a STB on the wall below the HDTV.<br /><br />[Thanks, Utah]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/" rel="tag">Peripherals</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/">Latest CE Pro Magazine reveals the ZeeVee ZvPro</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1417869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/03/latest-ce-pro-magazine-reveals-the-zvpro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CE Pro</category><category>CePro</category><category>HDTV</category><category>QAM</category><category>RF-Modulator</category><category>ZeeVee</category><category>ZeeVee Pro</category><category>ZeeveePro</category><category>zvpro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ViewSonic's 22-inch N2201w LCD TV packs inbuilt DVD player, TV tuner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://channels.isp.netscape.com/celebrity/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/1322/20080923/0824272199.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-24-08-viewsonic_n2201w.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We still haven't been able to shake the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/viewsonic-shows-off-a-120hz-lcd-display-for-computers/">ViewSonic dragon</a> from our memory, but we're attempting to move on with our lives by directing our attention (however briefly) to the N2201w. This so-called "3-in-1" LCD TV packs a 22-inch 1,680 x 1,050 resolution panel, a 5-millisecond response time, 1,000:1 contrast ratio and a built-in NTSC / ATSC / QAM TV tuner. You'll also find an integrated DVD player and an HDMI port, and just to prove it really is multifaceted, there's a PC input to boot. No telling if the picture quality is anything to write home about, but the $429 price tag sure is palatable.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.cepro.com/article/viewsonic_n2201w_lcd_has_built_in_dvd_player_pc_ability/">CEPro</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-formats/" rel="tag">Other formats</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/players/" rel="tag">Players</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/">ViewSonic's 22-inch N2201w LCD TV packs inbuilt DVD player, TV tuner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://channels.isp.netscape.com/celebrity/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/1322/20080923/0824272199.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1322848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>clearqam</category><category>dvd lcd combo</category><category>DvdLcdCombo</category><category>hd</category><category>lcd</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>monitor</category><category>N2201w</category><category>ota</category><category>other formats</category><category>otherformats</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><category>ViewSonic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ViewSonic's 22-inch N2201w LCD TV packs inbuilt DVD player, TV tuner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://channels.isp.netscape.com/celebrity/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/1322/20080923/0824272199.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-24-08-viewsonic_n2201w.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
We still haven't been able to shake the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/viewsonic-shows-off-a-120hz-lcd-display-for-computers/">ViewSonic dragon</a> from our memory, but we're attempting to move on with our lives by directing our attention (however briefly) to the N2201w. This so-called "3-in-1" LCD TV packs a 22-inch 1,680 x 1,050 resolution panel, a 5-millisecond response time, 1,000:1 contrast ratio and a built-in NTSC / ATSC / QAM TV tuner. You'll also find an integrated DVD player and an HDMI port, and just to prove it really is multifaceted, there's a PC input to boot. No telling if the picture quality is anything to write home about, but the $429 price tag sure is palatable.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.cepro.com/article/viewsonic_n2201w_lcd_has_built_in_dvd_player_pc_ability/">CEPro</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/">ViewSonic's 22-inch N2201w LCD TV packs inbuilt DVD player, TV tuner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://channels.isp.netscape.com/celebrity/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/1322/20080923/0824272199.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1322831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/viewsonics-22-inch-n2201w-lcd-tv-packs-inbuilt-dvd-player-tv-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>clearqam</category><category>dvd lcd combo</category><category>DvdLcdCombo</category><category>hdtv</category><category>lcd</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>monitor</category><category>N2201w</category><category>qam</category><category>ViewSonic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ZeeVee ZvBox review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/zv18md.jpg" /> <br /></div>
<br />There aren't many things we love more than when a new gadget comes along that is nothing like anything we've ever seen, so when we first heard about a box that streams HD around the house on the existing coax that is in just about every abode in America, we got pretty excited. Lucky for us, we were able to pull a ZeeVee ZvBox in for review, and after a few setbacks during setup, we were left playing with something pretty unique. The problem of course is that unique isn't really a compliment, but it can be if it just happens to be the solution you're looking for. So if you've been scouting a way to get web content on your HDTV without running any wires and without being forced to deal with a STB or the headaches that come with a wireless device, click on through to see what all the fuss is about.<br /><br />
<div align="center"><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/">Hands-on and unboxing: ZeeVee'z ZvBox</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/#958149"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/zeevee-zvbox_hands-on-(1)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/#958148"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/zeevee-zvbox_hands-on_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/#958150"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/zeevee-zvbox_hands-on-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/#958164"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/zeevee-zvbox_hands-on-(11)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/hands-on-and-unboxing-zeeveez-zvbox/#958153"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgethd.com/media/2008/08/zeevee-zvbox_hands-on-(12)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ZeeVee ZvBox review</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-streamers/" rel="tag">Media streamers</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/">ZeeVee ZvBox review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1318485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/zeevee-zvbox-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>features</category><category>hd</category><category>hd media streamer</category><category>hd streaming</category><category>HdMediaStreamer</category><category>HdStreaming</category><category>localcast</category><category>localcasting</category><category>media streamer</category><category>MediaStreamer</category><category>QAM</category><category>review</category><category>reviewed</category><category>Reviews</category><category>stream</category><category>streaming</category><category>ZeeVee</category><category>ZvBox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask Engadget HD: What is switched digital video (SDV)?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/07/mtr70001sm.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
With <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/24/cox-deploys-sdv-solution-in-virginia-hopes-to-expand-hd-offerin/">scads</a> of cable providers slowly but surely <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/01/time-warner-cable-rolling-out-sdv-new-hd-channels-in-san-diego/">converting markets</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/05/time-warner-to-deploy-switched-digital-to-50-of-their-markets-i/">delivering channels</a> via switched digital video, we reckoned now was an excellent time to dust off the terminology dictionary and dig in deeper. Fittingly, Jarad agreed: <br /><br />"I've seen that lots of markets are being switched over to SDV lately, and I've noticed CableCARD users are generally upset whenever this happens. Why is that? I thought SDV was supposed to free up space so that more high-definition channels could be distributed on the current network?"<br /><br />If you've suddenly found yourself wondering the same, head on past the break for the low-down.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ask Engadget HD: What is switched digital video (SDV)?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ask-engadgethd/" rel="tag">Ask Engadget HD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/">Ask Engadget HD: What is switched digital video (SDV)?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1243524/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/02/ask-engadget-hd-what-is-switched-digital-video-sdv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask</category><category>ask engadget dh</category><category>ask engadget hd</category><category>AskEngadgetHd</category><category>bandwidth</category><category>broadcast</category><category>broadcasting</category><category>cable</category><category>coax</category><category>features</category><category>hd</category><category>qam</category><category>sdv</category><category>switched digital video</category><category>SwitchedDigitalVideo</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 TV tuner gets reviewed, loved]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2320615,00.asp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-19-08-wintv-hvr-2250.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Just about the pull the trigger on that warmly received <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/19/avermedias-avertv-bravo-hybrid-pcie-tuner-card-gets-reviewed/">AVerTV Bravo Hybrid</a>, are you? Hold your horses just a moment. Hauppauge's WinTV-HVR-2250 recently hit the test bench over at <em>PC Magazine</em>, and we'll just get right down to the dirt: it was called "the gold standard of home theater PC TV tuners." That's right folks, the gold standard. Said card boasts twin hybrid tuners, dual hardware MPEG encoders and integrated QAM support, and apparently, using it was a real joy. Setup and installation was "a snap," and image quality was "crisp and clear." Really, the only dig reviewers had was that the QAM plug-in was still a bit unstable, but given that it is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/">still in beta</a>, that really shouldn't come as a surprise. Of note, this card will run you a touch more than the aforementioned AVerTV at $129, but it just might be worth it based on this glowing review.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/">Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 TV tuner gets reviewed, loved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2320615,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1230461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/21/hauppauge-wintv-hvr-2250-tv-tuner-gets-reviewed-loved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clear-qam</category><category>Hauppauge</category><category>hd</category><category>hd tuner</category><category>HdTuner</category><category>ota</category><category>others</category><category>pcie</category><category>QAM</category><category>review</category><category>reviewed</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><category>wintv</category><category>WinTV-HVR-2250</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hauppauge tuners net QAM support in Vista MCE, thanks to beta plug-in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.shspvr.com/smf/index.php?topic=11509.0"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/wintv-hvr-1600.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Folks <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/23/ask-engadget-hd-which-atsc-tuner-works-best-with-64-bit-vista/comments/11786958/">possessing</a> a Hauppauge HVR-1250, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/">HVR-1600</a>, HVR-1800 or HVR-2250 -- have we got an interesting tidbit for you. A fresh new beta plug-in has surfaced, which promises to give the aforementioned cards ClearQAM support within 32- and 64-bit <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/04/ask-hd-beat-does-mce-support-qam/">Vista Media Center</a> environments. Initial reports are somewhat disappointing, but encouraging nonetheless. Those with nerves of steel can hit the read link and proceed to download the beta -- but only if you promise to tell us how it goes in comments below.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2008/05/14/1622759.aspx">Chris Lanier's Blog</a>, thanks Will]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/" rel="tag">Misc</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/">Hauppauge tuners net QAM support in Vista MCE, thanks to beta plug-in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.shspvr.com/smf/index.php?topic=11509.0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1197174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/hauppauge-tuners-net-qam-support-in-vista-mce-thanks-to-beta-pl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beta</category><category>download</category><category>Hauppauge</category><category>hd</category><category>media center</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>ota</category><category>plug-in</category><category>qam</category><category>software</category><category>vista</category><category>vista media center</category><category>VistaMediaCenter</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast rolling out Science, Disney and ABC Family HD channels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/04/12-11-07-comcast_logo.jpg" /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Comcast/">Comcast </a>is stepping up its busy HD rollout (and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/20/is-your-comcast-hd-quality-up-to-snuff/">channel squeezing</a>) schedule, with several new channels spotted today in the Detroit and Chicago areas. Science HD, Disney HD and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/abcfamily/">ABC Family HD</a> are probably in your local channel guide -- Discovery HD is now listed DSCHD, while Disney is DISHD, confused yet? -- and word is they should hit many other areas Wednesday. Posters at AVSForum indicate more of the 3 channels-on-one-QAM compression tactics are afoot, take a look and let us know if having <em>High School Musical 2</em> in HD still satisfies.<br /><br />[Thanks, Nathaniel]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=453486&amp;page=193">Read</a> - Detroit, MI HDTV<br /><a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=453486&amp;page=193">Read</a> - Chicago, IL Comcast<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/abc/" rel="tag">ABC</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/discovery-hd/" rel="tag">Discovery-HD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/new-content/" rel="tag">New content</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/">Comcast rolling out Science, Disney and ABC Family HD channels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1155276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/comcast-rolling-out-science-disney-and-abc-family-hd-channels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>cable</category><category>chicago</category><category>comcast</category><category>compression</category><category>detroit</category><category>discovery hd</category><category>discoveryhd</category><category>disney channel hd</category><category>disney hd</category><category>DisneyChannelHd</category><category>DisneyHd</category><category>hd</category><category>new content</category><category>newcontent</category><category>qam</category><category>science hd</category><category>ScienceHd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[QAM gets explained in quick-and-dirty fashion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=340563"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/3-20-08-comcast-vs-fios.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
If you've noticed, quite a few Comcast users have been <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/20/is-your-comcast-hd-quality-up-to-snuff/">grumbling</a> over the quality of their HD programming recently, and they're attributing the artifacts / compression to the squeezing of three high-def channels onto a single QAM. Granted, delving into technical aspects typically isn't our bag, but given the constant talk of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HDLite/">HD Lite</a>, we figured it prudent to pass along a rough 'n dirty explanation that details why cramming more than two HD channels onto one QAM is a bad idea (in the consumer's eye). Quadrature amplitude modulation, as it's formally known, equals 6MHz of bandwidth, which equals 38.8Mbps of broadband data, which equals thousands of voice conversation, which equals "enough" space for two to three HD nets. Granted, just because three will <em>fit</em> doesn't mean things will look as good as if only two were allocated to one <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/QAM/">QAM</a>. Quite frankly, we're just scratching the surface in this space, but hit up the read link if you're itching to know more.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/">QAM gets explained in quick-and-dirty fashion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=340563>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1147776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/25/qam-gets-explained-in-quick-and-dirty-fashion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>define</category><category>explain</category><category>explaination</category><category>explained</category><category>hd</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MythTV 0.21 available, adds ClearQAM support via HDHomeRun]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Release_Notes_-_0.21"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/03/bluetvmenu_030808.jpg" /></a>It's been a while since we checked in on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/mythtv">MythTV</a> project, just updated to version 0.21, most notably adding QAM recording for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=hdhomerun">HDHomeRun</a> owners. If merely recording unencrypted HDTV via cable isn't enough, upgraded users may notice lowered memory consumption, the ability to record main and/or secondary audio channels, a couple new official plugins and a bunch of other tweaks. Check the wiki for the full list and get your Linux DVR going.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2008/03/09/mythtv-0-21-released/">TV Squad</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/">MythTV 0.21 available, adds ClearQAM support via HDHomeRun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Release_Notes_-_0.21>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1135643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/mythtv-0-21-available-adds-clearqam-support-via-hdhomerun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>0.21</category><category>cable</category><category>dvr</category><category>hd</category><category>hdhomerun</category><category>linux</category><category>myth tv</category><category>MythTv</category><category>open source</category><category>OpenSource</category><category>qam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AVerTV Bravo Hybrid PCI-E tuner handles Clear QAM]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=315482"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-25-08-bravo_hybrid.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
AVerMedia's latest PCI-E <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/">tuner</a> isn't chock full of extras, but it's definitely packing quite a punch for $79.99. The unit plays nice with ATSC, NTSC and Clear QAM signals along with FM radio, and aside from letting folks tune into HD programs over-the-air, it can also record directly in H.264 format to save space on your hard drive and provide easy exporting to iPods / PMPs. Just what the doctor ordered? Fantastic -- it's available right now.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/">AVerTV Bravo Hybrid PCI-E tuner handles Clear QAM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=315482>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1124808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/avertv-bravo-hybrid-pci-e-tuner-handles-clear-qam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>avermedia</category><category>AVerTV</category><category>Bravo Hybrid PCI-E</category><category>BravoHybridPci-e</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>h.264</category><category>hd</category><category>ntsc</category><category>ota</category><category>others</category><category>pci-3</category><category>qam</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bresnan talks 50 HD channels by end of year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533878.html?nid=4262"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Bresnan Communications" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/20071203-bresnan.jpg" /></a>In the linked interview, Bresnan Communications' VP of strategic engineering, Pragash Pillai, doubles the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/bresnan-adds-eight-hd-channels-hd-ppv/">earlier</a> HD channel plans for 2008, moving the mark up to 50. He also indicates that figure does not include the couple hundred hours of HD VOD (video on demand) that's also planned for the year. The tech plans detailed by Pillai are interesting: Besnan has about 96-percent of its systems at 750 MHz and above, and will be moving to 256 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/QAM/">QAM </a> (quadrature amplitude modulation) to get the most out of its bandwidth. In the end, he expects 2.5 HD channels per 6 MHz QAM channel. Looking to 2009, he also expects to see rollout of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MPEG4/">MPEG4</a> to homes as necessary. This kind of long-term planning is encouraging to see, especially from a smaller player -- infrastructure improvements are costly, and only companies that see the HD future will be prepared to keep growing their offerings and feeding our appetite.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/">Bresnan talks 50 HD channels by end of year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533878.html?nid=4262>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1123039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/bresnan-talks-50-hd-channels-by-end-of-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bresnan</category><category>Bresnan Communications</category><category>BresnanCommunications</category><category>cable</category><category>hd</category><category>MPEG4</category><category>QAM</category><category>VOD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey FCC, force big cable to clear our QAM!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/samsung_qam.jpg" alt="Clear QAM channel with Info" /><br /></div>
Part of the job of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/FCC/">FCC</a> is to protect the interests of us, (the common HDTV enthusiast) but there are a few ways in which they leave us in the cold and the one itching at the moment is the lack of clear <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/QAM/">QAM</a>. For as long as cable TV has existed we've been able to simply plug in our TVs and enjoy a pretty decent selection of programming, and as we move into the world of digital we are losing this ability. The problem is that almost all cable co's encrypt all their digital channels and in most areas the only digital signals not encrypted, are the ones that are also available <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/30/ota-hd-demystified/">OTA</a>, and this only because the FCC forbids it. Sure, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CableCARD/">CableCARD</a>s allow us to unencrypted these signals, but big cable has proven they don't want to support 'em and as a result most HDTV manufacturers have abandoned them. But, what <em>is</em> still included, is a clear QAM tuner and if the FCC would force big cable to send any channel in the basic tier, in the clear, then most TVs sold today could subscribe to basic digital cable without a STB or CableCARD -- and to us that'd be, real nice. The other piece of the puzzle is programming information, the broadcast industry is forced to use what is called PSIP for this and more often than not, cable co's strip this information out when they pass the signal on to the customer. The FCC should not only require cable co's to pass on PSIP info, they should force them to include -- valid and usable -- PSIP information for all clear QAM channels. This would allow TV manufactures to display the clear QAM channels -- just like analog ones have for years -- at the correct channel location and with current program information and retain the same "basic cable" experience that we've had for years. As for DRM, we don't see any reason that the FCC couldn't enforce a broadcast flag on QAM tuners, and since we're not talking about free OTA TV here, we'd bet the mandate would stick this time.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/">Hey FCC, force big cable to clear our QAM!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1062871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/hey-fcc-force-big-cable-to-clear-our-qam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>Clear QAM</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>FCC</category><category>hd</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast Media Center gets creative with compression]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6510864.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/12-13-07-cmc_logo.jpg" /></a>Make no mistake about it, as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/19/can-cable-keep-up-without-big-infrastructure-expenditures/">bandwidth belt tightens</a> around cable, carriers are grasping for ways to cram more channels into an increasingly small space. Reportedly, Comcast Media Center has devised a method to stuff three HD signals into a single 6MHz carrier, which is typically just enough to handle two HD channels without picture quality taking a dive. Though the process sounds quite technical, the long and short of it is that a "second-pass MPEG-2 encoding system from startup Imagine Communications" is reportedly being used to "stack together three signals at variable bit rates into one 6MHz QAM channel." Of course, it's hard to say if this clever methodology results in noticeably poorer picture quality, but unless something <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/14/coax-making-a-comeback/">drastic</a> happens in the world of coax, you can count on seeing a whole lot more where this came from.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/">Comcast Media Center gets creative with compression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6510864.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1062628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/14/comcast-media-center-gets-creative-with-compression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>cmc</category><category>comcast</category><category>Comcast Media Center</category><category>ComcastMediaCenter</category><category>compression</category><category>hd</category><category>hd lite</category><category>HdLite</category><category>Imagine Communications</category><category>ImagineCommunications</category><category>multiplex</category><category>multiplexing</category><category>qam</category><category>statistical multiplexing</category><category>StatisticalMultiplexing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Envision kicks out trio of Omni-series LCD HDTVs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/11-14-2007/0004705678&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/11-14-07-envision.jpg" alt="" /></a>Envision understands that the people need choices, and just in case neither of the two LCD HDTVs that the firm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/">unleashed</a> last month tickled your fancy, here comes a trio of new ones to pore over. All three units sport a 1,366 x 768 resolution, eight-millisecond response time, ATSC / Clear QAM tuners, integrated speakers, a headphone jack, S/PDIF port and a glossy black finish. On the high(er)-end, we've got the 42-inch L42W761, which features a 1,200:1 contrast ratio, twin HDMI inputs and a respectable $999 pricetag. The 32-inch L32W761 differs from its big bro by offering up a 1,500:1 contrast ratio, while the 26-inch L26W761 musters an 800:1 CR. These two will ring up at $649 and $479, respectively, and are available as we speak from a number of fine retailers, but if you've got your eye on the 42-incher, you'll be waiting till the 23rd -- yeah, <em>Black Friday</em> -- to take one home.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/">Envision kicks out trio of Omni-series LCD HDTVs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/11-14-2007/0004705678&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1040396/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>26-inch</category><category>32-inch</category><category>42-inch</category><category>atsc</category><category>clear-qam</category><category>Envision</category><category>Envision Peripherals</category><category>EnvisionPeripherals</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>L42W761</category><category>lcd</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>Omni</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Envision kicks out trio of Omni-series LCD HDTVs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/11-14-2007/0004705678&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2007/11/11-14-07-envision.jpg" alt="" /></a>Envision understands that the people need choices, and just in case neither of the two LCD HDTVs that the firm <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/">unleashed</a> last month tickled your fancy, here comes a trio of new ones to pore over. All three units sport a 1,366 x 768 resolution, eight-millisecond response time, ATSC / Clear QAM tuners, integrated speakers, a headphone jack, S/PDIF port and a glossy black finish. On the high(er)-end, we've got the 42-inch L42W761, which features a 1,200:1 contrast ratio, twin HDMI inputs and a respectable $999 pricetag. The 32-inch L32W761 differs from its big bro by offering up a 1,500:1 contrast ratio, while the 26-inch L26W761 musters an 800:1 CR. These two will ring up at $649 and $479, respectively, and are available as we speak from a number of fine retailers, but if you've got your eye on the 42-incher, you'll be waiting till the 23rd -- yeah, <em>Black Friday</em> -- to take one home.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/">Envision kicks out trio of Omni-series LCD HDTVs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/11-14-2007/0004705678&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1040397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/15/envision-kicks-out-trio-of-omni-series-lcd-hdtvs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>26-inch</category><category>32-inch</category><category>42-inch</category><category>atsc</category><category>clear-qam</category><category>Envision</category><category>Envision Peripherals</category><category>EnvisionPeripherals</category><category>hdtv</category><category>L42W761</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>Omni</category><category>qam</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_15008~121448,00.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-tvw650_usb.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Those looking for a fresh way to capture OTA signals on their computer need to look AMD's way, as the firm is kicking out three new ATI <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=TV%20Wonder">TV Wonder</a> devices today. Up first is the TV Wonder 650 Combo USB, which includes two TV tuners to pick up OTA HDTV signals / ClearQAM programming, analog TV and FM broadcasts. For those with desktops, the TV Wonder 600 PCI or TV Wonder 600 PCI Express should fit the bill quite nicely, as they offer up the same features as their USB sibling in less portable forms. Notably, all three units come bundled with Catalyst Media Center software, which enables the devices to quickly convert (read: "with two mouse clicks") recorded programming to formats suitable for use on the iPod, Zune, PSP, iPhone, Palm Treo, etc. Price wise, the 650 Combo USB will demand $149, while the other two (pictured after the jump) will run you just $99 apiece.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/">AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_15008~121448,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1013286/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>600 PCI</category><category>600 PCI Express</category><category>600Pci</category><category>600PciExpress</category><category>650 Combo USB</category><category>650ComboUsb</category><category>amd</category><category>ati</category><category>atsc</category><category>Catalyst Media Center</category><category>CatalystMediaCenter</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>hd</category><category>ota</category><category>others</category><category>pci-e</category><category>pcie</category><category>qam</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>tv tuning</category><category>tv wonder</category><category>TvTuner</category><category>TvTuning</category><category>TvWonder</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_15008~121448,00.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.engadgethd.com/media/2007/10/10-15-07-tvw650_usb.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Those looking for a fresh way to capture OTA signals on their computer need to look AMD's way, as the firm is kicking out three new ATI <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/search/?q=TV%20Wonder">TV Wonder</a> devices today. Up first is the TV Wonder 650 Combo USB, which includes two TV tuners to pick up OTA HDTV signals / ClearQAM programming, analog TV and FM broadcasts. For those with desktops, the TV Wonder 600 PCI or TV Wonder 600 PCI Express should fit the bill quite nicely, as they offer up the same features as their USB sibling in less portable forms. Notably, all three units come bundled with Catalyst Media Center software, which enables the devices to quickly convert (read: "with two mouse clicks") recorded programming to formats suitable for use on the iPod, Zune, PSP, iPhone, Palm Treo, etc. Price wise, the 650 Combo USB will demand $149, while the other two (pictured after the jump) will run you just $99 apiece.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/portablevideo/" rel="tag">Portable Video</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/">AMD unveils trio of new ATI TV Wonders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_15008~121448,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1013281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/15/amd-unveils-trio-of-new-ati-tv-wonders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>600 PCI</category><category>600 PCI Express</category><category>600Pci</category><category>600PciExpress</category><category>650 Combo USB</category><category>650ComboUsb</category><category>amd</category><category>ati</category><category>Catalyst Media Center</category><category>CatalystMediaCenter</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>hdtv</category><category>ota</category><category>pci-e</category><category>pcie</category><category>portable video</category><category>portablevideo</category><category>qam</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>tv tuning</category><category>tv wonder</category><category>TvTuner</category><category>TvTuning</category><category>TvWonder</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HDHomeRun to bring DVB to Media Center]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2007/10/09/1242372.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/hdhomerun_front.jpg"  alt="HDHomeRun" /></a><br /></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/">HDHomeRun is our favorite networked HD tuner</a> -- never mind the fact it's the only one. Having a tuner on the network instead of in the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/">HTPC</a> has a few advantages including the ability to use a smaller PC case, to use as many tuners as you want, and not having to run coax cables to the PC. But what might be the biggest advantage is, that it can add tuners that would otherwise be unavailable -- like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/QAM/">QAM</a> on Windows Media Center Edition. Now it seems the team at SiliconDust is working on a version for the rest of the world and will enable <span id="GoogleAdsense" runat="server" visible="false">DVB-T and unencrypted DVB-C for various DVR packages on the PC including Microsoft's Media Center Edition.<br /></span><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-streamers/" rel="tag">Media streamers</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/">HDHomeRun to bring DVB to Media Center</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2007/10/09/1242372.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1010697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/11/hdhomerun-to-bring-dvb-to-media-center/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DVB-C</category><category>DVB-T</category><category>hd</category><category>HDHomeRun</category><category>QAM</category><category>SiliconDust</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000010&amp;newsId=20071008005952&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-8-07-l32w661.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Envision's latest duo of LCD HDTVs aren't apt floor anyone with cutting edge extras, but they do manage to pack enough features to satisfy a large chunk of those scouting a new 32-incher. Up first is the L32W661, which features a 1,366 x 768 resolution, 1,200:1 contrast ratio, eight-millisecond response time, 500 cd/m2 brightness, 178-degree viewing angles and an integrated NTSC / ATSC tuner that supports <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Clear%20QAM">Clear QAM</a>. Furthermore, the set boasts built-in 16-watt speakers, two HDMI sockets, a pair of component / S-Video / composite jacks and a S/PDIF audio output. For those only needing a single HDMI port, the L32W698 (shown after the break) is available for the same price, but it sports a debatably sexier frame.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/">Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000010&amp;newsId=20071008005952&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1008453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>Envision</category><category>Envision Peripherals</category><category>EnvisionPeripherals</category><category>EPI</category><category>hdtv</category><category>L32W661</category><category>L32W698</category><category>lcd</category><category>qam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000010&amp;newsId=20071008005952&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/10-8-07-l32w661.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Envision's latest duo of LCD HDTVs aren't apt floor anyone with cutting edge extras, but they do manage to pack enough features to satisfy a large chunk of those scouting a new 32-incher. Up first is the L32W661, which features a 1,366 x 768 resolution, 1,200:1 contrast ratio, eight-millisecond response time, 500 cd/m2 brightness, 178-degree viewing angles and an integrated NTSC / ATSC tuner that supports <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=Clear%20QAM">Clear QAM</a>. Furthermore, the set boasts built-in 16-watt speakers, two HDMI sockets, a pair of component / S-Video / composite jacks and a S/PDIF audio output. For those only needing a single HDMI port, the L32W698 (shown after the break) is available for the same price, but it sports a debatably sexier frame.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/">Envision's latest 32-inch LCD HDTVs handle ATSC, Clear QAM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi_menuItemID=887566059a3aedb6efaaa9e27a808a0c&amp;ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000010&amp;newsId=20071008005952&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1008452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/09/envisions-latest-32-inch-lcd-hdtvs-handle-atsc-clear-qam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>clear qam</category><category>ClearQam</category><category>Envision</category><category>Envision Peripherals</category><category>EnvisionPeripherals</category><category>EPI</category><category>hd</category><category>L32W661</category><category>L32W698</category><category>lcd</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ViewSonic's Diamani DUO HDTVs handle OTA programming, word processing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.viewsonic.com/companyinfo/pressrelease_detail.cfm?key_press_release=1874"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/9-20-07-nx1932w.jpg" /></a>ViewSonic's Diamani DUO lineup claims to be a couple of widescreen HDTVs at heart that just handle monitor duties <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/02/lgs-22-inch-flatron-m228wa-lcd-doubles-as-hdtv/">on the side</a>, but we don't see any reason to neglect these two displays just because you don't have television on the brain. The 19-inch NX1932w offers up a 1,440 x 900 resolution, five-millisecond response time, 800:1 contrast ratio, 300 cd/m2 brightness, a pair of five-watt speakers, integrated ATSC / NTSC / QAM tuner, and a bevy of inputs including HDCP-compliant HDMI, VGA, component / S-Video / composite, and audio in / out. The 22-incher musters up a 1,680 x 1,050 resolution and a 1,000:1 contrast ratio, but otherwise mimics its smaller sibling in the specs department. The new duo is available immediately for $349 and $399 -- we'll let you guess which pricetag belongs to which.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9782223-1.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Crave">CNET</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/lcd/" rel="tag">LCD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/ota/" rel="tag">OTA</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/">ViewSonic's Diamani DUO HDTVs handle OTA programming, word processing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.viewsonic.com/companyinfo/pressrelease_detail.cfm?key_press_release=1874>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/994663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/21/viewsonics-diamani-duo-hdtvs-handle-ota-programming-word-proce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>Diamani DUO</category><category>DiamaniDuo</category><category>hd</category><category>htsc</category><category>lcd</category><category>NX1932w</category><category>NX2232w</category><category>ota</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><category>viewsonic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Zatz gets cozy with Moxi's forthcoming DVRs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-07/more-details-on-upcoming-moxi-dvrs/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/07/7-6-07-moxi.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Unfortunately, we can't fill you in on hard pricing or availability information on Moxi's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/moxi-prepping-hd-dvr-for-retail/">impending DVR lineup</a> just yet, but Mr. Dave Zatz was able to get a feel for what they'll be like when that time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/moxie-announces-plans-to-go-retail-with-hd-dvr/">finally comes</a>. Swinging through <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/diego-plans-to-release-two-stand-alone-hd-dvrs/">Digeo</a>'s office, he was able to spend a little time with the firm's Home Cinema HD DMR -- which sports both ATSC and NTSC tuners, an integrated 5.1 audio amplifier, and strangely lacks <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CableCARD/">CableCARD</a> support -- and the Multi-Room HD DMR (read: the impressive one). The latter unit is CableCARD-friendly, comes bundled with a Moxi Mate extender for multi-room viewing, and will support HD streaming via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/1394ta-and-hana-to-offer-1394-over-coax-via-uwb-home-networkin/">1394 over coax</a>. Both devices include a built-in CD / DVD drive (no high-definition options?), can interface with networked PCs, and even feature eSATA expansion ports for upping the storage. Of course, nothing official has been leaked, but Zatz got the impression that a "fall release" was in the realm of possibility. Tag the read link for more of the hands-on goodness.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/dvrs/" rel="tag">DVRs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/">Zatz gets cozy with Moxi's forthcoming DVRs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-07/more-details-on-upcoming-moxi-dvrs/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/934460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/06/zatz-gets-cozy-with-moxis-forthcoming-dvrs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atsc</category><category>cable</category><category>CableCARD</category><category>details</category><category>digeo</category><category>hd</category><category>hd dmr</category><category>hd dvr</category><category>HdDmr</category><category>HdDvr</category><category>moxi</category><category>ntsc</category><category>others</category><category>qam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadian cable providers locking out Vista Media Centers?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/16/176207/ShowThread.aspx"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/06/6-1-07-drm_canada.jpg" /></a>Nearly a month after Warner Bros. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/08/warner-bros-ends-advance-screenings-in-canada-blames-piracy/">axed advanced screenings</a> in Canada while tagging priacy as the scapegoat, now Canucks are facing another bout with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DRM/">DRM</a> right inside their homes. According to a lengthy list of complaints over at TheGreenButton, it appears that some Canadian cable providers (Rogers and Shaw, namely) are seemingly throwing the broadcast flag onto a questionable amount of content. Essentially, users who are trying to record said programming via their own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=vista+media+center">Windows Vista Media Center</a> setup are receiving all sorts of errors and messages informing them that the material (even on basic cable) they are trying to record is laced with "restrictions set by the broadcaster and / or originator of the content." Interestingly, it seems that the blame here lies more with the cable companies and not some glitch within <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Vista/">Vista</a>, as more than a few customers have received responses from their providers suggesting that they ditch the whole PVR idea and instead rely on the company-provided <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DVR/">DVR</a> (at a cost, of course). So, dear Canadians, are any of you fighting this same battle?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/homeentertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mediapcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/">Canadian cable providers locking out Vista Media Centers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/16/176207/ShowThread.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/908749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/canadian-cable-providers-locking-out-vista-media-centers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadcast flag</category><category>BroadcastFlag</category><category>canada</category><category>canadian</category><category>content guardians</category><category>ContentGuardians</category><category>copy</category><category>copyright</category><category>drm</category><category>dvr</category><category>Hauppauge</category><category>issue</category><category>mce</category><category>media center</category><category>media pc</category><category>media pcs</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>mediapc</category><category>mediapcs</category><category>problem</category><category>pvr</category><category>qam</category><category>recording</category><category>shaw</category><category>stream</category><category>streaming</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><category>vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hauppauge adds QAM support to the WinTV-HVR-1600 dual tuner card]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/05/wintv-hvr-1600.jpg" alt="WinTV-HVR-1600" /><br /></div>
There are never enough PCI slots to support all the tuners we want in a home theater PC . Sure if you are satisfied with one or two tuners you're fine, but if you go big with lets say 8, you need to get more than one tuner per PCI slot. The Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-1600 does just that, and now they have added support for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=QAM">QAM</a>, which is great for watching HD cable channels without a set top box or even a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=CableCARD">CableCARD</a>. Sure you can't watch HBO or any of the other encrypted channels, but there is still plenty of great HD programming out there. As with anything else there is a catch, the QAM support is only available on the retail version of the product, and as we all know; <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/04/ask-hd-beat-does-mce-support-qam/">Windows Media Center Edition and Vista Media center, don't support QAM</a>. So you will have to use the bundled software to take advantage of the new feature.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tuners/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/">Hauppauge adds QAM support to the WinTV-HVR-1600 dual tuner card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 15:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_hvr1600.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/899310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/hauppauge-adds-qam-support-to-the-wintv-hvr-1600-dual-tuner-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>Hauppauge</category><category>hd</category><category>QAM</category><category>WinTV-HVR-1600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola to demo cable STB with ATSC tuner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/02/comcast_dvr.jpg" alt="Motorola" />In what can only make us scream: about time! Motorola announces that they will demo a new cable STBs that also includes an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=atsc">ATSC</a> tuner, you know like the ones Dish and DirecTV have offered for years. Just like the satellite providers boxes, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/30/ota-hd-demystified/">OTA</a> channels will integrate into the guide seamlessly. The obvious reason for this is to provide HD channels to customers that the cable company doesn't currently have a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/26/sinclair-and-time-warner-make-a-deal-on-hd-mediacom-still-on-the/">carriage agreement</a> for. This is a win-win scenario for everyone except the local affiliate who will lose bargaining power when trying to charge the cable company for the same thing you can get for free with an antenna.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/other-hardware/" rel="tag">Other hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/set-top-boxes/" rel="tag">Set-top boxes</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/others/" rel="tag">Others</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/">Motorola to demo cable STB with ATSC tuner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6437139.html?rssid=196>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/883375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/26/motorola-to-demo-cable-stb-with-atsc-tuner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ATSC</category><category>hd</category><category>Motorola</category><category>other hardware</category><category>otherhardware</category><category>others</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would dual must carry be good or bad for HDTV?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/06/fcc-board1.jpg" alt="FCC" style="margin: auto; display: block;" />While there is little doubt in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/17/two-years-till-the-analog-shutoff-hopefully/">how analog broadcast television</a> is going to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/are-there-any-analog-tvs-left-at-the-store/">meet its demise</a>, the jury is still out on analog cable. While some of use think that cable companies will use the DTV transition to move customers to digital cable, others aren't so sure. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is now proposing what is being referred to as <em>dual must carry</em>, which would require cable companies to carry both the digital and analog version of each local affiliate's feed, unless the cable companies <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/comcast-begins-digital-transition-in-chicago/">switch to an all digital network</a>. Sure all digital network seems great to us, but for all those without <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=qam">QAM</a> tuners in their TVs, this means <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/digital-converter-stb-details-decided/">a converter box on every TV</a> just like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/30/ota-hd-demystified/">OTA</a> folks. The FUD is getting really deep in here, but somehow we think Kevin might be on to something. If cable companies are encouraged to go to digital and since digital SD channels use far less bandwidth than analog ones, that means more room for HD and other digital services we love.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/regulatory/" rel="tag">Regulatory</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/">Would dual must carry be good or bad for HDTV?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6433097.html?display=Breaking+News>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/873805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/would-dual-must-carry-be-good-or-bad-for-hdtv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>dual must carry</category><category>DualMustCarry</category><category>Fcc</category><category>hd</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Norcent readies new plasmas / LCD HDTV for CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.antarra.com/norcent/nr_plasma.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" style="margin: auto; display: block;" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/1-6-07-norcentlcdsplasmas.jpg" /></a>While it seems we really only <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/02/norcent-set-to-slam-ces-with-12-new-flat-panel-tvs/">hear from Norcent</a> when CES is approaching, the California-based outfit is kicking it up a notch this year as well, as it plans to showcase a duo of new plasmas and a flagship LCD HDTV as well. Both PDPs will feature integrated <a href="http://laptops.engadget.com/2006/01/18/digital-television-part-ii-global-status/">ATSC / NTSC</a> tuners, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hdmi/">HDMI</a>, component / S-Video / composite, VGA, 160-degree viewing angle, SRS-enhanced stereo speakers, and a "3D digital comb filter" for color processing. Additionally, the 50-inch PT-5045HD plasma will sport a 1,366 x 768 resolution, 1,000 cd/m2, and a 10,000:1 contrast ratio, while the 42-inch PT-4246HD gets stuck with a 1,024 x 768 resolution and 8,000:1 contrast ratio, but picks up a Clear-QAM tuner and a 1,200 cd/m2 brightness rating. Over on the <a href="http://hdtv.engadget.com/2005/09/23/norcents-20-to-32-inch-lcds/">LCD side</a>, the 37-inch VION LT-3790 one ups the <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/09/27/norcents-lt-3725-anchors-its-new-lcd-line/">LT-3725</a> we saw just recently by touting a larger panel, 1,366 x 768 resolution, 1,000:1 contrast ratio, 500 cd/m2 brightness, 176-degree viewing angle, built-in ATSC / NTSC (Clear-QAM) tuners, HDMI, component / S-Video / composite inputs, VGA, and the same SRS-enabled speakers as on the plasmas. For those interested in picking one up, the PT-4246HD is on the streets right now for a very reasonable $1,199.99, while the 50-inch flavor will land next month for $1,899.99, and the $1,199.99 VION LCD will hit stores sometime Q2 2007.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.antarra.com/norcent/nr_plasma.html">Read</a> - Norcent's 42- and 50-inch Plasma displays<br /><a href="http://www.antarra.com/norcent/nr_vion.html">Read</a> - Norcent's 37-inch VION LCD HDTV<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hdtv/" rel="tag">HDTV</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/">Norcent readies new plasmas / LCD HDTV for CES</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/730433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/norcent-readies-new-plasmas-lcd-hdtv-for-ces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1080i</category><category>atsc</category><category>ces</category><category>clear-qam</category><category>hdmi</category><category>hdtv</category><category>lcd</category><category>lcd hdtv</category><category>lcd tv</category><category>LcdHdtv</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>LT-3790</category><category>norcent</category><category>ntsc</category><category>pdp</category><category>plasma</category><category>PT-4246HD</category><category>PT-5045HD</category><category>qam</category><category>srs</category><category>tuner</category><category>tv tuner</category><category>TvTuner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget HD Review: HDHomeRun]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/hdhomerunfrontmd.jpg"  alt="" /><br />
 </div>
It isn't everyday that a new class of device is released, one that requires an explanation, it's a dual ATSC/QAM tuner network device, sorta like a NAS for OTA tuners, it's called the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/11/an-interesting-new-product-the-hdhomerun/">HDHomeRun</a> and it's about the size of a small hub, has 2 coax inputs and a Ethernet port. You plug it into your antenna or cable and then into your home network and you can stream HD to any computer on your network and it even streams perfectly via WiFi, no it doesn't have WiFi built in, only Ethernet. Best of all you get all of this for $169.00. Some may call it the open source Slingplayer, and although there are some similarities there is no Slingplayer with a ATSC tuner.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget HD Review: HDHomeRun</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-streamers/" rel="tag">Media streamers</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/">Engadget HD Review: HDHomeRun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.9thtee.com/HDHomeRun.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/691639/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/30/engadget-hd-review-hdhomerun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ATSC</category><category>features</category><category>HD</category><category>HDTV</category><category>QAM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Drawbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HDTVs connected to Media Center PCs to triple by 2007]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tekrati.com/research/News.asp?id=7547"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/08/vista_logo_tattoo.jpg" /></a>We <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2005/08/23/hdtv-catch-22-research-report/">love</a> <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/04/20/abi-research-predicts-hd-dvd-to-keep-lead-this-year/">market</a> <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2005/07/27/hdtv-growth-five-year/">studies</a>, they give us an idea of the reasons why companies <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">are misled and fail to offer the right products and services at prices we want</span> make the decisions they do. Pacific Media Associates believes their research indicates that in the three year period from 2005 to 2007 the number of HDTV-connected Media Center PCs will have tripled. Not entirely surprising considering all the features added over that period, the manufacturers who have started shipping Media Center PCs en masse and that <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/02/27/microsoft-unveils-official-vista-lineup-bye-bye-media-center/">whenever Windows Vista does launch, Media Center will be a part</a> of the Home Premium and Vista Ultimate versions. While streaming and Xbox 360 integration is great, we're not totally sold on the Media Center PC dream just yet; we'll wait until the <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/05/04/ask-hd-beat-does-mce-support-qam/">QAM</a>, <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/05/08/ati-sued-over-hdcp-ready-videocards/">HDCP</a> and <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/01/30/cablecard-2-0-in-vista-only-for-certified-pcs/">CableCard</a> questions have been settled before making any <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/vista-delayed-until-2007-for-consumers/">long term decisions.<br /></a><br />[Via <a href="http://www.pvrwire.com/2006/08/07/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-expected-to-triple-by-2007/">PVR Wire</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/media-pcs/" rel="tag">Media PCs</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/">HDTVs connected to Media Center PCs to triple by 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tekrati.com/research/News.asp?id=7547>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/652163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/08/hdtvs-connected-to-media-center-pcs-to-triple-by-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>high definition</category><category>HighDefinition</category><category>market research</category><category>MarketResearch</category><category>media center</category><category>MediaCenter</category><category>pvr wire</category><category>PvrWire</category><category>qam</category><category>windows vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CableLabs specs DOCSIS 3.0: IPv6, 160Mbps internet and more HDTV in 2008]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cablelabs.com/news/pr/2006/06_pr_docsis30_080706.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.hdbeat.com/media/2006/08/cablelabs.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/search/?q=cablelabs">CableLabs</a> announced today that the Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications (DOCSIS) 3.0 has been drafted. The new standard will allow cable operators to more efficiently use their frequency and offer speeds as high as 160Mbps downstream and 120Mbps upstream. Whether or not we get speeds 10 times higher than cable modems and DSL currently offer anytime soon, the new standard will also allow operators to use their bandwidth for stuff we will definitely enjoy, like <a href="http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/07/01/cablelabs-prez-hd-vod-is-cables-best-weapon-against-satellite/">more HDTV channels and VOD</a>.<br /><br />Unfortunately because of the major hardware changes required, we probably won't see this rolled out until at least 2008, so cable companies may use pre-3.0 equipment to roll out higher speeds and features to compete with fiber and satellite television offerings. It's worth mentioning that this also affects Blu-ray and HD DVD, if neither is able to make significant impact on the market consumers may be able to download high definition movies just as easily as buying them in a store in just a few years.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://blog.cabledigitalnews.com/index.php?id=511">Cable Digital News</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cable/" rel="tag">Cable</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/">CableLabs specs DOCSIS 3.0: IPv6, 160Mbps internet and more HDTV in 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cablelabs.com/news/pr/2006/06_pr_docsis30_080706.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/651861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/07/cablelabs-specs-docsis-3-0-ipv6-160mbps-internet-and-more-hdtv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>160mbps</category><category>cable</category><category>cable labs</category><category>CableLabs</category><category>docsis</category><category>hd</category><category>hdtv</category><category>high definition</category><category>HighDefinition</category><category>modem</category><category>qam</category><category>vod</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:36:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
