<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Omen bodes well for Voodoo's gaming future]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602748/voodoo-reveals-the-new-omen-dream-machine.html#"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/it_photo_94809_26.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="left">Besides the new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/voodoo-floats-13-3-inch-envy-133-in-the-air/">Envy 133</a>, Voodoo is also launching its 22-inch tall, all-aluminum (glass, wood, and leather too) Omen tower. This time, for gamers. It features a 7-inch, 800 x 480 display for secondary information on the outside and a Voodoo designed water cooling loop on the inside to keep the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/voodoopc-website-goes-up-in-smoke-and-mystery/">fire down</a> on up to 2x CPUs (up to 16 cores) and 4x GPUs. The system tops out with a pair of 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme QX9770 processors, 8GB of 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM, and support for "next generation" NVIDIA and ATI graphics... at a price. Starting at around $7,000 and available exclusively to existing Voodoo customers at launch sometime later this year.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/">Omen bodes well for Voodoo's gaming future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602748/voodoo-reveals-the-new-omen-dream-machine.html#>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1220735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/10/omen-bodes-well-for-voodoos-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>hp</category><category>omen</category><category>qx9770</category><category>voodoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alienware relaunches Area-51 ALX desktop with overclocked 4GHz QX9770]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080522005701&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-22-08-area-51-alx.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Hold onto your frame rates folks, as Alienware has just relaunched its more-potent-than-ever <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/alienwares-area-51-alx-cf-the-first-to-use-45nm-processors/">Area-51 ALX</a> desktop. The bona fide gaming rig packs a 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/">QX9770</a>, but rather than being satisfied with Intel's work, this thing comes overclocked to 4GHz -- it's "maximum stable output." As expected, you'll find the outfit's own High-Performance Liquid Cooling solution to keep things from turning into molten hot lava, and you'll also have your choice of twin NVIDIA <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/30/nvidia-geforce-9800-gtx-triple-sli-rig-benched/">GeForce 9800</a> GPUs or an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/alienware-brings-quad-graphics-support-to-alx-crossfirex/">ATI CrossFireX configuration</a> with dual ATI Radeon 3870 X2 cards. Furthermore, you'll notice 4GB of DDR3 RAM, dual Ethernet ports, an optional Blu-ray burner, oodles of hard drive space and all the other high-end niceties you've come to expect from the company. Only problem? The $5,549 starting price that comes along with the 4GHz CPU and required 1,200-watt PSU.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/">Alienware relaunches Area-51 ALX desktop with overclocked 4GHz QX9770</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 22 May 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080522005701&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1203144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/alienware-relaunches-area-51-alx-desktop-with-overclocked-4ghz-qx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4ghz</category><category>alienware</category><category>alx</category><category>area-51</category><category>area-51 alx</category><category>Area-51Alx</category><category>core 2 extreme</category><category>Core2Extreme</category><category>gaming desktop</category><category>gaming pc</category><category>gaming rig</category><category>GamingDesktop</category><category>GamingPc</category><category>GamingRig</category><category>intel</category><category>overclock</category><category>overclocked</category><category>QX9770</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel delaying, jacking the price of quad-core QX9770 CPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/crysis-benchmark.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
Ready for more rumors of processor delays? This time, it's Intel (not <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/11/amd-delays-phenom-9700-and-9900-processors-few-notice/">AMD</a>) in the spotlight according to <em>DigiTimes</em>' sources at Taiwan motherboard makers. Intel is said to be delaying volume shipments of their quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/qx9770">QX9770</a> CPU for high-end desktops until February or March instead of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/07/intel-to-release-dual-core-celerons-on-january-20th/">January</a> as earlier believed. Worse yet, the proc is now rumored to cost $1,399 (in 1,000 unit quantities) when it ships -- not $1,200 as thought back in November. Hey Intel, if this move has anything to do with an intent to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/19/intel-to-delay-yorkfield-chips-because-of-amds-struggles/">monopolize the market</a> in lieu of AMD's inability to compete then let us remind you of something -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/08/intel-of-course-fights-back-against-eus-antitrust-charges/">EU</a> and a certain <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/intel-takes-an-antitrust-probe-from-amd-in-new-york/">Attorney General</a> are watching you.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/">Intel delaying, jacking the price of quad-core QX9770 CPU?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20080116PD207.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1088308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/intel-delaying-jacking-the-price-of-quad-core-qx9770-cpu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>qx9770</category><category>yorkfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's QX9770 quad-core to blow away competition in Q1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hothardware.com/articles/Intel_Core_2_Extreme_QX9770_Performance_Preview/?page=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/crysis-benchmark.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Want to see what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/amd-launches-quad-core-phenom-intel-shrugs/">AMD</a> is up against come Q1? You're looking at it, the 3.2GHz, quad-core, QX9770 Core 2 Extreme processor from Intel. Like Intel's current headliner -- the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/qx9650">QX9650</a> -- we're talking 45-nm Yorkfield class silicon here with 1600MHz front side bus and 12MB L2 cache. <em>HotHardware</em> got their hands on the proc a bit early and call it the fastest quad-core processor they've ever tested, "bar none." Generally speaking, they found it to be about 5 - 8% faster than the QX9650. As you can see from the graph up there, it easily smokes the $300 Phenom 9700 and the $350 2.6GHz Phenom 9900 (both due in Q1) likely won't fare much better. Just keep in mind that Intel's top-performer will cost you around $1,200 by the time it pops in Q1. Somehow, we don't think that's going dissuade any Crysis gamers out there.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/">Intel's QX9770 quad-core to blow away competition in Q1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hothardware.com/articles/Intel_Core_2_Extreme_QX9770_Performance_Preview/?page=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1043363/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/intels-qx9770-quad-core-to-blow-away-competition-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>core 2 extreme</category><category>Core2Extreme</category><category>intel</category><category>phenom</category><category>phenom 9700</category><category>Phenom9700</category><category>quad-core</category><category>qx9770</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
